/ck/ - Food & Cooking

You're hopelessly gay. Get a hobby.

>>12460121
Already have many hobbies. Also, you lack an argument.

>>12460133
Fine. You're gay stands as a statement of fact.

>>12460156
That sentence isn't even grammatically correct. Get out.

>I'm this
>I'm that
>Being that means I HAVE to like this
>I don't like THAT yet I'm this

Kill yourself with your identity politics diarrhea

>>12460171
Just stating a fact, I am Right Wing, no bones about it.

>>12460108
>Right-Wing
>complains about American Anti-Intellectualism
Does not compute.

>>12460201
>Being Right-Wing means I love Trump and Oppose Intellectualism.
Wew.

>>12460108
>why don't people like my idea?
It's not the finger limes people are put off by, it's your pretentiousness. That, and the tripfagging. The off-topic thread where you raged about plebbit was fucking hilarious, but solidified my opinion that you're a raging, butt-blasted, whiny little bitch.
Also, finger limes aren't a new thing. Stop acting like you're reinventing the wheel.

>>12460190
You are the vegan of politics.

>>12460257
You have absolutely no idea about my Secret Hybrid Lime so I might as well be reinventing the fucking wheel considering the cavemen like yourself on this board.

>>12460108
Because according to the right wing msm you're a retarded leftist if you don't buy all your processed foods from wal-mart. Just don't listen to hannity or anyone like him.

>>12460261
>t. Berniebro.

>>12460279
"Right-Wing MSM" is just Hasbara.

>>12460276
>secret hybrid lime
Go LARP on some other board, dude. You've made multiple threads about your limes, and it should have become evident to you after the second that nobody here has any interest.
Again, finger limes aren't new. You can fuck off now.

>>12460309
You lack heart. You don't genuinely love food. Just a typical "Muh hot sauce" poster.

>>12460309
Well they're new to me cause I've never heard of Australian limes

I, for one, welcome our new lime chef overlord

>>12460316
>all this implying
>all this LARPing
Go get gassed. Summer can't end soon enough.

>>12460108
I would say two things:

1. American "anti-intellectual" sentiment is actually "Anti-academic"
The right-wing has plenty of its own intellectuals, but the institution of academia is corrupt.

2. Leftists love to go online and RP as right-wingers. If you ever meet a right-winger online who seems to perfectly embody all the leftist stereotypes about right-wingers, then you've met such a person.

>>12460330
There's a whole Wikipedia page dedicated to them. They all evolved from the Kumquat. Also thank you for your welcome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_lime

>>12460343
Well, unfortunately for you, i'm here to stay.

>>12460345
Very good points. The academia is rotten. /pol/ is accepting of my plans for agriculture. I suspect Reddit has corrupted /ck/.

>>12460345
You do know that stereotypes exist because they're generally true, right?

>>12460385
They really aren't.

>>12460409
They are, or else the stereotype that everyone knows wouldn't exist

>>12460466
Like stereotypes about the Jews?

>>12460473
Yup, those are true too. I don't think they run the world but they are exceptionally greedy and subversive

>>12460409
Your lime threads are a stereotype faggot

>>12460473
Don't forget the stereotype about faggot Australians.

>>12460385
Yes and no. It depends on whether the stereotype is borne from ignorance or knowledge.

Ironically, for example, stereotypes about various ethnicities usually originate from people who have at least lived among them.
(i.e. no white American knows more about black people than a southerner.)

On the other hand, most steriotypes of right-wingers originate from a left-winger's rejection of their parents during adolescence, and then the stereotype spreads from there.

>>12460473
There is literally nothing wrong with being Jewish.

Do you support gay marriage?

>>12460482
Agreed. But as a Right-Wing person I don't think I fit the typical bill.

>>12460492
>hurrr right wingers are totally innocent and black people aren't

Just stop trying to gain victim status. All stereotypes about all kinds of people are usually true. There's no exception for your political party, faggot. Everyone is shit

>>12460498
Most people don't think they fit their stereotype, but they do. Because again, it wouldn't exist otherwise

>>12460488
>>12460491
>t. Amerimutt Trash.

>>12460497
Nein und gas.

>>12460514
Not even American, but boy, are you ever obsessed.

>>12460505
Are you winning your fight with that strawman?

Pretty ironic that your strawman is based on the exact stereotypes that I'm refuting.

Also ironic that a leftist would accuse any other person of "seeking victimhood" as a positive thing.
That trait is pretty much exclusive to you people.

>>12460133
>>12460190
>>12460203
>>12460276
>>12460280
>>12460287
>>12460379
>>12460473

>I don't fit the right winger stereotype

Oh, kid. You've got a lot of growing up to do

>>12460520
Where are you from else to possibly hate Australia?

>>12460521
You are truly delusional and extremely defensive. I'm neutral in saying that almost ALL stereotypes are generally true, but you just had to get offended and scream "leftist". Neither side is perfect. Deal with it, kid

>>12460108

>>12460526
But I also embrace things that Left Wing Hipsters love too.

>>12460497
Gay marriage is a human right and this kid is cringey as fuck. These are not mutually exclusive facts.

>>12460533
THIS

>>12460530
>intrinsically assumes that everyone seeks social benefit through victim status
>"b-b-but I'm not a leftist"
Here's another steriotype that is true: Almost everyone who calls themselves a "centrist" or "neutral" is just a leftist that doesn't like being associated with other leftists.

Hilariously, you can't even deny this without renouncing your own assertion that, "All stereotypes are true".

>>12460534
Cringe

>>12460537
No marriage is a "right", and that kid's sign is cute.
These things are also not mutually exclusive, but have the further benefit of both being true.

>>12460108
They're not limes. STOP CALLING THEM LIMES.
Also, what the fuck are you talking about????

>>12460534
>I like things HIPSTERS like.
Stop the fucking presses.
OP has discovered something never before discovered on this planet!

>>12460554
Yikes

>>12460549
Based

>>12460549
Maybe if keep calling me a leftist then I'll eventually be one.

Obviously the left plays the victim card hard, but have you never heard right wingers talk about any of the following:

>war on Christmas
>white genocide
>straights being oppressed by lgbt
>religious oppression for not being allowed to discriminate against gays

These are all prime examples of right wingers playing the victim card. Every group does this today.

>>12460576
Cope

https://vocaroo.com/i/s0EkDdSP8xuN

>>12460584
It's objectively true, faggot. Wisdom is realizing that most every group of people uses the same shitty tactics, the same kind of rhetoric, and they all think they're innocent. It's a fact of life that you might learn someday

>>12460592
Lol I’m brown faggot, can’t wait to stab you in the back. Cucks like you make me sick.

>>12460602
I don't know who "brown faggot" is

If you want to post an coherent reply then I'm waiting

>>12460586
Based

>>12460576
You're conflating "right wing" with "conservative" in all but one of those examples. (a problem which informs a LOT of the left-wing's incorrect stereotypes).

Conservatives are just progressives who lag 20-30 years behind. Its only natural that they would obsess over leftist double-standards and try to "use the leftist's own logic against them".

On the other hand, if you say, "White people are dying out, and that's just fine", the intent of talking about white genocide is NOT to try and win sympathy, its a warning of imminent retaliation.

>>12460108
Australians will never do anything that ever matters. Australia could sink into the ocean and no one would notice.

>>12460257
Look at this salty mad mutt.

>>12460592
>Wisdom is realizing that most every group of people uses the same shitty tactics,the same kind of rhetoric, and they all think they're innocent.
Kek'd at this.

No anon, "wisdom" is realizing both that "most steriotypes are true" while also understanding that, "no rule is absolutely true".

For example, you're correct that basically any group engages in shitty tactics, however, does it not make sense to you that a group who stands in direct philosophical opposition to the "victim mentality" would engage in "victim-hood strategies" far less often than a group that specifically endorses such tactics?

You have not gained some great insight into politics and humanity by realizing that, "Every group contains shitty people".

>>12460616
It's okay, you go ahead and do whatever mental gymnastics you need to to make you feel like your party does no wrong

>>12460642
But they don't engage in less victim hood strategies. So...

>>12460643
And you keep fighting with that strawman.

Also
>Your party
I don't think anything you've said has indicated your pleb-tier thinking more directly than implying that this is about parties.

That's the step that takes you from, "Misguided loudmouth" to "holy shit, he doesn't get it at all".

>>12460650
So say your stereotypes.

And you're going to keep being this stupid until you understand that the left has almost zero understanding of the right.

>>12460659
>>12460664
You poor little victims

>>12460676
>gets frustrated and abandons the pretense of rational conversation
Okay, you have a nice day.

>lime lebensraum threads failing
>start a "do Americans really?" thread
>instant success

>>12460685
I can't have a rational conversation with someone who thinks their shit doesn't stink

>>12460712
Neither can you have a rational conversation with strawmen, and yet here you are.

Now fuck off.

>>12460721
Didn't post a single straw man. You saying that I did is kind of a straw man in and of itself

>>12460749
>Man who is incapable of introspection cannot understand how he's being irrational
Stop the presses.

>>12460276
>>12460640
>angrily replies to the same post twice
Just looking for some attention, eh, kiddo?

>>12460108
>Is this just American Anti-Intellectualism rearing it's ugly head?
No shit, OP. Why don't you do something about it? Oh wait, you hate the intellectual class too for being "corrupt" (or maybe you just hate their politics, idk), too, meaning you hate both groups of people you identify with. It sounds like you can't do anything and just wants to whine about it on a cooking board, and it's working cause this discussion so far is completely irrelevant to food.

>>12460787
>you hate the intellectual class too for being "corrupt" (or maybe you just hate their politics, idk)
Not OP, but has it never occurred to you that allowing your academic pursuits to be tained by your politics IS corruption?

I mean, at the most basic bitch level, academics is supposed to be about learning something new.
So how do you do that when your politics already tell you all the answers before you start?

This is the difference between "anti-academic" (the reality) and "anti-intellectual" (what the corrupt academics call it).

>>12460857
>your academic pursuits to be tained by your politics
It would be corruption, but in many fields it is rarely if ever a problem. If you or OP have a issue with a specific field or department, like regarding a specific study or paper, then you can go on another board to validly complain about it. If you're OP who's writing off the entire academic system while praising /pol/, because they're flattered him over his ideas, then that makes you a pompous ass.

>>12460899
>It would be corruption, but in many fields it is rarely if ever a problem.
Yeah, "many". Not most. Not all. "Many"

I'm sure its a relief for the math departments of the world that the whole "proof is patriarchy/subjective mathematics" thing never took off, but that's a cold comfort to anyone who wants to study history.

>>12460133
Thought stopping cliche, nice counter faggot

>>12460929
>Yeah, "many". Not most. Not all. "Many"
That's a bold claim. Did you do a formal and comprehensive metastudy of the recently published papers in every field and sampled them with a well-defined categorization of "being biased by political views"? Cause if you didn't then you're just making a claim over your own limited experiences and emotions. If you did, you can publish it, and bitch about it on another board.

>>12460962
Shut up mutt. You’re getting grease on my topic.

>>12460969
>so this...is the power of a self-proclaimed right wing intellectual