/ck/ - Food & Cooking

[Anonymous No.10352031]

>instant noodles
>have to wait for water to boil
>have to add water to noodles
>have to wait for noodles to get soft
>have to add a bunch of shit to it using my hands

anyone else sick of the lies?

[Anonymous No.10352410]

Not to mention they all taste dull as fuck.

[Anonymous No.10352457]

>>10352031
there's no lies involved. everyone eating these knows exactly what they're doing.

[Anonymous No.10352466]

>>10352031
from the moment you perceive them, they are instantly noodles

[Anonymous No.10352484]

>>10352410
About as dull as the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

[Anonymous No.10352488]

>>10352484
based

[Anonymous No.10352497]

>>10352031
They're also salty as fuck.

[Anonymous No.10352533]

>>10352466
huh?

[Anonymous No.10352566]

>>10352484
underrated toast

[Anonymous No.10352573]

these are alright but they're expensive for what they are
>packet of sauce
>tiny packet of hokkien
>$4 for a tiny unsatisfying meal
if they can sell these for $1 each they'd be worth it

[Anonymous No.10352678]

>>10352533
checked
yer doin god's work
an i like yer butt

[Anonymous No.10352982]

>>10352484
>"No!"

[Anonymous No.10353005]

>>10352031

Indo mie is complete garbage.

[Anonymous No.10353126]

>>10353005
nah m8