/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.11587841]

What are your favorite keto meals /ck/?

[Anonymous No.11587843]

>>11587841
What's the mashed stuff? Looks like potato, but I presume not.

[Anonymous No.11587846]

>>11587843
Cauliflower

[Anonymous No.11587847]

>>11587843
likely cauliflower which, when eaten in excess amounts, isn't keto
no one should follow keto

[Anonymous No.11587851]

>>11587847
And why is that?

[Anonymous No.11587858]

>>11587847
Just don't eat in excess dummie

[Anonymous No.11587873]

>>11587847
>>11587858
You have to define excess

[Anonymous No.11587882]

>>11587858
OPs image is over the excess of consumable cauliflower so that
its not keto
>>11587851
tell me why you should switch to keto and then Ill entertain your request

[Anonymous No.11587883]

>>11587873
when tummy full

[Anonymous No.11587894]

>>11587882
There is not more than 40g of carbs in that serving.

[Anonymous No.11587904]

>>11587882
Carbs and refined sugar make you fat, raise your insulin tolerance, clog your arteries, and fuck with your overall mental health. Keto diet has very few carbs.

[Anonymous No.11587906]

>>11587882
Keto taste yummy.

[Anonymous No.11587930]

I'm a fat fuck. I don't know much about diets do you guys recommend this to weight loss?

[Anonymous No.11587934]

>>11587930
My Dr. Did.

[Anonymous No.11587936]

>>11587930
Yes.

I reccomend watching "The Magic Pill" "Fathead" and anything by Dr. Jason Fung.

[Anonymous No.11587940]

>>11587882
Because you can get drunk on a very small amount of alcohol, which saves a lot of money.

[Anonymous No.11587941]

>>11587904
>Other potential risks include kidney stones, several vitamin and mineral deficiencies, decreased bone mineral density, and gastrointestinal distress. (7) And while some fats can be healthy, there’s a risk that in following a high-fat diet, you’ll increase your intake of unhealthy trans and saturated fats. These “bad” fats are found in things like red meat, poultry skin, cheese, and butter and can lead to an increased risk of bad cholesterol and heart disease. (8)
Fuck that does sound good!

>>11587930
It will definitely help you lose weight.

Keto is great for short term weight loss—long term it simply isnt good for your colon or heart.

[Anonymous No.11587947]

>>11587941
>if you eat too much bad fats on any diet it’s bad for you
>this somehow means keto is bad especially for this reason
You’re fucking dumb

[Anonymous No.11587959]

>>11587941
Saturated fats are bad dummie. Trans fats are horrible, but only found in highly processed foods and vegetable oils.

[Anonymous No.11587962]

>>11587947
Kek keto is literally a diet based on eating fat. Hence, the increased risk of consuming ‘bad fats’ and meat in general.

[Anonymous No.11587963]

>>11587959
Aren't*

>I'm the dummie now

[Anonymous No.11587967]

>>11587962
Bad fats are only in processed food, keto recommends non processed food. Hmmmmmm.

[Anonymous No.11587974]

>>11587962
High carb foods can have large amounts of trans fats. Most high fat foods have zero trans fat.

[Anonymous No.11587982]

>Our advice is no more than 36 eggs, per day
Lmao who the fuck is asking to eat more eggs than this

[Anonymous No.11587984]

I just want yummie keto recipes.

[Anonymous No.11587994]

>Every time someone tries to convince me to go on keto
>"But you can eat as much bacon as you want!"
Yeah I'm really convinced it's not a meme diet.

[Anonymous No.11587998]

I’m a healthy-weight vegetarian, but the energy aspect of keto appeals to me. Is it even conceivable to do keto without meat?

[Anonymous No.11587999]

>>11587994
That's dirty keto. Processed food isn't recommended.

[Anonymous No.11588003]

>>11587998
Not really, you need about 15-20% protien, and anything that's high in protien and not meat, will likely be high in carbs as well.

[Anonymous No.11588006]

>>11588003
That’s what I figured. Well, good luck out there boys. I’ll watch your progress from the sidelines

[Anonymous No.11588010]

>>11587998
You do realize that the plants you are eating live off of decomposing meat, right?

[Anonymous No.11588015]

>>11588006
Whatever you do, dont fucking consume vegetable oils.

[Anonymous No.11588022]

>>11588015
I cook with mostly olive or sesame oil, so hopefully they’re alright.
>>11588010
I honestly wasn’t aware that plants live off decomposing meat, that’s really interesting

[Anonymous No.11588033]

>>11588022
Olive is great, throw the sesame away NOW!

[Anonymous No.11588034]

>>11587998
The hard part would be getting enough protein without carbohydrates. It can work if you like tofu a lot. If you eat eggs and fish, it's really easy.

[Anonymous No.11588048]

>>11588034

[Anonymous No.11588054]

>>11588033
Huh? I’ve always read that sesame, like olive, is a healthy oil. Further, I don’t think I can give it up, I cook Asian food too often and it’s basically irreplaceable

[Anonymous No.11588211]

>>11588054
It's pure fucking poison that converts to trans fats in your body. Dont take my word for it, I urge you to do some research into what oils and fats are actually safe to use.

[Anonymous No.11588227]

>>11588211
There's no consensus on the issue, so I just follow the rule of thumb that makes sense. If the fat can simply be squeezed out, it's fine. If you need a more elaborate industrial process, leave it alone. It was never meant to be consumed in concentrated form. So sesame, olive, and coconut oils are all fine in my book.

[Anonymous No.11588237]

>>11588227
Any oils derived from seeds are bad. Olive and Coconut are great. Sesame not so much.

[Anonymous No.11588260]

>>11587984
Fathead pizza is amazing

[Anonymous No.11589938]

I have a twitter https://twitter.com/ketonibba

[Anonymous No.11589955]

>>11588237
>>oils derived from seeds are bad
You mean like coconut?

[Anonymous No.11589995]

>obese anons shit on someone for eating plenty of veggies and and avoiding candy and soda because they don’t like joe rogan
>all while claiming shoveling cheeseburgers and ice cream into your head hole is better than just not eating and drinking diabetes paste several times a day
I don’t understand this. I know that any extreme diets can’t be good, but if someone substitutes fresh vegetables, nuts, greens etc for deep fried extra large McDonald’s meals daily you can’t honestly believe keto is worse in that case right?

[Anonymous No.11590078]

>>11587841
>keto
How did a poorly tolerated medicinal dietary regimen for intractable childhood epilepsy largely made obsolete by anticonvulsant drugs 70 years ago turn into a fad diet everyone here is apparently eating? Why do fat people feel the need to try every possible alternative in existence instead of abiding by the blatantly obvious solution of eating fewer calories?

[Anonymous No.11590111]

>>11590078
because they possess no self-control. they've deluded themselves into thinking that eating piles of greasy shit is good for them.

[Anonymous No.11590117]

>>11590078
Easy. People are stupid. They're always searching desparately for some kind of magic bullet to fix their health problems, and they're always looking for a new bogeyman to blame their health problems on instead of their own laziness.

Keto addresses both. It's a simple diet that people don't have to think much about. It's also easy for them to blame their problems on those evil carbs. Whether or not it actually works is totally immaterial.

[Anonymous No.11590139]

>>11590078
Because they discovered it was good for weight loss and other ailments.

[Anonymous No.11590150]

>>11587873
If you go over 20 grams of carbs (20 is a hard cut off regardless of height and weight and other body factors) you don't get the ketogynesis

[Anonymous No.11590157]

>>11590078
because carbs make me feel sluggish and tired if I eat more than maybe 20g a day. I was doing keto before I knew it was even a thing and until my body can tolerate carbs like a normie I'll keep eating almost no carbs

[Anonymous No.11590166]

Yeah, I eat literally nothing but scallops. My Macros are literally 100% protein no carbs and no fats.

[Anonymous No.11590177]

>>11590078
How is eating unprocessed meats and veggies a fad diet?

[Anonymous No.11590194]

>>11590078
Because people realized that the post 1970's health guidelines are garbage and that high carb/sugar diets increase your insulin resistance, cause heart disease, and give you diabetes.

[Anonymous No.11590208]

>>11590194
what are they going to do when they realize in 10 years that this meme diet destroys your kidneys?

[Anonymous No.11590259]

>>11590177
don't reply to triggered fatties.

[Anonymous No.11590267]

>>11590208
>the keto diet is less than 10 years old.
It was known during the atkins era (atkins stage 1)

[Anonymous No.11590270]

>>11590208
How does eating meat and veggies destroy your kidneys?

[Anonymous No.11590274]

>hurrrr keto is a fucking MEME diet dood
>primarily eating meat and vegetables is a meme now
>avoiding artificial refined sugars is a meme now

t. American government dictating young children need 9 servings of grain a day gotta push those corn subsidies.

[Anonymous No.11590277]

>>11590270
not what keto is and not entertaining your question unless you rephrase it properly

[Anonymous No.11590282]

>>11590274
Kek it would be just as easy to say that the American public is brainwashed to consume egregious amounts of protein

[Anonymous No.11590290]

>>11590277
That's exactly what keto is.

[Anonymous No.11590294]

>>11590277
>not what keto is
it doesn't even know what it's arguing against.
you can't make this shit up!

[Anonymous No.11590311]

>Switch cattle's food from grass to corn to fatten them up.
>They die within two months of eating the new high carb diet.

The lizard overlords are just trying to fatten us up!

[Anonymous No.11590324]

New website on how to do keto right.
Not a lot of content right now but it's still new
instagram/ketocantlose/

[Anonymous No.11590344]

Kek I think ketofags have surpassed vegans in how obnoxious they are. What is it with cult diets attracting the insufferable? At least vegans are ostensibly doing it for a moral purpose

[Anonymous No.11590360]

Keto doesn't work but just by virtue of what they're eating in order to cut out carbs they still manage to be healthier than most Americans regardless.

An ineffective cult diet is better than fat fucks eating out every day and drinking their fizzy juice

[Anonymous No.11590361]

>>11590344
>Cult diet

It's fucking meat and vegetables.

[Anonymous No.11590368]

>>11590194
>high carb/sugar diets increase your insulin resistance, cause heart disease, and give you diabetes.
Only in the indirect sense that eating too many calories from any diet would make you overweight. Those problems are caused by being overweight / obese, not by high carbohydrate ratios or having a high portion of your calories coming from sugar. *After* you become diabetic the kinds of food you eat including sugar content start to matter a lot and can cause you great harm if you don't manage your food choices properly. But if you're not already diabetic it's putting on too much weight that's the risk factor for future diagnosis, not sugar. In fact my saying this is basically a tautology since being significantly harmed by spikes in blood sugar would be another way of saying you're already insulin resistant or full blown diabetic. Your weight is what breaks you, while the blood sugar fluctuations are what fuck you over after you're already broken.

[Anonymous No.11590369]

>>11590360
>doesn't work
>will make you healthier

Hmmmmmmm

[Anonymous No.11590379]

>>11590344
and ketofags are the opposite of vegan idealism.
Ketofags are pragmatic.

[Anonymous No.11590396]

>>11590368
Maybe you should read some actual scientific research on the subject, instead of making things up.

[Anonymous No.11590436]

>>11590290
>>11590294
No. You have to eat a high amount of fat with a moderate (sub 100g) of protein to stay in ketosis. Otherwise, you'll just convert protein to glucose and you'll never hit ketosis. 100g of protein isn't even 400 calories. You'd have to eat somewhere around 150g of fat even as a manlet. Now what replaces the glucose from carbs/protein when you're in ketosis? Enjoy your kidney failure.

[Anonymous No.11590449]

>>11590436
So our kidneys didn't start working until 10,000 years ago?

[Anonymous No.11590462]

>>11587904
No they don't. Carbs are the healthiest thing you can eat, that's why healthy foods like vegetables have them and unhealthy foods like meat doesnt.

[Anonymous No.11590478]

>>11588237
>oils derived from seeds are bad
>Coconut oil is great
Couldn't even fit one sentence in between before contradicting yourself, ketard. Great job!

[Anonymous No.11590486]

>>11588260
You should try an actual pizza sometime

[Anonymous No.11590492]

>>11590462

[Anonymous No.11590512]

>>11590361
No it isnt. Pay attention to the adults on this thread, you might learn something. Keto will kill you. Although it is hilarious to watch you lemming faggots rushing off that keto cliff, tbqh.

[Anonymous No.11590537]

>>11590449
There are already studies of kidney failure due to over processing ketones. There are tons of anecdotal reports of kidney stones while in ketosis. No, the body is not used to having empty glycogen storages.

[Anonymous No.11590544]

>>11590368
Congratulations for publicly admitting your complete lack of comprehension of basic endocrinology. Not everyone has that kind of courage, or that level of retardation for that matter.

[Anonymous No.11590568]

>>11590537
There are actual studies with hard numbers of kidney stones while not in ketosis. So fuck right off with your kiddy grade innuendo, vegan faggot.

[Anonymous No.11590580]

>>11590379
>Ketofags are pragmatic.
>be fatass
>cant stop eating bacon and butter
>invent meme diet requiring me to eat bacon and butter
yep, they're pragmatic alright. Dumb as fuck, but pragmatic.

[Anonymous No.11590603]

>>11590568
>people get kidney stones while not in ketosis so going on a diet that puts even more strain on your kidneys is a good idea

[Anonymous No.11590614]

>>11590603
you keep saying that but there is no proofs.
Even renal doctors are seeing better results from people with CKD on ketogentic diets.

[Anonymous No.11590775]

>>11590368
>eating too much food makes you fat
>indirect

[Anonymous No.11590811]

>>11590775
It is indirect. Because you could replace whatever you ate with any other foods of the same calories and you would get the same result. That means it's not the kind of food that's the problem, it's being overweight / obese from excessive calorie intake.
>>11590396
>>11590544
Why don't you try reading actual studies yourself? The major risk factor everyone agrees on for diabetes is being overweight, not sugar.

[Anonymous No.11590826]

>>11590544
>>11590811
Also, while I shouldn't have to explicitly point this out, we're obviously talking about type 2 here.

[Anonymous No.11590845]

Reminder it's calories that's the problem, not where you're getting them from.
https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/90/6/1453/4598059
>Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity
Reminder the biggest predictor for type 2 diabetes is your weight, not what kind of food you eat.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635590/
>Most people with type 2 diabetes are overweight or obese: more than 85% of people with type 2 diabetes in southeast Scotland in 2005 had a body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared) of over 25. Recent evidence indicates that high waist circumference may be an even better indicator than body mass index (BMI) of increased risk of type 2 diabetes.
Reminder you lose weight even on a vending machine snack diet if you take care of calorie restriction.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/index.html
>Twinkies. Nutty bars. Powdered donuts.
>For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too.
>His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most -- not the nutritional value of the food.
>The premise held up: On his "convenience store diet," he shed 27 pounds in two months.
>For a class project, Haub limited himself to less than 1,800 calories a day. A man of Haub's pre-dieting size usually consumes about 2,600 calories daily. So he followed a basic principle of weight loss: He consumed significantly fewer calories than he burned.
>His body mass index went from 28.8, considered overweight, to 24.9, which is normal. He now weighs 174 pounds.

[Anonymous No.11590904]

>>11590811
If you had identical twins who ate exactly the same amount of calories every day and one at nothing but spinach and the other ate nothing but chocolate cake, they would not be equally healthy.

>>11590826
He was obviously just pointing out the effect of insulin on weight.

[Anonymous No.11590916]

>>11590845
Yes, you can loose weight on a fastfood/processed food diet.
You still won't be healthy.

[Anonymous No.11590928]

>>11590904
>equally healthy
"Healthy" is pretty vague, and also we're talking about weight and diabetes, not vitamin deficiencies. Stop moving the goalposts.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19246357
>Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates.
>CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7096307_Ketogenic_low-carbohydrate_diets_have_no_metabolic_advantage_over_nonketogenic_low-carbohydrate_diets
>Ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets have no metabolic advantage over nonketogenic low-carbohydrate diets
>KLC and NLC diets were equally effective in reducing body weight and insulin resistance, but the KLC diet was associated with several adverse metabolic and emotional effects. The use of ketogenic diets for weight loss is not warranted.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385608
>Energy expenditure and body composition changes after an isocaloric ketogenic diet in overweight and obese men.
>The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity posits that habitual consumption of a high-carbohydrate diet sequesters fat within adipose tissue because of hyperinsulinemia and results in adaptive suppression of energy expenditure (EE). Therefore, isocaloric exchange of dietary carbohydrate for fat is predicted to result in increased EE, increased fat oxidation, and loss of body fat. In contrast, a more conventional view that "a calorie is a calorie" predicts that isocaloric variations in dietary carbohydrate and fat will have no physiologically important effects on EE or body fat.
>CONCLUSION: The isocaloric KD was not accompanied by increased body fat loss but was associated with relatively small increases in EE that were near the limits of detection with the use of state-of-the-art technology.

[Anonymous No.11590929]

>>11590845
Calories is the only thing that matters I regards to body weight, but body weight isn't the only factor which determines health (despite some some illnesses like diabetes being linked to weight specifically). You can be a normal weight of even underweight and still have both micronutrient deficiencies and an unheslthy body fat percentage.

That's literally why "skinny fat" exists as a term.

[Anonymous No.11590947]

>be beta ketofag
>harm reducer
>lives exclusively off exogenous ketone supplements, refined MCT oil, and buttered coffee
>trend follower
>afraid of protein
>counts macros and calories neurotically
>slow metabolism from ill-advised fasting regimens
>loses tons of weight rapidly (mostly lean muscle mass)
>produces excess ketones that just get pissed away
>spontaneously combusts for a moment before melting into a pile of semi-congealed fat

>be alpha chad ZC carnivore
>abstainer
>eats exclusively from the animal kingdom (3+lbs of steak daily plus whatever else)
>trailblazer
>afraid of nothing
>hasn't counted a macro or calorie ever
>metabolism gets faster the more he eats
>loses excess body fat and gains lean muscle mass swiftly without even having to lift
>fucks your bitch, instantaneously impregnating her with maximally virile seed

Someone should make this an infographic.

[Anonymous No.11590955]

>>11590580
>complaining about losing weight while eating what you want
not very pragmatic. Not sorry triggering you and your ideals.

[Anonymous No.11590989]

>>11590947
>gains lean muscle mass swiftly without even having to lift
Muscle where? In your fingers from shitposting? To build muscle, you must tear muscle

[Anonymous No.11590992]

>be brainwashed garbovorous poop factory
>buy into CICO dogma
>eat 1500 calories of cheetos daily
>turn orange before dying of digestive cancer before the age of 30

>be lean mean carnivorous meatpilling machine
>debunk (((bad science))) simply by flexing
>eat 4-6000 calories of ribeyes daily
>easily convert vegans and factory food addicts within two seconds of eye contact
>live as long and healthy as humanly possible, procreating with your ever-growing harem well past the age of 100

[Anonymous No.11591001]

today is my keto cheat day but I can't decide if I want spaghetti of Hamburger Helper for dinner.
pls help.

[Anonymous No.11591032]

>>11590929
I don't deny the existence of scurvy or anemia. I'm denying the bullshit myth that carbs / sugar is a risk factor for becoming diabetic when it's being overweight (regardless of where your calories came from) that's the risk factor. People are mistaking the things dangerous for you after your body's already broken for the things that broke your body. By analogy the flu doesn't cause AIDS just because people with AIDS die can't handle catching the flu. Or for another analogy, cold temperatures don't cause coronary heart disease just because people with coronary heart disease react badly to cold temperatures.

[Anonymous No.11591036]

>>11590078
Keto isn't new. Atkins was popular too and it's pretty much the same thing, just with a larger carb allowance. It's also shown to help insulin resistance. Fat people are usually type 2 diabetic, or prediabetic so eating low carb helps them. Couple it with calorie restriction, and better feelings of satiation due to higher fat intake, and it causes easy weight loss. You can still eat cheese, meat, butter, etc but lose weight. However, the calorie restriction is the important part because obviously eating 3lbs of cheese a day is bad for you. So it still requires dieting it just has a spin on it that helps fat people with their problems.

[Anonymous No.11591051]

>>11590947
You would have to make it yourself because you're the only one on /ck/ who posts about doing this retarded "carnivore diet." At least get some new pictures, you're making me feel some weird kind of sympathetic embarrassment by proxy just from watching you do this here all the time.

[Anonymous No.11591056]

>>11591051
>you're making me feel some weird kind of sympathetic embarrassment
That’s just called pity, anon.

[Anonymous No.11591077]

>>11590845
>Reminder the biggest predictor for type 2 diabetes is your weight, not what kind of food you eat.
Eating carbs causes your insulin levels to spike. Over time, continuous spiking causes your cells to become insulin resistant. Your body stops using available blood sugar because it can't recognize insulin as easily. So excess blood sugar builds up. This is what type 2 diabetes is. It's proven medical fact that protein and fats don't trigger as much of an insulin response and if eaten in proper proportions, can maintain a lower level of blood sugar. This causes your body to desensitize to the insulin and you can start using blood sugar properly again.

You're literally just googling shit and posting selective quotes from abstracts as if they support your claim. Saying that weight is a larger indicator of type 2 diabetes just means that being fat correlates to having diabetes. It doesn't disprove that eating fats and proteins in a higher proportion help you lose weight or are an effective way to battle type 2 diabetes. Learn 2 medical science you brainlet.

[Anonymous No.11591099]

>>11591077
>It doesn't disprove that eating fats and proteins in a higher proportion help you lose weight
Here you go:
>>11590928
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19246357
>Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates.
>CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7096307_Ketogenic_low-carbohydrate_diets_have_no_metabolic_advantage_over_nonketogenic_low-carbohydrate_diets
>Ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets have no metabolic advantage over nonketogenic low-carbohydrate diets
>KLC and NLC diets were equally effective in reducing body weight and insulin resistance, but the KLC diet was associated with several adverse metabolic and emotional effects. The use of ketogenic diets for weight loss is not warranted.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385608
>Energy expenditure and body composition changes after an isocaloric ketogenic diet in overweight and obese men.
>The carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity posits that habitual consumption of a high-carbohydrate diet sequesters fat within adipose tissue because of hyperinsulinemia and results in adaptive suppression of energy expenditure (EE). Therefore, isocaloric exchange of dietary carbohydrate for fat is predicted to result in increased EE, increased fat oxidation, and loss of body fat. In contrast, a more conventional view that "a calorie is a calorie" predicts that isocaloric variations in dietary carbohydrate and fat will have no physiologically important effects on EE or body fat.
>CONCLUSION: The isocaloric KD was not accompanied by increased body fat loss but was associated with relatively small increases in EE that were near the limits of detection with the use of state-of-the-art technology.
>You're just googling shit
It's called evidence. Try finding some for your shit argument here.

[Anonymous No.11591103]

>>11591077
I don’t have a horse in this race but I was curious so I did a little research. https://muscleevo.net/should-you-eat-carbs-and-fat-together/ was interesting, though it seems to suggest that, in some cases, meat has a comparable insulin-speaking effect to most carbohydrates.

[Anonymous No.11591110]

>>11591056
>That’s just called pity, anon.
No. What I'm talking about is less compassionate and more selfish. I feel personal discomfort in the same way I'd feel if I were him and becoming embarrassed by my own behavior.

[Anonymous No.11591117]

>>11591051
>>11591056
Feed me more delicious (you)s. Your agenda would be better served not replying to me at all. Too bad CIDF (Carbage Internet Defense Force) wouldn't pay you that way. I'm fucking winning. I won't stop until meatposting takes over the entire memesphere.

cringe
/krinj/
verb
verb: cringe; 3rd person present: cringes; past tense: cringed; past participle: cringed; gerund or present participle: cringing

1.
bend one's head and body in fear or in a servile manner.
"he cringed away from the blow"
synonyms: cower, shrink, recoil, shy away, flinch, blench, draw back

Keep kneeling, while you project, plebs. Deep down, you're only embarrased and disgusted with yourselves.

[Anonymous No.11591131]

>>11591110
Funny enough, Hume thinks that this is the true impetus behind any sort of sympathy—an embarrassment/pain on the part of the perceiver who reflexively puts themselves in the place of the perceived. So any sort of traditional ‘pity’ or ‘sympathy’ you feel is, according to Hume, self-interested (in that you wish to alleviate their pain so that you don’t have to encounter this mental discomfort again).

[Anonymous No.11591145]

>>11591117
I'm just asking you to get some new pictures so it isn't as obvious you're this one schizophrenic pushing a bizarre "carnivore diet" that nobody else subscribes to. And while you do make me feel embarrassed on your behalf I guess you're ultimately a good thing in that you're a really effective unintentional parody of keto dieters.

[Anonymous No.11591198]

>>11591103
Neat, though I'll point out I don't deny that different foods have different impacts on blood sugar / insulin response. I just disagree that those differences matter for *becoming* diabetic as opposed to mattering after you're already diabetic and unable to handle it. The overwhelmingly agreed upon number one risk factor for diabetes is your weight, and it's not some conditional thing where it only counts if you gained weight through a high carbohydrate ratio diet. The risk factor is simply being overweight, full stop.

[Anonymous No.11591245]

NICE RECIPES FAGS!

[Anonymous No.11592186]

>>11590603
Ketosis dissolves kidney stones, causing existing stones to detach from the kidney wall and start moving. It you were unlucky enough to have a large stone before ketosis then you might have to pass it earlier than you would otherwise.

[Anonymous No.11592197]

>>11591131
That's exactly right how could anyone argue against that.

[Anonymous No.11592202]

>>11591036
>pretty much the same thing
Not even remotely true. Atkins has an unlimited protein allowance, keto doesnt.
>with a larger carb allowance
That is high enough to keep you out of ketosis, thus making it non-ketogenic
Fuck but you're retarded

[Anonymous No.11592403]

>>11592202
>Atkins has an unlimited protein allowance
Not in induction phase.
atkins allows the higher side of keto diet (20%) but it is in no way unlimited.

So if you eat 20% of your calories in protein you are doing both keto and atkins phase 1.

[Anonymous No.11594429]

>>11587882
>tell me why you should switch to keto and then Ill entertain your request
It's literally the best cure for Alzheimer.

[Anonymous No.11594437]

>>11587941
>cholesterol is bad for you
This has been debunked, stop regurgitating mom science. You're only at risk for heart disease if you have inflammation. Do you know what causes inflammation? Sugar and carbs.

[Anonymous No.11594447]

>>11590512
>meat and veg will kill you