/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>17873104
>make sure to count fictional calories that'll make it alright alright
It'll make sure the person eating this food doesn't gain weight, yeah.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19246357
>Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates.
>CONCLUSIONS: Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/08/twinkie.diet.professor/index.html
>Twinkies. Nutty bars. Powdered donuts.
>For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too.
>His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most -- not the nutritional value of the food.
>The premise held up: On his "convenience store diet," he shed 27 pounds in two months.
>For a class project, Haub limited himself to less than 1,800 calories a day.
>His body mass index went from 28.8, considered overweight, to 24.9, which is normal.

>>12523958
>>drink 2000 calories of HFCS
>>eat 2000 calories of potatoes
>>gain different amounts of weight
False, prove it.
>>shit different amounts of shit
>>feel different amounts of full
>>have different amounts of macro/micro nutrients
>WOW THERMODYNAMICS
None of those things disprove CICO. CICO only matters for weight loss.

On a sidenote does anyone have the study where it claimed like 300 days of the year you don't eat at your annual daily rate

>>12276470
not an argument
obesity is caused by an excess of calories not lack of salads

>>12207685
>>12207692
>>12207696
tl;dr, yes you can lose weight eating absolute junk as long as you're at a caloric deficit via portion control, just make sure to supplement important nutrition like vitamins and proteins on the side