[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   
File: 858 KB, 664x1000, tumblr_nkbbz6yyuo1qheuczo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8156838 No.8156838 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /cgl/, I'm looking for great underskirt inspiration. Underskirt thread?

I'm just not quite sure how to make this look work with different dresses and would love some references. Additionally, what do you think of this trend of wearing several underskirts for a longer look (pic related)?

>> No.8156912
File: 79 KB, 695x662, FB_IMG_1425343551079.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8156912

This was posted on CoF. Good example of an underskirt blending in with a dress

>> No.8156917
File: 94 KB, 960x960, FB_IMG_1425343661872.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8156917

Also this

>> No.8156921

I'm 4'10" - do you think I could pull off wearing an underskirt with a dress or nah? I'm worried it'd make my legs look stumpy.

>> No.8156923

>>8156921
If it were a shorter dress and a proportionally shorter underskirt, then yes. Otherwise, I think your best bet is to leave the underskirts to the vertically gifted.

>> No.8156925

>>8156921
Maybe a tea length underskirt? I'd imagine most brand probably already goes past your knees, so it might be an odd length to add a shorter underskirt

>> No.8156927

>>8156923
>vertically gifted
Taking that back with me to the tall lolita group

>> No.8156929

>>8156912
wtf she's humougous

>> No.8156934

>>8156929
Figure that out all by yourself anon? The thread is about underskirts

>> No.8156949

>>8156921
I would say it depends on the style of the dress. For instance, OP's image has a relatively high waist without being empire-waisted so I think it works. I also think the end length is important. If it goes to your ankles, I think it can work. (I don't have the image I'm thinking of but it was pretty much the only image that people used when referring to tea length dresses before underskirts were popularised.)

I would say >>8156917 would probably not work. The underskirt needs to either end just under the hem of the dress or go right down to the ankles to completely hide the legs. At the shins looks stumpy.

>> No.8156957

>>8156917
I wish this underskirt were even all the way around. :/ If the front were the same length as the back it'd be okay I think.

>> No.8156974

>>8156838
I think that would have looked really cute with just the one underskirt, but the other two look droopy and sad and stupid.

>>8156917
You need a petti long enough to hold up the bottom of all of your skirts or you just look like an idiot.

>> No.8156984

>>8156974
for some reason I originally read this is droopy salad kek

>> No.8156993

>>8156838
Anyone know where girl on the right got her headpiece? Or if she made it herself?

>> No.8157029

>>8156912
This blends really well! Especially in second pic

>> No.8157043

http://www.glitzywonderland.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=189&product_id=2468 any idea how to coordinate this? If I let more than one ruffle show, I think the gap looks kinda awkward. Though it ended up being great for mori

>> No.8157045

http://www.glitzywonderland.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=189&product_id=2468 any idea how to coordinate this? If I let more than one ruffle show, I think the gap looks kinda awkward. Though it ended up being great for mori.

>> No.8157088

>>8157043
Anon from this picture ->>>8156912. It really depends. The underskirt I have on in this picture looks similar to that one. I just am wearing it higher so only the last two ruffles show. Depending on the dress you may want to let more or less of the ruffles show and you ca control that by where you wear the underskirt (i.e. high waist, natural waist, low waist, etc...)

>> No.8157158

>>8157088
Makes sense, thanks!

>> No.8157202
File: 1.91 MB, 1280x1571, 1415275279214.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8157202

Vertically gifted here. I have a few photos.

This one is the little dipper underskirt.

>> No.8157205

>>8157202
Love!

>> No.8157206
File: 68 KB, 483x750, 1415485758286.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8157206

>>8157202

>> No.8157210
File: 241 KB, 960x1280, tumblr_n00frxYev11r8awsbo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8157210

>>8157206

>> No.8157217
File: 68 KB, 500x647, tumblr_mwmvo2fiCD1rqc8qto1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8157217

>>8157210
I've purchased the chess story underskirt from taobao last summer. 9/10 would recommend to very tall Lolita. It's not 10/10 because it's almost too ridiculously long.

>> No.8157230

Any recommendations on where to buy good underskirts? I'd just like some to cover my knees (most brand hits a few inches above but usually not quite as high as mid-thigh), not all the way down to my ankles. Thanks in advance!

>> No.8157714

>>8157202
I hate this dress.
I love this coord.

Good job anon, this is the first time I've ever liked a coord with this dress

>> No.8157810

>>8156993
I'm never going to find something like this.

>> No.8157812

>>8157810
nope, you're fucked.

>> No.8157816

>>8157810
Pretty sure she makes all her headpieces herself. You might be able to get a similar look with individual flower clips. For those kind of colors, try vintage millinery flowers (etsy)

>> No.8157825

>>8156838
Scottish tapestry print?! what is this called?

>> No.8157830

>>8157206
What a lovely ega look.

>> No.8157871

I have a question about a dress I own. It's a red sailor OP but sadly it's a little too short. It has the traditional lines going across the bottom and Im wondering it would look awkward to wear an underskirt it
(asking because i don't own an underskirt)

>> No.8158904
File: 366 KB, 450x620, jetj.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8158904

I hope this is the right thread to ask: what do you guys think of this skirt? Can I use it as an underskirt? Does anyone know it's name (so I can search for people wearing it or its measurements?). All I can tell from the auction page is that it's JetJ.

>> No.8158909

>>8157871
got a picture?