/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>13591707
>PhD in watching YouTube lectures
Try again

>>13092255
>the lipid hypothesis has been debunked
In your headcanon

>privation of fats causes a number of neurocognitive deficits.
No one is arguing otherwise, strawmanning

You must literally be a shill to be saying so much bullshit with absolutely zero substance

>>13039069
>It's the shitty ratio of LDL/HDL that is actually an indicator of coronary heart disease risk, brainlet.
So what do you think the ratio of LDL to HDL is in cholesterol and saturated fat laden foods?

HDL’s protective benefits are widly overstated if even existent
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/when-hdl-cholesterol-doesnt-protect-against-heart-disease

People with abnormally genetically high HDL have almost no cardiovascular protection
https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(12)60312-2.pdf

>Also, there is no proven correlation between consumption of dietary cholesterol and changes of blood cholesterol.
Yeah see this is the flat earther shit people were talking about

>The other anon was completely right, the sugar you eat in your shitty fruit mutants is 10x worse than any amount of fat you can consume.
LOOOOOOOL

Find one study, fatboy. Enjoy natural selection. Fucking fat retards act like fruit isn’t sugary in the wild to get animals to eat and shit out the seeds. Braindead monkeys

>>13021110
Basically but no evidence still. What does that even mean? What athletes are we talking here? Runners? Soccer? Football?

>and that if you're not obese/an alcoholic/a smoker/eating tons of refined sugar, there's basically no problem with eating animal products in a balanced diet.
Other than heart disease, cancer, chronic disease in general sure!

>How do you justify a vegan diet being healthiest when it literally requires supplements?
>orange pill baaaaad

>>13014278
https://www.atherosclerosis-journal.com/article/S0021-9150(12)00788-5/abstract
Not the precise specification but basically yes

>>13004530
What a complete word salad of nothing. Is rape also indispensable considering its longevity in human history?
>Most of those "meat bad" studies were epidemiological anyway, it's hard to even call that science
Spoken like a true scholar I see. Tell me, what part of this is epidemiological?

The ironic thing is, the exact types of studies you’re complaining about are what make up the OP’s risible study which concluded that the carcinogenic and atherogenic risks of red meat were statistically significant but they just recommend not worrying about it anyways, funny how that industry funded conclusion came about

It’s hilarious how you retards will endlessly question anything that goes against your narrative but when its “confirmed”, you don’t even bother examining beyond a clickbait headline

>>13002204
There is no lie, you are just a brainwashed retard living the lies of fish oil salemen. Your liver synthesizes cholesterol on its own from any lipid consumption, no dietary consumption of cholesterol is required, this is the equivalent of saying eat brains to help your own brain.

>>12939702
It seems that way because thats pop media narrative

>>12841922
>There is no conclusive proof that dietary cholesterol impacts serum levels outside of patients with history of high cholesterol.
Flagrant lie

>>12724807
>LDL is associated with disease because you can find it where you find cardiac disease.
In the form of arterial plaque..

>The problem, then, is not the cholesterol, but what you're doing that causes high numbers of LDL particles to carry it around in your blood.
Like saturated fat and dietary cholesterol consumption

>The problem, then, is not the cholesterol, but what you're doing that causes high numbers of LDL particles to carry it around in your blood. Eating too much processed grain and starchy carbs spikes insulin, causing weak spots in your inflamed arteries,
What a disingenuous load of shit, dietary cholesterol CLEARLY raises serum cholesterol. Insulin spikes alone do not cause arterial damage, otherwise your hypothesis falls apart on itself when insulogenic foods like eggs with their protein would raise insulin. The problem with insulin is the subsequent falls, that’s where refined sugars cause drastic falls and spike blood sugar which can cause arterial damage and oxidize cholesterol. You are wholly misleading people deliberately

>About 25% of people or fewer are considered "hyperresponders" who are extremely sensitive to dietary cholesterol. This condition is thought to be genetic and heritable. This subset of people would hypothetically benefit from limiting dietary cholesterol but only because they're genetic trash, not because it is inherently bad.
Oh my god you are literally a paid shill aren’t you? Hyperresponders is a nonexistent concept literally fabricated bt researchers on the egg industry payroll to explain “abnormalities” in their studies of cholesterol when people would actually RESPOND to cholesterol. Everybody is a “hyperresponder”, what those snakes like you did was take people with a high baseline serum cholesterol and feed them high amounts which would change their serum very little and claim this was proof dietary cholesterol was irrelevant. Or measure their fasting serum levels. Fraudulent bullshit.

>>12537767
Oh look, fat wittle wetarded babby got blown the fuck out, how sad :(

Might want to get your weight checked you obese fuck LMAO

>>12525464

Not a myth, your blood is boiling because you’re a fat retard hocking down eggs

I shouldn’t even need to explain your retarded shit about milk, its breast milk you fucking moron, you think there’s loads of testosterone in there, faggot?

>>12393892
Cope harder, incel

>>12358795
>>12359020
As usual, ketolards are dogmatic FATTY FAT FAT RETARDS

>>12079203
>science is outdated
Only to Trump voters

>>12077169
And that’s why the liver creates it. Do you also believe in inhaling gasoline for the carbon?

>muh moderation
Ah, the neurologically impaired centrist speak. I moderate my cholesterol intake to 0

>>12047716
>thank you for being a pretentious retard that confirms my idiotic biases
NPCs in an eggshell

>>11993877
>a single image doesn’t address that topic
Neither does a single fat retard like you saying it doesn’t. This is the basis of the universal consensus that dietary cholesterol raises serum cholesterol, almost entirely LDL, which is bad for your health

>how so
It’s really simple, unfortunately that’s probably too complex for you. You set up argument i no make! You make it seem i say this even tho i no do it!

>of course not
Then again you made another irrelevant point. Nobody cares what bothers you, faggot. You can’t give an absolutely abhorrent interpretation of statistics then just claim it only matters as much as it does to you, it’s roughly an absolute risk increase of about 10% which is significant to anyone that actually has a functioning cerebal cortex

>simplies everything
Thats rich coming from the braindead faggot who just says “nuh uh meat dindu nuffin!!!” with nothing to support his position

>>11895024
>minimalistic controls
Youre grasping for straws. Making shit up because you have no argument. Dietary cholesterol is of no benefit. Make an actual fucking argument, shithead. Facebook boomer infographs are not an argument

Just a reminder guys, super high cholesterol that can oxidize and rupture your arteries only hurts you’re eating too many strawberries

>>11748077
The bad science of meta analysis of metabolic ward studies calculating the control at baseline :(

>>11698834
None of your vague off hand citations are consistent with actual evidence. These studies you speak follow some flaws like not measuring baseline cholesterol, measuring fasting cholesterol, or just manipulate extremely high baseline scores to make it seem 3-5 eggs has no effect

OH NONONONONONO