Peak Capitalism

[Anonymous No.19576922]

Using government assistance to buy a useless subscription...

[Anonymous No.19576924]

50% off sounds pretty good to me

[Anonymous No.19576950]

>>19576922
Amazon Prime has done the same thing for a while.
Weird since I was sure I was randomly offered Walmart+ for 50% off.

[Anonymous No.19576959]

>>19576922
>Peak capitalism
>Socialist programs

[Anonymous No.19577030]

>>19576959
Everyone who uses the term "capitalism" these days is retarded, yeah.

[Anonymous No.19577141]

Ah fuck, awesome. Thanks for the heads up OP.

[Anonymous No.19577165]

I'm a NEET, so I collect SNAP (food stamps), and there's a number of different benefits you can get from having that (indirectly). You can quality for discounted/free admission to some museums, also my city has electrified bike and stand-up scooter rentals and you get those mostly for free as well with the individual companies for showing your SNAP card.

[Anonymous No.19577167]

Maybe they should waste less money on government literacy classes for your dumb ass because that's not what the text in that image says OP

[Anonymous No.19577168]

>>19576950
Oh yeah, you don't get a discount on the individual items, but you do get 40% off the cost of renewing Amazon prime.

[Anonymous No.19577553]

>>19576959
>its not real capitalism when Walmart seeks money distributed by the state!
>its not real capitalism when Walmart underpays its employees knowing the government will food the bill!
>if we just got rid of the government, Walmart would turn its act around!

[Anonymous No.19577560]

I cancelled my garbage pickup and just dump my trash on walmart shopping carts and wagies take it inside and throw it out

thanks for the assist walmart

[Anonymous No.19577570]

>>19576959
The most ironic part is that OP is acting like he's so far above rampant capitalism, and yet here he is, shopping at Walmart nonetheless. For a lot of poor people they don't have a choice of where to shop, because Walmart put most small town grocery stores out of business 20 years ago by offering prices they couldn't compete with (and then raising them once there was no competition, obviously). If you have enough money to choose where you can shop, while looking down on people who need government assistance, and you still choose to support a shithole like Walmart (not just bad business practices, but a complete shithole), you are the problem.

[Anonymous No.19577687]

>>19577570
>le capitalism is le evil because disabled people can get groceries delivered for free instead of paying 10 dollars for it

I'M WITH COMMUNISM NOW

[Anonymous No.19577696]

what's w+?
t. non-burger

[Anonymous No.19577701]

>>19577696
I don't know
t. burger

[Anonymous No.19577707]

>>19577696
Free delivery (usually charged 7.50-9.99), special discounts on a couple hundred different items a week or month I forget when they rotate the items out, and a lot of basically cash-back deals on lots of items too. There are some other things like free paramount+ streaming but I don't know much about the non grocery related things it has, I think some xm radio bullshit and something about veterinarians. I dunno. I'm not a shill, I just use it because I have agoraphobia so I figured I'd answer.

[Anonymous No.19577734]

Poor people are so fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.19577811]

>>19577707
Whatever pussy

[Anonymous No.19577829]

>>19577811
Is it embarrassing that a poorfag parasite is living an easier better life than you and has wagies (like you) bringing him his food as if he were a king? Lol. seethe more.

[Anonymous No.19577836]

>>19577734
Well yes, that's the primary reason why they are poor.

[Anonymous No.19577844]

>>19577553
you're describing corporatism
capitalism is the exchange of goods and services, and a capitalist is someone that believes that's the best way for everybody to increase wealthy
when you have corporatism what you're doing is taking advantage of the good will of others to effectively steal from them by making unfair rules where only you can win

[Anonymous No.19577864]

>>19577687
>>19577707
>free delivery from store
first off you have to pay $6.99 if your order's below $35. second the drivers are paid shit just like other gig-economy workers, so they ask you to tip and if you don't there's a good chance your shit won't get delivered or will be fucked with

[Anonymous No.19577873]

>>19577864
First off, why are you ordering delivery for under $35? Get off your ass, even I don't do that, if I just need something that cheap I force myself to go in person. Second, I tip 2 bucks, in a small town most people tip 0 so I'm the 'big tipper' around here. I do like that your response to simply answering some european about 'what is walmart+' is to complain about semantical bullshit.

>b-b-b-but if you only order this much
>bub-b-b-buu-bu-b-but the TIP isn't free!!! AND YOU SHOULD TIP THESE POOR GIG WROKERS!!!! (I never said the tip is free)

Cuckold, go back to work LOL.

[no bump (still) No.19577978]

>>19576922
>Economically illiterate retard posts Economically illiterate retardation

[Anonymous No.19578025]

>>19577873
>First off, why are you ordering delivery for under $35?
my car broke down

[Anonymous No.19578104]

>>19577844
wrong, capitalism does not mean 'free market'
it refers to the arrangement of capital hoarders employing people to work their capital for wages
corporations are a defining feature of capitalism
successful businesses will always use their proceeds to secure their advantage and punish competitors, so the logical conclusion of unregulated competition is corruption and overregulation
your faggot economic ideologies aren't worth shit to anyone

[Anonymous No.19578113]

>>19578104
>capitalism isn't about the free market, it's about the accumulation of capital
Correct
>therefor corporations define capitalism
Nigger, wtf kind of non sequitur is that? For one, show me a political or economic structure in history that does not involve small groups of people hoarding power. Are you some kind of crypto-tard or something?

[Anonymous No.19578169]

>>19578113
He's right, power structures that result from ideology are more relevant than the pure ideals of it. Otherwise you'd be able to disconnect Soviet states from communism and go "well, that wasn't what communism is about". In the same way, corporate rule is definitional of capitalism. Arguing that consolidation of power is inevitable is not a denial of corporatism as being integral to capitalism, it's just a bad excuse for it.

[Anonymous No.19578186]

You can HAVE a capitalistic autocracy, in fact you can make a pretty good argument that China is one. And Korea's "corporations" are pretty much just plain oligarchies. We've already determine that capitalism isn't limited to free markets; corporations aren't the defining structure of capitalism, they're the defining structure of industry not being state-owned.

[Anonymous No.19578224]

>>19577864
>or will be fucked with
Why are Americans so petty? Always need to get revenge on some perceived injustice. Just suck it up and do your job

[Anonymous No.19578549]

>>19578224
when you're driving for delivery apps the base pay on orders are ridiculously low (ie $3.15 for 11 miles), and without a tip it's not even worth the gas
>don't accept the order then
>get a better job then
that's exactly what's happening in the pic from my last post lol

[Anonymous No.19578579]

Social services are based but the fact that they need to be duct taped into this failure of a government/corporate model will always make them unappealing.

[Anonymous No.19578643]

>>19577553
The government giving tax dollars to walmart is socialism, yes.

[Anonymous No.19578664]

>>19577873
>poor people should be allowed to get free walmart delivery using government assistance
>they should also be forced to spend $35 on their order, otherwise they should stop being disabled and get the groceries themselves

[Anonymous No.19578677]

>>19578579
That's honestly my number one argument against any kind of "socialism" in the USA. They will absolutely, 100% of the time, do it in the most retarded way possible. Like forcing you to buy private insurance then claiming they solved the problem.

[Anonymous No.19578695]

>>19578579
>>19578677
Top down never ever works. It's not even theoretically possible outside of some ai controlled humanity slave model. If you can't understand this you are retarded.

[Anonymous No.19578717]

>>19578695
All I know is that crime rates and drug use plummet when people have what they need to survive
>>19578677
Broken on purpose, why the fuck is there "insurance" anyway? More importantly why isn't it an automatic process? If I'm spending 100$ a month on protection I fucking expect you to protect me, my entire cancer treatment should be free, my medication should be free. It shouldn't be automatically denied before review because it's more cost effective.

[Anonymous No.19578728]

>>19578717
You make everything worse for everyone predicated on a lack of understanding and poor linear regressions.