/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>16320581
>Researchers were unable to pinpoint a species.
Sounds like they have shit tests.

And this is surprising...how?

fake fish served on fake bread. Sounds about right.

>>16320581
Pfff that article reeks even more than an actual subway restaurant reeks

>>16320598
>fake bread
?

>>16320620
the bread is basically cake

>>16320624
isnt most american bread cake?

>>16320637
>subway
>american

super yikes

>>16320620
Irish courts ruled that Subway bread has too much sugar in it for it to be classified as bread for tax purposes. Naturally yuropoors obsess over this.

>>16320581
Notice how the NYT doesn't name the "commercial food lab" they commissioned the testing through, but when Inside Edition did the same thing 4 months ago and found that it was tuna they disclosed the name of the lab who performed the tests. I'd wager that these lab results are completely fabricated like most of the NYT's stories.

>>16320644
what is it then, chinese?

The one closest to me closed down and is now a bakery. Good fucking riddance.

>>16320644
Yes, it's from Connecticut

>>16320649
Furthermore, if you read the original NYT story the "food lab" said that they'd be unlikely to positively identify much of anything if given a sample of fish that was "cooked at least once, mixed with mayonnaise, frozen and then shipped across the country".

NYT is a joke publication.

>>16320649
>>16320696
Why are you trying so hard to defend Subway you fucking fast food addicted obese piece of shit consumer?

>>16320709
Why do you have a hateboner for Subway to the point that you promulgate debunked junk science by fake news publications?

have journos run out of things to get angry about so now theyre recycling controversies from like 5 years ago

>>16320709
correcting misinformation about a thing doesnt mean you support that thing

this is the bare minimum a sentient being should be able to recognize, you just failed the npc test

>>16320709
Why can't you just say Subway isn't great food and leave it at that? I don't see the point of talking about DNA testing your sandwich instead of just saying Subway is crappy processed food.

>>16320644
yes, in the UK it's called the tube, everywhere else it's called metro.

>>16320755
Why cant you just admit the nytimes is bullshit. Not a question, I know (((why))).

>>16320598
How.do you have fake fish?

>>16320709
>defend Subway
He probably just hates journalists with a burning passion, like any man should.

>>16320709
>one consumer defending Subway
>one consumer defending NYT
they both suck and are full of shit

>>16321615
or something that starts with J
Basically the same thing

>>16321599
do amerifats really?

>>16321631
Jandwiches?

>>16321599
>We catched too much delphines and jellys again
>Put it in the meatgrinder and call it ocean meat!

>>16320581
If they were unable to pinpoint the species doesn't that mean it could be tuna in theory? Unknown species doesn't negate any species imo

>>16322078
https://archive.is/4xJDL
>buy cooked tuna
>test DNA
>it's all fucked up because it's cooked and isn't recognizable as tuna
>sue subway for not serving raw fish
>???
>don't profit because the lawsuit is going nowhere

This shit was disproven ages ago, stop making bait threads.
>>16320624
And no you dumb fuck thats not how cake works

PCR test on cooked tuna with mayo and other shit added. Couldn't detect DNA from 5 species tested when FDA allows 15 species are allowed to be labelled as tuna.
To me this just sounds like people that don't know what they're doing trying to discredit them. Have they tried a control? Buying a whole tuna and preparing it like Subway does and testing it?

>>16321599
Based

>>16320709
Why are you trying so hard to defend New York Times you fucking politics addicted obese piece of shit consumer

Eat fresh...rat droppings

>>16320696
Makes you wonder what Subway did to get on (((their))) shitlist

>>16320581
Isn't this widely common in tons of restaurants and tuna products?

>>16320709
The chemicals in the food are used to brainwash customers

I've never seen the tuna tray even touched when I got to subway. It's an unwritten rule that it's awful taste and macros wise. I'm pretty sure they just have it for tax write off purposes

>>16320644
>american
>education

>>16320581
friendly reminder that subway is a company designed to make you sick so you go to the doctor.

>>16320624
But cake IS bread.

>>16321615
>>16321631
Based

>>16320581
Tuna is a valuable highly desired fresh fish. It's hard to believe any of the cheap canned stuff is possibly made with real tuna.

>>16322888
tuna is like thier most popular sub

>>16323822
nope.
nobody eats that shit.

>>16320581
LOL.
based. good unironically. tuna is hideously overfished i'd rather eat something else that still tastes like tuna.

>>16320581
Didn't someone do the same story with their chicken breast and get sued for defamation?

>>16320581
Here is a funny story - I ate nothing but burgers and fries for lunch and dinner for a year straight. I looked perfectly fine. I was not overweight at all. One day I decided, "hmm, I better eat healthy food - this can't be good for me". So I started going to Subway and eating that every day instead. I gained 20kg from all the ice cream and shit I seemed to just start eating because the Subway didn't fill me up. I also started to get more anxious.

Anyway, that was all a long time ago. I cook all my own food now. Long story short - how ironic that Subway successfully scammed everyone into thinking it was somehow healthy.

>>16320581
I was behind this fat lady at subway once. Her sub was super low calories. Low fat chicken, multigrain bread, no cheese. Then she got to the sauces. 8 sauces later....

>>16323911
Nothing you said is based.

>>16320709
You don't have to love Subway to hate lying "journalists"

>>16321965
Good name for a cheaper brand of Hot Pockets

Who actually goes to Subway? Aren't their shitty sandwiches like $11 now?

>STUDIES SUGGEST
>RESEARCHERS FOUND
>A NEW STUDY
>SCIENTIST SAYS

>>16320581
Subway tastes so shit and the consistency of all the ingredients is so disgusting, I don't understand why the place is so popular.

I would rather eat a MC-sugar-burger than this shit.

>>16323972
enjoy eating the bugs when the ocean is completely empty faggot.

>>16320581
wheres the follow up article about something being too processed or cooked to get any dna

>>16324042
we're running out of fish because of chinkoids devouring everything like locusts not because of tuna in subway sandwiches.

>>16320581
Oh good, an experiment! I'm sure the experiment has been replicated right? Right?

>>16320581
>Researchers were unable to pinpoint a species.
>In the tuna which has been killed, frozen, unfrozen, brined, cooked, chilled, flash-sterilized, mixed with mayo, chilled, shipped across four states, possibly cooked again, boxed up and shipped to a laboratory.
Gosh, next they'll be telling me they can't find recognizable corn DNA in beef.

>>16320654
Kind of ironic isn't it?