[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking

View post   
File: 382 KB, 586x411, home-chili-cans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6728119 No.6728119 [Reply] [Original]

Daily reminder that chili has beans in it.

>chili cheese dogs have beans therefore chili has beans

>> No.6728134

>>6728119

If that's true then why is there an extra line on the label to add "with beans"? Wouldn't that be redundant?

>> No.6728136

Only faggots put beans in chili.

>> No.6728190

Why wouldnt you bean your chili? Beans are delicious and only compliment the many flavors of a good chili

>> No.6728200

I think "chili" should have beans however, "chile" doesn't need meat or beans cause it's that good :^)

>> No.6728207

>>6728119
But doesn't the fact that the chili has to advertize "With beans" mean that if you take off the "With beans" chili would be without them??

So if chili should have beans, the can would just say "chili" and it would just automatically have beans in it.

>> No.6728232
File: 140 KB, 330x330, c2c291ef-9863-4e67-af99-03234256410f.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6728232

>>6728207
There's more cans that just say chili that have beans. If chili doesn't have beans it always says so.

>> No.6728290

chili does not have beans. i don't have to prove it. its just true.

>> No.6728294

>>6728232
>than what is chili
I feel an existential crisis coming on.

>> No.6728320

>>6728119
fuck chili, how about a real question.

Is Chiavetta's really barbeque?
>plebs answer: yes
>true American's answer: no

>> No.6729025

>Frito pie with wolf brand chili

>> No.6729031

>>6728134
>>6728207
>sugar cookies
Why bother mentioning sugar when sugar is a key ingredient in cookies, and people eat cookies for the sweetness?

>> No.6729087

>>6729031
>Being this obtuse.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/crossover-cookies-a-savory-alternative-to-sweet-bite-size-holiday-treats/2014/12/02/104be378-7434-11e4-a589-1b102c2f81d0_story.html

>> No.6729094

>>6729087
All I see are some jewish liberal special snowflake contrarian recipes.

>> No.6729096
File: 14 KB, 125x126, 204-hank-hill-whatever.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6729096

>>6728119
Why the hell would you put chili on a hot dog? You Americans are so stupid and fat.

>> No.6730710

>>6729025
It's good>>6729096
Stfu

>> No.6730728

Is there any food that people autisticly argue as much over precisely which ingredients can and cannnot go into? I know people argue all the time about the composition of their favorite dishes but I feel like no one can ever mention chili without starting an argument of "hurr that's not real chili".

>> No.6730734

>>6730728
We take chili seriously on /ck/. If you don't like that go to cooking with reddit.

>> No.6730748

Why on earth wouldn't you want the marvelous textural contrast that beans add to chili? Are you immune to proper food prepared right?

Texans are so fucking delusional. Go ahead, secede for all I care.

>> No.6730750

>>6730734
But why chili exactly? Why are people so gung ho about a fucking meat stew?

There are a million dishes as complex and interesting, and many more so. Why do chili aficionados base their pride and identity on this one food?

>> No.6730756

lurk moar

>> No.6732097

Why is it that authentic chili is serious business, but authentic Irish stew makes you a social pariah?