[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 750 KB, 2048x1536, lunch 013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430378 No.4430378 [Reply] [Original]

what kinda lunches do you guys bring to work?

<<kaiser roll, miracle whip, honey ham, swiss, dill pickle and dijon


oh, and cheetos
gotta have cheetos

>> No.4430384

First!

>> No.4430386
File: 756 KB, 2048x1536, lunch 005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430386

>>4430378
there are 2 pickles on there btw
not just one for the pic
you can see the other slice from this angle

>> No.4430387

We get it. You have a gun. Woop de fucking do.

>> No.4430395

>>4430378

There has been a SERIOUS influx of shitposting around kaiser rolls lately.

>> No.4430398

Do you also bring that .357 to work also? mmmmmmmm

>> No.4430403
File: 14 KB, 216x350, http-_uberhumor.com_million-dollar-idea-you-guys2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430403

hey progun haven't seen you around for while. How you doin buddy?

>> No.4430405

>Not a wrap

So I take it that you lost your penis in some kind of freak bowling accident, yes?

>> No.4430406
File: 757 KB, 2048x1536, lunch 004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430406

>>4430398
i do also bring that .357 to work sometimes also, yes, but usually my XD-40
>>4430403
i'm always around. doing fine.
how are you?

>> No.4430419
File: 42 KB, 550x365, 4907237119_34f66a9b0c_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430419

>>4430406
pretty good kind been head down working for awhile i think its time to come up for a breath.

Your sandwich looks awesome I'd hit that.

>> No.4430423
File: 1018 KB, 500x700, 1360592232766.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430423

bar the miracle whip, that looks pretty good

>> No.4430425
File: 311 KB, 1195x1600, 5brz9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430425

>>4430406
do you wrap your lunch sandwich up with foil instead of sarand wrap or a ziploc bag?

>> No.4430426
File: 42 KB, 416x286, FreedomBurgers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430426

>Not eating an America burger

Are you a communist?

>> No.4430430

I usually bring a curry, if I have one made, or some pasta and pesto.

>> No.4430435
File: 742 KB, 2048x1536, 003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430435

>>4430419
restaurant quality sandwich isn't fair. i'm wrapping this shit up for lunch the next day.
>>4430425
depends on the size

>> No.4430447

>>4430426
Our country sucks ass. I can hardly make my way through the hoards of fat shit retards on the sidewalk.

>> No.4430452

Buy some corn tortillas, bake them until they're crisp, and put it in the sandwich. Thank me later

>> No.4430456

>>4430435
That looks really wet and gross. Toast it, if for no better reason than to dry it up a bit.

>> No.4430471

Hey anon, how do you pack your lunch?

>> No.4430476
File: 70 KB, 400x599, 400px-Alex_Lifeson3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4430476

>>4430435
lol no man i don't eat like that at work i don't eat at work at all really.

>> No.4430503

sourdough or baguette with dijon mustard, Genoa salami, brie, jalapenos and banana peppers. So good.

>> No.4430523

>>4430476
it was still a superior sandwich

>> No.4430545

Usually buy Boars Head meat and make sandwiches from it, been using bagels recently. generally just buy whichever roast beef or turkey is on sale that week

>> No.4431134
File: 13 KB, 191x234, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431134

>>4430378
>make sandwich the night before
>soggy shitpile
>working on the lord's day

>> No.4431137

>speed loader

casual

>> No.4431146

>being at work at 3 AM on a sunday
>having to bring a gun to work to feel safe
>fast food

Sometimes when I'm feeling bad, I come to /ck/ and it reminds me that someone, somewhere, always has it worse than me.

>> No.4431286

>>4431146
>having to bring a gun to work to feel safe

It might shock you, but there's millions of people that carry a gun every day whether they feel safe or not.
They might just be walking the dog around the block in their own neighborhood or going to 7-11 down the street.
Its about being responsible for your own safety and the safety of those around you.

Police don't prevent crime, they attempt to solve crime and punish the individuals that commit it.
There's not going to be anyone there to protect you when deshawn brown decides to knock over the minimart while you're getting your morning coffee and Hostess® Frosted Honey Bun™
Some people like to be responsible for their own safety

>> No.4431290

>>4431286
/pol/ please go

>> No.4431292

>>4431286
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Mall_shooting

>> No.4431296

>>4431286

Ah yes, the "government is too weak to handle law enforcement" argument. And yet they're so damm strong they're gonna come into 300 million homes and make everyone renounce Christ and give up their guns.

Which is it? Make up your mind, please.

>> No.4431297

Salad with blue cheese and hard boiled eggs

Rice balls with salmon and avocade

Homemade sushi

>> No.4431300

>>4430378

Looks tasty as hell. Glad to see some others that enjoy Miracle Whip. Most of my friends or even people I see posting online always talk shit about Miracle Whip for some reason.

>> No.4431303

>>4431286

And the fact very few guns prevent crimes, and are more likely to kill a family member rather than an intruder never penetrates that fantasy.

Just admit guns are for small dicks and being scared of a fist fight.

>> No.4431309

That's not even a real gun, OP. I'd be impressed if it was though.

For lunch, I usually make a salad.

>> No.4431317

>>4431300

Because it's a disgusting candy version of mayo beloved by midwesterners notorious for their bad taste (hotdish??).

>> No.4431334

>>4431303
Let me guess, you support the Brady Bunch?

>> No.4431338

>>4431296
>>4431303
not trying to make this a gun control debate. just stating fact, but obviously a house with a gun in it is more likely to have a resident shot with a gun. accidents happen.
if you didn't have a pool no one would drown in your yard and if you didn't have kitchen knives no one would accidentally cut themselves and if you didn't have tables and chairs you'd never stub you toe.
statistics can be very misleading

>> No.4431339

>>4431334

No, but Alice is a hardcore motherfucker

>> No.4431347

>>4431338

Except nobody harbors the delusion that having a swimming pool is going to make you safer from death by drowning. But gunfags seem to have this collective delusion that the ooga booga boogyman is the only possible way they or their loved ones are going to get shot. Whereas in fact, more likely, little 6 year old bobby joe is going to shoot little 7 year old cletus in the face when he finds the loaded gun under the mattress when mommy and daddy are out mud ridin'.

>> No.4431348

>>4431338

A kitchen knife has other uses. You can swim in a pool. You're just simply very unlikely to shoot an intruder, so much so that you're more likely to shoot a family member, or most likely yourself. Those statistics aren't misleading, it's just the simple truth.

>> No.4431355
File: 56 KB, 900x600, American-Gadsden[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431355

>>4431348
>>4431347
I think you're forgetting the reason why we were given guns in the first place

>> No.4431359

>>4431347
It CAN happen and that's why I own a gun. I don't want to have to rely on a 10+ min police response time to make sure me and my family is safe.

>> No.4431361
File: 16 KB, 400x320, reaction_image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431361

>>4431355
>we were given guns

What kind of confused revisionist history is this?

>> No.4431372

>>4431348
>implying guns don't have alternative uses.
Many guns are designed for the sole purpose of target shooting. A hobby of many people.

>> No.4431373

>>4431347

Who cares?

>> No.4431376

>>4431359

You've made your family much less safe by the math, faggot. Just admit you're a whiny bitch who wants to feel tough but is scared of fighting.

>> No.4431380
File: 18 KB, 490x350, dea-agent-sg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431380

>>4431372

And any gun designed for target shooting is going to make a piss-poor home defense weapon.

Stop rationalizing and just admit that you like guns because they're cool. I think they're cool too. Most people, in fact, also think so. Coming up with bullshit excuses like durr durr founding fathers and the boogyman is comin to git ya just makes you sound like you're not responsible enough to own one.

>> No.4431382

>>4431376
If you're unwilling to kill to save your babies, you should be deemed negligent and have your children given to a proper safety-conscious family.

>> No.4431384

>>4431355

Yes, because your .22 is going to take down a blackhawk helicopter.

The purpose of the 2nd Amendment WAS to make violent revolution possible. And it's totally an anachronism in the nuclear age. Unless you want people having RPGs, stop pretending your firearm prevents government tyranny.

>> No.4431388

>>4431347
Well if you're that retarded to leave a loaded gun in access to a child, though hidden, and your 6 and 7 year old home alone with no supervision, bad shit is going to happen, even if there wasn't a gun.

>> No.4431392

>>4431382

I'm quite willing to kill - I'm just not a pussy who needs a gun. Have fun burying your kid when he finds your gun.

>> No.4431394
File: 291 KB, 1600x1200, DHS_Pimpmobile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431394

>>4431384
People should have RPGs.

>> No.4431396

>>4431392
My guns are on my belt or in a safe. I'm not letting some gang of thugs break into my house and steal them either. Also good luck killing anything without equivalent force(criminals have guns, probability increases when they come in packs).

>> No.4431399

>>4431392

Again, who cares?

>> No.4431400

>>4431399

Is this like the new "umad"?

>> No.4431404

>>4431303
>>4431338
you're a candy ass from a rich white neighborhood and mommy and daddy sheltered you well as i kid i see.

>> No.4431403

>>4431399

I don't - I just have to worry about my kid going to school with a kid who can bring his dad's gun. His dad's coping mechanism for a small dick is a direct threat to my kid's safety.

>> No.4431407

>>4431396

Please - nobody is trying to break into your shitty trailer and steal your poor white trash belongings.

>> No.4431408

>>4431400

Your so upset that someone endangered their family by owning a gun you want them all banned. But you don't get upset over people having illiterate mexicans build their homes not up to code, own swimming pools prone to drownings, live in Tornado alley. You wont ban any of that - but GUNS is where you draw the line.

So why should anyone care?

>> No.4431409

>>4431396
Fuck off back to /k/

I was just there and saw a thread linking to this one. Nice job crying like a little bitch on /k/ and trying to get more people over here to get on your side.

Have fun with your sex toy.

>> No.4431411

>>4431303
lol get a load of this gun
>2013
>still being afraid of guns
try harder nigger

>> No.4431417

>>4431392
>gun safe

>> No.4431422

>>4431404

Actually I grew up with guns in my house. Part of the reason I know how shallow guntard's arguments are. And going to inner-city schools, I've seen how guns are just a shortcut for pussies who want to feel tough but are scared little faggots who won't fight without a gun.

Just admit you think guns are cool, and it's got nothing to do with safety.

>> No.4431423

>>4431384
the NVA, vietcong and taliban would like to have a word with you.

>> No.4431424

>>4431411
>2013
>living in a society where you have to have a gun to feel safe

Who really is the nigger? Sounds like yourself since you need a gun.

>> No.4431425
File: 125 KB, 863x577, k.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431425

>>4431409

oh wow

>> No.4431428

>>4431422

Who cares. Owning guns is a right :^)

>> No.4431430

>>4431422
>having a tool designed specifically for making a particular task easier makes you a pussy

You damned pussy, why do you use oven mitts? A real man like me just uses his bare hands.

>> No.4431432

>>4431428
>obsessively follow thread and reply to every post with "who cares"

I think I found the answer to your question

>> No.4431434

>>4431408

Funny how you know all these things nobody said.

There's plenty of laws about swimming pools and housing codes. But even suggesting we regulate your penis surrogate is TREASON. Legally my pool needs a fence, but if you can't buy a large clip so you can forget for a second what a beta fuck you are it's tyranny.

>> No.4431438

>>4431432
who cares

>> No.4431440
File: 28 KB, 500x333, 1362608597114.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431440

>>4431409
Seriously, even if there's 2 unarmed criminals in your house they're potentially on drugs and actually willing to break laws. Why would you willingly disarm yourself and put yourself and your family at a defensive disadvantage? Also my family taught me gun safety as a kid, and I double-learned it in the Scouts. No reason a kid should be in a gun-owning household without learning safety basics. They don't stick their hands on the stove either. NRA safety is actually becoming optional for public schools in my State.

Pic related, my /k/ sex toy.

>> No.4431441

>>4431384
>Unless you want people having RPGs

I support the right of all people to bear RPGs, nukes, and fighter jets, among other things. Seriously.

>> No.4431436

>>4431422

Will your fists be good enough when Jamal comes at you with a baseball bat? Exactly, shut the fuck up.

>> No.4431437
File: 699 KB, 2080x1544, 100_0454.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431437

Good Morning /ck/

>> No.4431442

>>4431422
i enjoy shooing, and i have guns for self defense. as a victim of home invasion, (ill look for the pics to prove it) i can tell you my ar became my best friend that night. the racking of the charging handle had them pissing on themselves.

you're just a bitch dude. plain and simple. you fell macho over the net, but i b et the only "fist fights" you have been in have been when you were 16 and the other guy was 12.

>> No.4431443

>>4431434

The thing is, people can make 30 round magazines from plastic with 3d printers. No one cares if those get banned - theyll make their own anyways.

Try to ban them.

>> No.4431445

>>4431434
>little cock argument

Everything you said was immediately invalidated. Also you don't have a constitutional right to swimming pools, but you do have one to bear arms, as well as a basic human right to self defense.

>> No.4431446

>>4431440
Sorry but I dont live in nigger land where shit like that happens.

>> No.4431449

>>4431423

NVA and Vietcong were well supplied by China and the USSR. The Taliban was well supplied by the US and China (especially with Stinger missiles). Small arms are simply not enough to fight even in an guerilla manner today.

Look at Iraq - the reason IEDs are the weapon of choice by Iraqi resistance is they had access to large quantities of explosives.

>> No.4431453

>>4431443

Silencers are already regulated and you can bet your ass the gubmint is going to care if you make one at home without filling out the proper paperwork.

There's no reason they can't do the same with magazines.

>> No.4431455

>>4431422
> I've seen how guns are just a shortcut for pussies who want to feel tough but are scared little faggots who won't fight without a gun.

> I've seen how longbows are just a shortcut for pussies who want to feel tough but are scared little faggots who won't fight without a longbow.

>I've seen how hand a a half swords are just a shortcut for pussies who want to feel tough but are scared little faggots who won't fight without a hand and a half sword.

> I've seen how daggers are just a shortcut for pussies who want to feel tough but are scared little faggots who won't fight without a dagger.

>UG LOOK HOW CLUB IS EASY FOR WIMPS WHO WANT FEEL LIKE UG BUT ARE LITTLE KID WHO WONT LIKE FIGHT WITH NO CLUB.

>> No.4431461

>>4431436

Exactly how many black men have assaulted you? For me it's zero, but then I don't seem to have the same repressed desire for black cock you do.

And a knife is fine for me in case there's ever real danger.

>> No.4431462

>>4431384
>guns are bad mkay
>feel like man with guns
>HURRR .22

>> No.4431456

>>4431446
>just because I don't need to defend myself means no one else should be able to

I will never understand gun control. It's not going to stop criminals from getting guns, but it will stop people who obey the law from being able to.

>> No.4431457

>>4431403
If you properly secured your guns in the 1st place that could never happen. Oh look, the small dick argument again. That is what happens I guess when you can't form a logical arguemnt and leave out the fact that guns are used far more in self-defense than in violent crime, and are involved in accidents. You may live in some gay ass suburban neighborhood where all you need to worry about is keeping your grass below 3 inches, but some of us have seen how fucked up people can be first hand. And we know that saying stop it or calling the police is not gonna help. Get the fuck out of here with that my kid is more important than yours, or my feelings are more important than yours bullshit.

>> No.4431459
File: 45 KB, 902x201, IVAN IRON FUCKING CLAD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431459

>>4431446

>> No.4431460

>>4431453

Some states allow their own citizens to make silencers and its perfectly legal and not even required to get permits and shit.

You were saying?

>> No.4431465

OP, why even include the gun in your picture? Are you so insecure about your manhood that you need to show anonymous internet users your gun in a thread about lunch? By the way, that sandwich looks like shit.

>> No.4431470

>>4431446
>complain about crime
>instead of moving to a better area, develop a paranoid radicalized view of reality, buy a fuck ton of guns, and lobby the gubmint to protect your hobby

Gun nut logic is very strange.

>> No.4431472

>>4431446
Afraid it happens everywhere, buddy. Nowhere has a 0% crime rate, just really low in some areas. May as well prepare for the inevitable so I don't let down my family when shit does happen. It's not like I hurt myself or anyone by properly and safely owning a firearm, I'm just out some hundreds of dollars at worst.

>> No.4431473

>>4431441

In that case I'll actually take a 2nd amendment argument from you seriously. Sounds like a pretty fucked up world to me, but at least you're consistent.

>> No.4431474

>>4431446

So just because you're "safe", that means other people shouldn't have the right to keep themselves safe? Sorry that not everyone lives in a gated white community and niggers exist.

>> No.4431477
File: 10 KB, 300x168, sako.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431477

>>4431453
>thinking people dont make suppressors without that shit

mfw

>> No.4431479

>>4431453
But how are they going to know? They can't do a search without probable cause... yet.

>> No.4431480

>>4431456

Yeah, it's not like countries with gun control have far less firearm deaths. Oh, wait . . .

>> No.4431483

>>4431480
And yet, higher violent crime rates. Stabbings through the roof. If only someone had a tool to trump a criminal with a knife without risking the lives of themselves or their family....

>> No.4431484

>>4431480

who cares

its legal to own here and I do

try and stop me lol

>> No.4431486

>>4431460

You'll have to forgive me because I don't spend much time on /k/ since the end of the Bat Guano days, but remind me of when the ATF stopped caring about homemade silencers? Because last I checked this was federal, not state law. Many states have even more restrictive rules but there is nowhere that you can legally slap a soda bottle on the end of your barrel without getting some kind of approval in advance.

>> No.4431489

>>4431461
then again, you prob live in a rich white gated community. try going out into the real world sometime, like Chicago. and its illegal to carry a knife above 2 inches bro, you're breaking the law. better disarm yourself. because tyrone sure will. you can just use your fists

>> No.4431490

>>4431480
>less firearms
>less deaths by said firearms because there are less of them

Shitty argument, circular reasoning. You would need to look at total murder rate, which is mostly lower in those countries as well, but the problem in the US isn't guns. It's inner-city gang violence, which accounts for the vast majority of murders in our country.

>> No.4431491

>>4431437
that's a nice shrine to our lord and savior frank zappa

>> No.4431492

>>4431470
Because all of us can afford to just up and move.

>> No.4431494

>>4431461

A gun is a good deal like a parachute; If you need one and don't have one, you won't have to worry about it, again.

The right to the arms of the day is synonymous with self-governance. The Spartans denied the Pilanians, the Selacians, the Aigitidans weapons. The Romans barred the Germanic tribes from owning swords. The British forbid the Scotts to train with blades and denied the Indians their rifles. In America the British attempted to disarm the colonials, who in turn disarmed slaves. Later, black codes prevented African Americans from owning guns. In the 1960s, while racial tensions spiked, panicking old white men scrambled to stop the Original Black Panthers Party from carrying rifles to innoculate themselves from incessant police bigotry. Martin Luther King Jr. himself was denied a concealed carry permit.

The control of weapons has never been, gun or blade, about 'safety,' it has always been about 'security,' and that security is always only for the few.

Also, that sandwich looks like butt.

>> No.4431495

>>4431483

Ummm except they don't. The EU and Canada both have lower violent crime rates than the US.

>> No.4431496

>>4431461

Repressed desire for black cock? What the fuck are you going on about? And what, you think that if something hasn't happened to you yet, it can't? What kind of retard logic is that?

>> No.4431497

>>4431480
What gun grabbers want is armed police on every street corner and no armed civilians. What gun grabbers get is armed police in every doughnut shop and absolutely no duty to protect civilians under any circumstance.

If police have to be armed, there exists a threat that requires the use of firearms to defeat them. If the threat exists, why should law abiding civilians be unable to protect themselves from it when police are able to?

>> No.4431498

>>4431470
I shouldn't have to move. I am going to defend my home with guns, and if you think that makes me a pussy who really gives a fuck?

>> No.4431499

>>4431491
Indeed it is.
Why are you not eating pancakes this morning?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzfzsKENCbU

>> No.4431501

>>4431484

Sure. In the US gun control will always be a pipe dream, and we'll get massacres like clockwork keep happening. I'm resigned that isn't changing - doesn't mean I'm not aware that gun owners are mostly pathetic faggots just because that's not going to change.

>> No.4431503

>>4431470
price of gun 100-500 dollars
price of moving 150,000+ dollars

liberal logic is retarded

>> No.4431504

>open thread expecting to see what people pack for lunch
>thread is about gun control
oh /ck/, what am i gonna do with you

>> No.4431507

>>4431495

>the EU

Not really. The UK actually has a higher violent crime rate. France has three times the rape and assault. Italy has more rape than the US has gun crime.

London was actually ranked as the most dangerous city in the EU, as a matter of fact.

>> No.4431509

>>4431486

Who cares about the ATF, these same states made it illegal and nullified federal control laws.

AGAIN

You were saying?

>> No.4431510

>>4431495
Except they... do. In fact the UK(highest tier gun grabbing nanny state) has a higher violent crime rate than the USA per capita.

>> No.4431511

>>4431425

Just like the pussies that have to have guns - they can't handle their own fights so they grab anything to help their sorry asses.

>> No.4431514

>>4431422
>Engage in "honorable" fist fight with some blaggard.
>You win! You're so manly!
>Blaggard, or Blaggard's friend, pulls a gun on you for beating him.
>Manly, honorable dead guy.

>> No.4431515

>>4431510

Your ass is not a source.

>> No.4431516

>>4431503
Well they are mostly faggots who live in the suburbs and spend 3000 on a laptop. They have that kind of money to spend.

>> No.4431517

>>4431480
but have higher murder overall.

you faggots only care about gun death it seems

5 get killed by guns and you shit bricks

100 get killed by anything else and you just let it slide.

>> No.4431519

>>4431483
>If only someone had a tool to trump a criminal with a knife without risking the lives of themselves or their family....
Like a baseball bat?

>> No.4431521

>>4431501

who cares boy you cant stop me and id love to see you try and take them from me

go back to dressing like cartoon girls and ill worry about killing people who enter my home without my consent lol

>> No.4431522

>>4431480
Facts would like to have a word with you

Gunfacts.info

>> No.4431523

>>4431511

You really are retarded, aren't you?

>> No.4431528

>>4431496

Sure. The fear of black men is a great reason to make high powered weapons designed only to kill many people freely available to the mentally ill. It's not like they ever go crazy and kill random people.

>> No.4431526

>>4431496
i think its funny how everything he said said has involved a penis so far.

Freudian slip?

>> No.4431529

>>4431519
A baseball bat doesn't trump a knife, let alone 1+ unarmed gentlemen on the PCP. If it takes a half dozen or more well-placed shots from police to drop them... a baseball bat won't make them flinch.

>> No.4431530

>>4431516
>Spend $3k on a laptop

Why do people do this?
I spend about $150 on a refurbished laptop, fix anything else, then have myself a quality computer.

Well, why do people do anything?!?

>> No.4431531

>>4431519

>implying it is ever advisable to enter melee combat with a knife-wielding opponent

Somebody's never been in a fight.

>> No.4431535

>>4431514
>pulls a gun on you for beating him
So you're saying gun owners are pathetic pussy faggots who pull their guns at anything they getbutthurt over? I'm glad we agree.

>> No.4431545

>>4431516

Wait, your problem with liberals is that they're not poor white trash like you? Sorry you fail at life, but how is that their problem?

>> No.4431537

>>4431530
That is their way of compensating for a small dick.

>> No.4431538

>>4431514

>>you sit at home rubbing your gun, stroking yourself about the fantasy that Jamal will break in your house and you'll shoot him
>>nothing ever happens
>>till your kid is playing with the gun and shoots his younger brother

>> No.4431539

>>4431519
Difficult to use indoors in small spaces. Also, you can grab a baseball bat by the business end, and it's no longer useful. With a home defense handgun, all you have to do is take one good step back, aim for center mass, and Mozambique Drill the fucker.

>> No.4431544

>>4431531
If a knife wielding opponent is within melee range, it's too late for guns. You're fucked.

>> No.4431546

>>4431535

sure why not gun owners are gaylords xD

still not going to stop me boy

>> No.4431547

>>4431538

Problem sounds like negligence, not the gun. See, that's the liberal problem: They want to blame anything but the human.

Man acts irresponsibly, they blame the object he was irresponsible with, not his negligence.

>> No.4431548

>>>/k/

Please go back to /k/ and stop shitposting here.

>> No.4431549

>>4431519
>not knowing anything about hand to hand combat

>> No.4431550

/k/ here time to fuck shit up

>> No.4431551

>>4431526

I guess. It seems like if anyone has the hots for penis it's liberals.

>you own a high stopping power assault weapon? You must have a small penis!

>you own a truck instead of an electric Prius? SMALL PENIS!

>you don't want the government helping you? COMPENSATION FOR SMALL PENIS LOLOL

>> No.4431552

>>4431544

That's... the point. The point is to stay OUT of melee range by using a ranged weapon instead of a melee weapon.

Stop being dumb.

>> No.4431553

>>4431547
But isn't it irresponsible to sell guns to irresponsible people?

Don't answer that, just stop posting.

>> No.4431554

>>4431538
>implying my child won't be taught from a young age how to properly handle a firearm

nice try, but I'm not that irresponsible.

>> No.4431555

>>4431509

I was saying the law doesn't have to be based on how easy it is to break. I can easily jaywalk and it's rarely enforced. You can attach a piece of string to your trigger and make an "automatic rifle". Doesn't matter, illegal is illegal. There is no magical relationship between 3D printers and the only amendment in the entire US constitution. The hype about homemade printed magazines is silly and nonsensical.

>> No.4431556

>>4431528
>high powered weapons

please define

>> No.4431557

>>4431528
No one ever said anything about giving them to the mentally ill. In fact, one of the main counter-proposals of the gun lobby is to make national mental health services and screening a primary concern.

Your straw man is showing.

>> No.4431558

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tueller_Drill
If the guy with a knife is within 20 feet of you, you don't have time to pull a gun on him before getting raped.

>> No.4431560

>>4431545
Wait, your problem with gun owners is that they don't live in gated communities like you and may need to defend themselves? Sorry you fail at life.

>> No.4431562

>>4431544
No? You still shoot them because guns are about the size of your hand. You might get some slight burns at that range, but they'll have the increased damage of a muzzle bursting their guts apart. A small price to pay to keep my family from being eaten by Jerome the hug-loving crackhead.

>> No.4431563

>>4431480
you mean like Mexico?

>> No.4431565

>>4431547

Jesus. No, there's plenty of blame for humans. You seem to think that there's not shitty humans out there, and that it should be simple for those humans to have the means to kill scores of people at will.

I've also noticed that most gun nuts are so stupid they don't seem to realize that their guns don't block bullets.

>> No.4431566

>>4431552
>The point is to stay OUT of melee range
If you're out of melee range, why do you need a gun?

>> No.4431569

>>4431553

>implying it is your position to judge the possible future responsibility of anyone
>Implying hypothetical future negligence or crime bears any merit

When you start deciding who has rights based on hypotheticals, you've officially gone full retard.

>> No.4431570

>>4431545
no, the problem is they paid for that thing with they're EBT cards (iv'e seen shit like this done)

the only people who are liberals are either
a. spoiled pricks who never saw the real world
b. poor leaches

which one are you now?

>> No.4431571

>>4431560

>>living in gated community instead of a trailer park
>>failing at life

great logic there

>> No.4431572

ITT:

>Every wanabe fit fag thinks it take 20 boolets to kill you because thats what its like in cod

>Knives are unbeatable in close range because reasons that are never specified

>guns are for pussy men because they assume that gun owners are weak

I hope all of you get raped with a spiked dildo.

>> No.4431573

>>4431555

Sure just ban it, thatll stop it. Not.

>> No.4431575

>>4431544
So take one big step backwards.

Congratulations! You are now out of knife range, and have plenty of room to pull the ol' Djibouti Shooty!

>> No.4431576

>>4431566
Because they want to enter melee range to stabs you. You can't just run away and leave your family to get stabbed in your place. Also in many places the law says you don't have to run away because it's wrong. If someone's doing bad things, good guys should stop them. Stopping bad guys takes guns in a majority of cases. Not necessarily killing with it, but having it is necessity.

>> No.4431577
File: 36 KB, 640x360, rape-is-oK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431577

>>4431558
its okay, rape only lasts about 30 secs anyway

>> No.4431578

>>4431565
A plate carrier and AR500 plates do though.

>> No.4431583

>>4431528

It's not like someone could pass a background check and then go on a murder spree, right? Face it, anyone can pass a background check, acquire a vz 58 or something similar, and then go fuck shit up.

>> No.4431585

>>4431566
because your life is threatened

>> No.4431586

>>4431558
Whats your point?

>> No.4431579

>>4431555
The point of having a law against "high capacity" magazines is so that criminals wont be able to have them. If criminals can just print or make them in their garage though, what is the point of the law? Such a law would literally only affect people who wouldn't use the magazines for evil.

>> No.4431580

>>4431562
>You still shoot them
And he stabs you. The fact you shot him will be small consolation when you're dead.

>> No.4431581

>>4431555

how is it nonsensical libturd

>> No.4431582

>>4431566

To stop him from coming INTO melee range. Stop being dumb, dummy.

>> No.4431587

>>4431575
>So take one big step backwards.
And he takes one big step forwards. You're still fucked.

>> No.4431588

>>4431571
Implying I do not live on a reservations full of tweakers and sex offenders.

>> No.4431589

>>4431580

Nigger what.

How do you think he'll stab me when I just put at least 2 in his fucking center mass.

>> No.4431591

>>4431580
If I have to kill a guy who's going to stab me while being unarmed anyway, I'm glad to put him down before he kills again. It's not like 90% of gunshot wounds are treatable in the hospital these days (hint: they are). I don't care if I have to die to stop a criminal from getting to my family or anyone I care about or even a stranger I may have never met before. Why would you let him stab you without recourse and continue on?

>> No.4431593

>>4431565
you're right. lets disarm the police too, it will save money.

>> No.4431595

>>4431565

>implying that some people are shitty, therefor everyone should be treated like they, too, are shitty

Jesus christ, I remember thinking that punishing the whole class because the teacher didn't know who did something was retarded in fucking PRESCHOOL, and people are still trying to do it as adults.

>> No.4431596

>>4431580

And guns should be outlawd because someone was stabbed once

LOL

>> No.4431597

>>4431586
The point is, "guns will protect me from people with knives" is bullshit.

>> No.4431598
File: 65 KB, 398x599, 398px-Vietcong1968.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431598

>>4431565
which is why you shoot them first.

also, fun story

>yfw i tought my 14 year old cousin how to take apart an ar15 and the BCG, an sks, and a mosin nagant.

i can sense your asshurt already
mfw

>> No.4431599

>>4431576
>You can't just run away and leave your family to get stabbed in your place

wan't there an anti-funner that did just that?

>> No.4431600

>>4431553
Which is why most pro-gunners argue that the prime concern should be national mental health services.

>> No.4431601

>>4431597

But they do chuckle fuck.

>> No.4431602

>>4431579

And if you ban CP people will still make CP. So it might as well be legal, right?

You seem not to grasp what laws are for.

>> No.4431605

>>4431572
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2d8_1367104934
this is the knife argument

>> No.4431606

>>4431575
unless he's faster than you.

inb4 black people aren't great runners

>> No.4431611

>>4431602

You stupid nigger strawman.

There is no point to the law because those who it is targeted at will not follow it.

>> No.4431607

>>4431589
Sorry, I didn't know you were a lightning fast ninja.

>> No.4431609
File: 729 KB, 2338x1700, k fort 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431609

Heh.
Heheheheh.
You guys are cute.

>> No.4431612

>>4431601
Only in your armchair warrior fantasies.

>> No.4431613

>>4431566
because melee range is within 15 feet. how long does it take to close that gap?

>> No.4431614

>>4431607

You know practice makes perfect.

Maybe one day you'll be as good as me.

>> No.4431615

>>4431599
I don't know. All I know is that if guns are banned or something, majority of self-respecting family-protecting Americans will become outlaws and use them for self-defense anyway. It's an inalienable Constitutionally protected right and it's the best answer to the fucked up world we live in. Deal with it.

>> No.4431616

>>4431598

I don't care if you or your cousin jack off over guns. I do think it's ridiculous you assume you'd get the drop on a deranged fuckup who's decided to take a bunch of people out.

Colorado has very gun friendly laws. Why didn't anyone in Aurora shoot first if that's the way we protect ourselves?

>> No.4431617

>>4431611

Oh, you said strawman! I can see I'm in the presence of an expert.

>> No.4431618

>>4431616
Gun-free zones protect criminals from law-abiding citizens, of course. The correct answer: Disobey all gun laws. Rely on your own moral compass and not fear of bacon.

>> No.4431620

>>4431602

You seem to not grasp the effects of laws.

In your example, the law punishes those who break it. In the magazine example, the law punishes those who break it while simultaneously putting law abiding citizens at a disadvantage.

While it does punish the criminal for using a larger magazine, it also ensures that criminals willing to break the law (IE, All criminals) are now thoroughly outgunning law abiding citizens whom they intend to victimize. It's a self defeating proposition; adding a charge while making it easier to commit crime.

>> No.4431621

>>4431602
CP is only designed to hurt children

Firearms have other uses, like defending property. Also bills should be proven effective first before becoming law, and not rely on the classic "burden of proof" fallacy "you don't need one prove me wrong"

>> No.4431622
File: 176 KB, 717x960, 602565_348022005277351_2029096684_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431622

>>4431612

Sorry I cant hear you over the sound of how wrong you are.

>> No.4431624

>>4431576

And this shows the basic reason for pro-gun stupidity - it's all a vigilante fantasy, where instead of being a shitty best buy clerk they're a hero waiting to be in their heads.

>> No.4431626

I hope more states pass laws like Colorado did just a few weeks ago. Colorado passed a law saying you cant have more than 15 round magazines and that people have to get background checks for all gun purchases and they have to pay for them instead of making the government pay for it.
New York earlier this year passed a law stating that you can only have 7 round magazines.

Colorado is also talking about requiring gun owners to have insurance and also possible restrictions on how much ammo you can buy at a time.

I am glad more states are enacting gun control and I hope more will in the future. We just need to go at it slowly and get a few laws on the books each time.

>> No.4431629

>>4431614
>You know practice makes perfect.
The same goes for the mugger.

>> No.4431630
File: 766 KB, 1095x795, get zerged son.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431630

whats going on in this thread?

>> No.4431631

>>4431579

Since people can kill people even though it's illegal, we shouldn't bother having laws against murder. It just punishes people who kill in self-defense.

>> No.4431633

>>4431612
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=police+shoot+man+with+knife

>> No.4431634

>>4431587
So keep taking steps backwards, pulling the trigger the entire time. Jesus, have you no sense of contextual implication? Did you seriously think I meant take a step backwards, and then wait patiently for him to step towards you? Firing retreat, man. Firing retreat.

>> No.4431635

>>4431459

This.

>> No.4431636

>>4431626
Tryanny is a slow road as they say. It encroaches inch by inch.

>> No.4431637

>>4431616
Because concealed carry is banned in most theaters, fucktard.

>> No.4431638

>>4431622
>my circlejerk supports me so there
Good for you. Enjoy your delusions.

>> No.4431639

>>4431624
And yet it's IN their heads. There's not a moment where they aren't aware of their own firearm and thus more HESITANT to pull it out. It has to be for good, road rage? Psh, just some guy who had a bad day. If he was a bad guy though, I woulda had to cap his ass.

If someone is a good person, they should be prepared to protect people around them. Whether it will ever happen is not the issue, all it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing.

To castrate good people and disallowing them to prevent evil acts is far more evil than obsessing over whether you'll be a hero someday.

>> No.4431641

>>4431626
Those laws will do nothing and the supporters know it.

Most guns are illegally obtained anyway and magazine restrictions just won't be followed. Neither will the requirement for insurance.

I don't see why that's so hard to understand.

All those laws do is hurt law abiding owners.

>> No.4431642

>>4431583

HERP DERP THE LAW MIGHT POSSIBLY NOT CATCH EVERYTHING SO DON'T MAKE ONE. IT ONLY WILL PREVENT 90% OF GUN MASSACRES SO LIBRULS R DUMB!

Basic gist of your argument I guess? Or is there a finer point I'm missing?

>> No.4431643

I didn't know /ck/ was full of such libtards and soccer moms.

>> No.4431644

>>4431616
the theater was a gun free zone? how did holmes get a gun in there?

also, see>>4431442

>> No.4431645

>>4431621

Actually no, it's designed to titillate perverts. Whereas in the context of guns as protection against bad people, guns are designed solely for the purpose of shooting people.

High cap mags went way up in price during the last ban, which is a pretty effective testament to the effectiveness of the ban. Saying the ban was useless because it didn't make millions of pieces of metal magically disappear overnight is stupid. The ban worked.

>> No.4431646
File: 329 KB, 2338x1700, k fort 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431646

>>4431630
Buncha slack jawed faggots running amuck.

>> No.4431647

>>4431631
...but it doesn't.

>> No.4431648
File: 93 KB, 1210x840, 1239976877246.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431648

i just don't understand the obsession of relating a gun to a dick for compensation in every anti gun argument its just shits up the hole argument and makes it moot for the lack of intelligent debate

pic related my compensation gun

>> No.4431649

>>4431636
>Not wanting my kids to be slaughtered while they are at school by a guy who has a 100 round magazine
>tyranny

I just wish they would release the photos of the scene that day and get this gun control issue over with.

>> No.4431650

>>4431348
Hell, I've used a gun as a bottle opener, dog call, and a fucking key.

>> No.4431654
File: 49 KB, 700x576, The Scarecrow 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431654

>>4431624
http://www.wral.com/woman-shoots-two-intruders-at-elm-city-home/12256152/

strawmen, strawmen errywhere

>> No.4431655

>>4431642
>prevent 90%

>HUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

>> No.4431656

>>4431634
So you take a step backwards and he's just standing there waiting patiently for you to kill him? He was rushing at you and stabbing you a second ago but now he's just standing there? And you can walk backwards faster than he can move forwards?

>> No.4431657

>>4431641
Oh they do more than hurt law abiding owners, they turn law abiding owners into criminal owners because fuck giving up MY GUNS. No, once you've passed that line into criminality, you've got even less reason to comply with police. To fit into society determined to hunt you for your supposed (God Given Rights)crimes.

Vigilantes are vastly preferable to ignorant cowards incapable of seeing the reality in which they live and safely preparing for the worst.

>> No.4431658

>>4431643
I didnt know /ck/ was full of retarded gun nuts from /k/

>> No.4431659

>>4431650
but then you do struggle to achieve full tumescence.

>> No.4431660

>>4431593

Doesn't lead from what I posted at all, but thanks for playing!

>>don't allow the mentally ill to easily become heavily armed
>>you want to disarm the police

I guess the only logical way your argument follows is you think the police are all mentally ill.

>> No.4431661
File: 523 KB, 960x960, 1366241384967.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431661

>>4431649

>> No.4431663

>>4431649
But schools are gun free zones, how could someone every bring a gun in there?

>> No.4431664
File: 40 KB, 529x399, columbine shooting.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431664

>>4431645
>CP doesn't hurt kids
go back to /b/

>The ban worked.
that's great, but how did it help?

>> No.4431666

>>4431649
MUH CHILLENS!

>> No.4431668

>>4431494

Don't forget that in Feudal Japan the Samurai were the only people who could own swords. Back then, Samurai could also decapitate Peasants for looking at them the wrong way. Coincidence? I think not.

>> No.4431669
File: 47 KB, 500x375, fat-man-little-gun-500x375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431669

>>4431654
>BUT MUH FANTASIES

For every perfect home invasion fantasy story, there are thousands of tragic and embarrassing cases where a dude accidentally shot his dick off because he was playing with his gun while drunk.

>> No.4431670

>>4431595

Yes, not letting people have arsenals is treating them shitty.

Downside - people have to wait a few days for their guns
Upside - vast reduction in gun murders

Yeah, obviously not worth it

>> No.4431672

>>4431649

>muh feels

You are more likely to be hit by lightning, eaten by a shark, mauled by a bear, or struck by falling debris than you are to be shot in a mass shooting. Cry harder.

You are building a world for your child so safe that it will not be worth living in. Cameras on every street corner, insurance to take a shit, medication to cover the effects of the other medications.

If you truly do have children, I feel sorry for them. You're raising them to be pussies.

>> No.4431674

>>4431661
>implying that happened because guns were banned at the moment
This is what gun tards actually believe.

>> No.4431676

>>4431602
The difference is in the desired effects of the laws. The purpose of limiting magazines is so people who want to kill other people ( a rather small minority) will have a harder time. The problem is that making magazines is so easy to do at home that the law literally only hurts those who are not going to kill other people with the magazines.

Now, CP is different because the intended effects of the law are to prevent EVERYONE from making or watching it and to have a way of jailing people who hurt small children. While the law is not 100% effective, it does keep CP out of legitimate stores and it has been used to jail child predators.

>> No.4431677

>>4431674

That's not the point fuck head

>> No.4431678

>>4431658
I'm not a 'gun nut'. I'm an average person who happens to own firearms. Is a person who owns a car a "car nut"?

>> No.4431679

>>4431569
>implying it is your position to judge the possible future responsibility of anyone
No, it's not mine. It's the government's.

>Implying hypothetical future negligence or crime bears any merit

Reducing future crimes is the number one priority of law enforcement.

>> No.4431682

>>4431660
>Guns don't stop knives
>cops do it erryday

(oh shit, I know, I'll call him out and say he's for the mentally ill getting guns)

do you retards not know there's already laws on the books for this?

>> No.4431683

>>4431676
So what you're saying is that the laws aren't going far enough?

>> No.4431684

>>4431677
The point is that guns don't protect people? Yeah, I know.

>> No.4431680
File: 151 KB, 675x264, 1367148792860.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431680

>>4431674
Well, some people are working towards that.

>> No.4431681

>>4431637

Except it's not in Colorado - pretty much just federal buildings prohibit concealed carry.

And why wasn't anyone open carrying, fucko? Why didn't one of the good guys blow him away first, if guns are so protective?

>> No.4431685

>>4431664

It didn't have time to help, because it takes time to get all that legacy product into the hands of wealthy collectors. In addition, 10 rounds is still too much.

>> No.4431686
File: 799 KB, 320x240, 1354763266122.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431686

>>4431679

Get the fuck out of here you statist pig.

>> No.4431687

>>4431670

>wait a few days

Backpedal harder. Background checks are instant and already done on all purchases, even those from gun shows. I know you wouldn't actually KNOW what the law is, but thats the law already.

There is only one kind of transaction involving a gun that is not closely monitored: Person-to-person transaction. One person selling private property to another, because that falls under the jurisdiction of property rights.

>> No.4431688

>>4431669
Fortunately, it's his God given right to shoot his dick off from being a drunken redneck. For every dumbfuck who shoots his dick off, there's 200 million dumbfucks who don't.

>>4431679
Protecting citizens is not a court-upheld priority, unfortunately.

>> No.4431690

>>4431672
>You're raising them to be pussies.

You mean for my son to be considered a real man he has to own a gun? That he will be a pussy because he wont have a gun?

This type of attitude really makes me fear for my kids(yes I do have 2 of them). I really hope this gun shit is taken care of before they get into the school system.

>> No.4431691

>>4431606
Fighting retreat. Back up AND shoot. If it's a home invasion, you should already have your gun up and ready to fire. The second you see your target make any kind of move in your direction, squeeze the trigger until they're down. It's really that easy.

>> No.4431692

>>4431680
Some people are working towards making the world safer? How horrible.

>> No.4431694

>>4431605
>cops carrying drop leg/retention strap holsters

See how well your fat ass fares against someone CC/OCing with a proper holster.

>> No.4431695

>>4431649
>thinking 100 is worse than 10, 10 rounders
>you're funny

>> No.4431697

>>4431690
A real man will accept responsibility to survive and ensure his family survives in reality. Reality has niggers and crackheads and white trash and random acts of violence and terrorists.

If you're not teaching your child to come to terms with these evils and ignore them while you pray the police deign to show up at all.... you're irresponsible.

>> No.4431700

>>4431679

>number one priority

No, it is not. The investigation of crime and the apprehension of criminals is the number one priority of law enforcement. They have no legal obligation to prevent crime, only enforce laws once crime is committed.

>> No.4431702

>>4431605
Except no one is going to have their weapon holstered during a home invasion. The draw time is therefore eliminated. The second the gun is on your person, it should be up and ready to fire.

>> No.4431703

>>4431692
You're right. People never killed each other before the invention of the gun. Don't know why I didn't see that before.

>> No.4431704

>>4431691
The hypothetical situation was with the attacker in melee range. Read the thread. The first sentence was, if the attacker is in melee range, you're fucked.

>> No.4431705
File: 50 KB, 539x480, 1366214191510.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431705

HUEHUEHUE
m-muh chilluhns

>> No.4431706

>>4431690
I hope you kid gets ran over by a car. So then you can lead a campaign to ban cars.

>> No.4431707

>>4431678
Cars require drivers license to operate. They also require registration and insurance to be able to operate in society.

A car is not a gun.

>> No.4431708
File: 2.29 MB, 500x281, 1360573029631.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431708

>>4431694

> ⑨mm

GET THE FUCK OUT GUYS

RETREAT /k/ RETREAT!!!!

>> No.4431709
File: 218 KB, 600x400, 130207-blue-truck-lapd-hmed-5p.photoblog600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431709

>>4431669
No, that's not fantasy. That story actually happened

>for every defense someone got hurt by their own gun
[citation needed]

and even if so, why shouldn't someone be able to defend their home just because some hillbilly misfired his .22 once? I can make the same argument for fucking cops (pic related)

>> No.4431710

>>4431707
And yet they don't require any of those restrictions on personal property. Enjoy your unregistered home-defense vehicle in peace.

>> No.4431711

>>4431707
A car is also not a right.

...and this is the last I will say on this topic, I love /k/ and /ck/, but the two need to stay separate.

>> No.4431712

>>4431697
That is implying I live in a area infested with niggers and crackheads. I live in a really safe neighborhood where the people dont need guns to feel safe.
Sorry your police force is shitty, sorry you live in a nigger crackhead infested area.

>> No.4431713
File: 112 KB, 550x358, obama-drone-strike-children-dead.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431713

WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?

>> No.4431715

>>4431687

The jurisdiction of property rights? That's not a thing, idiot. I know it sounds like one, but laws define property rights, and jurisdiction is the area of enforcement of law.

And background checks are not necessary at gun shows, maybe you want to actually read the law. Firearms dealers are required to perform them, sellers at gun shows are not classified as such.

>> No.4431716

>>4431607
If it's a home invasion, your gun is already up in firing position.

Here: take a test. Turn your phone onto camera mode, stand within 5 feet of a person, point it at them, and ask them to touch you before you can click the shutter.

>> No.4431717

>>4431703
You're right. Guns protect everyone and there have been no mass shootings or any sort of violent crimes, ever, because guns prevented them all.

>> No.4431718

>>4431690

>raise children to be afraid of inanimate objects
>raise children to be terrified of other humans
>healthy

Its not about owning guns. Its about not being so fucking scared that you want to dictate how others live their lives.

>> No.4431726

>>4431717
You realize how many mass shootings are stopped because of someone with a gun, right?
Of course you don't, because the media doesn't report those stories. Stay brainwashed, kid.

>> No.4431727

>>4431716
Read the thread. The guy is a foot away from you.

>> No.4431719

>>4431712
Niggers and crackheads can steal and drive vehicles. How many minutes away from the nearest urban city center do you live? Are you really SURE they can't drive into your neighborhood?

>> No.4431722

>>4431697
>doesn't keep poison powder cannon fully loaded to defend against attack by the slime monster
>doesn't keep a cross made of garlic to defend against dracula
>doesn't build a moat full of alligators around child's play pen to defend against mongol hordes
>doesn't mine the front lawn to defend against Iranian human wave tactics
>doesn't force baby to sleep with gas mask to defend against scud missile attack
>doesn't deny babby his vaccines because jennifer love hewitt said it would be the autism

Why so selective with your threat responses? Don't you love your family?

>> No.4431723
File: 20 KB, 403x403, 20885_10151555196784828_182171664_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431723

>>4431690
you want your son to be a "man" by learning to accept that tryone is entitled to everything you have and you should feel bad for what white people did to them 200 years go.

you want him to be a man and take his car to the mechanic instead of having basic knowledge of an automobile.

you want your son to be a "man" and not know to respect a machine.

>> No.4431724

>>4431697
Anon, you almost gave me a boner. Very well said.
10/10 would operate with

>> No.4431725
File: 176 KB, 960x642, god bless america.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431725

>>4431690
its not about owning a gun, its about the irrational fear that some people have of them.

>> No.4431728

>>4431683
No, im saying that there is no point in making murder double illegal. People will get guns regardless of any laws, so forcing non-criminals to disarm is just ridiculous. You seem to be under the impression that laws actually fix problems. They don't. Murder is illegal, but we still have murders. That's because the law doesn't actually prevent murders, it only punishes them after the fact.

>> No.4431731

>>4431717
Your right, removing the balance of force between law abiding citizens and criminals is a good idea!

>> No.4431733

>>4431685
>It didn't have time to help
10 years

>10 rounds is still too much.
because 1 bullet can't kill on it's own? Please

>but hurr durr mass murderings every few years!
then you just see more fertilizer or pressure cookers instead.

>> No.4431734

>>4431718
>has to own a gun to not be scared of other humans
>calls others terrified of other humans
Cool story, bro.

>> No.4431735

>>4431290
>/po/
/k/

At least get it right.

>> No.4431736

>>4431717

My god, its almost like we have to be adults and accept that some people are assholes and some aren't! Its almost as if we should just step the fuck off and let people live their own lives!

>> No.4431737

>>4431712
so you admit to being a sheltered bitch?

>> No.4431738

>>4431717
People can and have gone on sprees without firearms. In fact, I believe the worse one occurred with an improvised bomb. Bombs were illegal. Didn't seem to help.

>> No.4431739

>>4431669
natural selection at its finest

>> No.4431740

>>4431717
The worst school massacre in US history was performed with firebombs and TNT, actually. 1929.

>>4431722
You don't have a chemical-hazard drill in your house? Staplegun, duct tape, plastic sheeting for windows and doors? Weeks worth of food in case you're trapped in a blizzard or tornado or hurricane or something? Seriously, do you even prep?

In all seriousness, reality is not a pretty place. Don't take your happy life for granted just because shit hasn't happened to you het. Shit happens.

>> No.4431741

>>4431292
exceptions =/= rule

>> No.4431742

>>4431717
The thing that can stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun. The arguement ends there.

>> No.4431744

>>4431587
so your logic is to not attempt to defend yourself at all?

>> No.4431748

>>4431723

Ah gun nuts - try all you like, but your arguments always get to "OMG NIGGAS IS GONNA RAPE MES" way too quick

>> No.4431749

>>4431728
So what you want to get rid of laws against murder because they don't stop all murder?

You need to work on your analogies none of them make sense.

>> No.4431750

>>4431722

>implying home invasion or mugging are outlandish scenarios

Stop being silly.

>> No.4431751

>>4431731
You're right, giving any lunatic and criminal off the street free access to guns is a good idea!

>> No.4431752

>>4431713
this
no one gives a shit when it happens there but it comes here and OHH NOES just like the Boston bombings other happened that same over there but meh not us who cares


you people make me fucking sick

>> No.4431754

>>4431748
It's a valid argument though, people get raped. Have you cured the epidemic of violence in the USA? Well.... better safe than sorry. Why are you always so sorry?

>> No.4431755

>>4431719
Sorry but there hasnt been a murder, breakin, or robbery in my neighborhood in the longest time, I cant remember the last time that happened. I do live pretty close to the city though but I dont ever see niggers or crackheads driving around.
Sounds like just another made up scenario you fools like to spout on about. Like the fema helicopters are coming to get you or the 100 serial killers breaking into your house. Just made up shit scenarios that will not happen.

>> No.4431756

>>4431742
Sure, but I'd rather have fewer bad persons with guns to start with.

>> No.4431757

>>4431726

How many? Not in your imagination or hypotheticals, but how many mass shootings have been stopped by gun owners?

The answer is 0.

>> No.4431759
File: 74 KB, 640x360, Smitty Werbenjagermanjensen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431759

>>4431738
>>4431733

>> No.4431760

>>4431626
Yup. And all this is DEFINITELY going to stop Jamal and Tyrone from buying their ammo from their buddy down the block who is part of a black-market network.

>> No.4431762

>>4431734

Actually, I don't own a gun. I'm just not a faggot who thinks I have the right to dictate whether others can.

>> No.4431763
File: 102 KB, 400x398, 34390737.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431763

>>4431740
>food as a top priority rather than drinking water

You preppers amuse the shit out of me. Admit it, you pray for SHTF because you're hoping bitches will be all over your dick when you're the only guy on the street with a basement full of MREs.

>> No.4431764

>>4431713
America is too busy empowering our government to care. Sad fact that many see this as a good thing and are able to vote. Luckily they are the minority for now.

To bad that ban on high capacity soda drinks didn't get passed /ck/. Now the kids will be fat.

>> No.4431766

>>4431733

Look at the gifford's shooting - less rounds means quicker reload, which is when the crazy got taken down by unarmed people.

>> No.4431767

>>4431748
as if gungrabbers dont get to penis compensating in the first few posts.

>> No.4431768

>>4431742
Another thing that can stop a bad person with a gun is not giving the bad person a gun in the first place.

>> No.4431769
File: 953 KB, 210x140, 1300410956880.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431769

QUICK, SOMEONE HARNESS AND WEAPONIZE ALL THIS BUTTDEVESTATION!

>> No.4431772

>>4431631
Self defence is a recognized justification in court, you twat.

>> No.4431773

>>4431757
there was that Oregon mall shooting where some guy who was cc drew on him. guy ran away and killed himself or something

>> No.4431775

>>4431748
here you go with more rape stuff.

you really are just one big Freudian slip.

>> No.4431776

>>4431751

>implying we don's already have background checks

Strawman harder.

>> No.4431778

>>4431755
Nobody's going to force you to go out and buy a gun, unless you're in that.... city in Alabama? Louisiana? There's a mandatory gun ownership law in place that I'm pretty sure has never been enforced.... their crime rate dropped like 99% when it went into effect. JUST SAYING.

But no, there's absolutely no reason to disarm people when bad guys exist. They may not be at your door, but why wouldn't you be prepared for that very remote possibility anyway? Are you so blase about life that you won't prepare for ANYTHING going wrong? Even the slightest chance?

It's not even about self defense on the whole, but on that one singular incredibly valid issue... what's your problem with self-defense? Shouldn't that be a choice someone makes for their own household? What's the alternative if defending yourself ceases to exist?

>> No.4431779

>>4431757
You must not have heard of the one just a few months ago where an off duty cop shot a theater shooter who opened fire on the crowd?

>> No.4431780

>>4431776
>implying all gun sales require a background check
Retard harder.

>> No.4431781

>>4431749
No, I don't want to get rid of murder laws. Murderers should be punished, possibly even executed. But I am not so naive to think that a law against murder will prevent anyone from trying to kill me. The difference between murder laws and gun laws is that gun laws hurt good people too. They prevent people from defending themselves while the bad guys just get guns through illegal means. Murder laws at least have exceptions for non-criminals, so that self-defense isn't outlawed.

>> No.4431784

>>4431764
>high capacity soda drinks didn't get passed
lol it did just in jew york

>> No.4431785

>>4431779
That's interesting. How many did the shooter kill?

>> No.4431792

A 'gun nut' sees a gun and thinks: "Man, that would be fun to take to the range. Maybe I could put a scope or a foregrip on it?"

A progressive sees a gun and immediately starts thinking about dicks and mass murder.

You tell me who's the fucked up one.

>> No.4431793

>>4431766
>six dead, thirteen other people were wounded

that's equal to 2 10 round magazines. still not seeing how banning zomg assault clips! would have made a difference.

>> No.4431794

>>4431780
I'm pretty sure most states have some sort of check and waiting period on the weapons used in 99% of all crimes: handguns.

>> No.4431786

>>4431764
I'm sorry /ck/

>> No.4431787

>>4431757
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=shooting+stopped+by+CCW
:-)

>> No.4431789

>>4431763
actually no, the last thing you want is people knowing you have supplies.

>> No.4431790

>>4431757
A handful? Media just doesn't report them.

>> No.4431791

>>4431754

I'm not. Strangely enough, even living in bad neighborhoods, I've never been mugged, robbed, or raped, And what's really impossible is I don't own a gun either.

Of course I don't sit at home hoping that'll happen so I can be a good guy and escape my boring life, so maybe that's it.

>> No.4431795

>>4431779
>shooting stopped by a cop
I see.

>> No.4431796
File: 297 KB, 962x722, 1362716501054.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431796

Heres my lunch, what do you think /ck/ ?

>> No.4431810

>>4431794
>what are gun shows
Resale of guns is legal and doesn't require any sort of background check.

>> No.4431797

>>4431785
Not a single person

>> No.4431798

>>4431712
>because I live in a safe(r) neighborhood you shouldn't be able to defend yourself

Quit thinking with your uterus you cunt

>> No.4431799

>>4431784
no it didn't you fag, it got overturned

>> No.4431803

>>4431787
And just in case you're too lazy to look, here's an excerpt: http://blog.uritraining.com/?p=88
:-)

>> No.4431804

>>4431656
Which is why, fucktard, you keep pulling the trigger as you retreat.

Here: this is the "camera test". Take your camera phone, point it at a friend, stand within 5 feet of them, and ask them to try to touch you before you can click the shutter. If you click the button the instant you see them move while stepping backwards to open the distance, there is no chance in hell they will be able to touch you first.

>> No.4431805
File: 57 KB, 283x203, 1347464679384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431805

>>4431780
All gun sales require an initial background check. There is no way around it legally. Maybe get your facts straight gun grabber.

>> No.4431806

>>4431778

You mean a homogenous gated community that created a law to advertise what was already in effect? They could have just printed fliers saying "we're all armed", but the law was a better way to masturbate.

>> No.4431807

>>4431795
Off-duty= civiallian

>> No.4431808

>>4431766
>this is the only shooting where this has happened.

james holmes ar jammed 20 rounds in, why did no one tackle him? he switched to a shotgun with 8 rounds. why did no one attack him? they had 3 chances?

>> No.4431809

>>4431768
Yeah, because the criminal is such a good guy that he won't find another way to get one.

>> No.4431811

>>4431781
gun laws don't hurt good people, they hurt people who spend their days planning and fantasizing about the day someone tries something and they'll FINALLY get to shoot a man.

People who harp on about self-defense are just in love with a fantasy of killing.

>> No.4431813

>>4431791
does your ass stay out past 12am?

>> No.4431815

>>4431787
>http://lmgtfy.com/?q=shooting+stopped+by+CCW

Might want to try that yourself. One possible - the Oregon shooter who killed himself (like most shooting crazies do), but the guy with a gun claims it was cause of him. Funny how he didn't stop him even then.

>> No.4431816

>>4431795
>off duty
>ccw
Could have been anyone, just happened to be an off duty cop. Don't know what you're grasping at.

>> No.4431817

>>4431775
>all that argument
Oh wait, there isn't one.

>> No.4431818

>>4431780

They do. Gun shows and gun shops. The only ones that don't are private citizens selling to other private citizens, because property right and privacy law supercedes. Private citizens do not have the right to run background checks on other private citizens,

>> No.4431819

>>4431804
>your argument is invalid because in a completely different scenario that isn't being discussed at the moment I could shoot him
Sure thing, bro.

>> No.4431820

>>4431815
Look again, friend.
:-)

>> No.4431823

>>4431810
You've never been to a gun show, have you? 90% of all transactions in a gun show require a background check, 100% require ID.

>> No.4431825

>>4431805

Gun show and private sale loopholes, you fucking idiot. Go read the law if you're actually literate.

>> No.4431828

>>4431805
>what are resales

>> No.4431829

>>4431810

Only if it is between one private citizen and another. Dealers, vendors, and booth owners have to run them.

Private citizens aren't legally allowed to run background checks because of privacy laws. Unless you want to throw those out, too.

>> No.4431830

>>4431795
>off duty cop using ccw

fix'd

>> No.4431827

>>4431669
>Implying someone that stupid being unable to breed is anything but good

>> No.4431831

>>4431818

You keep using the word property right. It doesn't mean what you think it does.

>> No.4431833

>>4431817
there actually is, you keep saying we're the ones going crazy over penis.

every counter you have has come down to being scared of rape, or having a small dick.

i think you're crying out for help. please see a doctor about your feelings.

>> No.4431834

>>4431791
Shit, I know people that get mugged, jumped by gangs, no rape victims from what I can tell.... I've personally been held up at gunpoint, nearly hit by stray gunfire while in a friend's home as a kid.... probably other things.

Now, my parents didn't believe in guns. Nobody ever broke into our house(we were pretty poor, bad choice anyway). Cars were stolen multiple times, people vandalized neighbors houses and such.

I ain't even mad. I carry a modest firearm with me, legally, and I haven't had any problems since I moved the hell out of crack alley. I don't want to come across any problems, but I'm sure as hell not ignoring their existance. The gun doesn't make me safer necessarily, but it gives me a MORE even standing on people who may wish me harm. No matter how much you want to, you're never going to be at an advantage against a criminal aggressor. Equal terms is.... well, it's wishful thinking.

>>4431810
What two people do in their own homes and/or convention centers is not my business. I am not Big Brother, it's their responsibility to be responsible gun owners and salesmen. They probly wouldn't show up in the shitty database anyway.

>> No.4431835

>>4431810
it does bro in some states but if you knew your neighbor for years would you bother paying to have to sell or gift it

>> No.4431836

>>4431818
>The only ones that don't are private citizens selling to other private citizens
Well there you go.

>> No.4431837

Its ok guys we will just pass more and more gun control laws just like we did in Colorado and New York, the supreme court has already ruled that states have the right to regulate firearms and you damn well know this.

What we really need to do is tax your ammo and drive up the prices even more. I know you guys are hurting now for ammo and prices have gone up. I hope those prices stay up.

>> No.4431838
File: 10 KB, 267x200, 3107572+_83ee93737dfa97fba1cb0a4994f69d08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431838

>>4431825
>everyonelookandlaughatthisretard.jpg

>> No.4431839

>>4431811
So your belief is that wanting to own a gun makes someone a bad person. Murder is illegal because when I murder someone I am necessarily hurting them. Tell me, who am I necessarily hurting by owning guns?

>> No.4431840

>>4431707
Not on private property, they don't.

>> No.4431844

>>4431825
>Gun show loopholes
>This is fact because TV says so

How about a proper fucking citation instead?

>> No.4431849

>>4431836

>better throw out the right to privacy and property while we're at it

Liberals, ladies and gentlemen.

>> No.4431850

>>4431834
>What two people do in their own homes and/or convention centers is not my business. I am not Big Brother, it's their responsibility to be responsible gun owners and salesmen.
So what are you saying, are there background checks or aren't there? Can they be circumvented or can't they?

>> No.4431852

ITT: People who've never even held a gun argue about how to buy guns with people who actually have bought guns

>> No.4431853

>>4431837
And the senate will keep on and keep on shutting thay shit down. Face it faggot, our guns are not going anywhere.

>> No.4431855
File: 1.89 MB, 3000x1992, 1327539416669.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431855

>>4431825
You are required by federal law to fill out a 4473 form at a gunshow. Get your shit straight gun grabber. There is no gunshow loophole you fucking commie.

The original owner of the gun in that private sale must have gun through a background check per federal law at least. It is also illegal for a felon or anyone who normally couldn't buy that gun to buy that gun.

>> No.4431856
File: 30 KB, 630x412, loopholes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431856

>>4431825
"loophole"
and you better check yourself before you shrek yourself.
I'm sick of people making shit up and coming to the conclusion that everything they hear is a fact

>> No.4431857

>>4431849
>there are background checks
>resales don't have or require background checks, your argument is invalid
>ZOMG BIG BROTHER LIBERAL COMMUNIST NAZI MUH RIGHTS
Nice flailing there, bro.

>> No.4431858

>>4431707
So are you saying I can own ANY GUN on my property?

Also we MUST BAN assault cars! You dont need 500 HP to 65 mph now do you! You dont need turbochargers to bring your kids to school! You dont need fucking roll cages and spoilers to go to work! BAN ASSAULT CARS THINK OF THE CHILLUNZ

>> No.4431859

>>4431837
>implying you will ever disarm America

You aren't getting my guns. And don't think your little tax idea will do anything; I have several thousand rounds of ammo for each of my guns.

>> No.4431860

>>4431837
just bought 3000 rounds of 7.62x54r, they should tax you in your internet usage. its polluting the internet with bullshit. that pesky 1st amendment.

:)

>> No.4431861

>>4431853
I am talking about individual states, not that shit at the national level.

>> No.4431863

>>4431850
I wouldn't know. I know the ATF gave guns to criminals who they then lost and let walk out of the country, only to later enter the hands of criminals who murdered a border control agent.

Don't trust the ATF to do anything right, even if the law is on their side.

I am not a law enforcement officer, soon enough many states won't even have to register firearms to national databases like the ATF as long as they stay in-state. Why worry about loopholes that will be completely circumvented by state legislatures in coming months?

>> No.4431866
File: 243 KB, 1600x800, other_news.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431866

>> No.4431870

>>4431836
The only way to properly regulate private sales would require the creation of a registry. I'll refer you to Canada to see how that turned out. Imagine America with over 100 times more guns.

>> No.4431871

>>4431858
>implying you don't have to have a licence to drive a car

>> No.4431873

>>4431704
Only if you're holding the gun hanging down at your side like an idiot. If you're in a home invasion, the gun should be up and in firing position the second it's in your hand. If it's already pointed forward, all you have to do is turn it towards the target and squeeze.

>> No.4431874

>>4431857

>All sales require background checks save one type
>that type still has laws dictating who can buy
>ZOMG NEED MORE LAWS, THROW OUT PRIVACY AND PROPERTY LAW

>> No.4431875

>>4431852
This is the fucking cooking board. Why the FUCK is there a fucking BABBYKILLUNGUNZ thread that started with a sandwich? By the way, OP, that sandwich looks delicious, I give you 7/10 for lack of hot sauce.

>> No.4431876
File: 12 KB, 741x530, 1363634886229.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431876

>>4431338
>>4431303
Actually statistics show a gun in the home is more safe then without one, considering chances for burglary, tresspassing, etc. You are far more likely to be killed by your doctor from mal practice then being shot from the gun in your home.

>> No.4431877

>>4431861
See Civil War

>> No.4431878

>>4431870
So what you're saying is that background checks don't prevent anyone from purchasing guns.

>> No.4431879

>>4431871
>implying you need a license or registration to drive a car on private property

>> No.4431880

>>4431871
You only have to have a license to operate a car on a public road. Why would you believe otherwise? Like I said >>4431710


Enjoy your completely unregistered home-defense vehicle in peace. It's not necessary to follow any laws unless you drive off your private property.

>> No.4431881

>>4431871
you dont. only on government roads.

you can drive it on your own land without any paperwork

>> No.4431884

>>4431871
>implying most states you dont need a license to buy a gun
>implying some states you can even carry a gun in public

>> No.4431888
File: 201 KB, 405x323, Whats the matter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431888

>> No.4431889

>>4431875
Because liberals must tell people their feelings

>> No.4431892

>>4431889
And likewise, responsible gun owners protect their already-protected rights. Audibly. Thus the cycle of life continues.

>> No.4431894

>>4431877
oh boy a second civil war is going to be started because of the 2nd amendment?

LOL you guys truely are crazy, gun nuts indeed.

>> No.4431895

>>4431889
>How do you tell a liberal from a conservative?
>You don't have to, they'll fucking tell you.

>> No.4431896

>>4431875

Liberals just CAN NOT FUCKING HANDLE when someone lives differently than they do.

>> No.4431898

>>4431878
Never said that. Dealers having to perform background checks is a great thing. But background checks one private sales is realistically unenforceable.

>> No.4431899

>>4431844
Like your source, fucko? Can't be bothered to read the law, at least you could hit wikipedia.

Presently, 18 states regulate private firearm sales at gun shows. Seven states require background checks on all gun sales at gun shows (California, Colorado (§12-26.1-101 and § 24-33.5-424, CRS), Rhode Island, Connecticut, Oregon, New York, and Illinois). Four states (Hawaii, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) require background checks on all handgun, but not long gun, purchasers at gun shows. Seven states require individuals to obtain a permit to purchase handguns that involves a background check (Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota). Certain counties in Florida require background checks on all private sales of handguns at gun shows. The remaining 33 states do not restrict private, intrastate sales of firearms at gun shows in any manner.[18][19]

>>4431849
OMG THEY REGULATE MY HOBBY WHICH KILLS PEOPLE ITS PROOF THEY WANT TO RUN MY LIFE AND NAZI COMMuNISM

moron

>> No.4431900

>>4431338
>a house with a gun in it is more likely to have a resident shot with a gun.

[citation needed]

>> No.4431901
File: 507 KB, 213x118, you+re+an+idiot+_e5595b4e4a7687b7ef9c87a5a1b308d7.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431901

>>4431837
>lost the debate at a federal level
>Most Americans don't want gun control
>Only a very loud minority
>With 0 statistical evidence to prove that new laws and legislations would provide any sort of change to any of our violent crime rate other than causing it to go up
>Full argument is "MUH CHILLUNS TINK OF DEM" "COMMON SENSE GUISE!" "THINK OF MUH CHILDRESN" "90%!!!!!"
>Is THIS mad about losing the debate
>I HOPE YOU SPILL YOUR MILK AT SCHOLL TOMORROW >:(!!!!
>lol
>mfw

>> No.4431902

>>4431895
Lol

>> No.4431904

>>4431894
Its only about guns and not the fact that the government can monitor your phones, detain you without purpose, cancle your rights, and spy on you with drones.

Only about th guns... YUP

>> No.4431907

>>4431894
See... the thing about anything on the Bill of Rights.... you're pretty much guaranteed a civil war when someone fucks with it. That's why it's there. It's un-fuckable, or your government has collapsed.

>> No.4431908

>>4431874
>not just anyone can buy a gun because DURR BAKGRUND CHEKS
>background checks are ineffectual and can be avoided
>BAWW MUH FREEDUMBS
What's your point, exactly?

>> No.4431909

>>4431898
how?

>> No.4431906

>>4431852

I'm for regulation, and I own 2 guns shithead. Both given as gifts, and no background check thus required.

>> No.4431910

>>4431899
>New Jersey
>implying you even own any cool longguns

>> No.4431911
File: 268 KB, 799x444, Gun Control in a nutshell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431911

To all of the people saying "hurr durr the police will protect us":

>Warren v. The District of Columbia

The Police have no legal obligation to protect you. They have a moral obligation to protect you, but they also have a moral obligation not to take bribes or arrest people for driving while black. Hell, half the time the Police are no better than the criminals that they supposedly protect us from.

Pic unrelated, but still relevant to this discussion.

>> No.4431913

>>4431899
That still isn't a loophole.

People are still required to fill out the FFL at gun shows

>> No.4431915

>>4431898
So basically background checks are useless and don't prevent anyone from buying guns.

>> No.4431916

>>4431894
Its is a fucking amendment! The second fucking amendment! Hell yeah ill fight for it! Without our constitution, what are we?

>> No.4431919
File: 91 KB, 684x771, 1363574803772.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431919

>>4431892
>already protected rights
who do you think is protecting them?
do you know what our politician are sworn to do or how legislation gets passed?

>> No.4431922

>>4431909
... Are you serious? Think about it.

>> No.4431924

>>4431904
>implying there is more than one amendment
>implying the US constitution has other parts in it

The reason it's called the "second" amendment is because it only takes a second for the boogy man to rape your entire family. Unless, of course, you exercised the second amendment. DON'T TREAD ON ME!!!!~!!ONE

And by ONE I mean I'm a ONE issue voter.

>> No.4431925

>>4431338
> accidents happen

luckily that doesn't justify banning, otherwise everyone would walk to work.

>> No.4431926

>>4431727
So start backing up.

Target is a foot away. Your gun is already pointed at their chest, because you have learned to keep it up in the firing position like a well-prepared homeowner. Step back and fire. Step back and fire. Step back and fire. You have now increased the distance, even if only marginally, between you and the invader; you have also put three bullets in his chest in less than 3 seconds.

>> No.4431927

>>4431892
>already-protected rights
Man, I wish it was that easy...

>> No.4431930
File: 41 KB, 562x437, 1364319869125.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431930

>>4431495
>the eu
Hahaha. Oh wow.
>Balkan
>Smuggled weapons
You see how these two come together?
You wouldn't have any problems getting a gun here in Sweden where I live illegaly.
That's the thing, criminals break the law.

>> No.4431931
File: 220 KB, 572x267, 1332374717371.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431931

>>4431899
You don't know what a that difference is between private sale and a sale at a gun show by a dealer is do you?

>OMG THEY REGULATE MY HOBBY WHICH KILLS PEOPLE ITS PROOF THEY WANT TO RUN MY LIFE AND NAZI COMMuNISM
>hobby
Oh gun grabbers. You're so funny in how you trample the bill of rights.

>> No.4431932

>>4431924
You can stop shitposting at anytime

>> No.4431933

>>4431871
What is a CCW

>> No.4431934

>>4431901
lulz we are not mad that we lost the national push for gun control. All that means is we will have to push little by little in each state to get more laws on the books. This is already happening, so far this year New York, Colorada, and connecticut have enacted more gun control laws for their states.
More states will come over time, as more of these sick shootings happen more and more gun laws will be enacted in more and more states.

>> No.4431935

>>4431900
>missing the point
try reading that again

>> No.4431936

>>4431899
>Like your source, fucko?

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

stay mad

>> No.4431937

>>4431919
>>4431927
I didn't say it was easy, they're only protected by the validity of our government being unable to touch them. If they touch them, well then you have no valid government. That's when it's complicated.

Unfortunately, even among gun owners fighting the government's nearly impossible. You know libtards WANT to live in the prison state. They love it so much they invent new laws to arrest people for.

>> No.4431938

>>4431751
>implying banning guns in america will do anything

How do you suggest completely removing a gorllion guns?

>> No.4431941

>>4431909
Unenforceable? Read what I said earlier. It would require the creation of a registry otherwise people would just illegally trade each other guns. Registry is not good. See Canada's Long Gun Registry failure.

>>4431915
Yes they do. They make it impossible for people who shouldn't own guns to purchase them from dealers.

>> No.4431943
File: 10 KB, 275x183, k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431943

has a /ck/ thread EVER moved this fast?

>> No.4431944

>>4431896
I agree
>2013
>liberals still acting fucktarded on a DAILY BASIS

>> No.4431946

>>4431911
>but muh perfect police!!!

>> No.4431947

>>4431911

This.

>> No.4431948

>>4431749
Except they punish evil murderers, and self-defence is an acceptable argument in court.

There are allowances in the law that allow those who kill in self-defence to go free. The same is not true with gun bans.

>> No.4431949

>mfw /ck/ is filled with libtards

I'm... sorry...

>> No.4431950
File: 68 KB, 552x516, 1365825666915.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431950

>>4431899
>OMG THEY REGULATE MY HOBBY WHICH KILLS PEOPLE ITS PROOF THEY WANT TO RUN MY LIFE AND NAZI COMMuNISM

Holy shit you are stupid.
>>4431900
>a house with a gun in it is more likely to have a resident shot with a gun.
>[citation needed]
• Five times more likely to burn to death
• Five times more likely to drown
• 17 times more likely to be poisoned
• 17 times more likely to fall to your death
• And 68 times more likely to die in an automobile accident

In 2007, there were only 54 accidental gun deaths for children under age 13. About
12 times as many children died from drowning during the same period

In 2007,
there were 999
drowning victims
and 137 firearmrelated accidental
deaths in age
groups 1 through
19. This despite
the fact that
firearms
outnumber pools
by a factor of
more than 30:1.
Thus, the risk of
drowning in a
pool is nearly 100
times higher than
dying from a firearm-related accident for everyone, and nearly 500 times for children
ages 0-5
>WISQARS Injury Mortality Report, Center for Disease Control, 2007
>Ibid
> National Center for Health Statistics, and the National Spa and Pool Institute

faggot

>> No.4431959

>>4431749
Murderers should be prosecuted

Not the tools they use

But of course, people rather blame the tool than a dead man.

>> No.4431960

>>4431926
>So start backing up.
And he starts following you. Your gun is not pointed at their chest because he's a foot away and stabbing you.

>> No.4431952

>>4431934
Fortunately, they'll all be restricted to gun-ban states and they'll only be your children dying. Free states will have armed teachers and citizenry to stop them...

>> No.4431955
File: 65 KB, 1395x154, 1367027620417.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431955

>>4431449
And the civilian population of the USA is flush with firearms. What's your point?

There are plenty of 20th century examples of successful civilian uprising against a standing army. We keep our .223s and our .308s and we keep our ability to say "no thanks" to government oppression.

>> No.4431957

>>4431924

>implying we're not ALSO pissed about that

You call use conspiracy nuts whenever we talk about the expansion of government powers, and now you're going to act like we NEVER FUCKING SAY ANYTHING?

Man, go fuck yourself with a goddamned cactus. I'm so tired of your fucking shit.

>> No.4431958

>>4431922
That would require a national registry of all firearms with mandatory regular inspections by authorities to see if you haven't "misplaced" a piece of your property.

None of which would stop criminals or future-criminals from acquiring firearms. So what are all these new laws and expensive Weapons Inspector/Registrar jobs going to really do? Make you feel better?

>> No.4431961

>>4431950
Fact: Medical mistakes kill 400,000 people per year – the equivalent of almost three
fully loaded Boeing 747 jet crashes per day – or about 286 times the rate of all accidental
firearm deaths.100 This translates into 1 in 6 doctors causing an accidental death, and 1 in
56,666 gun owners doing the same.
Fact: Only 2% of gun deaths are from accidents, and some insurance investigations
indicate that many of these may not be accidents after all.101
Fact: Around 2,000 patients each year – six per day – are accidentally killed or injured in
hospitals by registered nurses.102
Myth: Handguns are unsafe and cause accidents
Fact: Most fatal firearm accidents involve long guns, which are more deadly. These are
typically hunting accidents.103
Fact: Handguns have triggers that are difficult for small (child) hands to operate, and are
rarely the cause of accidents.

>> No.4431962

>>4431642
>WILL PREVENT 90% OF GUN MASSACRES

name one gun "massacre" that would have been stopped by a background check

>> No.4431963

>>4431535
Nope.
Not what I implied at all.
I only implied that blaggards gonna blag.
Nice try though.

>> No.4431964

>>4431756
You imply, of course, that the vast majority of bad people don't buy their guns and ammo off the black market.

>> No.4431971

>>4430447
Then leave. It's not "our" country if you dislike it so much. Fucking traitor.

>> No.4431966

>>4431952
Guns in the classroom, nice...
lol you think with all the teachers unions you will be able to do that? There are teachers unions in most states, even the right to work states. Also most teachers are liberal and dont believe in guns in the classroom.
But whatever get the guns in your classrooms. The day that a kid freaks out and takes the teachers gun and kill students/teachers/himself is the day that gun control will really happen in this country so have at it.
The sooner the better.

>> No.4431967

/k/ here. Will you niggers fuck off and start posting more delicious sandwhiches?

>> No.4431968

>>4431950
>ban assault pools

>> No.4431969

>>4431935
I looked, still don't see any proof for your baseless claim. If you are tying to logic, then I would image someone who is very familiar with a firearm is less likely to get hurt by it then someone who isn't.

>> No.4431970

>>4431950
>Keeping a firearm in the home increases the risk of suicide by a factor of 3 to 5 and increases the risk of suicide with a firearm by a factor of 17
>An estimated 41% of gun-related homicides and 94% of gun-related suicides would not occur under the same circumstances had no guns been present
>Gun death rates are 7 times higher in the states with the highest compared with the lowest household gun ownership.

No one decides between a gun and a pool, fucktard. Are you high?

>> No.4431973

>>4431955

There was a fucking armed revolt on US soil 70 fucking years ago, for christ's sake. Eleanor Roosevelt wrote an editorial praising the townsfolk.

http://voices.yahoo.com/mcminn-county-war-reminder-11654246.html?cat=37

>> No.4431975

>>4431941
>They make it impossible for people who shouldn't own guns to purchase them from dealers.
Which would be a huge inconvenience if you couldn't find about 100 guns being sold at any time by private sellers in your area over Craigslist.

>> No.4431977

>>4430447
You're no better than anybody else, dillweed.

>> No.4431980

>>4431934
Yet hilariously, SCOTUS has consistently been pro-gun. Also, more states in the Union are pro-gun vs. no-gun. I'm actually fine with states having their own regulations, however they still must go by the 2nd Amendment.

>> No.4431981

>>4431975
Craigslist actually doesn't allow firearm sales

You lose.

>> No.4431982

>>4431963
>gun owners pull guns for petty butthurt revenge
>so you're saying gun owners pull guns for petty butthurt revenge?
>Nope.
Yep.

>> No.4431984

>>4431975
Okay, what do you suggest then? It has to be enforceable though.
Forgetting the fact that CL doesn't allow the trade of firearms.

>> No.4431985

>>4431966
Thats why they're trained. You don't think every police officer has a retention holster to prevent that exact scenario? You think that it's easier to steal a pistol from a teacher than to buy one legally, or steal one from an irresponsible family member?

You've gotta face reality(seriously, please god face reality), some areas will never. ever. EVER. ban guns. Those places are where most of the Red State type voters are. They're modifying state constitutions as well to make it ILLEGAL to ban guns. Unmodifiable in perpetuity. Your gun control efforts have in fact backfired in those areas.

>> No.4431986

I for one think cooking knifes longer than three inches should be regulated. Knives longer than two inches and shorter than three could be allowed, so long as the point is rounded. Only butchers need large knives with sharp points.

>> No.4431989

>>4431955

And all those uprisings had the support or access to actual ordnance - even the IRA was supplied by Libya and Boston. Since 1914 unsupported infantry has been a slaughter, nothing else.

Keep your .223, but the idea you're going to take on the US army with it is laughable.

>> No.4431990

>>4431981
>Craigslist is the only buy/sell ad service in the world
I see.

>> No.4431992
File: 11 KB, 500x300, HESITANT BOX.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431992

>>4430426
What... what's that blue stuff?

>> No.4431993
File: 10 KB, 171x176, 1363218476542.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431993

>>4431970
No, if someone wants to kill themselves they will find other means of doing it if a gun is not available.

For every accidental death (802), suicide (16,869) or homicide (11,348)207with a
firearm (29,019), 13 lives (390,000)208 are preserved through defensive use.

54% of these deaths are suicides405 (80% in Canada406). Numerous studies have
shown that the presence or absence of a firearm does not change the overall (i.e., gun plus
non-gun) suicide rate.
>405 National Center for Health Statistics, average rates for years 1981 through 2003.
>406 Death Involving Firearms, Kathryn Wilkins, Health Report vol. 16, no 4, Statistics Canada

>> No.4431994

>>4431986
It's funny, some... teacher? in the UK was recently stabbed in the face with a screwdriver.

>> No.4431995

>>4431992
You don't want to know.

>> No.4431996

>>4431937
>You know libtards WANT to live in the prison state

Stupid shit teabaggers just magically KNOW

>> No.4431997

>>4431757
Well if a mass shooting (4+ persons) was stopped then it wasn't a mass shooting, was it? Therefore, it won't be reported on the news because no one cares about stuff that DIDN'T happen.

>> No.4431998

>>4431975
It's ALREADY illegal for a felon to purchase a gun in a private sale.

>> No.4431999
File: 29 KB, 400x219, jump_the_gun.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4431999

>>4431950
>agreeing with me in a disagreeable way

>> No.4432000

>>4431992
If only spoilers worked here.

>> No.4432001

>>4431996
>EVERYBODY WHO DISAGREES WITH ME IS A TEABAGGER

>> No.4432002

>>4431989
Yeah, because the US army is an evil robot army without morals, ties with thousands of civilians or anything.

>> No.4432006

>>4431990
movingthegoalposts.jpg

>> No.4432007

>>4431985
Red states are shrinking, fewer and fewer every year.

>> No.4432008

>>4431931

Jesus. Most sales at gun shows are classified as private sales. Stop making up meaningless distinctions, as the fact is plain that it's trivial to buy a weapon without a background check in most of the US.

>> No.4432005
File: 104 KB, 612x612, america land of the free.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432005

>>4431984
>my name is tyrone and im here to rape you
>i have an illegal gun i received from my connections with the Cambodian drug cartels
>you are a fervent anti gunner and your state has an assault weapon ban
>you have no guns
>you have 30 seconds to defend yourself from death and anal devastation
>the police are 5 minutes away
>....
>You are dead

>> No.4432009

>>4431989

>we must get these military guns off our streets
>Those aren't military guns, you'll never win a revolt

MAKE UP YOUR FUCKING MIND.

>> No.4432010
File: 55 KB, 490x440, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432010

/ck/ - cooking with /k/omrades

>> No.4432011

>>4431994
Only craftsmen should be allowed hammers and screwdrivers. A license for each piece of dangerous equipment must be received and renewed annually.

>> No.4432012

>>4431970
>you are less likely to die by a gun when there is no gun present

No shit? You mean if I don't have a gun I can't kill myself with a gun? Oh man, guess I'll just have to go get a rope.

>> No.4432013
File: 55 KB, 330x357, Feelsgoodmangreen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432013

>>4431955

>MFW I was the guy who screencapped that last night.

>> No.4432015
File: 173 KB, 1024x1707, galil4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432015

Galil is best raifu, and her cherry pie must be delicious.

>> No.4432018

>>4431998
It's illegal for him to own a gun, but it's perfectly legal to sell to him if you "don't know" he's a felon, and you're not obligated to even ask if it's a private sale.

>> No.4432019

>>4431934
>as more of these sick shootings happen more and more gun laws will be enacted in more and more states.
>Sandy Hook
>happens in CT
>some of the strongest gun laws in the nation
That...that really, really helped with Sandy Hook, didn't it? Especially the part where the shooter killed his mother, took her guns, then proceeded to walk into a school which was undefended by any particularly quick police force and killed innocents?

I'm not even saying that "guns could have stopped this." The fact of the matter is that the laws pretend that even a bolt-action single-shot .22 won't kill someone.
Nickle-and-dime gun laws like you're proposing literally have no power to help people because it's ignoring that any gun is a lethal weapon in the wrong hands. All it literally does is make people who don't understand how guns work feel less in danger, when they literally aren't.
That's the sad part of antigun legislation.

>> No.4432020
File: 370 KB, 900x1200, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432020

>>4430378
I'm a bit late to the party, but here's my lunch today...
>inb4 poorfag

>> No.4432021

>>4432002
That's not what anybody is saying, though.

You ever heard of the Boy Scout motto, "Be prepared"?

>> No.4432022

>>4431996
There's a qualifier in that next sentence:

Want to live in a prison state BECAUSE they invent new laws to arrest people for. Believe it or not, it's your Big Government types that get non-violent offenders sentenced. Your kind fueled the War on Drugs. Big Insurance? Well sure, you're putting low-income people out of work since it's becoming too expensive to keep them employed..... maybe you should stop trying to help.

>> No.4432023

>>4432008

[Citation needed]

Almost all booths at gun shows are run by gun stores.

>> No.4432024
File: 16 KB, 400x309, thumbsup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432024

>>4431986
Actually, France had a law like that a couple of hundred years ago.

>> No.4432025

>>4432006

Pretty sure there's some straw man and ad hoc or something too. I read about it on the internet. Make sure to mention all these latin words to show off your learnings.

>> No.4432026

>>4431996
>2013
>still using teabagger

Okay Occupier

>> No.4432027

>>4432008
>Most sales at gun shows are classified as private sales.

Source or GTFO

>> No.4432028

>>4430378
You should eat a vegetable.

>> No.4432030

>>4432008
You can make your own gun too if you wanted. There still is no gunshow loophole or any loophole for that matter. They are private sales and are fully legal. And again it's illegal for anyone who wouldn't be able to buy a gun normally to by one in a private sale.

>> No.4432031

>>4431796
DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK DO YOU WANT TO OWN A TANK

>> No.4432040
File: 59 KB, 710x384, stockings = god.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432040

>>4432015
JIDF pls go

>> No.4432041

>>4432028
>cucumber
>not a vegetable

>>4432030
Oh god. You're here. Welcome!

>> No.4432032

>>4432001

Most morons saying blanket stupidities like 'you just KNOW liberals want to x' are. Liberals have no vast conspiracy plan, so go back to pretending you're going to stop a nigger from invading your home.

>> No.4432033

>>4431538
>2013
>Having a kid.
How can I touch my prostate with my guns with kids running around?

Also. I like that the person with the "conservative" view point DIDN'T draw attention to race, but you did.

>I'm a centrist btw.

>> No.4432034

>>4432028
Pickles are vegetables

>> No.4432036

>>4432006
>implying you can't buy and sell guns via wanted ads
The goalposts are where they are. Background checks can very easily be circumvented and are moot.

>> No.4432037
File: 482 KB, 1000x738, Sandwich-Madness-Bracket-10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432037

>>4431969
i agree with you i was just pointing out that statics are retarded. going along with the pool thing, if you have a pool you are more likely to drown in it than if you didn't. well yeah of course. how can you drown your pool you don't have? how can you shoot yourself with a gun you don't have?

>> No.4432038

>>4432005
didnt mean to reply to that post

>> No.4432039

>>4432031
Fuck yeah I do

But I won't use it to harm others!

>> No.4432042

>>4432025
>>4432018
>perfectly legal to sell to him if you "don't know" he's a felon

Ignorance does not justify breaking the law.

>> No.4432044
File: 65 KB, 500x375, 1329690366611.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432044

>>4432018
We better ban breaking the law then.

>> No.4432045

>>4431959
>of course, people rather blame the tool than a dead man.
Only if it's scary. You don't see this sort of thing happening with knives, fertilizer/gas access, and hammers (yes, hammers).
Hell, even pistols get less rap than "assault weapons" because they're smaller and less intimidating, even though they're providing the bulk of more or less any death/injury by guns.

This more or less shows that anti-gun legislation aims at "not-actually reducing gun violence."

>> No.4432046
File: 999 KB, 250x251, 1363455930461.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432046

>>4431681
Theater had a nogunz policy if I'm not mistaken.

But then how could someone bring a gun inside?

>> No.4432047

>>4432031
...I want?

>> No.4432054

>>4432023

Nice citation there.

>> No.4432048

>>4432036
yea people can break laws. not seeing how this relates to making more laws

:/

>> No.4432049

>>4432036
How do you make Tyronne perform a background check when passing his piece to Jammal?
This is already illegal by the way.

>> No.4432050

>>4432042
How the fuck are we supposed to know he's a felon?

Sew a symbol to his clothing saying "FELON"?

I mean it worked in Nazi Germany, so...

>> No.4432051

>>4432032
And you go back to your world of rainbows and ponies and holding hands while singing.

>> No.4432052

>>4431392
>implying I wouldn't teach him to be responsible with it
it is entirely possible, you know, that having learned to be safe with firearms, he won't immediately blow his brains out upon finding one. Maybe you should teach your kids to be safe instead of constantly worrying about easily preventable shit and voting to make everyone less free because of your fear and delusions.

>> No.4432053
File: 184 KB, 908x645, g3a3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432053

>>4432040
JIDF? Get the fucl out pleb.

>> No.4432055

>>4432042
Actually it's a common legal device. What would an average person under those circumstances be required to know? Lots of laws exist that require 'common knowledge' or some variant that would apply in that case. Can average Joe recognize mental illness from a few seconds of salesmanship? No? Then you're off the hook.

If you're a discerning salesman, you simply ask for a CCW permit or the state variant which many people will already have. This guarantees that they check out. This is the most common practice.

>> No.4432056
File: 6 KB, 403x63, invasion.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432056

Never seen a thread flood this fast on /ck/

We've been invaded by weekend /k/

>> No.4432057
File: 68 KB, 600x458, image_08_05_020_R07-2010.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432057

>>4432019

Indeed. I think that it's a crying shame that teachers need to be armed... But guns are the only things that will stop the next Adam Lanza.

>>4431911

...But the police will always be there for us... R-right?

>> No.4432058

>>4432037
How can you defend yourself from Tyrone Swag if he's the only one with a gun?

>> No.4432059

>>4431819
Fine. One foot. If your gun is up in a firing position where it should be, your barrel/camera phone will be right up against their chest. The second their body even tenses, you should be backing up and shooting/clicking.

>> No.4432060

>>4431960
>not that guy but,
You do realize that in that case, there's a gun? Anybody in knife range with the jump on you is already going to get his licks in.
The gun's there in hopes to stop it.

That's certainly much better than a knife or your fists.

>> No.4432061

>>4432056
>implying this isn't best /k/orea

>> No.4432062
File: 272 KB, 548x449, you know it was them.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432062

>>4432053
God, I hate that picture.

>> No.4432063

>>4431445
You monster, how dare you think about defending your family?!?!

>> No.4432064

>>4432033

Might want to read the thread, shitcompoop, where there's about 20 references to Jamal or other black names. Because conservatives all seem to have a need for black cock.

>> No.4432065

>>4432005
>my name is tyrone and i'm here to rape you
>i have an illegal gun i received from my connections with the Cambodian drug cartels
>i have years and years of experience in using that gun against armed people
>you have your weekend visits to the shooting range
>i approach any person as if they were armed so i don't make retarded mistakes your instructor told you i would make
>have all the guns you want
>i have killed many gun owners
>you are dead.

>> No.4432066

>>4432050
Because then anyone can just say they didn't know they were breaking the law and get away scott-free you fucking idiot.

>> No.4432068

>>4432007
And the 3rd party candidates are getting more and more popular because more and more people are realising the differences between the left and right are miniscule baring social policies that get people pissed off.
>Registered Independent
You and your party, and the other party can both get fucked because you're both ruining this country with your senseless babble about shit nobody except facebook soccer moms and old people give one rats ass about.

>> No.4432069

>>4432020
crumbs, crumbs everywhere

>> No.4432071

>>4431982
This just in!
Criminals and bad people will follow laws and codes of civility!
Praise Jebus!

I end this episode in my day by letting you know that THIS GUY is a gun owner who doesn't pull guns for any reason other than punching paper or protecting myself. Your blanket statement has at least one hole in it.

I'll come back to /ck/ when I want to know how to spice up my ramen, but this whole experience has left a ...

BAD TASTE IN MY MOUTH!

>> No.4432073

>>4432045

Yeah, it's not like we track the sale of ammonium fertilizer. Oh wait . . .

>> No.4432074

>>4432049
You don't. You can't. And that's why background checks are ineffectual bullshit.

>> No.4432076

>>4432056
Lay back and enjoy it, we know you can't defend yourselves.

>>4432057
SCOTUS says police don't have a responsibility to protect citizens. Better hope you can afford private security, bro.

>>4432065
Seriously though, most gun injuries sustained in the USA are treatable in hospitals. We are not a 3rd world country and only the luckiest (or heavily sprayed LAPD-tier) of shots are fatal these days.

>> No.4432078

>>4432055
How does that post in any way justify a sale to a felon?

>> No.4432079

>>4432051

My world just isn't jerking off waiting for a race war that won't happen. You think that's rainbows?

>> No.4432081

>>4432071
Who said anything about criminals?

>> No.4432082
File: 1.47 MB, 1600x1205, 1367129709806.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432082

>>4432056
pic related fuk year

This whole thread, at least the last half, should be archived. Its like teaching 3 years of legal advice, criminal theory, and statistics on gun violence in the course of an Hour. I am proud of you /k/.

>> No.4432083

>>4432064
cool shitposting bro

>> No.4432084

>>4432050
It takes 2 years to finish a lease on a car
It takes 4 years to finish college
It takes 6 years for your child to go to grade school
it also took 6 years for Hitler to go from shit poor nation to Fascist Empire
It also took 6 years to kill >6 million

>> No.4432085
File: 360 KB, 350x350, 1333926245967.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432085

>>4432055
>even looking at their license
Man fuck that. I just hand him the gun case after holding the cash. After that we bask in glorious Merican freedoms.
>>4432056
I knew I would somehow get the credit.

>> No.4432086

>>4432082
>posting CP
I hope you get banned, faggot.

>> No.4432088

>>4431989
>who are the taliban, NVA and VC?

>> No.4432089

>>4432071

This just in! Your gun isn't going to prevent crime!

>> No.4432091

>>4432079
Yeah, gotta love the Utopia~

Oh wait...

>> No.4432093
File: 322 KB, 1247x806, BEST KOREA BEACH IS BEST THAN EVEN SHITTY FLORIDA BEACH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432093

>>4432056
fuck yeah /k/

>> No.4432094

>>4432076
>Seriously though, most gun injuries sustained in the USA are treatable in hospitals.
What does that have to do with anything?

>> No.4432096

>>4432078
It.... justifies the responsible gun salesman's rights to sell guns to responsible gun owners. It's not his responsibility to thoroughly screen every single person he sells a weapon to.

Every American except a few who've magically lost god-given rights(debtable, but too late) is granted the rights to have guns. If you take out obvious 'yo gimme dem glock and glock bullets' obvious shifty-person sales, you've gotten a large majority of POSSIBLE felons off the list.

You are now responsible ENOUGH to not invalidate real owners rights. This on top of it being the government's responsibility to track and record felons, not the gun shop owner.

>> No.4432097

>>4431871
>What is private property

>> No.4432099

>>4432086
>seeing it as something sexual
Pal, I've got bad news for you...

>> No.4432102

>>4432086

Don't worry, her genitals were all burned off by the napalm.

>> No.4432104
File: 1.47 MB, 320x240, 0dv31.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432104

>>4432013
>mfw when I wrote it

>> No.4432106
File: 32 KB, 155x137, g3a3 lololol.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432106

>>4432062
lol I knew you would

>> No.4432107

>>4432088

Did you bother to read above, where I explicitly list where each of those armies was supplied from?

The NVA had its own air force. Hardly a group of militia members keeping a reign on tyranny by shooting targets.

>> No.4432108

>>4432094
That has everything to do with someone getting into a gun battle with an armed criminal. At worst, you die where you would have died anyway. At best, you disable the criminal without killing him. In the middle, you both get shot and survive. This is the 21st century, defense is mandatory and murder is optional.

>> No.4432109

>>4432065
So you are saying its hopeless?

I have no chance right so why dont we just give up!

You here that folks time to give up, we never even had a chance.

>> No.4432110

>>4432096
You are talking about people with licenses, permits, and mental instability. I'm talking about felons.

>It's not his responsibility to thoroughly screen every single person he sells a weapon to.

talk to your local FFL

>> No.4432111

>>4431989
>What is tannerite?
>What is RDX?
>What is ANFO?
>What is basic chemistry?
I don't suppose you know anything about organic chemistry, do you?
These are all fairly simple things to make.

>> No.4432112

>>4432089
>Your gun isn't going to prevent crime!

As opposed to the police's guns which clearly are making us so much safer, especially when they're the only ones who have access to guns (you know, besides criminals).

>> No.4432113

>>4431384
>nuclear age
Hahah
Son, why do you think we're still pussyfooting around in the middle east?
Why do you think the USSR spent ten years in Afghanistan?
Why do you think we spent nearly twenty years in Vietnam?
Insurgency is effective.
Insurgency is what would be used.
Nobody has used nuclear weapons since WWII, a total war, despite the large number of insurgencies fought by nuclear powers.
If governments don't nuke enemies of the state in other countries, they sure as fuck won't nuke their own people.
Violent revolution is entirely possible today. However, there are people who are trying to make that untrue in this country.
Just look at the Arab spring. A whole slew of corrupt governments were just toppled by their people.
Don't tell me that revolution is an anachronism.

>> No.4432117
File: 125 KB, 1183x884, 1359228795027.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432117

>>4432085

>> No.4432118

>>4431992
BLUE cheese

>> No.4432119

>>4432068
The people in the states of Colorado, New York, and connecticut seem to give a fuck.

Its ok, the next time a mass shooting happens even more laws will be enacted and in more states. 3rd party is not on the rise, even if it were it doesnt matter because its miniscule right now.
You are mad because you know you cant stop it, we will win even if we have to go state by state, even if we have to wait for new shootings to happen, even if it takes years upon years, in the end we will win.

>> No.4432120

>>4431384
because boston and the greater region did not get shut down by two young men using fireworks and household cooking items.

if 2 people can cause 350 million dollars worth of damage to a city by shutting it down for a week imagine what would happen on a larger scale.

im not condoning what they did but merely using that incident as an example to say that fireworks and a single ruger lc9 is not irrelevant in the nuclear age.

>> No.4432121

>>4432097

What amendment are you citing here? Fissable uranium can be private property, doesn't mean there's not a valid societal interest in regulating it.

>> No.4432122

>>4432097
>introducing obligatory gun licences is like banning cars
>muh freedoms
What is logic?

>> No.4432124

>>4432089
a gun is like a parachute, if you need one and don't have one, you will probably never need one again.
its not about preventing crime, its about defending my loved ones lives and protecting myself

>> No.4432126

Wow.
Lots of butthurt in here.
I mean yeah, there was a gun in the picture, though I think that's because he uses the same pic for /k/ when he asks us the same thing. And it wasn't even the focus of the picture. The sammich was.

tl;dr calm the fuck down guys. it's not that big a deal.
And go home /k/. cross board faggotry is a bad thing even when we do it, even if it is for a good cause.

Oh yeah, and i hate mayonnaise.
Not related to what I said at all, I just think that this would be the place to make this statement.

>now I get to be hated by /ck/ and /k/.

>> No.4432127

>>4431989
>he's never heard of Chechnya, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Cuba, or Syria

>> No.4432128

>>4431303
actually 2.5 million crimes are prevented yearly with firearms compared to around 10,000 homicides committed with guns.

>> No.4432129
File: 381 KB, 1280x720, 1365374448805.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432129

>>4432106

>> No.4432130

>>4432109
I'm saying guns are a safety blanket. Wards off bogeymen but does nothing to actually protect you.

>> No.4432131

>>4432110
I said thoroughly, if he puts him in the system and it says 'A-Okay', his responsibility ends there. The system exists, not everyone wants to use it. Either way, it's something that needs to be done within pre-existing regulatory bodies instead of legislative bodies.

Making FFL dealers background check people is a privilege to the general public, not a right.

>> No.4432132

>>4432082

If not /k/ I'd assume you were just trolling. This is just a bunch of dumb rednecks shitposting their poorly formed thoughts. Have you ever even heard of Max Weber? Didn't think so. Go back to school, son. Or at least, go back to /k/ to be amongst your kind.

>> No.4432133
File: 31 KB, 500x395, schindlers-list.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432133

>>4432079

I'm a /k/ommando and I'm not waiting for a race war. I'm a Jewfag myself.

>> No.4432134

>>4432111

They are. They're also not simple to make in bulk in effective forms for anything other than terrorism (an ineffective tatic of the weak).

Show me one successful revolution done without external supplies of real military equipment. It just doesn't exist in this day.

>> No.4432135

>>4432107
>what is the khyber pass pass

and you do realize all the guns they're "supplied" with are all at least 40-50 years old? some even as old as 100?

>> No.4432137

>>4432119
That what you guys said in '94 and look how that turned out.
Columbine happened under your watch and started a shitstorm, and your shit got repealed.

>> No.4432138
File: 24 KB, 282x381, 1366491964742.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432138

>>4432086
Except its not.
>>4432089
>This just in! Your gun isn't going to prevent crime!
Millions of times per year actually.

Thirty-nine states,
109 comprising the majority of the American population, are
"right-to-carry" states. Statistics show that in these states the crime rate fell (or did not
rise) after the right-to-carry law became active (as of July, 2006). Nine states restrict the
right to carry and two deny it outright.

After passing their concealed carry law, Florida's homicide rate fell from 36%
above the national average to 4% below,
111 and remains below the national average (as of
the last reporting period, 2005).

More to the point, crime is significantly higher in states without right-to-carry
laws.
114


BREAKIN NEWS YER A DUMBFAG

>> No.4432140
File: 4 KB, 127x121, 1327123680156s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432140

>>4432086
>loses the argument
>I HOPE YOU SPILL YOUR MILK TOMORROW AT SCKOOL, MEANIE! ;_;
>this is you, right now.
>/k/'s collective face when

>> No.4432141
File: 148 KB, 800x582, 1363241874156.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432141

>>4431490

>> No.4432142
File: 152 KB, 604x403, lol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432142

>>4431989
>you're going to take on the US army with it is laughable.

lol wut?

>> No.4432144

>>4432112

Didn't claim that, faggot. The fact the police aren't perfectly effectual doesn't make your own gun any less ineffectual in stopping crimes.

>> No.4432146

>>4432122
Go ahead and make the gun laws just like car laws. Just don't leave the part out were I'm allowed to own ANY firearm on my property just like I am with vehicles.

>> No.4432147

>>4432141
Damn Japan is GOAT

>> No.4432148
File: 45 KB, 492x474, race_war.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432148

>>4432133

>> No.4432149

>>4432108
At worst, you escalate the situation to dying where you would have just been robbed.

>> No.4432151

>>4432086
Napalm burns are pornography?

I didn't know you swinged like that, anon

>> No.4432152

>>4432131
>if he puts him in the system and it says 'A-Okay', his responsibility ends there

hence, felon discovered. you can stop now

>> No.4432155

>>4432144
Hummm, never knew having a gun in my holster was as ineffective as having a policeman in some distant donut shop...

>> No.4432156

>>4432149
That's not worst. Worst is getting killed. You pretend that the worst thing to happen is that he'll rob you and not shoot you for shits and giggles.

Why do you not recognize this is a problem?

What makes you think badguys aren't BADDER than your NEUTRALGUY image of them? They're bad for a reason. What makes this such a difficult mental block to overcome?

>> No.4432157

>>4432141
>>4432147
A. You realize most of those "deaths" are actually suicides by firearms, right?

B. If we counted all suicides, Japan would be top tier

>> No.4432158

>>4432113

READ ABOVE FUCKO.

Afganistan - supplied by the USA and China, including Stinger missiles (most effective weapon used against the USSR)

Vietnam - supplied by China and the USSR, including air power and tanks

Without armor and weapons that can neutralize helicopters the dream of violent revolution is a pipe dream

>> No.4432160

>>4432122
>muh freedoms
muh feelings

>> No.4432161

>>4432132
I am the only one backing my statments with sources so eat shit and stop letting your emotions operate your keyboard.

>dumb rednecks
laff, look at the statistics, guns are beneficial to society, while you fart smelling libtards are scared of another shooting so you just want to remove the cornerstone of what's keeping us standing.

>> No.4432163

>>4432149
>you would have just been robbed.

you're right, it's worth taking the risk.

>> No.4432164

>>4432158
>Without armor and weapons that can neutralize helicopters the dream of violent revolution is a pipe dream

You say that like it isn't possible to procure such arms

>> No.4432165

>>4432155
>my delusions of preparedness will protect me

>> No.4432166
File: 752 KB, 1974x1974, galil patch of cuteness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432166

>>4432129

>> No.4432168

>>4432137
>your shit got repealed.
It didn't get repealed; it just expired. Thank god, since it did jack shit.
>>4432119
>The people in the states of Colorado, New York, and connecticut seem to give a fuck.
>Its ok, the next time a mass shooting happens even more laws will be enacted and in more states.
Like with Sandy Hook and the numerous murders in NY and NYC everyday, that's...not actually DOING anything.
There are still so many gun murders that those laws aren't actually stopping.

>> No.4432169

>>4432149
Yeah, better leave it to luck and the robber's will, right?

>> No.4432171
File: 6 KB, 200x200, ˙ɹoʇɐɹǝuǝƃ+ǝɥʇ+s+ǝɹǝɥ+uɐılɐɹʇsnɐ+uı+ǝdʎʇ+oʇ+ʍoɥ+ƃuıɹǝpuoʍ+ǝɹ+noʎ+_6032c93397b25353030e479eb47c4c3d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432171

>>4432119
So you're openly admitting to standing on the graves of mass murder victims to further your agenda, and I'm the bad person.

>> No.4432172

>>4432120

Like I said, terrorism, a tatic of the weak, has never caused a successful revolution. The PLO tried it for 20 years without success. It causes expense, but it's not going to change anything.

>> No.4432173

>>4432165
>police miles away will protect me

>> No.4432175

>>4432132
I'm a student at the University of Michigan staying in Ann Arbor, one of the most liberal cities in the state, and I oppose gun control

Far from being a "dumb redneck"

But of course, you libtards will cling to any stereotypes to support your ideals

>> No.4432176

>>4432171
Quit arguing like a bitch, even if you're on the good guy side. We don't need you.

>> No.4432178

>>4432156
So you're increasing your chances of not getting killed from zero to one in a million. You're right, that's much safer.

>> No.4432180
File: 62 KB, 485x362, Taliban members.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432180

>>4432158
cool history lesson bro. Let's speed up tot his century now though.

>> No.4432181

>>4432155

Oh, how many crimes has your gun stopped, faggot? None.

>> No.4432184

>>4432137
You think these gun laws are going to be repealed? The gun laws at the state level are not going to be repealed, the SCOTUS has already said states can regulate guns.

>> No.4432185

>>4432165
>my delusions of Utopia will create a forcefield around me

>> No.4432187

>>4432173
>imaginary scenarios i run in my head every day will protect me

>> No.4432190
File: 119 KB, 529x799, 1362453929.iamanengineer_normal_dsc_5158 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432190

>>4432158
I love how a lot of retards think jets can stand on corners and enforce laws, or tanks can shoot hospitals full of weapons caches. The second the gubmint starts killing its own followers they are only reinforcing their enemy.

>> No.4432192

>>4431960
>and he starts following you
Which is why you pull the trigger, dipshit. It takes a lot less time and physical effort to squeeze one finger than it does to swing an entire arm around.

>> No.4432193

>>4431296

>Ah yes, the "government is too weak to handle law enforcement" argument. And yet they're so damm strong they're gonna come into 300 million homes and make everyone renounce Christ and give up their guns.

Governments are not capable of preventing crime by simple logic, you imbecile. Unless they can observe crime before it happens, their role is purely reactionary. They show up once a crime has been committed to either catch the perpetrator, prevent escalation, or collect evidence for later conviction. They don't pull up guns blazing the second you call and say there's a man breaking into your house. You're also beginning this conversation by making fundamentalist strawmen and characterizing all opposition as holding a position they do not. Kindly fuck off and come back when you can stop debating like a child.

>>4431303
>the fact very few guns prevent crimes, and are more likely to kill a family member rather than an intruder

Do anti-gunners ever get tired of citing the same debunked study? Leave your goddamn echo chambers every once in a while, libtard, that study hasn't been taken seriously outside the Democratic Party line since 2008. the sample size was too small, the composition entirely flawed, the question biased, and the implications false.

>> No.4432194

>>4432178
Your chances of getting killed are always above 0. That's what you don't understand, sometimes people just murder other people. It's happened... forever? Maybe?

Nobody has ever willingly broken into somebody's home while armed and said "I was just going to wave this gun at them and make them run away."

>> No.4432195

>>4432185
>my rampant paranoia justifies everything

>> No.4432196

>>4432058
by bending over

>> No.4432197

>>4432164

From who? Who's selling tanks to the right wing militias once the Liberals Evil World Government takes over?

>> No.4432198
File: 19 KB, 300x275, American Flag &amp; Crying Bald Eagle Patriotic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432198

>>4432104

>mfw we're teaming up to defend our freedoms

>> No.4432199

>>4432158
>Without armor and weapons that can neutralize helicopters the dream of violent revolution is a pipe dream
So no outside force isn't going to jump at a chance to supply American rebels who actually get (vaguely) organized?

>> No.4432200

>>4432161
>sources

No, you're random numbers that may or may not be completely made up. Let's face it, an anonymous internet forum isn't a controlled study. A controlled study is something the NRA desperately doesn't want to happen. These threads just amount to people yelling at each other to feel good. Only a dumb /k/tard would think that 600 shitposts on a Sunday afternoon is equivalent to 3 years of legal theory and constitutional law.

tl;dr stop being stupid

>> No.4432201

>>4432181
>Estimates over the number of defensive gun uses vary wildly, depending on the study's population, criteria, time-period studied, and other factors. Higher end estimates by Kleck and Getz cite between 1 to 2.5 million DGUs in the United States each year.[1]:64-65[2][3] Low end estimates by Hemenway cite approximately 55,000-80,000 such uses each year.[4][5] Middle estimates have estimated approximately 1 million DGU incidents in the United States.[1]:65[6]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

Mine hasn't, but apparently a shit load of people are getting use out of theirs.

>> No.4432202

>>4432134
>They're also not simple to make in bulk in effective forms for anything other than terrorism
>(an tatic of the )
>ineffective
Ineffective? HAHAHAHA! Wait, you're being serious, aren't you?
>weak
And? Last I checked, combat is not fair, and those who use everything to their advantage tend to come out on top. Quit with your "honor in war" delusion

>Show me one successful revolution done without external supplies of real military equipment
Come and try to take our ability to protect myself, my family, my community, and my property, and you'll have yourself quite the revolution on your hands.

>> No.4432203

>>4432178
better than going the other way

>> No.4432205

>>4432181
On that same note, how much harm has my gun caused another individual? None.

Therefore there is no reason to limit my ability to use it and stock it with new parts, accessories, or ammunition.

Saying faggot doesn't do you any favors.

>> No.4432206

sooooooo, How bout food?

>> No.4432207

>>4431347

>gunfags seem to have this collective delusion that the ooga booga boogyman is the only possible way they or their loved ones are going to get shot. Whereas in fact, more likely, little 6 year old bobby joe is going to shoot little 7 year old cletus in the face when he finds the loaded gun under the mattress when mommy and daddy are out mud ridin'.

You're delusional. First of all, there are approximately 2.5 million defensive gun uses a year in the United States. In only 0.1% of these cases is someone fatally shot, because in most cases once a gun is brandished or shots are fired criminals will retreat. Even if you were more likely to shoot a family member than a criminal, you would be far more likely by brandishing or discharging a firearm to avoid any fatalities whatsoever in a confrontation.

also, you're still using blatant stereotyping and disingenuous strawmen here. Grow up.

>> No.4432208

>>4432200
>*you're posting

>> No.4432209

>>4432180

Oh, ok. So where's that successful revolution done just with AKs?

>> No.4432211
File: 46 KB, 800x569, ProTek1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432211

My new CCW lib killing gun loaded with 9mm Federal JHP 124 Grain +P+ Hydra Shok. Feel like fingering an angel.

>> No.4432212

>>4432194
>Nobody has ever willingly broken into somebody's home while armed and said "I was just going to wave this gun at them and make them run away."
Actually they have. It's called "armed robbery" and accounts for 99% of all robberies.

>> No.4432213

>>4432181
I stopped someone from vandalizing my grandmothers house with an SKS.

or you know, I could just link a 100 or so articles

>> No.4432214

>>4432138
Wait... You're a /k/ommando...?
Oh shit.. My bad... Carry on.

>>4432140
Nigger wat?
I'm from /k/, bro...

>> No.4432216

>>4432165
>me having something there in case I need it will protect me
FTFY
In all seriousness, if someone comes up to him with a gun, he has a gun. He's much better off to defend himself than someone with a knife/mace/defense baton and relying on the graciousness of the assaulter to "just take the money and leave."

If he don't need it, he got it and don't have to use it.

>> No.4432217

>>4431348
>You're just simply very unlikely to shoot an intruder
And very likely to prevent anyone from being shot in a confrontation. Or should I just challenge the knife- or baseball bat-weilding felon to a fistfight to prove I'm not a "pussy"?

You're a fucking idiot.

>> No.4432219

>>4432209
also home-made explosives

>> No.4432221

>>4432200
>CDC
>DOESN'T COUNT GUISE

>> No.4432223

>>4432190

I-is that you?

>> No.4432224

>>4432209
>revolution

what?

>> No.4432225

>>4432200
A controlled study IS something that has happened, and points in the favor of pro-gun legislation. Gun laws are having little to NO effect in populated regions of the USA.

>> No.4432226

>>4432200
Unfortunately, there are controlled studies on both sides, none of which come up with the same results. Neither can be trusted to any degree because politics and money are involved on both sides. Err on the side of safety..... whichever safety you prefer.

On the topic of erring on the side of safety, recognize that you have absolutely no right to infringe upon any other human being's rights. Whether you like guns or not, they are there. They are in the hands of criminals, they are in the hands of suicidal bitches/retarded rednecks. They are in the hands of rich white dudes. They are in the hands of police AND WILL NOT BE REMOVED BECAUSE THERES A REASON FOR THEM.

If there's a reason for cops to carry protection, every citizen has the option to also attempt their own protection. Cops aren't ubermensch, they don't get rights above that of other citizens. They don't get to take rights AWAY from other citizens. They get to do their jobs OR NOT because SCOTUS says they don't have to protect you. Also they like doughnuts.

>> No.4432228

>>4432200
The Center of Disease control and the FBI don't count as sources?

>> No.4432229

>>4432200
>CDC doesn't count!

yeah, you're not even worth arguing with. If you're so intent on wallowing in ignorance, so be it.

>> No.4432230

>>4432181
>Oh, how many crimes has your gun stopped, faggot? None.
Thank fucking god, I should hope it stays that way.
Though, IF I should need to, it's there.

>> No.4432231

>>4432192
You don't know what melee range means, do you?

>> No.4432232

>>4431380
>any gun designed for target shooting is going to make a piss-poor home defense weapon.

And I'm sure you have a lot of credibility to make this statement, right?

Have you done extensive testing with every firearm on the market to determine that a gun can't be both a good target shooter and home defense weapon?

Quit being such a dense cunt.

>> No.4432233

>>4432199

Again, your pipe dreams aside, no.

Who would do that? Your talking about the most xenophobic part of the US in open rebellion. Who's going to want to supply military equipment to them, with the possibility of US military retaliation?

China, the godless commies who we trade with?
Russia?
The Saudis, who buy their equipment from us?

>> No.4432235

>>4432102
>>4432099
Hey now, maybe that's a fetish of mine...


>>4432151
Naked child, center frame, no clothing.
I didn't realize the guy who posted it was a /k/unt.

>> No.4432237

>>4432212
They get convicted of armed robbery with a deadly weapon. That deadly weapon? It's deadly. That means that legally they have the intent to use it.

If they're carrying a replica, it's NOT 'with a deadly weapon.'

>> No.4432238

>>4432181
>simple assumptions
Even if he hasn't, what about his neighbor who does the same thing?
What about his neighbor's cousin who does the same thing?
While one particular individual may not have done anything, that doesn't mean that similar individuals as a whole have not.
While statistics on the number of crimes prevented by armed citizens varies wildly based on who you ask, it is a significant number, and one that should not be ignored due to fear.

>> No.4432240
File: 74 KB, 500x362, assault weapons.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432240

>> No.4432241

>>4432201

AHAHAHAHAHA Hemenway's study? Even the NRA admits it's bullshit

>> No.4432242

>>4431384
>Government is powerful enough to send a helicopter after you to blow up your house
>why won't you give up your guns, guys?

>> No.4432243

>>4432221
>CDC
>Director appointed by Obama

Clinton tried the same thing back in the 90's it didn't mean shit then and it doesn't mean shit now.

>> No.4432244

>>4432231
>It takes a lot less time and physical effort to squeeze one finger than it does to swing an entire arm around.

Go back to your video games

>> No.4432247
File: 110 KB, 1280x719, 1332482847.yawnilutrova_img_0727.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432247

>>4432223
Who??

>>4432225
See Chicago
See Austin

See the statistics, right to carry places have significantly less crime.

>> No.4432248

>>4432235
>he's never seen that picture used in history books

How young are you?

>> No.4432249

>>4431403
Freud said fear of weapons is a sign of sexual pathology, you know. Who's wrong, the guy who compensates for his small dick, or the guy who's afraid of dicks?

>> No.4432251

>>4432240
i hope you're not posting that comic with the hope of it defending an anti-gun stance. Anybody who's gone to a range knows how pants-on-head-retarded that strip is.

>> No.4432252

>>4432240
That's the opposite of reality. Hunting weapons use larger ammunition than assault rifles. "Assault weapons" in fact generally refer to AR(5.56mm), AK(5.45mm) and surprisingly, .22LR which is the smallest widely used caliber of ammunition there is. It's fucking tiny. Assault weapons includes the tiniest least-effective round ever. That's how intelligently that reference is.

>> No.4432253

>>4432244
>swing an entire arm around
That's not how stabbing works, son.
>still doesn't know what melee range means

>> No.4432254
File: 76 KB, 500x496, Piers_profile_twitter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432254

>>4432031
This man provides me with more entertainment than the rest of the anti-gun crowd combined.

>> No.4432255

>>4432240
> Implying hunting rifles aren't more powerful

I swear this was made by a closet /k/omando just to hurt anti-fun fags

>> No.4432256

>>4432231
You don't seem to understand how defense of yourself works?
You use what you have.
If he's got the jump on me, he's got the jump on me.
Though, I, in this scenario, have a gun.
I'm going to try to use it to make him stop before I'm dead.

This isn't like a videogame and I suddenly can't use ranged weapons simply because the other guy entered "melee range."

>> No.4432257

>>4432241

Look again, there's three separate studies there.

And Hemenway's study has the lowest number for defensive gun use.

>> No.4432259

>>4432240
Oh boy I sure hope that was posted as a joke.

>> No.4432261
File: 310 KB, 1024x768, 1331449271770.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432261

>>4432195
crimes happen dude, in places where guns are heavily restricted. That guy speeks the truth.

I like how these wanna chef Ramseys are trying to discredit people who actually talk about guns every day, and know the facts and statistics inside and out. Its honeslty laughable. I can't even take this thread seriously anymore.

>> No.4432263

>>4432202

God you're dumb. Terrorism has never won a war. It's nothing to do with honor. The weak resort to terrorism because the contest is so asymmetric. It's ineffective in winning a war or as an existential threat to any nation. If it wasn't, Israel would be long gone.

And no, I won't have a revolution on my hands with dumb. I'll have a few Ruby Ridges and Wacos, and a cleaner gene pool for it. Meanwhile most gunfags will grudingly accept it and find other things to focus their paranoia on.

Which is all meaningless anyways, as nobodies proposing a ban.

>> No.4432265

>>4432247

You in the photo. Your trip is Engie and the name of that file is iamanengineer.

>> No.4432266

>>4431434
>>4431422
>>4431409
>>4431407
>>4431403
>muh dick
>muh dick
>you're a pussy
>lololol white trash
>muh dick
Are you a nigger, son?

>> No.4432268

>>4432205

Faggot, prevention of potential harm is part of the social contract. Your right to stockpile arms ends where my right to not be massacred by crazy people begins.

>> No.4432269

>>4432195
>wanting to protect me and my family
>THIS RAMPANT PARANOIA BLARRGH!!

>> No.4432270

>>4432256
He's a foot away from you, he's stabbing you, you're firing from the hip because you can't extend the arm and aim properly, even if you manage to hit anything but your own foot you're still pretty much fucked.

>> No.4432271

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22066082

strict gun control at work

>> No.4432272

>>4432233
>Who's going to want to supply military equipment to them, with the possibility of US military retaliation?
>China, the godless commies who we trade with?
>Russia?
>The Saudis, who buy their equipment from us?
Yes, if the investment looks good.

Organized crime like the Crips and Zetas, etc, do it all the time in America on a smaller scale, even if they have to go from Mexico on up by foot.

A collected rebellion willing to take these arms would take them (duh) if it wants to continue fighting. A nation selling them would sell them however it could and would most likely get away with it because it has the logistical planning to get away with it.

Except Norinco, because they got greedy.

>> No.4432273
File: 76 KB, 640x480, 1221200587.soron1991_p1030484.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432273

>>4432253
Guns kill more efficiently then knives, and knife counters are mostly fantasy.

>Defending Yourself against a Knife Attack - Fantasy vs Reality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j55d8uqvKDQ&list=FL9twITR_niaFH8ICf5Gm3mw&index=27

>> No.4432274

>>4432230

So your gun doesn't stop crime. So why do you have it then?

>> No.4432276
File: 206 KB, 361x361, too old for this shit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432276

>>4432265

>> No.4432277

>>4432270
If he's within stabbing range it's kind of impossible to miss. Imagine stabbing someone back with the blunt end of a pistol only it's shooting fireballs and hot lead. You still get stabbed, but he gets his internal organs rearranged with hundreds of joules worth of gas and bullets.

>> No.4432278

>>4432180
what is syria, what is Libya, what is everything in the middle east.

>> No.4432279

>>4432273
must be nice in suburbia

>> No.4432280

>>4432268
>I want to take away your rights because I'm afraid of insane people
No.

>> No.4432281

>>4432269
>"wanting" and "actually being capable of" are the same, right?
>how do i follow thread to avoid entirely unrelated blather?

>> No.4432282

>>4432268
>your rights end where my feelings begin

you CAN NOT be this retarded

>> No.4432283
File: 985 KB, 500x333, tumblr_m2v5tuFUnJ1r53piwo1_500.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432283

All I wanted to do was to talk about food.
But no, >>4431403 had to make sure no one notices his sexual incompetence by saying other people are overcompensating by defending themselves.

Where's the fucking food?

>> No.4432284
File: 312 KB, 900x1200, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432284

>>4432248
>pic related

>> No.4432285

>>4432261
>that pic

I'd be jealous if they weren't furfags, but instead I'm sad. Sad that those kinds of people have that.

>> No.4432287

>>4432121
Private property as in land. As in, "this is my land; I can drive a car without a license on it". Context, guy. Context.

>> No.4432289

>>4432274
So his gun doesn't cause crime. So why do you ban it then?

>> No.4432290

>>4432276

How often do you fursuit?

>> No.4432291
File: 102 KB, 1280x719, 1332481559.yawnilutrova_img_0695.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432291

>>4432270
see >>4432273
also a knife is longer then a handgun. Even longer if you factor your stroke.

>> No.4432292

>>4432272

The Crips don't have armor. Neither do the cartels. Sure, they can supply ammo and assault weapons. My exact point is that doesn't do shit as far as revolution against a modern army. A single helicopter squadron could take down your entire army otherwise.

>> No.4432293
File: 605 KB, 2592x1936, 1364074401321.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432293

>>4432283

>> No.4432294

IF YOU ARE ANTI-GUN READ THIS


History lesson for you liberals that are afraid of inanimate objects.

-We have an individual right to own guns unconnected with milita service. Anyone saying you "have to be part of a milita" is completely wrong.

This is supported historically, factually and further up held by the Supreme Court in D.C. v. Heller
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html

-The "well regulated" part of the Second Amendment does not call for strict regulation of guns or can be used for you to push whatever anti-gun agenda you support. "Well regulated" meant disciplined, or trained, and was referring to the readiness of a milita for action. This meaning is upheld by the SC, and supported historically in Federalist No. 46, authored by James Madison our father of the Constitution.
Also the Second Amendment is the only Amendment to include "shall not be infringed". The founders did not want us to lose this right and clearly supported private gun ownership. British confiscation of arms was a huge catalyst for the Revolutionary War.
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fed_46.html

-When the founders wrote the constitution they only had muskets therefore you should only have a musket!

This logic is so flawed and completely wrong. If the founders intended for you to only own a musket they would have stated so in the Second Amendment. Instead, they choose to use the word "Arms" in describing our right to keep and bear arms. Knowing full well that guns would evolve. Also, look up the Puckle gun, and Belton Flintlock. These were multishot guns in existence during the 17th century, and even offered to the Continental Congress in 1777.
In summary, there is an individual right to own guns. The Second Amendment is not about hunting or muskets.

Theres a fuck load of other points i want to make but don't want to type out.

>> No.4432295
File: 120 KB, 615x445, 10mm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432295

>>4432240

>> No.4432296
File: 22 KB, 320x365, 1312747733440.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432296

>>4432243
>The government is right only when I agree with it.
Stop it. The studies are out there, and they predominately point to pro-gun stances.
>BUT MUH NANNY STATE
>INBRED RACIST
>REDNECK
>CHILLUNS
>PENISES!!!11!!
There, I outlined a good chunk of just about every anti-gun argument. Notice something?
Oh.. they are all emotional argument to pander to emotionally controlled individuals who have zero critical thinking ability and rely on others for everything in their life and usually lack a real sense of self-responsibility.
>pic related, you

>> No.4432297

>>4432277
And yet real life accounts say you don't even feel getting shot until some time after the fact. He's still stabbing you, you're still fucked.

>> No.4432298

>>4432268

Actually, no it doesn't. My right to stockpile arms DOESN'T end. But i don't stockpile arms. I have 2 guns, go to the range weekly, and teach a hunter safety course for my county once a month. You do NOT get to say where my rights end, because they do not infringe on your own.

You want to talk about rampant paranoia, like most of this thread has? YOU are the paranoid one.

>> No.4432299
File: 418 KB, 499x320, 1366738858313.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432299

>>4432274
see
>>4431494

>> No.4432300

>>4432281
Yeah, so hard, right? Might as well hand them my baby, too. Not a chance to defend myself at all.

>> No.4432301

>>4432270
>you can't extend the arm and aim properly
He's also a foot away from me and stabbing me. I'm grabbing the last six inches of the muzzle (if it's a rifle) and jamming it into him to fire if I need to (because, yes, he's stabbing me). If I can't get it against him, I've got a metal club that will fire once I get some room.
If I've got a pistol, I'm hugging that fucker and shooting him wherever I can get my wrist to turn into his body (because he's stabbing me, but thank god, I have a gun).

It's like you're pretending that if someone's trying to kill you, you suddenly stop trying whatever it takes to defend yourself because they get the first hit and advantageous position.

>> No.4432302

>>4432268
i'm screencapping this, this is too stupid to not share

>> No.4432303

>>4432293
Oh god, /k/ I love you.

>> No.4432304

>>4432295
Sides have left the premises.

>> No.4432305

>>4432278

I'm sorry, which of those were successful again?

Oh right, Libya. Which had air support from NATO, against a piss poor military.

And you're intending to instead rebel without air support against the most powerful military in world history.

Awesome. Let me know when so I can enlist for the turkey shoot.

>> No.4432306

>>4432274
>So your gun doesn't stop crime.
>>Though, IF I should need to, it's there.

>> No.4432310
File: 80 KB, 865x427, 48441b8a53fb234219a790a6ba8201c3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432310

>9,000 murders with firearms per year in the US
>400,000 crimes prevented with firearms per year in the US

Where's the beef

>> No.4432311

>>4432297
and he's still dying.

>> No.4432312

>>4432282

Right - your need to feel protected by a gun trumps my right not to be shot, and it's my feelings. Faggot.

>> No.4432316

>>4431446
wow you're a fucking racist

>> No.4432317

>>4432273
So your video tells me it's impossible to defend yourself from a knife, and yet you claim a gun would protect you? Cool story, bro.

>> No.4432318

>>4432268
>your rights end where my feelings begin!

oh, so my right to eat red meat should stop because a vegan lives next door? no, that would be fucking stupid.

Just like it would be fucking stupid to say i can't own a nice rifle to take to the range on a nice day because you're to stupid to not think that it's going to grow legs, run to your house, and shoot you in the face. I'M not about to kill you for no reason. You don't get to say what i can and can't own.

>> No.4432319
File: 129 KB, 1280x719, 1332812115.sako223_3gun.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432319

>>4432292
So shooting schools and hospitals is ok for the government? You can have a government if you kill your own followers in mass. Your people will over throw you. Also there are 2 million in reserve, fighting forces for the US. There are 300 million citizens total. And a helicopter can't stand on a street corner and enforce curphew.

>> No.4432320
File: 28 KB, 636x426, amtk_274.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432320

>>4432285

Yeah. Furfags pls go.

>> No.4432321

>>4432157
>You realize most of those "deaths" are actually suicides by firearms, right?
No, that chart shows homicides.

>> No.4432322

>>4432312
>my right not to be shot

that already exists actually.

>> No.4432323

Some friends and I went to a concert in a bad neighborhood once. While trying to get back on the freeway, we our car was sideswiped by two black women in a Mercedes trying to pass on a double yellow. We pulled over to exchange information, and called the police. In the meantime, a group of 10 or so black men came around the corner, a few of them carrying baseball bats. After a brief argument with the women about who was at fault, my friends retreated to the car, locked the door, and phoned police once again. Soon our car was surrounded by the black men who had come around the corner moments earlier, and they wasted no time in beating on the car, breaking out the driver's side window, and busting through the rear windshield, attempting to drag my friend (the driver) as well as my girlfriend at the time out of the car. We got the hell out of there, even though we were fleeing the scene of an accident, and headed home while we swore we were being followed.

During the altercation (which lasted around 15 minutes) we called the police three times, with no results. Even after getting back to our side of town, our attempt to flag down a cop and have him follow us to make sure that we -weren't- being followed by the cars we saw on the freeway was met with laughter and dismissal.

Now I have a gun. I, along with my friends who were in that car, are now taking a CPL course so we can adequately defend ourselves in a future situation. I have been attacked, I have feared for my life, and I did wish that I had something that would even the playing field against 10 angry black men with baseball bats. I don't give a fuck what insinuations you want to make about my "manhood" or mental state for wanting to own or carry a gun. I refuse to remain defenseless in a world that is as threatening as this one.

>> No.4432324

>>4432297
It's kind of hard to stay on your feet when your spinal cord is severed, isn't it? I should think so, considering it is the connection from your brain to your legs and back.

>> No.4432326
File: 255 KB, 354x367, 1364256753151.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432326

>>4432268
>prevention of potential harm is part of the social contract
Well then why in the fuck are you disabling the defense, chief?
Even Marx knows your shit is pants on head retarded.

>> No.4432327

>>4432311
And the gun still hasn't "protected" you. You're still fucked.

>> No.4432328

>>4432293
You don't NEED a hotdog

30k people choke on hot dogs a year, why would you risk it

>> No.4432330

>>4432312
Correct. My right to own a gun DOESN'T end because some nigger and his gang decided to break into your house. Maybe you should have owned a gun and at least tried to defend yourself.

>> No.4432331

>>4432298

Hmmm, kids in Sandy Hook seem lie their rights might be infringed just a little.

Unless you're claiming that crazy fucks are somehow due process? Is that it, my little wannabe constitutional scholar? Hint:there's more than 2 amendments!

>> No.4432332

>>4432316
wow you are a fucking retard who is a gun nut. Have fun when your hobby becomes outlawed.

>> No.4432335

>>4432327
>Implying I don't know how to shoot
>Implying you have to feel death before it happens

keep reaching

>> No.4432336

>>4432317
A gun will not necessarily protect you from being stabbed. A gun will protect you from being stabbed for a longer period of time than it takes to stab them back with bullets. They'll be shot, you'll be stabbed. That's the best you're going to get, and it's a shitload better than them not being shot.

>> No.4432338

>>4432306

Oh, in that case I want to have a nuclear weapon, in case I feel I need it. OK?

>> No.4432339

>>4432312
that's absolutely correct. just because jemal shot you, doesn't mean you can take away my ability to own a gun

>> No.4432340

>>4432298
>You want to talk about rampant paranoia, like most of this thread has? YOU are the paranoid one.
10/10

>> No.4432342

>>4432312
cool loose association bro

>> No.4432343
File: 157 KB, 640x509, klansman_M1C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432343

>>4432332

>> No.4432345
File: 121 KB, 615x445, 1361070564080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432345

>>4432295
>not using the real one

Sorry I'm a fuddy-five kinda guy.

>> No.4432348

>>4432319
I wonder what costs more, the SCAR or fursuit?

>> No.4432349

>>4431616
>Colorado has very gun friendly laws
uhhh...no......

>> No.4432350

>>4432200
He was citing gunfacts.info all sources are cited

You have given no credible source for your feeling parade bullshit

>> No.4432352

>>4432300
>believing guns make me invincible is completely rational

>> No.4432353

>>4432338
I don't think weapons that inflict mortal wounds to yourself, your family, your neighborhood, and anyone who walks into the area for the next 50k years counts as a weapon so much.... but on principle, yes.

>> No.4432354

>>4432318

Sure I do, just like you get to say I can't fuck 5 year olds.

Nobodies proposing taking your precious little rifle from you billy. Requiring a background check and closing gun slow loopholes doesn't do shit for that, so keep your pathetic hobby.

>> No.4432356
File: 34 KB, 313x289, scarecrow_oz.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432356

>>4432338
that's not a firearm, nor is it effective against home invasions.

>> No.4432357

>>4432305
syria actually. so much to the gov is begging for help.

and libya with a piss poor people and minimal air support.

lol 30 missiles

>> No.4432358

>>4431530
Holy shit, man. Just holy shit. I couldn't live with that shitty of a computer. You've got to be fucking trolling.

>> No.4432359

>>4432292
>My exact point is that doesn't do shit as far as revolution against a modern army. A single helicopter squadron could take down your entire army otherwise.
A single helicopter did real well against the entire force of Al-Qaeda. Oh, wait, they didn't gather in one spot or do a Tet Offensive, because they'd get slaughtered. They proceeded to fuck with us for 10 years.
As well, they didn't need armor; they didn't need to occupy a place so much as push out invaders. Armor would have gotten them slaughtered; they DID get access to what they needed to attack armor in the form of bombs and anti-armor weaponry.

What you don't understand of the 2nd Amendment's potential is not for revolution. It was to protect the one ostensibly won should the government ever stop being of the people, by the people, and for the people in a Declaration of Independence Grievances-tier situation.

It's there to give a fighting chance and hold out as soon as possible until the counter-revolution can be stopped or fail. Without guns, there's no chance.

>> No.4432360

>>4432331
Everyone gets due process. That may be unfortunate in some cases, but yeah, they do.

>> No.4432361

>>4432305
>You shouldn't be allowed to own guns because you may be crazy
>Let me know so I can massacre American citizens
Stop projecting your insanity upon an upstanding and responsible public, shitbag.

>> No.4432363

>>4432305
>most powerful army in world history

sounds like 1774 all over again

>> No.4432364

>>4432331
actually, yes, they do get due process. where were you even going with that? are you saying because a nutcase stole a gun and shot kids, my rights should be taken away? that would be stupid.

>> No.4432365

>>4432322

Exactly my point. Your right to own a gun conflicts with the rights of others, in that having loose gun laws is more likely to interfere with my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit.

>> No.4432366
File: 73 KB, 640x512, P6240131.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432366

>> No.4432367
File: 67 KB, 1020x615, 1345724731936.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432367

>>4432327
>let's make up a "what if" self-defense situation and pass it as every example of what a real situation would be

>> No.4432369

>>4432297
And I'm going to keep shooting until he stops and I get a chance to call the hospital and stabilize myself.
Why do you keep pretending that self-defense cannot happen once someone is already attacking you?

>> No.4432370

>>4432343
yes the republican KKK with their gun control. Your hobby will die out in a few generations.

You cant even give a gun to your kids without a background check now in Colorado, when you die you cant inherit a gun without a background check.
Face it your hobby will be extinct in less than 100 years except in the most rural parts of this nation.

>> No.4432373
File: 81 KB, 960x720, 1334424650.iamanengineer_563335_10150711883403463_791498462_9582381_2038928277_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432373

>>4432336
I want to meat the PCP crazed stabman you are talking about. If you place a shot center chest he's going down. He'll keel over if you ventilate his head.

Gunshot > Stap

how is this even an argument

>> No.4432374

>>4432365
My right to own a gun conflicts with nobody else on the planet, unless I decide to break laws to infringe upon their rights. Sorry but my NRA T-shirt doesn't kill babies either.

>> No.4432375
File: 153 KB, 297x333, Faye_disbelief.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432375

>>4432354
>Requiring a background check
But they're already there, you dummkopf.

>closing gun slow loopholes
They don't even exist. The only loophole is if your neighbor sold you their gun, which even a national gun registry wouldn't even fix and is more than likely illegal currently.

>> No.4432376
File: 340 KB, 670x545, ak47_5a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432376

>>4432343

>> No.4432377

>>4432365
No it doesn't, because I and 100million other gun-owning Americans have never shot a person.

>> No.4432378

>>4432356
Yea and a M16 isn't a musket. You have no right to threaten the lives of children just so you can get off on "muh freedoms"

>> No.4432379
File: 9 KB, 184x184, scout helmet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432379

>this whole thread

how about we agree to disagree because arguing over the internet isn't going to change anyone's opinions

>> No.4432380

>>4432335
>the gun protects me from getting stabbed
>if he stabs me and then I shoot him the gun still protects me from getting stabbed
>it will protect me retroactively

Keep reaching.

>> No.4432381

>>4432330

How many gangs have broken into your house? None.

Nor mine. Stop defending your hobby with hypotheticals that just show your neurosises.

>> No.4432382
File: 174 KB, 1024x768, Photo1320.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432382

>> No.4432384
File: 377 KB, 1200x900, IMG_20130428_145315.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432384

I'm a little late to the party, aren't I?

Can I still entertain you a little?

>> No.4432385

>>4432354
i don't say you can't fuck five year olds. their parents say that. it's also not your constitutional right to fuck five year olds.

>> No.4432386

>>4432354
>gun slow loopholes

wait, is this a new trendy phrase without meaning or are you referring to an already existing trendy phrase that has no meaning?

>> No.4432388

>>4432365
>Your right to own a gun conflicts with the rights of others
Wrong. Me owning a gun and threatening to kill you or actually killing you would be violating your rights.
>in that having loose gun laws is more likely to interfere with my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit.
Is your right to life, liberty and the pursuit (of happiness) more important than mine? Because that's the argument your making.

>> No.4432389
File: 311 KB, 500x493, 1366858168644.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432389

>>4432166

>> No.4432391

>>4432367
Funny, that's exactly what all gunfag arguments boil down to.

>> No.4432392

>This thread
Nigga I just wanted to talk about sammiches

>> No.4432393

>>4432327
But it has protected my wife and three children. Someone who's just taken 3 bullets to the chest is not going to drag their bleeding ass upstairs to rape and murder them now.

>> No.4432394

>>4432268
>my right to not be massacred by crazy people
Well, he's not crazy or using his plethora of guns against you. As far as the social contract goes, you're oppressing him for NOT oppressing you.

In America we're innocent until we're proven guilty. Was he literally brandishing his guns against particularly you?
No?
Then you were more or less safe, your right to live uninfringed.

>> No.4432395

>>4432373
Well they've already placed PCP-stabman within a foot of me. I obviously didn't see him coming. Center mass would only be GUARANTEED to stop him if it severed his spinal cord, honestly.

Drugs are bad, drug users are sometimes bad. Guns are neutral, gun owners go either way.

>> No.4432396
File: 8 KB, 275x183, tali.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432396

>>4432305
>he thinks war is 2 sides. LOLLOL you'll be shot from 360 degrees. you have no idea how guerrilla warfare works.

pic related its mfw you get blow up by a bomb a guy made in his basement out of a pressure cooker.

>> No.4432397

>>4432310
Fucking this.

>> No.4432398

>>4432379
Too bad you're dealing with libtards here. They WILL hammer their feelings and personal opinions until you choke on them.

>> No.4432399

>>4432378
M16 is military arms, just like a musket was military arms. Arms being the key and protected word. You arm a military with this? It's your protected right to carry it.

>> No.4432400
File: 821 KB, 362x222, government and wall street.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432400

>>4432338
you got enough money for it? nobodys going to mess with you with that kind of deterrence

>> No.4432402

>>4432389
How am I frustrated?

>> No.4432403

>>4431303
Except guns prevent 1.5 million violent crimes annually, not counting the unreported instances that just brandishing a sidearm scared an assailant/rapist/whatever shitless and sent them running.

You're literally spouting unsourced opinions in a gun debate, and you seem obsessed with penis size. Why are leftists always so obsessed with penis size?

>> No.4432404

>>4432378
That's not even ad hominem I don't think.

guys, which fallacy is it when some retard says I did something i didn't do?

>> No.4432405

>>4432359

And with just rifles there's no chance, my point exactly. Stop pretending a .22 is a check on government, because it's not.

You mention the Taliban's anti-armor weaponry, which is my point exactly. Without real support your best case scenario is Ruby Ridge. How'd that turn out again?

>> No.4432406

>>4432393
>3 bullets
That's a very specific number.What if you don't manage to hit him 3 times?

>> No.4432407

>>4432381
>Not mine
>So no one else!
lel

>> No.4432408

>>4432378
So what you're saying is that only citizens of the United States of America should be able to own a musket and ONLY a musket for the protection of their home, sport, and domestic threats.

Okay. Gotcha. I'm drowning in stupidity now.

>> No.4432409

>>4432378
> Implying civilians own M16's

>> No.4432410

>>4432348
Surprisingly, a fursuit. Some of those bitches are in upwards of $4,000+.

I wonder if the one with the SCAR is Squid.

>> No.4432411

>>4432361

Oh, right, there's no massacres in the US with guns, it's just me.
Sorry.

>> No.4432412

>>4432403
>guns prevent 1.5 million violent crimes annually
[citation needed]

>> No.4432413

>>4432354
>background checks
>pathetic hobbies

I don't call your hobbies pathetic. I don't aspire to be a 5-star chef, captain /ck/. I also don't pretend to know what it would require to be one.
So you should extend the same courtesy. You obviously don't know a whole lot about the bill they tried to pass to "close" loopholes, so it would be best for you to not talk about it like you DO know what would be best for gun owners, who have shooting as a hobby.

Also, fucking 5 year olds? Really?

>> No.4432414

>>4432367
why not talk to me? a guy where a "what if" became "holy shit its happening"

>> No.4432416
File: 356 KB, 1200x900, IMG_20130428_145609.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432416

>>4432384

(2/2)

>> No.4432417

>>4432381
not everyone lives in wealthy neighborhoods with a private police force nearby.

>> No.4432418

>>4432370

Back in the day the South voted Democrat and the North voted republican. The whole situation with that is really, really long story which isn't /k/ or /ck/ related. I'm a centrist who thinks both parties (and the Libertarians) are full of shit.

Anyway, gun control was a major part of the Jim Crow Laws and Black Codes.

>> No.4432419

>>4432367
>>4432391
Gunfag arguments are required to pass one check: Did the government, upon its creation, say they could touch my guns?

There's only one answer. The rest is quibbling and illegal laws and attempted fascism and liberal tears.

>> No.4432421

>>4432121
you must have the reading comprehension of a pre-school kid. he was stating that you can have a vehicle and operate that vehicle on one's premises without the requirement of insurance or drivers license or a license plate. so you can have a 11yr old driver a bugatti veryon at 200mph on your personal track and the fed/state govt cant do shit but suck your dick.

so if you can buy a car without the need for licensure why is that then a possible requirement for firearms when most of them are used on personal property?

>> No.4432422

>>4432354
>gun show loop hole
There is no "loophole". What you are referring to is a private sale. When you put no effort into understanding the argument and don't research things for yourself it makes you look dumb.

Also still trying to stereotype gun owners as "redneck". Millions of Americans from all walks of life own guns.

Why do you not own a gun yet?

>> No.4432423

>>4432364

No shithead, your argument seems to imply that the psycho is due process, which he is obviously not.

>> No.4432424

>>4432406
>doesn't know shit about how guns work
>still feels like he knows his shit

>> No.4432425
File: 28 KB, 500x500, 1361672984035.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432425

>>4432370
>yes the republican KKK
Sweetie, those were democrats. How about we put down the propaganda and pick up a history book?

>> No.4432426

>>4432379
But muh feelings

>> No.4432427
File: 41 KB, 400x300, s6640_P7276296.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432427

>> No.4432428

>>4432391
>You may not be able to defend yourself with a gun so you shouldn't own one
>A seatbelt may not save your life so you shouldn't wear one
You wot m8?

>> No.4432429

>>4432384

>>canned mint jelly

GTFO

>> No.4432430

>>4432352
No one said invincible.

>what is fallacy of false dilemma

>> No.4432431

>>4432378
You know the repeating rifle was invented around the same time as the Constitution was signed. Though it didn't catch on for almost a hundred years, it existed. So don't give me the bullshit of "hurr durr they didn't have the firepower!"

>> No.4432432

>>4432370
the kkk were democrats retard lrn2history.

>10/10 trolling btw

>> No.4432433

>>4432411
> Implying anecdotes mean anything

If they did, we can make an argument to appeal every fucking amendment on the books.

>> No.4432434

>>4432424
>not answering the question
>pretending to have a point

>> No.4432435

>>4432406
That's what my assault clips are for.

>> No.4432436

>>4432411
Just because you want to kill people doesn't mean that people who own firearms do.
>>4432305
>Let me know when so I can enlist for the turkey shoot
Your fucking words.

>> No.4432437
File: 166 KB, 1340x545, 1367001483917.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432437

>> No.4432439

>>4432430
>how i follow the thread

>> No.4432440

>>4432388
>Me owning a gun and threatening to kill you or actually killing you would be violating your rights.

That threat is implicit. It's the reason, unless you're a skeet shooter or hunter, you own a gun. The purpose of a handgun is shooting people, it has no other.

>> No.4432441

>>4431380
The AR-15 "assault rifle" is one of the most common rifles used in shooting competitions, mainly for 1) the round it shoots 2) the design of the gun and 3) the negligible recoil. Learn to facts.

>> No.4432442

>>4432378
>m16
>musket
why are people so fucking dumb?

>> No.4432443
File: 96 KB, 960x720, 1334424885.iamanengineer_521631_10150711884003463_791498462_9582383_852043330_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432443

>>4432412
>[citation needed]
Guns prevent an estimated 2.5 million crimes a year or 6,849 every day. Often
the gun is never fired and no blood (including the criminal’s) is shed.

Targeting Guns, Dr. Gary Kleck, Criminologist, Florida State University, Aldine, 1997

>> No.4432445

>>4432370
Abraham Lincoln
Best Democrat ever. Long live zee party.

>> No.4432446

>>4432404
>>4432404
I believe it's the "retardabitur faecem" fallacy.

>> No.4432447

>>4431338
The presence of a gun increases the likelihood of somebody being shot the very sane way the presence of pants in a household increases the likelihood you won't be leaving pantsless. That statistic is a fucking political parlor trick, you idiots, why aren't you ever questioning anything anyone tells you? Do you need a dick up your ass that badly?

Someone post more sammich, please.

>> No.4432449

>>4432434
I think the point that Anon was trying to make is that if you are not educated on the subject you have no right to talk about it.

Or would you be willing to "bend" that right as well?

>> No.4432451

>>4432440
You ARE aware that there are handgun target shooting competitions, right?

>> No.4432452

/ck/ it is utterly astounding how shitty your reasoning is and how rife with appeals to emotion your arguments are. Oh well given the sheer amount of shitposting there is normally I should have guessed that this thread would have been a shit show. You people are totally retarded collectivist scum.

>> No.4432453
File: 31 KB, 357x257, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432453

>>4432443
>these people own guns

>> No.4432454

>>4432378
Who said anything about muskets?
Technically in the U.S. of A. black powder weapons are not firearms. So what exactly does the 2nd amendment do if "muskets" aren't actually firearms.

Also, you don't get to decide what I use to defend my family.

>> No.4432456

>>4432447
Disregard, I ignored the rest of your post, I'm sorry...

>> No.4432457

>>4432441
>AR 15
>assault rifle
Stop.

>> No.4432458
File: 411 KB, 1224x1632, 1358059906288.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432458

>>4432429

It's hard being new.

>> No.4432459

>>4432440
>That threat is implicit.
Fucking what?
Are you saying that someone owning a gun means they are threatening to kill you?

>> No.4432461
File: 1.03 MB, 1816x1792, 1366676579510.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432461

>>4432453
>don't know that furries run /k/

>> No.4432462

>>4432440
>The purpose of a handgun is shooting people, it has no other.

correct. Is there something wrong with that?

>> No.4432463

>>4432421

Except, you know, when they're not. Times like Aurora, Columbine, Virginia Tech, etc. So your argument makes no sense.

Are you saying I should have the right to create fissable uranium without regulation, as long as its on private property?

>> No.4432464

>>4432457
He's on your side you fucking retard, it's in quotes jesus christ tripfags

>> No.4432466
File: 33 KB, 400x300, tittes and spam.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432466

>> No.4432467

>>4432453
>no argument
>time for ad hominems

>> No.4432468
File: 51 KB, 720x542, 156df_2a98.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432468

>>4432453
>babyfurs

lol

>> No.4432469

>>4432457
Go away 9mm, he put it in brackets for a reason. Just go. Fuck.

>> No.4432470

>>4432443
Thanks, /k/ompatriot.

>> No.4432473

>>4432428
>pro-gun arguments are violence porn wankery
>HURR DURR WHY NOT BAN SEATBELTS THEN
Logic.

>> No.4432474

>>4432378
>Yea and a M16 isn't a musket.
That's like pretending a musket can't kill a single person. That's like pretending it can't kill up to five before the police get there five minutes later at a reload of 1 shot/minute or the time it takes for someone figuring out that someone died after someone had the gall to shoot a black powder gun at someone.

Even during the Colonial Era they had multi-shot weapons that were more or less identical to the M16. Why? Because they had more than one shot, and could kill people.
They simply weren't known yet because standarized parts and mass production to make them not-absurdly-expensive hadn't come to be yet (Ben Franklin was working on the former).

The Cookson repeater held 14 shots that could be fired in two sets of seven semi-automatic.
During the Revolution itself the British had their allied force with early snipers with a 20+ shot air rifle.

>> No.4432475

>>4432256

Don't try to argue with a retard, you'll only look retarded yourself. If Mr. Derpington thinks that it takes more time to put about a pound of force on a trigger, than it does to swing a 7-10 pound arm holding a 6-9 inch knife, while lunging 12 inches to close the distance between you two, then let him believe his nonsense.

>> No.4432476

>>4432458
you're on CK, maybe that means something else here?

>> No.4432477

>>4432434
Go learn some gun physics. Or handle one, shoot a bit and see how your argument falls. Come on, it won't bite.

>> No.4432478

>>4432464
Referring to the AR as an assault rifle is wrong no matter which side.

>> No.4432479
File: 199 KB, 1104x712, P9288410h.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432479

>> No.4432481

>>4432422

I own 2, which were gifts, so check your assumptions. And the gun show loophole is exactly that - a loophole that allows sales of guns at shows to be classified as private sales, and no longer need background checks.

Why is that even an issue? To say that you cannot buy a gun without a background check, period?

>> No.4432482

>>4432440
Im so sorry you are so afraid of inanimate objects. People owning guns is not a implied threat against your life, you need to accept that and come back into reality.

You are ignoring the whole right to self-defense which is why millions of Americans own guns. Evil is very present in our society. Evil is most likely not even in your frame of reference but for millions of other Americans it is. Sorry we bought a handgun to defend our families with, we couldn't afford the 24/7 armed guards and gated community.

>> No.4432483

>>4432404
Fallacy of Irrelevant Standard

>> No.4432484

>>4432478
It was in quotes, you "heterosexual"

>> No.4432485

>>4432478
See
>>4432469

And GTFO

>> No.4432486

>>4432453
check your privilege

>> No.4432487

>>4432381
>How many gangs have broken into your house? None.
Yes, thank god. Though if they choose to for whatever reason, I've got a gun to make them choose another house.
They can head to yours, since you don't feel you're responsible enough for a gun. It's your right to choose whether to have one or not for whatever reason.
So is it mine.

>> No.4432488

>>4432463
>create fissable uranium

what?

>> No.4432489

>>4432454

>black powder weapons legally not firearms

Yeah, that's just bullshit

>> No.4432491

>>4432473
>pro-gun arguments are violence porn wankery

not the guy you're responding to, but way to cherry-pick the thread. maybe you should read more. there have been plenty of listed reasons to own a gun listed, including competition, sport, and job related reasons

>> No.4432492
File: 34 KB, 400x329, PB056836.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432492

>> No.4432493

>>4432449
I think the Anon is confusing the imaginary scenarios where he saves the day he keeps replaying in his head with "knowing shit."
That still doesn't answer the question or address the point so it's moot anyway and is just an attempt to sidetrack the discussion.

>> No.4432494

>>4432489
It's true
Felons cannot own firearms, but they can own black powder weapons because they are not classified as "modern firearms"

>> No.4432495

>>4431825
But this book contains dangerous material, you need to run a background check on the buyer.

>> No.4432497

>>4432406
That's what my Beretta 92 holds 15 rounds. You're grasping at straws and failing to see the point. Even ONE bullet will decrease their ability to function. I mentioned three bullets to prove a point.

>> No.4432499

>>4432489
No it's not you dumb shit a 5 second google search would have confirmed it.

>> No.4432500
File: 42 KB, 300x289, 300_84420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432500

>>4432441

Fucking retard. The AR-15 wasn't designed for target shooting any more than the M1 Garand was. The low recoil was part of the design parameters for a new US infantry rifle. The cartridges were specifically designed with human targets in mind. Later, when the market was flooded with them (much as the market was flooded with surplus Garands after the last big war), civilians noticed what the military knew all along.

It's amazing how delusional /k/ is about gun facts. I grew up in a red state and despite being surrounded by rednecks, I never knew such stupid people existed in real life until I spent some time on /k/. No wonder liberals look down on conservatives so badly. Seems all the smart ones stay off the internet.

>> No.4432501

>>4432473
>violence porn wankery
Really faggot?
>"WE SHOULD LET CRIMINALS VICTIMIZE US WITH NO OPPOSITION!"
>Two objects which on their own cause no problems and can protect their user
>Not logical

>> No.4432502

>>4432491
And of course... the right that cannot be infringed by any agency, body, person, or government. Human rights ftw.

>> No.4432503

>>4432462

>This

>> No.4432504

>>4432120
if you had people do that across the nation week after week after week it would shut the nation down. that would be 18.2 billion dollars + if that happened once a week for a year. imagine if someone did that in a major town like NYC, Houston, LA, San Fran, Dallas, Chicago, Miami. The numbers would be larger in those cities of cost because they have more people that wouldnt be able to leave their homes. less business around the country would happen as a result.

Case in point, the long beach/LA port shutdown. the sea port was shut down for 8 days as a result of union strikes. every single day that the port was closed it was 1 billion dollars of lost revenue because of the amount that comes in day after day. If you shut down all of LA to look for 2 people the gdp would be impacted by it as a result of everything being ground down to a halt.

if that happened in houston or dallas it would wreak havoc on fuel prices with the huge refineries that are in place there.

>> No.4432505
File: 9 KB, 391x336, 1354487158826.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432505

MFW /k/ommandos have been called to the thread.

>>4432370
Hardly, maybe in California and New York, but in a vast majority of the country the firearms tradition is alive and strong. Also, the KKK was a bunch of Democrats up until the 60s then they started hating everyone because the Democrats caught up with society.

>>4432378
I don't threaten children, who has spread these lies to your young ears?

>>4432381
Because something bad has never happened to me it will never happen. Thats why I don't have health insurance.

So much libtard, so little time.

>> No.4432507

>>4432457
It was in quotes for a reason...it's called an sarcasm

>> No.4432511

>>4432477
>still avoiding the question
>still pretending to have a point
You still haven't explained how the number 3 comes from anywhere else but your imagination.

>> No.4432513

>>4432500
Actually... the AR15 was the civilian ownership model that was NOT designed solely for the military.

>> No.4432515

>>4432482

I'm not afraid of inanimate objects, you fatous shithead - I have a very valid concern over the owners of those items which have no purpose other than a threat to others.

The right of self-defense is (a) not a right listed anywhere in the 2nd amendment, and is (b) absolute bullshit that exists only as vigilante fantasies of pussies scared to fight

>> No.4432516
File: 311 KB, 580x758, 1285883430.foxglove_img_1212.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432516

>>4432488
What is "Nuclear Proliferation" for 2000

also to synthesize enough U-235 from 238 for a nuclear warhead would set you back millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of man hours to do it by yourself. See you in 50 years faggot, in a gulag.

>> No.4432518

I like this thread.

>> No.4432519
File: 97 KB, 259x329, 1361138839195.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432519

>>4432489

b-but it's true...

also
>sure is piers morgan in here

>> No.4432520
File: 82 KB, 611x689, Untitled-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432520

>> No.4432521

>>4432378
I don't believe any gun owners on 4chan have ever-- or [will] ever-- threaten a child, and I don't believe any but a micro-subsect of gun-owning Americans would consider anything of the sort. Why on earth would you think of such a thing? That's horrible. You leftists and irrationalist anti-gunners are horrible.

>> No.4432522
File: 199 KB, 1391x406, 1355711944884.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432522

>>4431384

>> No.4432523

>>4432500
The AR-15 is civilian spec
They made a MilSpec variant of the platform after the fact and called it the M-16

>> No.4432524

>>4432482
>People owning guns is not a implied threat against your life,

Right, because handguns also help make risotto? The point of a gun is to kill. When people say it's for defense, what they're actually saying is they have the gun as a threat to potential aggressors.

>> No.4432526
File: 226 KB, 474x648, 1285893106.foxglove_img_1208.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432526

>>4432516
meant to reply to the other guy

>> No.4432528

>>4432505
Dont forget Colorado and connecticut. It will be only a matter of time before Washington and Oregon are added to the list.

>> No.4432530

>>4432500
HAHAHA get your own facts straight, first. The AR15 was not designed for military use.
And no surplus M4/M16s were ever converted to AR15s after the fact.

>> No.4432532

>>4432130
we should take cops firearms away if that is how it goes. i mean so what if the bogeymen is called, abu dallar, juan pena, johnny brown, or james smith.

>> No.4432533

>>4432487
>Though if they choose to for whatever reason, I've got a gun to make them choose another house.

Sorry bitch, but they haven't broken into mine either. Maybe you should stop jumping at shadows before you shoot a family member

>> No.4432534

>>4432515
>absolute bullshit that exists only as vigilante fantasies of pussies scared to fight

but that's completely wrong. there IS a right to self-defense. check your state constitution, bucko. read up, it may save your life

>> No.4432535
File: 360 KB, 2199x1258, 1360816681480.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432535

>>4432515
There's no such thing as "rights", just might. But try taking my "right" to self defense away and see how that goes.

>> No.4432536

>>4432494
no, you idiot. Black-powder is actually banned in some places, such as New Jersey and is still classified as a weapon everywhere.

Felons have to file for a petition before they can get one, and they can be easily denied.

>> No.4432537
File: 75 KB, 718x720, antiguns.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432537

Fuck this argument, it's simple:

If you don't like guns, move somewhere else. Freedom haters don't deserve US citizenship.

>> No.4432539

>>4432524
They have nothing to do with your life, in fact. Unless you are a violent criminal who is aggressive to them or someone else.... it doesn't have a goddamn thing to do with you or the babbies or Sandy Hook.

Believe it or not, the universe doesn't revolve around you, nor do you make any significant impact upon it. You don't control their lives any more than you control the sun or the moon. Deal with reality first, maybe see a shrink.

>> No.4432540

>>4432493
----->>4432477
That was my point, thank you.

>> No.4432541
File: 120 KB, 400x307, friendly neighborhood fighter jet patrol.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432541

>>4432522
>A FIGHTER JET IS USELESS FOR MAINTAINING A POLICE STATE

>> No.4432542

>>4432524

And there's something wrong with that?

>> No.4432543

>>4432515
>right to self defense doesn't exist

Well, I guess my state's castle laws and constitution are null and void just because you say so, huh?

>> No.4432544

>>4432481
Again, it is not a loophole.

We have always had private sales. You are acting like this is some sneaky trick people use to get around the law.

What guns do you own?

I support background checks, as does every other person. We have background checks already. However, "universal" background checks are unenforceable without a National gun registration which i very much oppose. Friends, family, neighbors and people in your community should be able to freely buy/trade/sell property without government interference as well.

>> No.4432545

>>4432513

1. You're wrong, you're confusing the military designation with a fundamental design difference
2. The lack of a full-auto sear has no bearing on the characteristics you cited

Again, facts. You might want to get more familiar with them in the future to avoid embarrasssment.

>> No.4432546

>>4432499
how about a citation instead.

inb4 yahoo answers

>> No.4432549

>>4432537
This. Or at least be honest and repeal the Bill of Rights instead of infringing on it everywhere.

>> No.4432550
File: 80 KB, 417x442, mustache.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432550

>>4432541
I wasn't ready for that. Thank you anon.

>> No.4432551

>>4432530
>The AR-15 was first built by ArmaLite as an assault rifle for the United States armed forces. [8] Because of financial problems, ArmaLite sold the AR-15 design to Colt. The select-fire version of the AR-15 entered the U.S. military system as the M16 rifle. Colt then started selling the semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle as the Colt AR-15 for civilian sales in 1963.[9]

>> No.4432552

>>4432515
>The right of self-defense is (a) not a right listed anywhere in the 2nd amendment
You're right, it is a fail safe to prevent govt tyranny, self defense is just a side benefit.
>>4432515
>absolute bullshit that exists only as vigilante fantasies of pussies scared to fight
It seems that you have the fallacious belief that everyone who is the victim of a crime is a spartan. I can assure you that criminals will always choose to victimize those they perceive as weaker.

>> No.4432553

>>4432405
The 2nd Amendment is there to protect the Revolution should it come to the point where enough people can get together to realize X-reason is worth rebelling against my once-countrymen.
It's there to hold out until goddamn they can get bigger than .22. With the 2nd in place, they can without needing to, skipping a step.

It's to hold out for if the populace will join if your cause is just/worth it or until the would-be oppressing force decides to back off.

If a single .22 was a check against the government, we wouldn't need the 2nd Amendment. A .22 we could cobble together out of piping and springs whenever the any person hurting me or ostensibly my liberty got uppity in the least.
It doesn't.

That's why the 2nd is there to say that firearms won't be infringed, not to the populace, but the government that would ostensibly govern the people (because it is for, of, and by the people).
It is not a right "given," it is an inherent right legally protected by the American government.

>> No.4432554
File: 7 KB, 450x320, 1320578902517.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432554

>>4432500
First off dummy the AR15 was an offshoot of the AR10 which was designed FOR CIVILIAN use.
Second the m16 was the mil version.
Third 5.56 was made to save weight and nothing more. Later it was adopted to the dominate choice it is today.

You know nothing. Please shut the fuck up.

>> No.4432555

>>4432545
In fact the way the military bids for weapons... civilian organizations propose variants of their products to which government tests and accepts offers. The AR was a line of rifles that existed previous to the 15 model and that was chosen to compete for government contracts.

>> No.4432556
File: 130 KB, 864x648, 1366957777553.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432556

>>4432536

nope, wrong again.

>> No.4432557

>>4432504

And that's very inconvinient. That's not enough to win a war, though as 9/11 showed it can be enough to start one. But it's not going to cause a change in government.

>> No.4432558

>>4432540
>not having a point
>that was my point
I see. That's what I was saying.

>> No.4432559

>>4432500
You realize that 5.56 isn't even designed to kill right?

>> No.4432561
File: 310 KB, 962x721, 1340996181639.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4432561

>>4432528
Thats true, its a shame.

Also since this is /ck/,

>> No.4432562

>>4432536
Not in Florida
Felons can buy black powder rifles should they wish

>> No.4432565

>>4432545
>fundamental design difference
full-auto was the fundamental design difference.

inb4 hurr durr 3 burst!

that's still automatic and falls within the same classification.

>But military origins!
by that logic gunpowder and silly puddy should be banned

>> No.4432566

>>4432511
And then we go back to this. ----->>4432449

>> No.4432567

>>4432546
Simple shit you dumb fuck took me 5 seconds

https://www.atf.gov/files/firearms/industry/0501-firearms-top-10-qas.pdf

>> No.4432568

>>4432462

In a philosophical sense? No. In the sense that therefore your right to own a handgun can conflict with my right to live? Yes. So to claim gun ownership is the only right in the argument is silly.

>> No.4432569

>>4431146
>having to bring a gun to work to feel safe

try putting yourself in a different pair of shoes for a split second

>being ready for any possible situation

Politicians, celebrities and other "VIPs" have armed guards. Why do you think its ok for them to bring a gun to work to feel safe but not everyone else.

>> No.4432570

>>4432442
/k/ assumes too much because it was born into it most of the time, or forgets they too were once new to guns.
I'm a relatively recent gunowner, and you guys need to step back and explain WHY the things obvious to us now aren't obvious to people who don't understand guns and still think they need to be registered or something similarly naiive/unimportant.

>> No.4432571

>>4432559
Please don't start that

>> No.4432572

>>4432554
>9mm telling people they know nothing
Ahahahaha good one.

>> No.4432573

>>4432528
Thought Washington was ok-tier for gun laws? Lived there as a child years ago. If anything I thought they were getting more lax.

As a whole I don't think it matters, most states will eventually end up becoming more lax once we put all these libs and dems in check. But that could be forever.

We just need to follow Alaskas and Lousisanas(?) law of charging any federal agent who tries to enforce federal law on weapons. Seriously, its up to the states to make their own laws about guns, not the feds. Stop the '34 and '86 enforcement too

>> No.4432574

>>4432559
That's actually a bullshit urban legend. It's not AS well designed to kill, but rather optimized to be carried in more plentiful amounts. It's designed to kill as well as you can WHILE carrying so many hundreds of rounds.

>> No.4432576

>Mfw this thread
>Mfw so many facts
>Mfw so many /k/omrades come together to stomp /ck/'s faggotry.
>Mfw it tastes like freedom
>Mfw I love each and every one of you /k/ommandos

>> No.4432577

>>4432533
>tfw anti-gun arguments are 100% implying and "what if" scenarios

>> No.4432579

>>4432540
>the fact that i will hit the opponent three times in a struggle without aiming is inherent in gun physics and behaviour OMG CLEARLY COU KNOW NOTHING OF GUNS IF YOU DON'T KNOW THAT
>why should I actually make a point when I can just dismiss everything
"Winning."

>> No.4432580

>>4432565
>>4432545
>>4432551
They AR was not marketed to the Military first.... Fucking damn.

>> No.4432582

Mother of god there's a shit ton of posts, I don't know if this argument has been said already...

>"Why do you own a gun for protection?"

Same reason you have a fire extinguisher in the kitchen.

>" Okay, but do you really need more than one gun?"

Same reason why you have more than one fire extinguisher, fires can happen in any room.

>"Okay.. but you have no reason to have an 'assault rifle'"

Then we might as well remove the fire hydrant from in front of your house.

>> No.4432583

>>4432551
did you read your own post before posting?

>> No.4432584

>>4432551
>comparing a select fire AR15 to civie AR15. Granted, I didn't know the original AR15 designation was 'for the military' so you got me there. Apologies.

>> No.4432585

>>4432558
>>4432511
Sorry, not going to spoon feed you basic gun physics. Ask other anon with more patience, maybe.

>> No.4432587

>>4432566
And we go back to >>4432434
This is fun.

>> No.4432588

>>4431380
>gun meant to hit things better
>not good at defending you

>> No.4432589

>>4432534
>gun owners are such pussies they, only fight with guns that I'm afraid of!

>> No.4432593

>>4432557
>And that's very inconvinient.
That's it
It's not about defeating the government, it's about making it so fucking costly that they don't want to play no more.

>> No.4432595

>>4432554

The AR-10, which had no commercial success whatsoever until the pattern was adapted for an intermediate cartridge, acquired and refined by the US military, and popularized through multiple wars.

And saying "the 5.56mm was designed to save weight and nothing more" leaves out something kind of critical: the entire premise of the cartridge was that it had the ideal combination of weight and power to allow more ammo to be carried, while still being powerful enough.

It was NOT designed to punch holes in paper, which was what the other guy was claiming.

>> No.4432596

>>4432580
what are you quoting me for? All I said is the full-auto is the only difference worth noting.

>> No.4432597

>>4432572
Yep, when you have people showing more stupidity than him, you definitely know something's wrong with them.

>> No.4432598

>>4432585
If you talk statistics, in ... maybe the 90s to early 2000s they measured NYPD police accuracy. It came to about 13% in gun fights, 30% otherwise(knife holder). These are guys who are trained to shoot, tested, and meet at very least average standards on defensive shooting.

They hit 13% in a gun fight or 30% otherwise.

3 rounds is lucky as fuck.

>> No.4432599

>>4432500
Almost all modern weapons are based on designs specifically intended to kill people. The intent of an object has nothing to do with the wording of a Constitutional law protecting the right to contemporary, military arms, nor the Supreme Court's decision to support that interpretation of said law (ultimately protecting all but full-auto capability).
>I grew up in a red state
>This thing was meant to kill people
That isn't a logical argument. So was the Garand, so was the 303, so was the Enfield, every firearm any American weapons manufacturer ever produced, from the revolver and onward, was designed to kill people.

The very first bludgeon wasn't intended to hammer nails into wood.

>> No.4432600

>>4432585
>sorry, I can't substantiate my claims therefore I win
I see.

>> No.4432601

>>4432570
At a certain point, a lack of knowledge turns into full metal retard.
And confusing weapons that are easily distinguishable from one another is where full metal retard happens.
>You can't fix stupid

>> No.4432602

>>4432580
>Colt marketed the AR-15 rifle to various military services around the world, including the U.S. Navy, Air Force, Army, and Marine Corps.

>> No.4432604

>>4432536
Then please explain to me why at the age of 16 years old I purchased a black powder revolver from a major sporting goods store with zero background check? Oh, that's right, black powder firearms aren't firearms by legal definition.

>> No.4432605

>>4432587
And we go to---- >>4432585
Fun for all the family, indeed!

>> No.4432606

>>4432573
But these states are making their own laws...
These are not the feds forcing their laws on you, the SCOTUS has already stated that individual states can enact their own gun regulations.
Also I didnt say Washington and Oregon now, I said in the future, Washington and Oregon are getting bluer and bluer as time goes on. It will only be a matter of time before you see gun laws that are on the books in Colorado being enacted in Oregon and Washington.

>> No.4432608

>>4432604
Sonny, everything's a firearm to the ATF. Not everything requires age restrictions or background checks.

>> No.4432610

>>4432598
That said, a lot of officers don't even train as often as they should.

>> No.4432612

>>4432515
>pussies scared to fight
If someone breaks into my home armed with an AK im going to want a fucking AK. If someone breaks into my house with a knife im still gonna want a fucking AK. Life is not the movies. There are no fair fights, and im not going to risk my life, or my families life to fight fairly with a criminal or prove im not "a pussy scared to fight". Why they fuck would I try to prove myself in a home invasion?

The fact of the matter is self-defense is ugly, and scary. There is nothing glorious about it, and there is nothing to "prove". Why would I choose to limit my defense effectiveness knowing full well a criminal with the intent to rape/rob/kill me will not listen to any kind of gun control?

Do you ever stop and think how bad your logic is? You are arguing like a soccermom. You are seriously afraid of guns.

>> No.4432613

>>4432553

Such tortured logic. The history of the 2nd Amendment is actually pretty clear, it was to provide the threat of armed rebellion.

It was not designed as a staging action, it was a direct threat put in by Madison, under Jefferson's direction. And, as we've both shown, effective armed rebellion with civilian weapons is a pipe dream. Meaning the 2nd Amendment is nothing but an anachronism.

>> No.4432615

>>4432610
Yeah, I counted them for AVERAGE, as in less than professional tier, but better than untrained.

>> No.4432617

>>4432551
>The select-fire version of the AR-15 entered the U.S. military system as the M16 rifle

this directly supports people who say the AR 15 isn't a military rifle.

>> No.4432619

>>4432608
see
>>4432567

>> No.4432622

>>4432605
>not having a good answer
>"durr im not here to educate you"
Just admit you don't have a point already. If you did you would have explained yourself.

>> No.4432623

>>4432534

Which state is that? That claims a right to self-defense? And that's applicable to federal law HOW?

>> No.4432624

>>4432604
And I got my SKS when I was 16. What's your point?

>Implying no age restriction on black powder

please tell me where?

>> No.4432625

>>4432524
I don't see the problem. Are you ignoring the reality of the need and natural right for self-defense?

>> No.4432626

>>4432602
The Armalite company designed the AR platform
AR stands for Armalite Rifle

Colt made copies of the platform and sold them to the military

>> No.4432627

>>4432619
Oh, you're talking about Collectibles. Yeah, some stuff's so old it's grandfathered into existance. It doesn't mean that you can buy a new replica musket and say 'this isn't a firearm.'

Vaguely true on both sides, be precise in your wording.

>> No.4432628

>>4432589
not really sure where you're going with that once, since it lacks ANY sentence structure, but the anon you're responding to is correct. most state constitutions do have self-defense stipulations, like castle laws and what have you, and ever last one of them include weapons that aren't guns. I live in wyoming, and i know damn well i could beat someone to death with a rake in my foyer for breaking into my house.
Also:
>people using their best means to self-defense are pussies
yeah, if that's actually what you were implying, that's simply BEYOND retarded

>> No.4432629

>>4432613
>effective armed rebellion with civilian weapons is a pipe dream
haha yeah no; in fact it is highly effective

>> No.4432630

>>4432589
>everyone should use fists or else they're pussies lol, women deserve to be raped by 8 foot tall niggers because they aren't their physical equals!

>> No.4432634

>>4432595
>>4432602
You're both confusing the M16 and the AR15.

The army never bought the AR15 as a service rifle but did conduct field tests with them. The M16 was the one adopted by the army.
5.56 was only used to save weight at that time since military tactics were transitioning to LOLSUPPRESSION instead of aimed accurate fire.

>> No.4432636

>>4432619
>>4432627
Also on that note: Many WW2 era machine guns and such fall under the same category as those collectible/antique weapons.

>> No.4432637

>>4432535

Actually there are rights, despite your bad paraphrasing of Heinlein. In the American system they're self-evident and not granted but existant.

As far as how that goes, I personally have no problem seeing tards go up in flames like at Waco, but it's not up to me.

>> No.4432642

>>4432537

>freedom haters
>DERP CONSTITUTION ONLY HAS 1 AMENDMENT ThE SECOND

>> No.4432643

>This many posts about bullshit
>Not even food related

/ck/ you embarrass me. I am ashamed of ever having set foot in here.

>> No.4432644

>>4432626
Colt didn't make copies. They bought the design and added their own changes.

This thread is full of misinfo.

>> No.4432645

>>4432629

Again, then please list where it's worked

>> No.4432646

>>4432642
If you hate any of the inalienable rights, you hate Freedom. Also you hate Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That's what the BoR is there for, buddy.

>> No.4432647

>>4432573

Oregon will be more likely to turn than Washington. Washington is much more divided than Oregon. Many of it's elections tend to be rather close. What may happen if the Republicans do not mess it up, is that Washington may end up swinging more to the right. There is a healthy amount of gun-owners in Washington. It's mountains and forests attract fudds and enthusiasts alike.

As much as lib-tards would have you believe, Gun-Ownership is not the sole-territory of the right. Many are advocating becoming single issue voters.

>> No.4432649

>>4432576
u too

>> No.4432653

>>4432634

They're effectively the same weapon. We can IS NOT / IS TOO all day, but most weapons experts would agree with me and disagree with you. Put down the Call of Duty and read more Ezell.

>> No.4432655

>>4432644
I was half right, I concede to you, Squid

>> No.4432656

>>4432634
That has to do with the change in general tactics and doctrine, IMO it changed during WWII.

>> No.4432657

>>4432645
>Afghanistan
>Iraq
if those uneducated goat fuckers can hold the entire US military back, we educated few can.
I wanted to post my sandwhich but image limit

>> No.4432658

>>4432628
that was an accident, I meant to reply to a guy that was saying gun owners are pussies because they don't fight with their fists

>> No.4432659

>>4432567
There may be other muzzle loaders also classified as
firearms. As noted, any muzzle loading weapon that is built on a firearm frame or receiver falls
within the definition of a firearm provided in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3).
Finally, even though a prohibited person may lawfully possess an antique firearm under Federal law,
State or local law may classify such weapons as “firearms” subject to regulation. Any person
considering acquiring a black powder weapon should contact his or her State Attorney General’s
Office to inquire about the laws and possible State or local restrictions. A list of State Attorney
General contact numbers may be found at www.naag.org.

>> No.4432660

>>4432649
+ 1

>> No.4432661

>>4432645
The IRA

>> No.4432664

>>4432644
>full of misinfo
Then again, isn't that how the libtards love to operate?

>> No.4432665

>>4432627
Read the whooole thing.

The
definition includes any **replica** of an antique firearm if it is not designed or redesigned for using
rimfire or conventional centerfire fixed ammunition, or uses rimfire or conventional centerfire
ammunition
which is no longer manufactured in the United States, and which is not readily available
in ordi
nary channels of commercial trade. Further, ***any muzzle loading rifle, shotgun, or pistol which
is designed to use black powder or black powder substitute, and
which cannot use fixed ammunition,
is an “antique firearm” ***

>> No.4432666

>>4432625

Self defense with a gun is a natural need? Must be why we evolved with 30 round clips.

There's no natural need for firearms. And there's no right of self-defense in the US constitution.

Not to mention guns are very ineffective at defense, but that's another argument. If that was really your concern you'd be stockpiling Kevlar, not ammo.

>> No.4432667

>>4432642
pick up that can citizen

>> No.4432668

>>4432649
i-it's not like i like you or anything, b-baka

>> No.4432670

>>4432515
>A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
That "security of the free state" portion is interpreted by the supreme court to include the People's individual security, DC vs. Heller clarified the right of citizens to carry for self defense. Your interpretation is irrelevant, and I suspect you've never even read the Second Amendment.

>> No.4432671

>The board /ck/ uses mass faggotry
>It's super effective

>> No.4432672

>>4432649
M-m-me t-too

>> No.4432674

>>4432644
in either case it was changed form the AR design to meet military requirements.

stop bending over dollars to pick up pennies

>> No.4432676

you guys are fucking stupid. OO I NEED A GUN!
would a gun have saved you if you were in the theater at aurora? no because that guy had a machine gun
would it have saved you at sandy hook? no because he also had a fully automatic machine gun

>> No.4432678

>974 replies
I was not expecting so much liberal butthurt when I got up today. I have to say its glorious.

>> No.4432679

ok I'm more confused than when this thread started

Do M4s and M16s count as designs of the AR-15? Why are so many companies able to make civilian ARs?

>> No.4432681

>>4432645
AMERICA

>> No.4432682

>>4432643
>/ck/ you embarrass me. I am ashamed of ever having set fooD in here.

fixed that for you

>> No.4432683

>>4432622
>How dares that baby killer ask me to do some research??
>Who needs that anyway, my feelings trump any reason!

>> No.4432684

>>4432661

Ah, because Ireland is whole?

And the IRA was supplied quite well by Libya, including C4 and rocket launchers, in addition to military weapons from South America bought primarily with money from Boston. Try again.

>> No.4432686

>>4432645
What is guerrilla tactics Alex?

>> No.4432688

>>4432666
>If that was really your concern you'd be stockpiling Kevlar,

You can get killed while wearing the best body armor in the world.

And carrying a 1.5 lb Pistol is better than wearing a 15 lb chest rig with rifle plates.

>> No.4432689

>>4432676

>implying fully auto machine guns are up for sale in the States

Not even once, faggot.

>> No.4432691

>>4432688
You don't need rifle plates. Everyone KNOWS rifles aren't used in any statistically relevant number of violent crimes.

>> No.4432692

>>4432676
troll/10, probably will get some serious responses due to mass butthurt going on

>> No.4432693

>>4432666
>implying we haven't stockpiled

>> No.4432695

>>4432666
hey man i just stopped in this thread and i just have to say, you are a fucking idiot. like every line of what you wrote made my brain contract a little bit. i didnt even know brains could do that

>> No.4432696

>>4432624
>And I got my SKS when I was 16. What's your point?
That's nice.
>please tell me where?
Cabelas, Dicks, Gander Mountain.

>> No.4432699

>>4432676
Pls be trolling

>> No.4432701

>>4432666
> "Not to mention guns are very ineffective at defense, but that's another argument. If that was really your concern you'd be stockpiling Kevlar, not ammo."

Jesus Christ you have to be a troll. No one is this stupid.

>> No.4432702

>>4432666
>And there's no right of self-defense in the US constitution.

It's called the right to life.

>> No.4432703

>>4432679
all AR rifles are civilian.

The military models are restricted from civilian ownership, and has been so since 1986, with the exception of dealers.

>> No.4432704

>>4432666
Self defense is a natural need, which is perpetrated by the use of firearms, the most powerful tools available to the average citizen this millennium. You're also forgetting STATE constitutions, most of which include your rights to self-defense, including castle-laws, concealed or open weapon carry of firearms or blades, etc.

>> No.4432705

>>4432678
ikr?
i wish i could post pictures of my freedom boner.
it would be /ck/ related because its what libtards can suck on.
>>4432689
...nigga you gotta be full retard.
F/As are for sale all the fucking time.
you got 20k?
or if you get the proper license you can buy newly made FA's for $700

>> No.4432706

>>4432657

7th time this stupidity is posted. Taliban was supplied by US and China - when they weren't, like now, they haven't been able to win the revolution.

One of the big failures of Donald Rumsfeld is his failure to secure Iraqi military supplies, especially explosives. Which is why the insurgents, who did not succeed in their revolution btw, used IEDs as their weapon of choice.

>> No.4432708

>>4432684
Are you saying that we cannot manufacture the items you listed?

>> No.4432710

>>4432701

Sadly, they are. /ck/ confirmed for faggotry.

>> No.4432711

>>4432689

b-but they are..............

http://www.subguns.com/classifieds/?db=nfafirearms&category=All+Items+in+this+Category&query=category&search_and_display_db_button=on&results_format=headlines

>> No.4432712

>>4432660
Of course kebab would come from the cooking board.

Remove

>> No.4432713

>>4432576
A pleasure to serve alongside you, /k/omrade.

>> No.4432714

>>4432691
Soft body armor is a lot easier to penetrate than rifle plates, if you have no means to fight back what keeps a criminal from shooting you multiple times until the body armor is penetrated?

>> No.4432715

>>4432684
>And the IRA was supplied quite well by Libya, including C4 and rocket launchers, in addition to military weapons from South America bought primarily with money from Boston. Try again.
every insurgency every where every time is supplied by foreign govts/people, nice try moving them goalposts faggot

>> No.4432717

>>4432676
>theater shooter's rifle jammed after only a few round before switching to his Remmington 870
>Sandy Hook shooter used 2 pistols and police found a Saiga in the trunk of his car

I refuse to use the names of the shooters

>> No.4432719

>>4432676
bad troll, move along
but just in case you actually believe the shit you're shoveling...

>fully automatic firearms
no
>would a gun have saved you?
maybe, and a chance is all i need

>> No.4432720

>>4432711

ATF pls go

>> No.4432723

>>4432706
>revolution
what?

>not winning
actually...

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gwETKZiSrc-lepN63mAUfEGExSlg?docId=CNG.0df9b60f3e4f58cc2468fb1c7f8994ca.11

>> No.4432724

>>4432706
the reason why he couldnt secure military supplies is because that is nearly impossible.
are you really going to argue military knowledge and tactics with the military board?
get back to the kitchen and do what you do best, pretend to be useful.

>> No.4432725

>>4432670

And obviously I have, as I can state quite correctly the phrase 'self-defense' appears nowhere in the constitution.

As for DC vs Heller, it's a very erroneous decision IMHO, stupid in a lesser degree the way Dread Scott was

>> No.4432726

>>4432714
Yeah yeah, even if it doesn't penetrate soft armor the impacts can kill you and in fact EMBED the soft armor into your body in a fatal way. It was a tongue in cheek response to rifles being used in violent crimes, guy.

>> No.4432727

>>4432653
They are not the same rifle you stupid cunt.
Colt added numerous changes including their own magazines, magwell, sights, FA, shell deflector, and some some other minor things. And that was just going from the old AR15 to the M16. Colt continued to add changes after that advanced the design. Then the m4 came out which most modern ARs are based off of.

So shut your stupid face.
>>4432656
A lot more ammo was fired in a fight in Vietnam than in WW2. Averaged out of course.

>> No.4432728

>>4432593
this man understands my original point.

you make it too costly even through normal means, because they will not be able to use drones or bombs for what it would mean to the rest of the populous, that they back off like vietnam. they may have more money, manpower, weapons but if you make it too costly they will back down. that is how things play out here in the usa.

>> No.4432731

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocW3fBqPQkU
Dance with me, /k/omrades. This is a day to remember.

>> No.4432732

>>4432681

Since 1914. And France supplied America in the revolutionary war. Now Haiti is a better example . . . but again, once the machine gun and armor was invented the game changed.

>> No.4432733

>>4432720

what? Class 3 firearms are totally legal.

you just have to pay the tax stamp and wait for the paperwork to go through.

...oh, you have to have lots of money too.

>> No.4432734

>>4432666
>tfw 30 round clipazines are only used in rifles
>tfw rifles account for 2% of deaths in the US

>> No.4432736

>>4432715
>moving them goalposts faggot

please explain to us how an American insurgency would be any different?

>> No.4432738

>>4432683
>I still don't have an actual answer or anything to substantiate my claims
>I know, I'll call him ignorant instead of actually providing valid arguments and call him a liberal to give my words extra weight
>the perfect plan

>> No.4432739

>>4432719
>would a gun have saved you?
>maybe, and a chance is all i need

10/10, remembered for future use

>> No.4432740

>>4432679
The company Armalite designed the AR-15 as a lighter caliber version of the AR-10. They then sold the AR-15 design to Colt who then marketed it towards both the civilian market as the AR-15 and to the military market with a select fire version called the M-16.
>Basically google you fucking retard

>> No.4432741

>>4432733
Hahaha, you think the paperwork HAS to go through. They can just... deny it.

>> No.4432743

>>4432666
Self-defense is an inalienable natural right supported historically and factually. Which is why the majority of states have the Castle Doctrine or forms of it. Are you saying you wish we as a society did not have the ability to defend our lives, or the lives of our friends, loved ones and family?

Rights are not needs. You do not need to prove to me why you need free speech just as I do not "need" to prove why I choose to use my second amendment rights.

You are completely ignorant of firearms and how they work. Stockpile kevlar? Not ammo? So I should stand there and get shot?

Guns simply are the most effective tool for self-defense, the AR-15 being one of them. You are denying reality. If guns are "very ineffective" at self-defense what would you recommend we use for defense then? Please I really could use the laugh.

>> No.4432745

>>4432500
>>4432500
I'm of the opinion that the best guns out there were made for one purpose and one purpose only; to kill human beings. They are typically the most reliable, and are usually accurate enough for anything short of a competitions with target guns. Out of all my guns only two aren't obviously made for killing, and the Deer Rifle could easily be used for the task.

That being said I am still a very pro-gun individual. Why? Because America is in such a position that banning/severely regulating guns is utterly idiotic. We have a country to our south who can't control it's own territory and as it stands most gun crime is because of our foolish drug policies. If we ban/limit firearms it'd only put regular people in worse spots. There is also the fact that an armed populace can jump start rebellion much better then an unarmed one.

I'd love a perfect world where I didn't need to know how to use a rifle, but it doesn't exist. And if it did there would be no reason not to let me have it anyway.

>> No.4432748

>>4432676

Who are you to think it wouldn't. If I can recall correctly an attempted mall-shooting was thwarted by a citizen carrying.

There was no-one there to counter-act the shooter. It was a gun free zone and all of the reasonably Law-abiding individuals were following the law. They were subject to someone who didn't and who wouldn't.

They went from being decent upstanding citizens, to being a herd of panicked animals free to be picked off. Many police have said that they can only usually get there after the fact. It is the citizens duty to be the first response in many situations, something that is lost on people today. From armed defense to first aid. Cops are not obligated to protect you.

>> No.4432750

>>4432743
Doesn't Castle Doctrine originate from Common Law at some point? Possibly even (gasp) British Common Law?

>> No.4432751

>>4432684

Maybe you should read the other responses, fucko. Who exactly is supplying a revolution against the US government? And, if there is to be foreign supplies of arms, WHY DO WE NEED THE 2ND AMENDMENT NOW?

>>4432708
Yes, I am saying a militia uprising in the US would be unable to manufacture armor and air support along with anti-helicopter weapons.

>> No.4432753

>>4431347
yeah, if you keep loaded guns around kids, they you're bound to have an accident.
it's the owner, not the object

>> No.4432754

>>4432743
"not very effective.

>> No.4432755

>>4432736
i would hope it wouldn't be any different. The IRA succeeded on many fronts, and while they didn't fully realize their goals, it was more than enough to call it a victory for them

>> No.4432756

>>4432706
> Successfull insurgency because America
> American insurgency would never work

>> No.4432758

>>4432748

Ummm actually the shooter killed himself in that case, so your point is moot.

>> No.4432759

>>4432666
The right to self-defense is a natural born right and supersedes any law or document.
The constitution doesn't provide rights but only reinforces the ideas and it's up to the people to defend them not the government.
Everything you just said is fucking stupid.

>> No.4432760

>>4432741

>implying that my paperwork would get denied, when I already carry a gun around everywhere I go...

In the field that asks, "What would you do with this item, once acquired?" you just answer

"I would use it for all lawful purposes." and bingo, you're in.

remember, it's a tax stamp, not an approval test.

>> No.4432762

>>4432751
>WHY DO WE NEED THE 2ND AMENDMENT NOW?

Because it's a deterrent and would make it easier fucknuts.

>> No.4432763 [DELETED] 

AWWWWWW FUCK YEAAAAAAAAAHHHHH

/ck/, your tears are delicious.

>> No.4432764

>>4432727
>all that rice will make it a new weapon

Funny, because when AWB1 was in place, I remember you guys crying your butts off about how banning a flash suppressor was stupid. But apparently, going from a 3 prong to a birdcage flash suppressor makes it a WHOLE NEW GUN! Much like putting a round instead of triangular handguard around the barrel.

It's fun being a semantic weasel on the internet, isn't it?

>> No.4432765

>>4432753
nope. there's plenty of gun owners that have kids with no gun related accidents.

inb4 prove it!

that's on you buddy

>> No.4432766

>>4432612
people that use the pussy scared to fight line dont take into consideration that even if they have a knife the attacker still has one other major advantage. surprise. that can mean the difference between them killing you and your family or you dispatching those bastards to their graves.

>> No.4432767

>>4432736
>LEOs and military would join the rebellion
You tell me

>> No.4432768

>>4432524
Okay, you've got one use down-pat, one that is in itself righteous; now, how about its place in relative hobbyism and sport?

And why are you so ardently protecting criminals, assailants, and would-be aggressors?

I'll use your reasoning, straight from your book here: how many people are you planning to rob or rape? Why are you so afraid of armed citizens exercising the right to self-defense that the SCOTUS, House, and even partly the Senate have elected to uphold? Are you out to rape someone's daughter? Better make certain her father isn't a gun enthusiast, she might be trained to protect herself against your ilk. I hope you're around when the next mass self-defense shooting occurs, you crime-nut.

>> No.4432769

>>4432738
Eh, sure you won the argument and what not.

Now, back to your homework!

>> No.4432770

>>4432751
It would be able to cut off supply lines to air force bases, eventually. It would be able to target refuelling stations, it would be able to target refineries. Power plants. Communication hubs. Possibly acquire resources and reinforcements of the regular military. Everyone assumes the government has the military to protect them.... the military may want a say in that.

>> No.4432771

>>4432763
YEEESSSSSSH

>> No.4432773

>>4432612

Saved. Image limit reached, though.

There is no honor in life or death situations. That shit exists in duels and playground fights, but not in the real world. Fighting fair has never been a part of any business that's even remotely serious.

>> No.4432774 [DELETED] 

>>4432764
Just ignore 9mm. He's a professional shitposter (read: cocksucker) on /k/ and "his" AR looks like shit.

>> No.4432775

>>4432750
I believe so yes. Also John Locke played a role in influencing they ideas behind our country. ANyone who thinks he would not support self-defense is a fucking idiot.

>> No.4432777

>>4432750
>implying Limes believe in self preservation anymore

>> No.4432778

>>4432751
>anti-helicopter weapons
I laugh at this one every time it's posted, because it's so goddamn stupid

If you've ever been near a military helicopter, you'd know just how fragile they are. Helicopters CAN be taken down with small arms, and thanks to the availability of firearms to civilians in the US, especially higher caliber ones, a group of 3-4 people with higher caliber, semi-automatic weapons could easily shoot down a military helicopter. Even the ill-equiped taliban were capable of it

The more you know.

>> No.4432779

>>4432440
>The purpose of a handgun is shooting people, it has no other.

The purpose of a nuclear weapon is nuclear holocost, it has no other.

The purpose of a condom is rape, it has no other.

The purpose of the internet is porn, it has no other.

The purpose of a finger is to pick buggers, it has no other.

The purpose of women is to work in the kitchen, it has no other.


I can play your game too.

>> No.4432780

>>4432769
>I'll call him a kid, that ought to hide my lack of any sort of point whatsoever MARVEL AT MY DEBATING SKILLS!

>> No.4432783

>>4432676
You are either completely ignorant or a /k/ommando looking to rustle some jimmies.

>> No.4432787

>>4432779
>The purpose of a nuclear weapon is nuclear holocost, it has no other.
Basically, yes.

>> No.4432788

>>4432533
>It'll never happen! I'll be right here when it never happens!
Why are you so afraid of yourself that you assume anyone other than you lacks discipline and self-control. Keep your inadequacies out of this.

>> No.4432789

>>4432779
at least make it ck related

the purpose of women is to cook in the kitchen, it has no other.

>> No.4432790

>>4432751
>And, if there is to be foreign supplies of arms, WHY DO WE NEED THE 2ND AMENDMENT NOW?
haha, confirmed for being a faggot who sucks other countries dicks. way to not rely on yourself for the security of your country.

>> No.4432793

>>4431403
You know, I'm curious about something here. There seem to be a few of
you who have deemed themselves penis experts and I can only assume that
you are one of them seeing as you have made such a post. Since you are
such an aficionado of the penis and the sizes of them when it comes to
the types of firearms that one might or might not own, how exactly do
you determine what the firearm/penis size is? I mean does an average penis
qualify for a .22 single shot rifle or maybe a Derringer handgun and a
bigger wang get you a Red Rider BB gun while a smaller dangle score you a
larger caliber weapon? Or is there some other criteria that you use not
based on size vs caliber but size vs rate of fire? How many penises did you
study to arrive at your determination? Did you consider them while flaccid
or turgid? Was this done in person or were lots of pictures enough for you?
If in person did you hold them or was a good long look enough? One of the
guys I work with is in the market for a new handgun. Perhaps he could send
you a picture of his penis and you could tell him what would work best for
him. Let me know.

>> No.4432794

>>4432787
I've seen in movies and television where people ride them

>> No.4432796

>>4432743
>Self-defense is an inalienable natural right supported historically and factually

Where? By whom? The 2nd Amendment doesn't deal with it in language, nor does anywhere else in the constitution.

>You do not need to prove to me why you need free speech just as I do not "need" to prove why I choose to use my second amendment rights.

Actually in cases where it conflicts with other rights you do. My right to yell fire in a theater is curtailed when it conflicts with the rights of life of people around me. Likewise, your right to have an AR-15 has to be weighed against the right of the children in Sandy Hook not to be killed.


>Guns simply are the most effective tool for self-defense, the AR-15 being one of them

Guns have no defensive use actually - they are completely offensive, so please stop hiding behind 'self-defense'. You're saying they're an effective tool for killing people before they kill you. Which is not defensive, so drop the pretense that it is.

>> No.4432797

>>4432764
What does a flash suppressor or the AWB have to do with anything? Good touch calling it "AWB1" like a new one has any chance gun grabber.

You have not backed your opinion up at all. I listed multiple features absent on the original AR15s that were added to the m16. They are not the same rifle and only a fucking retarded would claim otherwise.

So gungrabber please just leave and take your emotional bullshit with you. Just because a gun is black and scary doesn't make all black and scary guns the same.

*Also fun fact. Colt used their own version of gray on the M16 which is another feature differentiating it from the early AR15s.

>> No.4432798

>>4432758
well the sandy hook killed himself too, so I guess that just a get out of jail free card.
ummmmmm and nick had him in his sight picture but didn't shoot since he didn't want to hit any bystanders

>> No.4432799

>>4432779
Wait, some of these are true.

>> No.4432800

>>4432790

Because they are enthralled by the thought of being a completely useless piece of flesh that will never be remembered.

Being useful is foreign to these faggots.

>> No.4432806

>>4432796
>You're saying they're an effective tool for killing people before they kill you. Which is not defensive, so drop the pretense that it is.
Do you suck dicks? Are you a peter-puffer?

>> No.4432808

>>4432405
If they aren't up to par wit the military why are you calling them weapons of war? Also insisting a gun can not shoot down a helo is ridiculous. Just aim at the rotor. Once that shit is gone that helo is falling out of the sky. And rotors are delicate as fuck.

>> No.4432810

>>4432774
How can they look like shit if I own none?

>> No.4432813

>>4432770

> Everyone assumes the government has the military to protect them.... the military may want a say in that.

Which is the most likely thing to happen if there was an attempted coup in the government.

And it's besides the point. The original intention of the 2nd Amendment, to have a possible armed revolution, is simply not possible today. Gun nuts need to drop the bullshit of their hobby being a check on government tyranny, cause it's simply not true.

>> No.4432817

>>4432797
>they even made one in grey so it's a whole new product

My head hurts from all the stupid.

>> No.4432818

>>4432796
>My right to yell fire in a theater is curtailed when it conflicts with the rights of life of people around me.
Yes, this is because it could hurt people.

>Likewise, your right to have an AR-15 has to be weighed against the right of the children in Sandy Hook not to be killed.
Wrong, that happened because someone killed other people, not because a weapon got up and decided that today it was going to shoot up a school. Your using an appeal to emotion, stop that.

>> No.4432819

>>4432796
Common Law, if not English Common Law, US Common Law.

Gun ownership conflicts with nothing, gun owners may. Availability of weapons has nothing to do with you or your safety any more than it has to do with me or mine. It's everyone's Right.

Guns aren't simply the most effective tool for self defense, they are the most effective tool for offense and the only 'force equalizer' that exists. Matching OR EXCEEDING the amount of deadly force used against you is the ONLY effective way to prevent violence from being used AGAINST anyone. There is truth to the phrase "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." You just refuse to admit that A) Police aren't the only good guys that exist and B) Police aren't always around.

In any situation, Police are less effective when they aren't there than ANY METHOD that is nearby.

>> No.4432821

>>4432733

My bad, I didn't see your trip, and thought it was some anti or a fed.

>>4432751

Obviously some people shouldn't be allowed to own guns, you would be one of them. If you're willing to take rights from other people away, expect the same, but I would choose to take your freedom of speech.

>> No.4432822

>>4432808

You do know life isn't a video game, right?

>> No.4432823

>>4432798

BUT GUNS SURE DO STOP CRIME HUH!!!!

>> No.4432824

>>4432787
you could blow up and asteroid or something with one, heck some crazy scientists thought about using the blasts as propulsion in spaceships.

open your mind

>> No.4432825

>>4432796
state constitutions

the man who yells fire is in jail. your freedom of speech is protected. the man who shoots a child/children is in jail/dead. my freedom to own and operate a firearm is badgered and questioned to no end

in that case walls and shields are offensive, because i can build a shield-wall on wheels to block bullets, or smack someone over the head with a kite-shield

NEXT

>> No.4432826

>>4432796
8.8/10

>> No.4432827

/ck/ all of your rice belong to us now.
Weeboo's

>> No.4432828

>>4432817
Good strawman argument there gun grabber.

>> No.4432829

>>4432813
I don't think it's an MAXIMALLY EFFECTIVE check on tyranny, but it's the only one we can get. It's the only one that can exist. It's the best chance if the need arises, and you better pray that something works out if it does.

I hope it doesn't, I am proud of States stepping up against illegal Federal laws. I also know that National Guardsmen are under the direct control of State Governors for a fucking reason.

>> No.4432830

>>4432822
>HURR INVICIBLE GUV'MENT CHOPPERS
Do you?

>> No.4432831

>>4432819
I'd like to add the phrase
>When seconds count, the police are minutes away

>> No.4432832

>>4432794
on an asteroid

>> No.4432833

>>4432818

>Yes, this is because it could hurt people.
And the same potential exists in firearms.

>Wrong, that happened because someone killed other people,
Nobodies claiming the gun did it on their own, so stop being fatuous. I'm making no appeal to emotion, the simple fact is that the killer could not kill nearly as many people without the weapons he had. And that's why there's a valid societal interest in reducing the potential harm of these weapons.

>> No.4432834

>>4432831
And don't forget that the police are under no legal obligation to protect you from crime.

>> No.4432835

>>4432824
>crazy scientist
You mean Wernher von Braun surely and he wasn't crazy. Riding the blast wave of a nuke would be great and it was the best idea at the time given human technology at the time.

>> No.4432837

>>4432829
>National Guardsmen are under the direct control of State Governors for a fucking reason.
After 9/11, the President can federalize them at any time for any reason.

>> No.4432838

>>4432479
so poor he can only afford a single shot shotgun and cheeseless macaroni.

>> No.4432839

>>4432544
Precisely. Neither the Second Amendment nor this imaginary "loophole" protect the individual right of private transaction, that is a different law entirely, and it too would be violated by the government if it tried to close this magical "loophole".

Also, I haven't ever been able to nor have I seen anyone ever purchase a firearm at a gunshow without a background check, the process used at gunshows is just so efficient and sound. No firearm used to commit a crime by a criminal was ever purchased at a gunshow, and straw purchases are illegal anyway, no law is going to change this. I hate when they bang on about this shit, they haven't a clue what they're arguing.

>> No.4432841

>>4432834
Very true

>> No.4432844

>>4432833

>caring about potential harm
>not caring about your freedoms
>lose freedom for safety

Never, coward. Quit trying to stop technology.

>> No.4432845

>>4432819
>There is truth to the phrase "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."

Because you say so? Why isn't the EU and Australia burning from the looting and raping by criminal gangs if that's the case?

>> No.4432846

>>4432833
you're arguing based on events that rarely happen to a relatively small number of people. guns save more lives every year than are taken at all mass shootings combined.

>> No.4432847

>>4432823
guess who had guns at sandy hook.
Lanza
guess who didnt
the teachers and kids.
who ended the rampage?
the one with the gun.

im not saying we toss guns into the hands of every man woman and child, but no-gun zones dont work.
why not allow people to have a chance instead of making more laws that are ineffective.
>murder is illegal yet it still happens.
>laws instantly stop all acts of violence and crime
>>4432817
yes, libtarded laws are stupid.
in cali if you get a new color of handgun you need a completely new form to import it. even if its identical in every way other than color.

>> No.4432848

>>4432824
Using the same amount of fissile material to power an ion engine would be far more effective in both those scenarios than just chucking a bomb at them.

>> No.4432849

>>4432637
>bad paraphrasing of Heinlein

Suprised you actually know who heinlein is.

Regardless, your counterpoint isn't actually an argument...it's just an assertion of your view.

Could you please deconstruct heinlein's argument concerning rights and force-application and actually provide a counter-argument, instead of just reasserting your counterpoint?

>> No.4432851

>>4432821

Come and take it then.

>> No.4432853

>>4432845
Because Australia already has everything else trying to kill them.

>> No.4432856

>>4432833
>Likewise, your right to have an AR-15 has to be weighed against the right of the children in Sandy Hook not to be killed.
That is an appeal to emotion.
>And the same potential exists in firearms.
Using a weapon for crime is already illegal though, what is your point?
So how does the world look from up there on that tall pile of dead children you are trying to make proclamations from?

>> No.4432857

So many /k/ommandos crushing these no guns. Sure is 1774 in here.

>> No.4432858

>>4432837
And... they'll obey that order? Honestly the paper laws only go so far. If it's MY STATE vs. OUR PRESIDENT....I think I know who wins out.... Of course it's not good. California Nasty Girls deployed to New York and vise versa... THEN DHS blacks out national media and says fuck those guys.... well, get back home NOW. Listen to your Governor AFTER that, I dare you.

There is no good outcome. None. I am a very cynical optimist though.

>>4432845
They are. There's more violent crime now than before gun bans, in fact. This has been discussed, albeit without credible sources. They're available from google. Either way your argument does not hold water.

>> No.4432859

>>4432780
Now, now, there is work to do. Or do you want those evil baby killers to win the day?

>> No.4432861

>>4432831
Hello I work as a communications officer my job is to keep my police officers alive and informed about any situation. At Major events or during Rush hours most officers wont be there to help you.

Keep in mind that if they don't want to help they wont because it's their decision to do so.
Police Officers sometimes have to deal with a lot of stress and their help is limited.

>> No.4432862

>>4431511
because who in their right mind would bring a friend when they're fighting 2 guys?

only faggots really, i bet they have tiny dicks and can't take a beating.

>> No.4432864

>>4432822
You do know that even a postage stamp can throw a helicopters blades off by so much that they will fall apart? (heard from a helo pilot) Imagine what a bullet will do.

>> No.4432865

>>4432858
people obey orders.
Proof?
every genocide ever.
stick to cooking guys, knowledge of history and reason isnt your forte

>> No.4432866

>>4432041
cucumber is a fruit

>> No.4432869

>>4432865
>stick to cooking guys, knowledge of history and reason isnt your forte
Just like basic chemistry isnt for /k/ or /pol/

>> No.4432870

>>4432868

Says the slave to the free man. I'm not the one begging for a gilded cage of safety.

>> No.4432871

>>4432864
lol. cool story. stay in school.

>> No.4432867

>>4432864

Didn't Mythbusters break that one?

>> No.4432868

>>4432844

Shove it, asshole, parroting slogans because you like guns doesn't make you a patroit.

>> No.4432872

>>4431146
>thinking that feeling safe = being safe

>> No.4432873

>>4432779
>The purpose of women is to work in the kitchen, it has no other.
This, women are not capable of making coherent thoughts.

>> No.4432874

>>4432859
And now you're just trolling.

>> No.4432875

>>4432846
>you're arguing based on events that rarely happen to a relatively small number of people.

So is the basis for EVERY claim of self-defense pro-gun people make.


>guns save more lives every year than are taken at all mass shootings combined.

No, they don't. Provide a source for that bullshit if you're going to claim it.

>> No.4432877

>>4432861
Hence why many police officers believe the populous should be armed so they can defend themselves

>> No.4432878

>>4432865
I understand, especially if the orders are full of misinformation. It's, again, not a good place to be in.... and I hope and pray they'd be on my side in that horrible situation. I am the cynical optimist, but I like to think the optimism wins out.

>>4432869
Oh, we have basic chemistry on /k/.... we just came to /ck/ to borrow some pressure cookers.

>> No.4432879

>>4432869
we have some chemists.
we like to play with backyard explosives

>> No.4432880

>>4432867
They were bribed by the gubmint.

>> No.4432881

>>4432867
Not sure. I dont watch that show much. If they did, oh well. My point still stands. A round hitting a helo blade with cause enough disturbance to knock the rotors out of action. Even more so if you aim for the tail rotors.

>> No.4432882

>>4432879

>praise be to the man who figured out dragon's breath

>> No.4432883

>>4432867
common sense broke it, and the MB also did

>> No.4432884

>>4432796
Thought the Second does not state self-defense explicitly, self-defense is a great perk we get that is built upon the Second and other principles and ideas our founders held when forming our nation. The fact is self-defense is a natural right, as early as Roman law. Self-defense is an inalienable right wither you wish to accept reality or not. Most states have Castle Doctrines or forms of this which support this claim. Its also important to understand there are a lot of implied rights in the constitution. Also are you seriously try to advocate that we shouldn't have this natural right? Why would you even try to argue against having self-defense in society, that is essential to a free society.

>Likewise, your right to have an AR-15 has to be weighed against the right of the children in Sandy Hook not to be killed.

Wow my fucking sides. Owning guns lawfully does not threaten your life or anyone else's rights. Im sorry lawful private gun ownership offends you so much.

Basically the is no tragedy great enough to motivate me to sacrifice ANY of my rights.

>Guns have no defensive use actually - they are completely offensive, so please stop hiding behind 'self-defense'. You're saying they're an effective tool for killing people before they kill you. Which is not defensive, so drop the pretense that it is.

You just described the very premise of self-defense, how nieve are you? I gotta ask what color is the sky in your world? Seriously, I don't think you even are capable of accepting reality.

Killing someone effectively before they kill/rape/rob you is defensive. Are you ignoring horrific crime existis in society?

>> No.4432885

>>4432875
Except we've shown ITT that there are many instances of self-defense in this country.
School shootings are only a fraction of a percent compared to defending yourself.

>> No.4432886

>>4432871
Master argument there, broski.

>> No.4432887

>>4432881
no it wouldn't; I've seen them hit with plenty of rounds

>> No.4432888

>>4432565
As well as all modern technology.

Ban assault calculators!

>> No.4432889

>>4432881
you are fucking retarded. im serious. stay in school and stop making shit up to sound cool.

>> No.4432890

>>4432878
>>4432879
Yah, too bad most of you seem to deny that CO2 levels are rising at a rate faster than ever. I was in a thread on /k/ just last night where everyone was saying that it didnt matter.

>> No.4432891

>>4432837
>After 9/11

actually, it's been a much MUCH longer timescale...

Eisenhower nationalised the guard during the alabama school integration crisis so that they wouldn't be under the control of their racist governor, then he sent in the US army just to make double-sure the NG/governor didn't try any funny business.

>> No.4432894

>>4432868
>patroit
Actually taking a stance against statism is the opposite, isn't it?

>>4432823
hence why police have them

>> No.4432895

>>4432856

>That is an appeal to emotion.

It's not, you simply find the comparison emotional because of the scope of the horror. The children killed at Sandy Hook had a right to life, and that right was violated by someone who was exercising his second amendment right to be armed. That's simple facts. So we see the rights can conflict - because if the shooter had not been armed, the right to life would not have been violated.

>Using a weapon for crime is already illegal though, what is your point?

That there's a clear societal interest in preventing these crimes, as they violate other rights of citizens. Even if my yelling 'fire' doesn't cause a riot and kill people, there's a restraint upon me not to do so.

>> No.4432896

>>4432890
I don't deny shit. I fully admit to ignorance on that shit. I did hear bad things about ocean desalinization due to melting icecap waters. I'm really more worried about that... throwing off all the oceans and causing hurricanes and shit. CO2? I can plant enough trees and shit to keep me breathing.

>> No.4432897

>>4432887
Oh really, where battlefield 3? I am more specifically talking about the tail rotors as the main rotors are often reinforced with harder metals.

>> No.4432898

>>4432871
What is a gyroscope Alex?

>> No.4432900

>>4432889
Wait to give an argument against what I said.

>> No.4432901

>>4432890

>worried about CO2
>not having terrariums to hoard your own O2

What a faggot.

>> No.4432902

>>4432796
>You're saying they're an effective tool for killing people before they kill you. Which is not defensive, so drop the pretense that it is.

5 star comedy gold.

>> No.4432904

>>4432895
The person who killed those chillens broke several laws prior to killing them

>> No.4432906

>>4432890
...what?
whas this have to do with anything?
and saying it doesnt matter doesnt mean we dont understand chemistry or the effects of co2 on the environment, we just know that whatever we do the average retard will do whats easiest and cheapest which means fossil fuels.
theres no point in trying to change it. once we run out if fuels or fuels become so scarce that a more efficient method is made we will then see a change

>> No.4432907

>>4432796
>>4432796
>Guns have no defensive use actually - they are completely offensive, so please stop hiding behind 'self-defense'. You're saying they're an effective tool for killing people before they kill you. Which is not defensive, so drop the pretense that it is.

>you can only use deadly force when you are already dead

>> No.4432908

>>4432885

And there's also plenty of gun deaths in this country, so the net even before massacres doesn't add up to prevention. Is /k/ always this bad at math?

>> No.4432909

>>4432872
which is what makes freedom control...i mean gun coontrol useless

>> No.4432910

>>4432895
>and that right was violated
Indeed it was.
>that right was violated by someone who was exercising his second amendment right to be armed
He stole those guns.
>That there's a clear societal interest in preventing these crimes, as they violate other rights of citizens
Indeed, which is why they are illegal and most gun crime occurs with stolen guns and is almost always against other criminals.
>Even if my yelling 'fire' doesn't cause a riot and kill people, there's a restraint upon me not to do so
Which is exactly why most people who legally own guns never use them for crime.

>> No.4432913

>>4432904
He did in fact commit a murder for which he was not immediately imprisoned by police BEFORE he mass-murdered later.

Police exist, why didn't they catch him for the 1st murder?!

>> No.4432914

>>4432577
Also called the Slippery Slope fallacy.

>> No.4432915

>>4432875
there are many studies out there, feel free to google up on defensive gun use. lowest estimates are just under 100k, and go as high as 2mill or so.

>> No.4432917

>>4432881
The tail Maybe, but you'd need a high caliber to do any kind of damage
especially because these are MADE TO SURVIVE SMALL ARMS FIRE..
Seriously, learn2chopper...
That being said, at least 350 million privately owned weapons vs government loyal agencies
and maybe MAYBE about 50% of the army (they aren't just soldiers, they are human
I SERIOUSLY doubt they'd lay down fire on their own...)

>> No.4432918

>>4432900
it's common sense that a stamp or bullet wont take down a helo like you think. if you actually think that you are retarded.

>> No.4432919

>>4432881
No you moron, look at fucking Vietnam.

>> No.4432921

>>4432906

Standard troll distraction, ignore it.

>> No.4432923

>>4432895
The Second amendment does not give you the right to slaughter innocent children. How fucking dumb/desperate are you?

Have you ever even held/used or own a gun?

>> No.4432925

>>4432895
>It's not, you simply find the comparison emotional because of the scope of the horror

And you're using an anecdote.

>> No.4432927

>>4432902

Because words have meanings?

The action of defending or protecting from attack, danger, or injury.

Preemptive attack, which is what guns offer, isn't defense.

>> No.4432929

>>4432918
Given that rotor blades are hollow aircraft aluminium, it is idotic to think that they can withstand multiple shots and still function properly.

>> No.4432931

>>4432881
just one round?
and aren't helicopters always in need of constant repair?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTmRZn98XxI&

>> No.4432932

>>4432896
We have ice core samples which give us an exceedingly accurate history of what is in the atmosphere for the past 2 million years. In the past 150 years, ever since the industrial revolution started, CO2 levels have been rising at the highest rate we have ever seen in all of those 2 million years. If ocean temps are raised too much massive deposits of methane hydrates will be released and then we will be fucked.

>> No.4432933

>>4432923

No, because they're so scared of how they'll fly off the handle because of their own useless, insipid weaknesses. They're nothing more than slaves begging for the cages.

>> No.4432934

>>4432908
Math doesn't matter. One human life with all rights intact > any number of other lives with rights infringed. It's sad sad math, but it's right.

>> No.4432936

>>4432895
>owning weapons = murder
You fucking retard. How about you use something of that 'common sense'.

>> No.4432937

>>4432908
does /ck/ never even read the thread? i wonder what study you are getting your number of "gun deaths" from, because i have a feeling i know the answer

>> No.4432938

>>4432918
http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/canadian-forces-confirms-helicopter-was-brought-down-by-small-arms-fire/article1214299/?service=mobile Link of the sort of thing happening faggot

>> No.4432941

>>4432921
>itt /k/ assumes direct control
>liberals get ass demolished
>liberals drowning in their own tears

>> No.4432942

>>4432932
>not farming your own O2
Do you even anti-greenhouse gas, faggot?

>> No.4432943

>>4432918
>bullet wont take down a helo

I know right? when I play CoD I have to empty an SAW into the fucking thing

>> No.4432944

>>4432927
3/10 made me reply.

>> No.4432945

>>4432918
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/06/world/asia/afghanistan-us-troops another

>> No.4432946

>>4432908
Most murders in this country are by criminals in slums done to other criminals in slums

No one cares about black on black crime in poverty stricken regions
People only care about the beautiful, innocent white babies

>> No.4432947

>>4432941
http://images.4chan.org/k/src/1367179735239.png

>> No.4432954

>>4432934
wut

>> No.4432955

>>4432925

Again, no. I'm using a well known example. But anyone killed by a legal firearm (the vast majority of gun deaths that are not suicide in the US) finds their right to life in conflict with the shooter's 2nd amendment right. It's not a question as so many seek to phrase it of wanting to just remove rights.

>> No.4432959

>>4432938
did you even read the article? it proves nothing to help you. if the article said "1 bullet in a rotor blade caused the helo to crash..." then it would be a useful source, but it's not. any other useless stuff you want me to read that doesnt help prove your ignorant point?

>> No.4432960

>>4432796
>Likewise, your right to have an AR-15 has to be weighed against the right of the children in Sandy Hook not to be killed.

You're right, because the AR-15 is specifically designed to kill children. No other guns, including the other two he had on him, fires an evil enough caliber able to penetrate their innocence.

>You're saying they're an effective tool for killing people before they kill you. Which is not defensive, so drop the pretense that it is.

2/10, actually believed you were serious for a second.

>> No.4432961

>>4432941
I was telling you to ignore the greenhouse gasses faggot. Also, appropriate responses against them would be:

>>4432942
>>4432901

>> No.4432963

>>4432946
>>4431866

>> No.4432964

>>4432955
>implying if guns were outlawed they would solve their differences over a brew, and not just stab each other to death

>> No.4432965

>>4432936

Can you not read? Or are you claiming that the killer at Sandy Hook could have killed as many people without a gun?

>> No.4432966

>>4432954
Human rights. The ones described in the bill of rights? Yeah, keeping them safe is worth millions of lives. I'm sorry about your feels, bro. They're Rights, nay-sayers are wrong.

>> No.4432967

>>4432937
cnn or huffpo probably

>> No.4432968

>>4432937
i assume they don't. its been a fast thread with all the replies

>> No.4432972

>>4432959
I was talking about shooting down a helicopter with a fucking rifle. You are taking my one round quote and using it againts me of course. but this proves you fucking can use rifle rounds to shoot down helicopters.

>> No.4432973

/ck/ in a nutshell:

1 TSP of JIDF
2 TBSP of Feels
3 CUPS of Stupid
1 Large chunk of Buttmad roast

Directions:

Put ingredients together in an oven, then throw it away once you burn it.

>> No.4432974

>>4432945
>cnn
lol

>> No.4432975

>>4432964

Not implying that at all. You're not going to stab 22 people to death though, while shooting that many is easily possible.

>> No.4432976

>>4432945
dude, you clearly dont even know what we're talking about. stay in school. do you have anything to back up your stamp/bullet on the rotor claim? no? ok.

>> No.4432978

>>4432955
But that's wrong on every level.

>> No.4432979

>>4432955
>But anyone killed by a legal firearm
except your example used stolen firearms.

>right to life
>over second amendment
>Implying there's a strong connection between legal gun owners and illegal gun activity

>> No.4432980

>>4432758
Killers only shoot their head off when armed presence comes. Every killer has kept their barrels horizontal until the police arrive, because they know they can't win that battle so they end it. In the mall shooter case, the innocent victims didn't have to wait for the police, because there was an armed citizen.

>> No.4432981

>>4432975
....
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012-12/14/c_132041711.htm

>22 students stabbed in central China attack

>> No.4432982

>>4432955
>anyone killed by a legal firearm
>>4432975
>Not implying that at all. You're not going to stab 22 people to death though, while shooting that many is easily possible.

then i have no idea what the fuck you are trying to say.

>> No.4432983

>>4432972
except thats not what you were suppose to prove, we were talking about a hit to the rotor taking a helo down in with 1 bullet and/or a stamp. neither of which is plausible

>> No.4432984

>>4432975
Are you implying that guns make school massacres easy? Andrew Kehoe would like a word with you.

>> No.4432985

>>4432975
whenever people say that, all i imagine is just running through a brady campaign fund raiser with a plate carrier and a sword.
it worked in the medievil times, it will certainly work now.
especially with all those noguns there i could easily get 22 people.
lock the exits and just go to town.

>> No.4432986

>>4432965
can you educate yourself?
what exactly are you doing with your life and trying to prove?

>> No.4432987

>>4432976
Stay in school is all you can say. I just proved "small arms" aka what americans can get a hold of, can shoot down helicopters. The stamp and one bullet thing are unlikely, but I still proved to you faggots that you can shoot down helicopters. They are not invincible. They have weak spots.

>> No.4432988

>>4432982

You have no idea what he's trying to say because he's too busy spilling spaghetti all over the fucking place.

>> No.4432991

>>4432987
>moving the goalposts

>> No.4432992

>>4432983
But the original claim was that "your guns cant shoot down helicopters" That is what I was proving wrong.

>> No.4432993

>>4432985
If you do that you should smear your sword with shit first, otherwise people are going to recover from their wounds too easily.

>> No.4432994

>>4432349
we did until 15 miniutes ago, so i'll let that slide

also, we might soon have them back. the vote was very close ( 1 dude in the senate), and our supreme court is bro-tier.

>> No.4432995

>>4432975
Good thing legal gun owners don't do that more then people who own knives.

>> No.4432997

>>4432991

See >>4432992

>> No.4432998

>>4432987
Mythbusters tested the stamp thing. It didn't work. Now bullets on the other hand....

>> No.4432999

>>4432965

Actually, the same day of Sandy Hook a man in China stabbed 20-something schoolkids to death.

The real point is that gun control does not reduce crime. In the USA the cities with the strictest gun control have the highest crime rates as well. Also, we've tried this already. We had an assault weapons ban from '95 through 2005; it included a ban on those evil high capacity magazines. It had no effect on the crime rate, murder rate, or incidence of mass shootings. The columbine killers didn't have high capacity magazines yet they still killed more people. We've tried it. It doesn't work. Why don't we just ban crime?

sage for off topic

>> No.4433000

>>4432999
See
>>4432981

22.
>You're not going to stab 22 people

>> No.4433002

>>4432993
>recovery from being disemboweled
i dont think modern medicine has come up for a cure for being cut in half. or stabbed clean through by a 4' sword

>> No.4433004

>>4432993
Decapitation

Only lethal when the weapon is smeared in shit

>> No.4433005

Oh cool. I didn't know they had ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Food) threads on /ck/. I thought it was strictly a /k/ thing.

Also, look: Actual information!

Murder Victims by Weapon
FBI.gov, Expanded Homicide Data Table 8
2011
Rifles 323
Knives or cutting instruments 1,694
Blunt objects (clubs, hammers, etc.) 496
Personal weapons (hands, feet, etc.) 728

>> No.4433007

>>4432965
probably more so

Oklahoma.jpeg

>> No.4433008

>>4432987
no shit...youre the one who said 1 hit to a rotor will take a helo down. you have yet to show any evidence of it (because there isnt any).

>> No.4433009

>>4432999
>sage for off topic
Nigger the thread has been in autosage for like an hour.

>> No.4433012

>>4433009

The /k/ommando train never ends.

>> No.4433014

GREATER QUESTION:
why arent we calling for better bomb control?
i mean after boston it should be expected.
how about OKC

>> No.4433016

>>4432877
Because Police Officers wont be there to protect anyone in danger if He/She is having personal or issues with the area or situation at the moment some officers have to deal with traffic jam as well as weather and many emergency at once some officers receive over 5-6 calls in an hour and most can't handle them under an hour or two.

>> No.4433017 [DELETED] 

>>4433014
BAN ASSAULT PRESSURE COOKERS!!!!

>> No.4433018

>>4432994
i hope this true. last thing we need is a state like colorado caving like it's in the north east.

>> No.4433020

>>4432992
>was proving wrong
Trying to prove wrong.

>> No.4433021

>>4432833
So you would have rather 10 children have been stabbed to death than 30 been shot to death? You are such a caring person.

Oh, but you know what? If there was an armed presence at the school, that number could be as low as, I don't know, 0. I like that chance better.

Or perhaps he wouldn't even have entered the school if he knew it was guarded.

>> No.4433022

>>4433008
Moving the goalposts, bro.

>> No.4433023

What's the record for non-stickied replies? I have a feeling this thread's doing pretty well

>> No.4433025

>>4433002
>cutting people in half
....okay

>> No.4433026 [DELETED] 

>>4433025
>thinking it cant be done

>> No.4433031

>>4433023
Depending on the board, that may very well be a variable number
I made a thread on /wsg/ and it was up for 4 or 5 days with out a single bump

>> No.4433032

>>4433025
>people
you mean bwadyfags
they stand atop the bodies of children to push their agenda. id be cleaving monsters in half.

>> No.4433034

http://images.4chan.org/k/src/1367178968448.jpg

>> No.4433035

>>4433018
too late. dems will control colorado for the foreseeable future and nothing good will come of it. all the cali fags moved here and fucked the state up. id shoot dickinpooper myself but i have reservations about using a 30 cent bullet on a worthless politician, especially during a recession

>> No.4433036

>>4433021
and how the hell did he even get in the building? people aren't doing their jobs. thats the problem

>> No.4433038

>>4433026
>thinking that it's easy

>> No.4433039

>>4433034
Nonsense. You have to be 21 to buy destructive devices and good luck finding someone who'll sell a Stinger to you.

>> No.4433041

>>4433032
Would operate with. Or inadvertently kill testing out that whole pipe bombs>everything idea.

>> No.4433042 [DELETED] 

>>4433038
>implying i said it could be done in one clean cut.
We ax murderer now.

>> No.4433043

>>4432549
this

>> No.4433046

I'm sorry /ck/, I see many /k/iddos spread their lower intelligence here.
We all are not like this! At this time, /k/ is filled with /b/ /v/ /mlp/ and /pol/.
Please don't hate /k/ now, we are better... after 8 hours...
>mattv2099 pic

>> No.4433047

>>4433038
>thinking its not with a 5 foot bustasword replica

>> No.4433050

>>4433039
I think you can build destructive devices at 18. Brb homemade SAMs.

>> No.4433051 [DELETED] 

>>4433046
>yfw half of night /k/ is here right now

>> No.4433052

>>4433046
>we are better
HAH. HAhahahahahaha.
>oh wait, you're serious
>let me laugh even harder

>> No.4433053

>>4433047
...okay

>> No.4433054

>>4433046
Good, good... let the butthurt flow through.

>> No.4433055

>>4433046
/k/ always has horsefuckers from /mlp/
They hide their powerlevels on /k/
I should know, I'm one of them

>> No.4433058

>>4433039
for the right price you could probably get a SA7, would be easier than finding a working stinger

>> No.4433063

>>4433055
Indeed

>> No.4433064 [DELETED] 

>>4433055
>>4433063
Then I'll help you find your way home.
>>>/mlp/
Git and stay git.

>> No.4433065

Fuck you /ck/

Have some Alton Brown!

>> No.4433066

/k/ommandos, I think they want this thread to die now.

Should we keep posting for the sake of it, or mercifully end it?

>> No.4433069

>>4432642
>Arguing Rights with respect to the Second given the subject of this debate
>YOU MUST HATE THE REST OF THE CONSTITUTION, YOU STUPID REDNECKS ONLY CARE ABOUT THE SECOBDEGGBFF
/k/ is largely comprised of rabid, hard-line Constitutionalists. We were never debating the First Amendment, though Commerce Clause is referred to by idiots as a "gunshow loophole" from time to time. We also have threads about the Fourteenth, Tenth, and Fifth Amendments all the time.

>> No.4433070

>>4433039
can you read or no?

>> No.4433071

>>4433064
>being this mad

>> No.4433073

>>4433064
>Implying I didn't flee during one of the first big brony influxes

>> No.4433075

>>4433066
Have they surrendered?

>> No.4433076

>>4433069
and stormshitters with the 13th

>> No.4433077

>>4433069
plenty of in the closet autarchists, as well.

>> No.4433079

>>4431292
http://www.abc4.com/content/about_4/bios/story/conceal-and-carry-stabbing-salt-lake-city-smiths/NDNrL1gxeE2rsRhrWCM9dQ.cspx

>> No.4433080

>>4433070
Obviously I can't. Why else would I be posting on 4chan.

>> No.4433081

>>4433065
....? Forget something? Image limited. I have a collection of Alton Brown gun porn.

>> No.4433082

>>4433073
I only go there for the Milky threads

>> No.4433084

>>4433052
>>4433051
>>4433054

Thank you for fortifying my arguments

>> No.4433086

>>4433058
I think it might honestly be easier to make one, or pay someone to. Or just steal some Stingers

>> No.4433087

>>4433075

They never admitted defeat or surrender, but the thread's just /k/ now, I believe.

>> No.4433088

>>4432787
>>4432824

Or it could like maybe be a deterrent like they have been for the past 50+ some odd years.

DURRRRR

>> No.4433090

>>4433066
>1254 posts
I think the battle is clearly won.

Do not fuck with our liberties because of your insecurities, ignorance of laws and reality.

>> No.4433091

>>4433066
I feel like we have just been trolling each other for the last 1000 posts

>> No.4433094

>>4433079
Damnit man, I want to go to Utah. I may hug a Mormon and ask them for tips on prepping. (It's part of their religion.)

Also they worship the 1911, which is admirable even though I don't have a personal preference for it.

>> No.4433095

>>4432897
I do hope that you understand how stupid you sound . I'm sure someone willing to believe that a postage stamp can off set a rotor has an overwhelming knowledge of rotary wing aircraft.
>Where battlefield 3
No; Iraq

>> No.4433096

>>4433087
Then keep pressing.
Let's try to set a new reply record

>> No.4433098

>>4433064

>...but I accept furry-plane threads
Do you even know Mountain Man?

>> No.4433099

>>4433091
I trolled a few myself. It was fun.

>> No.4433100

>>4433082
I used to only go there for the FSR threads...
I miss the old "family", I guess that's why night /k/ was to attractive...
And also ofcourse, the weapons...

>> No.4433104

>>4433071
>le trolling xD

>> No.4433105

>>4433094
Joshua_Graham.bmp

>> No.4433110 [DELETED] 

>>4433066
It shall die a fiery death, with /k/ posting til it dies.

>>4433071
>thinking im mad

>>4433073
If you have fully renounced your horsefuckery and pray to our lord and savior, JMB, you are welcome.

>>4433084
>like i give a fuck
Come Heckle my Koch, then we can talk.

>>4433098
>implying i accept any of the /ak/ or other drawn shit other than Willis'

>> No.4433111

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZF5wpntXsk

>ITT

>> No.4433113

>>4433105
The 1911 is the OFFICIAL Utah state gun.

>> No.4433114

>>4433095
ya he is a retard, probably why he left after getting told.

>> No.4433115

>>4433091
yea. I got tired of the repeating lame ad-hominems so I threw in a few more challenging ones for /k/,

>> No.4433120

>>4433115

My favorite was the CO2 faggot.

>> No.4433124

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhnUgAaea4M

>> No.4433129

>>4433099
>yfw you had better arguments than people who weren't trolling

>> No.4433130

>>4433110
/k/omrade, you are pretty mad
/k/ isn't what you like
Tastes, bro
Some people like horsefucking, others don't
Don't be so mad, you'd never know if i never spoke up

>> No.4433131

>>4433110
I praise him every sun up, and sun down..
Also, I support /ak/ threads, I like to not simply judge stuff by "It looks gay!"

>> No.4433132

>>4433129
yea really.

>> No.4433135 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II89bdIzquo

>>4433130
>still implying im mad
I'm thoroughly enjoying the libtard tears of /ck/

>> No.4433143

>>4433124

>HURR DURR THERE'S TOO MUCH CO2

Remember when the US was expanding West, and they set fire to forests to help clear the way? Fuckloads of CO2 then.

>GLOBAL WARMING IS A THING

Not realizing that there are heating and cooling cycles to the world. Not realizing there's been more than one Ice Age.

>NOT ENOUGH O2

Farm it, faggot. Seriously, make a terrarium.

>> No.4433144

>>4433094
John Moses Browning was a Mormon, it runs in their blood.

>> No.4433145 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J1ctr877qs

>> No.4433146

>>4433135
As am I, I'm still going to enjoy the horsefucking board and there isn't a thing you can do

>> No.4433150

>>4433124
>>4433143

Oh shit, sorry, didn't mean to reply to you. I forgot to remove it.

>> No.4433152

>>4433144
My state...... tried a Mormon genocide. Nobody's perfect.

>> No.4433154

>>4433143
that's also when every house was burning coal for heat.

>> No.4433156

I really haven't a problem with furrys on /k/, seriously not.
But when they start talking or posting pics about My little Pony, I could give up /k/ for this day and go back to my safe board!

>But I hate HATE furrys! Like I hate Animu and Niggers
>>>/opchan/

>> No.4433158

>>4433135
Oh, we're all enjoying them, /k/omrade. This is a moment to rejoice.

>> No.4433159

>>4433154
Most homes in 3rd world countries burn wood for charcoal, then burn that too. It's causing massive amounts of cancers and black lung shit cause they're burning this stuff without ventilation....

>> No.4433163

>>4433146
Amen

>> No.4433164

>>4431392
>I'm quite willing to kill - I'm just not a pussy who needs a gun.

That's right. I forgot about your 12,311 black belts and your hundred years of combat experience. I forgot about your over 300 confirmed kills and that you graduated at the top of your SEAL training class.

Also, I forgot that you can bench press 1200 pounds and triple-backflip into your collection of Italian sports cars while simultaneously making all female mammals within a 10 mile radius wet

>> No.4433165

>>4433152
REMOVE WHOLE GRAIN AND POWDERED MILK

>> No.4433170

>>4433159
Nigs gonna nig. Faster they die the faster we can turn Africa into parts of The United States of Earth.

>> No.4433178

VICTORY GUNPORN THREAD:
>>16038276

>> No.4433180

>>4431459
How is Ivan always right about everything?

>> No.4433186

>>4433180

He transcended human awareness through a combination of cheapest vodka and purest rage.

>> No.4433189

>>4431459
Love you, Ivan.

*salutes*

>> No.4433191 [DELETED] 

>>16038276

>> No.4433192

>>4433178
>deleted
Janitors=fags

>> No.4433198 [DELETED] 

>>4433192
>yfw its still there
>yfw /k/ is celebrating

>> No.4433201

>>4433191
The format is >>>/k/16038276 bunghole.

>> No.4433203

>>4433192
nah, i just fail at crossboarding
see>>4433201

>> No.4433204

>>4433180

Because he acknowledges that humanity itself is capable of both greatness and folly. Every one of us is capable of being both an insane asylum maniac who finds a cub scout troop and hacking up two or three in every scene. Every one is us is capable of fighting back and stopping it as well.

They refuse to acknowledge that bad shit can happen for no good reasons.

>> No.4433207 [DELETED] 

>>4433201
>implying i give enough fucks to get it right

>> No.4433209

>>4432666
>Self defense with a gun is a natural need?
Self defense IS. It's been that way since humans have been fighting other living things, get over it.

>There's no natural need for firearms
Nor for any of the things we make, according to your reasoning. Nothing is dictated by anyone or anything in nature or the annals of humanity according to "need", that relationship ends with the advent of new technology. Try to function in today's society without a computer or any technology, or clothes, or opposable thumbs (an adaptation for man's inclivity to invent, use, and adapt to tools), then make this argument. Also, let me know when you magically uninvent the gun and save the world with wizardry.
>And there's no right of self-defense in the US constitution.
Except the defense of the free state IS in the Constitution, and has been ratified by the Supreme Court by their interpretations of the 2A.
>Not to mention guns are very ineffective at defense, but that's another argument.
It's another argument because you can't substantiate it, you retard. 2.5 million lives saved annually by firearms, the bulk of which never even need to fire their weapons. Kiss my ass, you cognitively dissonant, revisionist pissant.

>> No.4433214

>>4432365
>more likely

You drive a car, you're "more likely" to run me over with your car. You shouldn't be able to drive a car.

so logical

>> No.4433215

>>4433214
BAN ASSAULT CARS

>> No.4433216

>>4433207
>gets mad at closet horsefuckers because stoplikingwhatidontlike.jpg

>> No.4433217

>>4433209
shhh, its over, we won

>> No.4433221

>>4432378
>>4432378
>You have no right to threaten the lives of children just so you can get off on "muh freedoms"

OMG DID SHE JUST SAY THAT I WANT TO KILL BABIES?

>> No.4433222

>>4431551
Huh, and I thought I was the only one who had noticed the children's pattern.

FYI: owning anything makes you have a small penis.

>> No.4433223 [DELETED] 

Gentlemen, tonight, we drink to the destruction of /ck/.

>> No.4433225

>>4433223

>mfw I have no alcohol

>> No.4433226

>>4433223
AAMEEEN

>> No.4433229

>>4433005
But... But... Muh [white] chilluns!!!!

>> No.4433235

>>4431392
Why do you liberals want children to die so badly? Why do Democrats hate kids so much? Why were almost all of mass-shooters (Virginia Tech, Lanza, Holmes, Columbine shooters, etc.) such rabid leftists and raging Democrats (Lanza campaigned for Obama)?

This gnosis is revealing itself, you odious, murderous fuck.

>> No.4433236

>>4433036
A million times this. School doors are impossible to get into if they are locked.

>> No.4433238

>>4433236
wut...no they're not

>> No.4433241

>>4433217
But... B-but...

okay...

>> No.4433244

>>4433235
Then throw in abortion to the mix, as well as their overwhelming love of government-controlled everything.

Let's completely forget how many foster children get fucked over repeatedly because the Government can't do a single job right.

>> No.4433246 [DELETED] 

>>4433225
>>4433226
We drink nao.
>>>/k/16038606

>> No.4433250

>>4433236
LOL
no they arent.
all throughout elementary all the way to highschool i would constantly leave campus

>> No.4433252

>>4433235
Ah shit, I meant Holmes campaigned for Obama. I'm sorry, I get so upset when these fuckers threaten kids.

>> No.4433254

>>4431602
Not "if", people go to jail for cp.. you might wanna wipe your hard drive and take a long swim in your pool. I'll let you know when you can come out.

>> No.4433256

>>4431722
yes because home invasions are not a common thing at all!

>> No.4433257

Damn, this is a really long debate.

>> No.4433258

>>4433094
Don't forget some of the best gun laws in the US.

>> No.4433259

>>4433238
yes, they are

unless you go full T-100 you're not getting in.

>> No.4433263

>>4433258
You guys have some Rockies there too, right? Salt flats AND mountains? And guns. Lots of guns. And a glorious American doomsday cult army.


.... damnit. I really want to move.

>> No.4433264

>>4433036
The door was locked, so he shot out the glass and then unlocked it.

>> No.4433266

>>4431384
>Implying coups are only possible with RPGs
>Implying we don't have RPGs burried somewhere in soldered-sealed 50gal drums

>> No.4433267

>>4433259
I could literally kick in the doors of my old school. Do you consider locking your doors makes them impassible? Nah man, it is all about how long someone is willing to work at it. Same thing with safes.
Instructions to get into reinforced doors...
1.buy Ford Crown Victoria
2. place crash bar on front
3. ?????
4. Profit

>> No.4433270

>>4432666
>called the right to life friend
>we did evolve to produce and manufacture tools to defend ourselves in the absence of natural weapons
>clips
>congrats, you've just demonstrated that you know jack shit about guns, and have no qualifications to comment on them

>> No.4433273

>>4433267
Assuming of course that you cannot just break a window

>> No.4433274

>>4431616
Guns were not allowed in the theater, but wait.. people were still shot despite the fact that people can't carry guns there?

but guns not allowed, so there are no guns
but people still shot by gun
but guns not allowed
but peopl
durrr....

>> No.4433281

>>4433267
Also are you a faggot or are you just too young to know who the T-100 is?

>> No.4433282

The Williams-Sonoma in Boston actually pulled pressure cookers from their shelves.

They would trigger bad memories of the citizens as they sit in their cardboard boxes, clearly.

>> No.4433286

>>4433282
Hahahaha, under the counter cooking devices.

>> No.4433293

>>4431792
thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis

>> No.4433296

>>4433281
>implying you were alive during WWII
I was trying to be civil in saying that there is no such thing as security, if you really believe that a locked door is going to stop someone than you must also believe that a sign or law will do the same

>> No.4433297

>>4433152
Sounds like they tried to be, when they attempted to purify the Earth of that cult

>> No.4433299

You people from /k/ are pretty smallminded

When the Bill of Rights was born, the government and the citizen had the same weapons: Muskets and Percussion-rifles. Today we carry our Glock's and ArmaLite 15's, while the government has tanks, jets and other shit.
>People have the right to overthrow it's government
Back in the 19th century we all had the same weapons, but today we can't shoot down a T22 Osprey with a Mosin Nagant.

>I absulutely need 30 round magazines! What If I miss 10 times?
Than you could hit the 10 persons behind your target. There was a reason why select-fire Rifles were banned.
You are NOT a killer! You don't need to STOP someone with a stoppaahhn Powahh .500 S&W. A 9mm will do the job, too. If you don't believe me, than shoot yourself with a 9mm JHP and run 10 yards

It's absolutly OK to own and use a gun, but being a Gun-Nut faggot is too much! Show yourself a little bit more mature like Hanson Ong

>> No.4433302

>>4433276
why did you post that dont you know /c/k/ is going to ignore this

>> No.4433303

>>4433299

Says the slave to the free man.

>> No.4433304

>>4433297
Hey.... I realize that they're a doomsday cult..... but they're preparing to fight a thousand year battle vs. Satan's army before being taken to mars. They're really on the top of my list as far as religions go.

Their bullshit is no more unbelievable than normal Christian bullshit, but they're practical about it.

>> No.4433305

>>4433302
yes

>> No.4433306

>>4433276
>sage
ha

>> No.4433309

>>4433299
You damn colonials are so small minded, the crown is armed with massive fleets and highly trained royal guard, your musket cannot sink a single ship of royal fleet.

>> No.4433311

>>4433299
They had ships FUCKIN' big ones too!
And canons... But OH WAIT the revolutionist got ahold of those because THEY RAIDED THE MILITARY
and some of the americans serving STOLE THE SHIT...
What would keep that from happening again?

>> No.4433313

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433314

>>4431624
>>4431303
So noguns are real men who will always be safe because they can beat up everyone with their fists... and gun owners are the ones with the fantasy..

>> No.4433315

>>4433299
"USC TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > ?311 ?311. Militia: composition and classes (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are?(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia."

therefore able bodied men ages 17-45 are a part of the unorganized militia.

But that can't be right, How come people older than 45 have the right to firearms?

well two thing allow that.

the Second Amendment itself, and the SCOTUS ruling on DC vs. Heller.

I'll begin with the latter. SCOTUS ruled/upheld in DC Vs. Heller, the individuals right to bear and keep arms, regardless of militia status.

Now you might argue, that the Second Amendment does not allow for the individuals right to keep and bear arms. Let's examine the text.

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Upon first examination, it is not clear whether or not the people or the militia have the right to keep and bear arms.

Lets do a little thought exercise: "A nutritious breakfast being a part of a balanced diet, the right of the people to keep and eat cereal shall not be infringed."

Who has the right to eat cereal, the people, or a nutritious breakfast?

So, in conclusion, We the People (regardless of militia status) have the Inalienable Right to keep and bear arms.

Whether or not you choose to exercise that Right, is up to the individual.

1/2

>> No.4433318

>>4433311
Yeah people seem to forget that there is most likely at least two NG armories in their State

>> No.4433319

>>4433299
2/2

Now one might ask, "what about your AR15? Surely nobody has the right to one of those".

Well you would be incorrect.

Again, SCOTUS and the Second Amendment are our references.

I'll start with SCOUTS. This was the case United States v. Miller.

In 1938, the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas ruled the statute unconstitutional in United States v. Miller. The defendant Miller had been arrested for possession of an unregistered short double-barreled shotgun, and for "unlawfully...t ransporting [it] in interstate commerce from Claremore, Oklahoma to Siloam Springs, Arkansas" which perfected the crime.

That's important because the government's argument was that the short barreled shotgun was not a military-type weapon and thus not a "militia" weapon protected by the Second Amendment, from federal infringement.

Now what ABOUT those AR15s and other "assault weapons"?

Well if you ask me an AR15 certainly is a "military type weapon" and therefore is protected by the Second Amendment. The same is true for other "military assault style weapons" (Feinstein) like AK derivatives, semi automatic shotguns, and firearms with greater than 10 round capacity. Believe you me, the military does not use ten round magazines in their M4s and M16s.

So it is safe to conclude that "military assault style weapons" (Feinstein), are completely legal and therefore cannot be infringed upon

>> No.4433320

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433323

I'm a New Yorker and a NY Pistol Permit owner.
I had to get fingerprinted twice, had to take a mandatory gun training course WHERE I COULDN'T EVEN SHOOT A GUN BECAUSE HOLDING A PISTOL IN NY WITHOUT A PERMIT IS ILLEGAL, submit to a state backround check, a federal backround check, get interviewed, write a essay on why I need a gun, submit 4 references by non family members and non policemen that I'm responsible enough to own a pistol - mind you these people needed to submit their names, and write a short statement on why I am responsible, then had to sign my forms, and then I had to bring all my reference people into a notary and have a notary sign all my forms with them as witness.
I had to buy a gun to finalize my application, I could not even hold the gun, just look at it, and pay, and get the dealer to give me a slip to drive all the way back to my county court and turn in.

So yeah after filling out 1 million forms and doing all that shit, paying 20 dollars for forms, 100 bux for fingerptinting and liscencing fees, 15 bux for putting the gun on to finalize it, and the price of the gun

AND WAITING 11 MONTHS

I got my pistol permit in the mail.
I drove to my FFL and picked up the gun.
Shortly afterwards I bought another pistol.
I had to get the form from the dealer, turn it into the county, and wait 1 month to get my NEW license which included my new gun. Of course this costs like 30 dollars.

OH AND IT'S TARGET AND HUNTING, I CAN'T CARRY UNLESS I AM GOING TO THE RANGE, NEVER MIND THAT I'M CURRENTLY SERVING MILITARY, A VETERAN, WITH A CLEAN RECORD.

Now barring the fact that whenever I buy a gun I get a Federal background check from the National Instant Criminal Check System (NICS), and the clear fact that I've already proved to the state numerous times that I'm of sound body and mind, I still have to wait 1 month to get a new pistol.

Waiting Periods??? If I wanted to shoot someone, I'm not going to go to the gun store and buy a new pistol, Cuz i've got one

>> No.4433326

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433328

Oh hell, /ck/, never thought you would be this much full of pussies.

>> No.4433329

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433331

>>4432793

>Lel

>> No.4433332

>>4433319
THANK YOU. For fucks sake finally

>> No.4433333

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433336

>>4433323
this is the sort of retardation that happens with gun control, Gun control advocates don't know shit about guns, and stupid shit like this happens.

I WANTED to legally own a pistol.
If I just wanted a pistol, I could have driven to the ghetto and gotten an illegal gun off of someone.

>> No.4433338

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433339

>>4432378
You're the one thinking we can fucking own M-16s or anything else full-auto without becoming poor.

>> No.4433340

I love you guys. Thanks for making /ck/ a better place. I never go to /k/ but I may now

>> No.4433341

>>4433263
Shit we got the Rockies, and the Uinta's. And the Uintas are the only mountain range that runs West to East in the US. Also don't want too shoot at a range, Drive 20-30 min from SLC proper, and bam inna woods shooting.

>> No.4433343

>>4433340
we /c/k/ now

>> No.4433345

>>4431403
what do you know about penis you incompetent faggot?

>> No.4433347

I think this is the longest non stickied thread I have ever seen on /ck/

>> No.4433350

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433352

>>4432500
The Armalite Rifle-15 was designed for fucking varmint hunting, you retard. The military adopted it's full-auto variant, the M16, for various reasons, mainly because
> Muh space age looking rifle
> Carry more ammunition
> Decently accurate

>> No.4433353

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433354 [DELETED] 

>>4433340
Will you coo/k/ for us?

>> No.4433355

>>4431670
What the fuck are you talking about? Why would we need to wait days for our guns? Background checks are a minute or less(just had another yesterday). This is one of the god damned fucking reasons I hate arguing with you fucking retards! You don't know half the fucking shit you are talking about.

>> No.4433356

>>4433343
/cooking/kebabs/

>> No.4433358

Holy shit I love you /k/

>> No.4433359

>>4433345

>dat Freud
So what's scarier? The person who thinks their weapon is a penis extension, or the person who wants to take everyone's penis away?

(Freud Logic Mode: Fear of weapons, self-reliance, etc all stem from penis envy)

>> No.4433360

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433362

>>4432787
Or they could be a massive fucking deterrent like they've been since WWII ended.
That is literally the only reason we still have them.

>> No.4433363

>>4431403
I have a huge cock AND I own firearms. What now, bitch?

>> No.4433364

>>4431678
Yes, and you have a x2 small penis for owning both.

>> No.4433365

>>4433356
Dammit /k/

>> No.4433367

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433368

>>4433365

So what? It's accurate.

>> No.4433369

>>4433304
>no more unbelievable than normal Christian bullshit

Clearly you aren't well-versed on what they believe.

>> No.4433373

>>4433368
I'm praising you niggers lol

>> No.4433375

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

>> No.4433376

>>4432833
Well considering an AR wasn't even used in Sandy Vagina, and there is no discernible difference between a Ruger Mini 14 Ranch rifle and an AR-15*, you're acting like a fucking child.
> Muh feelings
Stop that.


* Except one of them looks scary and would be banned if we had another AWB

>> No.4433377

>>4433373
Still accurate!

>> No.4433384

>>4432089
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol30_No2_KatesMauseronline.pdf

>> No.4433385

>>4433323
The thing i'm trying to explain here with this post is...
That I understand that we don't want bad people to have guns, Gotcha!
Now that we've established that point, making people jump through 1000x hoops like I fucking did TO SIMPLY OWN A PISTOL, is the other edge of retardation, and it's exactly what gun-banning faggots want. They don't want to make it harder for bad guys to get guns, they want to make it harder for the average citizen to get guns.
They want disarmament.

Regarding the NY SAFE act which passed in Jan 2013.

It immediately made me a criminal.
I owned pistol and rifle mags of over 10 rounds.
Instead of letting me keep them, It demands that I destroy or sell them out of state before April 2014 or be guilty of a class A misdemeanor for every mag that I own over 10 rounds - which is a whole lot.
I mean like I have a FUCK ton of high capacity magazines - mostly acquired through military service.

I'm getting punished in the end, because some asshole IN ANOTHER STATE killed someone elses crotch fruit, when I had nothing to do with it, My guns are stored in a secure bolted down safe, and I've never had to defend myself with a gun, outside of the military..

Ex Post Facto much gun banners?

>> No.4433388

>>4431690
No, because his father is stupid, and afraid of objects.

>> No.4433410

>>4433385
Well your guns are far more likely to kill your or your family gun fetishist. We just want you crazy NRA mouth pieces to have some restrictions on all the assault weapons and high capacity clips so we can feel safe sending our kids to school, instead of worrying one of you autists will decide to kill our kids.

You don't need assault weapons, you don't need high capacity clips and you don't need stockpiles of ammo. All you fuckers are trying to do is compensate for your tiny limp dicks.

>> No.4433417

>>4431707
I knew people in highschool who drove without both. People do it everyday.

>> No.4433422

>>4433410
you are hilarious

>> No.4433423

>>4433410
1/10 are you even trying?
>clips
>assault weapons
>the small dick argument
>NEED

>> No.4433424

>>4433270
I got that too.
>30 round clips
I about lost it. Comedy hour in Tears Morgan's studio.

>> No.4433425 [DELETED] 

>>4433410
10/10

>> No.4433427

>>4433410

>I'm a faggot who is afraid of inanimate objects
>I make bad penis jokes

Whoop-de-shit. See the Freud post. >>4433359

>> No.4433430

>>4433143

>Remember when the US was expanding West, and they set fire to forests to help clear the way? Fuckloads of CO2 then.

Well, even more's being released nowadays and 99% of that is from fossil fuels that whose carbon wasn't in the atmosphere for a kajillion years.

>>4433154

And back then there were far less people

Anyway, I may believe in Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever that dude who invented the internet is calling it nowadays, but I'm a Progun /k/ommando and not a /ck/ leftard. I'm more than willing to have a friendly debate if you guys want.

>> No.4433432

>>4433410
plz tell me you set yourself up for someone to tell you your chubby ass doesn't need any more ice cream?

>> No.4433435

>>4431717
>You're right. Laws protect everyone and there have been no mass shootings or any sort of violent crimes, ever, because laws prevented them all.

>> No.4433440

>>4433430

And yet you ignore the global heating and cooling cycle. Way to go.

>> No.4433443

>>4431460
that is incorrect and you are dumb as fuck

can you manufacture *SUPPRESSORS? yes

can you own suppressors in some states? almost all of them

can you own one without proper paperwork? no, unless you want to be considered a felon

>> No.4433447

>>4433410
I'm single, college educated, live alone, am a veteran, and I store my guns in a safe, and keep my primary defense gun near or on me at all times.

If I have a tiny limp dick than I must have big balls because I was willing to do serve and do a tour in a hot hellhole overseas while you were doing nothing with your life.

Ie If my dick is tinylimp, then you have a micropenis son.

My guns aren't likely to kill me, they don't have minds of their own, the only way it happens is if I suddenly decide to off myself, not going to happen.

>> No.4433452

>>4431470

maybe the person has to live in their house with their bed ridden mother who needs help doing everything, and they cant move because you cant find a handicap house in a better neighborhood?

>> No.4433454

>>4433440

Sorry about that. I'm currently getting some sauces.

>> No.4433455

>>4432237
That is the dumbest thing I have read on the internet today, and I've been in this thread.

>> No.4433456

>>4433440
Even accounting for the natural cooling and heating cycles we are still releasing CO2 into the atmosphere at a quicker rate than in the past 2 million years of the Earths history.

>> No.4433457

>>4431748
I never say anything about black people at all. You racist bastards always bring it up.

>> No.4433459

>>4433447

Faggots gonna fag. They're the only ones who sexualize guns.

>> No.4433462

>>4433427
Hey, I'm just stating facts, something you gun nuts can't understand. You all have just been spewing all the NRA made up facts this whole time, it's time for us to stand up and take action. We will not stand for our children getting killed for you to compensate for your inadequacy and to fuel your fantasy of over throwing the government, which is a joke right? Since the government has tanks, planes and drones, and do you really think your little assault rifle can go up against the might of the US military?

>>4433432
Nice lack of attacking my perfectly sound argument. You gun nuts don't have a leg to stand on.

>>4433447
Since your a veteran you are FAR FAR more likely to go on a killing spree, since most of you have PTSD and when you guys get your hands on guns you just go crazy and shoot up the joint. Guns ALWAYS contribute to violence, and getting them off our streets is the best way to curb gun violence. Keep compensating though ;)

>> No.4433467

>>4433462

>hides behind children
>meat shield mode
>your rights end where my feelings begin

You fucking coward. The only person with an inadequacy is you.

>> No.4433468

>>4432151
I 'm guessing you havne't played hanako's route in KS yet.

>> No.4433471

>>4433462
You need to work on subtly Troll-san

>> No.4433473

>>4431519
like you're going to carry a baseball bat while walking through town

>> No.4433474

>Structured and formal gun debate general

>> No.4433479

>>4432086
>all nudity is porn
>a very well known historical picture (With a few /k/ additions) is porn
Retard.

>> No.4433482

>>4433467
I don't feel the need to use a killing machine to defend myself, a baseball bat or mace if I'm out and about would do perfectly fine without taking someones life. You gun fetishists just want to fulfill your fantasy of killing someone to feel like a man for the first time in life. You disgust me, with your assault weapons and high capacity clips, you don't need 100 bullets to stop a home invasion, which almost never happens.

>> No.4433483

>>4432284
So...you're just retarded. Don't worry bro, I believe tards have a right to self defense.

>> No.4433492

>>4433482
Troll-san you are still not subtle enough.

>> No.4433493

>>4433482
you sure are chubby

>> No.4433494

>>4433462
Compensating for what?

Show me a gun spreeing veteran who wasn't Charles Whitman, because I do not think you can.

>> No.4433498

>>4433471
>Implying these faggots aren't "jumping the gun" anyway...
And day/k/are shows its true face

>> No.4433499

>>4430387
first

>> No.4433502

>>4433492
I was for these guys
>>4433467
>>4433447
>>4433432
>>4433427
>>4433493
>>4433494
Autism speaks.

>> No.4433507

>>4433454

>http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-natural-cycle.htm
>http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

If you have any problems with the sources feel free to tell my why you think they're wrong.

Anyway: >>/k/16038276 Victory party!

>> No.4433516 [DELETED] 

>>4433507
We celebrate so hard, we need two threads to do it.
>>>/k/16038276
>>>/k/16038606

>> No.4433518

>>4433482

>unwilling to stop a known criminal from ever commiting another crime

Be kind to the cruel ones, and you're cruel to the innocents. Faggot.

>implying fantasies, implying masculinity

Says the person who fetishizes guns as a penis. Way to go, projection master.

>doesn't know what a home invasion is - when a team (that's more than one) of organized criminals breaks into your home and steals everything they can
>doesn't know that some home invasion teams prefer victims
>doesn't know that six shots sometimes isn't enough to stop ONE person
>doesn't even compensate drugs into the scenario - PCP faggots would be next to unstoppable

No, I want them because I'd rather be prepared for an emergency. It's called being sensible. Something you clearly are not.

>which never happens

And you are clearly never willing to accept the fact that bad shit happens for no good reason.

>> No.4433520

>>4433502
But anyone who has seen your trip should know you are a troll, an unsubtle one at that.

>> No.4433522

>>4433410

Yeah, you tell them women who own guns how small their dicks are!

Oh wait...

>> No.4433527

>>4432615
most police officers carry a gun just because its part of the job. they are not shooters.

the average gun owner is a hobbyist at very least and enjoys shooting and therefore does it more often.

basically, your average gun owner will outshoot your average policeman in almost every situation.

>> No.4433531

>>4433516

Oh, right. Thanks, /k/omrade.

>Tfw you'll stil accept me even though I believe in Global Warming

>> No.4433534 [DELETED] 

>>4433527
>average gun owner will outshoot your average policeman in almost every situation
Countless examples everyday, like that incident in NYC a few months ago

>> No.4433535

>>4431837
Well I hope you get your hands cut off, and die from the ensuing infection.

>> No.4433536 [DELETED] 

>>4433531
>yfw its real
>yfw my email

>> No.4433537

>>4433482
How fucking hard is it for libtards to just live and let live for christs sakes.

I just want to own a gun, go target shooting, enjoy the sport without getting scorn, or turning on the TV and seeing a bunch of talking heads complain about gun laws.

Honestly who fucking cares if people kill people with guns.
People kill people regardless, I couldn't give two shits about the sandy hook crotch fruit or jamal in the ghetto getting plugged, It's not my job to care, don't fucking impose on me and don't try to take away my shit, leave me alone, stop abusing the 1st amendment with your retarded bullshit and assault speech and keep your retarded feelings to yourself.
You don't want to own a gun? Fine don't. Keep this shit up though and the gun lobby will just keep pushing back with a vengeance until gun ownership is required in every home in america, then you can worry about MUHH CHULDREN when you fucksticks have no clue to operate or safely store a firearm get shot by your own kids because they hate you.

>> No.4433540

>screencap for posterity
>MFW SnagIt takes like two solid minutes to scroll all the way down

>> No.4433543

I'm a female gun owner....

how am i compensating for my dick that i don't have?

i have about a 5-10 min walk to work and need a gun so i don't get raped or robbed, or both.

it is immoral to tell me i shouldn't have the right to use lethal force in order to defend myself

it is immoral to try to remove americans from their natural state

I don't care how many children get shot up.

Obama kills many children with his drone strikes he personally orders and i don't hear the liberals whining about that??

>> No.4433545

>>4433536

>Mfw I didn't check
>Your email adress
>Iknowthatfeelbro.jpg

>> No.4433546

>>4433462
tldr. Facts- Something gun nuts can't understand.
No, you are the retard. First and last post itt.

>> No.4433547 [DELETED] 

>>4433540
Thats just confirmation of HOW HARD WE OPERATE.

FUCK YEAH!!!!

>> No.4433548

>>4433540
This should be archived

>> No.4433550

>>4433520
You would hope, i mean come on, clips, assault weapons, bullets and penis compensation. I almost threw in moms demand action but that would have been way way way to obvious.

>>4433518
>not citing story of woman who shot man 5 times in face with revolver and he drove to the hospital
>not citing police accuracy under stress, revealing even police suck fat dick when it comes to protecting you and your chilluns
>not citing defensive gun uses

Way to defend muh freedoms.

>>4433537
>implying gun ownership would ever be required
I mean come on, you can at least remain calm when refuting gun grabber bullshit, and my trolling was the absolute worse there is, I should have been wrecked more than sasha greys butthole.

>> No.4433552

>>4433543
>how am i compensating for my dick that i don't have?
>what is penis envy

>> No.4433553

That's still a tasty looking sammich. The dijon sets off the honey ham just right, imo.

Nice wheelgun, too. Don't get cheetos dust on it.

>> No.4433556

>>4433543
then you must be compensating for your small boobs

because women are supposed to manly

>dat liberal logic

>> No.4433557

>>4432440
Are you saying you actually feel threatened every time someone buys a gun? You live in a scary world friend.

>> No.4433559

>>4433537
>How fucking hard is it for libtards to just live and let live for christs sakes.
We're not gay migrant worker stoners. We don't count. Instituting SOPA for gun owners is fine because a lot of them are Teabagger Rethuglicans and we should use the coercive power of the state to smash our political foes in true fascist fashion. Anybody else is consorting with the enemy and is acceptable collateral damage. The precedents set will never be used to fuck with any of the other Amendments because why would my lovely Democrat-controlled government do that. And the way I feel trumps empirical data.

We are not dealing with rationality here. We are dealing with a bundle of libtard memes that have turned toxic and gone mainstream.

>> No.4433561

>>4433540
gotta say this operation concluded swimmingly, we operated the fuck out of you co/ck/s

>>4433543
i don't think they can listen to reason lady

>> No.4433564 [DELETED] 

>>4433543
>female gun owner.
>on the internet
Surely there must be a mistake here. There are not females on the internet.

>> No.4433565

>>4433550
>wrecked more than sasha greys butthole
uggguuu
so lewd

>> No.4433568

>>4433550
>wrecked more than sahsa grey's butthole
lol

>> No.4433569

>>4431941
that is just nope

CRIMINALS get their guns FROM OTHER CRIMINALS

they dont say "hey tyrone, lets go to a gun shop and buy a gun"

they simply buy stolen guns, or steal them

>> No.4433575

>>4433564
is ackshally donut

calling it right now

>> No.4433577

ITT: /ck/ deepthroats /k/ommando's hard long cock filled with facts and evidence


liberal don't know that their basically saying the american colonists were wrong to not disarm at the will of the british empire.

it's funny because liberals are pushing for all of our destruction, trying to take guns will only cause war to break out

those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.

>> No.4433589

>>4432481
If you are going to own firearms, please for fucks sake learn a thing or two about them. Go to a gun show, even if you just sit there going HURR, NO BACKGROUND CHECKS HERE GUISE. Right now you are just sticking out like that retard that universities let sit in on classes so they feel normal.

>> No.4433600

modern liberalism is a disease.

to qualify for this disease you need:

A. to be terrified of inanimate objects
B. to worship all liberal presidents no matter how much they screw up
C. to not know that modern liberalism is socialism in disguise
D. to be functioning on only a brain stem


liberals used to be cool up till the 60's

>> No.4433604

>>4433502
you didn't ruse me, i was asking if you were purposefully setting yourself up for a joke because i knew you were a troll

>> No.4433611

>>4433548
>This should be archived
Thy wish is granted.

chanarchive DOT org/request_votes

>> No.4433619

>>4432524
Why are you even on /ck/? Have you ever sourced your own food you fucking pleb. You carry a pistol when you go hunting to finish the kill without ruining the meat. And no, before you even say it, a single bullet rarely kills anything in a instant.

>> No.4433625

>>4433619
>a single bullet rarely kills anything in a instant
I suggest you switch to the 25-06. Everything I've ever shot with that rifle -- hogs, deer, cow elk -- dropped like it was electrocuted.

>> No.4433628

>>4433619

most bullets to the head will kill you instantly

doyouevenintoguns.gif?

>> No.4433630

>>4433619

.50 BMG will kill instantly

and yes most bullets will kill instantly if shot placement is right

>> No.4433637 [DELETED] 

>>4433630
>inb4 durrhunting with .50bmg video

>> No.4433646

>>4432845

Because we fucking ARE. We have a huge goddamn organised crime problem.

>> No.4433655

>>4433359
actually, i am not afraid of guns, nor am i afraid of someone taking away my guns


see, the thing is, people like you probably trust the government, probably trust the police. thats fine and all, but look at what hitler did

hitler signed into law gun control, banning all firearms from people, only letting lawlenforcement own them, and the military

whatever you put into law, criminals will essentially say dealwithit.gif and continue to break your new, absolutely not thought out laws, preventing what many normal, non law breaking citizens from doing what they love

what if there was new legislation saying that cooking with certain ingredients was illegal?
you guys would just be up in arms, and on that day, my fellow /k/omrades will be here to infringe upon your rights to cook whatever you want.

>> No.4433658

>>4431501
>butthurt virgin detected

>> No.4433669

>>4433637
One of the many things about the Danish weapons law that makes little sense
>A rifle chambered in .50 bmg is legal for moose hunting

>> No.4433672

>>4433669
>implying you wouldn't want to take out a moose at 1500 yards just because you can

>> No.4433675

>>4431501
>change hur dur
massacres are nothing new. if it isn't a civie doing the government is.

becuase war, war never changes

>> No.4433678

>>4433482
>clips

>> No.4433681

>>4433672
>Only close by countries with moose have laws against hunting with .50bmg

>> No.4433685

>>4431510
isn't that how the UK argues over the Olympic medals on 4chan? oh the irony

>> No.4433687

>>4433482
3/10 made me lol a bit

>> No.4433693

>>4433462
>stand up and take action
lol no
>government has tanks, planes and drones
because those are doing so well against the Taliban

>> No.4433718

ban soda it makes you fat

we should add food to the bill of rights

so they cant ban food so we wont starve to death

>> No.4433736

>>4431348

you're citing the arthur kellerman paper and you don't even know it. newspapers do it all the time, too, seemingly unaware that the kellerman study is a soundly debunked pile of shit.

this is a typical feature of antigun rhetoric. for example, the washington post took a poll after the recent gun bill failed, and found that only 47% of americans are disappointed or angry that it failed; more than half are indifferent or pleased that it failed. so what happened to that phantom 90% support base? well, it never existed. it was simply fabricated for the purposes of rhetoric.

the studies all show the same thing - resisting an attacker makes you more likely to survive, and carrying the right weapon makes your resistance more effective.

>> No.4433757

>>4433655
Hitler didn't propose too much gun legislation, the laws were already pretty restrictive by the time he was in power.

>> No.4433763

>>4433757
He didn't ban everybody from owning them either. Just jews...

>> No.4433765

>>4433299

You dense? Tanks, jets, and other cool toys (even drones) can't hold ground, and can't stand on a street corner and enforce no assembly edicts.

>> No.4433790

C'mon its almost at 1500!

>> No.4433797

>>4431380
an accurate gun is piss-poor to shoot people with, that must explain the islamists. By deductive reasoning beat to shit smooth bore AKs must be the best weapon out there for self defense.

>> No.4433803

>>4433299
>implying the US military would agree to kill its own people

>> No.4433805

>>4431303
>very few guns prevent crimes
citation needed

>> No.4433808

>>4432453
and.....

>> No.4433814

>>4432568
except handguns are used to defend ones right to live.

>> No.4433819

we're there

>> No.4433829

>>4433299
There is way more to war than air superiority. Pissed off people with rifles and ingenuity can do some impressive shit.

>> No.4433836

>>4433829
Aaand you fucked it up...
Next goal 1600 (not gonna reach it)

>> No.4433837

>>4433757
no, he proposed full on legislation, then confiscation of the firearms

>> No.4433861

>>4431394
police should have machine guns, gunships, submarines, tanks, and drones

>> No.4433882 [DELETED] 

>>4433836
Lets take this bitch to 1776.

>> No.4433888

>>4433882
/k/ommando standing by

>> No.4433891 [DELETED] 

>>4433888
Titty sprinkles.

>> No.4433895

>>4433891
Handgrubbers

>> No.4433896

SO IT SHALL BE WRITTEN SO IT SHALL BE DONE

TO 1776 WE GO

>> No.4433905

pop pop pop watchin motherfuckers drop.

>> No.4433906 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6J1ctr877qs

>> No.4433910

I pierce your heart from over 500 meters away

>> No.4433912

1776 fuck yeah

>> No.4433914

>>4432270
Okay. He steps into me with a knife and stabs. He has caused a bad, possibly fatal wound. But it was with a knife. I will not bleed out immediately, possibly not at all, if he has missed any major arteries or the heart. If I can survive and nutralize him, I can get to an emergency room or trauma center and survive.

As he is stabbing, I press the muzzle of my concealed carry against his lower abdomen or chest. To clarify, I have the barrel of the gun against his body. My concealed carry gun is a small, five shot revolver chambered in .357 Magnum loaded with hollowpoint ammunition.
I pull the trigger as fast as I can, emptying all five rounds into him in about three seconds. The muzzle blast alone, that is the concussive force of the rapidly expanding gasses from the fired round rip open his skin.

The first projectile enters his upper abdominal cavity, and the hollow point bullet does what it is designed to do and begins to flatten out, doubling in diameter as it travels. The shockwave of it's passage ruptures organs and shtters bone and on its way out it scoops out a six inch hole in his back.

I'm sending four more rounds into him in the next second or so. He is no longer interested in stabbing me. He is no longer capable of even standing.His liver, heart, lungs, possibly his spinal column and intestines have suffered irreprable damage.

He will die in moments. Even if I die, which, if i recieve prompt medical treatment, I probably won't, He is no longer a threat to me and my family.

>> No.4433919 [DELETED] 

Its about to get FUNKER in here.

>> No.4433920 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xC1J9T_xMrI

>> No.4433926

Keep going! March on to victory!

>> No.4433923

>tfw it'll either 404 or we'll all be banned befor eit gets to 1776

>> No.4433933

>mfw the meat from the deer i killed with my legally owned RIFLE is tastier and healthier than industrial farm raised beef.

>> No.4433939

>>4433933
Hey Mike, you still up in this bitch as well I see

>> No.4433940

>>4433468
Glorious Hanako. 2qt4me
That is all.

>> No.4433949

>>4433939
walt's a pussy. it was just a flesh wound. i was playing dead. he's going to fucking get it later. ever wonder why he was buying the m60??

>> No.4433951 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJo6c8rd_cU

>> No.4433952

>>4433933
so true

>> No.4433956

>>4431394

>police/rescue
>rescue

right...

>> No.4433957

>mfw mentally ill pacifists don't want any more rights than what hollywood tells them they need.

>> No.4433967 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xby2OgO1zsQ

>> No.4433970

>>4431392

If you seriously believe this you are even more delusional than most gun owners, That is just sad.

>> No.4433981

>>4431392
tell you what bro. go to a shitty neighborhood with your katana and try that shit on with the gangbangers around there. i'll wait here for your after action report.

>> No.4433984

>>4433882
https://images.4chan.org/k/src/1367192174000.jpg
Lasagna?

>> No.4433986

>>4433299
yeah man. because all of that air superiority is winning hearts and minds and squashing insurgencies. amirite??

>> No.4433988

>>4433882
His and hers... OC..
https://images.4chan.org/ck/src/1367193366558.jpg

>> No.4433990

>>4433986
and let's not forget bout that whole rolling thunder thing from the 60s either...

>> No.4433999 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvwBRzVEs1E

>> No.4434003

>>4433990
all that ended up doing was wasting bombs and we ended up losing to begin with. let's face it, the us military sucks balls at fighting insurgencies and fighting against guerrillas.

>> No.4434015

>gardener master race here

>>4433299
Who is Hanson Ong?

>>4431303
I carry a .380, therefore I am 10 inches soft.

>>4431309
That's def not a toy. I love getting fresh salad greens from my garden.

>>4432020
So syad.

>> No.4434019

This is gonna be a slow march...

>> No.4434030 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NE-m_9nD88U

>> No.4434032

>>4433988
>mfw we are actually 700 lb hillbillies, and I make homebrew from the yeast harvest from my beard

>> No.4434043

joke's on all a yall. i'm a 125lb 6'4" redneck.

>> No.4434050 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNNg5V8OfDk

>> No.4434054 [DELETED] 

>>4434055

>> No.4434055 [DELETED] 

>>4434057

>> No.4434058 [DELETED] 

>>4434056

>> No.4434062

>>4434043
I was joking, lol. Fa-Pings pic was our dinner a couple weeks ago.

>That feel when akimbo pocket 238s

>> No.4434063 [DELETED] 

>>4434060

>> No.4434067 [DELETED] 

>>4434067
Fucking shit.

>> No.4434071 [DELETED] 

>>4434072

>> No.4434073 [DELETED] 

>>4434074

>> No.4434076 [DELETED] 

>>4434075

>> No.4434079 [DELETED] 

>>4434071
>>4434073
>>4434076
FUUUUUUUCCCCCCKKKKK.

>> No.4434082 [DELETED] 

>>4434082
Get.

>> No.4434087

I have no idea what's going on right now.

>> No.4434104 [DELETED] 

>>4434087
I'm succeeding at shitposting.
>>4434098

>> No.4434107 [DELETED] 

>>4434104
>but its not on /k/ so i dont give a fuck
>implying i give a fuck when i shitpost on /k/ anyway
>>4434108

>> No.4434108 [DELETED] 

>>4434107
Alright, last one for now then I'm going for a run
>>4434110

>> No.4434111

>>4432568
Owning a handgun does not conflict with your right to live, killing you does.

Is killing someone with fire more of an infringement than killing with a gun?

>> No.4434112

>>4434108
But but... Muh 1776

>> No.4434113

>>4434107
haha, I was confused, too. See you later.

>> No.4434116

>>4434112
I know, I want it too.

>> No.4434123

>>4432462
And shooting bunnies

>> No.4434126

>>4432466
Never been able to eat spam :/

>> No.4434129

>>4434123
and bottles innawoods

>> No.4434151

>>4432370
>your hobby will be extinct in less than 100 years

That may be true. That doesn't mean it's right. We could also be a prison state in 100 years. Or society could collapse, and everyone else's hobbies would be dead, just like them.

Predicting the future out 100 years is not easy. What is easy, is knowing about the past. This is something that you have failed at.

>>4432370
>the republican KKK with their gun control
Now be a twit on some other planet.

>> No.4434155

>>4431409
>waaaaah people have different opinions than me

>> No.4434161

>>4431396
Holy crap that knife stuff the other day. We're all fucked if that happened.

>>4431409
>Have fun with your sex toy.
Where?!?

>> No.4434216

>>4432020
>calls himself poorfag
>post picture of sig
dude you're not poor. if you are, it's because you spent your money right and bought a glorious sig. I'm jelly

>> No.4434221

>>4431511

ITT: ignorant white kid who
1)Never been in a fight
2)Never been mugged at gunpoint
3)Lives in an upper-middle class neighborhood

>I've never had my life threatened, so why should YOU want to protect yourself?!

>> No.4434229

>>4432725
>And obviously I have, as I can state quite correctly the phrase 'self-defense' appears nowhere in the constitution.
Neither do the words "gun ban".

>> No.4434241

>>4434229
nor do "muskets" or "hunting and sporting purposes"

>> No.4434258

>>4432725
>And obviously I have, as I can state quite correctly the phrase 'self-defense' appears nowhere in the constitution.

No - but the words "necessary to the security of a free State" do

Which is why arms are protected

Oh, and that covers self-defense

In the hands of "the people"

whose right to keep and bear arms not only shall not be removed

but shall not be infringed.

>> No.4434284 [DELETED] 

>>4434285
Le shitposting Buttfucker has returned

>> No.4434285 [DELETED] 

>>4434284
So close, so far.

Check em.
>>4434290

>> No.4434288 [DELETED] 

>>4434285
Fail.

Le checkem again.
>>4434288

>> No.4434291 [DELETED] 

>>4434288
>Le checkem again.
>>>4434288
Le win.

Le checkem.
>4434291

>> No.4434292

Checkem

>> No.4434294 [DELETED] 

>>4434291
Fail get is got.

>>4434294
Le checkemwin

>> No.4434295

>>4434291
Wauw... You are really determined to get this...>>4434294

>> No.4434297 [DELETED] 

>>4434288
>>4434291
>>4434294
>mfw three gets in a row

Le check em.
>>4434297

>> No.4434300 [DELETED] 

>>4434295
le faggot. 4 in a row.

Le checkem.
>>4434300

>> No.4434306 [DELETED] 

>>4434300
>mfw 5 gets in a row

le check em.
Buttfucker is on a roll tonight.
>>4434304

>> No.4434308

>>4434300
lol

>> No.4434312 [DELETED] 

>>4434306
dawww.....

5 fucking gets in a row.
>le get guesser buttfucker

>> No.4434313

Check these out

>> No.4434327

We need Ivan..where is Ivan?

>> No.4434335 [DELETED] 

>>4434327
>the real Ivan
Dead.
>the new shitty fake ivan
Who gives a fuck.

>> No.4434340

>>4434313
Still about 180 to go

>> No.4434345

>>4434340
alright

>>443437

>> No.4434347 [DELETED] 

>>4434340
>189 to go
>3 pages left
WE NEED BACKUP, MEN!!!!!

>> No.4434348

>>4434340
What happens when we get there? Do we stop abruptly at 1776 and let the thread live on as a time capsule testament to muh freedums?

>> No.4434352

>>4434348
yes

that is exactly what we do.

the last post will be a grand finale

>> No.4434357 [DELETED] 

>>4434348
Stop abruptly at 1776 and then do the most American thing you can.
>walk out in front yard
>be wearing American flag as cape
>and only the flag
>cowboy hat on head
>AR15 in hand (1911 will suffice if no AR)
>scream at top of lungs "FUCK YEAH AMERICA!!!!!"

>> No.4434360

>>4431303
Yeah, I'm sure the guy who tried to mug me two years ago would have gladly put down his knife and agreed to honorable hand-to-hand combat over my wallet and phone. Looking back on that situation, I really shouldn't have drawn my CZ and told him to walk the fuck away. I'm so sorry to all the families and lives that have been ripped apart by my mistake.

>> No.4434363 [DELETED] 

>>4434357
>while wildly shooting into the air.

>>4434363 get

>> No.4434365 [DELETED] 

>>4434363
>mfw did it again

>> No.4434379

>>4434357
Will a shemagh and a mosin do?
(not American, I know)

>> No.4434383

Wanna sing a song to pass the time?

>Born down in a dead man town

>> No.4434385 [DELETED] 

>>4434379
>shemagh
Only if you wear it tactically. And nothing else.

>mosin
Nein.

>> No.4434386

>>4434383
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground

>> No.4434389

>>4434385
Deal.

>> No.4434387

>>4434386
>The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
Damn missing carrot

>> No.4434393

>>4434387
>You end up like a dog that's been beat too much

>> No.4434395

>>4434385
>>4434389
Only got a 5.5 air rifle nearby and I can throw stars and strips up on my laptop screen
Good enough?

>> No.4434396

>>4434393
>Till you spend half your life just covering up
Anyone?

>> No.4434398 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_ePGXBmtgk

>> No.4434399

CCCRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLLLLLLLLLLLLLIIIIINNNNGGGGGGGG IIIINNNN MMYYYY SSSKIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNN

>> No.4434404

>>4434399
THESE WOUNDS THEY WILL NOT HEAL!!

>> No.4434405

>>4434399
THHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSS WOOOOOOOOONNNNNS THEYYYYYYYYY WILLLLLLLLLLLLL NNOOOTT HHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLL

>> No.4434409

>>4434404
crap

>> No.4434411

>>4434399
>>4434404
>>4434405
Not quite what I was looking for...

>> No.4434412

>>4434405
FEEEEAAAAAAARRRRRRRRR IIIIIIIIIIIISSSSSSS HHHHHHHHOOOOOOWWWWWW IIIIIII FAAAAAAALLLLLLLLL
>>4434409
Indeed, you fakt ap

>> No.4434415

>>4434398
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WP8Texy1iM

>> No.4434416

>>4433543
Obama voted for infanticide twice when he was a senator.

>> No.4434422

>>4434411
i guess you are just COOONFFUUUUSIIINNGGG WHAT IS REEEEAAAAAALLLL

>> No.4434425

>>4433543
Every time a rapist gets shot and killed, an angel gets its wings.

>> No.4434431

>>4434422
My bad.

>> No.4434435

>>4434431
How's our count, DCB?

>> No.4434437

>>4433543
>muh drones
>MUH SEKURITY!

>>4433462
New rule. Anyone who says autism is an autist.

>> No.4434440 [DELETED] 

>>4434435
1776-1617=?
You do the math

>> No.4434441

>>4434422
There's something inside me, that pulls beneath the surface, consuming, confusing, this lack of self control I fear is never ending controlling I can't seem to find my self again, my walls are closing iiiiiinnn (without a sense of confidence I'm convinced that there's just too much pressure to take) I felt this way before, so insecure!!

Little did you all know I was a gigantic fan of the original Linkin Park

>> No.4434443

>>4434435
1618

>> No.4434446

>>4434440
Just 5 more!

>> No.4434447

so what'd you guys do today?

Besides post in the best thread for freedom ever

>> No.4434451

>>4434441
>was
so your edges dulled then?

>> No.4434453 [DELETED] 

>>4434446
You didn't get very far in school, did you?

>>4434447
Went for a run, and now I'm going to fap to Tori Black getting her rectum ravaged after I take a shower.

>> No.4434455

>>4434447
Ate some cold pizza.
Posted for freedom.
Wasted time that I should have been studying for my last 2 finals.

>> No.4434456

>>4434447
i missed getting quads

>> No.4434462

I want to shoot something and eat it.

>> No.4434463

>>4434447
Failed to study pharmacotherapy.

Fa ping also failed to study pharmacology.

I ordered mah sweet powder flask for my 51 Navy coming this week. That and read on placed to hunt in fl, and fantasized about all that rabbit meat I want to get.

>> No.4434469

>>4434451
Nah, their new stuff sounds like shit...
I can't help it, and people are gonna call me out on this...
But some of their songs really resounds into my own life...

>> No.4434470

>>4434453
how far did you run? i still have to go for a 5mile run tonight after im done digesting

>> No.4434473

>>4434463
>Fa ping also failed to study pharmacology.
Pharmacotherapy.
Pharmacology can suck my dick.

>> No.4434477 [DELETED] 

>>4434470
Not very far. Ran down to the my elementary school (1 mile round trip) and did some agility work. Had I not already run about 5 miles earlier, I would've gone farther.

>> No.4434478

>>4434453
I think school has fried my brain.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIJjYt-IBmE

>give it 30 seconds

>>4434473
Why do I always interchange those???

>> No.4434480

>>4434395
Sooo, is it?

>> No.4434481

>>4434453
>tori black
nice taste in women

>> No.4434483

>>4434347

Backup here.

>> No.4434488

[posting intensifies]

>> No.4434491

>>4434480
I'll take it. Just yell freedom.

All I have with me is a 91/30 and a p238. And a shemmagh . Wish I could go out with my sears break action and a cowboy hat with a sparkler taped to my dick. But there would be no neighbors to see over at my house :<

>> No.4434493 [DELETED] 

>>4434478
lol.

>>4434481
>did you know?
Lexi Belle now does anal.

>> No.4434495

>>4434491
What about the saggy old whore across the street? You'd be paying her back for showing you her draggly tits.

>> No.4434497

>>4434493
she does?

I gotta get in on that, but it's probably with niggers

>> No.4434499

>>4434491
Ah fair enough... I can't really yell though... I'll whispell!
Living in a farm complex with 6 apartments in it has its draw backs...
No "freedom" shouting in the middle of the night...

>> No.4434502

>>4434495
I mean my parents place, in da boonies.

>> No.4434506

>>4434499
Farm complex?? That sounds cool!

>> No.4434508

Fuck, how many more motherfucking posts do we have to do again?

>> No.4434512

>>4434499
>Living in a farm complex
migrant worker?

>> No.4434514

>>4434508
to 1776

or 128 more posts after mine

>> No.4434516

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIJjYt-IBmE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDVQ09ESjAo

>texas based supremacy

>> No.4434519 [DELETED] 

>>4434497
Nope.
imgurNOTHINGHEREcom/r/nsfw_gifs/oUTuX

>> No.4434521

>>4434506
Indeed, its an old really big farm, where the farm part has been rented out
And there are 3 buildings with 2 apartments in each...
Pretty special stuff
>>4434512
Nah, been living in this country my entire life,
and of native origin...
(Not American, simply supporting /k/'s 'Merifags

>> No.4434522

>>4434514

Oh. So, how many people are left? Is it just me, you, David and the Buttfucker guy?

>> No.4434523

>>4434522
I think so

>> No.4434525

>>4432478
It was in quotes you fuck, meaning sarcastically.
Also, please stay in /ck/, we're fucking sick of you in /k/. Better yet, go to /b/. You'll fit in more.

>> No.4434528

>>4431515
>Ummm except they don't. The EU and Canada both have lower violent crime rates than the US.
>Your ass is not a source

You were saying?

>> No.4434532

>>4434522
I am here as well! >>4434521
The non-american support crew member

>> No.4434534

>>4434522
i'm here, and i'll contribute to the cause

thanks again guys. i haven't laughed this hard in a long time.

>> No.4434536

>>4434523
one more

>> No.4434537

>>4434532
Wooooooo freedom for the world

>> No.4434540

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQRt5E-JJfg

>> No.4434544

Anyone ever eaten at a Cheddars? We're getting one in town.

>> No.4434545

>>4434537
Freedom errywear!

>> No.4434546

>>4434532
>>4434522

let freedom ring

>> No.4434549

>>4434546
About 110 left! We can do it!

>> No.4434550

>>4434544
Never heard of it.

Menu looks alright though

>> No.4434551

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHTfz-CHlsI

>not country

>> No.4434552 [DELETED] 

>>4434522
>the Buttfucker guy
Its DepthChargingButtfucker to you.

>> No.4434554

anyone know how to prepare/cook a groundhog?
I got a bunch under my shed and they are wrecking havoc across my lawn

>> No.4434557

>>4434554
Stew, like a squirrel?

>> No.4434566

>>4434522
I'm Donghanger. David Donghanger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_FGk5OSSzE

>> No.4434569

>>4434557
Good idea, lets make it /ck/ related now that they've all left!
We are the true masters!

>> No.4434573 [DELETED] 

>>4434554
>kill groundhog
>tie in tree so its about 3' off the ground
>kill whatever goes to eat it
Do you even force multiplier?

>> No.4434574

>>4434532

Oh, cool. What country are you from and whats the gun laws like?

>>4434534

Welcome aboard.

>>4434536

Sorry for forgetting about you. No homo.

I guess I'll adopt myself a trip. I'm the global warming guy.

>> No.4434575

>>4434554
This is ck after all. Stewing sounds about right.

>mfw I have never into hunting. so sad having to learn to hunt as an adult

>> No.4434577

102 left

>> No.4434579 [DELETED] 

TIE MY PECKER TO MY LEG!!!!!!!

>> No.4434580

>>4434574
lel, that's a girl

>> No.4434583 [DELETED] 

99 to go

>> No.4434584

>>4434579
I'D EAT A YARD OF HER SHIT JUST TO WATCH HER CUM.

>> No.4434588

So close guise

>> No.4434590 [DELETED] 

>>4434580
You mean LoIR?

>>4434584
A square yard or just a yard in a line?

>> No.4434591

>>4434574
Denmark, shit-tier but mostly easy to get around
though
>2 years in a shooting club to get a handgun
>Self defense? Nah we call that murder. In your own house? We don't give a fuck
>Semi-auto? 2 rounds mag cap!

>> No.4434595

>>4434590
>A square yard or just a yard in a line?
Cubic

>> No.4434596 [DELETED] 

>>4434595
>mfw

>> No.4434598

>>4434595
Consistency of mashed potatoes?

>> No.4434599

>>4434584
Also... protip: if she sees you do that, she'll probably never cum again.

>> No.4434601

>>4434575
>>4434557
yeah that seems to be the easiest.

I'm not sure if I should use my .22 or a shitty bow that I still have from when I was like 12. I live in a residential area and theres an elementary school right across the street. the .22 shouldn't be a problem on the weekends but weekdays theres always tons of people and soccermoms staying for the baseball games or whatever.
I tried cages/traps but i keep catching the same racoon in it

>> No.4434605

Any of you guys watched James May's toy Stories before?

He's the guy from the UK Version of Top Gear.

Really interesting show

>> No.4434606

>>4434574
>welcome aboard
>mfw i'm op
>mfw i can't post mfw

>> No.4434608

So DepthCharger... you've been leading this charge. You should take the glory last post. Do you have it planned? We're getting closer.

>> No.4434611 [DELETED] 

>>4434608
I was thinking maybe the text of the 2nd Amendment would be fitting...

>> No.4434613

>>4434606
oh shit it's OP

act cool guys

>> No.4434614

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWLL6I7lpFI

>>4434606
WELCOME!

>>4434608
fur reals

>>4434601
Airgun?

>> No.4434615

>>4434611
Perfect!
The perfect way to cement our victory today

>> No.4434617

>>4434611
Brilliant.

>> No.4434621

>>4434580

Oh.

>>4434591

Wow. That's... Sad, really. I don't want to come off as condescending or anything, but I feel really bad for you, man. I live in Nogunz NY, myself.

>> No.4434624

>>4434606
No OP, nothing to see here! Be on your merry way now
>>4434611
>>4434615

>> No.4434625 [DELETED] 

>>4434615
>>4434617
<3

>> No.4434626

>>4434621
I'm in California

We're about to transcend you guys in full retard laws

>> No.4434629 [DELETED] 

>>4434626
>tfw

>> No.4434634

>>4434621
Well, I guess we are both in bum country...
But for you, at least still in the US...
For me, most of the rules are pretty easy to get around from what I hear...
I just need my license to use it,
But I've heard that its pretty easy to get around the mag cap legaly of course...

>> No.4434636 [DELETED] 

>>4434615
>>4434617
Or, how about the entire Bill of Rights
>if it fits

>> No.4434638

>>4434636
Yes

>> No.4434639

>>4434626

Please go on. I'm intradasted.

>> No.4434640

>>4434636
Yes!

>> No.4434641

>>4434636
We'll have to start earlier than post 1776 then

>> No.4434643

>>4434614
nope
going to use supposedly subsonic ammo. haven't tried it out yet so I don't know for sure

>> No.4434649 [DELETED] 

>>4434641
I know. Checking right now

>> No.4434653

>>4434626
>>4434621
MD here
they are passing some retarded legislation. banning ar-15s soon. luckily im going into the navy and leaving soon

>> No.4434654

>>4434649
Maybe all should get a part in it then?

>> No.4434655

>>4434643
>Bill of Rights
I tried PMC Moderator in my Taurus Tracker, like a 6 or 6.5 inch barrel, during a thunder storm in my backyard. Still pretty loud. But not like a boom, people would likely ignore it once.

>> No.4434656

>>4434654
As long as we don't fuck it up, lol

DOI would be fitting for 1776

>> No.4434657 [DELETED] 

>>4434654
It'll only be two parts

>> No.4434658

>>4434639
Tax on ammo, redefinition of assault weapons to include currently exempt "rapidly reloaded" bullet button guns, .22s, grandfathered guns, and any with a removable magazine.

a 5 cent tax on every component of ammunition or ammunition reloading components.

Here's a summary http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=737510

>> No.4434659

guys what if we make a post for each amendment?

>> No.4434660

>>4434653

>Iknowthatfeelbro.jpg

Yeah, I'm also gonna move sometime. I was thinking Pennsylvania or Vermont.

>> No.4434661 [DELETED] 

>>4434656
DOI is wayyyy too long.

>> No.4434662

>>4434658
HOLY SHIT!

Fuck CA. Will that shit likely pass??

>> No.4434664

>>4434657
Okay, OP and DCB together then?
>Mfw we are talking in two threads now
>Mfw I can't show mfw

How about we all take pics of ourselves doing the honours when this thread is at 1776?

>> No.4434665 [DELETED] 

>>4434662
Hopefully not. Last years Bullet Button Ban got shot down, and these ones are even more extreme

>> No.4434667

>>4434662
It's California, so probably.

Also, he forgot that they're trying to redefine handguns as short-barreled shotguns so they can ban them as assault weapons.

>> No.4434668

>>4434658

>any with a removable magazine

Even if they're not Semi-Retard? Even Lee-Enfields and K31s?

>> No.4434669

I bring facts/statistics and drink liberal tears for lunch

>> No.4434671

>>4434658
apparently they are trying to ban led bullets too since a California condor ate some shit and died

>> No.4434674 [DELETED] 

TITTIES AND BEER AND GUNS AND HAMBURGERS

AMERICA FUCK YEAH

>> No.4434677 [DELETED] 

If you fellas don't mind, I'd like to stick with the original idea, since after all, this thread has been about destroying /ck/ on their turf about 2A
>meaning everybody stop posting at 1775

>> No.4434679

>>4434662
Unfortunately a lot of it will.

the one that redefines assault weapons almost certainly will, ammo tax probably will and so will the.

>>4434668
If I understand it correctly, it only applies to semis, but they'll expand it to include all weapons I'm sure.

>> No.4434680

whatever thread you guys post the screencap on post it here please. i haven't really been following any of the other /k/ threads.

>> No.4434683

>>4434674

>>4434674
BEER AND VAGINAS HAHAHA

BALD EAGLES AND SHITFUCK YES

HAMBURGERS IN MY FACE

MY PENIS IS BIGGER THAN AN AIRCRAFT CARRIER, MOTHAFUCKASSSSSS

TOUCHDOWN!

EXPLOSIONS AND PUSSY

WOOOOOOOOOOO

YES

SHIT YES!

>>4434677
SOUNDS GOOD TO ME

>> No.4434684

>>4434677
I agree...

Also

>>4434664
Anyone? Anyone?

>> No.4434689

>>4434679

Well, what about fixed magazine semis, like the Garand and the based SKS?

>> No.4434693 [DELETED] 

>>4434689
Garand seems to be fine, but SKS is always a target here in CA

>> No.4434694

>>4434684
Photos: I like it!

>> No.4434695

We're getting close

>> No.4434696

>>4434694
>tfw no camera

>> No.4434697 [DELETED] 

>>4434684
Where do you propose we do this? /k/? Or shall we shit up /ck/ with our patriotism and duty to protect the 2nd Amendment?

>> No.4434698

>>4434694
Good! Ending with 2A and pictures, in a victory thread (the 3rd)!
Everyone in? We've been working as a team so far

>> No.4434700 [DELETED] 

only 39 more

>> No.4434701

>>4434689
the new requirements would require that the receiver be disassembled in order to reload

SKS will probably be added to the lsit of prohibited weapons here

>>4434696
>>4434694
We're at image limits guys

>> No.4434703

>>4434693

I guess that's because it sort of looks like an AK, I guess. Anyway, I'm going to bed. I hope you all get to 1776 or whatever.

I'm going put my computer to sleep and make a web archive tomorrow (Macfag), if anyone wants it. Kind of a Moot question, because this is definitely going on Heineken or whatever that archive place is called. Good night, and have a wonderful morning, /k/omrades.

>> No.4434704

>>4434696
Paint? lol

>>4434698
So we make a victory thread in k?

>> No.4434707

>>4434697
>>4434701
>>4434703
>>4434704
Victory thread on /k/ I guess?
Also Getting close now!

>> No.4434708

[posting intesifies]
[freedom approaches]

>>4434707
sure

>> No.4434709 [DELETED] 

>>4434703
Later.

>>4434704
>>4434707
Who should start it?

>> No.4434712

>>4434709
I can do it?

>> No.4434716

>>4434709
I'm voting DCB. Just don't start it until the second we're at goal, or someone will fuck it up

>> No.4434718 [DELETED] 

>>4434712
>out of fucking nowhere
I vote it be someone who has been posting ITT for a while

>>4434716
>voting DCB
Me?
>mfw

>> No.4434721

>>4434718
>>4433882
cause related

>> No.4434723

>>4434718
Okay, that's fair I'll go prepair my air gun and window

>> No.4434725

>>4434718
You.

>> No.4434726 [DELETED] 

>>4434721
Uh... Alrighty then, unless anybody has objections?

>> No.4434728

>>4434718
>mfw I am the one who proposed 1500 and 1600
>mfw I still remain faceless..

Also
>>4434725
This then

>> No.4434729

>>4434726
nay

>> No.4434732 [DELETED] 

>>4434728
>yfw you realize 1776 is much more relevant to our country than 1500 or 1600

>> No.4434736

>>4434732
>mfw I am Danish, and 1500 and 1600 were simply counts,
To get it as far as possible
>Mfw faceless

>> No.4434738

>>4434732
i don't even know who posted the original crossover thread to /k/. i was at work and all of a sudden 100posts, then i got a customer and came back to 500+

do what you want

>> No.4434739

it's happening!

>> No.4434741

>>4434728
But you're efforts are greatly appreciated! That and DCB has a super offensive trip

>Where we are going, you don't need a face to have a face

>It's 1757

>> No.4434742

We draw near

>> No.4434744

>>4434741
Shit, bad grammer.

Okay, let's ease up now. What's the plan?

>> No.4434747

Slow and steady... nobody blow it.
Leave room for DCB. Maybe we should all stop early and let him take the last 6 or so posts just to be safe.

>> No.4434748 [DELETED] 

>>4434741
>super offensive trip
I'm offended.

>> No.4434749

>>4434741
Of course, not trying to take the honor DCB really fought for it...
I laughed, thanks
>>4434744
DCB posts 2A and starts victory thread?
No links to this must be posted since it would be fucked up quickly....
Also we must screencap it, I can do it and post it in the vic thread.. (Only the number of posts and the OP post)

>> No.4434752 [DELETED] 

Also, take your time. Bump it to 1771 and I'll take it from there.

>>4434749
I'm going to cap the 2A and reply count for the victory thread

>> No.4434753

1765 Stamp Acts passed

>> No.4434754

>>4434752
The plan is set, lets finish this!

>> No.4434756

FOR THE REVOLUTION!!

>> No.4434758 [DELETED] 

9 mo!

>> No.4434760

1766 Declaratory Act passed

>> No.4434762

>>4434760
>>4434758
>>4434756
For /k/! For Victory!

>> No.4434763

i'm going to request 2A and god bless america

>> No.4434764

1771... DCB takes it from here.

>> No.4434767 [DELETED] 

/k/omrades, today, you have fought well.

>> No.4434768 [DELETED] 

Today, you have fought valiantly.

>> No.4434771 [DELETED] 

Today, when dark times fell on /ck/, you rose to the challenge.

>> No.4434776 [DELETED] 

You fought back against tyranny and oppression, and you emerged victorious.

So with that being said, /ck/ I have but one thing to day to you.

>> No.4434778 [DELETED] 

>Amendment II

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

And don't you ever forget it.
DCB out.

>> No.4434780 [DELETED] 

>>>/k/16044985

>> No.4434790

I have been watching this since it started. God damn, the TOLD status here has broken the TOLD meter. God bless /k/ and god bless MURRIKAH!

>> No.4434950

hai guize

>> No.4434957 [DELETED] 

Titty sprinkles.

>> No.4434960

What the hell happened here. I feel like I'm coming on the wasteland that was a battlefield

>> No.4434961 [DELETED] 

Hey girl, I'm an astronaut.

>Oh really?

Yeah, my next mission is to explore Uranus.

>> No.4434962

>>4434957
>implying not fairy winkles

>> No.4434972 [DELETED] 

>>4434960
>feel like I'm coming on the wasteland that was a battlefiel
Well, you are. /ck/ got sent to Assdisaster, Nebraska

>> No.4434974

>>4434957
I like titties

>> No.4434980

>>4434972
I see that

>> No.4434985

All this because someone likes to eat Glock and Cheese

>> No.4434987 [DELETED] 

>tfw nobody liked my pickup line
I'm done bumping now, someone else take the glory

>> No.4434988

And this is reply # 1789- the year the US constitution went into effect. AKA- the year the right of the people to keep and bear arms was secured.

MURIKA

>> No.4435035

>ITT
>/ck/ gets fuckin told like scared little pussies

>> No.4435243 [DELETED] 

Welp, got banned on /k/ so I may as well drunkenly shit up /ck/...
SUCK MY DICK YOU CO/CK/SUCKERS

>> No.4435245

>>4435243
Holy shit, we DO have mods.

>> No.4435249 [DELETED] 

>>4435245
and they suck dick.
>modisafag.jpg

>> No.4435253

>>4435249
you are excellent

>> No.4435256 [DELETED] 

>>4435253
Excellence is what I strive for.
>even while drunk as shit
>thats why my spelling is so fucking awesome right now.

>> No.4435281 [DELETED] 

Shitposting? Me? Never.

Fuck you.

>> No.4435283 [DELETED] 

YOUR MOTHER LOVES TEH GHEY DONKEY CAWK.

>> No.4435357

>>4435283
Damn, dude. What happened?

>> No.4435452

>>4430378

>what kinda lunches do you guys bring to work?

tortilla wrap: salmon, mayo, pickles, oil and vinegar, hot sauce

>> No.4435665

>>4431989
You seem to be under the impression that the US armed forces would fire upon US citizens. There was a letter sent to the fucking president stating that something like 1000 green berets and other assorted special forces types would defect immediately. Not only would you have a large number of some of the most dangerous people on the planet running around, the armed forces are sworn to uphold the constitution, not mindlessly obey illegal orders.

>> No.4435757

Saving from p10
I got yer 6, probro.

>> No.4435830

>>4435757
Bumplimit is long gone. There's no saving this thread.

>>4435665
No to mention, any member of the armed forces that disregards their oath is potentially firing upon their friends, family, wife, kids, etc.