Why you're a fatty: Vol 1,235

[Anonymous No.11635036]

If the average person needs about 2000 calories a day, how many calories should you eat in a day?

If your goal is to lose weight and you determine you need to limit yourself to 1800 calories a day, how many calories should you eat in a day?


Trick questions? No, they're not, but the answers you give will demonstrate exactly why so many people have problems dropping all the fat they accumulate by eating and drinking garbage while sitting on their asses for far too long.

So, fatties, answer the questions, and then I'll enlighten you and help you drop some lard over time.

[Anonymous No.11635057]

This post is off-topic. This board is about eating and cooking, not weight loss. Maybe try posting it over on closetfag central (/fit/).

[Anonymous No.11635060]

There is no exact number of calories that everyone should eat. There are many variables. People who obsess over calories instead of lifestyle as a whole end up yo-yo-ing anyway.

[Anonymous No.11635063]

>>11635057
>This post is off-topic.
This post is right on topic because it's about developing a diet plan based on a variety of foods, you fat fuck.

[Anonymous No.11635073]

>>11635060
>There is no exact number of calories that everyone should eat.

That's close, anon, however there is certainly a caloric threshold for each individual that will either create surplus or shortage, and that's what we're going to discuss.

[Anonymous No.11635075]

>>11635063
>it's about developing a diet plan based on a variety of foods
>tries to jew his way around the fact that the central theme of the thread is weight loss
You're not old enough or smart enough to attempt this. Go back to your home board.

[Anonymous No.11635081]

>>11635073
but why did you reddit space?

[Anonymous No.11635089]

>>11635073
>we're going to talk about physiology and weight loss instead of cooking

[Anonymous No.11635095]

>>11635075
How about you fuck right off out of here if you don't want to participate, you cancerous faggot.

There's people out there that are clueless about how to eat healthy without starving or gaining weight, and this thread is for them.

Now fuck off.

[Anonymous No.11635104]

>>11635095
>participating in an off-topic thread
No thanks. I'm not cancer like you. Take it to the proper board, zoomer who doesn't think the rules apply to him because he never got spanked.

[Anonymous No.11635106]

>>11635081
>"reddit space"

That meme has always been dumb, anon, as only /redditcancer/ would be able to recognize "reddit space", so please go back.

[Anonymous No.11635109]

>>11635106
>secondhand knowledge doesn't exist
Reddit spacers confirmed for thoughtless.

[Anonymous No.11635167]

>>11635109
>cognitive dissonance kicks in
>doubles down on stupid

You've got to go back....

[Anonymous No.11635174]

>>11635167
>....
Ellipses come in groups of three, Mr. Learningdisabledteenager.

[Anonymous No.11635338]

>this assblasted fatty

[Anonymous No.11635410]

>>11635073
>>11635095
>>11635106
>>11635167
>>>/reddit/

[Anonymous No.11635676]

>>11635036
0. You eat 0 calories until you reach your goal weight, then eat the required amount of calories (BMR+exercise) for that weight, your height, and your age.

[Anonymous No.11635686]

I would think that a simple google search can tell you how many calories burned a particular exercise can do.

If you're trying to lose weight, simply adjust your eating habits to be less caloric intake to the calories you burn, right?

If you want that pizza, you better start walking in place or do some push ups.

[Anonymous No.11635698]

I do intermittent fasting, my eating window for the daily dose of max 1500 kcal is from 20 to 00. Male, 189 cm and about 2 months ago 63 kg.

[Anonymous No.11635705]

Just go keto if you want to lose weight.
It's 2018, everyone should know it's the best diet for weight loss by now.

[Anonymous No.11635769]

>>11635686
>adjust your eating habits to be less caloric intake to the calories you burn, right?

Yes, but the key to doing it is by ignoring caloric intake over a daily period in favor of a 10 day, or greater, plan. So rather than trying to limit yourself to "X" number of calories per day, which is a pain in the ass for most people, you limit yourself to "Y" number of calories over a 10 day period. That way you can mix and match the calorie density of your meals to keep it interesting.

[Anonymous No.11636524]

>>11635036
One meal a day. Stop snacking. Exercise. Green tea/black coffee. Stop drinking soda, alcohol or any caloric drink.

[Anonymous No.11636551]

Lol @ the fag sending reports and trying to police this thread. You realize you're being ignored and laughed at right?

[Anonymous No.11636590]

>>11636524
>One meal a day.

Can be an option. Using the long term planning method, this one meal can consist of 2 large pizza's on 1 day, followed by a day with solely a salad with some oil and vinegar.

Think for the long term, fatties. You can do it.

[Anonymous No.11637125]

>>11635036
Do you think boogie was happier back then?

[Anonymous No.11637162]

>>11635036
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Reporting u for fatiscm

[Anonymous No.11637245]

>>11637125
No way, all he ever did was complain. At least now he's closer to normal so he must be happier right?

[Anonymous No.11638116]

>>11635036
Fact: once somebody hits 300lb their metabolism is destroyed

[Anonymous No.11638135]

Fat Redditniggers seething at based weight loss OP.

[Anonymous No.11638191]

>>11635095
>accuses others of being cancerous while making offtopic threads and redditspacing in every post
Lol

[Anonymous No.11638256]

>>11638191
That's probably just to piss off easily-triggered fags.

[Anonymous No.11638272]

>>11638191
>Lol
not a word, why the fuck would you capitalize it like one

[Anonymous No.11638628]

>>11636590
Why are you convinced you've cracked the code of weight loss with this 'long term' idea? Limiting calories per day is simple and easy to stick with, allowing yourself to eat 2 large pizzas will just encourage shitty habits and gorging on those days you're stuck with a single salad.

[Anonymous No.11638747]

>>11635676
This is the correct answer.

[Anonymous No.11638751]

hahaha how is being fat real? hahaha like just close the fridge man, walk away ahahaha

[Anonymous No.11638837]

>>11638272
because he's a phoneposter

[Anonymous No.11638846]

>>11638272
Abbreviations are capitalized like normal words when they are first in a sentence, retard.

[Anonymous No.11638857]

>>11638837
Oh cry moar, I'll post from my Nintendo DS if I fucken want to

[Anonymous No.11638976]

>>11638628

The long term planning allows you to introduce calorie bombs much easier than daily planning, which means it's easier for the average person and more likely to be successful.

All I want is to make it easier for people to lose weight and get healthy, and long term planning accomplishes that goal.

[Anonymous No.11638992]

>>11638846
>tries to play the grammar card

[Anonymous No.11638995]

>>11638256
>That's probably just to piss off easily-triggered fags.
It worked, too.

[Anonymous No.11640477]

>>11638116
What happens here? Are they fucked for life once that happens?

It could be that the type of person to ever become 300+lbs has an addictive personality and was hopeless from the beginning.

[Anonymous No.11640486]

/ck/ needs these threads more than /fit/, maybe we can change the memeshithole of 4chan to a place that actually discusses cooking nutritious and delicious meals

[Anonymous No.11640503]

>>11635036
Average person who eats 2k calories a day, do not go to the gym and are fat as a result. Sedentary people of all sizes need less than that.

[Anonymous No.11640579]

My current problem is primarily related to proportions. I don't have a kitchen scale or any measuring cups, and am a poor judge of portions and sizes. I currently use cronometer, and am unsure of the accuracy of my entries, so I'm obviously underscoring myself. My daily allotment is 1650 calories, about a 19% deficit.

I'm 6'2", 205 pounds, and 25% body fat, aiming to eat 150 grams of protein per day, the same way /fit/'s sticky recommends eating grams of protein equal to your lean body mass in pounds. I have trouble meeting my macros and I have trouble correctly proportioning food. Any advice?

[Anonymous No.11640612]

>>11640477
Nah, it's almost never too late, but 300 + is recoverable. Know a dude in school who was 330 ish and dropped enough weight to join the military and actually make it through jump school.

Just takes motivation and information.

[Anonymous No.11640620]

>>11640579
>Any advice?
Buy a scale, dumb ass, they're like 10 bucks in any large supermarket these days.

[Anonymous No.11640660]

>>11635698
Fuck off Skeletor

[Anonymous No.11640683]

>>11640620
I plan to. But beyond that is there anything else to know? I'm also really bad about counting things exactly. If I cook something in a pan, like eggs, and I have to butter the pan, how much of the butter do I count? I know I'm not ingesting all of it, since there's clearly still butter or oil used it grease the pan in the pan after cooking, but how much do I record for my kcal count?

Additionally, I'm having trouble understanding /fit/'s sticky regarding fat loss versus weight loss and building muscle mass.

[Millenial basedboy No.11640711]

who here r/fatpeoplehate refugee?? :D

[Anonymous No.11640746]

>>11640683
Easy way to do it is divide your plate into 5 parts, cover 3 parts with veggie's, 1 part with protein, 1 part with starch / grain.

[Anonymous No.11640807]

>>11640660
Why should I?

[Anonymous No.11640819]

>>11635060
good, yo-yo dieting is one of the best ways of losing weight.

[Anonymous No.11640836]

>>11640746
Cool. Any advice about counting the calories of oil/butter used to grease pans though?

Also the thing I don't understand on the /fit/ sticky. The sticky advocates doing strength based resistance training even if you're trying to lose weight doing a calorie deficit. But I was under the impression that doing so would make me weaker and that you couldn't build muscle mass while simultaneously losing weight/burning fat. Am I wrong?

[Anonymous No.11640888]

fuck fatties

[Anonymous No.11641074]

>>11640836
>counting the calories of oil/butter
Read the label and measure, dumb ass.

Strength based training is fine as it will indeed build muscle and help burn fat, however, if you're lifting, you need to use body consistency as the standard and not just weight.

[Anonymous No.11641092]

>>11641074
So I just need to use a scale that can appraise body fat percentage to understand my weight lifting progress.

ANd my point about oil and butter is that I know not all the oil and butter I use when greasing a pan is ingested, plenty stays in the pan when I'm done cooking and is washed off at the end, I'm just asking about a rule of thumb. Like if I use X amount of butter to grease a pan to fry 2 eggs, and then the pan is still slick with plenty of butter at the end, what portion of X do I record?

[Anonymous No.11641246]

>>11641092
>what portion of X do I record?
The full measure.

If you're a fatty anon just trying to get healthy, don't worry about being 100% accurate with any of your diet calculations. Shoot for about an 80-90% solution and you'll be fine. It's not like you're trying to be a fucking pro-athlete or model or some shit.

POSITIVE WAVES TO YOU FATTIES!!! GET HEALTHY!!!

[Anonymous No.11641253]

>>11641246
Okay so I should bake way more, I'm probably sabotaging otherwise healthy dishes cooking them on the stovetop.

[Anonymous No.11641424]

>>11638992
And wins
Btfo

[Anonymous No.11641433]

1800 calories a day is not enough
when i was at my hoghest 500 lbs i drastically cut my calorie intake to around 1200-1300 a day maximum

[Anonymous No.11641435]

>>11635057
how fucking fat do you have to be to get mad at someone posting information about dietary plans and weight loss?

[Anonymous No.11641723]

>If the average person needs about 2000 calories a day how many should you eat in a day
Well, ideally, 2000 if that's what you need. But if you do more, you need more to sustain a healthy weight.
>if your goal is to lose weight and (...) you limit to 1800 calories a day, how many should you eat in a day
1800, what the fuck. Less ideally as long as you're getting the necessary nutrients I guess.

I was around 350 at the start of 2018, and now I'm to 275. In truth it wasn't from my own willpower, I had a severe fit of OCD and anxiety over food allergies and I was afraid to eat fucking anything, so I started eating just about the only thing I liked to eat and was comfortable eating without puking up afterwards for fear it'd kill me or some equally stupid, illogical shit (rice). So I went from eating fast food and drinking soda to just not. And I haven't felt any inkling of a desire to go back to it. I mean I'm not turning down a slice of pizza, but I'm not eating an ENTIRE pizza by myself now, I'm eating one or two slices like a fucking normal person.

I need to actually work out, because I basically just cut my calorie intake from, honestly I think 6000+ (or maybe even more I didn't ever count), to around 2000, in all honesty I'm still eating 2500, maybe 3000 some days because my stomach is fucking huge and just a normal sized meal doesn't cut it, so I go back for thirds, or fourths. I wish I didn't but I don't have the willpower for it. I'm entirely aware but I just can't physically stop myself from eating more, because I'm so fucking hungry. I hate it so much.
But that's about it. I feel more comfortable now so I'm branching out some, but I get severe hives and throat-swelling if I eat fruits. Vegetables are alright though, so I'm working those in. Wish I could eat apples, but carrots are alright I guess.

[Anonymous No.11641762]

>set 1,800 goal
>follow that for 3 days
>start to get hungry and go back to eating 3000
How do I stop

[Anonymous No.11641825]

>>11641762
Intermittent fasting has no severe downsides and fringe health benefits (some studies show HGH production more than quintupling during IF but IF studies are limited in general) but its REAL advantage is that it prevents grazing and helps control food intake by preventing you from eating at all. Basically the more specific your rules the less likely you are to break them. Lapses are usually caused by ambiguities permitting you to give yourself an undeserved break.

[Anonymous No.11642097]

>>11635104
>hurr durr itth off-topic therefore itth okey for me to derail da thread
kys

[Anonymous No.11642132]

>>11641723
Just remember anon taking a dedicated 30m walk a day is a great way for you to start getting exercise in

[Anonymous No.11642207]

Lost around 100lbs and only lifestyle change was quitting sugar. There are waaaaay better drugs that're way less dangerous than sugar and probably cheaper aswell.

[Anonymous No.11642319]

>>11641723
>1800, what the fuck.
No, anon, that's wrong. It all depends on what you want to eat, and when you want to eat it, based on a long term plan of at least 10 days. Maybe you want to have a 2500 calorie day? No problem, just subtract the 700 calories somewhere else throughout the 10 day plan. The long term plan gives you greater options and allows you to gradually adjust to reduced calories over time.

[Anonymous No.11642329]

>>11641762
>How do I stop
Don't, just eat something less calorie dense more often.

The key to weight loss is conditioning your palate to enjoy flavors other than sweet / salt / fat. Think ginger, garlic, chili, cumin, cinnamon, alspice, and any number of other spices you can use to enhance the flavor of things like salads, veggies, yogurts and cheeses.

[Anonymous No.11642711]

>>11638976
I think it's more important to teach a fat person about portion control and serving sizes rather than continuing to support heavy eating habits and manipulating your diet plan to accommodate them. I think the more valuable long term planning they should be looking to is meal prep, it teaches them to limit portions and cook for themselves rather than maintaining this image of 2 large pizzas as 'good food' while healthy salads are the off day they feel forced to eat.

[Anonymous No.11642712]

>>11640477
I went from nearly 400 to 260 and still dropping. I went from heavy breathing too much for comfort to managing long walks and stairs better than thinner friends.

[Anonymous No.11642975]

>>11635036
ITT skinny dumbshits in circlejerk as if they had to add any insight to anything ever

You guys ever wondered why you're stupid? No? Why not? Why The Fuck Not?

[Anonymous No.11642983]

ideal weight is 151lbs according to various formulations
currently at 131lbs~
feels pretty good anons
feels sexy

[Anonymous No.11643074]

>>11640477
no, their metabolism isn't permanently fucked. what will permanently fuck your metabolism is going on a calorie restriction diet like OP is advocating.
Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after "The Biggest Loser" competition"
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136388
>After 6 years ... RMR was 704±427 kcal/day below baseline (P < 0.0001) and metabolic adaptation was -499±207 kcal/day (P < 0.0001).

those contestants were watched and monitored by doctors and dietiticians and trainers throughout the show to ensure they followed the conventional "eat less move more" CICO plan to the letter, and it left their metabolism utterly wrecked even 6 years later, to the point where they would gain weight at more than 1300kcal/day.

Fasting (including intermittent fasting) and fasting-mimicking diets like keto avoid this problem, since the metabolic adaptation to actual starvation ends as soon as you start eating again. with calorie restriction the adaption is permanent, and exercise doesn't help, nor do drugs (the Biggest Loser contestants were drugged to keep their metabolism up during the show).

OP can get bent.

[Anonymous No.11643160]

>>11635081
>implying

Why did you think a common spacing all across the world is exclusively used on internet meme site "reddit" ?

[Anonymous No.11643256]

>>11635036
>If the average person needs about 2000 calories a day, how many calories should you eat in a day?
The most groosly average calculation of that was 2350, but the FDA decided to round it down to a nice neat number. A muscular guy could easily need 3000-3500 with no activity.

Not that there's any reasonable or good way to actually figure that out at all.

[Anonymous No.11643350]

>>11643256
>could easily need 3000-3500 with no activity.
found the amerifat

[Anonymous No.11643378]

>>11643350
And I just found the retard who believes the "2000 calories" meme.

[Anonymous No.11643424]

You're fat because you eat carbs. Stop eating bread.

[Anonymous No.11643433]

>>11643378
The equilibrium is at BMR + calories burnt by activity. You need to be very active or a big guy to get 3000-3500 kcal in total, so 3500 BMR is for titans.

[Anonymous No.11643479]

>>11643433
I think you're missing the second part where calorie counting is meaningless anyways, since labels can be off by as much as 20% and new adjustments to a commercial recipe don't really need rectification.

And any fresh-made food can have wildly different amounts between two plates of the same meal.

[Anonymous No.11643887]

>>11642975
Don't be angry, fatty. Be healthy. Most of you poor bastards were simply conditioned to respond to the shitty food you eat today, so it's not all your fault.

Doing nothing about it is, though.

Take one step at a time and start with cutting out soft drinks. You can do it, anon.

[Anonymous No.11643932]

>>11643479
It doesn't matter how inaccurate labels are because you simply keep adjusting your target number down until you do lose weight to account for whatever errors or uncertainty may be present.
>Did you lose weight this week?
>If yes, good. Keep doing what you did.
>If no, eat less next week.
>Repeat.

[Anonymous No.11643938]

>>11643932
>adjusting your diet as needed to meet your goals
T-that's CRAZY talk!

[Anonymous No.11644623]

>>11643074
I do one meal a day, which would account for intermittent fasting, but I have to add caloric restriction on it since my stomach is so big I can get fat with just a single meal a day. Will this wreck my metabolism then?

[Anonymous No.11645773]

>>11644623
who knows. OMAD is the least fasty of the various IF schemes, so its the most susceptible to getting you into trouble.
standard diets with calorie restriction diets fucks your metabolism because it keeps your insulin:glucagon ratio high enough that the body has to run on dietary energy. fasting or fasting-mimicking diets like keto with calorie restriction work because they lower your insulin enough to allow the adopose cells to release their fat, and the resulting low insulin:glucagon ratio triggers the liver into producing ketones and the muscles into running off triglycerides, so the deficit in your caloric intake is made up with the adopose fat.
OMAD with a "balanced" reduced calorie meal will raise your insulin levels for several hours - how many hours varies wildly. whether your scheme will harm your metabolism depends on how fast your insulin levels drop and how long the energy from your meal remains in circulation, and how long your insulin levels remain low before your next meal. it can work for a lot of people, but it may not for a prediabetic. OMAD with a reduced-calorie low-carb/keto meal will work though since the low carb meal keeps your insulin low even if you eat 1500kcal.

[Anonymous No.11645991]

>>11645773
So what, to simultaneously lose weight, body fat percentage and increase muscle gains I need a calorie deficit and IF or keto, preferably both?

[Anonymous No.11646011]

>>11645991
You can't lose weight and gain muscle at the same time without "supplements"

[Anonymous No.11646018]

>>11646011
Can you tell me why /fit/'s sticky recommends strength based resistance training even if trying to lose weight? Not a snarky comment genuinely asking.

[Anonymous No.11646034]

>>11645991
You need a calorie deficit to lose weight. Period. Keto and fasting are both ways to do that without damaging your metabolism. To increase muscle then intermittent fasting is the way to go because fasting increases HGH production for rapid muscle gains. But if you go with shorter fasts then it helps to eat keto during your feeding window so your insulin stays low during most of the fasting window.

[Anonymous No.11646036]

>>11646011
If you're gaining muscle and losing body fat then weight is neither here nor there

[Anonymous No.11646040]

>>11646018
/fit/ has a hardon for strength resistance training. You may as well ask why a vegan board recommends a vegan diet for gaining muscle.

[Anonymous No.11646045]

>>11646034
So if I'm fasting there's no need for keto because the point of keto is to use a diet that mimics (some of) the benefits of fasting like ketosis which fasting also triggers?

Can I increase my strength despite losing weight via resistance training while doing a calorie deficit?

[Anonymous No.11646056]

>>11646011
Not sure why you think weight and muscle levels are coupled.
The Biggest Loser contestants lost weight and gained muscle at the same time. I lost 7 lbs last month while going from a 40 lb bow to a 67 lb bow without using supplements.

[Anonymous No.11646095]

>>11646045
If you're fasting you aren't eating any carbs - fasting is low carb by definition. During your feeding phase you arent fasting, so eating keto or not becomes relevant. This is an obvious point, but it really helps to think of IF as multiple separate diets that alternate, not as one diet with two phases. This makes it clearer that you can customize the feeding time to achieve whatever you want. I've been doing a 3 day fast, hard exercise, then a 2 day high protein diet to build muscle, then a 2 day calorie restricted keto diet, then repeat. I lost weight while gaining substantial muscle. You wont find my diet in any pre-canned IF scheme, but it was simple to design it to achieve all my goals.

[Anonymous No.11646101]

>>11646095
So ketosis is caused strictly by having low carbs, regardless of whether that's in relation to other macros or literally no food whatsoever, and keto diet achieves just ketosis while fasting is ketosis and other attributed like an HGH spike.

[Anonymous No.11646117]

>>11635036
I can't say I'm a fatty, but I'm definitely pretty overweight.
I don't know how many calories I eat in a day. I suppose it's somewhere around 3000 calories.

although I don't just sit on my ass all day. just in my free time. in my work I stand and walk all day and I walk/ride my bike to most of my destinations as well.

[Anonymous No.11646174]

>>11646101
Yep. Fasting and keto are related. Fasting does lots of things, it lowers insulin resistance, loses weight without metabolic damage, raises hgh and adrenalin (you actually feel hyper during a fast), and triggers autophagy where the body kills marginal cells and recycles them, cleans up telomere damage associated with alzheimers, and seems to weaken or kill many cancers. Keto primarily lowers insulin levels and the benefits are those that flow from this, including lowering insulin resistance and losing weight without metabolic damage. Both techniques are useful in their own right, fasting is harder to do and more extreme but does a lot more, keto is easier to pull off but more limited. The two work well together, keto makes fasting much easier since theres not as big of a shift between keto and fasting as there is from a standard diet to fasting, you dont get carb withdrawals for example.

[Anonymous No.11646238]

>>11646101
Lack of carbs causes your insulin to drop which is what triggers ketosis (technically it's the insulin:glucagon ratio, but insulin is what is controlled by diet). The keto diet is simply a way to induce ketosis and sustain it while eating a maintenance level of calories. The lack of caloric intake during a full-on fast is what triggers the rest of the metabolic changes that come with fasting. There's a continuum between keto and fasting as you reduce calories on a keto diet. There is no such continuum between a standard diet and fasting, which is where the risk of metabolic damage arises, theres a dangerous zone where your body isnt getting enough calories to survive at its metabolic level but is getting too many calories to make the changes that allow you to survive during fasting.

[Anonymous No.11647237]

I lost a ton of weight by skipping breakfast, and eating a single largeish meal in 2 parts, once at 11am and again at 5pm.

You quickly get used to eating less.
I don't suggest starving yourself more than this, it affects your cognitive abilities, at least for me, it did.

[Anonymous No.11647372]

>>11642319
This is overly complicated and unnecessary for 90% of people who just want to lose some weight. Also what a stupid and imprecise plan of action you're suggesting.

>hurr just subtract 700 somewhere else if you want to eat a lot one day

First off that's really vague and unhelpful. Secondly, you're encouraging cheat days instead of the rare cheat meal which is a bad habit and leads back to shitty eating. Keep it simple, dipshit. Fatty wants 2500 calories of beer and pizza for dinner? Coffee for breakfast and celery for lunch.

Nobody listen to this retard.

[Anonymous No.11647401]

>>11643074
>contestants work their ass off exercising and dieting
>lose fat and gain muscle
>rmr drops
>contestants stopped exercising and dieting
>lost muscle and gained fat
>rmr drops a little more

stop making people worried and nervous. CICO works.

[Anonymous No.11647406]

>>11643479
hey dumbfuck, everyone knows this and it's accounted for

[Anonymous No.11647414]

>>11646018
Because weight lifting burns fat and grows muscle, so you'll look better at the same weight. Yes you can gain muscle on calorie restriction, especially if you are newbie lifter.

@11645991 doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.

[Anonymous No.11648629]

>>11647372
>really vague and unhelpful. Secondly, you're encouraging cheat days
It's neithe vague or unhelpful to anyone with a brain more advanced than that of a toddler, fatty.

[Anonymous No.11648676]

I believe I am underweight due to my diet and genetics. I seem to eat as much (if not more) than my brother but can't seem to reach his weight. Is there anything that can help slow down my metabolism or give me fast fats and calories (aside from nuts)?

[Anonymous No.11648702]

>>11648676
You're under 25 still, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.11648706]

>>11635057
Based retard

[Anonymous No.11648714]

>>11648702
Yes, I'm 23.

[Anonymous No.11648733]

>>11648714
Yea, thought so. About the only thing you can do is make sure you're eating all should be unless you want to try to go a bulking route, which is a pain in the ass.

At 25 your metabolism will start to slowly wind down and it'll be easier to pick up and maintain muscle.....but fat, too. At 30 is when shit starts to slow down for real, and it gets worse every year after that.

[Anonymous No.11648755]

>>11648629
It's a retarded system. Want a big dinner? Skip breakfast and lunch. Simple. No need for some brainlet's 10 day autism.

[Anonymous No.11648773]

>>11648755
>spergs out about "cheat days"
>advocates "cheat days"

[Anonymous No.11648799]

>>11648733
That does make sense, my dad was exactly like me at my age but he seems to have put on noticeable weight now. I guess life does get easier :^)

[Anonymous No.11648871]

>>11648773
Daily adjustment would be more focused, i.e. cheat meal vs cheat day. key difference.

you're honestly dumb for not getting this

[Anonymous No.11649057]

>>11638837
Literally nothing wrong with posting from my phone while on the toilet.

[Anonymous No.11649307]

>>11635036
I used to be fat but now I'm not, I lift weights and eat about as much as I used to if not more (except I make sure to eat healthy) and I have become strong instead of fat. Feels good my friends.

[Anonymous No.11649366]

>>11647401
>he didnt read the paper
Thats not what happened, chucklefuck.
the contestants that dropped off the diet sooner had a higher RMR 6 years later when the study was done. It was much lower than normal for a person of their weight/age/gender, but higher than the contestants that stayed on the diet longer. the longer the contestants stayed on the CICO eat less/move more diet the greater the metabolic damage they suffered. The greatest metabolic damage was to the one contestant that had successfully kept her weight off 6 years later. unfortunately for her the trend is inexorable, the greater her willpower and determination, the worse the metabolic damage. there is no winning with the CICO diet.

[Anonymous No.11649407]

>>11635036
I eat less than 2000 calories a day and I've replaced soda with water, carbonated and sparking water, and coffee
I've lost 10 lbs but I'm stagnating around the 240lbs mark (I'm 6 ft. 2 inches so I'm at a weight that's actually not unhealthy) but I still want to lose more. I can't work out because I had surgery recently so I want to make a dietary change once again

I eat one meal a day, and only one, but it's usually around 1800 calories by itself
Is that the problem?

[Anonymous No.11649420]

>>11649407
240lbs is still obese at 6'2" according to BMI, and if you're making a concerted effort to lose weight I doubt you have a low enough body fat percentage or high enough muscle mass that you're an exception to BMI.

[Anonymous No.11649424]

>>11642097
Uh, yeah. That's exactly what that means, tard.

[Anonymous No.11649434]

>>11648706
>closet fag who can't follow the rules

[Anonymous No.11649453]

>>11643160
>all across the world
In middle school maybe. Doing that shit as an adult means you're learning disabled and can't read regular formatting. They do it on reddit in order to make their post as large as possible to get noticed and get goodboy points. You can go back now. This is my site, not yours.

[Anonymous No.11649483]

>>11635036
I know that many fat people that have always been fat - I blame mainly their parents for this, as they are often fat themselves and offer terrible food to their kids, refuse to lose because they'll end up disgusting, anyway.
Excess skin is ugly, still, I think it's best for their health. Unfortunately, most of them have grow up depressed and mentally ill.

Tl;dr. Don't let your kids get fat.

[Anonymous No.11649491]

>>11649366
That is exactly what happened. They had a rapid change in their lean body mass. You're full of shit and spreading lies. Stop.

CICO works for everyone

[Anonymous No.11649509]

>>11649407
>Is that the problem?

Every body is different, anon. If you hit a plateau, it's time to change things up to regain momentum, so try going to 2-3 meals a day and see if that helps speed up your metabolism. Positive waves, dude.

[Anonymous No.11649517]

>>11649483
>Don't let your kids get fat.
It makes me so g'damn angry seeing hambeasts corrupt and ruin innocent kids.

[Anonymous No.11649557]

>>11649517
And they tend to put into their children's heads that is all genetics, so it won't help to try to lose weight.

[Anonymous No.11649614]

>>11649557
And of course those poor fat bastards are bombarded with advertising that makes it seem normal and "cool" to eat pure sugar/salt/fat garbage no matter where they turn.

If there were as many heroin commercials normalizing that shit as there are soft drink and fast food commercials, than half the nation would be dependent on smack.

Can't keep the kikes from making their money on sugar futures and fast food, though, can we?