/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.13344813]

Why do fast food chains that openly endorse their Christian beliefs serve evidently superior food than secular food companies?

Is it because the teachings of Christ condemn serving inferior food to guests?

[Anonymous No.13344818]

>>13344813
Protestants aren't Christians.

[Anonymous No.13344817]

Examples: Chick-Fil-A and In-N-Out

[Anonymous No.13344825]

>>13344818
This, get fucked prozzies

[Anonymous No.13344826]

>>13344813
Well, they're not very Christian any more so don't expect that to continue at Chick-fil-a

[Anonymous No.13344829]

>>13344818
>You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

>catholics
>christian
Choose one.

[Anonymous No.13344834]

>catholics
>not idolaters

[Anonymous No.13344836]

>>13344829
Cope harder, heretic.

[Anonymous No.13344880]

>>13344836
imagine having a money cult religion that doesn't allow wifes but is cool with this
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/vatileaks-scandal-vatican-properties-used-as-brothels-and-massage-parlours-where-priests-pay-for-sex-a6729251.html

[Anonymous No.13344881]

>>13344834
Catholics wrote ur bibel though.

[Anonymous No.13344884]

D&C thread by the noses

[Anonymous No.13344887]

>>13344881
imagine thinking Catholicism is christian orthodoxy and not some side hustle to make money off of people who could not speak latin

[Anonymous No.13344896]

>>13344887
Imagine listening to the big nose tribe.

[Anonymous No.13344898]

>cakefag makes another thread where he falseflags to "own the homophobes"
Get help.

[Anonymous No.13344902]

>>13344813
Most fast food chicken sandwiches are trash (yes even and especially the McChicken) but Popeyes' actually holds a candle to Chick-Fil-A, which surprised me.

[Anonymous No.13344904]

>>13344881
Jews wrote the bible, retard

[Anonymous No.13344907]

>>13344902
>Popeyes
It's disgusting m8.
The sides are shit, and the chicken tastes like a salt bomb.

[Anonymous No.13344913]

>>13344904
Jews wrote the part about ferskins, and stuff, but the Catholics scrappedbooked it.

[Anonymous No.13344915]

>>13344829
Catholics don't worship statues, they honor who the statue represents.

Where does Chik-fil-a openly admit to being a Christian company?

[Anonymous No.13344920]

>>13344896
i meant its all bull shit anyhow
Canaanites aka the founders of The Druze and Judaism which branched off into Islam and Christianity and their sub genres
weren't even monotheistic

[Anonymous No.13344922]

>>13344813
I've never had chick fil a and fuck waffle fries.

[Anonymous No.13344927]

>>13344913
Catholics arent the founders of Christianity retard they're one of the side cults
they weren't even a good cult they just knew how to scare the shit out of people and take their money

look up early Christianity there where a ton of christian cults back in the day

[Anonymous No.13344930]

>>13344813
>CFA
>donating to abortion groups
>donating to SPLC
>endorse Christian beliefs
someone's been living under a rock for the past month it seems ;)

[Anonymous No.13344935]

>>13344907
It is on the saltier side, but I actually prefer that. I wasn't talking about anything else at Popeye's.

[Anonymous No.13345120]

>>13344927
Catholics put together the Bible fuckhead.

[Anonymous No.13345139]

bi they bastardized it
The Hebrew Bible overlaps with the Greek Septuagint and the Christian Old Testament. The Christian New Testament is a collection of writings by early Christians, believed to be mostly Jewish disciples of Christ, written in first-century Koine Greek.

[Anonymous No.13345145]

>>13345120
The Hebrew Bible overlaps with the Greek Septuagint and the Christian Old Testament. The Christian New Testament is a collection of writings by early Christians, believed to be mostly Jewish disciples of Christ, written in first-century Koine Greek.

[Anonymous No.13345159]

>>13345120
imagine being this brainwashed and wrong
the catholic bible wasnt even a thing untill 1582
you worshiper of pedophilia and gold

[Anonymous No.13345174]

>>13345145
>>13345159
Imagine being against the truth this much.

[Anonymous No.13345180]

>>13345174
these are facts like are you trolling right now or are you one of those christian stereotypes that believes what ever theyre told and doesnt even know their own religion
like do you even know what year catholicism was formed or what it even is since for some reason you think Jesus started it

like Catholicism is basically just old school Scientology

[Anonymous No.13345186]

>>13344930
Blacks do way more abortions than whites, therefore abortion is good.

[Anonymous No.13345191]

>>13345186
this

[Anonymous No.13345194]

>>13345180
>these are facts
No they aren't. Well not "historically" accurate facts at least.
Catholicism was historically the first official Christian church, and they put together your modern Bible.

[Anonymous No.13345199]

>>13345194
state your source cause that is the dumbest thing ive ever heard

[Anonymous No.13345220]

>>13344813
yup. Jesus hooked it up with the first fast food restaurant. All he had was five loaves and two fishes and he made enough sandwiches to feed 5000. Jesus was way cool. Suck it Subway!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVJ-Wlacc-E

[Anonymous No.13345224]

>>13345194
The New Testament will reveal that the Catholic Church does not have its origin in the teachings of Jesus or His apostles. In the New Testament, there is no mention of the papacy, worship/adoration of Mary (or the immaculate conception of Mary, the perpetual virginity of Mary, the assumption of Mary, or Mary as co-redemptrix and mediatrix), petitioning saints in heaven for their prayers, apostolic succession, the ordinances of the church functioning as sacraments, infant baptism, confession of sin to a priest, purgatory, indulgences, or the equal authority of church tradition and Scripture. So, if the origin of the Catholic Church is not in the teachings of Jesus and His apostles, as recorded in the New Testament, what is the true origin of the Catholic Church?

[Anonymous No.13345227]

For the first 280 years of Christian history, Christianity was banned by the Roman Empire, and Christians were terribly persecuted. This changed after the “conversion” of the Roman Emperor Constantine. Constantine provided religious toleration with the Edict of Milan in AD 313, effectively lifting the ban on Christianity. Later, in AD 325, Constantine called the Council of Nicea in an attempt to unify Christianity. Constantine envisioned Christianity as a religion that could unite the Roman Empire, which at that time was beginning to fragment and divide. While this may have seemed to be a positive development for the Christian church, the results were anything but positive. Just as Constantine refused to fully embrace the Christian faith but continued many of his pagan beliefs and practices, so the Christian church that Constantine and his successors promoted progressively became a mixture of true Christianity and Roman paganism.

[Anonymous No.13345230]

>>13345199
History you dumb faggot. Before the Bible all the big noses had to carry around separate scriptures.
Now state your sources, and reasoning behind your absurd statements.
>inb4 Catholic Church wasn't olive during jeebus
I never claimed that they wrote it.

[Anonymous No.13345233]

Most Roman Catholic beliefs and practices regarding Mary are completely absent from the Bible. Where did those beliefs come from? The Roman Catholic view of Mary has far more in common with the Isis mother-goddess religion of Egypt than it does with anything taught in the New Testament. Interestingly, the first hints of Catholic Mariology occur in the writings of Origen, who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, which happened to be the focal point of Isis worship.

The Lord’s Supper being a consumption of the literal body and blood of Jesus is not taught in the Bible. The idea that bread and wine are miraculously transformed into the literal body and blood of Jesus (transubstantiation) is not biblical. However, several ancient pagan religions, including Mithraism, which was very popular in the Roman Empire, had some form of “theophagy” (the eating of one’s god) as a ritualistic practice.

[Anonymous No.13345236]

>>13345224
>>13345227
So this is what stupidity looks like.

[Anonymous No.13345237]

Roman Catholicism has “saints” one can pray to in order to gain a particular blessing. For example, Saint Gianna Beretta Molla is the patron saint of fertility. Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of animals. There are multiple patron saints of healing and comfort. Nowhere is even a hint of this taught in Scripture. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these and many other categories. Many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, and the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for cities as well.

[Anonymous No.13345241]

The idea that the Roman bishop is the vicar of Christ, the supreme leader of the Christian Church, is utterly foreign to the Word of God. The supremacy of the Roman bishop (the papacy) was created with the support of the Roman emperors. While most other bishops (and Christians) resisted the idea of the Roman bishop being supreme, the Roman bishop eventually rose to supremacy, again, due to the power and influence of the Roman emperors. After the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed, the popes took on the title that had previously belonged to the Roman emperors—Pontifex Maximus.

[Anonymous No.13345242]

Itt: Muslims argue about the Bible.

[Anonymous No.13345246]

Many more examples could be given. These four should suffice in demonstrating the origin of the Catholic Church. Of course, the Roman Catholic Church denies the pagan origin of its beliefs and practices. The Catholic Church disguises its pagan beliefs under layers of complicated theology and church tradition. Recognizing that many of its beliefs and practices are utterly foreign to Scripture, the Catholic Church is forced to deny the authority and sufficiency of Scripture.

[Anonymous No.13345250]

now go pay your local priest his shekels and tell him your secrets and say your magic words so you dont go to hell like a good goy

[Anonymous No.13345255]

>>13345237
>>13345241
>>13345246
Ok, but who put together the Bible that you're extrapolating your "facts" from?

[Anonymous No.13345264]

>>13345255
The New Testament has 27 books, written between about 50 and 100 AD, and falling naturally into two sections: the Gospels, which tell the story of Jesus (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John); and the Letters (or epistles) - written by various Christian leaders to provide guidance for the earliest church communities.

[Anonymous No.13345267]

The Catholic New Testament was published in 1582, the Old Testament in two volumes, one in 1609, the other in 1610. Released in parts between 1913–1935 with copious study and textual notes.

[Anonymous No.13345268]

>>13345264
>written by various Christian leaders to provide guidance for the earliest church communities.
Who put all of these into one book?
I don't mind if you keep dodging the question.

[Anonymous No.13345271]

>>13345250
based autistic high school atheist poster

[Anonymous No.13345274]

>>13345268
what does putting them in one book have to do with anything
its like saying who put together and edited the complete harry potter series into one book

[Anonymous No.13345280]

All modern Christians can trace their Bible to Catholic sources, because the Catholics provided it to them.

[Anonymous No.13345281]

protip it wasnt J.K. Rowling

[Anonymous No.13345291]

>>13345280
read >>13345274

[Anonymous No.13345293]

and what i posted earlier shows how catholics dont even fallow the teaching of the book they put together

[Anonymous No.13345298]

>>13345274
>what does putting them in one book have to do with anything
>Backpedaling
>then a false equivalence

[Anonymous No.13345300]

>>13345291
Read
>>13345298
But I guess it's not relevant since your religion doesn't rely on the singular Bible right?

[Anonymous No.13345301]

>>13345268
The canon was established over several centuries, with various councils of the bishops of the Church assembled to discuss which texts could be considered canonical and which texts were not. Many texts, like the Gnostic Gospels, were rejected as being heretical and inconsistent with the rest of the established canon and the Faith as traditionally practiced by the Church. Other texts, like the Didache or the Shepherd of Hermas, were deemed to be good to be read by the faithful, but were not considered to be inspired Scripture.

Over the centuries, the whole Church came to agree upon one unified canon for the New Testament, but there was great regional disagreement about whether certain texts of the Old Testament could be considered canonical. These differences were never fully resolved, and there are a great multitude of different Old Testament canons among varying groups.

[Anonymous No.13345304]

>>13345298
no it has nothing to do with anything you put together all the stories into one book that doesn't mean you wrote the stories you just edited them and wrote them in a language no one knew how to speak because its easier to manipulate people that way

[Anonymous No.13345308]

>>13345293
Your interpretation of the Catholic Bible does not make your previous claim correct though.

[Anonymous No.13345307]

>>13345300
Orthodox Christians dont
and im agnostic i just love religouse lore and i know how retarded Catholicism is

[Anonymous No.13345314]

>>13345307
Orthodox Christians were part of the Catholic Church.

[Anonymous No.13345317]

>>13345308
did you even read what i posted cause it sounds like you didnt

[Anonymous No.13345318]

But Chick-Fil-A's food is bland.

[Anonymous No.13345320]

>>13345301
>These differences were never fully resolved, and there are a great multitude of different Old Testament canons among varying groups.
Just Muslims vs The Jews, and Catholics(and their offshoots).

[Anonymous No.13345321]

>>13345317
I did. Did you read what I posted before posting your post?

[Anonymous No.13345328]

>>13345321
the origins of the catholic bible yes i never denied that
you keep playing this game of im right cause my people put together the catholic bible and youre wrong cause my people put together the catholic bible also jesus was catholic cause in 1583 my people put together the catholic bible

you know who also put together a bible the Mormons that doesn't make them any less wrong in their beliefs

[Anonymous No.13345329]

>>13345304
>no it has nothing to do with anything
It has everything to do with my original claim
>>13344913
>Jews wrote the part about ferskins, and stuff, but the Catholics scrappedbooked it.
So eat foreskin brainlet.

[Anonymous No.13345331]

>>13345314
The modern communions known as the "Orthodox Church" and the "Catholic Church" both make exclusive claims to be the sole, True Church - that is, the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic and Orthodox Church. Both claim these titles solely for themselves, and assert that the other body schismed away from this One Church. The "Oriental Orthodox" communion likewise makes such a claim.

Before the Schism, the biblical canon was regional, and the bishops of each region had a large say in determining what books were canon and what weren't. Which is why the Roman Church, the Eastern Orthodox churches, the Ethiopian orientals, the Armenian orientals, etc. all have slightly different canons today. There was never one single unified canon even before the schisms.

[Anonymous No.13345346]

>>13345328
No the Catholics did, and your "people" didn't exist as "christiabs" until after they branched off of the Catholic Church.
Or at the very least your branch of Christianity existed after gaining material that was provided to you by the Catholic Church.

[Anonymous No.13345349]

>>13345329
"Catholics arent the founders of Christianity retard they're one of the side cults
they weren't even a good cult they just knew how to scare the shit out of people and take their money

look up early Christianity there where a ton of christian cults back in the day"

was my original claim to which you dais nuh uh in 1583 catholics put together the modern catholic bible which means we totally made the religion

[Anonymous No.13345354]

>>13345331
>The modern communions known as the "Orthodox Church" and the "Catholic Church" both make exclusive claims to be the sole, True Church - that is, the One, Holy, Catholic, Apostolic and Orthodox Church.
Neither Church claims that they weren't once units fucko, so they both spawned from the Catholic Church.

[Anonymous No.13345358]

>>13345346
bitch im agnostic im talking about Christianity as a whole you know the thing that jesus a jewish druze made

[Anonymous No.13345361]

>>13345349
>"Catholics arent the founders of Christianity retard they're one of the side cults
Reread my claim numbnuts. Stop trying to force me into whatever imaginary battle that your having that's outside of my claim.

[Anonymous No.13345363]

>>13344834
all chirstcucks worship the jew so who cares?

[Anonymous No.13345366]

>>13345354
To say it like that implies that the "original" "Catholic Church" is no longer around, which no party claims.

[Anonymous No.13345371]

>>13345358
Bitch you're a dumb faggot, and the druze are Islamic (also out of the scope of the topic, you dimbfuck).

[Anonymous No.13345372]

>>13345361
>Catholics put together the Bible fuckhead.
was your reply

you must have a really low iq you cant even remember how our argument started

[Anonymous No.13345375]

>>13345366
No. You're just stupid, and your b

[Anonymous No.13345385]

>>13345372
But the Catholics did put your special Christian book together, and that wasn't my first post. You dumb cum eating fuck.

[Anonymous No.13345396]

>>13345363
We, as Christians, assert that the Jews who did not follow Christ are no longer truly Jews at all. That is to say, while they remain ethnically Hebrews, they have abandoned their own faith, and everything of value that is in Judaism has left them. The modern religion known as Judaism (which should perhaps more appropriately be called "Rabbinical Talmudism") bears no connection to the Faith of Abraham. They have lost their connection to the One God. Like Esau, they have given up their birthright, even though they foolishly still try to cling to it.

The Church asserts that it is truly Israel, and that if anyone are truly Jews, it is Christians. The ethnic Jews of today have no connection whatsoever with the Church.

[Anonymous No.13345397]

>>13345385
I AM AGNOSTIC GET THIS IN YOUR SKULL
they put together there own special book out of christian text not catholic text but CHRISTIAN
fuck me how dumb are you jesus

as i stated earlier
>i mean its all bull shit anyhow
Canaanites aka the founders of Judaism which branched off into Islam and Christianity and their sub genres
weren't even monotheistic

[Anonymous No.13345407]

this wasnt a catholic vs protestant argument
this was a person who actually studies religion vs a seething catholic argument

[Anonymous No.13345408]

>>13345397
>I AM AGNOSTIC
And your claims are wrong, and backed by nothing but sheer retardation.
>they put together there own special book out of christian text not catholic text but CHRISTIAN
So you finally admit that the Catholics put it all together.
>Canaanites aka the founders of Judaism which branched off into Islam and Christianity and their sub genres
weren't even monotheistic
Off topic, and you're retarded for not being able to stay on topic.

[Anonymous No.13345412]

[Anonymous No.13345414]

>>13345408
the topic was your religion is dumb

[Anonymous No.13345416]

>>13345407
>this was a person who actually studies religion vs a seething catholic argument
Wrong. It was about who pieced together the Christian Bible.

[Anonymous No.13345419]

>>13345408
like did you not reply to my statement stating that your religion is a dumb side cult of Christianity

[Anonymous No.13345420]

>>13345375
It just seems to me that there is a great confusion of terminology about who/what is actually being referred to when the word "Catholic" is used in this thread.

[Anonymous No.13345422]

>>13345414
See
>>13345416
You're stupid, and attempted to stray off course when you realized that you fucked up by being completely wrong.

[Anonymous No.13345423]

>>13345416
no its wast because that wasnt my original statement that was your argument to my original statement

[Anonymous No.13345429]

>>13345419
My only concern was to disprove all of the dumb faggots who were against
>>13344913
>Jews wrote the part about ferskins, and stuff, but the Catholics scrappedbooked it.
>>13345420
It seems to me that you are trying really hard to turn the argument into something else, because you were proven wrong.

[Anonymous No.13345437]

>>13345429
anon you need to reread the thread
i dont think you could have made more of an ass of yourself

[Anonymous No.13345440]

>>13345437
Go on explain why you think that.

[Anonymous No.13345454]

>>13345440
well instead of have any sort of resonable statement all your post are
just random aggressive statements that make you look like a fool
since theyre either false or irrelevant

[Anonymous No.13345458]

>>13345429
Proven wrong about what? FYI I am a third person who jumped into this conversation.

The point I'm trying to get across is that thus far the conversation has been very reductive about what "assembling the Bible" means and about what "the Catholic Church" is. The idea that there is some dialectic between being calling "Christian" and "Catholic" is a very modern invention of Protestants. All of the early Christian groups, the orthodox and heretic alike, considered themselves to be within "The Catholic Church." The idea of "denominations" is only a few centuries old, and projecting that back onto the early Church is simply incorrect.

[Anonymous No.13345465]

>>13345454
>since theyre either false or irrelevant
My statements aren't false. You just believe that they are, because they go against your religious beliefs, but historical evidence actually backs all my claims.

[Anonymous No.13345468]

>>13345465
i dont have religious beliefs this isnt dogma on my end its history

[Anonymous No.13345473]

>>13345465
sounds like youre projecting
>>13345458
the catholic church was founded in the roman empire almost 300 years of jesuses death

[Anonymous No.13345477]

>>13345473
after jesus's death*

[Anonymous No.13345485]

>>13345473
>the catholic church was founded in the roman empire almost 300 years of jesuses death
What is your point?

[Anonymous No.13345496]

>>13345473
And this is exactly what I mean by confusion over the term "Catholic". The first use of the term "catholic" to refer to the Church dates to ~100 AD, in a writing of the Apostolic father St. Ignatius of Antioch. The term has consistently been used to describe the Church since then. It isn't a name, so much as it is a descriptor - it means that wholeness is to be found within that which is catholic. In saying the term "catholic church", Ignatius was referring to the wholeness of the breadth of the body of the Church. And that is what the term still means today. To refer to "catholic church" is to make a contrast, too, to a singular "church", that is, one single church congregation which is a part of that whole Catholic Church.

I am curious what you think occured in the 300s that had not already been established long prior. Surely you don't believe that all the bishops assembled at Nicea simply popped out of thin air?

[Anonymous No.13345497]

>>13345485
meaning the original Christians weren't branded as catholic

see how you cant even fallow a conversation
this is why you come off as an ass

[Anonymous No.13345504]

>>13345468
>i dont have religious beliefs this isnt dogma on my end its history
>history
Then you're just misinformed
>>13345473
>the catholic church was founded in the roman empire almost 300 years of jesuses death
Biblical canon was agreed upon on, and established during the 5th century, dummy.

[Anonymous No.13345509]

>>13345496
im sure the roman empire found priest that would fallow their doctrine and convert people to their politics and culture

[Anonymous No.13345514]

>>13345509
You didn't respond to any point I made, and you're admitting you are uncertain of what you're talking about now. I recognize that I've been brief and unclear at points in my posts, but you're not even attempting to put forward a coherent position now.

[Anonymous No.13345516]

>>13345497
>see how you cant even fallow a conversation
>this is why you come off as an ass
All you said was
>the catholic church was founded in the roman empire almost 300 years of jesuses death
Which doesn't contradict my claim at all. It's not even relevant desu, because
>>13345504
>Biblical canon was agreed upon on, and established during the 5th century, dummy.

[Anonymous No.13345524]

>>13345514
you where right about the term catholic i had to look that up but youre wondering what happened and i explained what i believe happened and posted about it excessively earlier

[Anonymous No.13345528]

>>13345516
good talk dummy

[Anonymous No.13345529]

>>13345528
>good talk dummy
Explain your position, and why you believe that I'm the dumb one in this conversation.
Reminder:
I stayed on topic while you Reed all over the place.

[Anonymous No.13345533]

Sure do love all this food and cooking talk going on here.

[Anonymous No.13345537]

>>13345529
i like how you resort to trolling as a desperate attempt to save what little face you have

[Anonymous No.13345547]

/ck/ - Religion

[Anonymous No.13345550]

>>13345537
>trolling
Is that what you call being historically accurate, and relevant?
Maybe you should get your brain checked, because you might actually be suffering from a debilitating case of the stupids. You should do it before it becomes permanent.

[Anonymous No.13345698]

>>13344825
Suck this condom from my cock and taste your mother's arse you dirty little slum dog.