/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>12469879
It’s really hard to overcook Chicken. Stop sucking so hard

>>12469879
weasel

>>12469879
>Undercook it
>Die
Maybe with shit tier food laws. Also learn to cook, all you have to do with chicken is cook it until the juices run clear.

>>12469879
turkey

>>12469879
Chicken is second best to Pork to be honest.

If you cook a chicken wrong you suck at cooking and should not be commenting on such matters.

>>12469918
it's actually really easy to overcook chicken
your chicken probably isn't as good as you think it is

You're a fucking moron if you can't cook chicken to 165F.

If only cooking were not a guessing game.

>>12469918
It's pretty easy to overcook chicken actually. Like many light proteins, the 'wiggle room' on cooking is pretty small.

That said, if you nail the cook on a good quality chicken- crispy skin, juicy meat- it's fantastic. There's a reason roast chicken is the favorite meal of a lot of world renowned chefs.

>>12470088
I would make a case for pork being the most versatile for sure. You get super lean cuts, fatty cuts, braising cuts, skin you can crisp up, tons of delicious fat, it's good for curing or for forming all or part of the mix of charcuterie and sausages. It's really too bad so many people only know ultra-cheap factory farmed shit tier pork, pork from heritage breeds is ridiculously flavorful. Also pork is something a lot of people MASSIVELY overcook.

>>12470610

Pull the skin from the meat, rub it all with butter, salt, pepper and hit 165F. You'll never know a bad chicken if you do tat.

You can literally eat chicken raw if you aren't from a third world shit hole

>>12470617

Cook at 400 F at a close heat. I forgot to mention that. Broil at the end if you want. 30 minutes.

>>12470617
>cooking all the way to 165
Pull it at 155-160, it'll carry over as it rests.

>>12470644

indeed. I agree.

>>12469879
>inedible
Imagine being such a soy riddled faggot that you think chicken is inedible. You probably drink your coffee black and have your steak rare as well.

>>12470120
It's not so easy to overcook it to 'inedible' status. Of course you can always exaggerate and sperg out about what 'inedible' is but whatever. You fuckers complain about picky eaters and then lose your shit if your meat is even slightly more done than your preferred temp.

>>12470201
How do these things work, exactly? Once the inside reaches a temperature, it's good? That's it? Doesn't have to sit at that temperature for any amount of time, just get warmed up at all?

Is it weird if I don't like chicken thighs? I can eat breasts and wings no problem but thighs always don't taste that good no matter how many times I've tried them.

>>12471556
We're told that 63°C (146°F) is the minimum temperature at which common pathogenic bacteria start to die so heating food to 75°C (~165°F) gives it time to kill them off. Of course if you held it at 63+ for long enough then you would kill off enough bacteria so as to be safe.

>>12470950
this lol