/diy/ - Do It Yourself

>>2045266
not unexpected. but at least you're actually making up ideas and then implementing them. that's a capability that will help you
what is useful will vary according to the person. maybe you need a desk clock but only have some weird surplus display. maybe you want an appliance monitor so you don't have to go to the basement/garage/laundry room until the washing machine is done (would you like to learn Bluetooth, Wi-Fi or nRF radio? line current monitoring, accelerometer, or an electret mic listening for the buzzer?)
/mcg/ needs a roll list like /ohm/'s I think

>>1690919
really need that ticking cleaned up for a proper r8, to hear how much is phasing and how much is vibrato. is the 100% wet signal steady in volume and basically indistinguishable from the input? if so, you're doing it right

>>1690935
>LCDs
nobody said you had to build from scratch
instead of going with some super variable monster like that, maybe build yourself a bench box, something like those singing dancing breadboard workstation "trainers" that sell for $100s to universities but minus the breadboards
do you really need a linear PSU? if you want a voltage output and don't mind a touch of noise in the hundreds of kHz, pick up some of those <$1 switcher modules and replace their voltage adjust with a panel pot of like resistance. no micro will care. if you want one notch upmarket, do the same with one of the boards with two trimmers, one for voltage and one for current limit. avoid the ones with three trimmers because they're a bit specialized for charging batteries

>>1690990
read your Veblen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspicuous_consumption

>>1691070
type the question into google. you would be surprised how often and well that works as a first approximation. when it doesn't, enter words related to your query that you want to appear in a result like synchronous motor frequency change or something like that

>>1691071
if it ever integrates a field solver and a more complex constraint system, it's a done deal

>>1691085
some musicians are incurable hipsters and will buy the brand not the sound. see response to >>1690990 above
>1/4 of the price
you should price out power amps sometime

>>1691088
пoжaлyйcтa, пoлoжитe

>>1691089
>monitor mode
then you need a good, stable, precise NTSC source. maybe random video game NTSC outputs aren't stable enough. precision NTSC generators are <$50 on ebay

>>1691094
easier, actually, because audiophiles don't use their ears
>sham tube amp
based merchant of the year

>>1691098
>salinas
can confirm

>>1631439
dude had some bar graph nixies with a lot of segments iirc

>>1631461
pulled it directly out of my ass. you are, of course, correct

>>1631465
but far from current- or voltage-regulated

>>1473114