/ck/ - Food & Cooking

>>15243010
>What?
Can you read? Do you think the environmental and death impact of "just one cow" is restricted to the cow and your nonexistent time period it takes to secure this?

>>13451088
You could stop pretending to be a neutral bystander and actually source your original claim

>>13451092
Complete lie, cool story though

>>13436253
You can be vegan as a human being just fine. What nourishment is not met by veganism?
>You might be able to survive on it with the use of supplements, but you won't be healthy
Cool story
>Also, the vegan diet is bad for the environment as most of the plants have to be shipped form around the world.
This is different from the food supply in general how? The pollution, land use, efficiency, and carbon emissions on a vegan diet are the most sustainable of any diet in the world
>And many animals, like snakes, rodent, and bunny rabbits are KILLED in the process of growing vegetables.
Significantly less than any other

So what's your excuse again?

>>13380716
Hundreds of animals with lab materials, sounds legit

Why are Trump voters so fucking stupid?

>>13381079
You're fat and you smell weird

>>13380383
>Killing *MORE* small animals so you kill one or two fewer large animals per year is retarded if causing less harm to animals is your goal.

>>13351553
>blog post
Man, antivegans are dumb as shit

>>13326857
>look I have an image
>BTFO!
Whoops

>>13326454
Cool cope

>>13318681
Okay boomer

>>13308956
>if
It does, and its plenty
>there are grass-finished cows
Almost all finished on grain to fatten them up
>even the grain finished eat plant byproducts that are inedible by humans
Ok and?
>plant farming displaces many more animals and cause way more pollution. cows can co-exist with many species
Plants have a fraction of the waste and emissions. Coexisting doesnt mean much in this case when natural habitats are being displaced for invasive cattle that overgraze and uproot. You need to protect them and the grasslands from pests if you want any efficiency

Free range grass provides no protections and is ridiculously ineffectient

>>13291979
The what what?

>>13259497
Yawn

>>13204622
Carnists cant even try to pretend to argue in good faith so they try to enforce their schizophrenic headcanon as reality

>>13139444
No you haven’t

>>13011098

>>12968280
That nonexistent whopping amount you need to pretend exists to justify mass slaughter

>>12907797
And no, we dont kill as much. Even then omnivorous which is a blend of the two would just add more deaths, dumbass

>>12746624
What animal genocide are you even referring to? Oh right this is a strawman retard thread designed for losers with no identity to circle jerk about the fattest pieces of meat they can fit into their mouths

>>12718585
>v-vegans d-do it too!!

>>12472659
Wrong again. Do you think pastures dont get tilled? Treated with pesticides? That cows are native species to the States? That “grass fed” cows dont finish on feedlots? That the government doesnt hunt and displace actual native wildlife in millions to protect artificial livestock? That livestock pollution doesn’t destroy the environment? You’re referencing a paper that didn’t even track animal deaths and cant even do proper math and even admits thats that 12 animals are killed for every hectare of pasture

https://fewd.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/inst_ethik_wiss_dialog/Matheny__G._2003_Defense_of_Veg__in_J._Agric_Ethics.pdf

>>12473455
Harvesters kill animals for crops raises for animals, you are literally making shit up, the difference is the crops raised for humans GO to humans. The US government displaces and kills millions of wildlife from their natural habitat to protect invasive livestock. Dont even try with the environment lmao the emissions are so skewed

>>12359098
You’re taking the redpill son, it’s based and superior in every way

>>12359305
Based and Redpilled

This post made me vegan