/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>14695697

Vegans are never right, about anything. It takes wealth and privilege to even get close to a vegan lifestyle, much less to do so out of some misguided sense of morality. Nature doesn't give a fuck about morality; creatures adapted to eat meat do so, creatures that aren't don't. Simple as that.

> is eating meat immoral?

Is killing a man that is about to murder you or someone you care about immoral? In this case, "morality" is merely how society will judge you, rather than the overall benefit to your well-being or survival. That is not morality to begin with. Morality is about conducting oneself in the manner it takes to survive and prosper, not about the judgement of others.

>do chicken lives matter?

They are specifically farmed to be eaten. That is why they exist to begin with. Wild chickens of the past did not reach the size they do today and eating a chicken back in the old days was considered a matter of decadence because chickens could lay eggs and produce more food than if the animal was just slaughtered for its meat. Had we not engineered them to be big and have extra layers of fat, chicken wouldn't be the "cheap" meat it is today.

Same with cows, which were selectively bred from the Aurochs to be more docile and produce more milk for human consumption. Aurochs were wild and vicious back in the day and required the whole tribe to hunt down one of them. There is a reason the bull horns were considered a symbol of power and prestige in the Bronze Age; going out to hunt one meant someone in your tribe would die, as a given.

tl;dr Vegans are retarded, don't listen to them for any kind of advice. We clawed our way to the top of the food chain, so we should eat like it. Let the rejects not eat real food if it makes them feel better about things they don't understand.

Pic related; size comparison of an Aurochs to humans.