[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 484 KB, 598x732, EYqOB19UMAAX-_7.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15549374 No.15549374[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I asked this last time but has anyone been able to prove him wrong? His theory on food density seems fairly sound and I haven't seen anyone successfully retort his other point either. Seems to me like a lot of attacking his character rather than fairly evaluating the argument he's made I'd say.

>> No.15549390
File: 22 KB, 859x348, 1612683092535.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15549390

twitter threads are cancer

>> No.15549403

>>15549374
Movie Blob isn't necessarily wrong that said tray should be doable albeit unpleasant unless you're supposed to drink the soda too.
The issue is when he says "that's a fairly small amount of McDonalds for an average sized person"
It's still a fairly large amount of food, an "average sized person" does not often eat 4 hamburgers, 2 orders of nuggets, and two orders of fries in a meal.
Cinema Robert might but he is fat.

>> No.15549430

>>15549403
Thank you, I appreciate the genuine response. I suppose we just don't have the data to directly answer if it is a "fairly small amount of McDonalds for an average-sized person". However I still see no one addressing his theory on food density. Hard to disprove while ignoring a key component of the argument.

>> No.15549499

All of that food including the drinks is about 5700 calories, what kind of fat fuck thinks that is a "small amount of Mcdonalds". Thats like over two days worth of calories.

>> No.15549510

>>15549403
I can only hope that The Blob meant in the context of an eating challenge.

>> No.15549899

>>15549510
>giving blob the benefit of the doubt
You are a saint.

>> No.15550000

>>15549374
idk, 1 or 2 of those burgers would fill me up instantly

>> No.15550025

>>15549499
It’s a lot of McDonald’s for one meal but if you think that’s 2 days worth of food then you’re a eurosoy twink stick figure

>> No.15550030

>>15549899
This. He would have you and all generations of your family executed for even posting on this website.

>> No.15550344

>>15550025
you eat nearly 6000 calories a day? how fat are you

>> No.15550431
File: 81 KB, 1813x921, 1588479498264.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15550431

>>15550025
You think this is one days worth of food?

>> No.15550438

>>15549374
I'm a fat fuck and is feel sick as sick from finishing less than half of that food. Dude has got to be trolling.

>> No.15550446
File: 355 KB, 525x3102, 1591408186107.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15550446

>>15550438
He's not trolling. Fat people are fat because they are fucking stupid. They can't into math, don't understand calories, and have no concept of how much food they eat.

>> No.15550503

>>15549374
Physically dense or calorically dense? I would say they're pretty dense in calories

>> No.15550531

>>15550503
He claims that "The main reason fast-food cooks so fast and 'lasts' so short is that there isn't much density to it." I'm not sure exactly what he means by it but it sounds smart so I believe it until someone says something even smarter sounding.

>> No.15550559
File: 15 KB, 584x222, 9oFrv6f.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15550559

>>15550531
He is also smarter than the average sized person it seems. Correlation? He stays humble in his brilliance too.

>> No.15551431
File: 362 KB, 668x690, gross nagatoro.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15551431

>>15549374
Is this a bait thread or is /ck/ actually that fucking obese?

I eat less than half of that in a single day and I consider myself fat.

>> No.15551452

>>15551431
No. It’s a fuck Cinema Roberto thread. He’s literally the worst. Literally. Too much of a toxic ostensibly leftist cunt for even woke twatter.

>> No.15552051

I hate Mcshills.

Americans are the most obese people in the world, followed by several other fat fuck western countries.
The reason is simply over-consumption.
You consume more carbs than you burn, you get fat.

GOD in his infinite wisdom ensured there was a limit to obesity, because there were few super dense carbs in the world and you had to typically chase them.
But then Americans came, and made food with more calorie density than straight up meat
By modifying sugars, proteins and oils humans can no consume calories that would otherwise caught them to feel unwell or throw up.

Even those with very high calorie intakes will suffer from the over consumption of chemicals, sodium and saturated fats

>> No.15552389

>>15550025
I'm a 122 kilo 6ft fat motherfucker from Europe. I can't do over 3600 in one sitting and it will fucking hurt. So yes, it is over 2 days worth of food, or at least it should be you retard.

>> No.15552553

>>15549374
He heard the term "nutrient density" once and is conflating it with actual density.

>> No.15552558
File: 109 KB, 725x1024, 1610788768920m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15552558

>>15549374
5'3 and 106lb and I could probably do it, that said I'm a sperg constantly moving and burning thru energy so I'm generally constantly hungry. Still in one sitting I'd imagine I'll probably get thrown to sleep if I don't start moving.

>> No.15552564

>>15551452
L I T E R A L L Y
W
H
O
M
S
T

>> No.15552594
File: 105 KB, 650x558, 6bb92f872794d204793a2613e9cbd3b4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15552594

>>15549374
>I asked this last time but has anyone been able to prove him wrong?
You're going about this wrong. He has to prove his theory right. That's how burden of proof works.

>> No.15552626

>>15549374
This argument is like "the dress" or "yanny and laurel". One group of people thinks that he meant that this is a small amount of food, and the other side thinks that he's just saying it's small as in it's a doable amount.

>> No.15552632
File: 81 KB, 600x316, 20150312_mcdonalds_mcdonalds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15552632

>>15549374
Fast food doesn't "cook so fast" because of "density." It cooks fast because it comes pre-cooked, and they usually prepare a bunch of orders in advance, and fast food places have assembly line food construction down to a science such that even the laziest, dumbest teen can put together a burger in a couple seconds.
As for feeling hungry after, that's caused by the fact that fast foods are full of sugar and refined carbohydrates. After eating a big mac, you get a big bump in your insulin levels, which leads to a drop in your blood sugar levels. The end result is that this winds up making you feel hungry for more food.

>> No.15552667

>>15552051
>Americans are the most obese people in the world
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_obesity_rate
America is ranked 12th most obese country in the world.

>> No.15552677

>>15550344
Not guy but when pretty lean, 150lbs, 5'9 and eat 2,900-3,000 a day. But also do weights.

>> No.15552681

>>15549374
I could eat that easily if I'm allowed to puke afterwards. I wouldn't want that much cheap greasy shit in my stomach for long, but for a 3k bet no problem.
The hardest part about eating challenges is the monotony and that's got some variety to it.

>> No.15552694

>>15549374
>>15549403
>>15549430
I am 400lbs and I can tell you that this is not a normal amount of food for anyone to eat. I ordered half of this when I was real depressed a year or two ago on christmas and almost couldn't finish it. (10 piece nugget, large fries, double quarter pounder, sausage and egg mcmuffin, coke, coffee, and an oreo mc flurry)

I have no idea what he's trying to convey with this claim that fast food isn't dense but it seems fucking retarded which is a behavior that tracks for him. Meat is dense, potatoes are dense enough, bread is the only thing that someone could say isn't dense but it's definitely still there.

That said, you know I'd give this a try if it meant I'd get $3500 at the end of it and I don't think many people on this board wouldn't.