[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 14 KB, 250x250, chili.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093143 No.6093143 [Reply] [Original]

Thinking about making some chili tonight. What does /ck/ like in their chili?

>> No.6093150

beans, no beans, rinse and repeat, thread over, let's go home.

>> No.6093155

>>6093143
>meat
>spices

Add anything else and it's a stew.

>> No.6093173 [DELETED] 

>>6093143
I like pinto beans in mine fresh from the oven. Put at 475 for five hours then to 425 for 3 hours. Pintolicious!

>> No.6093178

>>6093155
water and any solids=stew

>> No.6093180

>>6093143
I tried to make a chili recently for two people, I just looked for what people tend to use and put together what sounded decent and it came out alright.

Beef
Beef stock
Red wine
Onions
Garlic
Cumin
Chili powder
Salt
Whole bird's eye chili x3
Chopped scotched bonnet

Simmered it for quite a few hours.

>> No.6093192

cuts of stewing beef or casserole steak cubed into mouthful sized bites
two medium onions
red kidney beans or pinto beans or both
one can of chopped/crushed tomatoes
some tomato puree
3-4 cloves of garlic
mixed sliced chilis with the seeds removed
a bottle of beer or beef stock or sometimes just water (its perfectly fine)

spices i use:

chili powder
cumin
paprika
cayenne
2-3 bay leaves
black pepper and salt

use for as much cumin and paprika you use, add 2.5 times as much chili powder and half as much cayenne

simmer for like 2-3 hours and serve with tortilla chips

>> No.6093292

>>6093178
Who said anything about there being water in chili?

>meat
>spices

Fuck off.

>> No.6093321

>>6093292

There's water in anything you might cook chili with. Beer, wine, stock, broth, vegetable juice, etc--those are all mostly water.

>> No.6093335

>>6093321
>using liquids

The dish is chili and meat so that's all you use. Fatty diced beef or other low quality meat cut, browned in a dish, add chilis of choice and cook until ready.

>> No.6093339

>>6093335

chilis are also mostly water bro.

"stewing" refers to the method of cooking. even the minimalist version of chili you are describing qualifies as a "stew" because of the manner in which it is cooked.

>> No.6093350

>>6093339
>chilis are also mostly water bro.

You are an idiot.

I guess all recipes are just carbon and water, eh? Go home everyone. We're wasting our time. Mr. Genius here has figured it all out for us.

>"chemicals" in food
>"organic" produce
>"whole grains"

>> No.6093360

>>6093350

There's no need to sperg out over your precious minimalist chili recipe bro. Nobody is insulting it. But if you can't see that the cooking method you're describing is "Stewing" (e.g. the verb), then that's a problem.

If you'd rather look at it from another angle, what else would you call it? It's clearly not roasting, frying, boiling, or baking now is it? Simmering/stewing is the only reasonable choice.

>> No.6093373

>>6093143
When the original chili was created in London in 1758 it didn't have beans in it.
I believe it was Mrs Beeton who invented it.

>> No.6093375
File: 196 KB, 1024x819, 1387248611092.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093375

Mannnn, when I find beans in chili I start to RAGE. Fucking assholes and beans. It turns into bean soup when you put beans in it. I'll fight anyone IRL over this i'm 6'2 215 come at me im ready for a fight over beans

>> No.6093388

>>6093360
It's braising you god damn pleb.

lrn2cookingterminology

>> No.6093389

>>6093143
Only Chilies and beef. USE NOTHING ELSE! Even putting beef in that dish is stretching it.

No salt, pepper, oil, NOTHING! Just drop a chili on a pan... no don't use a pan, they didn't use pans. Make 1 campfire and roast a chilie on a stick, serve.

>> No.6093391

>>6093389
>being this buttmad
It's time for your yearly colonoscopy.

>> No.6093396

>>6093150
>>6093155
>>6093335
Whenever I see autistic fucks like you I am always glad you are not responsible for any decisions in the culinary world.

Obviously cooking is all about long standing traditions and never deviating to make anything new and exciting. You are as bad as those old Italian fucks who spout M-muh tradition!

>> No.6093402

>>6093388

>>implying there is a significant distinction between the two.

No sir, my chili isn't a stew, it's a "braise".

>>you really think anyone will take that seriously?

>> No.6093403

>>6093396
>and never deviating to make anything new and exciting
That's not true. If you want to add beans to chili, then call it something else. It's that simple. Here in the South we call it "chili with beans". See how that works? Chili is the food without the beans, so you need to say "with beans" when speaking about your stew. It's rather simple, really.

So the next time you're discussing chili with someone who actually knows what they're talking about (the people you quoted, for instance), be sure to let them know that your "chili" is in fact a stew that you've added beans and corn to. That way they can disregard all your opinions at the onset instead of wasting their time.

>> No.6093406

>>6093402
Nobody cares how you cooked it as long as it's a proper chili. A chili is a chili.

>you really think anyone will take that seriously?
Unlike beans in chili, yes, I think they ultimately would.

>> No.6093411

>>6093403

Actually, if you want to be that pedantic about it, "Chili" refers to the pepper only. If you were cooking a dish with the peppers and meat that would be "chili con carne", e.g. "chili with meat".

>>6093406
Agreed.

>> No.6093416

>>6093403
How awesome is it that your dad is John Travolta? Does he keep you on that special diet to help curb your affliction?

I love when the whole "real Texans.. blah blah. chili... blah blah.. NO BEANS...gay sex" thing comes up. It reminds me how people love to feel superior to others due to their food preferences because that's all they have going for them in their lives.

>> No.6093417

>>6093403
>Here in the South we call it "chili with beans".

Here in the South, we call it chili. I don't know what South you are in.

>> No.6093424

>>6093375

Yeah, but we really can't be responsible for your ignorance.

>> No.6093425

>>6093411
>"Chili" refers to the pepper only. If you were cooking a dish with the peppers and meat that would be "chili con carne", e.g. "chili with meat".
True. I stand corrected.

But if you really want to be pedantic, you'd never ask someone if they want "some chili". You'd ask them if they'd like a "bowl of red". Say anything else and you've, if I may, spilled the beans that you have no idea what you're talking about.

>> No.6093426

>>6093417
"bowl of red" or GTFO

>> No.6093432

>>6093425

I've heard people refer to it as a "bowl of red", but that has been relatively rare. Chili is the standard, at least here in Texas.

>> No.6093433

>>6093416
If you want to put sausage on a bun and call it a hamburger, then be my guest. But it ain't a god damn hamburger.

Chili doesn't have beans. Period.

>> No.6093435

>>6093433

Tell that to old timers here in Texas and you'll leave the wondering why you are such a nitwit.

>> No.6093438

>>6093433
Let's see a scholarly reference to back that claim up.

Tonight in making chili with beans, tomato, bell pepper, getting the red with paprika, and heat from horse radish just for you.

>> No.6093439

>>6093433

The reality is that chili may or may not have beans. It's up to the cook. If you don't like it, then you don't have to eat it. Go fix your own and quit bitching about it.

>> No.6093440

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8_63NiTENw

because just beef and spices sounds boring

>> No.6093444

>>6093433
So beans to a dish transforms is so dramatically that it requires a completely new classification? And sausage buns to burger is ridiculous leap in logic, that was a shitty analogy.

>> No.6093445

Trying to claim that it isn't chili if it has beans is kind of like claiming it isn't a hamburger if it has cheese on it.

>> No.6093449

>>6093445
>kind of like claiming it isn't a hamburger if it has cheese on it.

Perfect analogy.
Hamburger = no cheese.
Cheeseburger = a hamburger, but with cheese added.

chili = no beans by default
chili with beans = clearly has beans added.

>> No.6093451

>>6093445
We call those cheeseburgers, genius.

>> No.6093452

>>6093444
Yes, "chili with beans" or "stew" would work.

>> No.6093454

>>6093449

The set of all cheeseburgers is a subset of the set of all hamburgers. That is, if x is a cheeseburger, then x is a hamburger.

The set of all chili with beans is a subset of the set of all chili. That is, if x is chili with beans, then it is chili.

It's really quite simple.

>> No.6093456
File: 103 KB, 638x800, 1411101250916.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093456

>>6093143
Chili is my inebriated solution to holiday meal leftovers. Meat, rice, corn, etc is all fair game. I don't care if it doesn't meet the autists definition of chili, but it comes out damn good, slow cooked. It tenderizes the hell out of all those dried up leftovers.

This time of year I am using some dehydrated habaneros and other peppers I grew in the garden to kick up the heat.

>> No.6093461

Since I like chili enough to want to eat it regularly, I usually make a healthy vegetarian bean chili. Tomatoes, black beans, kidney beans, lentils, pinto beans, sometimes garbanzo beans, mushrooms, onion, garlic, red wine, cumin, lime, jalapenos (or straight-up chipotle), habaneros, and crumbled up baked corn tortillas (put some in earlier to give flavor, then garnish with more at the end for texture). Sometimes I throw in some cubed avocado too

>> No.6093466

>>6093454
>That is, if x is chili with beans, then it is chili.
No, it is chili WITH BEANS. It's really quite simple.

>> No.6093467

>>6093438
From the research library of the Institute of Texan Cultures comes this chili queen recipe (slightly updated for shopping convenience).


Ingredients:

2 lbs beef shoulder, cut into ½-inch cubes

1 lb pork shoulder, cut into ½-inch cubes

¼ cup suet

¼ cup pork fat

3 medium-sized onions, chopped

6 garlic cloves, minced

1-quart water

4 acho chiles

1 serrano chile

6 dried red chiles

1 Tablespoon comino seeds, freshly ground

2 tablespoons Mexican oregano

Salt to taste

Place lightly floured beef and pork cubes in with suet and pork fat in heavy chili pot and cook quickly, stirring often. Add onions and garlic and cook until they are tender and limp. Add water to mixture and simmer slowly while preparing chiles. Remove stems and seeds from chile and chop very finely. Grind chiles in molcajete and add oregano with salt to mixture. Simmer another 2 hours. Remove suet casing and skim off some fat. Never cook frijoles with chilies and meat.

>> No.6093469

>>6093454

I don't see a problem with that either, as a thought experiment. Of course chili with beans is a subset of chili.

But let's leave pedantic aspie-land aside for now:

Generally when someone names a dish the purpose of that is to convey to others what's in it. Using blanket terms is silly for this because it doesn't convey much information. Specific definitions make a lot more sense. That's why when you go to a burger joint it clearly says "hamburger" and "Cheeseburger" separate on the menu. And likewise if you go to a supermarket and look at chili you'll see some labeled just "chili" and others "chili with beans".

>> No.6093471

>>6093456
>>6093461
It's fine you enjoy these recipes, but stop calling them chili, because it ain't.

>> No.6093474

>>6093438
>>6093467
http://www.uiw.edu/sanantonio/jenningschiliqueens.html

>> No.6093475

>>6093469

>That's why when you go to a burger joint

With "burger" being the general name of the food, and ham and cheese burgers being two kinds of burger

>And likewise if you go to a supermarket and look at chili you'll see some labeled just "chili" and others "chili with beans".

Yet chili with meat is specifically called "chili con carne"

>> No.6093478
File: 711 KB, 476x9300, chili.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093478

>>6093143
this is my favorite chili recipe

>> No.6093481

>>6093469

At our local fastfood place, there is no separate cheeseburger. When you order a hamburger, they always ask if you would like cheese on that.

>> No.6093485

>>6093478

that's OK anon, I'm sure if you work at it you can make good chili one day.

Your first step should be to get away from silly verticals. Now that you're an adult you don't need childish shit anymore.

>> No.6093486

>>6093481
That doesn't make it fucking so. They're obviously retarded.

>> No.6093488

>>6093481

That's nice. Your exception doesn't affect the fact that at the vast majority of restaurants they are different listings on the menu with different names and prices.

>> No.6093491

let's just call chili with beans "chili" and then chili with meat "colon cancer"

>> No.6093492

>>6093478
So many things wrong with this technique wise.

>> No.6093495

>>6093478
2 AM? why would you make that at 2 am?

>> No.6093497

>>6093495
>because asperger's

>> No.6093501

>>6093488

It doesn't matter.

A cheeseburger is a hamburger with cheese on it. The cheese does not make it "not a hamburger".

>> No.6093502
File: 38 KB, 456x596, chili.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093502

“Chili concocted outside of Texas is usually a weak, apologetic imitation of the real thing. One of the first things I do when I get home to Texas is to have a bowl of red. There is simply nothing better.” – by Lyndon B. Johnson, 36th President of the United States

>> No.6093505

>>6093501
>The cheese does not make it "not a hamburger".
But it does. It's a cheeseburger. A cheeseburger is a hamburger with cheese.

Hamburgers don't have cheese. If it does, then it's not a hamburger.

God damn you're an idiot.

>> No.6093512

>>6093502

Unsurprisingly, he died of heart disease

>> No.6093513

>>6093505

A cheeseburger is a hamburger with cheese on it. It is still a hamburger.

>> No.6093515

If you put olives on a pizza, does it stop being a pizza?

>> No.6093516

>>6093501
>It doesn't matter.

In the case of this dicussion, yes, it does.

We aren't talking about mathematical set theory here. Whether or not a cheeseburger falls into the set of hamburgers is irrelevant because this isn't a fucking math class.

The name of a dish should convey what is in it. That's the point of the name. And most restaurants would agree given the distinction on the menu.

>> No.6093517
File: 19 KB, 500x383, lonestar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093517

>>6093502
It's...it's beautiful.

>> No.6093518

>>6093512
The best part is that Ladybird added the tomatoes to the original recipe to make it "healthy"

>> No.6093523

>>6093513
>A cheeseburger is a hamburger with cheese on it. It is still a hamburger.
OK, well, good luck living in a world where you order a hamburger and get cheese on it.

Where I live, we ask for a "cheeseburger" or "hamburger with cheese". Hamburger means you want a hamburger.

>> No.6093540

>>6093515
No. But if you put pepperoni on it is does.

>> No.6093558

>>6093502

>Texasfags mad that their shitty plain chilli is outclassed by better chilli made everywhere around them

>> No.6093567

>>6093523
Your an idiot. A cheeseburger is a type of hamburger. It always will be a hamburger, and as your highly intellectual postings pointed out- its a hamburger with cheese.

Such as:
A puppy is a kind of dog, but not all dogs are puppies
A car is a kind of machine, but not all machines are dogs
A woman is a kind of person, but not all people are women
A square is a rectangle, but not all rectangles are squares
A nigger cock is a cock, but not all cocks are cocks are black.

Is there anything else you need help understanding?

>> No.6093569

>>6093567

Wow the autism is strong here.
Nobody is calling you wrong, but you seem to think you're in math class and not normal human conversation.

Go read >>6093516 a few more times.

>> No.6093572

>>6093515
No, because pizza is like a stew or sandwich. You can put all kinds of things in or on it.

Chili, like fried chicken, is meat with spices (and flour). Stuff it with cheese and you get cordon bleu.

Fried chicken != cordon bleu

>> No.6093576

>>6093502

>an important guy whose job had nothing to do with cooking said this so it means its true

go fuck yourself

>> No.6093580
File: 92 KB, 500x375, stahp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093580

>>6093567
>Your an idiot.

>> No.6093585

>>6093558
>dumbass britbong can't spell the dish correctly and acts like he has a fucking clue what chili is

>> No.6093586

>>6093576
I'll take his word over some fag on 4chan.

>> No.6093594

>>6093586

Yeah, because you're an idiot who is told what to think because he's too stupid to formulate his own opinions.

>> No.6093599

>>6093594
That makes no sense. ALL of our opinions are formed through some kind of logical, emotional, or ethical persuasion. Whether it's from a book, a movie, a person, etc.

lrn2aristotelianappeals

>> No.6093608

>>6093599

the idea is to use your brain and formulate an opinion after considering multiple sources, as opposed to blindly doing what someone else said.

>> No.6093614

>>6093608
But you're trying to make people follow your opinion blindly.

>> No.6093615

>>6093608
And "taking someone's word" doesn't imply that you haven't. At least, when I take someone's word for something, I do it first out of skepticism. Then I consider who they are (Ethos) and THAT persuades me.

It's fair to say LBJ knows more about chili than some faggot like you.

>> No.6093620

>>6093615

Alright, you can side with a dead president, I'm going to keep my opinion that the majority of successful chefs around the world also share, good luck to you.

>> No.6093621

Has anyone tried to add some coffe to their chili? It fits well.

>> No.6093623

>>6093614

I'm not trying to make anyone follow my opinion. I haven't even posted one. that was my first post in this thread.

>>6093615
I haven't said anything about chili bro, I was just replying to >>6093599, discussing the difference between an opinion formed from one source vs. multiple sources.

>>Then I consider who they are (Ethos) and THAT persuades me.

I'm genuinely curious: why would LBJ be a trused source on chili? He's neither a cook nor a historian and there is no documentation so it seems his opinion would be no more accurate than the opinion of any other person who is neither and has no evidence to support their claim? would it not make more sense to consult either researchers who document recipes, or perhaps expert chili cooks (e.g. those with successful restaurants or winners of chili cookoffs?)

>> No.6093625

>>6093623
>I'm genuinely curious: why would LBJ be a trused source on chili?

LBJ's recipe was posted. Then someone said his recipe was shit. Then someone else said they'd rather take LBJ's word on it than some random anonymous faggot.

And I agree. LBJ has more ethos. I would assume someone who travels a lot and speaks with lots of different people is educated and cultured on many different aspects of life. Not always true, but it's generally a good rule of thumb. In contrast, posting anonymously is the complete opposite of having ethos.

Otherwise, I agree with the principles behind what you've said.

>> No.6093640

>>6093623
Find me a chili cook off winning recipe that has beans in it. You can't, because beans aren't allowed in chili cook offs. Beans mask bitter flavors imparted by substandard chili powder.

>> No.6093648

>>6093640

Sounds like a great reason for most people to use them. After all, most people can't be bothered to use anything other than "chili powder" that's been sitting on the shelf for lord knows how long.

>> No.6093651

>>6093640

http://www.wholefoodsmarket.com/recipe/cookoff-winning-veggie-chili

>> No.6093656

>>6093651

Yeah, and my recipes are "award winning".

What cookoff did it win, and when?

>> No.6093660

>>6093651
I laughed

>> No.6093672

>>6093502

i have seen another version perpetuating to be LBJS, which specifies browning the beef in seut. and instead of chili powder calls for whole chilies, not specifying which kind, i guess anejo? also LBJ used to make it with deer instead of beef on his drs advice.

>> No.6093677

>>6093621

some one in a prvious thread claimed that in texas, chocolate, coffee and anchovies are all considered cheating and would get you kicked out of the contest.

>> No.6093693

>>6093640

Competition chili gends to be much different from normal eating chili. Just because competition chili cannot have beans says nothing about whether chili can or cannot have beans.

>> No.6093696

>>6093625

LBJ's recipe is just a recipe. It is notable because it is LBJ's recipe instead of your recipe or my recipe, but it does not mean anything more than that. It certainly does not define chili.

>> No.6093697

>>6093623
>I'm genuinely curious: why would LBJ be a trused source on chili?

At best, he's a trusted source on his chili recipe. Other than that, it doesn't mean anything.

>> No.6093700

>>6093696
No, the chili queen's recipe defines what chili is

>> No.6093703

>>6093389

underrated post

>> No.6093718

>>6093700

It is one recipe for chili. Nothing more.

>> No.6093723

>>6093697
Well, he and a Dallas newspaper man popularized the dish in the sixties, and he was raised in the region where the dish originated, long before it was popular elsewhere.

>> No.6093727

>>6093718
It's the oldest known recipe for chili, I'd say that's something more.

>> No.6093761

>>6093727

What makes you think that?

>> No.6093767

>>6093474
If you lean on this recipe as being chili and that it is proof that you cannot use beans, it follows that like in the case of bolognese, any variation from this recipe is not actually chili.

You cannot use it to ban one ingredient but allow variation elsewhere.

>> No.6093768

>>6093723
>long before it was popular elsewhere.

That is very, very wrong.

Chili was popular throughout the country long before the 1960s. For example, during the Great Depression, chili was a popular item across very large portions of the country -- maybe even the entire country.

No matter what part of the US they were from, your great grandparents or great great grandparents almost surely knew what chili was.

>> No.6093769

Chili without beans is called bolognese.

>> No.6093786

I can't believe there is an entire thread about people debating what constitutes chili.

What is wrong with you people?

>> No.6093792

>>6093786

The bad thing is that this is a very regular occurrence.

>> No.6093793

>>6093786

Leave it to the Colon Cancer Kids to throw a fit when someone tries to add something healthy to their heart disease stew

>> No.6093796

You burn some mesquite
And when the coals get hot
You bunk up some meat
And you throw it on a pot.
While some chile pods and garlic
And comino and stuff
Then you add a little salt
Till there's just enough
You can throw in some onions
To make it smell good
You can even add tomatoes
If you feel like you should
But if you know beans about chili
You know that chili has no beans

If you know beans about chili
You know it didn't come from Mexico
Chili was God's gift to Texas
(Or maybe it came from down below)
And chili doesn't go with macaroni
And dammed Yankee's don't go with chili queens;
And if you know beans about chili
You know that chili has no beans

>> No.6093797

>>6093767
I think this Anon is onto something here.

>> No.6095125

One fairly often found accompaniment for chili is cornbread.

>> No.6095198

I make chili (with beans of course, like it should be) and then add browned crispy ground meat just before serving.

>> No.6095239

>>6095198
And ketchup?

>> No.6095314
File: 518 KB, 984x1446, 1384729735849.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6095314

>> No.6095326

>>6093478
lol

>> No.6095327

>>6093594
In the presence of anger, the faggot comes out.

>> No.6095330

>>6093651
>veggie chili
get the fuck out

>> No.6095364

Not sure how typical it is, but I recentlyish (August/September) met a Belizean guy and his wife who are from Northeastern Belize along the border with Mexico.

For an after-Meeting potluck, his wife made a type of chili-like dish. I didn't catch the name of the dish, so I can't really verify if it's traditionally Belizean or just something she happens to make but it was absolutely delicious.

From what I could gather, the preparation is similar to Jamaican curry but swapping out curry powder for a mix of sweet, pungent and smoked paprikas, with various sorts of dried chilies, both smoked and plain, as well as other spices, potatoes, onions, garlic, thyme and goat meat.

It was seriously the tastiest "chili," if you can call it that, I've ever had.

We've started to get some Belizeans moving to my area, most of whom are Catholics. The couple are the first I've met who are Quaker.

>> No.6095587

Just take shredded hamburgers, beans, throw them together, throw some cheese on it, douse it in ketchup and franks red hot. boom chili

>> No.6095619

>>6093143

meat and beans, removing these makes it spicy soup (only poor people eat soup)

>> No.6095706

>>6095619
Stupid people*

Soup isn't cost effective to make unless it's just water and lentils.

You'd call that watery lentils.

>> No.6095749

I like Beans and meat with a fuck load of cheese and fritos. Oh ya baby. I like to try different meats though like lamb and bison mixed in sometimes.

>> No.6095766

>>6093677
Now that's just retarded

>> No.6095797

>>6095706
>Soup isn't cost effective to make unless it's just water and lentils.
Going to the store and buying ingredients to make soup isn't cost effective. But saving raw scraps from other meals to turn into a soup definitely is.

>> No.6095802

>>6095797
>Going to the store and buying ingredients to make soup isn't cost effective.

I disagree.

I've got a pot of stock going for Ramen right now. I bought everything to make the stock at the supermarket: 6 lbs of chicken drumsticks, 3 lbs of chicken feet, 2 lbs pig's feet, and some old-fashioned salt cured ham. The total cost off all this stuff was about $12.

It's going to yield ten servings of broth, so about $1.20 each? That's not bad at all.

It would be cheaper still to use nothing but scraps. Alas all of mine got used up over the holidays.

>> No.6095818

>>6095802

> i am poor

yep, all soup eaters are

>> No.6095839

>not liking soup

maximum pleb

>> No.6095851

>>6095818

Want some birds's nest soup bro?
Or maybe shark's fin?

>> No.6095858

>>6095802

richmond va?

>> No.6095915

>>6093432
> at least here in Texas

Are we to believe that hundreds of people every year from all over the country invite you to their moms' houses to share their fucking chili with you? You don't know what people are putting in their chili.

Your mom didn't use beans. So what. Obviously she cut the crusts off your pb&j and took the time kiss your spoiled ass. rather than deal with you

>> No.6096162

>>6095915

Perhaps you confused my post with someone else's. It had NOTHING to do with beans. It was nothing more than about referring to chili as "a bowl of red".

To show you how wrong your post is, whether or not I add beans to chili depends entirely on its purpose. If I'm making chili to pour over hot dogs for a chili dog or over fritos for a frito pie, I don't use beans. If it is for eating and won't need to be warmed up very many times, I use beans.

So your reading comprehension is off the charts, but on the low side. I can't imagine how you managed to have such mediocre reading comprehension.

>> No.6096818

http://www.reddit.com/r/food/comments/2k30b0/i_cant_stop_winning_chili_cookoffs/

Master race chili reporting in

>> No.6096828

I think it's time we accept that the word chili is now a generic name for ground meat soup. It will come in all shapes and sizes; beans, many spicy chilies...no chilies, corn, cheese, raw onions etc.

>> No.6096926

>>6093471
A lot of people call such a thing chili or a bowl of chili. A lot of people don't chop in real chili peppers. Give up bro. You have already lost the vernacular war before you started. Chili: a pepper. Chili con carne: what you call chili. Chili with anything: what many more call chili.

>> No.6096944

>>6096926
The pepper is a chile, a dish consisting of meat and chiles with assorted spices is chili, a Texan dish with roots in the San Antonio area dating back to Spanish settlers from the Canary islands. It was later used by tejano cooks on cattle drives, and perfected in the plaza of San Antonio by open air stands manned (or womaned) by young ladies called "chili queens".

>> No.6096989

>>6096944
The chili pepper is also known as a chile pepper, but have fun redefining shit bro. Yep everyone else is wrong...

>> No.6097000

>>6096989
You're a jackass with no concept of history.

>> No.6097113

What makes someone think that calling people names does nothing to convice others that the someone is anything but a stupid twit?

If you want people to see you as possibly being intelligent, engage them in conversation. Calling names only makes you look like you never progressed past being an ignorant little five year old.

>> No.6097114

>>6093143
garbanzo beans are top tier

>> No.6097116

>>6097113

Of course, if you really haven't got any smarter since you were a five year old, continue to insult people and call them names. After all, you surely aren't intelligent enough to engage anyone in coversation.

>> No.6097120

>>6097113
Thanks, redditor. I'll be sure to upvote your comment.

>> No.6097162

>>6096944
> implying it wasn't a canary island dish

>> No.6097202

>>6093143
not beans

>> No.6097458

>>6097202
I like extra beans. Suck my beans.

>> No.6097762

>mfw tried making chilli with leftover pulled pork
Besides it being stringy as all fuck, its actually not bad

>> No.6097785

>>6096944
>chili queen
That's just some white faggot who prefers Mexican't dick.

>> No.6097924

>>6093478
>Throws away a chili mix
>uses what'd be in the mix anyway under the claim of being live
>throwing the beef in like that
>not using the whole delicious onion
>using anything canned outside of chopped tomatoes and at a stretch, beans
>Not using actual fucking chilis

>> No.6097926

>>6097924
Don't expect much out of redditors. They are intellectually inferior to the rest of us.

>> No.6098096

Student here.
My chili always ends up tasting really fucking plain. Any help /ck/? Here's my 'recipe'

>Fry off ground beef
>throw in onion, chili powder, smoked paprika, fry for a minute
>fry off garlic and scotch bonnet chilis for a minute
>lower heat and add 2 cans tinned tomatoes
>simmer for 30 minutes
>add cumin, salt and pepper, tomato puree and kidney beans (just to bulk it out, being poor student)
>simmer for another hour

It always tastes really fucking plain

>> No.6098113

>>6098096
Add bell peppers and more salt

>> No.6098121

>>6098113
>bell peppers

wot

>> No.6098144

>>6098096
i think youre not using enough garlic, onion and seasonening for the amount youre cooking.
i use chillis and jalapenos
you shouldnt cook scotch bonnets, they lose their flavour

>> No.6098148

>>6098144
i use 2 cloves and a good tablespoon of each seasoning, maybe even 2 for paprika

>> No.6098149

>>6093478

>beans
>corn

what. the. fuck.

>> No.6098155

>>6098096
more cumin and sugar?

>> No.6098161

>>6098096
Add beef bouillon and 1/4 cup of beer. For a pound of meat you'll prob want about 4.5-5 tablespoons of seasoning. Split it half and half between the meat and at the end when everything has simmered for a bit

>> No.6098167

>>6098161
>add beer
But I don't like beer anon.. makes being a student hell

>> No.6098169

>>6098167
you know you can taste it while its cooking and add seasoning till it stops tasting bland right?

>> No.6098653

Does anyone put cocoa powder in their chili? It seems....not good

>> No.6100136

>>6098653
not cocoa but you can try a bit of cinnamon

>> No.6100274
File: 152 KB, 634x356, OT-Genasis-CoCo-Video.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6100274

>>6098653