/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>11323715
Go for it, bro

>>11323715
>How much do I owe you?
just trade me one of those broken onion rings in your bag

>>11323715
Either your firstborn son or your eternal soul, depending on the size of the fry.

>>11323715
It's nothin, bro. Just lemme snag a tendie

>>11323715
Nice try but it is still unsolvable :)

>>11323715
I need about tree fiddy

>>11323741
25

>>11323752
It's 70, you should have paid better attention in school.

>>11323741
70

>>11323752
>>11323785
>>11323787
It's 15, you morans

>>11323715
That will be $12.99 plus tax plus tip

>>11323785
Order of operations, multiplication comes before addition. Here's your (you).

Pic unrelated but what I'm hungry for.

Only if we can cuddle afterwards bro

>>11323741
Well, if you take into account the missing fry in the final row, the answer comes out to 60 times the square root of 2 plus 35 all over 7

A fry a finger, as is the law of the land.

>>11323715
Help yourself....I'm not a stingy motherfucker

>>11323715
Don't touch my fries, get your own, faggot.

>>11323723
A bro

>>11323736
Not a bro

What the fuck is money? If you're poor why are you talking to me, how are we friends

confusing post OP

>>11323795
this, based pemdas poster

>>11323789
10 for soda
5 for burger
2 for fry
17

>>11323846
Only one container of fries on bottom row, you moran

>You know the rules, Bro. ;)
>Haha, alright. One Greasy Larry coooommmiiing UP!

>>11323799
we cant get the value of the bottom one because we don't know the value of the paper bag.
truly unsolvable

Go ahead bro

I'm gay btw if that matters

>>11323741
13.5714285

>>11323741
it's 15

>>11323741
60

>>11323741
15.

t. math major, any job I want, 300k starting.

>>11323741
13.(571428) repeating
Drinks are 10. Burgers are 5. Each fry is 0.(142857) repeating.

>>11323715
The large fries cost me ~$2.12 with tax. Considering how the average number of fries in a large is 90, each fry costs ~ $0.02.
Give me a brojob for now and one for when I need my bro and we'll call it even.

>>11323741
Impossible to solve, but maybe we can get close with what little we know. Assuming only what is actually visible matters (so no tricks like saying the cups are of varying fullness and you just can't see it), the thing that makes this unsolvable is the fact that the second row does not provide enough information to figure out the value of a Burger (Let's call it b). We know that 2b + (Small Drink, let's call it s) = 20, but with no information on the value of a Small Drink we can only solve b in terms of s.

From the second row, the best we can solve for b is:
b = 10 - s/2

The third row tells us that b + 28 Fries (f) = 9. The best we can solve for f is:
f = s/56 - 1/28

Now we've got the fourth and final row, featuring the return of the Large Drink, the one item whose value we actually know: b + 6f * 10 = ?
Calling the answer x and solving the other items in terms of s, we get x = 10 - s/2 + 60(s/56 - 1/28), thus:
x = 4s/7 + 55/7

If we make the reasonable (but by no means certain) assumption that a Small Drink is some positive fraction of a Large Drink, we can place the following constraints on the items:
10 > s > 0
10 > b > 5
1/7 > f > -1/28
95/7 > x > 55/7 or more clearly:
13 + 4/7 > x > 7 + 6/7

Maybe I fucked up somewhere but that's as far as I go. Knowing the exact value of any of the unknowns (s, b, or f) would be sufficient to solve the rest. You could narrow it down even more if you assume f must be positive too, but still not enough to solve it.

>>11323716
FPBP
Anyone other response means you are a complete cunt brain.

>>11326420
When you can’t afford to send your kid to college then what

>>11323741
no one gives shit about missing fry; it's 25.

>>11326432
If you can't afford to send your kid to college, then don't hang out with friends and buy fries for them to steal?

>>11326432
then why are you eating out. fast food is only "cheap" compared to traditional restaurants, still at least twice as expensive (likely more if you're not getting the best deals, coupons, and combos possible) as actual cheap food

>>11326440
even if you ignore the missing fry, what makes you think the single box of six fries is 2? let's even pretend that single box of six fries is the same as the two boxes of seven fries each above, why would any of them be 2? you would have to assume the burger is 5, which would mean assuming the smaller cup is 10, which requires assuming that the smaller cup is the same value as the larger cup

thats a pretty big mountain of assumptions, much more than just "not giving a shit about the missing fry"

>>11323715
When in the pack, you share with the pack, and the pack shares with you.

>>11323715
Just take the whole pack you fucking ingrate

>>11323715
Someone touches my food I instantly throw it out, leave, and never eat with them again.