/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>16096969
shrimp are crustaceans, darkie

>>16096972
turbo cope

>>16096982
>implying i won't eat the bugs
nice cope darkie

>EWWWWW I WONT EAT SHIT
>still shitposts the same fucking threads over and over
Kill yourself bugman

>>16096972
Crustaceans are bugs

Shrimps have meat, flesh, muscle tissue....the same exact tissue we eat from birds, mammals, fish, etc.

"Bugs" as it were, have no such tissue in their body, they are exoskeletons full of liquidy goopy insides, which generally....such things are considered disgusting to humans, with many people even having aversions to any slimey, goopy food such as egg yolks or oysters. Regardless, one must be of.....remedial intelligence to assume that just because two types of animal share features such as beady eyes and multiple limbs that they must be the same thing inherently. This same logic would be to say that an eel is not a fish, but a snake.

>>16096969
I will not eat bugs (except shrimp). there, are you happy now?

>>16096992
>t. retard

>>16096996
eels taste more like snake than fish tbqh

>>16096969
Shrimps have some meat on them, and you don't eat the shell.
You expect someone to extract the meager amount of meat from crickets or ants? They will be ground up to paste, exoskeleton and all. The carapace isn't exactly nutritious or very appetizing, yet you literal bugmen will eat it with a smile since some "scientist" got paid off to claim it's healthy.
Eating bugs are for subhumans and starving slaves, any man with even a hint of pride in him would never eat bugs.

>>16097022
>Phylum: Arthropoda

>>16096969
the salt water in the sea keeps the water bugs clean and fresh, yummy!!!! land bugs are rollin around in da dirt and stuff, gross and icky!!

>>16096992
Crustaceans are not bugs, they're not even insects. True bugs are are a specific type of insect called the order Hemiptera, consisting of shield bugs, assassin bugs, aphids, froghoppers etc.
Crustaceans and insects are both arthropods though so maybe use that as the new meme buzzword

>>16097032
That just means articulated legs, same as mammalia means to bear tits yet you dont compare a bear to a human

>>16097032
>t. retard
See
>>16097050

>>16097054
I compare humans to bears all the time

>>16097032
lmao retard

>>16097050
>>16097055
Going by "True Bugs" excludes grasshoppers and locusts, the most common insects used in "eat the bugs" memes, to say nothing of cockroaches and arachnids. "Bugs" in the context of this meme usually paints a picture of (land) arthropods, which can easily be expanded to aquatic ones by bored shitposters when people don't articulate their point.

>>16096969
But what if I eat both? ;w;

>>16097078
>"eat the bugs" memes
Ah yes memes should take precedent over common sense and science

>>16096969
I don't eat any seafood at all. It's gross.

>>16097100
What do you eat instead oh fussy one?

>>16097089
You ask ten people to define "bugs" and you'd get ten different answers, likely with little overlap with the taxonomic group defined as "True Bugs". Common sense could easily include crustaceans as bugs using people's own definitions/explanations against them.

>>16097115
>Common sense could easily include crustaceans as bugs using people's own definitions/explanations against them.
That's not what common sense is
Your point basically boils down to saying the definition of specific terms should be made more vague and broad to accommodate people that have no knowledge of the subject.

>>16097032
oh man

>>16096969

>>16097032
Why did you include a photo of yourself?

>>16097050
"Bug" isn't a real botanical term.

>>16097115
>You ask ten people to define "bugs" and you'd get ten different answers
*Ten incorrect answers, unless one of those people actually paid attention in biology class/comes from a country with a decent education

>>16097136
>real botanical term.
Your bait is too obvious

>>16097136
>botanical

>>16097125
>"Eww, I won't eat bugs!"
>ok how do you define bugs?
>"[XYZ]"
>ok, shrimp and lobster also meet that criteria, yet you still eat them
>"no that's not what I meant!"

Is this likely to change anyone's opinion? No, because then they'd likely just add "and they don't live in the water!", but it's a valuable lesson on the importance of properly explaining your stance on an issue. Bugs as defined by the average person is an incredibly nebulous concept. If anything I would prefer them to use more specific language, though I only really care about this issue to get a rise out of people irl and (You)s online.

>>16097152
>>ok how do you define bugs?
>>"[XYZ]"
At which point you tell them that their definition of bug is wrong and that they actually have an aversion to eating arthropods. Stop accommodating retards

I might have developed a shellfish allergy in the last week. The thought that I might never be able to enjoy another succulent shrimp is making me want to kill myself

How does this thread keep getting replies? Everyone with a brain knows that shrimp aren't bugs or even close. OP even knows this. Stop replying to bait threads you damn retards

>>16096992