[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 60 KB, 600x800, 1234749193172.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769279 No.6769279[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>male
>white
>5'8"
>skinny
>6/10


What character could I cosplay that, if done well, would be simultaneously impressive to look at and also make women cream their pants?

>> No.6769285

the one where you show us your dick

>> No.6769286

Lmao I hope you aren't implying the guy in the photo is you, OP.

Because that is a 28 year-old gay cosplayer.

>> No.6769339

Try something that throws cream at women's pants.

>> No.6769347
File: 258 KB, 1155x597, 1362592896376.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769347

>> No.6769349

show us your dick OP

>> No.6769372

>>6769285
>>6769349
Why do you want dick so bad? You're on the internet.
Also, for all you know he could be hideous.

>> No.6769374

>>6769285
Is this some tumblr meme or what? Or are you trying to push this on /cgl/ because /cgl/ is the "girl board"?

Because I hate to break it to you but it's already shit.

>> No.6769448

You're not getting an answer unless you post your dick.

>> No.6769463

>>6769374
Tumblr meme? Seriously? Dick or gtfo?

Newfag pls.

>> No.6769486

>>6769463
>>6769448
Seems to me more like you're some desperate femnazi who thinks this will actually catch on.

Let me tell you why it won't:
a) You're obviously new here. The earliest appearance of this 'le funny maymay' is Wed Mar 6 of this year.
b) This isn't a girl board; only desperate neckbeards from /r9k/ or /fit/ think so. It's 60% male to 40% female.
c) It is impossible to fulfill such request in any way, for there is no way of showing a penis on a safe board with it being tolerated. 'Tits or gtfo' is much simpler, because tits does not necessarily include nipples, and as long as there are no nipples, and there's some skimpy clothing (eg underwear) any kind of tit is considered safe.

So perhaps you should direct your 'female empowerment' first towards the horrible bias in our society where male nudity is treated as a much bigger taboo than female nudity. I'm sure that we're all suffering because of this disgusting patriarchal kyarcharl cisgendered oppression -- and it takes a *real human bean* -- I mean *hero* -- like YOU (!!) to save us.

Now, would you kindly fuck off?

>> No.6769490

>>6769486
>c) It is impossible to fulfill such request in any way, for there is no way of showing a penis on a safe board with it being tolerated. 'Tits or gtfo' is much simpler, because tits does not necessarily include nipples, and as long as there are no nipples, and there's some skimpy clothing (eg underwear) any kind of tit is considered safe.
Would balls be acceptable then? Seems a fair compromise.

>> No.6769499

>>6769490
I doubt it. Most ballsacks are very un-aesthetic, perhaps even more so than penises (I would certainly prefer to look at a majestic dong than at some neckbeard's hairy nuts), so they would be reported even faster.

>> No.6769500
File: 120 KB, 640x496, thisguy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769500

>>6769486
>So perhaps you should direct your 'female empowerment' first towards the horrible bias in our society where male nudity is treated as a much bigger taboo than female nudity. I'm sure that we're all suffering because of this disgusting patriarchal kyarcharl cisgendered oppression -- and it takes a *real human bean* -- I mean *hero* -- like YOU (!!) to save us.

P.S. I haven't posted yet and I also want to see the D.

>> No.6769502

>>6769500
Yeah, sure you do.

>> No.6769506

>>6769486
>>6769499
It's called posting it and then deleting it so we can all see it on the archive ya dingus

>> No.6769508

I don't think this thread is going anywhere until somebody sees some wang, so I'm just going to make a thread on /b/ and link it here.
Then maybe we can get this thread rolling.

Also, OP, if you're still around, we need to see your face.

>> No.6769511
File: 837 KB, 500x231, 1365022937449.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769511

>>6769502
u callin me a faget, m8?

>> No.6769526

>>6769486
Grow some fucking balls and post it already.

>> No.6769565

>>6769506
You're really grasping at straws here. Plus, the old archive doesn't work anymore these days so you can't look at pics no more.

>> No.6769573

>>6769565
So don't use the old archive.

>> No.6769638

Wenk

>> No.6769643

>>6769638
There. Now let's get back on track.
I'd actually like some suggestions myself. I can't think of any anime characters that aren't skiiny waifs.

>> No.6769645

>>6769573
The new one cannot enlarge deleted pics? It says you're leeching.

>> No.6769682 [DELETED] 
File: 1 KB, 125x93, 1366066205179s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769682

>>6769638
wenk

>> No.6769708

>>6769682
I deleted it for a reason you know. Blue board and all.

>> No.6769713

>>6769682
Why is it so tiny? And I don't mean the pic resolution.

>> No.6769716

>>6769286
that is me, bitch tits

>> No.6769722

>>6769713
>virgin who has never seen a dick irl before

>> No.6769723

Ew, what a disgusting, pathetic cock.
Can you even penetrate a woman with some so.... inadequate?

>> No.6769733
File: 324 KB, 1200x1600, 1362069960285.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769733

Casemods plz go

>> No.6769737

>>6769723
>another virgin whose never seen a dick irl before

keep schlicking to your bukake videos, you don't want to disappoint yourself

>> No.6769743
File: 244 KB, 480x640, 1345505305610.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769743

>>6769737

Plz go Casemods

>> No.6769781

>>6769723
>>6769737
>I-I'm average! I really am! You just don't know what REAL DICKS look like, y-you virgins!

You sound like a fat girl talking about how REAL WOMEN have curves. Except fat girls can get slimmer and hot, and you, well, not much you can do.

>> No.6769788

>>6769781
i could find a woman who isn't a picky bitch

you, however, will have endless failed relationships until you're 40, fat, and with a house full of cats

>> No.6769790

>>6769781
It's 8 inches long. I just have bigger hands than you do.

>>6769716
Post full face pic so I can give you suggestions. Unless you want something that covers your face, in which case
>Spider-Man
>Deadpool
>Casshern

>> No.6769809
File: 75 KB, 600x600, 385978_2740465394520_223574656_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6769809

>>6769716

This is the guy in your photo. The mustache he's wearing is made out of felt, unlike yours. Nice try, though.

>> No.6769815

>>6769809

This thread just keeps getting more and more embarrassing.

>> No.6769837

So when is OP going to post his dick?

>> No.6769857

What do you really look like OP? It'd be easier to help you if you if you posted a real pic.

>> No.6769863

>skinny
gross, do you even lift? or do you have a glandular problem?

>> No.6769882

>>6769722
T-that's because no boy would ever date me because of my flat chest.;_;

>> No.6771064

OP here.


Thanks for the zero help.

>> No.6771073

>>6771064
np bby, don't stop being seksy

>> No.6771081

>>6771064
Post your face so we can help you. We won't laugh.

>> No.6771082

>>6771064
Honestly, OP
Just wait a bit and then go find a "Recommend me a cosplay" thread or whatever they are called and post a picture of yourself, with some ideas and recommendations for others, there.
Or at least I think that is the etiquette.
I only cosplay as an homage to characters/series I have greatly enjoyed, not what I think girls will find attractive.

>> No.6771124
File: 478 KB, 650x650, Clipboard03.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771124

>>6771081
okay, fuck it then... here I go

>> No.6771139

>>6771124
hhahahhahaha if you aren't living on the edge you're taking up too much space, right breh

>> No.6771143

>>6771124
I don't know about the parameters you set forth, but you're giving me Andrew Ryan vibes.

>> No.6771154

>>6771124

Yes, a badly lit, grainy photo where you're squinting and at least 35% of your face is covered by your hand.
Brilliant.

>> No.6771160

>>6771139
>>6771154
Yeah...nice, I'm going to tell every other board on 4chan how bad you people are.

>> No.6771167

>>6771160
I'm sure they'll give you much better cosplay advice. >>6771143 is a decent suggestion.

>> No.6771183
File: 207 KB, 400x259, 1348136366061.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771183

>>6771160
How are we supposed to help you if you don't show us what the fuck you look like?

Here's a suggestion. How about you dress up as a character you actually like and HAVE FUN instead of making some laughable attempt to get laid by dressing up as a damn fictional character?

>> No.6771195
File: 245 KB, 798x500, 1363234323220.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771195

>>6771160
>"YOU MEANIES I'LL GO TELL ON YOU"

>> No.6771216

You know, I see a lot of idiots on the internet complaining about women only cosplaying "for the attention" and trying to ensnare men or whatever, but it seems like it's only guys that show up here asking how to dress for the opposite sex. If we apply those same judgments to this guy, then that would make him a pig disgusting attention whore who isn't a REAL nerd.

>> No.6771240
File: 316 KB, 500x500, laughing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771240

>>6771160

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

>> No.6771244

>>6771216
The difference is that the guys how come here don't come with those questions to cosplay for attention; they want to do it in hopes they will get laid and will no longer be the filth of society.

Just think about it. Pretty much every single ugly guy on /cgl/ has started cosplaying to get laid (and it worked for most of them; which is why it's so popular).

>> No.6771245

>>6771160
>I'm going to tell every other board on 4chan how bad you people are
Good luck with that and cry harder.
They already think all we talk about is how to get a sugar daddy and menstruation stuff.

>> No.6771249

>>6771244
That's still for attention, though. People say girls are cosplaying for the attention of guys (whether at the con or online) and these guys are clearly cosplaying for the attention of the opposite sex...

>> No.6771251

>5'8"
manlet

>> No.6771253

>>6771244
How is getting laid NOT a form of getting attention? If there's an appreciable difference, isn't it creepier to do something for the express purpose of having sex rather than simply enjoying compliments? Is a guy's ability to get laid inherently linked to being "the filth of society"? I don't think so. I just think it's really dumb to pick up a hobby in hopes that someone, somewhere, will want to touch your genitals.

>> No.6771262
File: 223 KB, 590x333, 1342821677705.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771262

>>6771160

Poor bby.
You think we're bad, try being a woman on... Well... every other board.

>> No.6771260

>5'8"
>skinny
>6/10
>what cosplay can i wear to make women cream their pants

Tbh nothing. If you want sexual attention then you need to either be a handsome/kawaii asian guy or cosplay shirtless, which there is no point in doing since you're not fit.

>> No.6771261

>>6771253
>How is getting laid NOT a form of getting attention?
It's attention from one individual. It's like you're saying that when someone is trying to talk to another person, he's doing it for attention (because he's getting their attention).

It's about semantix -> when you call someone an attention whore, generally it means they need a lot of atteniton, not just a bit.

>> No.6771270

>>6771244
So basically all men who cosplay are sluts. Literally the most common definition of 'slut', much more so than any women who cosplay.
Alright.

>> No.6771271
File: 100 KB, 1254x261, TITS OR GTFO.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771271

>>6771262
>mentions "I'm a girl / As a girl / That really pleases my fangirl..." etc
>implying that the fact that you revealed your gender means something, makes your post special
>someone tells you tits or gtfo
>"waah, waaah, I am suffering!! oppressed! waah!"

Have you perhaps thought about that some of the other anons who don't drop "Im le girl xD" in their posts are also female, but they don't think that mentioning it is important? I can't think of a board where saying what gender you are could be relevant.

>> No.6771276

>>6771270
No, you're just being desperate, once again. Someone who has sex once per 20 years is hardly the definition of slut.

Feels like this thread is filled with tumbler SJWs.

Ugly men who cosplay are desperate. That is the word. Desperate. Losers too, but that is a given since they're ugly (and not rich).

>> No.6771277
File: 309 KB, 692x720, 1342846354187.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771277

>>6771271

Actually I was referring to the hate threads created, most commonly in /b/, /fit/, /soc/, /a/ etc... They'll be spewing sexist bullshit even if they're assuming no woman can even see it.

>> No.6771278

>>6771271
It shouldn't mean anything, but anons on other boards will react as if you've just announced you're a murderer or something. If someone ever mentions that they have brown hair or something like that, you don't see anything close to the same reaction.

>I can't think of a board where saying what gender you are could be relevant.
Some boards will have threads where people discuss their personal experiences. People have to give context about themselves as backstory (am gril, am student, am driving, etc.).

>> No.6771282

>>6771271
>I can't think of a board where saying what gender you are could be relevant.
Because (aside from on /cgl/) it is always assumed that you're male. Men don't have to mention they're men because that's the default gender on 4chan.

For example: complaining about not having a girlfriend is a perfectly acceptable thing to do on many boards. Complaining about not having a boyfriend first gets you "haha faggot enjoy your AIDS" and then if the poster is a heterosexual female and corrects them it's "fucking attention whore tits or gtfo women can't ever be lonely you slut". Fun, yes?
Not a personal example because I think both sides here are pathetic, but that's 4chan culture for you.

>> No.6771283

>>6771276
"Slut" doesn't have a fixed definition, it's pretty much anyone who has any sex the pope wouldn't approve of. This guy's a slut for having one night stands, even if it's only one.

>> No.6771284

>>6771277
Perhaps you might want to consider that critique is not always hate.

But once again.
>tumblr
>feminism
>bawwww I'm a victim!! look at me!! VICTIM!!! PROTECT ME!!!!

>> No.6771287
File: 178 KB, 351x347, 1353331615093.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771287

>>6771284
>critique

>> No.6771288

>>6771283
>"Slut" doesn't have a fixed definition
Says anon.
>Slut or slattern is a term applied to an individual who is considered to have loose sexual morals or who is sexually promiscuous
Says wikipedia / common sense.

Yes, I'm definitely with anon on this one. The English language should not have any words with objective / precise / understandable meanings. Every word should cater to our feelings.

>> No.6771290
File: 15 KB, 523x497, 1337441030858.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771290

>>6771284

Funny.

because right now it's you who's being a whiny little faggot.

>> No.6771291

>>6771287
Well, I cannot imagine what "hate threads" you have in mind right now. But perhaps if they're having a thread where they all mention how they hate women who are being bitches / calling them mean words, perhaps they mean some women in particular and not you? Unless, of course, you identify with the women they're slandering?

>> No.6771295

>>6771288
>loose sexual morals

This is exactly the part that's subjective though. Pretty much no one agrees on what that means. Some people think that rape/sexual assault is the only bad sexual morality, some people think anything other than mormon sex is.

>> No.6771292

>>6771290
Am I? You're the one who said your feelings are hurt on other boards and that you're suffering.

>> No.6771297
File: 114 KB, 729x1024, 1360795239183.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771297

>>6771284
You know boards commonly have threads that are just labelled "misogyny threads," right?

>>6771160
>implying other boards like us anyway
>implying we don't love our bitch reputation because it keeps morons like you out

>>6771271
Jesus, what the fuck did that have to do with the post you responded to? Do you have tourette's?

Fuck off, crossboarding scum.

>> No.6771298

>>6771282
>Men don't have to mention they're men because that's the default gender on 4chan.
Or maybe no gender is assumed by default, and you only feel like that because you don't have your 'special privileges' that you feel you should have, for mentioning you're a woman.

There are lots of females on 4chan (usually the ones who have been here for longer than six months) who understand this and it does not bother them. The rest tend to come from... special places... on the Internet.

>> No.6771299
File: 74 KB, 184x208, 1311698213939.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771299

>>6771292

I never said I was suffering.

I said the guy I was replying to was suffering, and that that was pathetic.
I don't even know if that pussy was you.

>either way, this thread is full of fedora wearing beta faggots.

And I have no patience for any of you.

>> No.6771300

>>6771297
>You know boards commonly have threads that are just labelled "misogyny threads," right?
Do you know what irony means?

> what the fuck did that have to do with the post you responded to?
>You think we're bad, try being a woman on... Well... every other board.
How else would he suffer if he were a woman on any other board?

>> No.6771303

>>6771299
>either way, this thread is filled with one projecting samefaggot.
Fixed that for you.

Now back to tumbler, hero.

>> No.6771301

>>6771298
No, they definitely assume "male". Go look at any other board right now, it's pretty goddamn obvious to anyone who can read.

>> No.6771302
File: 105 KB, 521x572, 1365669656341.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771302

>>6771298
>Or maybe no gender is assumed by default
Holy fuck, are you actually retarded?

>> No.6771305

>>6771301
>>6771302
No, it's pretty obvious that you are summerfriends.

>bawww 4channys have to cater to my needs!

>> No.6771304

>>6771291
When lonely Nice Guy dipshits complain on 4chan about women being bitches, they're not complaining about specific women in their lives behaving rudely but about all women who don't behave the way they, anon, wants them to. Otherwise why complain about "women" and not about "my sister", "my ex" or "my boss"? These threads are always about women in general (with the occasional vague one-sided anecdote). I do identify with the women they're slandering because the women they're slandering could be anyone they met on the street, anyone in their class, any woman they interacted with who didn't suck their dick. Yes, they could be talking about me.

>> No.6771306
File: 158 KB, 700x807, 1322542260018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771306

>>6771300
>Do you know what irony means?
You think that threads labelled "misogyny threads" that are full of posts bashing women are somehow ironic? Have you ever seen them? They are not.

>How else would he suffer if he were a woman on any other board?
Uh, you know even if you don't say you're a woman, you still ARE one, right? So when someone says "All women are fucking disgusting and I wish we could heard them into camps," they are still talking about you.

>> No.6771308
File: 83 KB, 427x640, 1303456591843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>6771303

may your dick stay dry and your balls stay blue

>> No.6771310

>>6771304
>When lonely Nice Guy dipshits complain on 4chan about women being bitches
Sounds like /r9k/ to me. Mind you, I've never seen a single thread like the one you keep mentioning "ARE EVERYWHERE" on the boards that I frequent (/fit/, /hm/, /fa/, /lgbt/).

>> No.6771313
File: 6 KB, 400x400, 1273156671764.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771313

>>6771298
I have been on 4chan for 4+ years now (no, I'm not proud of myself) and not mentioning my gender was beaten into me within my first few weeks of lurking. I like how you mention privilege. You might want to look that up.

Oh god now I do sound like I'm from tumblr.

>> No.6771317

>>6771304

Your post.

It smells like truth.

>> No.6771315

>>6771308
Projecting to the last breath, I see.

>>6771306
>are somehow ironic?
Yes.

A lot of the stuff posted on 4chan is ironic. You'd know that if you weren't the newest kid on the block.

> So when someone says "All women are fucking disgusting and I wish we could heard them into camps," they are still talking about you.
Once again, never seen such threads.

I think that in the end there will be a Shyalaman twist and we will find out that you're the poster of those threads everywhere, and they are in fact deleted within 6 months.

I mean 5 seconds.

>> No.6771316

>>6771305
Calling other people "new" while saying 4chan is genderless and neither presumed nor actually mostly male?

You are literally too stupid to insult.

>> No.6771318

>>6771313
>Oh god now I do sound like I'm from tumblr.
Now we're getting somewhere. If you want I can ask my boyfriend to help you further, he's a psychology student.

>> No.6771321

>>6771310
>/hm/
>/lgbt/
Okay, strike those off the list because clearly they're not going to be full of straight men complaining about women. Well, you might get straight men on /lgbt/ complaining that lesbians are stealing pussy from them...

/v/ has it particularly bad. moot tries to clean it up every so often, but it never lasts very long. /fit/ occassionally has them, but I think I'e seen more "lol fat women" threads than the plain ol' misogyny threads the other boards have. Can't talk about /fa/ since I never go there.

>> No.6771323

>>6771315
>Once again, never seen such threads.
Jesus. Try browsing for more than 5 minutes, maybe.

I really don't understand what you're even arguing. Plenty of people on 4chan call themselves misogynists proudly. You don't need to defend them from their own beliefs.

>> No.6771324

>>6771316
Yes, I'm calling you new. It obviously bothers you. Probably because it's true. I have never seen people cry about 'tits or gtfo' before the rise of tumblr cretinism. So it's something new for me. So it is highly likely that the people preaching that are new too.

>> No.6771325

>>6771310
Are you fucking serious? Those "women should be put into camps" threads have been posted at least five times on /lgbt/. /fit/ has misogyny threads regularly ("all women will become fat stupid whores who ruin their husband's lives").

>> No.6771330

>>6771324
Nobody is talking about 'tits or gtfo' but you.

>> No.6771332

>>6771323
>Plenty of people on 4chan call themselves misogynists proudly.
Probably because they've been accused so many times of being misogynists by the hate propaganda that they're trying to 'claim' the word. You know, like them 'slut walks' and stuffies.

>> No.6771327

>>6771310
Of course /lgbt/ have few misgony threads, those are some of the few boards that are more accepting to girls. /hm/ is a gay board, why would they talk about girls there? /fit/ likes to come here and raid us sometimes, because we are the "girl board". Also, have you even tried looking at /tv/, /v/, /b/, /pol/ and other boards?

Maybe you are the new one here.

>> No.6771335

>>6771310
I never said they are everywhere. You're talking to multiple people here, bub. One anon upthread mentioned /b/, /fit/, /soc/ and /a/, though. These boards, even if they don't have scheduled "let's talk about how women suck" threads, are filled with casual misogyny. At least if it were confined to one thread we'd be able to hide it but board culture is fucking steeped in that shit.
On boards like /hm/ it's pretty obvious they're not going to have threads dedicated to women but event the slightest hint that a poster may have female genitalia sets off the omg ew cootie alarms like no place I've ever seen before. /hm/ is one of those boards that's best without text.

>> No.6771336

Stop feeding the trolls you idiots.

>> No.6771338

>>6771336
but he's funny

>> No.6771339

>>6771327
>Maybe you are the new one here.
Once again, no, I'm not new, else I could not notice the difference of how the rise of popularity of certain sites causes a dramatic rise of certain types of posters on some boards.

I've been on pretty much every non-picdump board at one point in time.

>> No.6771341

>>6771336
But they're funny. And I don't have a tumblr account myself, so how else do I get to talk to them?

>> No.6771342
File: 32 KB, 500x500, 1273423990601.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771342

>>6771332
Congratulations, you finally got me.

>> No.6771343

>>6771332
Haha, no, it's because they openly hate women and aren't ashamed of it.

>> No.6771350

>>6771332
>hate propaganda
>slut walks

Generally, people get accused of misogyny because they are misogynistic. It's like how the only people who complain about getting accused of racism are the ones who are actually really fucking racist.

>> No.6771352

>>6771350
>Generally, people get accused of misogyny because they are misogynistic.
No, generally people get accused of misogyny when they argue with neo-generation feminists. Doesn't matter what gender they are, or what they said.

>> No.6771358

Feminism is a terrible movement that has gained very little political ground since Roe v. Wade because the movement has evolved little since then.

Rather than pursuing women's rights as a human rights issue and spreading education to 3rd world countries (That's how you get the AIDS and poverty down), militant feminists exclude men from the dialogue and create their own construct of an arch nemesis, the 'patriarchy.' Most men would agree rape is wrong; simply posit the idea of seeing their mother/sister/girlfriend raped right in front of them. Unsung heroes are made on the spot.

As long as feminists vilify the other equal half, there will never be true equality. Instead of pursuing a pragmatic globally minded way of making the world a better place, many internet keyboard jockeys spread shitty ideas on tumblr about endless classifications of people, which actually have little to do with feminism or women's rights in the first place. Two gay men getting married has nothing to do with 'rape culture.'

I'm sure a lot of you will grow out of it when you enter the adult workforce and focus on meaningful shit like the wage gap. Way to drop that ball, feminists.

Keep working on creating new genders and pronouns tho

>> No.6771361
File: 27 KB, 300x400, fatjessi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771361

>>6769279
>male
>5'8"

Short guys should all kill themselves.

>> No.6771362

>>6771358
Didn't read lol. >>>/r9k/

>> No.6771364
File: 19 KB, 329x321, 1365226941340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771364

>>6771358
Thanks for making the same goddamned uneducated post that's posted five times a minute on 4chan! I sincerely hope you took the time to type out every word yourself!

>> No.6771376
File: 23 KB, 500x352, 1354762082451.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771376

Jesus, what the fuck happened to this thread?

>> No.6771385

>>6771376
Angry fat manlet.

>> No.6771384

What...the fuck...

>> No.6771386

>>6771376
I think it was just
>horatio puts on his glasses
socially justified.
>YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAH

>> No.6771388

>>6771385
Unlikely, since OP only posted... well the OP, and everything else ITT was just trolling SJWs.

>> No.6771392

Hey lets check out the board I havent checked since months since people are always bitching.

Woah, time to leave cya.

Just kidding I love how you people all hate eachother. Please do proceed

>> No.6771395

>>6771124
was this guy the OP? I guess so. Then yeah, OP turned out to be an angry fat manlet.

>> No.6771404

>>6771395
It wasn't. As I said, I posted that pic after thoroughly searching for the most embarrassing guy pic I had on my hard drive. And I obviously posted >>6771160 too, just to see if there's actually people dumb enough to fall for that.

They don't call me master ruseman for nothing.

>> No.6771407

>>6771404
So there was never a serious request for help?
Well, don't I feel silly.

>> No.6771425

>>6771407
Maybe OP was serious, but as I said, I'm not him.

>> No.6771661

>>6771395
OP here.

No, that's not me. But this thread has been turned into just a shitposting dump so idc.

>> No.6771674

>>6771661

So delete the thread. You have the power to do that as OP, you know.

>> No.6771683

>>6771674
But then how would he get attention?

>> No.6771684

>>6771674
Okay, I will.

>> No.6771686
File: 42 KB, 300x300, tumblr_m27ak2jThQ1qdc388o1_400.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6771686

This board sucks anyway OP, you should really go elsewhere. Think about it - this is 4chan. Think about the kind of people that come to post here. Now think about the girls that post on this website regularly.

They're not normal. Go somewhere else.

>> No.6771800

>>6771686
That's a very broad generalization. Most of people on 4chan are not only normal, but among the best kind of people there is in our society (=intellectual non sheeple).

You might smirk at it, but you know it's true. Better to know people from 4chan than honeybooboos.

>> No.6771812

>>6769486
>b) This isn't a girl board; only desperate neckbeards from /r9k/ or /fit/ think so. It's 60% male to 40% female.
This is the most wrong thing I've heard in years.

>> No.6771822

>>6771800
You have got to be joking.

4chan is the most UNintellectual forum on the fucking internet. Hating on people and being part of a crab bucket doesn't make you a free thinker.

>> No.6771829

>>6771822

Well you're here, ergo you're dumb and you don't know what you're talking about.

>> No.6771847

>>6771822
>chan is the most UNintellectual forum on the fucking internet.
No it's not, for Christ's sake.

Have you ever been on any other forum (imageboard or not)? They're always filled with Nazi moderators (who are often below the age of 18 and self-righteous as fuck) who ban people for *not liking the TONE of their posts*. This is literally one of the .... four places that I know on the Internet where there's such a thing as a freedom of speech (within the specified rules).

Anywhere else, you have to be:
>always nice to others, never insult anyone, never even be edgy.
>always be 'politically correct'.
>or even pay for using the forum.

And none of the other places are on a grand scale (with tens of thousands of users) as 4chan is.

>> No.6771957

We can't have PT threads but this shit can be here all day? Where the fuck are the janitors when they're actually wanted?