/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.5505140]

Does anyone on /ck/ judge their girlfriends as wifey material based on how well they cook and bake for you?

Would never want the mother of my children to be a woman who can't make a proper meal.

Pic unrelated, I recommend not clicking on it unless you want to cringe and/or possibly rage.

[Anonymous No.5505145]

>averageobamavoter.jpg

[Anonymous No.5505151]

>>5505140
>adipose activist

kek

[tornadoOFsoulsOFblack !!B4mr1uBjiww No.5505161]

>>5505145
mfw i actually mire the right more than the left now

[Anonymous No.5505164]

>Does anyone on /ck/ judge their girlfriends as wifey material based on how well they cook and bake for you?

Yes. Though it's not about how well she bakes for me specifically, it's in general. I don't expect pampering. But I expect that she can cook. It's part of being a well-rounded responsible adult.

>Would never want the mother of my children to be a woman who can't make a proper meal.

Agreed. There is nothing worse than bringing children into the world and then not being able to take care of them properly.

[Anonymous No.5505166]

>>5505140
>not doing the cooking yourself
>allowing your gf/wife to choose her own food
Enjoy your fatass wife OP.

[Anonymous No.5505167]

meh, i like to cook

i want a wife who will wash dishes for me so i don't have to deal with that shit

[Anonymous No.5505170]

>>5505151

There's another picture somewhere out there (post it if you have it) of a woman who describes herself as something along the lines of a "transfat feminist" and talks about her "phantom fat".

>these people actually exist

[Anonymous No.5505172]

>>5505167

Same here. An ideal relationship for me would be one where we'd both cook for each other.

[Anonymous No.5505177]

>>5505170
dont have that but try this on for size

[Anonymous No.5505182]

>>5505177

TOP LEL

[Anonymous No.5505193]

[Anonymous No.5505199]

>>5505177
>>5505140

what 4chan doesn't understand is that both these two people have valid points and basis. while it's cringe worthy that they'd express it like that, it doesn't make it less true or reasonable.

[Anonymous No.5505203]

>>5505199
delusional fatty detected

[Anonymous No.5505206]

>>5505199
no they don't

[Anonymous No.5505209]

>tfw dating a feminist
>tfw she can make one hell of a pie
>tfw she can bake just about anything
>tfw she is breddy gud at cooking

...

>tfw I never trust her to do eggs

[Anonymous No.5505210]

>>5505199

U R BEAUTIFUL

Just.... 2beautiful4me ;)

[Anonymous No.5505211]

>>5505170

I know they exist, there were some of them where I went to school. There was this one militant lesbian vegan who had jugs the size of watermelons on an otherwise fairly well proportioned body. Tight little butt, petite shoulders, big bambi eyes, but clearly a candidate for breast reduction surgery, it was beyond freakish. Nice face, I think mentioned to me once that she was a rape victim, as a result kept her hair short like a boy, dressed in rags, went around barefoot, seemed otherwise totally normal except on certain topics when the batshit crazy reared its head.

I wanted to hate fuck her, I guess that's where the concept of "corrective rape" came from. I mean the phrase sounds pretty ridiculous and repugnant when you read about it online, but I know that feel. I know that feel.

[Anonymous No.5505219]

>>5505210
notice how the man on the left is aggressively thumbing through ideas on how hel commit sudoku later

[That Guy !!3F68Vxi4Ef5 No.5505226]

>>5505199
>what 4chan doesn't understand is that both these two people have valid points and basis. while it's cringe worthy that they'd express it like that, it doesn't make it less true or reasonable.

[Anonymous No.5505232]

>>5505219

Nah he's just in awe of her beauty.

[Anonymous No.5505236]

>>5505199
gr8b8

[Anonymous No.5505238]

>getting into a relationship with someone without the qualities you want in a girlfriend
>judging her negatively for not having those qualities later

what a desperate, bitch boyfriend you would be

[Anonymous No.5505240]

>>5505211

The idea of hate fucking a woman has always turned me on. Just pounding a woman with fury, making her cry, having her yell 'stop' and then ball up in tears after you've came afraid of you further touching her.

Does that make me sick?

[Anonymous No.5505243]

>>5505145

back to /pol/, lunatic.

[Anonymous No.5505245]

>>5505199
>>5505203
>>5505206
>>5505210
>>5505226
>>5505236

no b8. I find it fascinating to see the discourse on 4chan regarding these topics. as a sociologist I'm interested in hearing what's so wrong about what they're suggesting. no need to derail the thread though, sorry OP.

[Anonymous No.5505248]

>>5505240

not really, best sex of my life was basically this with my boyfriend

it was a glorious mindfuck, crying and in ecstasy at the same time

[Anonymous No.5505251]

>>5505248

:) Yeah ladies usually enjoy hate fucks, assuming its a hate fuck and not rape (there's a difference guys).

[Anonymous No.5505252]

I like to cook so I don't care if she does, really. I'd prefer that she appreciate quality cooking with different ingredients so I'd have a reason to try new things.

Can't marry a chick who exclusively eats frozen pizzas and complains about food touching on a plate, for example.

[Anonymous No.5505253]

>>5505248
the best part is really the feeling of satisfaction you get when you put on your clothes and leave afterwards. It is like that feeling after a long massage, kind of sore but incredibly refreshed

[Anonymous No.5505254]

>>5505251

the difference being whether she regrets it later?

[Anonymous No.5505258]

>>5505245
no its b8
they arent healthy
>you cant into health science with a useless sociology degree

[Anonymous No.5505259]

>>5505245

I'm always up for a discussion.
The way I see it those people have some valid points but there's always at least one outright falsehood among their claims.

>it's wrong to shame people
correct
>fat people have feelings too
correct
>some of us are comfortable with our bodies
I'm sure that's true for some of them, sure. I'm sure that others desperately want to be a normal size but will not admit it.
>we are people too
yes.
>BMI alone is a flawed way of looking at health
yes.
>It's OK to be fat
No, it's a major health risk. And that is undeniable.

[Anonymous No.5505263]

>>5505254

No. Obviously I'm talking about you hate fucking your gf/so/partner not a random girl off the street who doesn't want you in the first place.

Anal is great for hate fucks, especially no lube anal.

[Anonymous No.5505268]

>>5505251
lol yeah, he is the sweetest guy alive and has trouble expressing his anger. so one night we were arguing and he was having a hard time communicating his anger, and i felt guilty, so i asked him to hit me and then we decided to tie me up. things got real interesting from there. it was like role play that came completely naturally :)

[Anonymous No.5505274]

>>5505268

Tieing people up is always fun. Not really something I'd recommend saying in public though.

[Anonymous No.5505275]

>>5505259

This. It's as if the fatties feel by hiding their lie amongst a bunch of truths that the rest of the world won't notice.

[Anonymous No.5505282]

I'm no /pol/tard but this new breed of feminism fucking enrages me.

[Anonymous No.5505287]

>>5505259
>It's OK to be fat
>No

It depends on what you mean by "OK".

Many people seem to take "not OK" to mean that it's fine to deride people for being fat and constantly publicly judge them for endangering their health.

It also seems like people sometimes use "health risk" as a cover for their disparaging opinions about how fat people are gross and disgusting.

[Anonymous No.5505291]

>>5505287

14 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 had BMI's that would be considered 'overweight' by medical standards.

How does that make you feel? Why do you hate America? Why do you hate freedom?

[Anonymous No.5505292]

>>5505259

a sensible human being? on my 4chan?

more likely than i thought!

>>5505287

it was already covered that shaming is not OK. take it in the context in which it was offered.

captcha: said supGeof

[Anonymous No.5505294]

>>5505291
I do hate America and I love freedom more than any filthy imperialist pig ever could. :^)

[Anonymous No.5505298]

>>5505294

>:^(

[Anonymous No.5505299]

>>5505294

You're a Neo-Nazi, a thug, and a bigot. I'm deeply offended and am considering filing a lawsuit. On the phone with my cousin Schlomo as we speak. Oy vey the people I have to deal with on this 4chan..

[Anonymous No.5505301]

>>5505292
>it was already covered that shaming is not OK
I know, I know, and I respect that.

It's just that some people like to play little games where they insist that they don't think that fat people are gross or inferior - it's just that they can't stand to see them endangering themselves in this way, and somehow the best way to help them is to constantly remind them of how unhealthy and terrible they are.

If you recognize that being overweight can have some health disadvantages but don't think that gives you some right to harass overweight people about their health, then, cool.

[Anonymous No.5505303]

>>5505287
>Many people seem to take "not OK" to mean that it's fine to deride people for being fat and constantly publicly judge them for endangering their health.

I see those as totally separate issues.

One is the legitimate and known health and lifestyle effects of being overweight. That's what I mean by saying being fat is not OK.

The other is people being rude. I'd sum it up as:

Being fat is not OK.

Likewise, making fun of people or insulting them for being fat is likewise not OK. Belittling people is never OK under any circumstance, be it weight or race or whatever else.

[Anonymous No.5505308]

>>5505177
jesus fuck this makes me so mad. you don't have to be "thin" to be healthy.

i know loads of chubby girls, bigger girls who people would call fat because they're bigger.
they're still healthy. they live active lives. you can notice the difference in someone who is fatter and healthy than someone who is fatter and unhealthy.

OBESE IS NOT HEALTHY. STOP TRYING TO JUSTIFY YOUR UNHEALTHY LIFESTYLE.

[Anonymous No.5505316]

>>5505258
>>5505259

except what they're suggesting isn't that they're healthy. they're attempting to, quite poorly possibly, shed light on a what they consider an unreasonable health-centered discourse. I doubt they actually think it's healthy to have a BMI of 35, they aren't idiots. These arguments, and similar that feminists argue for, are all part of trying to show that deviations from norms are socially punished.

[Anonymous No.5505323]

>>5505316

>quite poorly possibly

exactly, that's the point.

negative energy yields negative results. shaming does not motivate a person to improve, because anybody motivated by self-contempt cannot sustain health. because hatred for yourself is not healthy.

you are kinda trying to justify abuse. it's like the verbally abusive parents who do the same shit.

[Anonymous No.5505324]

>>5505316

depends on the person. I'm sure many of them simply want the disrespect to stop. Frankly I agree with them. But good luck! As you mentioned, deviations from the social norm are punished. Period. It doesn't matter if you're a man or a woman, fat or skinny, a nerd or a jock, gay or transgendered....all of it is socially punished. Fatties or feminists or whatever are not special snowflakes in that regard.

> I doubt they actually think it's healthy to have a BMI of 35, they aren't idiots

Some of them, scarily, actually seem to. The person in OP's photo specifically. Visit her blog if you dare.

[Anonymous No.5505326]

>>5505316
AND that the world, as we perceive it, is a social construct. While that might not be present in what these people are saying, it's a part of the bigger picture, and where these arguments came from. It isn't unreasonable.. The problem is the clash between people's everyday understanding and the fatties argument's philosophical implications.

[Anonymous No.5505330]

>>5505323
>shaming does not motivate a person to improve, because anybody motivated by self-contempt cannot sustain health.

I'm not trying to justify shaming at all--I think it's wrong. But I disagree completely that shaming cannot motivate people to success.

When I was in high school I was the sterotypical "98-pound weakling dork" and got picked on a lot because of it. When I went to college I started hitting the gym. A few years later I was ripped and could bench in excess of my bodyweight. It's been about 10 years since I graduated and admittedly I'm not at the same level of physical fitness that I was in Uni, but I can still crank out a dozen pullups on command and I don't look half bad without a shirt on. Know what motivated me to bust ass and get my workout and diet in order? Being called a wimp back when I was in school. One day I realized--you know what? I actually am a wimp. But it's fixable. And I did so.

And again--I'm not advocating fat shaming. But I'm sure that there are some people whom, after being called a fatty, use that as the catalyst to turn themselves around.

[Anonymous No.5505331]

>>5505323
Im not trying to do anything, i just understand what they mean. While one might consider a weight problem abuse, these people consider norms on health and weight a bigger problem.

[Anonymous No.5505339]

>>5505331

What I'm wondering is why would they care about "norms" at all? Changing social norms, even if it could be done, doesn't achieve anything.

Fixing health issues due to obesity is seems to be a much more immediate concern than what the guy sitting across the room thinks. Especially since it's actually possible to achieve.

[tornadoOFsoulsOFblack !!B4mr1uBjiww No.5505341]

>>5505316
are you high?
a sensible amount of shame can cause someone to change their life and become healthy

nodding like a fucking idiot when they say being unhealthy is ok wont

[Anonymous No.5505356]

>>5505341

Yeah, but the problem is "can cause someone to change" rather than WILL.

Some people will react like >>5505330 and do something about the problem.

Other people will mentally shut down or block it and no matter how logical, sound, or reasonable the discussion might be they simply won't get it. It's like a switch gets flipped and logic and reason simply go by the wayside. Either they get offended or hurt and get trapped by emotion or they simply just don't get it.

[Anonymous No.5505357]

>>5505331

> i just understand what they mean

by offering this as a counter argument, you are trying to justify the behavior. good intentions behind a negative behavior cannot serve as an argument AGAINST said behavior, which is what you're doing--or so it seems. if not, then you might want to communicate more effectively.

although if you want to go even further you could argue that these "good intentions" are a distortion and a projection, since true good ("pure") intentions are expressed naturally with compassion and respect. kind of like how a parent forcing an ideology on their child, through yelling, hitting, etc. can claim that this is for their child's "own good" when in fact they are just trying to impose their will to validate their own existence.

>>5505330

but you still think it is wrong. and there is a reason for that! be honest with yourself...

i suspect that your realizing that you weren't a wimp was motivated by self-respect, and that you wouldn't have even NEEDED to escape that negative perception stuck to you if you hadn't gone through the abuse. breaking someone through shaming them is not necessary to see them succeed, even if subsequent life events should conspire in such a way that self-respect is eventually restored in spite of it. that's just called growing up.

[Anonymous No.5505360]

>>5505339
Norms can be changed as our history has shown us, and are continuously undergoing change. as for what is achieved, it's a part of making the definition of "normal" less narrow, or even better: removing normal as a term and/or mindset. Which would lead to fewer people being socially punished for deviation.

[Anonymous No.5505366]

>>5505140
Yes and no. Cooking can be learned, obviously, but a girl who can cook in the first place is always better.

[Anonymous No.5505368]

>>5505357
again, it isn't my argument, it's their. and you're illustrating their point perfectly: they have nothing to "justify" for being fat. as for the second part, I think that's more applicable in your case. reread what you wrote and think.

[Anonymous No.5505371]

>>5505366
bro, we've left that topic.

[Anonymous No.5505372]

>>5505140
This picture rustles my jimmies. I also don't really understand what the fuck she is saying in the part about what she wants to study. I'm an intelligent guy, but that's just a string of buzz words that my brain doesn't seem to be able to connect very well.

Is she saying she wants to be a therapist who examines the idea that forms of oppression are born of mental illness, or that mental illnesses are born of forms of oppression?

[Anonymous No.5505380]

>>5505177
>his fucking face

Every time. Holy shit I want to shake that guy's hand.

[Anonymous No.5505381]

>>5505357
>i suspect that your realizing that you weren't a wimp was motivated by self-respect

Two things:
1) No, I really was a wimp. It was an undeinable fact. My physical strength, fitness, and stamina were pathetic. This was objectively true. I couldn't lift the weight, I couldn't run as far or as fast. I was a wimp.
2) I didn't make the change to escape the abuse. I made the change because I realize that a) I really was lacking in the physical fitness department and b) I could do something about it, so I did.

I am the sort of person who actively seeks to learn new things and better myself. I enjoy it. I did it more for myself than to escape any sort of abuse--when I moved to Uni I received zero ill treatment, insults or abuse so there was no negative pressure to escape.

>> breaking someone through shaming them is not necessary to see them succeed

Oh, I agree with that 100%. I was simply pointing out that shaming CAN work--or at least start the process. Again, I'm not justifying it ior condoning it. I'm simply disagreeing with the earlier statement:

>>because anybody motivated by self-contempt cannot sustain health

My personal experience is a clear counter example to that theory.

For me it was because for most insults or whatever that were hurled my were clearly just bullshit. I mean, what does "dork" even mean, anyway? I saw it as childish namecalling and let it roll right of my back. But lacking physical fitness was not some schoolyard insult. It was a concrete fact.

I wonder why overweight people don't separate the two in their mind? If someone says, "hey, lardass, move your fat butt" I see that as conveying two separate things:
1) an immature and rude insult spewed by some asshole. It says much (negative) about the character of who said it. Ignore it.
2) and unpleasant, but fixable, fact. Fix it.

[Anonymous No.5505386]

I love to cook and my friends love my food but honestly I am into not so typical things and don't eat a lot of things and most guys can't stand when I say what I will and won't cook

>inb4 vegan/vegetarian

I am not

[Anonymous No.5505388]

>>5505177
>"well you're wheezing and barley walking past a hobble, but I can't tell how healthy you are!"

[Anonymous No.5505389]

>>5505140
she goes to my college omg wtf

[Anonymous No.5505393]

>>5505368

>again, it isn't my argument, it's their.

why then are you speaking on "their" behalf...?


i still don't think you understand using shame tactics to attempt to motivate someone into health does not support "their" priorities--health and wellness--because shame and abuse is destructive and yields opposite results.

i am not saying i don't understand where "they" (people who abuse) are coming from. i am not even condemning them as people. i am discouraging the behavior of abuse due to its counterproductive nature, despite the intentions behind it.

[Anonymous No.5505414]

>>5505381
>I was a wimp.

that's an ego identifier that doesn't actually exist, though. maybe you couldn't do this or that, and you were weak in some areas, but THAT is the bottom line.

if you need to identify yourself with a negative thing in order to move forward, that's you. personally, the more i attach negative words like wimp, loser, etc. to my ego, the less motivated i am to succeed.

>a) I really was lacking in the physical fitness department and b) I could do something about it, so I did

to me, that signifies self-respect. wanting to improve one's self and taking responsibility.


>My personal experience is a clear counter example to that theory.

fair enough. when i hate myself, i destroy myself.

>I wonder why overweight people don't separate the two in their mind? If someone says, "hey, lardass, move your fat butt" I see that as conveying two separate things

i am willing to bet its contingent on your upbringing and how your parents communicated love and respect (or lack thereof), and how they did or didn't encourage you. just goes to show that everyone's case is different.

[Anonymous No.5505422]

>all this social justice shit on mah /ck/

>>>/tumblr/

[Anonymous No.5505426]

>>5505389
harpoon her first chance you get

[Anonymous No.5505427]

>>5505414

also, i believe that the purest form of motivation in fixing a destructive behavior is to realize how it prevents you from reaching your goals.

in other words a practical motive rather than an ego-based one.

[Anonymous No.5505440]

>>5505422

What exactly is social justice? I get mixed definitions upon looking it up.

[Anonymous No.5505441]

>>5505414
>maybe you couldn't do this or that, and you were weak in some areas, but THAT is the bottom line.

To me that is synonymous with the term "wimp". I see zero distinction between the two. Maybe it's just me but I see no connection between the term "wimp" and ego.

>>to me, that signifies self-respect. wanting to improve one's self and taking responsibility.

OK, yeah, I can see your point here.

>>fair enough. when i hate myself, i destroy myself.

Just don't assume that this is true for all people. We're all different.

[Anonymous No.5505445]

>>5505240
>>5505251
>>5505248
>>5505253
Why don't you all go live in Iran or Afghanistan or even fucking Northern India, then, since you're all down with the Islamist viewpoint on how to treat women, you worthless pieces of ignorant shit.

[Anonymous No.5505451]

>>5505445

Ugh, hate fucking a woman you love makes you a worthless piece of ignorant shit now? What?

[tornadoOFsoulsOFblack !!B4mr1uBjiww No.5505453]

to the sociology student in this thread....

>its people like you who get their degrees in things unrelated to health and or reality...
that these unhealthy and dellusional people quote and cite with 100% confidence that it supports their fat acceptance and whatever crutch arguement they employ

>mfw you probably support every antibullying measure that is tabled ... when in fact wev all been bullied in our lifetime at some point and its a part of growing up and evolving as a human being

people like you are crippling our society in so many ways

[Anonymous No.5505462]

>>5505268
You have a serious self hate complex.
There's nothing wrong with fantasy role play, but in spite of the protests I'm sure you're about to give, I really think you feel like you deserve abuse. Which not only isn't good for you, it's not good for the other person either, because it gives unwarranted value to their aggression. I might think differently, if you hadn't said you had been arguing. That's a very clear definer. The fact that you asked him to express his anger in an aggressive physical/sexual manner is an aberration. (And FYI, that's doesn't make you cool that you enjoy sexual abuse).

[Anonymous No.5505464]

>>5505440
It's a derogatory term (at least he way I mean it, and in how it's often used on 4chins) that means all the stupid bitches on tumblr complaining about cisprivilege and how they have a right to be fat and seen as attractive are just deluding themselves by making their insecurities into problems as big as true oppression.

>child soldiers in Africa? Yeah but they're thin so obviously they have it good

[Anonymous No.5505467]

>>5505464

Got it.

[Anonymous No.5505469]

>>5505451
Yeah, because that's not love, that's a control issue. Explain yourself.

[Anonymous No.5505470]

>>5505462

>You have a serious self hate complex.

tell me something i don't know :p

>that's doesn't make you cool that you enjoy sexual abuse

makes for some awesome sex, though.

[Anonymous No.5505478]

>>5505469

That is love. You love your girlfriend, you hate fuck her. It turns me on hate fucking women, I like dominating over them and having complete power over them. Not because I'm a bad guy at all. Don't overcomplicate sex. If the girls didn't like it I wouldn't do it to them.

[Anonymous No.5505479]

>>5505470
Why set yourself up for a lifetime of terrible relationships that will eventually take their toll on you in numerous physical and emotional ways? That's no way to live.

[Anonymous No.5505482]

>>5505478
No, that is emphatically not love. That's a narcissistic control issue. You need to learn the difference. You have a mental issue that prevents you from seeing reality for what it is. You need to take a long step back and learn some self awareness.

[Anonymous No.5505484]

>>5505482

I'm open minded enough to listen.

>That's a narcissistic control issue

Mind explaining further?

[Anonymous No.5505491]

>>5505479

>>5505470

you know, i could go find myself an ACTUAL abusive partner, rather than expressing my guilt through sex with a man who loves and cares about me, and is extremely conscious about my safety when we do these things.

[Anonymous No.5505498]

>>5505453
well, i'm not a student, but ok.

as for the rest, I have no idea what you're talking about, friend. you're right that my degree has nothing to do with health, which is why I'm not discussing health. Im discuss discourses and norms, where health is an example of one of many.

[Anonymous No.5505508]

>>5505498
sorry, my bad. in english its called a doctoral student, so I guess I am. different word in my language.

as for reality, which i didn't adress, you're both right and wrong. part of what we study is the perception of reality, which in fact, differs greatly from an objective reality. so you're right that it's unrelated to both health and reality, but no more so than anything else.

[Anonymous No.5505518]

>>5505484

Still waiting.

[Anonymous No.5505521]

>>5505140
Absolutely.

It's not a top priority, but it's certainly something I consider. If a woman can't cook and has no interest in learning how, that just strikes me as being somewhat irresponsible. Besides, if we have kids, I don't want to have to do all the cooking every day.

She doesn't have to be a chef, but she better know how to make at least a few solid recipes and be willing to learn more.

[Anonymous No.5505553]

>>5505491
I'm fairly sure you will eventually end up that way.

[Anonymous No.5505614]

>>5505553

thanks that's so raven, but i plan to stay with this guy. why would i consciously seek out an abusive partner (been there once) when i know the red flags and exactly how unfulfilling an endeavor those types of relationships are?

[Anonymous No.5505621]

>>5505614

just in case you don't understand the nature of rhetorical questions

i am aware of the human tendency to repeat past trauma, doesn't mean i have to subject myself to the cycle

[Anonymous No.5505663]

>>5505243
>averagelibard.bsp

[Anonymous No.5505690]

>>5505199
No, they actually don't.

[Anonymous No.5505842]

>>5505614
>thanks that's so raven

Burst out laughing.

[Anonymous No.5505848]

>>5505842
bitch got HUGE

[Anonymous No.5506015]

Guys, remember that 'shaming' really doesn't mean anything near as extreme as it initially sounds like. In the West, people are not publicly humiliated. They're not tarred and feathered. They're not even really pointed and laughed at. By 'shaming' these people mean "anything that makes me feel bad in any way". Get upset that your girlfriend cheated on you? That's slut shaming. A store doesn't stock size XXXXL shirts? That's fat shaming. You don't want to get into anything serious with a girl who has had ten boyfriends in the last six months? Slut shaming. Cinema seats aren't big enough for a morbidly obese person? Fat shaming. And so on.

Remember these are people who believe in 'micro aggressions'. They've constructed a view of the world where they are perpetual victims and have no responsibility themselves at all. You need to learn not to take the words they use at face value.

[Anonymous No.5506029]

No, because the hobby of cooking isn't the most important aspect of life. That's as autistic as /v/ not marrying a woman because she doesn't play the same video games. Get some more hobbies.

[Anonymous No.5506107]

>>5505462

Not the girl, but sexual fetishes or fantasies have nothing to do with how people function on a daily basis (except if they're highly disturbed). Don't be so shocked about this, I've slept with about 30 women and at least half enjoyed some form of abuse, choking or hitting. And these were all university students, good looking, social, happy and semi succesfulll. It's great to mix pain and pleasure, it keeps sex from going stale and a bit of fear gets back that excitement.

[Anonymous No.5506113]

>>5505478

This guy. Don't overcomplicate it.

People think way too much about sex, and have it too little. How can you ever explain a foot fetish? Noone knows, so why try.

[Anonymous No.5506122]

>>5505482

>you have a mental disorder
Doctor diagnose arrives! Fuck off silly cunt, take your highschool level of psychology elsewhere. The guy is fine.

>>5505479

Same goes here, the girl is fine too. Why do you hate people that enjoy sex a different way? Why does it make you scared?

[Anonymous No.5506123]

>>5506113

>How can you ever explain a foot fetish?

I call it sexual retardation

[Anonymous No.5506153]

>>5506029
>because she doesn't play the same video games

dude. not the same.

cooking is a life skill. it CAN BE a hobby.

[Anonymous No.5506191]

>>5506153

>cooking is a life skill

I think you can live just fine without your creme fraiche coated bacon and cheddar frittatas with truffle shavings.

[Anonymous No.5506211]

>Cook
Nice thing is that since my wife is asian we cook COMPLETELY different things. She wasn't that good at first but improved fast. Overall I am better, though.

>Bake
We don't really bake, we're both /fit/ and don't really eat that many sweets.

I'd prefer if she does the dishes and I cook, though.

[Anonymous No.5506330]

>>5506015

This.

[Anonymous No.5506360]

>>5505482
>>5506123
>>5505482
It sounds like this anon has never been in a relationship, is afraid of sexual practices that deviate from the recent cultural norm, and/or is in a relationship with a cold fish but doesn't want to acknowledge their lack of satisfaction with their love life out of a sense of guilt for wanting something more or different.

If cliched Hollywood missionary-style love scenes are your idea of the epitome of sex then that is your thing, but don't try to enforce your dreary views on others or try to make them feel bad for having some excitement in their lives.