[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 663 KB, 1280x1280, 9B64CE9A-05E5-4C64-AED1-CC1E0E15DFCA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14398293 No.14398293 [Reply] [Original]

I have this beautiful 1 kg Ribeye and tonight I’m eating this for dinner.

This steak will be cooked【SOUS VIDE】and this thread is dedicated to all the haters and those who are curious <3

It will be cooked 3 hours and 30 minutes at 58C and seared with a torch.

>> No.14398302
File: 318 KB, 1280x920, 437F5767-89F7-437C-AC8A-174FADB73F9D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14398302

She’s in guys.

See you in 4 something hours.

>> No.14398307

Why that long? 2 hrs is plenty

>> No.14398335
File: 516 KB, 1125x1855, 50C89D4B-1CA7-4A76-B86A-A6FE7443BEF9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14398335

>>14398307
She’s 55 mm thick and I’m searing with a torch that will only cook the surface, if the interior temp is inferior than what I want it’s not going to be good.

>> No.14398466

>>14398302
edging, don’t keep us waiting, OP

>> No.14398503
File: 178 KB, 220x220, 3453.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14398503

>>14398293
>searing with a torch and not over charcoal
lol enjoy your average-tasting steak retard

>> No.14398563

>>14398503
Would it be different with a pan?

>> No.14398569

>>14398335
>torch
yes hello chef can i have a steak with the aftertaste of bunsen thanks

>> No.14398581
File: 320 KB, 1125x2436, 0B7DFE1A-43A1-4B13-B917-39B99909107C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14398581

>>14398307
It’s kind of confusing because the Joule app says 2 hours for a 5 cm steak while the chart here >>14398335 says 3 hours and a half for the same thickness.

The chart assumes that 4 hours are needed if you start with a steak at 5C and maybe the Joule app considers a higher starting temperature, which probably is the realistic scenario.

I don’t know but should you have any doubt just read here: http://douglasbaldwin.com/sous-vide.html

>> No.14398594
File: 2.69 MB, 480x640, IMG_5988.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14398594

>>14398569
If you use a toy torch that happens, with a serious torch the blue flame isn’t in contact with the meat.

My steaks have been torch taste less since when I’m using it.

>> No.14398713
File: 3.23 MB, 346x268, giphy (1).gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14398713

>Boil steak in plastic bag for 4 hours
>Blast it with a gas torch to finish it off

>> No.14398771

ITT anons pretend sure vide isn't the goat way to make steak

>> No.14398903

>>14398594
why not just sear it in a skillet instead of being a fucking boomer

>> No.14398917

>>14398903
Apartment, summer, hot, smoke.

I always use cast iron but this year I’m torching during the summer.

>> No.14398931

>>14398903
Using a torch is quicker and allows you to control the search a tiny bit better than the cast. Hitting the sides is easier too

>> No.14398938

>>14398903
How is using a torch any more boomer than using a pan?

>> No.14398950

>>14398931
It’s also more fun too

>> No.14399346

>>14398903
>using a torch compared to a grill is fucking boomer
ok retard

>> No.14399376
File: 756 KB, 2048x2048, F97CA029-92DC-4CD1-A283-97D192606015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399376

Before searing

>> No.14399381
File: 1.04 MB, 2048x2048, 4C68B53C-41A5-479A-96A9-9CAFF468238C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399381

>>14399376
Seared

>> No.14399392
File: 736 KB, 2194x1537, 1BB5FBD6-C21A-497E-8C75-C95D32FE16FB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399392

>> No.14399397

>>14399392
looking good anon

>> No.14399401
File: 1.06 MB, 2048x2048, 081E5736-EB6A-4048-8589-B3FD3F1E8BC3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399401

>>14399397
Thank you.

Sorry for the ugly light, my kitchen is horrid from this point of view.

>> No.14399406
File: 723 KB, 1536x2048, D1609C47-2189-4349-B9BC-23325D223D5F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399406

Lmao there’s a hair.

Let’s focus on the marbling

>> No.14399410

>>14399406
>PUBE.JPG

OP you absolute fool, here we fucking go :c

>> No.14399417

>>14399406
finished steak shouldn't be marbled you fucking turbopube turbopleb

>> No.14399426
File: 637 KB, 2178x1536, 3D6BFDAD-0049-4202-89CA-4B34225435EC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399426

And the dog is happy too.

This steak was super good, very tender with a moderate amount of juice (cooked at 58C). Zero need to rest.

Red Dutch Queen was the breed and this has become one of my favourites ever.

>> No.14399468

>>14399417
His steak obeys the same thermodynamic laws of the other ones you sperg

>> No.14399489
File: 175 KB, 752x799, 1566749584140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399489

>>14399417
why not

>> No.14399538

>>14399468
what are you trying to do? sound smart?

>> No.14399579

>>14399489
Based

>> No.14399615

>>14398293
There is nothing better than throwing a ribeye in a cast iron skillet.
All you need is virgin olive oil, butter, couple cloves of garlic, salt, and pepper.
Anything else is just pretentious

>> No.14399637

>>14399615
Making steak shitty is supposed to be ironic like nyquil chicken or blue curry

>> No.14399641

>>14399615
I didn’t do that but you can infuse the garlic (garlic powder though) and the herbs in the steak, however I’m a pleb and I like my meat as plain as possible with salt and pepper. Rosemary at best.

>> No.14399646

>>14399468
how well a steak is cooked is directly correlated to how well you apply the laws of thermodynamics to it you pseud

>> No.14399650

>>14399615
why would you cook a steak in virgin olive oil?

>> No.14399652

>>14399637
Seethe harder, there’s nothing wrong with that steak and OP did good.

>> No.14399659

>>14399652
haha no it looks like someone boiled a steak in a bag then blasted it with a plumber's torch

>> No.14399661

>>14399646
The marbling doesn’t magically disappear if you change how you cook the steak.
Either sous vide or pan both the steaks reach the same core temperature, and guess what the marbling is still visible.

>> No.14399688

>>14399659
And there’s nothing wrong with that.

>> No.14399693
File: 685 KB, 1280x1280, sous vide.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399693

>>14399661
marbling is fat and fat "magically disappears" (ie renders) at 58c so a steak cooked properly to 58c should not have visible marbling except for extreme examples like >>14399489

ops just looks like he didn't leave it in the soy vide long enough which is a classic rookie using a crutch misteak

>> No.14399703

>>14399406
>pubesteak

>> No.14399705
File: 633 KB, 1280x1280, 6F28732F-ACF6-46DE-B9DC-C097F71A9E94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399705

>>14399693
Hey anon that picanha was another one of my steaks too :)

>> No.14399713

>>14399688
Of course not if you like the look and taste of steak boiled in a bag. It's not something I would describe as looking or tasting good though.

>> No.14399716

>>14399705
too bad you don't learn

>> No.14399719
File: 286 KB, 1280x958, 1924796C-E831-4881-B22D-41B7E88B1EDB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399719

>>14399705

>> No.14399735
File: 404 KB, 1280x960, A58123A6-E7ED-42C2-B6CE-0FE2BA100707.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14399735

>>14399716
It has been in the bath for 4 hours, it’s plenty and more than enough.

Pic related was cooked in a pan long before I bought the sous vide machine and there’s still a visible marbling.

>> No.14399739

>>14399426
I didn't know dogs could safely eat ribeye bones. Good to know

>> No.14399751

>>14399719
double down on your shitty technique, that's fine too

>> No.14399773

>>14399751
Piss off Randy, but thank you <3

>>14399739
I held the bone while she ate the meat on it

>> No.14400781

SÖÖ VÊÊD

>> No.14401296

>>14399401
no ketchup? what is this, a pleb thread?

>> No.14401675

>>14401296
Bbq sauce would be ok?

>> No.14402597
File: 148 KB, 222x293, 1514169051171.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14402597

>>14398302
>boiling steak for 4 hours
god that's so fucking gay

>> No.14402782

Even a 5cm, 4hours seem too long.

Would also recommend trimming off the fat before the bath so you can put it in a pan and render it down and use it to infuse with rosemary etc and brush in after torching.

>> No.14402795

>>14398594
what has popular opinion done?

>> No.14403183

>>14402782
how tf would you infuse rosemary after sous vide?

>> No.14403273

>>14399406
I'm not a doneness snob, so if that's what you enjoy, good on you, but I hate all that unrendered globby fat inside. I prefer ribeye closer to medium.

>> No.14403447

>>14403183
Into the rendered fat, anon, the oil. Then slather the steak.

>> No.14403449

>>14399615
>virgin olive oil
that's fucking pretentious and is actually the mistake of a mediocre cook, or someone that's watched too many chefs on TV and has come to think that virgin olive oil is some premium oil that should be used in all aspects of cooking. It's not. It's an oil that should be used for dressing, for dipping and for cold dishes. It's got a low smoking point, and using it for cooking most foods is bad enough, but for a steak that should be seared over an extremely high heat, it's retarded.

>> No.14403493

I'm a great priponent of sous vide, but why did you overcook your beef so much? Heat it through at 51 or so then flash sear.

>> No.14403504
File: 1.67 MB, 320x180, 1406878649746.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14403504

>>14399392
Looks amazing ngl

>> No.14404149

>>14403273
Dude 58C is at the beginning of “medium”

>> No.14404166

>>14403449
Shut the fuck up and sit down you retarded cooklet you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about I guarantee that anon can make a better steak than any pedantic knowitall reddit faggot like you

>> No.14404183
File: 64 KB, 481x422, 9EEF8C33-CA45-4B5B-B112-9FF5D201BC18.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14404183

>>14402782
Will try thanks

>time

Baldwin charts apparently takes into account the time to reach a certain internal temp for the thickness (80C if I’m not wrong) 100% and it also considers the amount of time for tenderising the meat so.

Other sources display lower times like pic related (Stefan Gourmet) but they explain that the temperature has been lowered to 60C as well as other things that contribute to diminishing the final time, see pic related so basically they consider only the time needed for the piece to reach the temp based on the thickness, just that and they don’t add other variables, so if you take the meat out after the time in this chart the meat is 100% cooked and stable but the tenderising process hasn’t started.

>> No.14404193

>>14403504
Thank you, next time I will trim the fat away for a better presentation.

>> No.14404201

>>14404183
Forgot the link: https://stefangourmet.com/2018/04/01/how-to-choose-time-and-temperature-to-cook-meat-sous-vide/

>> No.14405181
File: 90 KB, 640x853, 1547237255466.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14405181

>>14403447
>infused
what a reddit word. does sound tasty though.

>> No.14405252

>>14405181
Speaking of Reddit, I saw a video from sous vide everything in which the bald man added a stick of salted butter to a bag filled with coffee beans and cooked everything at 40C for 45 minutes IIRC, then drained the now coffee infused butter from the beans and used it to baste a wagyu steak.

Watching this video my almonds activated and was thinking of doing the same thing but using fresh herbs rather than coffee, so I’d make a bag with 1 stick of unsalted butter and rosemary, sage with salt and pepper so I can made my compound butter.

I know that I can make this in a pan but using sõõ vįd possibly leads to a more flavourful result.

>> No.14405323
File: 207 KB, 1284x1045, 1579003482207.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14405323

>>14405252
>using sõõ vįd possibly leads to a more flavourful result.
more like jew be gay. groovy day? poopy gay

>> No.14405401

>>14405323
jesus christ what kind of retarded boomer comic is this

>> No.14405410
File: 275 KB, 1280x720, meat carrots.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14405410

>>14405401

>> No.14405543

>>14405323
Yeah I didn’t ask you name