[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking

View post   
File: 107 KB, 723x1080, C8C4B40B-5478-471E-81F9-EE870BB8F574.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20053055 No.20053055 [Reply] [Original]

>You can’t just put beans in chili and call it chili even though the original recipe used beans!

>> No.20053064

>the original recipe used beans
this statement is false.

>> No.20053065

>>20053055
>Chili
>A word deriving from Chilis con carne
>a dish consisting of solely chilis and meat
Go fuck yourself op, sage grows in my fields. Go back to school, stop shitting up my website on your winter break.

>> No.20053067

>>20053065
CHILI CON CARNE MEANS CHILI WITH BEANS CARNE MEANS MEAT THAT MEANS CHILI WAS MADE WITH BEANS YOU STUPID FUCK

>> No.20053069

>>20053064
The Indians had beans they called them the three sisters

>> No.20053077

>>20053069
this statement is also false.

>> No.20053080

>>20053067
Absolutely, undeniably, not true
(Verification not required.)

>> No.20053088

>>20053077
Just say Indians didn't exist, Anon, they were invented by the White Man and resurrected by the Mormons when they built Utah from scratch and old magic underwears

>> No.20053100

>>20053088
im saying beans don't exist, not indians.

>> No.20053102

>>20053080
Are you pretending to be retarded? Chili con carne CHILI WITH MEAT KEYWORD WITH THAT MEANS THAT CHILI DOESNT REQUIRE MEAT!

>> No.20053119

>>20053102
You will never be white

>> No.20053121

>>20053055
I genuinely can't believe there are people who fight over whether beans belong in chili or not
My family throws any fucking shit in there, beer, chocolate, half a can of coke, multiple types of beans, vodka sauce, lemon juice, anything spicy or pungent

>> No.20053122

>>20053119
I know I’m stuck as a Slav that doesn’t mean I’m wrong

>> No.20053130

>>20053055
>original recipe
>the Aztecs were stewing meat with chili peppers for God knows how long before the Spanish even showed up

>> No.20053133

I don't understand why certain foods attract autistic freaks who try to establish retarded, pedantic, prescriptivist bullshit like this

>> No.20053137

>>20053121
that sounds awesome

>> No.20053142

I like beans, I like chili, I like chili with beans, but chili without beans is better

>> No.20053143

>>20053133
A cheese burger is the exact same thing as a grilled cheese with ground beef

>> No.20053148

>>20053121
people who follow recipes when they make chili are the biggest cooklets in the world, chili is made my dumping meat and chili spices into a pot and then just adding everything in your fridge and pantry that sounds like it could work until the pot is full

>> No.20053166

>>20053148
Manlet take, enjoy being rejected by 99% of white women.

>> No.20053189

>>20053166
Big cope from the melanin rich cooklet, immediately comes in the "muh dick" when faced with the truth.

>> No.20053191

>>20053133
>cheeseburgers have pineapple
gfy faggot

>> No.20053205

>>20053064
>>20053065
>>20053077
>>20053080
>>20053143
>>20053166
>>20053191
Bro, get a job.

>> No.20053245

>>20053055
OP is entirely correct and it has people seething so hard. Lmao.
Imagine making chilli without beans. Enjoy ur terribly textured meat slop bro.

>> No.20053295

>>20053055
You're confused OP.
When people talk about chili they are actually talking about chili. Which as you know is a completely different dish than chili.
There are multiple dishes called chili.
These dishes may be similar but originated independently of each other and thus are their own unique dishes. It's got a kind of convergent evolution thing going on.

The chili that the vast majority of people eat today is descended from Texas style chili.
Early Texas style chili was most likely invented by immigrants from the Canary Islands in Austin, Texas.
This style of chili probably didn't feature beans or tomato. That's not to say adding beans, tomato, chocolate, cinnamon, or any other ingredient is wrong though. Food is constantly evolving. Tradition has no place in food unless you are specifically presenting it as being "traditional".
Even cooking with traditional recipes, much of the food you could make today would still taste quite different as the ingredients themselves have changed drastically over the last century.

>> No.20053321

Did beans rape your mom or?

>> No.20053324

>>20053295
>descended from Texas style chili
lies

>> No.20053336

>>20053321
They raped my ass with so much freaking gas!
But it was worth it.

>> No.20053346

>>20053245
If you have to add beans to your chili to give it texture then you've gone unsalvageably wrong from the start.

>> No.20053358

who gives a fuck. cook and eat whatever you want. you suffer from a case of letting the jew contaminate your brain and soul by creating division from your fellow man
>>>/x/
to learn how to exorcise yourself from that nasty spirit

>> No.20053706
File: 196 KB, 1875x1889, 1687909915867374.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20053706

>>20053205
mass repliers and racemixers will be killed first

>> No.20053709

>>20053706
unfunny washed out loser

>> No.20054083

>>20053346
I cant fathom your logic in saying this honestly. I can only imagine you are like FULLY delusional to the degree you are not even really attached to reality in any meaningful way

>> No.20054283

>>20054083
>I cant fathom your logic
That says a great deal about you, your middling intellect, and your consequent bizarre bean fetish, and says absolutely nothing about me.

>> No.20054291

>>20054283
not that anon but you're wrong. Enjoy your beanless tomato and beef stew

>> No.20054303

>>20054291
>tomato
Chili doesn’t have tomato either

>> No.20054413

>>20054291
>noooo you have to make sloppa like me
Chili doesn't have tomatos, fuckface.

>> No.20054423

>>20053088
This but unironically.

>> No.20054446

>Heckin beans!
>In a recipe
>From Mexico
I'm absolutely outraged. When do Mexicans eat beans? Or rice for that matter?

>> No.20054528

>>20053055
Only Texans care about beans in chili, and all Texans are fucking faggots.

>> No.20054623

>>20054446
If the Mexicans, who put beans in nearly everything, thought it important not to put beans in chili con carne, then that probably should be a clue that it's not supposed to have beans in it.

>> No.20054905

>>20054446
this is an awful take.

>> No.20055651

>>20054905
Probably just a side-effect of leptin poisoning.

>> No.20056322
File: 137 KB, 864x1000, Chad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20056322

>>20053055
I add beans because I like them. Simple as.

>> No.20056380

>>20054623
Has it ever occurred to you that maybe it wasn’t in the original recipe because it was so universally expected to put beans in it that they left it out? You’re telling me that no one decided to put beans in chili even though they used it as a meat substitute for literally everything else? Are you retarded?

>> No.20056486

>>20056322
you like beans because you're a beaner

>> No.20056512

>>20056380
oh you're an inbred sister fucker who's idea of "mexican food" begins and ends at taco bell.

>> No.20056525

>>20056512
What carb did they eat then retard?

>> No.20057090

>>20053055
The original recipe did not, in fact, use beans.