[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking

View post   
File: 283 KB, 438x728, NoWeddingCakesHere.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13419089 No.13419089[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Has anyone here tried it? It's probably a low margin business but then you have places like Lady M who sell crepe cakes starting at 80 bucks.

I know it is a lot of work but if you are passionate about making food, surely it must be worth it.

There's a lot of bakeries that are just about fancy decoration and the taste of the baked goods is merely average at best and the service is diffident, even hostile, and I want to be known for selling delicious food to anyone who can afford it, not just to people who's lives I personally approve of.

>> No.13419091

>>13419089
Nah. It's easy m8.

>> No.13419097

>>13419089
You sound like an idiot, I'm sure you'll lose a fuckton of money

>> No.13419101

>>13419089
It probably depends a lot on your location and legal jurisdiction. Hell man just the licensing fees to start up a place is like near a million USD.

>> No.13419102

>>13419089
>There's a lot of bakeries that are just about fancy decoration and the taste of the baked goods is merely average at best and the service is diffident, even hostile, and I want to be known for selling delicious food to anyone who can afford it, not just to people who's lives I personally approve of.
So you'll be doing the opposite of what Democrats do, and charge men, or Republicans more?

>> No.13419106

>>13419102
>and not

>> No.13419107

>>13419089
One thing that I've read and seems to strike a chord is never use your own money, get investors.

>> No.13419117

>>13419089
I've seen a Reddit thread where a woman buys bulk cake mix to make her cakes and she got a shit ton of money for her "amazing" cakes. She later quit the business because she got married and became a housewife

>> No.13419123

>>13419089
Spam social media, insane customer service, present everything in a perfectly cozy and clean environment and you're gucci.

It has to be perfectly instagrammable, and little bit better than good in terms of flavor.

>> No.13419128

>>13419102
I would charge everyone the same price. I want to serve all customers who enter my bakery in good faith equitably.

>> No.13419131

>>13419089
Don't expect it to work the first time.
This Monty Python quote seems to apply...
When I first came here, this was all swamp. Everyone said I was daft to build a castle on a swamp, but I built in all the same, just to show them. It sank into the swamp. So I built a second one. And that one sank into the swamp. So I built a third. That burned down, fell over, and then sank into the swamp. But the fourth one stayed up. And that’s what you’re going to get, Son, the strongest castle in all of England.

>> No.13419138

>>13419089
You should open your bakery in a black neighborhood.

>> No.13419147

>>13419138
If in a large city there will be a lot of competition, a lot.

>> No.13419148

>>13419138
Name a single existing from-scratch bakery currently operating in the US in a mostly Black neighborhood.

>> No.13419152

>>13419148
Does that include chicken joints?

>> No.13419155

>>13419148
OPs could be the first. Black folks like sweets, so I'm sure she'll get a lot of customers.

>> No.13419170

>>13419155
They have to have money to sustain a bakery. Blacks suffered historically through slavery and segregation and are still widely oppressed which keeps them economically depressed so it's hard to sustain businesses in areas where they predominate.

>> No.13419219

>>13419170
>Blacks suffered historically through slavery
Yea. Muslims were pretty rough on them. Good thing they finally abolished slavery a couple years ago.

>> No.13419236

>>13419219
I don't think most American slave owners were Muslim. Systemic oppression, formal and visible, or otherwise, has continued well since the extinguishing of slavery itself.

>> No.13419246

>>13419236
You're only hyperfocused on a single aspect of the Muslim slave trade anon.
Someone had to capture, dehumanize black people, and sell them to themselves, and YT.

>> No.13419279

>>13419246
There were plenty of Christians involved in the slave trade. Nice whataboutism.

>> No.13419297

>>13419279
>there where plenty of Christians
We only hear about the Christians, and white pepo though.
>Nice whataboutism.
It only becomes whataboutism when we start mentioning who else was, and still is involved in slavery.

>> No.13419304

>>13419297
Because the majority of slave owners in America were white Christians.

>> No.13419311

>>13419304
And they bought they majority of slaves from Muslims, arabs, and blacks.

>> No.13419327

>it’s probably a low margin business
good...
>but
here it comes
>i see ALL these bakeries selling mediocre trash for $1000 and mine would be totally different! i’m sure people would flock to pay $1000 for my delicious pastries that my chain smoking, alcoholic redneck family all claim are the best pastries ever
why is every delusional entrepreneur thread like this? how old are you op? 17?

>> No.13419337

>>13419089
The only job other than dairy farming you get out of bed at 4 in the morning.

>> No.13419342

is there a cooperative kitchen where you live? good way to test the water without huge overhead cost

>> No.13419344

>>13419311
And?

>>13419327
Well there are a lot of bakeries that just care about decoration and don't care much about the flavor or the quality of the baking or go for gimmicks like gluten free or vegan. A modern bakery where everything is from scratch made with quality, local, fresh, seasonal ingredients is pretty rare and thus accords a premium.

>> No.13419352

>>13419344
have you ever worked in a bakery

>> No.13419358

>>13419344
but OP is saying that he'll make his products affordable

>> No.13419360

>>13419344
>And?
And you should get into the habit of mentioning that, so people can have a better understanding of how Islamic slavery affected black people... or are you a racist?

>> No.13419366

>>13419358
Where did you see anything about affordable in the original post?

>> No.13419367

>>13419358
OP is more of a bad ideas guy, and not into numbers, or reality, and stuff.

>> No.13419370

>>13419366
>I want to be known for selling delicious food to anyone who can afford it

>> No.13419382

>>13419370
anyone who can afford it implies that not everyone can afford it you moron

>> No.13419397

>>13419367
Well, has anyone here actually tried it and has any relevant numbers?

>> No.13419429

>>13419397
/ck/ is more of a jollebee board. Try /biz/.

>> No.13419477

>>13419429
>Try /biz/
Oh, yeah, I forgot about that bastion of information where 90% of threads attempt to convince you to sell some financial instrument they've shorted.

>> No.13419478

>>13419397
no, because it’s a retarded shitty idea and as >>13419367 said, you’re just a bad ideas guy
no one looks for an ideas guy in the first place, but you’re worse
bakeries operate around high volume if they want to profit
you have to sell 20+ artisan bread loaves an hour just to hit $100/hour in sales
that applies for anything in the store
then you factor in the hours it takes to make everything
then you factor in the extremely high costs of commercial baking equipment
then you factor in the reality of your baked goods (much like your ideas) being garbage and no one wanting them

>> No.13419517

>>13419478
not, bread

creative, seasonal pastries

>bakeries operate around high volume if they want to profit

or specialize into producing high end goods with a higher individual margin

>> No.13419535

>>13419517
and how much are you going to sell each pastry for bud

>> No.13419583

>>13419517
>high end goods
Such as what? Golden cupcakes made from flamingo eggs?

>> No.13419588

>>13419535
The fancy crepe cake place sells slices for $9 a piece.

I've never been to a bakery that has seasonal fruit desserts. Arctic kiwi in Oct/Nov, gooseberry in June/July, etc.

>>13419583
no, fresh pastries with local fruit made from scratch

>> No.13419603

>>13419588
>no, fresh pastries with local fruit made from scratch
Do you have the ability, and financial means to do this?

>> No.13419610

>>13419588
and now how many $9 crepes per hour will you have to sell to make $100 an hour
have you ever worked in a bakery?

>> No.13419612

>>13419603
yes

>> No.13419618

>>13419612
Cool. Then what's the problem?

>> No.13419626

My cousin opened a pastry place a few years ago. He said he barely broke even until like 3 years after he started it due to competition and the like but now it’s very popular. However he has a fantastic work ethic and was going in at like 5AM and coming home at 9PM every fucking day I’m shocked he didn’t shoot himself after a few months of that.

>> No.13419628

>>13419618
Just curious if anyone else here has experience starting their own food-related business.

>> No.13419639

>>13419628
Yea. I own a bakery.

>> No.13419666

>>13419639
Do you rotate what items you sell seasonally?

Do you buy from local farmers?

>> No.13419672

>>13419666
>Do you rotate what items you sell seasonally?
Nah. I just launder money, because bakeries don't make money if it isn't a front.

>> No.13419680

>>13419672
I also paint houses.

>> No.13419691

If you want a proper food business in the first world you have to get a bunch of permits and follow regulations, pay taxes etc. All that will require a considerable investment and usually low profits. Those Mexicans/Arabs selling random food on the street actually make bank because they aren't cucked by the gubmint.

>> No.13419706

>>13419691
>Those Mexicans/Arabs selling random food on the street actually make bank because they aren't cucked by the gubmint.
They have permits, and they're part of a huge collective that sets them up.

>> No.13419708

>>13419672
>>13419680
This is joke, of course.

>> No.13419709

>>13419672
What's it a front for?

>> No.13419720

>>13419706
This, every single Mexican and Arab in the US and Europe selling food has a permit. Every single one. There's no way those people would work informally

>> No.13419749

>>13419720
Roughly how much are the permits?

>> No.13419755

>>13419749
I was being ironic, obviously there are Mexicans and Arabs selling food without permits out there. That other guy is either mentally ill or incredibly sheltered probably home schooled and helmet and diaper wearing

>> No.13419763

>>13419749
Iirc it's $150 for the corn, and ice cream sellers. They have a network that set each other up, and they split money with whoever is in charge.

>> No.13419766

>>13419749
@ tree fitty

>> No.13419776

>>13419755
I don't know anything about the Arabs, but the Mexicans actually have permits at least now, and I'm only talking about my city.

>> No.13419784

>>13419766
You know, some people come here to actually have meaningful discussions with others.

>> No.13419824
File: 177 KB, 1024x740, KKYE02D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13419824

>>13419089

>> No.13419849
File: 379 KB, 666x940, GenGay.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13419849

>>13419824
>It's ok for Christians to be bullies as long as they aren't physically violent

imagine believing this horseshit and wondering why you are losing the culture wars.

>> No.13419863

>>13419849
Next time ask the Muslim guy to bake your gay cake.

>> No.13419884

>>13419863
There aren't very many Muslim owned bakeries in the U.S.

If a gay couple had filed a complaint against a Muslim bakery and the bakery won because they are Muslim, whereas a Christian bakery was made to behave differently, you would have a point, but otherwise the strawman doesn't work.

There are no examples of gay couples asking Muslim bakeries for wedding cakes, getting turned down, and filing official complaints, that I know of.

>> No.13419890

>>13419884
You'd get thrown off of a cliff if you asked a Muslim bakery, and yes there where a few Muslim bakeries that the gay couple avoided.

>> No.13419897

>>13419890
And a huge number of secular bakeries. If I recall, the bakery they went to was the only Christian bakery in town. It's almost like they had an ulterior motive...

>> No.13419917

>>13419897
They also forget all the Muslim bakeries, and florists that refused to sell to gay people in the US during the time.

>> No.13419931

>>13419884
>that I know of
You didn't try hard enough, or you just feigned ignorance.

>> No.13419932

>>13419897
>If I recall, the bakery they went to was the only Christian bakery in town.

They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious. They picked it because it was close to the location of their planned wedding reception.

You sir, are fake news.

>> No.13419945
File: 37 KB, 640x343, 1559925062078.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13419945

>>13419932
>They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious.
Because that's what CNN said, right? It was just a strange coincidence, and so they filed a federal case over it, like any normal person would do.

>> No.13419950

>>13419932
>They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious.
You're full of shit.

>> No.13419959

>>13419945
They did not file a federal case. They filed a complaint with the appropriate state board.

>>13419950
feel free to prove otherwise

you are the one claiming they knew he was religious ahead of time, feel free to cite sources supporting your argument

>> No.13419962

>>13419945
>>13419950
>ORANGE NEWS GOOOOD
Just say you secretly desire cock in your mouth and get over it

>> No.13419965

>>13419931
Ok, show where even F(au)x News or retarded Breitbart reported a muslim bakery turning down a gay couple. I'll wait until hell freezes over.

>> No.13419971

>>13419959
You claimed that the fags didn't know, so prove that to the supreme court.

>> No.13419985

>>13419971
>It's almost like they had an ulterior motive...

still not seeing any proofs whatsoever they targeted the bakery or knew the owner was Christian at the time

have fun being this worried because gay people exist and don't want to be humiliated in public by creepy busybody bullies

>> No.13419989

>>13419985
>Not baking you a cake is humiliating and bullying
Man, I am so glad I'm not as fragile as you.

>> No.13419992

They should've asked a Muslim bakery to bake them a Muhammad face cake.

>> No.13419994

>>13419989
They were deliberately singled out for their sexual orientation in a public setting.

>> No.13419996

>>13419989
No you're even more fragile to get offended that other people have consensual sex

>> No.13419997

>>13419994
You can't be "singled out" when you voluntarily choose to go into the place of business.

>> No.13420002

>>13419985
Burdon of proof is on you to prove this
>>13419932
>They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious

>> No.13420015

>>13420002
>>13419897
>It's almost like they had an ulterior motive...
Its actually on you, dumbass

>> No.13420017

>>13419997
Having no idea they would be treated differently for being gay.

>> No.13420022

>>13419994
>public setting
It was on private property.

>> No.13420023

>>13420017
>Go into obviously Christian store
>Ask them to make two men fucking on a cake
Yeah, they had NOOOO idea.

>> No.13420031

>>13420022
The business is open to the public. Anyone may enter the business. That makes it a public accommodation.

>>13420023
>obviously Christian

how?

>>Ask them to make two men fucking on a cake

They never discussed what the cake would even be like.

>> No.13420032

>>13420023
>obviously christian
According to you
>Ask them to make two men fucking on a cake
Your desired projection, not reality

>> No.13420034

>>13420015
Not my comment retard, but I agree with that anon. It seems like they singles the one Christian bakery out, instead of going to any of the other businesses.

>> No.13420036

>>13420031
>They never discussed what the cake would even be like.
Have a source for that, since you're making claims now?

>> No.13420037

>>13419994
good

>> No.13420039

>>13419997
They have to bake the cake no matter their retarded beliefs about the lifestyle of the couple if they want to continue in business. This is the same shit the right pulled during Jim Crow where they claimed their jew sky pilot book supported apartheid. You guys need to get another sword to fall on, you lost ok?

>> No.13420042

>>13420039
They didn't refuse to make them a cake. They refused to make a specific cake the gays asked for.

>> No.13420043

>>13420034
It doesn't matter if its your comment you fucking idiot, that just makes it worse since you're jumping into a discussion and don't even know the context. The original implication was that they had an ulterior motive as if they intentionally picked a "Christian baker" you moron.

>> No.13420046

>>13420036
That part at least is established in the official court documents.

https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-111-op-bel-colo-app.pdf

They did not get to discussing what would be on the cake.

>>13420042
They didn't ask for a specific cake. He said he doesn't make wedding cakes for gay couples.

A business open to the public must serve the general public.

>> No.13420058

>>13420036
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-111-op-bel-colo-app.pdf

>> No.13420061

>>13420031
>The business is open to the public.
They weren't denied entry. The owner refused the the job of making a lewd cake not entry to his establishment.
>>13420015
>almost as if they had an ulterior motive
This was an opinion based on interpretation of what was presented. (No proof needed)
>>13419932
>They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious.
This is presented as a fact, so provide proof.

>> No.13420070

i have to side with the christcucks here desu, i would never take any business from two men pretending to be a man and a woman.

>> No.13420077

>>13420061
They were denied service. This is like claiming that Blacks in segregated south weren't denied ENTRY to restaurants, they just weren't allowed to sit or be served food.

A public accommodation offers services to the public. Have you tried actually reading the court case? They answer basically every claim you are trying to make.

There was nothing lewd about the cake.

>> No.13420083

>>13420061
>This was an opinion based on interpretation of what was presented. (No proof needed)
Is also a claim. You can stop pretending to be some champion of the philosophical and actually substantiate a single one of your claims

>> No.13420085

>>13420043
No. The problem is that you're so erratic, and emotional right now that you can not keep up with the thread.
Anons comment was made to me, and you were the one who latched on to it like a parasite.

>> No.13420091

>>13420085
>no you!!!
Great argument. Still doesn't detract from the fact you made the original implication they had an ulterior motive.

>> No.13420097

>>13420083
It was an opinion. Now stop running away from having to prove your claim you dumb faggot.
>There was nothing lewd about the cake
Proof.
The rest of your post was also dumb bullshit, so I'll ignore that.

>> No.13420114

>>13420097
"Craig and Mullins promptly left
Masterpiece without discussing with Phillips any details of their
wedding cake. "

from the link in

>>13420058

They never discussed what would be on the cake and nobody is disputing that except you.

>> No.13420121

>>13420097
Keep backpedaling retard.

>> No.13420124

>>13420091
>no you!!!
You're gay brain is broken.
>Great argument.
This isn't an argument. You're being too emotional, and your going into a loop without answering any questions, or providing evidence to back your claims.
>Still doesn't detract from the fact you made the original implication they had an ulterior motive.
Again that opinion wasn't made by me.

>> No.13420139

>>13420121
You can't just post phrases that you've read on /ck/ anon. At least try to not look like a fool when you post.
Also let's get back to the topic.
Can you provide proof of your claim:
>>13419932
>They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious.

>> No.13420143

>>13420124
>You're
Your virgin brain is steaming
>This isn't an argument
No shit, dumbass.
>Again that opinion wasn't made by me.
It evidently was since you keep whiteknighting the """opinion""" you dumb fuck. That's still not the point, idiot.

>> No.13420152

>>13420139
>You can't just post phrases that you've read on /ck/ anon. At least try to not look like a fool when you post.
Cringe. Imagine you put this much effort into substantiating your claims such as "they had an ulterior motive"

>> No.13420164

i could have sworn there was a time when this board wasn't 75% /pol/ tier discussions

>> No.13420182

>>13420143
>>13420143
>>13420152
>Useless fag still has no argument.
This can't progress until you provide proof of your claim.
>>13419932 #
>They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious

>> No.13420184

>>13420164
Its happened in the past couple years. Shitposters from /tv/, /v/, and /int/ found a funny slow board with poor moderation to shitpost on so they came here en masse

>> No.13420189

>>13420182
Sorry as you claimed, there is a burden of proof, and is dependent on your virgin ass substantiating their "ulterior motive" >>13419897

>> No.13420193

>>13420164
The faggots come here with /leftypol/ bait, because they get destroyed in /pol/.

>> No.13420197

>>13420193
Evidently not since you're here bitching and not substantiating your point.

>> No.13420199

>>13420182
The couple said they had no idea Phillips sought to operate his business consistent with this Christian beliefs, nor that he had a policy of refusing wedding cakes to same-sex couples.

https://www.washingtonblade.com/2017/11/21/meet-the-gay-couple-at-the-center-of-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case/

>> No.13420202

>>13420189
So you can't back up your claim that's fine.

>> No.13420207

>>13420202
Oh you can't back up any of your claims? So sorry to hear, thankfully facts don't care about your feelings. >>13420199

>> No.13420225 [DELETED] 

>>13420199
>trannynews for trannyfaggots
Your source is biased you dumb fag.
Weren't you having a fake period over biased sources like
>Faux news, and breitbart
You fucking disgusting mentally ill waste of space.

>> No.13420229

>>13420225
Awww, triggered little incel. Try again next time.

>> No.13420232

>>13420207
Delete your tranny propaganda you fucking hypocrite.
Gay hypocrite.
Fat gay hypocrite with gay double standards.

>> No.13420241 [DELETED] 
File: 17 KB, 675x768, vspl2uy9six31.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13420241

>>13420232
>Delete your tranny propaganda you fucking hypocrite. Gay hypocrite. Fat gay hypocrite with gay double standards

>> No.13420249

>>13420229
You still don't have credible proof, so stop acting smug you gay bastard, because I could always bring up biased sources that would make you an hero.

>> No.13420255
File: 404 KB, 1000x808, 0tsydt6jq8u21.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13420255

>>13420241
>

>> No.13420259

>>13420249
>IT DOESNT COUNT REEEEEEEEEEEE
Triggered pissbabby
>because I could always bring up biased sources
Kek, you haven't brought up a single source for anything you've said, virgin.

>> No.13420262

Why couldn’t they have just gone to another bakery instead?

>> No.13420264

>>13420262
BIGOTY! BULLYING!

>> No.13420267

>>13419304
>Majority
Now do per capita

Spoiler alert: it's the Jews again.

>> No.13420269

>>13420262
Why can't just get laid instead of discriminating against people who do?

>> No.13420270

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-masterpiece-cakeshop-baker-jack-phillips-sued-anti-lgbtq-trans-20190612-l7pavnk4djhxlmx4or3aqcvibq-story.html
>Notorious anti-gay Colorado cake baker sued for discrimination for third time
>The owner of a specialty cakes shop in Lakewood, Co. is under fire for refusing to sell a cake to a trans woman,
The faggots are literally targeting this straight Christian man.

>> No.13420273

>>13420262
They literally did.

Would you ask Black students to just attend another school further away because the closest one is segregated? Same principle really.

Why is it their burden to be inconvenienced because of who they are?

>>13420270
and yet he's still in business

>> No.13420274

>>13420270
As he should be. Stay triggered.

>> No.13420281

>>13420255
Hey have you found those sources yet or are you still crying about your opinion debacle?

>> No.13420328

So, anyone here operate a bakery?

>> No.13420330

>>13419279
Slavery was a jewish business.

>> No.13420337

>>13420328
Yes. If a Christian asks for a wedding cake I spit and sneeze in it.

>> No.13420339

>>13420337
Seems sort of pointless. They wouldn't even notice.

>> No.13420351

>>13420281
No there weren't any credible sources for
>>13419932 # #
>They had no idea the owner of the bakery was religious
So we are at an impasse.

>> No.13420359

>>13420337
You be arrested for attempted murder by aids.

>> No.13420363

>>13420359
Imagine if we could actually murder all the gay-hating Christcucks with AIDS. That would be fucking glorious. Too bad HIV is no longer a death sentence!

>> No.13420369

>>13420363
You'd be better off behind bars terrorist.

>> No.13420377

>>13420369
If only we could actually jail Christians for being disrespectful assholes. Guess we are stuck dreaming online. Oh well, at least he't not making any money off wedding cakes anymore.

>> No.13420378

>>13420363
I can kind of understand why some people would probably want to bash you now.

>> No.13420385

>>13420351
“The only reason that we chose Masterpiece Cakeshop was it was in close proximity to our reception restaurant,” Craig said. “The person helping us plan that had used them in the past.”

https://www.denverpost.com/2018/06/04/charlie-craig-david-mullins-whats-next/

>> No.13420389

>>13420377
One us attempted murder, and the other is free speech.
Maybe the Christians are right about the gays after all.

>> No.13420397

>>13420389
Baking a cake is no more free speech than serving a cake at a diner. If you won't serve Blacks, gays, or any other legally protected group, you will end up in trouble.

Maybe try reading the actual legal opinions of real judges where they use words to counter your ridiculous arguments. Y'all act like nobody has ever thought of any counter-argument to the tired stuff you keep repeating.

>> No.13420398

>>13420270
Why are the lgbt community still harassing this man?

>> No.13420403

>>13420397
Gays shouldn't be protected anymore.
You dumb faggots are using your status to harras, and target good people.

>> No.13420405

>>13420269
>>13420273
Whatever happened to “what goes on in the bedroom, stays in the bedroom”? Now we’re literally being forced to accept it.

>> No.13420409

>>13420405
>Now we’re literally being forced to accept it.
Not if they keep it up.

>> No.13420410

>>13420398
Because he goes out of his way to harass gay people who enter his shop.

>>13420403
Oh yeah like Christians and other straight people never use their status to harass and target gay people lol. Such ironic hypocrisy.

>>13420405
I would argue privacy is at the center of gay people's rights to be treated equitably in public.

If you respect our privacy, you should have no problem engaging in business with us.

>> No.13420411

>>13420351
You haven't provided a source for any of your claims, this isn't an impasse but an exercise of your small dick humiliation

>> No.13420454

>>13420411
based, also nice dubs

>> No.13420490

>>13419089
my classmate opened one last year with his gf at 21 so it's not impossible.

>> No.13420501

>>13420328
There is one. Hes posted lots. Check archives because this thread is a dumpster fire.

>> No.13420518

>>13420501
Do you blame the gays or the Christians for that?

>> No.13420544

here's the problem with bakeries
the one by my house sells an apple pie for about $35, and it isn't any better than the apple pie the grocery store makes for under $10

>> No.13420560

>>13419117
You should stay off reddit. Its not good for the mind.

>> No.13420584

>>13419089
the only way a new startup bakery can make worthwhile money is if you actually own the property. if so you can sell good shit cheaper while still making a bigger profit than if you were paying half your revenue on rent. location also matters a lot.

>> No.13421335

>>13420193
Thats obviously untrue because literally everyone hates /pol/tards, regardless of race, gender or religion, even though you larping faggots like to pretend that youre the only white male christians left.

>> No.13421341

>>13421335
>literally everyone
speak for yourself roastie

>> No.13421528
File: 29 KB, 657x527, 48451568974.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13421528

>another cakefag bait thread to "own the homophobes"
take your moral crusade somewhere else

>> No.13422168

>>13419102
Why was this comment necessary? Think about something else for once

>> No.13422173

>>13421341
Literally everyone. Have consensual sex.

>> No.13422184

in b4 300 posts on a not-even-/ck/ thread

>> No.13422228

>>13421528
>take your moral crusade somewhere else
>not another custom cake wah!
well which is it?

>> No.13422245

>>13422228
their hypocrisy is astounding and they have an intellectual blindspot to avoid addressing it directly

look how that guy kept demanding sources, making claims without sources himself, then when sources were provided, disappeared

this isn't about making rational points, this is the verbal equivalent of banging on pots and pans loudly

What actually happens to them if they make custom cakes for gays? Nothing. This was never about that. This is about their right to denigrate and demean gay people in public settings for daring to date the same sex openly.

>> No.13422283

>>13422184
Oh yeah feel free to head on over to a fast food thread to post high quality shit man:

>>13422109

>>13422241

>> No.13422323

Why are Christians so triggered about having to serve gay people like they would straight people? Do they think segregation is still in effect and they can treat them like Black people in the 1950s?

>> No.13422367

>>13422323
because they fear having to actually be honest for once

>> No.13422380

>>13422323
Even if you remove the gay aspect and the religious aspect why must I be required to serve anyone I don't wanna. The public can choose not to come to my establishment if they don't like my practices which would drive me out of business. I don't see why the government has any right in that decision.

>> No.13422399

>>13422380
Because you are operating a business open to the general public that serves as an amenity to the general public. Meaning, you don't choose your clientele. Look up the history and meaning of public accommodation for further info.

> if they don't like my practices which would drive me out of business

the whole point is that gay people are less than 5% of the population so the state has to intervene to act on their behalf because they are not a potent majority force on their own. C'mon, try answering your own questions for once. These are not new questions and people have answered them in much more depth than I am giving before.

>> No.13422404

>>13419932
Absolute horseshit, they went through the phone book until they found a bakery that wouldn't make it.

>> No.13422412

>>13422404
Proofs?

>> No.13422443

>>13422323
>Why are Christians so triggered about having to serve gay people like they would straight people?

If they had asked for a straight cake, like a straight person, they would have gotten it. They chose to not do so, and ask for a product that the bakery does not sell.

>> No.13422447

>>13422443
The bakery sells custom wedding cakes. The problem was them being gay.

>> No.13422466

>>13422399
I should be free to tell fags to fuck off.

>> No.13422468

>>13422399
This makes no sense as there are plenty of people who sell public services open to everyone that refuse to do certain things. Like street artists which refuse to draw nudity and so on.