/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>5399251
It's a good thing. Nobody eats half a pack of ramen or 1/3 of a can of soup.

>>5399251
doesn't matter, fatties gonna fat

>>5399251
yes please
>follow instructions on rice to make 6 servings for curry night
>makes barely enough for two people

fuck california

I can't wait to see proper 4 digits sodium numbers on chef boyardi. Maybe they'll stop marketing it as food for kids.

I think a good thing. Regardless of your thoughts on nutritional value, no one believes there are 2.5 servings in a 15.5 oz can of chef boyardee baqsgetie and meatwads. get real. when is the last time you ate 1/2 cup of dry cereal. or 1/4 cup ice cream. For that matter, unless unless owning/running the bar, the last time you poured a 1.5 oz drink. I might be ameritard/fat but no one I know eats 3 oz of fish or chicken, an oz of cheese or 7 potato chips.what bs.

>>5399269
except people who aren't fat

>>5399251
>Dr. Hamburg
hahahaha oh god

>>5399345

> mfw someone ate 1/3 of a can of soup near me

Won't change anything. Amerilards still gonna Amerilard.

amerfats will think "more is better" and will end up even fatter

>>5399251
>A BIG bag of caramel corn (tm)
OOH!
>50 calories
OOOOH!!!
>per kernel
......................................kay.

>>5399292
>2014
>caring about sodium

>>5399409
trying2hard

>I can't do math, please tell me how much to eat, Mr. Obama!

No.

How many people actually bother to read food labels but then neglect to check serving sizes? Seems like a half measure. I'd guess that the people at whom this measure is aimed don't even read labels at all.

>>5399557
A 18-oz bottle of soda should be 1 serving, not 2.5, and you fucking KNOW it

A serving of bread is one slice. You can't make a sandwich with one slice of bread. C'mon!

>>5399251
>ppl aren't reading nutrition labels

THE ONLY SOLUTION IS TO MAKE PEOPLE CHANGE THEM. THEY'LL PAY ATTENTION THEN!

>>5399251
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2616576/Subway-removes-ham-pork-nearly-200-stores-strong-demand-Muslims-eat-Halal-meat.html

they should make it per4oz or per100g like rest of the civilized world

>>5399653
you guys are acting like this is somehow a bad change
like /v/ whining about how casuals are ruining their franchises, fatties have ruined your nutrition labels
the fucking serving size system was completely nonsensical how is this a bad thing

I hope they do this in the UK

30g of cereal is basically nothing, but that's what they count as a typical serving

>>5399660

Revising serving sizes is great but, except for that one tweak, all the other changes are bad.

>>5399674
those
stupid
fucking
fatties
holy shit
what have they done
this is not even remotely ok
why the fuck aren't you people complaining more

>>5399569
It's not the government's place to decide our fucking portion sizes.

>>5399251
That's stupid. Its your fault if you decide to eat more than 3 slices of bread per serving, changing it from 2 is stupid. Just coz faddass eats more than what is suggested doesn't mean we have to make their brains lazy and fat too by adjusting the calories correctly, its basic math. For bread its just 1 + 0.5 of the value indicated

>>5399689
fuck off you crazy cunt there are bigger issues at hand
like the entire rest of the fucking nutrition page
jesus christ how can you stupid little niggers whine about the serving size change it wasn't even logical before and now we have some semblance of reasoning
but thats the fucking thing you decide to piss around about
despite so much more devastating design changes

truly the cancer

It is all kind of useless. Everyone KNOWS what is healthy and what is not. Unless they live in a cave they know dousing a salad in creamy dressing and topping it with cheese and bread is bad for them. Them having the numbers isn't going to help that much. If they're too lazy to calculate it as is or make better choices in the first place, they're just going to stay fat.

But I suppose it is better than doing nothing and just paying for diabetes forever.

I like how everyone actively hates on fatties, yet if some entity makes a move that might actually make them realize the truth about portions, you people piss and moan.

What do you care about the "stupidity" of people who can't read the old nutrition label? Or are you all just so autistic that despite your "smarts" anything new sends you into a blind panic? Grow up tardlettes.

May as well have the mandated nutrition info on packages be accurate.