/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>13545680
Yea, but only in croissantwich form like always.

>>13545680
seems obvious it would be at/near the bottom.

>>13545680
No

How does one measure this?

>>13545680
Data source: OP's stinky bunghole.

>>13545706
arbitrarily

>>13545680
Yes, because they rate extremely high on the deliciousness index.

>>13545680
Not sure I believe this shit. A coffee and a croissant will easily tide me over till lunch, whereas porridge just leaves me feeling even hungrier an hour later

I eat potatoes and oatmeal for dinner all the time. great food combo.

>>13545680
>satiety index
What does this even mean? How full you feel after eating said item?
>apple above anything
I love apples but that's retarded.

>>13545724
>whereas porridge just leaves me feeling even hungrier an hour later
eat double the amount and then see how you feel. do not add fat or sugar. add a fake sweetener instead, like aspartame.

Why wouldn't I? I can into moderation.

https://youtu.be/Wk0XYG15T24

>>13545680
i read safety index and was confused af

>>13545680
>whole meal bread 157%

WTF I love communism now

>>13545680
Nah, I only eat kwasont

>>13545712
Nope it's a peer reviewed source Ketard.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15701207_A_Satiety_Index_of_common_foods
>>13545760
Yes fiber carbs are more filling than fat proteins.
Everything facebook mom ketards tell you is bullshit.
Surprising. (Not really)

I figured yogurt would be higher. It makes me feel full for 4-5 hours usually. A yogurt and a banana can power me throw half a day.

>>13545724
>Not sure I believe this shit. A coffee and a croissant will easily tide me over till lunch, whereas porridge just leaves me feeling even hungrier an hour later
Fucking delusional fat ass.
A single instant oatmeal packet is like 160 cal and it's pretty filling.
Meanwhile a single croissant is like 270 cal and it's barely feels like anything.

>>13545680
Yes because I don’t only eat croissants for a meal? If I’m just having one with coffee I’m not looking to be “satiated”

>>13545715
Yep. These "results" are thrown right the fuck out the window as junk science.
I can easily eat two pounds of potatoes, but I definitely cannot eat two pounds of Mars bars.
Stupidest chart ever created, please never post it again. Fake science is fake.

>>13548317
Is this bait?

croissants are a nice light breakfast and the only decent thing to get a tim horton's that's under 300 calories

>>13547772
>says a croissant barely feels like anything
>calls anyone a fatass
Is irony lost on you or something?

>>13545737
>adding anything sweet to porridge
do Americans really?

I'm still going to eat croissants because they are delicious

What kind of GMO super apple is that? I would think apples would be one of the lowest foods, or at least fruits, in a satiety scale.

you bet your sorry beta cucked ass I'll be eating whatever the fuck I want you fucking potat

>again

>>13548317
ah yes because famously two lbs of boiled potatoes have the same number of calories as two lbs of mars bars

>>13545680
That shit probably came from surveyed answers. Right into the trash it goes.

>>13545680
Yes because they're fucking delicious. Either with ham and camembert, cream cheese and smoked salmon, or just plain, slightly warm, and dipped in coffee.

>>13549752
Not just Americans, most people I know in the UK, myself included, usually opt for some kind of sweet porridge. I like to add fruit, nuts, honey.

>>13549952
Fiber + water is filling brainlet

>>13551628
>That shit probably came from surveyed answers. Right into the trash it goes.
T. Ketard

>>13545680
Mars Bar rates much higher than I would have thought.

>satiety index
good lord. i'll have my petit déjeuner without having to analyse my satiety lol

>>13545680
White rice more filling than lentils...?

>>13545680
Let me have a laugh, show how you compute "Satiety Index"

>>13551788
Only for 30 minutes, then your body realizes it's empty calories and you'll be starving in less than 1 hour.

One apple wouldn't keep me full for more than 30-60 minutes. I think this chart only takes into account the instant fullness and not the actual long term satiety. Yogurt (real, greek one) would be a much better option

>>13551868
You determine the Fullness Factor, then calculate it as a ratio using the Fullness Factor of white bread as the base 100%

I've unironically eaten a can of bakes beans for dinner and I was completely stuffed.

>>13545680
Of course it's delicious

Why is anyone eating more than once a day?

>>13552841
Because not everyone needs to lose weight or lacks restraint in their meals.

>>13545680
no because gluten free croissants are shit
I can just eat a regular stick of butter on its own anyway

>>13551845
>petit dejeuner
>little breakfast
>it's just regular breakfast

>>13551845
i analyzed your gfs satiety index after she ate my cum and it was full lol

>>13548317
Two pounds of Mars bars would be well over 4,090 calories. Two pounds of potatoes would be more like 700-800 calories.

why come white bread isnt at the top ? its 100 percent ?

>>13553066
It's baseline satiety. Same idea as 0 being neutral pH in the middle of acids and bases. Or 100 IQ being average.

>>13547772
>oatmeal packet
Yikes!

Here's how it's determined since nobody's posted the real answer yet:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15701207_A_Satiety_Index_of_common_foods
>DESIGN AND SUBJECTS:
>Isoenergetic 1000 kJ (240 kcal) servings of 38 foods separated into six food categories (fruits, bakery products, snack foods, carbohydrate-rich foods, protein-rich foods, breakfast cereals) were fed to groups of 11-13 subjects. Satiety ratings were obtained every 15 min over 120 min after which subjects were free to eat ad libitum from a standard range of foods and drinks. A satiety index (SI) score was calculated by dividing the area under the satiety response curve (AUC) for the test food by the group mean satiety AUC for white bread and multiplying by 100. Thus, white bread had an SI score of 100% and the SI scores of the other foods were expressed as a percentage of white bread.
Paper goes into detail on the different precautions they took with serving the food and trying not to influence the different groups of test subjects along with what questions they were asked and at what times during the eating process.

>>13553123
>this faggot

>>13553147
What's your problem with information? That's how the values in OP's pic were determined.

>>13553075
>>13553123
thanks for the info friend

>>13553075
>>13553378
No problem. Just realized I was wrong about pH by the way (I am obviously not a chemist). Water is baseline / in the middle between acids and bases, but its pH is 7, not 0.