[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ck/ - Food & Cooking


View post   

File: 5 KB, 250x174, q5OL30E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11316060 No.11316060 [Reply] [Original]

>I'm a bit of a foodie

>> No.11316078

>>11316060
checked and reported

>> No.11316081

Hehe I too enjoy food ;^)

>> No.11316082
File: 15 KB, 480x480, 16938.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11316082

>mouthfeel

>> No.11317095

Everybody wants to face is Trump!

>> No.11317108

>>11316060
A lot of people think I'm weirdly unexcited about food, like I'm never really into it as much as they are.

>> No.11317188

>>11316082
Is there any difference between "mouthfeel" and "texture?"

>> No.11317895
File: 49 KB, 1024x649, 1518588283029.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11317895

>>11316078
Checked what exactly?

>> No.11317901

>>11317108
You should try taking more photos of it. Wait until you find out how many likes you get on Facebook.

>> No.11317970
File: 26 KB, 600x324, Hold_on_let_me_instagram_this.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11317970

>>11316060
*SNAP*

>> No.11319116
File: 46 KB, 306x513, IMG_1971.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11319116

>>11317188
No, it's the same meaning, except used exclusively by mouthbreathers. It's as stupid as saying 'fingerfeel' for touch or 'nosefeel' for scent.

>> No.11319250

>>11316060
>I'm a bit of a frogposter

>> No.11319320

>>11319116
You're wrong on 2 counts. You cannot describe liquids like beer or wine using the term texture. See the example in the following definition. Also, "physical sensations in the mouth" is a far narrower definition than texture.

mouth·feel
ˈmouTHfēl
noun
the physical sensations in the mouth produced by a particular food.
"this Cabernet has a dense, tightly woven mouthfeel, with complex, chewy, and velvety tannins"

Secondly, the term "mouthbreather" refers to knuckledragging troglodytes like you who think some words are a pretentious conspiracy to make you feel inferior.

>> No.11319493

>>11319320
based

>> No.11319498

>>11319320
Come mouthfeel my balls, bro.

>> No.11319620

>>11319320
>chewy
>velvety

Sure sounds like you're describing textures, mongo.

>> No.11319999

>>11316060
do people actually say this?

>> No.11320010

>>11319498
>taking the high ground
Good job anon

>> No.11320205

>>11319116
>KATAAAAAAAAARN

>> No.11320219

>>11316060
I prefer obnoxious instagram foodies over frogposters. At least the foodies don't shit up 4chan with stale content.

>> No.11320292

>>11319498
where you at?

>> No.11320495

>>11319320
Chewy is not a description of liquid. No amount of sommelier bullshit will make it any different.

>> No.11320502

>>11320495
If you have a better suggestion then by all means use it.

>> No.11320514

>>11320502
Any descriptive word that has to do with a liquids viscosity would be better. Using chewy is simply wrong.

>> No.11320644

>>11320219
>shit up 4chan
Oh my sweet child

>> No.11320651
File: 408 KB, 416x450, 1539048890586.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11320651

>>11320219
Oh really m8

>> No.11320671

>>11320644
>being so new that you honestly believe 4chan was always this terrible

2016 I assume?

>> No.11320837
File: 12 KB, 264x296, Yun.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11320837

>>11320205
You are my nigga.

>> No.11320926

>>11319498
based