[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 877 KB, 1140x543, ruby_the_4th_chocolate_content.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17815773 No.17815773 [Reply] [Original]

pick your chocolatefu

>> No.17815894

>>17815773
>pink chocolate
not again, i thought this stupid meme was dead

>> No.17815900

>>17815773
ruby tastes awful, just as bad as dark for me

>> No.17815901

>>17815894
>everything new to me is a meme

aren't you a little young to be suffering dementia

>> No.17816027

>>17815901
You must be 18 to post on this site

>> No.17816078
File: 7 KB, 217x208, 1642904810580.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17816078

>>17815900
>just as bad as dark for me

>> No.17816079

>>17816027
dementia confirmed. I hope you have a good caretaker.

>> No.17816113

>>17815773
>>17815901
Ruby chocolate is a meme, though.
>hurr, we didn't process our cocoa beans properly an now it tastes like unripe sour ass. LITERALLY THE FOURTH CHOCOLATE TYPE! OC (original chocolate) do not steal!
Callebaut can suck my fifth chocolate. Ruby chocolate as "a new type of chocolate" is marketing garbage

>> No.17816120

>>17816113
if white chocolate counts then there's literally no reason ruby shouldn't.
you're just grumpy that the world you live in no longer resembles your childhood.

>> No.17816137

>>17816120
>if white chocolate counts then there's literally no reason ruby shouldn't.
Yes there is, you fucking tard. White chocolate is still made with properly processed cocoa butter, the same cocoa butter used in other chocolates. Ruby chocolate uses fucked up beans and is completely unrelated to the white-to-dark spectrum of chocolates. It's not comparable and they're using a false equivalence as a marketing gimmick.

Go suck a cock.

>> No.17816173
File: 49 KB, 800x533, IMG_1443.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17816173

PS: the whole "hurr, white chocolate not real chocolate" thing was just a case of US FDA retardation with was corrected decades ago.
You may as well include blonde chocolate in your types of chocolate if you're including irrelevant crap like ruby.

>> No.17816186

>>17816137
why the homophobia

>> No.17816188

>>17815773
Give me the dark chocolate. And by dark I mean 70% cacao at least.

>> No.17816541
File: 317 KB, 500x373, 546234524354.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17816541

>>17815773
>chocolatefu

Just get in.

>> No.17816557

>>17815773
White Chocolate for life

>> No.17816574

>>17815773
White chocolate
>buh but its not REAL choc-
Don't give a shit, suck a cock.

>> No.17816578

>>17815773
Milk because I'm not a third worlder

>> No.17816581

>>17816173
Never heard of it, but a caramel-like white chocolate sounds heavenly

>> No.17816583
File: 26 KB, 400x462, 1424623164854.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17816583

>>17816113
>oh no this chocolate is not overroasted, adulterated with an alkali and conched for 72 hours to remove any possible origin flavor
>it's not real chocolate!!!
Imagine tasting a lightly roasted Ethiopian single-origin coffee for the first time, then complaining that it's shit because it's not "properly processed" by overroasting it, cutting it with robusta and spray-drying it into instant coffee. What you are tasting in ruby chocolate is some of the character of the raw cocoa bean, which you dislike because the actual flavor of cocoa is alien to you because you've been eating shitty mass produced chocolate your whole life which has been processed to the point where nothing of the original character remains.

>> No.17816620

>>17816583
You wan't to eat underprocessed raw cocoa beans, you go right the fuck ahead. Just don't put it in the same group as typical chocolates in a shitty marketing ploy.
We're agreeing here: they AREN'T the same thing.

>> No.17817605

>>17816557
>>17816574
>14+1 whole posts until my chocolatefu got claimed
I was close. White chocolate gang.

>> No.17817843
File: 48 KB, 577x629, 1429242347870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17817843

>>17815773
MILK CHOCOLATE

>> No.17817857

>>17817605
To be fair, that was only the second post that gave an answer.

>> No.17819816

>>17815773
Dark>Milk>>>>>>White.
Never had ruby chocolate. I assumed it was just fruit mixed with white. But its bit more interesting than that. I'll have to try it sometime.

>> No.17821102
File: 62 KB, 1183x1492, 1621306188086.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17821102

>>17816583
now the concept of coffee being over-roasted hiding origin characteristics is something that i actually believe and act on when i buy beans. What if any practical difference is there between the process of natural coffee and this pink chocolate? ill try it if thats what youre saying.

I struggle to drink even "medium" roasted coffee for how much it tastes of carbon and smoke. this is coming from someone who actually smokes, too.

>> No.17821114

>>17816620
you seem too upset to take seriously. I classify white chocolate as a chocolate product, exactly the same as milk or dark, since they ALL require by-products of processed cacao. you have established goal-posts for a semantical contest that has no substance.

>> No.17821169

>>17821114
Allow me to put it this way: the white-to-dark spectrum of chocolate is akin to how much cream or sugar one takes in their coffee. It is a completely different scale. Putting ruby in it arbitrarily is inappropriate and nothing more than a marketing gimmick. There are MANY types of chocolate and ways to process it, just like there are more than three types of coffee beans. Pink as the "fourth type of chocolate" on the white-to-dark spectrum is disingenuous horseshit.

>> No.17821200

>>17816173
I prefer my Chocolate blonde and blue eyed.

>> No.17821216
File: 50 KB, 750x504, 1619451327005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17821216

>>17821169
seeing the filename now, i submit that "the" fourth kind is an inappropriate distinction. it can very easily be "a" fourth kind of chocolate depending on point of reference, and order in which you count.
I'd assert that if the pink stuff has milk in its recipe anywhere, then it goes on the spectrum. not sure where to put though.

>> No.17821248

>>17815773
For me, it's Ruby. The finest of the chocolates. :^)
The only people who don't like Ruby have never had it processed into a worthy bar or truffle. Shame.

>> No.17821271

>>17821216
>I'd assert that if the pink stuff has milk in its recipe anywhere, then it goes on the spectrum.
this is the most retarded thing i've ever heard. do you think cheese is the fifth kind of chocolate?

>> No.17821272

>>17819816
>>17821248
https://delysia.com/shop/ruby-collection-chocolate-truffles/
>NOOOO I CAN'T AFFORD A $36 EXPERIENCE, THAT'S LIKE $4 PER TRUFFLE WTFFF.
See anon, while you were busy fapping and playing PUBG, I asked for an extra 2 hours of overtime. That more than paid for this little culinary excursion I decided to venture upon.
Sometimes it's hard to be so patrician... but not really. :^)
I think that after our little exchange I'll do some floor workouts and then perhaps enjoy some musical pieces with a cup of coffee. You'll roll off of your bedmat that is situated on the floor, and then make the journey to Taco Bell in your cramped vehicle, eventually spending over $15 at the fast food establishment, gaining no nutrients or sustenance, and having little to show for it.

>> No.17821278

>>17816620
>>17816583
All I was saying is that it was a marketing technique and nothing more. It's a meme because it's being perpetuated to change your perception of reality.

>> No.17821295

>>17821278
The same could be said of many products in this age. It's not merely just some coloring or flavoring though, it's the result of a natural process and in fact the result of tampering with the product less.
>I care how products are marketed
You are still in the intellectual gutter then. I'm sure you've seen some Coconut waters that are pink by now. If they begin to call it "Ruby Coconut Water" I don't care. Look beyond the words and into the process anon.
Or fall by the wayside.

>> No.17821362
File: 35 KB, 525x384, 1616247878827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17821362

>>17821271
what a terrible attempt at wit, and a sad use of your time. in which cheese recipes does one ever put cacao, you imbecile?
you have projected your own foolishness onto my words. if you had read more carefully, you'd realize that this conversation has been about chocolate, and maybe coffee; both sourced from processed beans.
you are the only person talking about cheese. are you this strange around your family?

>> No.17821437

>>17816583
>adulterated with an alkali
They use citric acid to make pink chocolate lol, that's why people say it tastes fruity

>> No.17821445

Milk > white > ruby > dark

>> No.17821446

>>17815773
Pink chocolate is a scam. Don't be a sucker for a marketing gimmick.

>> No.17821490

im gonna consider ruby chocolate a fourth kind just to piss this guy off

>> No.17821516

>>17821446
>always dreamed about pink chocolate
>it becomes real on the literal sense of the word
>dont live your dreams anon they r a scam
fuck you

>> No.17821517

>>17821272
>he worked overtime to be able to afford it
man I didn't even look at the price, I just bought it, ate it and thought it was shit
I guess if you're too poor to just buy what you want without thinking about it you have to pretend it's worth the cost?

keeping up with the joneses really kills niggas, huh

>> No.17821545

>>17816113
you'd not be trolling if there weren't a specific, pink cocoa bean that ruby chocolate is supposed to come from. you'd really be trolling if you argued its very real artificial scarcity. go to amazon and add it to your cart, then wait until the end of its season and see how much overall is left.

>> No.17821586

>>17821545
>Gullible faggot

>> No.17821593

>>17821545
Yeah and diamonds are rare you fuckin rube.

>> No.17821641

>>17821593
>>17821586
ah, does reality hurt? eat my ass nigga.

>> No.17821652

>>17821641
Imma flick your moms pink cocoa bean now fuck off.

>> No.17821679

>>17816079
18+

>> No.17821690

>>17816186
Why the nigger brains that fill your head? Why anything you stupid fucking moron.

>> No.17821694

>>17821690
why the racismus?

>> No.17821924

>>17817605
Sharing's caring

>> No.17821928

Unsweetened raw choco.

>> No.17822124
File: 328 KB, 552x592, 1651631830588.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17822124

>>17815900
>just as bad as dark
It disgusts me knowing I share this board with people like you

>> No.17822140

>>17815773
I tried the pink chocolate and wasnt really impressed with the flavor. Maybe my brain is wired to think its going to taste like strawberry.

>> No.17822174

>>17815901
Kek thats a good one m8

>> No.17822623

>>17821517
You don't need to pretend anon. We all know you haven't tried real ruby chocolate. The only people who don't like ruby chocolate are the ones who haven't tasted it!

>> No.17822644

I won't touch anything under 85% cocoa
and I only say 85% because I'm a poorfag
and depending on stores I get filtered off
my prefered 90/95% dark. But when it's on sale,
I get the highest I can find.
Anything under 85% and I can physically taste and sense that I am eating a solidified paste of sugar.

>> No.17823439

>>17816173
i want some

>> No.17823443

>>17821102
you ever tried the yellow coffee made by the saudis? you might enjoy it. word of advice though, only drink the one cup

>> No.17823467

>>17821278
>marketers in a viral marketing thread talking about the process of the product they are marketing being marketed
living in the future fucking sucks

>> No.17823490

>>17816113
>OC do not steal!
take me back bros
I don't like this brave new world