/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>10978694
>>10978694
>>10978694
>Women's products are blatantly trying to be feminine in loud and obvious ways
So do men's products.

>>10978694
>It's really women's products vs. normal products
No, its not. Generic products are usually the cheapest, then men's products, then women's products.

>>10978707
>>10978707
>I wear some minimalist clothes (underwear, shirt, pants socks, and shoes) because that's the minimum of what I need to be able to show up at work
Please understand the the minimum of what is acceptable for woman is different than a man. There are certain expectations that women need to meet with their appearance to be taken seriously that do not apply to men.

>>10978707
>Women wear way more than the minimum required most of the time
So do men, but this is not the issue we are discussing. The problem is not what men and women decide to do with themselves, but rather than men's products are cheaper than women's for the same product.

>>10978752
>You're acting like it's two different opposing special things when it's really just normal things vs. feminine things.
I am specifically discussing products marketed towards men vs marketed towards women.

>>10978752
>You're being intentionally obtuse if you don't recognize a man dressing up like a woman
In this specific situation, I am discussing a man using a women's razor rather than a men's razor. I understand that not all scenarios in gender based issues can be reversed, but in this specific one it can.

>>10978752
>Men and women aren't opposites like up and down or black and white.
I understand this- but that doesn't justify a higher price for female-marketed goods when compared to male marketed goods.
>>10978760
>they are marketed that because its what they want
Please read what you wrote here several times before attempting to post again. People do not inherently gravitate to pink or blue. Actually, in the early 1900's, pink was considered a men's color and blue was feminine.