/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>6371247

ayy

>>6264923
the amounts of caffeine you get from a cup of coffee are very low, and even if you drink 3-4 together the tolerance builds up so fast you would stop feeling the effects in a week

take it from someone that takes 1g of anhydrous caffeine ed when cutting.

how do you feel about being an autist?

>>6254217
>rants about how a cheaper alternative would fill his needs, but he prefers a nicer car
>his car turns out to be shit
>whatever faggot it fits my needs

the hypocrisy

>>6266986

>200 kcals
>6g of protein

ayy

>>6266916
>people say i'm fine
the only point where people will start telling you you are fat is when you reach hamplanet status and they legitimately start worrying about your health. otherwise they'll just be polite, because they see your obesity as a cosmetic issue and not a health issue (assuming you're skinnyfat). and since it's generally rude to comment on such things, don't expect someone to do so

>>6264129
cutting while a fatass is extremely easy. i only slip on my cuts and start having cheats or refeeds or whatever you call them after i drop below 13% bf or so, up until then I don't even feel hungry. i went from 130kg/286.5lbs down to 90kg/198lbs in a year, been fluctuating in the 1x% bf ever since

>Every time I do fantastic for about 3 months, then reward myself with a cheat day for being so good

>i stayed sober for about 3 months, then i rewarded myself with a bottle of whiskey for being so good

are you retarded? you don't see what's wrong here? until you drop back to human size you shouldn't even be thinking about cheat days

>>6261260
yohimbine plus ephedrine is a dangerous combo. also yohimbine is useful only for people with areas that tend to have "stubborn fat", it's not for everyone.

>Nigga I don't even feel hunger

ec stack hunger suppression is mostly placebo. ephedrine has a really short half-life, so even taking it 3 times per day it still doesn't stay in your blood for long. i took eca and when i started dropping below 12% hunger came like a mofo, it always does.

>>6260143
>religion hate is nonsense
>fat people are dumb

you're wrong in both cases

>>6265131
most vegeterians and vegeterian due to moral reasons, very few of them delude themselves into thinking it's actually healthy. thing is, for eggs/milk to be produced animals still die in the process, making eating eggs and milk while refusing to eat meat a hypocrisy

>>6258914
>weight loss

more like heart attack cauliflower. unless you're running marathons, there's no way to fit that in your macros during a cut

>>6265936
>since my parents won't let me cook meat at home

>>6255569

my maint is 2850 without cardio, so even a conservative bulk would make it 3100-3200kcals. plus i do cardio every day, sometimes twice a day. post your stats faggot, bet you don't even bench 1plate with your gay ass almond milk cookies

>>6255550
i fucking study this for a living you fucking layman, you think reading the wikipedia article on evolution makes you a fucking biologist?

natural selection is fucking required, there is no way for the "better" genes to prevail if everyone gets to mate, and when we have ways of medicating genetic illnesses

why the fuck am i even replying to your fucking couch biologist ass. go eat your burger because you NEED it. why? because EVOLUTION

fucking retard

>>6255545

what the fuck are you talking about idiot? how many kcals do you bulk on? a typical bulk is 3500k kcals, an hour of cardio burns 500-600 kcals. thats 4 thousand fucking kcals, and you cant fit 900kcals of cookies in it? did you not take 6th grade math?

enjoy your shitty cookies faggot, i just know you're the kind of faggot that eats oats and drinks whole milk to "hit his macros"

>>6255518
do you even know what evolution is? can you please stfu when you obviously have no fucking clue about fucking anything? why does every fucking pleb on this board feel the need to voice their retarded opinions on fucking everything?

evolution is not fucking relevant, since natural selection isn't fucking relevant anymore

>>6255519
it's easy to get protein when you're bulking, you only need 1.6g/kg of lean body mass. so unless you are a manlet, you can easily fit cookies in your macros if you do cardio

>>6255499
>low kcal substitute

why? if you're cutting you don't need cookies to begin with. you can't live without cookies until your cut is over? are you 4 years old?

>>6255418

what you said makes no sense, evolution isn't relevant to humans anymore. good job though, got me to respond seriously many times. 6/10

>>6255359

and if any of those things cause emotional instability to you, to a point that you might consider killing yourself, like i said please visit a shrink. your life must be very shallow if carnal pleasures constitute for so much, you aren't a fucking dog. there are plenty of vegeterians/people with metabolic disorders/people that exercise etc that have to tailor their nutritional needs to fit their lifestyle, and they do it just fine

>>6255323
your emotional state depends on eating meat? I understand meat making your life a little happier, but is eating meat the only thing that keeps your emotional state stable? if you stop eating meat, you'll kill yourself?

if so mate you have a serious problem, I'd suggest visiting a psychiatrist asap

>>6255302
do you have some reading comprehension problem? or are you just throwing poor b8 trying to make me reply irrationally?

>>everyone who eats meat lives in the first world

i did not say that. i said that for those who live in the 1st wrong, the above is true. as for the lower classes in shitty countries, i am fully aware that most people aren't able to afford proper supplementation needed for a healthy vegeterian lifestyle. i am just assuming most people reading this at the moment live in first world countries, hence what i said applies to them

>everyone who eats meat is doing it for the wrong reasons
there are no wrong or right reasons, morality isn't black and white. what is right today might be wrong in 300 years, it all depends on society's approval of it. at the moment, eating meat for taste/convenience is considered morally ok. in 300 years maybe it will not be, you will never know. remember owning slaves was a-ok 200 years ago

again, all i am saying is that you eat meat for pleasure and not because you need it

>>6255293
you don't need to be happy, you want to be happy. you choose to eat meat because if offers you pleasure due to it's taste, like I said above. you would survive without it, and be a little less happy. for that happiness, countless animals will have to die over your lifetime and you are ok with that trade, because society tells you it's morally ok. i don't see where we disagree

>>6255285
are you saying i implied that? i clearly didn't

all i said is meat is convenient and tasty, and that's why you choose to consume it despite the fact that this habit causes many deaths to animals that feel pain like you and me. you don't need to eat meat to sustain yourself, you want to eat meat for the above reasons. in today's society, it is socially acceptable to do it, but justifying it by saying it's "natural" is pure bullshit