/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

[Anonymous No.7225854]

Gothic Lolita wigs has opened their contest up to voting, and some of the people on top are really disappointing. In fact, the current rank 2 girl is clearly wearing an ita ebay wa-lolita monstrocity.

What are your opinions? Do you think it would be funny if an ita won? Would you prefer that only beautiful people won? Would you rather vote for dramatic girls you know will be extremely entertaining?

[Anonymous No.7225856]

>>7225854
>im voting for pengu and the wa-lolita so hard actually. Highly suggested, it'll be hillarious if the "muse for a weekend" girls are actually hideous weebs.

[Anonymous No.7225882]

People don't actually still spend money on their wigs right? I made the mistake of not heeding the warnings, never again. Prices aren't worth what you receive, and if you leave a low ranked critique, they simply won't post it.

[Anonymous No.7225884]

I wonder what drama will come from this!

[Anonymous No.7225887]

>>7225882
When did you buy from them? I saw they're using a new fiber for their wigs now. I'm curious if they'll be decent. I remember seeing the reviews a years ago but a few girls in my community wear their wigs and they looked ok in person.

[Anonymous No.7225898]

>>7225887

Bought the neo classic style about a month ago, It was mildly frizzy, and the bangs and end pieces near the ears were trimmed poorly, It's not unwearable, but the amount of tlc it will need before wear, and considering I paid $50 for the thing, not worth it. You can get cheaper wigs that look ten times as nice out of the bag and require little work elsewhere.

[Anonymous No.7225967]

>>7225854
I'm dying at how many itas are in top ranks... including this guy who looks awful

[Anonymous No.7225968]

>reads thread
>can't be that bad
>holyshitwtf
then again a hot mess ita seems fitting to portray their low-quality wigs

[Anonymous No.7225973]

>>7225856
>mon visage quand my friend told be to vote for the Wa-Lolita because she was "COSPLAY BESTIES!!" with her and wanted her to win
>oh jesus look at dat pattern
I ALMOST couldn't bring myself to do anything because once I saw that dress I was like, it's like this website was made for this girl.

[Anonymous No.7225974]

>>7225968
>>7225967
Exactly

I just want them to be the face of kawaii sugoi arigato nippon otome super special Gothic Lolita Wigs purchases~
Voting~

[Anonymous No.7225977]

>friend knows I'm into lolita
>send me a link through skype
>see it's something about GLW
>"Yeah, I've bought from them before.."
>"No, it's a contest they're having and I'd thought you'd be interested"
>go look at entries
>mfw

>"Anon, you know things like these are just popularity contests anyway, thanks for letting me know~"

[Anonymous No.7225979]

>>7225968
To her credit, she makes that outfit look not fucking disgusting for once.

[Anonymous No.7225987]

This girl is so unfortunate looking.

[Anonymous No.7225994]

>>7225987
I think she's cute. She looks like a teenage version of a Cabbage Patch Kids doll.

[Anonymous No.7225996]

>>7225968
So did she cut a rhapsody in half and make it into pigtails or something

[Anonymous No.7226001]

>>7225996
Pretty sure that's her hair, wearing a GLW was not mandatory

[Anonymous No.7226004]

>>7225994
Maybe if Cabbage Patch dolls had one side of their face blown off by a mine and a team of fantastic surgeons managed to put them back together again, but they always still look a little wonky on one side

[Anonymous No.7226013]

>>7226004
Damn, girl. Did she smear shit on your brand?

[Anonymous No.7226023]

>>7225987
Do people like you seriously get off on acting like such pieces of shit? What is your problem...

[Anonymous No.7226032]

>>7226023
Welcome to /cgl/, enjoy your stay.

[Anonymous No.7226043]

>>7225967
>>7225968
the reason why these people are the top ranks is bc they probably spam their friends list this shit

I know one girl who would literally message everyone on her friend's list and beg them to vote for her.

[Anonymous No.7226045]

>>7226023

[Anonymous No.7226101]

Guess who's single and out of prison?

[Anonymous No.7226109]

>>7226023
lol
>>7226013
Nah, I don't have anything personal against her, I don't even know her, she just posted in the tumblr tag and I thought she looked like a Van Gogh

[Anonymous No.7226113]

>>7226101
Is a man? Would date, go ahead and judge me.

[Anonymous No.7226125]

Ugh, one of my facebook friends is spamming her submission so much, she has posted it 6 times already. If you entered please don't be this person.

[Anonymous No.7226137]

I like blackroseponpon's entry, saw it on tumblr earlier. Haven't seen the others yet but the ones in this thread are... questionable to say the least.

[Anonymous No.7226150]

>>7226001
>wearing a GLW was not mandatory
>wearing
>a GLW
>not mandatory
>no wig is mandatory for the wig shop's contest

whaaaaaaat?

[Anonymous No.7226152]

>>7226150
to be fair, it's not a wig contest it's a muse contest. If they win GLW will be giving them the wigs.

[Anonymous No.7226169]

>>7226152
I'd enter if they'd actually follow up on that. My friend's won twice in the past and got nothing, no discount coupon or anything

[Anonymous No.7226176]

The winner also gets to be part of AM's fashion show, meaning that they'll walk along Misako and the other brand models. Do you really want to send itas to represent the Western community?

[Anonymous No.7226181]

>>7226176
They never follow through on that. And they almost always use someone who's wearing a wig anyways.

[Anonymous No.7226207]

>>7226176
I'd be really embarrassed if the muse claims to be lolita and looks like shit. I don't trust GLW to be able to put together something decent themselves. I don't want to be associated with that.

>>7226181
Don't you think people would notice if GLW isn't in the fashion show since it's such a big event?

[Anonymous No.7226227]

>>7226043
i hate that so much

Though why is >>7225968 present? She's not even wearing a wig

[Anonymous No.7226231]

>>7226227
Because she is in 2nd place on the facebook page where people can vote?

[Anonymous No.7226337]

>>7226109

>looked like a Van Gogh
>like a Van Gogh
> Van Gogh

I think you mean Monet. Spend more time reading books and less time bitching about people on cgl.

[Anonymous No.7226366]

Some of the top entries are so bad that it is making me regret entering at all. ): Someone suggested that the contest application might be broken or rigged because of the winning submissions.

I'm definitely going to post my own entry up here, but please vote for the girls that you think are pretty and well dressed.

[Anonymous No.7226375]

>>7226366

definitely NOT going to post my own entry* holy shit oops

[Anonymous No.7226374]

>>7226337
I think she did mean Van Gogh. She finds the girl pretty ugly from some reason, and being like a Monet would be a compliment. Van Gogh's portraits are weird.

[Anonymous No.7226378]

>>7226113
Looks like a woman to me. That wig looks horrendous on her though.

[Anonymous No.7226384]

>>7226109
>>7226337
>>7226374

Yeah, Van Gogh is probably closer than Monet in terms of lopsided faces. Monet anon might want to study harder for that end of semester art history exam.

[Anonymous No.7226411]

>>7225987
She isn't even the worst face wise

[Anonymous No.7226414]

>>7226411
She looks really uncomfortable, like she's really not used to being in front of a camera.

[Anonymous No.7226417]

>>7226414
She just looks wasted, really.

[Anonymous No.7226431]

I actually want someone shitty looking to win. It would be hilarious that someone with no skills at makeup, hair, etc.. becomes the face of GLW for a day.

[Anonymous No.7226436]

>>7225854
I really want my friend to win. She's cute, talented, and not an ita. Just in case GLW does follow through with sending someone to Matsuri, I'd want some one who actually looks like a model and isn't an embarrassing weebs.
I hate how these things are just popularity contests though. She's not one to spam her friend list, and I think most non lolis on fb don'y want to be seen liking GLW's page. Even if it's just to vote

[Anonymous No.7226437]

>>7225898
I got a Daily Doll wig about 9 months ago and it's great. It's really soft and realistic. My only complaint was they said it would be 20" but it was more like 14".

You must've gotten one of the defective wigs.

[Anonymous No.7226444]

>>7226384
>>7226374

[Anonymous No.7226455]

>>7226444
I am amused that it took so long for someone to post this gif, and that that OP thinks that Clueless is a book.

[Anonymous No.7226461]

Any of their wigs good for just a natural looking hair look? I was thinking of getting one of their Classic (Wavy) wigs in either Milk Tea or one of their Auburn colors.

[Anonymous No.7226480]

>>7226137
Just wish she didn't have such a terrible attitude.

[Anonymous No.7226496]

I really want my friend to win because she coords beautifully but all of these itas...

[Anonymous No.7226511]

>>7226436
>I hate how these things are just popularity contests though.
Agreed. And submitting every single entry and putting it up for vote only makes it harder for better dressed people to be noticed.
IMO, they should accept preliminary applications and choose from the best dressed out of those. Then put them in a contest all at once for people to vote.
Yeah, people could still pander for popularity points, but at least everyone would have started off fairly.

[Anonymous No.7226526]

I entered the contest, but tbh I'm having a hard time resisting the urge to spam everywhere. I hate that kind of thing so I don't want to be a hypocrite. I think I have a decent coord but I don't have a lot of people on my facebook.

[Anonymous No.7226536]

The top 25 become finalists and after they do the 2nd round's steps GLW will end up picking a winner regardless of votes

I doubt they'd let an unnattractive person win even if they were top vote tbh

[Anonymous No.7226722]

>>7226526
Do it. If people don't like your entry they won't vote for it, no problem

[Anonymous No.7226877]

IDK why all the bashing, the girl in first place looks pretty damn amazeballs.

[Anonymous No.7226928]

>>7225987
She has that same puffy inflammation look of sickness just like peachie which looks so gross

[Anonymous No.7226947]

>>7225987
her face looks like it's shopped into the wig in the second picture...

[Anonymous No.7226985]

Honestly, I entered this but did the mistake of not wearing anything remotely Lolita because, simply put, I'm not one. Didn't even wear a wig - I was thinking a natural photo would show off better but rookie mistake I guess lawwwl. Whatever, no regrets.

I spammed my link like mad. If I hadn't, no one would've known I even entered.

I really hope there isn't going to be crazy drama once the contest is over - be it this first batch of votes or the final voting.

[Anonymous No.7227067]

>>7226877
they were probably talking about a previous first place person

[Anonymous No.7227069]

where do you go to see the contestants?

[Anonymous No.7227075]

>>7227069
here ya go anon: facebook dot com slash GothicLolitaWigs slash app_204169126292521

[Anonymous No.7227078]

>>7227075
THANK YOU

[Anonymous No.7227083]

>>7226411
>looking at thumbnail, she looks okay
>open file
WHY

girl needs some serious restyling, I want to get my hands on her so bad.

[Anonymous No.7227093]

Jesus christ I always thought Gothic Lolita Wigs was good quality and liked it a lot because Alexa Poletti wears their wigs so much,
but a lot of the people on the Facebook page really make them look horrible seriously.

[Anonymous No.7227120]

>>7227093
tbh they aren't that great. I have two of them and when they first arrived they were super nice but then after a short while they became really straw-like and itchy. I look good care of them too so idk why it happened, just shitty wigs.

[Stormy !!lRsXER/QIWa No.7227127]

>>7227093
I was the same way, I never knew they were this bad
>>7227120
That sucks, especially because they're mostly pretty expensive and people buy from them a lot so you'd expect better quality from them.

[Anonymous No.7227130]

>>7227120
Same experience here. I bought one at a con because it felt and looked nice but after just wearing it twice it got super tangly. I got my friend to chop off half of it, but I am a bit disappointed that it didn't last longer.

[Anonymous No.7227131]

>>7226169
Has she spoken up publicly about it?

[Anonymous No.7227142]

>>7227131
GLW will probably just get their army of white knights to attack her if she did.

[Anonymous No.7227303]

>>7227093
I decided to take a plunge recently and buy their countess wig.
I have huge regrets.
It was shorter than the product, it was thinner than half of my old wigs, and the styling in the back was HORRIBLE. It was matted. Like,just BAD.
To top it off I cant even have the bangs separated even slightly or the wig cap I wear will show., no matter how far up or down on my forehead I put it or however thick I try to style the bangs.
I mean that's not to say with a little salvaging and work and hairspray it isn't a wonderful wig, but the quality was not what I dished out for it.

[Anonymous No.7227332]

>>7227303
pics?

[Anonymous No.7227346]

>>7227332
None at the moment... Got it like two days ago just been too sad to even look at it or bother taking pics...

[Anonymous No.7227347]

>>7225968
MFW I have that dress, but I only wear it for shits and giggles and would never seriously enter a competition with it. But this girl actually does think this looks great.

[Anonymous No.7227360]

>>7225987
I am almost certain her face is photo shopped into those photos...

[Anonymous No.7227485]

>>7227131
They'd just delete her comments on the page asking about the prizes :/

[Anonymous No.7227488]

>>7227485
"They'd just delete her comments" meaning they have deleted her comments so she gave up on it and hasn't bought from them since

[Anonymous No.7227562]

GLW is probably listening because their making a big frickin deal of transitioning all their wigs to a new Korean fiber. I haven't tried their new lady Amara collection but it does look really high end in photos.

[Anonymous No.7227616]

I find this contest hilarious. These girls are competing to spend a weekend working in the dealers room at a convention in Houston. AM is an ok con, and it is certainly the con to go to in texas for fashion but it's really nothing that special and its not like the winner will actually get to experience the event to the fullest since they'll have to hang out and hock wigs all weekend at the GLW booth.

Houston is gross too, what a shitty trip to win.

[Anonymous No.7227622]

>>7227562
high end? It looks like typical cheap and shitty Korean fibers to me, nothing high end like Gabalnara's most expensive fibers.

[Anonymous No.7227675]

>>7227562
That still looks pretty frizzy and cheap to be honest. I don't see a huge difference between this and their previous wigs.

[Anonymous No.7227783]

All the good entries are towards the bottom. It's kind of sad.

[Anonymous No.7227809]

>>7227562
>shameless self-promotion

[Anonymous No.7228400]

>>7225987
Does she have a link listed with more photos? Her face does look horribly photoshopped so it would be good to compare to something.

[Anonymous No.7228495]

>>7227616
you also get a bunch of wigs, like 5-6+ ish.

[Anonymous No.7228507]

>>7226101
"Hi there, my name is Sereene Brown, but everyone calls me Natsuki!"
...

[Andariel No.7229290]

I feel like this is a bad idea but I figured, "hey.. why the hell not?" Here is my entry, I hope at least some of you may like it and vote for me. Unlike a lot of the other girls on top, I am not going to guilt people with sob stories or pressure friends to push me to the top, I worked hard on my entry. I did all of it on my own. I was the model, the photographer and the retoucher, so I hope that having some skills will mean something to some of you.

Please consider my entry because I agree, a lot of the people on top don't deserve to be there. And even if you don't vote for me, please consider some of the other girls on the bottom that are far superior to those on the top.

Thank you,

Vote Here: https://toptabapp.com/e/344f?p=tx

[Anonymous No.7229295]

>>7229290
Are you a man?

Serious question.

[Andariel No.7229299]

LOL, yeah right. Ofcourse not. But in all seriousness, there actually are some men in the competition >.>

[Anonymous No.7229300]

>>7229290
It looks pretty ita and cheap. Satin, cheap lace, rough looking material for the flower on your head and striped tights.

[Anonymous No.7229304]

>>7229299
I wasn't joking. You just have strong features or you contoured your face very masculine.

Did you only post here to beg for votes? Using a name, not knowing how to reply, emoticons...

[Anonymous No.7229307]

>>7229304
I don't see it. I would believe her pretty easily if she said she was a dude, but when I look at the picture I see a female face and body.

[Andariel No.7229310]

Yup, networking, looking for votes. Never used 4chan in my life.

[Anonymous No.7229365]

You guys complaining about GLW "tangling easily" must not know how to care for your wigs, I've bought several from GLW and they were all nice, almost lockshop quality, but shinier. Also bought wigs from amazon and honestly, it's way more of a crapshoot. Got one that is super realistic, no shine, for 12 bucks, but they sent copper instead of lavender brown. Others from amazon have been blindingly shiny.
At least with GLW you know what you're gonna get.
Yeah, they're way overpriced for the quality, but so are tights/plastic jewelry from AP, bitches still buy that. At the end of the day, it's all fucking plastic

[Anonymous No.7229368]

>>7229365
Are those the only places you've bought from? GLW, Lockshop and Amazon?

[Anonymous No.7229384]

>>7229368
Yes, but several different Amazon shops including L-email reseller
I have not bought cyperous yet but they're on my list next, after I get some more lockshop wigs that is

[Anonymous No.7229430]

Even though she never fucking updates, I like MintyMix's wigs a lot better than GLW's. I wish she'd put more blends and solid colors out though.

I have 2 mintyMix wigs and 3 GLW's (2 were gifts I wish I hadn't gotten.)
The worst of the GLW were the long wavy with pigtails because the fibers were melted throughout the wig so some strands were super thick for no reason? The other was the Empress in lavender and the longer pieces tangled to shit right out the bag.
The short curly one hasn't been worn so IDK.

[Anonymous No.7229446]

>>7229365
I have to brush out & re-curl my GLW wigs much too often, so if you have any opinion on keeping the original curls in tact, tell me your secrets.

[Anonymous No.7229490]

It would be an extremely terrible idea to self promote in this thread, right?

so tempting!

[Anonymous No.7229539]

>>7229490
I did and people just insulted me so, I wouldn't recommend it.

[Anonymous No.7229543]

>>7229539
Yeah I saw your thread. Honestly it looked like someone posing as you posted it out of a vendetta.

[Anonymous No.7229546]

>>7229290
Is that Milanoo? Also, you shoopped your eyes to much.

[Anonymous No.7229550]

Everyone needs to stop complaining about the wigs being easily 'tangled.' They're fucking wigs, they're bound to get tangled because they're not real hair. They're basically a bunch of very small, delicate strings whisking around in the wind and conditions.

My Cyperous wig and two hairpieces tangle at about the same rate as both of my GLW wigs, and I dropped about $150 on the Cyperous ones.
Is the Cyperous wig anything like GLW insofar as style and color? Hell no, that's why I spent that much for it. But as far as it being tangled? Yeah nah, about the same as any other wig.

>>7227303
I own their Countess too, I expected the 'matted' look of the teased fibers (there's just no other way they'd accomplish a bump like that; the 'matting' isn't too noticeable in pictures) but I was disappointed with the length. They muses made it look like the hair was so much longer.

Also with the bangs, I encountered the same issue. You just have to find a swipe that works for you. I'd advise heavily against doing a straight cut.

[Anonymous No.7229555]

>>7229290
Yea but you're still begging for votes.

[Anonymous No.7229559]

>>7229550
I personally found that my GLWs tangled a lot faster than my other wigs. They also seemed to knot and kink more, meaning that they just looked like a huge mess after one wear. Although mine are slightly older, like 2011. My wigs aren't heat resistant either, even though they were advertised as such.

[Anonymous No.7229566]

>>7229559
>My wigs aren't heat resistant either
They are, but at an extremely low heat to the point of it being irrelevant. Meaning I don't bother with their wigs that look like they'd need restyling and maintenance after a few wears, such as the ones with tight curls.

The best advice I can give is don't buy overcomplicated styles. I've personally only ever bought their twintails (contrary to what people say, they do have versatile styles) and some specialty wigs such as the countess. I'd never buy their ringlets or curled bobs. Even some of the looser curls seem like a bitch and a half to redo.

[Anonymous No.7229569]

>>7229566
So.. it's not heat resistant then.

[Anonymous No.7229572]

>>7229566
My wigs are the twintailed ones. After my bad experience with them and the poor quality of the wigs, I don't want to buy from them ever again.
>They are, but at an extremely low heat to the point of it being irrelevant
isn't "extremely low heat" just "warm"? You can't style a wig with just a warm temperature.

[Anonymous No.7229578]

>>7229569
>to the point of it being irrelevant
>>7229572
Indeed. I heard using hot water and curlers works too. I'm just a person who likes to avoid the hassle though.

[Anonymous No.7229583]

>>7229578
I tried using curlers and it melted the bottom (they were set to 80°C) so I had to cut it off. I couldn't get it to set the hair with the hot water method because obviously if it melts at 80°C, the water had to be cooler than that. There's a lot of fibres, they are very full and heavy, so it makes it difficult to style. I was trying to put the curls back into the wig, since it turned into a big frizzy mess when I wore it out only once. In the end I just trimmed off the damage as best I could and gave it away to someone else who really wanted it for some reason.

[Anonymous No.7229585]

>>7229583
what about using curlers then a hair dryer on low?

[Anonymous No.7229589]

>>7229583
Ergh.
I'm going to get out my twintail and test mine, you've got me curious. I believe mine's a 2010/11 blended wig.

The curls fell out of my wig a longggg time ago since I brushed them out, but its kept a nice wave and every now and then I like to make leia inspired buns with it.

[Anonymous No.7229591]

>>7229585
I already gave the wigs away. They really were not good quality and more trouble than they were worth. If a wig is advertised as heat resistant, then I expect to be able to style it with my low heat curlers. I also don't expect a company to throw a bitchfit when you email them asking about the temperatures and explaining that the fibres got damaged from low heat. Just not worth the time or effort. For the same price, I'd rather just buy from a more trusted source.

[Anonymous No.7229592]

>>7229591
I agree with you.

[Anonymous No.7229593]

>>7229589
Ooh post your results here please? I'm really curious in case I was unlucky or something. I'm pretty sure I got mine in like May or June of 2011, after they had a huge long wait time due to production problems (if anyone remembers that, back when they took pre-orders on some styles)

[Anonymous No.7229596]

>>7226417
That would explain why she's wearing that outfit and the horrendous make up job.

[Anonymous No.7229598]

>>7229290
Lol this is ita as fuck

[Anonymous No.7229599]

>>7229290
Your outfit is terrible and begging for votes is stupid.

[Anonymous No.7229606]

>>7229599
It's not stupid to beg, how the heck do you think anyone's going to win if they don't promote.

[Anonymous No.7229607]

>>7229593
Check back in another hour or so.
Watching a South Park marathon right now and being lazy in general.

[Anonymous No.7229611]

>>7229606
There's a difference between begging and promoting. You're ita as fuck and posting shit everywhere that's maybe marginally relevant is begging.

[Anonymous No.7229622]

>>7229607
Thanks anon! Looking forward to it. Enjoy your marathon.

[Anonymous No.7229646]

>>7229606
By deserving it and being physically attractive to the eye.

[Anonymous No.7229647]

>>7229611
So if her outfit was up to your standards would it still be begging? I view begging as being overly obnoxious.

[Anonymous No.7229650]

>>7229647
Making a new thread and posting in this thread asking for votes, then complaining that people "just insulted" them seems a bit obnoxious.

[Anonymous No.7229654]

>>7229647
>So if her outfit was up to your standards
>your standards

I'm pretty sure it's not up to anyone's standards. Just stop being butthurt about it, no one likes this shit outfit.

[Anonymous No.7229679]

>>7229654
I'm not her. No butthurt, just curious.

[Anonymous No.7229714]

>>7229622
Apologies anon, my curling iron broke and it wouldn't turn on, so I had to use my flat iron. I figured it's the same principle though to test the heat.

So here's my freaky wig head. I tested the countess wig since it's the newest one I have. This is what it looks like after I take it out of the bag and put a bow on it.
(con't)

[Anonymous No.7229718]

>>7229714
This is what happened to the wig fibers on the highest heat setting (lol don't do this)
(con't)

[Anonymous No.7229722]

>>7229718
And this is the result after I set my iron to the lowest heat option. Compared to the before pic you can see that this piece is significantly straighter and it didn't melt.
I'm not sure what would happen if you used a curling iron, but obviously the wig should be good if you want to use a flat iron.

[Anonymous No.7229726]

>>7229718
>>7229722
Out of interest, do you know what the temperetures are of those settings?

[Anonymous No.7229732]

>>7229726
Unfortunately I have no idea. It's a conair straightener and it has settings numbered 1-30. 30 is what did the melting damage, and 1 got me the result in the last pic. If I knew the exact temps I'd tell ya, although I'd venture to assume that almost all low settings would be fine. Always do a test strand first (just in case you get what happened in the second pic lol)

[Anonymous No.7229735]

>>7229290
vendetta?

[Anonymous No.7229740]

>>7229735
No sadly, it`s actually her.

[Anonymous No.7229749]

>>7229732
I think the highest setting is about 400°F but I'm not sure what the lowest setting is. To be honest, heat resistant wigs are generally heat resistant up to like 350°F.

[Anonymous No.7229759]

>>7229749
low settings are usually as low as 165°F Most lower end heat resistant wigs do up to 200°F mid to high end ones can go up to 250°F or more.

[Anonymous No.7229770]

>>7229759
GLW state that their "high temperature fiber" can be heated up to 180°F which seems pretty low for a high temperature fiber. I know they're a much higher end wig company, but Cyperous wigs can go up to 160°C, which is like 320°F.

[Anonymous No.7229774]

>>7229770
Honestly, Bodyline has higher temps for their wigs. I've used 200°F on my bodyline and nothing happened.

I'm pretty sure GLW is as bad as Milanoo at this point, the way they operate as a company, they way they don't take criticism, they're an ita magnet who has a horde of dumb itas defending them to the gills, and they have shit quality and basically are starting to steal money.

[Anonymous No.7229775]

>>7229714
>>7229718
>>7229722
Thanks for experimenting, anon! Looks like it held up pretty well on the low setting. Maybe mine were just from one of the bad batches. I know they had a lot of hit or miss quality back around the time I got mine, due to bouncing around various warehouses. Although that being said, it was held on a little longer than a straightener is held on for, so maybe that makes a difference. I really don't know!

>>7229759
The lowest setting on my heat tools that melted my wig was only 80°C/176°F. I would guess that's due to being on the lower end of a heat resistant fibre? I really don't consider that temperature to be heat resistant though.

[Anonymous No.7229789]

>>7229775
Not trying to belittle your experience with them, but are you sure your curler's temperature is accurate? That temp is pretty much at the top of their recommended styling heat. If your curler is hotter than it says it is then it could have been an issue with that rather than your wig.

[Anonymous No.7229792]

>>7229775
No problem, I'd been meaning to test out the heat resistance on my wigs. Although I'm a bit pissed that brand new curler already shit the bed. Didn't even get to use it more than once.

[Anonymous No.7229799]

>>7229789
Good point, but I am very sure it was not over that temperature. Since at the time I wore many wigs, I used the curlers mainly for those so I checked the temperature regularly to avoid problems like you described.

>>7229792
I'm sorry to hear that! Is it still under warranty?

[Anonymous No.7229800]

>>7229774
So are bodylines wigs not too bad them? I want to get a heat resistant wig for Rise from persona 4.

[Anonymous No.7229803]

>>7229799
Lol I doubt it, don't even have the box anymore. Thanks though, sigh.

[Anonymous No.7229804]

>>7229789
No it's because GLW sucks. It's already been stated that the temp they state on the site is really really low for 'heat resistant' anything.

[Anonymous No.7229880]

>>7225987
she looks like that in person, anon.

[Anonymous No.7229916]

>>7229800
Not the anon you asked but for the price, bodyline wigs are pretty good. Would recommend.

[Anonymous No.7229920]

>>7229916
Thank you very much. I want fullness mainly

[Anonymous No.7229934]

Any theories on which entrant might win? Who wants to take bets?!

[Anonymous No.7230031]

>>7226526
This is me.

My entry is here if you'd like to help me out.

https://toptabapp.com/e/348j?p=tx

If you have any criticisms, I'm open to suggestions. Thanks.

[Anonymous No.7230034]

>>7230031
damn girl you kawaii

[Anonymous No.7230036]

>>7230034
Ahhh... Thank you, that means a lot.

[Anonymous No.7230040]

>>7230031
You look nice, though the photography isn't very good and your makeup seems a little underdone.

[Anonymous No.7230610]

>>7230040
Is there anything specific about the photography? I didn't have much lighting so I lost some quality. But is the editing off too?

[Anonymous No.7230618]

>>7230610
It seems a tiny bit over exposed, you can see because the whites are a bit too jarring, try fixing the contrast.

[Anonymous No.7230623]

>>7230618
thanks, I had to up the exposure when editing which probably didn't help either. I'll keep an eye on the contrast next time.

[Anonymous No.7230638]

>>7229446
I just use a wide toothed comb, very slowly and gently, comb from the bottom up, never comb near your wefts. You can twist the curls back into shape with your fingers. As long as you've never used heat on the fibers at all, they will go back into place.
I don't own any ringlet wigs though or anything besides loose curls, so it may not work on super curled wigs?

[Anonymous No.7231892]

>>7230031
you're literally one of the very few who isn't ita. I wish you would win. Dx

[Anonymous No.7232189]

>>7226137
I've had a thing against this chick ever since she kept self-posting her horrible cpk and ~dark mori~ shit in our jfash threads and being a cunt about it. She's improved since then but I still can't stand her.

[Anonymous No.7232353]

This one is my favorite. This girl is beautiful.

[Anonymous No.7232613]

>>7232353
PHOTOSHOP OVERLOAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I bet I could look that that with the right PS pro.

[Anonymous No.7232624]

>>7232613
Or she might actually look like that. I don't mean that in any condescending way, but some people are just actually pretty. The world is a big place, some people are bound to be good looking enough to not need to not drastically alter their photos. I could be wrong though, and she could be shooped.

>>7232353
That wig desperately needs some combing, though I really like the way the bangs sit.

[Anonymous No.7232625]

>>7226137
This looks like hoverloli.

[Anonymous No.7232628]

>>7232624
*to not need to
Ignore that last 'not, ' my bad.

[Anonymous No.7233090]

>>7231892
Thanks, last I checked I was in 33rd place so I might have a chance to make the top 25. Also, I don't know if anyone else noticed but the fine print says that GLW may pick up to 5 other contestants themselves.

[Anonymous No.7233186]

>>7232353
I love this girl but the coord is crrraaapp. I have followed her on tumblr for ages and im constantly looking at her shironuri stuff but i had really hoped she would be a better lolita.

[Anonymous No.7233203]

>>7229490
I would only do it if you say something like you'll run around and be totally crazy. etcetc trolling glw. then i'd vote for you somewhere like here

[Anonymous No.7233244]

>>7233090
wait, where does it say that? besides the top 25?

[Anonymous No.7233586]

>>7233244
On the contest page click contest terms. It's under round 1 winner selection.

>>7233203
I can't promise anything, I'm a goody two-shoes.

[Anonymous No.7233806]

>>7233586
oh wow thats true! huh interesting, i wonder who those extra 5 will be

[Anonymous No.7233882]

>>7233806
It says "up to" which I take to mean that they may not even select anyone extra.

[Anonymous No.7234286]

>>7229290
please be joking

[Anonymous No.7234492]

>>7233882
yea, eh we'll see. Im in the contest but i kinda gave up already because it truly does seem like a popularity contest and some of these girls are better dressed than i am

[Anonymous No.7234521]

>I’m Amanda, but I’m often referred to as Panda-Chan. Why? Because “panda” rhymes with “Amanda.”