[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 481 KB, 1080x1072, Screenshot_20210616_201702.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10632815 No.10632815 [Reply] [Original]

Last thread >>10630340

>> No.10632833

>>10632815
>new thread, no dump

>> No.10632885

>>10632815
This op looks cheap as shit

>> No.10632891
File: 265 KB, 966x1718, Tumblr_l_600056998550421.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10632891

>> No.10632913
File: 204 KB, 1043x1063, 20210616_155158.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10632913

>> No.10632924
File: 184 KB, 1078x1318, 20210616_161459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10632924

>> No.10632925
File: 570 KB, 1078x1283, 20210616_161844.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10632925

>> No.10632929
File: 21 KB, 904x448, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10632929

This is from the ita who was totally not defending herself and her disgusting fungus sneakers last thread.
Her insta was public before then.
Hi A

>> No.10632931

>>10632815
That’s not even Lolita it’s a cheap Aliexpress Lolita costume… I know this because I have it too

>> No.10632932

>>10632891
this is fine, sometimes you just wanna have your usukumya worn on the front for maximum hugging, nothing wrong with that

>> No.10632937

>>10632925
Before zooming in i was like oh no, what’s wrong with her face. Zoomed in and i’m disgusted instead of feeling sorry.

>> No.10632976

>>10632925
I see they took the Lor stance of "I'm already ugly, might as well go all in on it"

>> No.10632980

>>10632929
KEK ok that's funny

>> No.10633004
File: 133 KB, 1078x1325, 20210616_162703.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633004

>> No.10633005 [DELETED] 
File: 363 KB, 1079x1424, 20210616_162122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633005

>> No.10633008

>>10633005
Get real.

>> No.10633016

>>10633005
Not ita. This is just casual. I've seen older street snaps that look like this

>> No.10633023

>>10633005
Come on, this looks cool. I can’t figure out how that choker thing works if your arm isn’t folded up, but it looks cool anyway.

>> No.10633036
File: 175 KB, 640x911, tumblr_63f0c18adcee01fd230fb2e2c91d47b6_5f9ae7b2_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633036

>> No.10633038
File: 221 KB, 1078x1332, 20210616_201132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633038

>> No.10633039

>>10633036
Please tell me this wasn't tagged as lolita

>> No.10633043

>>10632885
Of course. It's Amazon.

>> No.10633044

>>10632929
Lol
What a pussy

>> No.10633045

>>10633038
KEK disgusting sissy, I can hear the cheap tulle crinkling from here

>> No.10633047

>>10633004
This is some ageplay crap.

>> No.10633053
File: 362 KB, 1366x2048, E4BLDBEVgAYMo5G.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633053

>> No.10633056

>>10633053
Didn't we see this before but in shittier lighting?

>> No.10633059

>>10632925
What the fuck

>> No.10633061

>>10633038
Absolutely vile

>> No.10633062

>>10633004
This outfit would look ok on a thin and cute woman who isn’t a man.

>> No.10633069
File: 263 KB, 1076x1068, 20210616_204238.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633069

>> No.10633081
File: 36 KB, 445x428, get-away-from-me~2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633081

>>10633069

>> No.10633168

>>10633036
She spent so much time doing her makeup yet couldnt bother to shave her hairy legs...

>> No.10633169

>>10633062
sorry about your shit taste

>> No.10633170

>>10633069
Cursed image

>> No.10633172
File: 291 KB, 1080x1056, 20210616_204341.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633172

>> No.10633186

>>10632929
Jfc. I know I'm just gonna get attacked, but I'd like to get this off my chest. I wasn't trying to defend my nasty sneakers. I was trying to defend my shirt.

There you go, that's me fully admitting I'm the Cupcake Ita. Asking "what's wrong with this? seems balanced" though? You could say that was me asking for concrit while trying to avoid exposing myself. I know the shoes are ass, they're my errand running shoes. The shirt though? Now I know that white t shirts are not good. So thanks for that, I guess.
Should I have just admitted it was me and fucked off? Yeah. I acted like a moron.

As for privating- that was because somebody asked who I was, and I was fully expecting to be harassed. The 'misinformation' bit is about the Little Witch cutsew, which I'm not gonna get into unless somebody actually asks because I know yall don't want me to keep yapping.

>> No.10633194

>>10633186
Why do you even come here? Is it just a form of self harm for you?

>> No.10633196

>>10633186
this is the wrong place to try to get good concrit. If you're not done with your cord, don't use lolita tags.
Also I must ask, why post your outfit with the worst shoes possible?

>> No.10633197

>>10633194
Quarantine boredom will fuck an ita up.

>> No.10633198

>>10633196
In retrospect I definitely should have cropped out my feet.

>> No.10633203

>>10633186
Hahahahahahaha I knew it. Your sperging about English was so dumb, at least you owned up. Still stupid of you to do that here though, should have just let the attention die off.

>> No.10633204

>>10633198
Still an ugly coord, filthy sneakers or not.
Do yourself a favour and wash them hun, you'll get athlete's foot.

>> No.10633207

>>10633186
Fuck off back to EGL Wall of Shame you hypocritical scalping ita

>> No.10633210

>>10633204
Oh, I'm getting rid of them dw

>> No.10633213

>>10633207
Ahahaha there it is... if anyone actually wants the real story behind that cursed cutsew, ask away.

it's not actually that interesting, but ideally I'd like to clear up the misinformation.

>> No.10633225

>>10633036
This person needs a shower, stat.
I dont understand how people can put makeup on but not shower.

>> No.10633229

>>10633213
Nobody cares about you that much dirty sneaker chan. We're just here to laugh at karma being served and your ugly coords.

>> No.10633230

>>10633229
nayrt but post some itas then instead of ranting about how much you don't care.

>> No.10633231

>>10633172
I thought at first glance that this was Shane Dawson kek

>> No.10633233
File: 466 KB, 1080x1699, 1623471765589.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633233

>>10633230

>> No.10633234

>>10633233
Touche

>> No.10633241

>>10633069
Khajit is begging for the sweet release if death

>> No.10633242

>>10633069
Monster High does not deserve this

>> No.10633245

>>10633230
>nayrt
Sure Jan
>>10633233
Kek

>> No.10633263
File: 194 KB, 1200x1600, azity3m4hh571.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633263

>> No.10633265

>>10633263
nightmare person

>> No.10633274

>>10633186
I'm the anon who bought up the scalping in the last thread and I have a legitimate question for you, why do you participate in the salt group so viciously if your a massive ita yourself? Don't you feel like a hypocrite? And why would you do that and then post garbage coords on instagram, did you not think people would put two and two together?

>> No.10633278

>>10633036
why would anyone want their watermark on this photo

>>10633186
never defend yourself on 4chan you make it worse

>>10633263
imagine still taking pictures this way in 2021

>> No.10633281

>>10633274
I never made fun of people with bad coords in EGL wall of shame iirc. I didn't think people wouldn't put two and two together, no. I don't really bother much with privacy on the internet, it's pointless. I do wish people would give me concrit though.

>> No.10633283

>>10633053
when will she stop wearing those ugly shoes with every coord

>> No.10633284

>>10633281
concrit: do not wear plain t shirts with lolita pieces. buy some cutsews cheap from the Japanese secondhand sites. always wear socks. buy some sturdy comfy tea parties and burn those other shoes.

>> No.10633285

>>10633284
Thank you for real lol

Got plenty of lolita shoes but I still need some tea parties. A heel height I can actually run errands in.

>> No.10633293

>>10633281
I actually wasn't referring to you discussing bad coords, the way you and several other regular posters in that group act really rubs people the wrong way. You come off as condescending, know it all's who are completely talking out your ass because, well you are.

While we're here I would like to hear your side of the cursed cutsew story please.

>> No.10633296

>>10633285
Trust me anon you do not want to be running errands in tea parties. They are low heel height, but also crazy uncomfortable if your standing on your feet for then like ten minutes. Even brand ones are super uncomfortable with no support, but maybe it’s just me cause I’ve got super high arches and even with inserts it feels like standing flat-flooted on concrete.

>> No.10633297

>>10633069
>>10633172
>lolita is not a costume

>> No.10633298

>>10633293
If I came off as condescending, it definitely wasn't intentional. Usually if I'm being snarky, I'm pretty straightforward with it.

ah ok so the cutsew... it is in fact, not a story of me being a scalper, but a story of me being an absolute fucking dumbass.

I bought it for $481, and soon after realized how stupid that was. When it arrived, I listed it on LM for the same price I bought it for. But like I said, I was being an utter smoothbrain and didn't add proof photos. While I was at it, I also threw it on my Ebay, but this time for 600 not because I would actually make that money, but to cover Ebay's ridiculous fees.

The one on LM was reported after a few days for not having a proof photo, and I didn't bother to remake the listing because I decided to procrastinate.

All that was left was the Ebay listing with the extra cost to cover the fees and hopefully get back what I spent (like a moron).

I wouldn't post them in the ita thread but I do have screenshots of everything.

so yeah. I'm a lot of things. I'm an ita, and a tard. But I'm not a scalper.

>> No.10633299

>>10633296
Well that sucks a truckload of ass. Hopefully I'll figure something out though, I wanna get out of this ita phase asap.

>> No.10633302

>>10633296
I think it's just you because I can wear my teaparties for pretty long distances just fine, only cushioned sneakers are more comfortable than that. Imo it's something that people need to try out for themselves, luckily the sosic teaparties aren't expensive and can still be resold if they're a bad fit to get some money back.

>> No.10633304

>>10633298
stop. you're embarrassing as fuck. no one at all cares about you one way or another so please get over yourself. this isn't even an excuse, it's barely an explanation. you're really not doing anything by replying here other than giving people more ammunition. fuck off.

>> No.10633305

Can ita Chan gtfo this board

>> No.10633306

>>10633298
>hurdur muh fees
please kys off the board.

>> No.10633307

>>10633299
If you reaaaally want to wear sneakers, you can though. But in actual casual sweet styling and using sneakers that look closer to what brands have released before. Speaking of which, AP is going to release some sneakers again. They've been putting out a lot of cute stuff that's perfect for casual such as cutsew shirts and hoodies. Also while I'm at it, you're probably better off not buying scalped listings after missing a release because 99.9% of the time it's not worth it and will just put you in another bad position like with the LW Cutsew OP. Most scalped listings calm down whenever the hype dies down, the best thing you can do is learn how to be patient and git gud at releases. Good luck ita-chan, you're going to need it.

>> No.10633308

>>10633307
Oh thank god, I've been wanting casual AP shoes for ages. No, I won't let them decay lmao

Thanks for being civil about the cutsew incident.

>> No.10633309

>>10633296
nah, throw some insoles in and you're good

>> No.10633311

>>10633308
dreamybows has some cute sneakers

>> No.10633312

>>10633308
The new ones look like they're made of their sturdy enamel pleather too, so they shouldn't have any infamous peeling issues hopefully.

Another piece of advice: please stop posting in the ita thread and lurk moar. The damage is already done for now, but it's best to refrain from posting in the future. As other anons have pointed out, /cgl/ isn't the best place for concrit (anymore).

>> No.10633324

>>10633298
If you really do have proof that your not a scalper you should probably clear the air and post it somewhere, it can't really get any worse for you in regards to privacy and anonymity.

As for snark maybe you should withhold some of it until your an actual lolita, the one prerequisite for being a lolita is wearing lolita and that's apparently something that's eluded you. As long as your an ita any opinion you have about lolita subjects will be disregarded by the community.

>> No.10633327

>>10633324
If I find a suitable board I'll drop it there.

>> No.10633329

>>10633298
And yet you go after other people on the regular for "scalping" when they could also be covering fees and the cost they paid. This is exactly why people call you a hypocrite.
Not only that, you've actually harassed sellers in their comments and bragged about it. But when the heat turns towards you, suddenly you're the victim. You live by the sword, you die by the sword.
If you didn't need to explain your prices then other people need to explain to you about their prices. People are becoming afraid to list anything slightly pricey on lace market because of you and other people like you. People are getting DMs accusing them of scalping as well as comments.

>> No.10633333

>>10633327
I was thinking perhaps one of your personal accounts? Also literally any shoes would be better than those, even just basic maryjanes in a matching colour or black/brown with some cute shoe clips. I hope in future you'll have enough self esteem and self respect to not let shoes like that in your house, let alone on your body.

>> No.10633334

>>10633329
I already had that discussion with someone months ago and owned up to my hypocrisy. Here is me owning up again.

>> No.10633337

>>10633333
I wasn't planning on going public again so soon but I'll drop it on Insta. Not sure if that self esteem comment was well meaning or condescending but I'll take it either way lol

>> No.10633338

>>10633334
Then prove you've changed and stop shit stirring in the salt groups. Hell, leave them entirely. Clearly they're affecting how you interact with the community at large.

>> No.10633340
File: 921 KB, 280x210, SaneDisgustingAtlanticridleyturtle-max-1mb.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633340

Please stop posting

>> No.10633341

>>10633298
are you the same person who posted body check pics to prove you werent fat when some anon called you a fatty in passing

you come across that way, because you talk a lot about shit that no one cares about. this is an anon board for a reason. if you see something about yourself, just read it, learn from it, and move on. literally.

>> No.10633344

>>10633338
You're not wrong.

Anyway, I'd really like to end this now esp after being gnomed. You gulls enjoy yourselves

>> No.10633346

>>10633337
It was genuine concern, my last piece of advice is to stop replying to this thread and settle down a bit on facebook. Good luck Ita-chan!

>> No.10633349

>>10633285
Get Doc Martens mary janes

>> No.10633353

>>10633337
What’s your insta? I’ll be curious to see it

>> No.10633435

>>10633233
I have never seen radioactive cupcakes coorded well

>> No.10633438

>>10632925
Thanks I hate it

>> No.10633477 [DELETED] 

>>10633341
No dat was me lmao I’m not scalper Cham and I’m also very sorry about that

>> No.10633478

>>10633341
No that was me, I’m not ita/scalper chan, and I’m very sorry about that incident

>> No.10633482
File: 139 KB, 1078x1325, 20210616_202043.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633482

Another ita for you gulls

>> No.10633484

>>10633482
Beard, cheap costume, black and white striped otk’s, gotta love it!!

>> No.10633486

>>10633482
PLEASE SHAVE YOUR FUCKING FACIAL HAIR BEFORE YOU WEAR LOLITA

>> No.10633497
File: 246 KB, 1080x1059, 20210617_164026.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633497

>> No.10633499

>>10633497
I saw this on insta and almost posted but it’s so far off I’m not even sure if it’s supposed to be lolita at this point, either way it’s super cheap and looks awful

>> No.10633501
File: 143 KB, 1080x1332, FB_IMG_1623963364329.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633501

>> No.10633503

>>10633499
Only reason i put it was because they had it posted lolita in a bunch of places lmao

>> No.10633505

>>10633501
THE BOOTS

>> No.10633519
File: 231 KB, 1078x1061, 20210616_203750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633519

>> No.10633526

>>10633519
Oh noooo... oh noo... this coord would look so cute on someone who isn't a scrote.

>> No.10633527

>>10633519
KEKEKEK that second pic could be a reaction image, she looks like she's leaning against the wall to rest like an old woman or someone that's very done with everyone's shit

>> No.10633529
File: 193 KB, 1079x1055, 20210617_172641.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633529

>> No.10633531

>>10633519
I can’t tell if this image is edited but that red is so fucking bright

>> No.10633537
File: 225 KB, 1079x1257, 20210617_174022.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633537

>> No.10633539

>>10633537
God, that's A LOT of garbage items from aliexpress.

>> No.10633572
File: 3.88 MB, 1704x2048, Screenshot_20210617-173918.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633572

>> No.10633574

>>10633572
why does this look like one of those zoo photo setups that has a cutout for the kids' faces?

>> No.10633575

>>10632815

>> No.10633607

>>10633527
“She”

>> No.10633620

>>10633607
Oh now I see it lulz

>> No.10633621

>>10633537
Wish scrotes would realize they don't get a penis pass for shitty low effort coords

>> No.10633629

>>10633482
Nice beard k*ller show.

>> No.10633636
File: 117 KB, 546x1065, 20210617_201930.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633636

Cropped bc there was a kid in the pic

>> No.10633637

>>10633636
This makes me glad that my mom made me get braces in high school.

>> No.10633641

>>10633636
Taobao's sweet atrocities give me a headache

>> No.10633643
File: 724 KB, 635x840, madonna kink garters.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633643

Why the garters?

>> No.10633646

>>10633643
Not making an outfit sexy is simply unbearable to some

>> No.10633648
File: 819 KB, 480x810, I thought steampunk died over 5 years ago.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633648

Is posting from Lor videos cheating?

>> No.10633650

>>10633648
God is It easy to do steampunk dirty

>> No.10633653

>>10633501
you too? my fucking sides when I saw this on my timeline and checked the group name

>> No.10633657

>>10633636
I know we throw around the word ageplay a lot but this really does look like some ageplay shit

>> No.10633661

>>10633482
I'd take this over sexy baby any day. At least he has a hairbrush.

>> No.10633671

>>10633661
Damn where did sexy baby go anyway

>> No.10633697
File: 87 KB, 802x1426, FB_IMG_1623982096865.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633697

Kill it with fire

>> No.10633700

>>10633697
So fucking ugly, oh my god
Just no

>> No.10633701

>>10633697
This is AMAZING. Takes me back to 2007 rave scenes

>> No.10633703

>>10633701
Yeah. But not lolita. Jesus christ, I just saw this pop up on my feed and it doesn't belong in the lolita community whatsoever. It's great to get inspiration from lolita, but don't plaster this as "lolita" infront of us all.

>> No.10633704

>>10633701
Confirmed garbage taste.
This is ugly even for cyber goth.

>> No.10633706

>>10633697
This sucks. And is not lolita.

>> No.10633711

>>10633650
I've seen steampunk done well exactly once. When it's done well, it looks absolutely amazing, but it's so easy to fuck up I don't think newbies should try it.

>> No.10633727
File: 150 KB, 1079x1046, 20210617_225446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633727

>> No.10633730
File: 234 KB, 1080x1315, 20210617_230315.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633730

>> No.10633735

>>10633697
God I am so sick of these demonias

>> No.10633739

>>10633697
Her disgusting furry shit mixed with lolita looked better than this

>> No.10633742

>>10633697
wow i love this

>> No.10633766

>>10633742
ita

>> No.10633795

>>10633742
seek help

>> No.10633800

Help me figure something out. Which gender is the more dominant on this board--male or female? I imagine you all are a gaggle of scrawny, catty, weeaboo females.

Also, tempest is a whore

>> No.10633802

>>10633800
Leave scrote

>> No.10633805

>>10633800
what are you even rambling about?

>> No.10633806

>>10633697
Not lolita and not my thing, but not bad,

>> No.10633817

>>10633069
this is epic at at least 4 levels!

>> No.10633819

>>10633197
based

>> No.10633821

>>10633526
Wtf no it wouldn’t.

>> No.10633822

>>10633697
this is cool, pudelitas be gone

>> No.10633825

>>10633697
even for cyber goth, I think this would be better with a plain black dress. even if the dress itself is a rainbow graident, it looks busy

>> No.10633838

>>10633671
into his sexy baby play pen

>> No.10633841

>>10633806
>>10633822
>>10633701
>>10633742
I'm concerned about cgl's taste level

>> No.10633845

>>10633841
for being alt fashion it isnt the worst I have seen. it is not my style, and it is definitely not lolita, but it is better than a lot of shit out there in alt fashion of that type.

>> No.10633851

>>10633841
most of the people here are lolitas at heart and don't actually wear the fashion, it's not surprising

>> No.10633868

>>10633800
Meow tan is not a whore she's perfect in every way! She's the western Misako. You're just mad. SEETHE jelly scrote.

>> No.10633925

>>10633800
Scrotes should be put to sleep

>> No.10633997
File: 290 KB, 1152x2048, 3vh8m16xi0671.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10633997

>> No.10634000

>>10633529
How people can show off to the entire world the disgusting squalor that they live in is beyond me. Not to mention this coord looks like it came from the trash heap... So I guess it's suiting... This mess is insufferable to look at.

>> No.10634005

>>10633800
Scote that knows meow_tan spotted
>>10633868
meow_tan spotted. stfu. you make this way too obvious when you post.

>> No.10634023

>>10634005
This is the 2nd time I see scrote written like that in a day lmao

>> No.10634077
File: 1.79 MB, 748x1354, RDT_20210618_2033195732650402294411677.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634077

>> No.10634080

>>10633800
Tits or GTFO.

>> No.10634084

>>10632891
>>10634077
You vendettas are a whole new level of stupid. These look fine. The second one is kind of meh, but its not ita.

>> No.10634102

>>10634084
It's only meh because of her horse teeth imo

>> No.10634125

>>10634077
Has issues but not ita

>> No.10634131

>>10634077
nothing matches, a mess.

>> No.10634136

>>10634084
>>10634102
>>10634125

Larpers confirmed.

>> No.10634158

>>10633800
>tempest is a whore
What would a scrote have against her?

>> No.10634159
File: 25 KB, 561x399, 352958295723985289342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634159

>>10633727

>> No.10634164

>>10634077
This is good. Nitpick

>> No.10634168

>>10633038
Please tell me this sissy was not tagged as lolita. Or brolita.

>> No.10634189

>>10632925
Can these enbies give it a rest?

>> No.10634193
File: 308 KB, 1074x1327, 20210617_233520.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634193

>> No.10634194

>>10634193
Holy shit can a chin be ita

>> No.10634203

>>10633537
Each passing day i hate men in lolita a bit more

>> No.10634205

>>10633727
She is giving me "sistah" vibes.

>> No.10634209
File: 510 KB, 1076x1078, Screenshot_20210619-013315_Instagram.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634209

>> No.10634217

>>10634209
Come on, this isn't ita just some lighthearted fun

>> No.10634226

>>10634077
Oompa Loompa kei

>> No.10634239

>>10634205
wtf is sista vibes

>> No.10634242

>>10634209
This is cute

>> No.10634245

>>10634239
If It helps you understand anon there is giving racista vibes

>> No.10634254

>>10634136
You sound extremely autistic

>> No.10634268

>>10634005
you're a moron if you think this >>10633868 obvious bait comment was meow tan herself

>> No.10634283

>>10633727
Did she try to use all the white girl culture she could find or something?
>cheap aliexpress normie shirt that probably had "Korean" somewhere in the title
>rave girl makeup
>lolita
>Kardashian wannabe lipstick

>> No.10634284

>>10633868 and >>10634005 is the same person

>> No.10634285

>>10633727
I think this is cute

>> No.10634286

>>10634283
Lol you’re really reaching for straws

>> No.10634296

>>10634000
because of the dress and messy background, it reminds me of that photo of the ita in the wrecked kitchen

>> No.10634298
File: 402 KB, 582x1323, 20210619_000449.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634298

>> No.10634307

>>10634194
Yes.

>> No.10634312
File: 337 KB, 1080x1328, 20210619_002143.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634312

>> No.10634315
File: 220 KB, 1078x1322, 20210619_005059.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634315

>> No.10634322
File: 190 KB, 1080x1055, 20210619_003619.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634322

>> No.10634324

>>10634284
I would never tell our flawless queen Meow tan to shut up.

>> No.10634326
File: 324 KB, 1080x1330, 20210619_004122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634326

>> No.10634334

>>10634284
you're an actual idiot.

>>10634324
go back to bed, meow_tan

>> No.10634335
File: 1.03 MB, 1332x2305, IMG_20210619_094152.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634335

>> No.10634336

>>10634326
Everything about this makes me wanna bang my head into the wall

>> No.10634338

>>10633478
It is okay anon. Just remember that you never owe anyone here anything when it comes to random shit. It is anon for a reason. Take care of yourself.

>> No.10634340

>>10634298
I feel sorry for this person, because the coord itself is kinda cute. I hate the blouse, as it looks cheap and is too white for the rest of the whites, but otherwise it is nice. but they have a fridge shaped torso and a homely face.

>> No.10634341

>>10634340
oh, and the hat. the hat sucks, but s-he had a decent idea.

>> No.10634365

>>10634285
It's not. Did you see the shitty forever 21 blouse?

>> No.10634379
File: 547 KB, 828x1315, FBBF425A-45B7-40EE-8A74-D0AF37ED831D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634379

>>10634296
This one anon?

>> No.10634386

>>10634077
Ok she’s nice and I like a lot of her coords but are y’all drunk? This looks genuinely awful. Literally none of these pieces go together.

>> No.10634403
File: 279 KB, 1074x1908, Screenshot_20210618-205758_TikTok.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634403

>> No.10634406

>>10634379
I think anon is talking about that photo of a girl in a purple and black dress surrounded by a huge mess
>>10634403
Colorblind-kei

>> No.10634407

>>10634386
I said this coord wasn't that bad further up thread but I actually change my mind now. I was too blinded by the eye searing filter.

>> No.10634411

>>10634209
>having fun is not allowed and ita

>> No.10634420

>>10633730
What is this.

>> No.10634433

>>10634334
>calls someone an idiot
>can’t detect sarcasm/trolling

She’s not even posted in this thread under that name but you brought her up

>> No.10634452

>>10632815
>yet another "this doesn't look ita" followed by clicking the thumbnail and recoiling

>> No.10634500

>>10633727
This picture just screams "an ai oop"

>> No.10634501

>>10633730
I kind of like this idea but it's still kind of cringe.

>> No.10634538
File: 297 KB, 1079x1045, 20210619_145234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634538

>> No.10634541
File: 219 KB, 1073x1323, 20210619_151601.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634541

>> No.10634543

>>10634538
This wasn't tagged as lolita though?

>> No.10634544

>>10634543
Ayrt oops it came under my feed when I put lolita fashion in. My bad

>> No.10634588
File: 110 KB, 680x680, f5753870a40ccef114a6cb88e7f48531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634588

>>10632925
what is this monstrosity. looks like something I could fish out from the toilet.

>> No.10634590

>>10634541
this coord confuses me? i think theyre trying to go for a bittersweet look but its like they gave up halfway through by not tucking in the blouse lol

>> No.10634596

>>10634538
I actually love this but yeah it’s not lolita at all

>> No.10634632

>>10634538
This isn’t tagged as lolita. Go shake the sand out of your bloomers.

>> No.10634699
File: 1.44 MB, 2048x2048, 183057756_3235972576629335_7684705614000109589_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634699

her hair is so ratty

>> No.10634711

>>10633997
Carrie Underwood kei

>> No.10634714

>>10634322
Thought that cloche hat hanging in the background was a persons head and my heart stopped

>> No.10634716

>>10634379
Oh honey...this is clean compared to what they're probably talking about.
This more just looks like they're moving and are half finished packing or unpacking

>> No.10634719

>>10634298
This has to be a man

>> No.10634784 [DELETED] 

>>10634315
I have this dress and probably weigh a couple stone less than this person and it’s fine in the waist but tight in the bust. I can’t imagine how they even got into this jsk. Poor chibi neko

>> No.10634828

>>10634699
the worst parts of this are the tshirt and the sideways skirt.

>> No.10634880
File: 1.45 MB, 1080x1223, Screenshot_20210620-230311~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634880

>> No.10634883
File: 46 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1624203058879.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634883

Of course a kpop stan would have no taste

>> No.10634887
File: 90 KB, 768x1024, bce6e89e63e7204ceb967713e70b1284b82bc004r1-1536-2048v2_hq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634887

>> No.10634889

>>10634883
At least it's not a weeb.

>> No.10634890

>>10634889
Same kind of shit

>> No.10634895
File: 167 KB, 1024x768, E4TBh8BWUAo4PdG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634895

>> No.10634896

>>10634889
Yeah, it's worse.

>> No.10634898

>>10634896
Weebs are worse. But that's just me.

>> No.10634900 [DELETED] 
File: 183 KB, 832x800, E4TBjyJWUAIXHkx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634900

>>10632891
Why do people wear these shit shoes while dressing like this? Now that I think about it, it actually fits because it's all shit.

>> No.10634901

>>10634898
Kpop stans are insufferable but we'll have to agree to disagree.

>> No.10634903
File: 183 KB, 832x800, E4TBjyJWUAIXHkx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634903

>> No.10634904

>>10634901
K.
Fine by me.

>> No.10634905
File: 176 KB, 1020x1661, E4Ute_iUYAIez9X.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634905

>> No.10634910

>>10634898
At least most weebs stick to 2d
Kpop fags be breaking into idols houses and shipping them and shit kek

>> No.10634921

>>10634905
Fucking monstrosity, this is literally just a blue maid costume

>> No.10634922

>>10634887
Buy a petti

>> No.10634923

>>10634904 I can feel your butt hurt

>> No.10634924

>>10634923
I wasn't mad. I just said it was fine.

>> No.10634929

>>10634924
K. It’s fine. I’m not even upset. >:(

>> No.10634930

>>10634904
Kpop stans are 100% worse, this is coming from a 2010s ex Kpop stan and weeb

>> No.10634933

>>10634929
you talk like you're 15, please go play outside

>> No.10634935

>>10634245
kek

>> No.10634936
File: 91 KB, 1080x1440, FB_IMG_1624206336339.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10634936

>> No.10634938

>>10634901
kpop stans are at most 18-24, weebs keep their obsession to the grave

>> No.10634939

>>10634930
Definitely. Been friends with both and used to be a weeb, koreaboos are way too intense, almost scary even.

>> No.10634943

>>10634939
nayrt but yeah koreaboos are mostly intense about it and weebs are mostly moderate/lowkey

>> No.10634944

>>10633519
are we sure this isn't a touhou costume?

>>10634193
Everything seems to fit decently. Take off the cat ears and i'd say this is fine.

>>10634209
could be a fun hoverlolita

>> No.10634949

>>10634936
Please someone explain why this guy isn't banned from COF yet, I can't stand him. Creepy af.

>> No.10634954

>>10634936
Can this geriatric scrote croak already?

>> No.10634972

>>10634936
cute concept, horrendous execution

>> No.10634985

>>10633036
Imagine thinking this is a lolita coord. WTF. A y shirt with a skirt and flip flops. This isn't lolita you lor-ita. For fuck sake.

>> No.10634987

>>10633045
About to type the same Anon. Jfc

>> No.10634988

>>10634209
Thanks to whoever posted this. I have a new wishlist item. Curse me for never following AATP. This is a cute, simple coord. It's a shame that newbies think non-pro photoshoots = ita these days.

>> No.10635000

>>10634887
That has got to be one of the worst fitting salopettes I have ever seen. No petti. Low effort, sloppy mess. Did we just forget that lolita was about presentation? Because it is the dress we are presenting, this fashion is about show casing the dress. Thanks Lor for heading up the ita flood gates careless massacres of cheap ass sloppy clown shit shows.

>> No.10635002

>>10634895
Itas are just in mass production this summer.

>> No.10635003

>>10634903
At some point it's just no longer lolita
It's just a grabage dump. Not even ita as the goal of lolita is just lost.

>> No.10635009

>>10633004
Putin in a dress and wig. It's him, he isn't fooling anyone!

>> No.10635016

This thread is giving me motivation to stick to my diet thanks anons

>> No.10635019

>>10634895
It's terrible for current year but I can't truly hate this it looks like a picture from the early 2000s when lolitas in the west made do with what they could find or sew.

>> No.10635027

>>10634939
I remember I used to be put into group chats with random fans and everyone would state their ultimate bias which they "claimed", so if you would have the same bias you would be forced to choose someone else or they would get so mad and you'd get thrown out of the group just as easily

>> No.10635037

>>10634905
Someone come get their mom

>> No.10635082
File: 917 KB, 2048x2048, 192779164_3255001458059780_3870182984717451688_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10635082

>> No.10635099

>>10635082
I actually like this. Maybe I'm not seeing something.

>> No.10635100

>>10635082
This is cute and her hair looks nice

>> No.10635103

>>10634905
Looks like a lowkey troon

>> No.10635107

>>10635099
Me too lol

>> No.10635122

>>10635082
this is literally a good coord?

>> No.10635124 [DELETED] 

>>10634905
Same energy

>> No.10635126
File: 8 KB, 203x248, images (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10635126

>>10634905
Same energy

>> No.10635127

>>10635122
from a distance

>> No.10635131

>>10633537
Men are such fucking attention whores oh my god

>> No.10635132

>>10635082
What's bad about this apart from the Walmart shoes? Is it a replica?

>> No.10635295

>>10633643
her accessories look cheap as fuck, and wtf is with the normie shorts

>> No.10635296

>>10634403
mental illness sjw vibes

>> No.10635297

>>10635082
i kinda like this, but the lace looks so glaringly cheap and bad. and it is everywhere.

>> No.10635345

>>10635297
>it doesn't

>> No.10635352

>>10634905
Damn, pinkdreamd*ll is looking rough

>> No.10635364

>>10634936
This is an a incredible coord. I’m assuming we hate it bc the guy wearing it is a creep?

>> No.10635372

>>10635364
He's done good coords but this isn't one, much lesss an "incredible coord"

>> No.10635381

>>10635345
it does though

>> No.10635383

>>10635364
>incredible
>all that random shit shoe-horned waist up
Anon please stop licking it's wrinkly ass

>> No.10635385

>>10634936
To be fair, if a cute girl wore this, it would be obvious that this is a good coord. He did a good job combining items, it's just hard to ignore that this is an old man.

>> No.10635399

>>10635297
It's a moitie apron anon

>> No.10635400

>>10635381
please go see an eye doctor

>> No.10635403

>>10635399
No it isn’t. Do you see any cross lace of their logo? It’s a cheap apron from Taobao

>> No.10635408

>>10635403
Searched for it and it's a To Alice apron

>> No.10635415

>>10635399
The absolute state of sweet lolitas and their knowledge of gothic

>> No.10635434

>>10635400
I wasnt even really talking about the apron desu, just all the lace everywhere else. but the apron does look cheap to me as well. apron aside (it looks like cheap taobao to me), all the other lace all over is ugly and cheap looking regardless.

>> No.10635446

>>10635415

Sweets making asses of themselves in other substyles seems to be a given. They really love to pretend they're experts in something they clearly have no clue what they're talking about.

>> No.10635447

>>10635385
He's pretty damn good at coording but yikes it'll never look good on his old man face/body.

>> No.10635485
File: 957 KB, 828x1026, 95D773BC-E6C4-4613-8B8C-F01949D77076.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10635485

Why are itas still wearing cat ears in the year 2021?

>> No.10635506

>>10635485
The creepy dolls and dirty shoes just add so much to the awful vibe this photo is giving off

>> No.10635507

>>10635506
The dolls are the nicest part about this photo tho

>> No.10635519

>>10635485
the tail is way worse than the ears

>> No.10635579
File: 88 KB, 336x160, NAUSEATING.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10635579

>>10635485
the absolute state of those shoes

>> No.10635585

>>10635519
this

>> No.10635696
File: 2.63 MB, 1816x2421, 21-05-18-14-43-39-372_deco.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10635696

Why is her fat ass showing up on my feed always? It's kinda sad how she tries

>> No.10635697

>>10635507
My thoughts exactly. The dolls are lovely.
Normalfags are the only ones who find regular-ass porcelain dolls creepy

>> No.10635698

>>10635696
What comm is this girl from? Or is she a lonelita? She looks like someone I know

>> No.10635699

>>10635696
Cute coord

>> No.10635700

>>10635698
Her Instagram says she's from Houston Texas

>> No.10635701

>>10635696
oh also this belongs in the nitpick thread. the hat and wig look cheap and she would be better off posing inside so we can actually see her eyes (or she just needs to not squint so much when she smiles) but everything else is fine here.

>> No.10635702

>>10635696
who is this? she looks fine. just block her so she doesnt show up in tags if you hate her so much

>> No.10635705

>>10635700
Kek Houston comm is filled with fatties

>> No.10635742

>>10635697
The original anon is probably a normalfag, lolita and porcelain dolls+bjds are borderline sister hobbies.

>> No.10635744

>>10635742
those cheap aliexpress hanfu dolls are creepy, i don't know what kind of shit you're on.

>> No.10635753

>>10635364
>>10635385
>>10635447
You're not good at coording if you can't match it to your body tb h, this is a terrible coord because he looks gross in it. The proof is in the pudding.

(I also think the glasses don't work at all and wouldn't work on a cute girl either)

>> No.10635754

>>10635742
No, I love nice porcelain dolls. Key word NICE. But those all look cheap and have ugly and cheap looking outfits. Way to out yourself as an ita. Doll collecting should be about quality not quantity. lolita is also about quality, which the dolls in questions seem to lack (at least from this photo of them)

>> No.10635786

>>10635705
At least it's not filled with predators and creeps.

>> No.10635796

How do you gulls feel about itas posting other itas?

For example, you catch someone posting images of other people, but their own coords are actually just as bad/worse than the people they're posting.

Would you call them out? Post them to see if they jump to their own defense like fungus sneaker ita?

Do you think itas SHOULD post other itas? It seems like a sad attempt to put down others because of self esteem issues. Do you think itas who post other itas really believe they're not ita? Even if they commit the same sins as other itas, like clothes that don't fit, mismatched arctic fox dyed hair, striped socks from amazon, etc? Or if you are ita, should you respect your fellow itas and stop trying to make yourself look big?

>> No.10635801

>>10635796
I assume that pretty much everyone who posts here is an ita, considering all the people who accidentally out themselves for posting itas are ita themselves. Like that fat burger chan. Plus, all these retards defending an ugly cheap apron saying that it's MmM..

>> No.10635803

>>10635786
You're really gonna say that when a bunch of HLC members were just quiet about the Leighs huh

>> No.10635853

>>10635803
I'm laughing at (you) because it's not 2017 anymore. Both comms have been vocally against the Leighs since then (HLC came under new management around that time), and it took a concerted effort from both comms to drive SiW out of business. No one in either group would be caught dead at AM. Quit living in the past.

>> No.10635949

>>10635853
Lol you act like SiW's takedown was JUST a Texas effort....

>> No.10636213

>>10635796
How do you even catch that?

>> No.10636237

>>10633648
Someone put that poor corset out of it's misery.

>> No.10636395

>>10635696
Hey vendetta-chan, I've noticed that almost every time you post her, the thread is saging. Are you afraid to post her pics in an active thread? Because you know this is not really ita and you'll get called out? I concur with >>10635702, block her and get over your hate boner.

>> No.10644047

>>10633697
I actually kinda like this. Usually itas just shoehorn those stupid shoes in everywhere at random, but this fits with the cyber goth theme. Also the colour scheme is cohesive, she has the lolita silhouette, and nothing looks cheap or shitty. It wouldn't fit into any existing lolita substyle, but I think it works as it's own thing.