/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>Register

yeeeeah, no. We just post in the thread with tripcodes and timestamps.

Don't try to complicate a formula that worked and was relatively streamlined. You're trying to encourage people to participate, not put them off with byzantine layers of autism.

Challengers will be judged on the following creative and technical aspects:

- Idea
- Presentation
- Composition
- Taste
- Texture
- Aroma

- Ingredients
- Technique
- Compositing
- Planning
- Effort
- Realization

>>5092890
seconding this.

This round's secret ingredient is: Salt.

Your dish must include, use, or showcase salt in one way or another.

>>5092893
>Texture
>Aroma
This appears to be le troll du troll.

>>5092894
>>5092890

Yup, you have to type your username and tripcode in a form because I'm not copy/pasting all of them one by one. Thank you for the effort.

The prior formula didn't work. The proof is that, if I wasn't doing it, there would not be a challenge.

This is not even a challenge, it's just a test.

This thread is also not to discuss it, it was discussed earlier this week.

Registering? Salt? Taste and texture?

Yeah I was gonna enter but you've turned this into a fucking joke Sceak, fuck off

>>5092903
best of luck

>>5092904
is that who it is? I know that guy was incredibly jealous because for the 2 months it was running last year, he couldn't pretend he was a big fish in a small pond and everyone ignored him.

>>5092901

Do you not have imagination? Can you base your imaginings on known facts? Can you see a picture of tomato sauce with red wine and oregano, and imagine what it smells like?

Like I said, this is a test.

>>5092912
Jesus you're an idiot

>>5092904

It's not a joke, it's a test. It's meant to test the way it's going to work if it happens for real.

>>5092911

I never cared for the /ck/ Challenge. I don't compete. I don't enter in competition, I many times refused to enter in competition. I never participated in the /ck/ challenge.

>>5092912
nope, it's a troll and once the troll has been called, it stops working.

This looks like one of the angry guy contestants who was voted off early last year and then spammed the rest of the competition with the same "anonymous voting doesn't work" "voting on food you can't taste is a jok" type bullshit.

Gr7 b7 m7.

>>5092921
you're probably the least suitable and least capable of running this thing then. please stop.

-If- this test format doesn't pan out I am still willing to run a full marathon format challenge later in spring/early summer.

Still curious to see how this will turn out, however. Will be monitoring the thread.

Oh! You didn't give a "due date" for your entries. Might want to fix that OP.

>>5092931
Agreed, no idea why anyone thought this autistic psychopath should run anything

>>5092931
Sceak isn't even capable of caring for himself so this entire thread is top lel

>>5092932
You have proven credentials from last year and know how it goes. I'll probably skip this and wait for your version. Will you run it as close to last year's contest in format?

>>5092954
Right?
>>5092955
Same, I'll wait for Bubbles version.

>>5092946
>>5092954
Both true. I know Sceak had major ass pain throughout the whole contest last year, and several people thought he was the major spammer.

These shitty judgement categories make it look like he's running this contest to wreck it, so that he can be center of attention for a while.

>>5092932

Theres no due date, it's just a test. Can't you make a tripcode and post a pic of a bag of cheetos or something?

>>5092962

I think I posted once in all the challenge threads. I got banned for it, too.

>>5092903
No, you fucking autist fag, the previous formula worked fine, it's just that hearts is too busy with real life to do it this year.

>>5092932
Bless your sweet little heart Bubble Burst. (Pye here). This one isn't going to pan out well, but I'm curious to see what happens with it, lol.

>>5093063

I fell in love. I don't really have the energy for this, but a lot of people were asking for it.

I wish Hearts was here. They ran a real contest! People did cool shit. Borneo was still here ;-;

/ck/ is going downhill

It's been real nice knowing you all. I'm sure Sceak running a cooking challenge is one of the signs of the apocalypse.

>>5092932
I'm with Bubble, sceak is already starting to get sceaky.
>complaining about copypasting trips
Goddamnit, don't do a challenge then.

>gays causing drama again

what else is new

>>5094352
>Borneo

>>5094825
>You'll never get to see Borneo's gifs of her, her dress up or her delicious looking food
>You'll never get to share laksa recipes

>>5094844
what is up with that fat armpit cleavage?

>>5094808
>>5093069
>>5092959

You guys are making me blush. Thanks for the vote of confidence.

Are there categories? Because I have a quadruple chocolate cake that is simultaneously glorious and pig-disgusting. It is seriously like eating a cake-textured chocolate bar.

>>5094844
>Implying she's anything to look at.
2/10 would lose appetite.
Quit posting, Born.

>>5097727
>Implying you wouldn't wreck that chubby SEA behind

Please.

>>5097727
Just mount her when she's crouching to clean the oven, quick and dity.

>>5097770
>>5097739
>You will never get to lift up Borneo's toga whilst she is slaving over the stove and lovingly take her from behind
Feels bad, man

>>5097739
>>5098222

Would I wreck it? Probably. I would fuck almost any clean, free of disease, non-obese woman who has even the resemblance of a personality.

Whether I would fuck that chubby SEA or not isn't an indicator of anything of merit. It is not saying she is attractive by any means.

so, the original formula was fine. This whole new way of judging is ill conceived.

1. Not everyone is going to have the confidence to participate in the first couple of rounds. So by making the contestants sign up ahead of time will isolate people that would have otherwise gotten into the game later.
also, the timestamp/identifier thing works points taken off for challenge goals if the forget.
2. >>5092893 these requirements are over complicated. Less categories would be better.
Idea, presentation, composition could be replace with just originality and presentation. Judging the presentation would encompass the composition anyway. Imagined taste,texture, aroma could be replaced with "subjective appeal". The above categories already cover if the dish looks pretty, and is well arranged, but if the ratios sound off or the ingredient combinations off putting then "subjective appeal" would cover that. Lastly, you would need a category to cover if the contestant met the requirements of the theme of the round, especially if restrictions or special requirements were imposed (as in the case of being a penalty) . You could just call it "achievements unlocked" or "challenge goals" or "theme satisfaction" if you want to be different.
The following would be covered by the categories above:
> Ingredients
challenge goals
>Technique
presentation
> Compositing
presentation/subjective appeal
>Planning
subjective appeal
>Effort
subjective appeal
>Realization
challenge goals

3. I don't know what to say about the google docs voting. It is a good way to keep everything in order, but if you could add a "notes" section for the judge to leave feedback if he wishes it would be better. The feedback from the judges is very important in this competition. You could post a link to a cut and past site like paste bin. with each of the contestants "notes" cut and pasted from the form onto one sheet for each contestant. Other folks would be able to view this information too

sceak is going to get banned a week into the challenge and the whole thing will crumble. I still look forward to this ensuing shitstorm.

Am I the only one whos highly amused that the challenge is hosted by Sceak, of all people? seems unreal.

>>5099096
Given the amount of time Sceak has put into this board, I'm not entirely surprised.

Has anybody discussed the possibility of getting any competition stickied? There was a lot of drama about it last competition but I'm personally in favour of keeping it unstickied. It would also allow the competition to be much more manageable for the new host.