Old School Thread

[Anonymous No.10533590]

Last one >>10523081

Does anybody have any pics of old school chokers?

[Anonymous No.10533642]

[Anonymous No.10533645]

>>10533642
Idk if this counts as oldschool

[Anonymous No.10533652]

>>10533645

[Anonymous No.10533656]

>>10533652

[Anonymous No.10536146]

>>10533656

[Anonymous No.10536148]

>>10536146

[Anonymous No.10536158]

>>10536148

[Anonymous No.10536159]

>>10536158

[Anonymous No.10536307]

IG tag dump

[Anonymous No.10536308]

>>10536307

[Anonymous No.10536309]

>>10536308

[Anonymous No.10536310]

>>10536309

[Anonymous No.10536312]

>>10536310

[Anonymous No.10536313]

>>10536312

[Anonymous No.10536315]

>>10536313

[Anonymous No.10536316]

>>10536315

[Anonymous No.10536318]

>>10536316

[Anonymous No.10536320]

>>10536318

[Anonymous No.10536321]

>>10536320

[Anonymous No.10536322]

>>10536321

[Anonymous No.10536323]

>>10536322

[Anonymous No.10536324]

>>10536323

[Anonymous No.10536325]

>>10536324

[Anonymous No.10536327]

>>10536325

[Anonymous No.10536328]

>>10536327

[Anonymous No.10536331]

>>10536328

[Anonymous No.10536332]

>>10536331

[Anonymous No.10536334]

>>10536332

[Anonymous No.10536335]

>>10536334

[Anonymous No.10536337]

>>10536335

[Anonymous No.10536339]

>>10536337

[Anonymous No.10536340]

>>10536339

[Anonymous No.10536341]

>>10536340

[Anonymous No.10536342]

>>10536341

[Anonymous No.10536343]

>>10536342

[Anonymous No.10536344]

>>10536343

[Anonymous No.10536345]

>>10536344

[Anonymous No.10536346]

>>10536345

[Anonymous No.10536347]

>>10536346

[Anonymous No.10536348]

>>10536347

[Anonymous No.10536349]

>>10536348

[Anonymous No.10536351]

>>10536349

[Anonymous No.10536352]

>>10536351

[Anonymous No.10536354]

>>10536352

[Anonymous No.10536356]

>>10536354

[Anonymous No.10536358]

>>10536356

[Anonymous No.10536359]

>>10536358

[Anonymous No.10536361]

>>10536359

[Anonymous No.10536362]

>>10536361

[Anonymous No.10536363]

>>10536362

[Anonymous No.10536364]

>>10536363

[Anonymous No.10536366]

>>10536364

[Anonymous No.10536368]

>>10536366

[Anonymous No.10536369]

>>10536368

[Anonymous No.10536370]

>>10536369

[Anonymous No.10536371]

>>10536370

[Anonymous No.10536372]

>>10536371

[Anonymous No.10536374]

>>10536372

[Anonymous No.10536375]

>>10536374
/end dump

[Anonymous No.10536465]

The absolute state of old school lolita

[Anonymous No.10536523]

so are taobao brands with old school inspired pieces that are mass so produced in sweatshops considered actual “old school” ?? asking for a friend

[Anonymous No.10536526]

>>10536523
No. Definitely not.

[Anonymous No.10536536]

I don't want to point out individual posts but you can slap on every shit you find and you are fine as long as you tag it oldschool? I don't think oldschool works like this but every one is free to like whatever they want I guess.

[Anonymous No.10536560]

>>10536536
the absolute state of neo oldschoolers . just wanna look like aliexpress misa misa and call it a day

[Anonymous No.10536750]

What's up with the shoop on >>10536356 her leg and >>10536364 her arm? Beyond bizarre.

[Anonymous No.10536763]

>>10536750
>>10536356
she just looks like that, she has a disability on one side. Has been discussed before, ie the wheelchair photo

[Anonymous No.10536768]

>>10536763
Anon, zoom in. It's a perfectly straight line of digital artifacts and half her knee has been erased.

[Anonymous No.10536770]

>>10536768
her cof post is the same though. IIRC she has cerebral palsy. Looks like one of her legs is atrophied.

[Anonymous No.10536771]

>>10536768
>>10536770
another cof post that's the same. I can't imagine anyone just shooping one leg anon.

[Anonymous No.10536773]

>>10536750
>>10536763
>>10536768
>>10536770
No one cares about your disability.

[Anonymous No.10536776]

>>10536770
>>10536771
Her legs look completely normal in these pictures. I mean, see what the other anon means about the first image but it just looks like jpeg compression to me.
Seriously though, stop shitting up the thread. You went overboard defending yourself no one asked you to post your old CoF posts.

[Anonymous No.10536812]

>>10536371
has melty pisces lost weight?

[Anonymous No.10536819]

>>10536812
She looks good, younger even.

[Anonymous No.10536820]

>>10536812
Good for her

[Anonymous No.10536873]

>>10536536
This is true for all lolita tags. Lots of things get tagged under the wrong style to get more interactions or whatever. It's pretty normal. This anon sharing instagram posts doesn't seem to realize that happens and is just dumping tons of shit here.

[Anonymous No.10536882]

ugly and or fat chicks wearing old school makes me so sad

[Anonymous No.10536884]

>>10536882
Imo they do better in old school than sweet. It will never not be jarring to see an ugly man-faced beast in sweet.

[Anonymous No.10536887]

>>10536884
I feel like fatties would look good in classic. The cuts would be flattering if they came in their sizes. Obviously not too fat but after a certain point no one looks good in anything.

[Anonymous No.10536893]

>>10536882
Only when it's old school?

[Anonymous No.10536903]

>>10536536
Taobaolita and ethot neo-oldschool coords are getting more popular. Like it or not this is what new oldschoolers wear now. It'd be nice to have a discussion about where the fashion's headed.

[Anonymous No.10536906]

>>10536903
do you think eventually people will start using neoschoollolita as a hashtag? should the two be differentiated on insta? (not that people wouldn't get it wrong anyway)

[Anonymous No.10536909]

>>10536903
the fashion can't be headed somewhere since it's based on the trends from a specific time period

[Anonymous No.10537799]

It's always amusing to see how salty gulls are about neo old schoolers and spending more time reeeeing about them and "what old skewl rly is u guise!1!" than actually discuss OS. You all sound bitter as fuck kek

[Anonymous No.10537893]

>>10537799
The reality is people are kind of torn between what old school is between being "old school" the style/substyle and "old street snaps of what the og Japanese lolitas used to wear", and that difference in definition is kind of what leads to the constant infighting in old school threads.

[Anonymous No.10537899]

>>10537893
Anon you replied to and t b h that's a good take. I did not see it this way and thought they were just bitter but i'm wrong i guess.

[Anonymous No.10537901]

>>10537899
I guess I'm just giving everyone the benefit of the doubt and assuming it's this since we always get the "it isn't true oldschool unless it's a literal KERA photograph from before 1999" memes and stuff from one side critiquing how it's always kind of debated if something is oldschool when it's from a non-Asian girl/in a newer looking picture.

[Anonymous No.10537926]

>>10537901
imo people who think it needs to be almost an exact replica of the 90s/00s are very closed minded and don't understand the progression of fashion
Like old trends are often brought back again, over and over. Like with the 80s inspired stuff h&m just put out.
Obviously lolita is it's own niche with its own trend economy but i think that what people call "neo school" is still good and still counts as old school.
Like you wouldn't compare like 2008-2012 sweet and current sweet and say they aren't the same thing anymore. Definitions evolve.
I think this infighting about what oldschool is or isn't is irrelevant.
It would be more beneficial and fun to talk about new coords and the way we coord old pieces.

[Anonymous No.10538501]

honestly this is kind of impressive

[Anonymous No.10538505]

>>10538501
What's going on with her face??

[Anonymous No.10538518]

>>10538501
Impressive in a cosplay way I guess

[Anonymous No.10538523]

>>10538501
Can't wait till Western lolitas stop skinwalking and come up with new ideas instead.

[Anonymous No.10538525]

>>10538501
That's so cool, i'd love to be able to recreate the look which made me love lolita.

[Anonymous No.10538531]

>>10538523
Western Lolita has never been about unique ideas lmfao

[Anonymous No.10538548]

>>10538531
Ok skinwalker

[Anonymous No.10538553]

>>10538518
I kind of see it similar to how people collect movie memorabilia. It's cool to have that exact thing y'know? especially with such a "famous" image

[Anonymous No.10538554]

>>10538523
Same, it's getting ridiculous. Especially due to the fact it's the opposite of the spirit of oldschool.

[Anonymous No.10538570]

>>10538505
She always shoops her face to absurd levels

[Anonymous No.10538579]

>>10538553

Reminds me of the vintage dress community where someone matches the dress to the ad from a Sears catalog. It's pretty cool imo, kind of like having some history.

[Anonymous No.10538580]

>>10538553
yeah. impressive that it's the same pieces. Like a cosplay

[Anonymous No.10538583]

>>10538554
better than taobaolitas that call their mass produced shit old school just cus it's tartan or in black and white kek

[Anonymous No.10538587]

>>10538553
Idk, glorifying random japanese girls in streetsnaps so much you literally start to cosplay them is too next level 5 me.

[Anonymous No.10538590]

>>10538553
Idk, glorifying/borderline objectifying random japanese girls in streetsnaps so much you literally start to cosplay them is too next level 5 me.

[Anonymous No.10538603]

>>10538590
i don't think anyone cares about the girl, just her outfit. cosplay includes acting like the character, not just "steal this look" which is a staple of fashion magazines

[Anonymous No.10538607]

>>10538501
It is kind of impressive but to be honest the coord itself doesn't suit her at all

[Anonymous No.10538608]

>>10538501
How tall is she? I want to know the length of dress as it is looking sissy-level short on her

[Anonymous No.10538611]

>>10538608
Afaik she isn't particularly tall at all, that dress is just short

[Anonymous No.10538616]

>>10538608
That dress is infamously short. This is common knowledge. You gonna have a prude attack over Hospitality Doll next?

[Anonymous No.10538620]

>>10538616
desu both look pretty bad on taller people

[Anonymous No.10538624]

>>10538608
> old school dress
>is too short

How new are you?

[Anonymous No.10538649]

>>10538501
J copies another coord? Impressively shocking.

[Anonymous No.10538666]

>>10538649
shut up MD

[Anonymous No.10538667]

Time for a dump, before this thread derails.

[Anonymous No.10538668]

[Anonymous No.10538669]

[Anonymous No.10538670]

[Anonymous No.10538671]

[Anonymous No.10538673]

[Anonymous No.10538675]

[Anonymous No.10538676]

[Anonymous No.10538684]

>>10538603
Lol no you don't have to rp to cosplay. And she's skinwalking her including hairstyle and pose.
>i don't think anyone cares about the girl
Exactly, which is why they see her like some kind of movie poster or merch instead of a normal person who just dressed up to hang out (or to get photographed).

[Anonymous No.10538700]

>>10538608
I’m only 5’2” and it ends at my coochie the dress is clearly intended to be worn with bloomers. While I think it’s weird to imitate a street snap piece by piece myself, this is the least valid complaint on this thread.

[Anonymous No.10538718]

>>10536337
What a weird self post

[Anonymous No.10538722]

>>10538684
Bc Im sure j "skinwalking" this coord totally destroyed the autonomy and personal life of the original lolita... Its 10+ year old photo, anon jfc.
>treating this poor japanese woman like a piece of meat ??!?!11

[Anonymous No.10538724]

>>10538722
Way to be deliberately obtuse. You're twisting her words and you know it lol.

[Anonymous No.10538756]

>>10538722
My point is how weird some oldschoolers are about girls in streetsnaps and how they view them, but way to avoid a proper conversation.

[Anonymous No.10538769]

>>10538570
that's unfortunate because she still looks fug... she shoops her jaw smaller but her face is so inherently disproportionate that no meitu can save it. rip

[Anonymous No.10538789]

does anyone own a maple wig in the natural brown colorway (pic related)? if so how true is the stock pic to real life? it looks really weirdly purple-y to me.

[Anonymous No.10538799]

>>10538756
recreating 1 snap isn't drama. if that girl was still active, they'd probably twin on IG like everybody does. i get what you mean about some people, but there is no evidence of that here. the wig is part of the coord, and the pose is just a pose. it's like saying kids doing fortnite dances are "skinwalking" as the characters. what a non-issue. i get if the caption was something creepy like, "i wonder what she was feeling when she wore this coord. i bet she chose kuro because she was suicidal over a break-up with her foreign lover", but it's nothing like that.

[Anonymous No.10538809]

>>10538799
^ this. People are just starting drama because they don't actually have anything negative to say about j. Just admit you're jealous of her wardrobe and move on.

[Anonymous No.10538812]

>>10538501

[Anonymous No.10538818]

>>10538799
No you obviously don't get what I'm saying. I'm neither talking about drama nor the other fallacys you throw around. If I found out some random people in asia obsess over a 10 yo picture of me to the point they literally start cosplaying me including my hairstyle, I'd be creeped tf out.
And no, trying out dances are not the same as 1:1 cosplaying normal, non-fictional people, zoomer-chan.

[Anonymous No.10538820]

>>10538809
Anon I literally have and had every piece of that coord except the shoes and bag but I'd never in my life do this because it's weird as fuck. And at least in my case I'm not talking about josine only, so no need to wk her this tragically.

[Anonymous No.10538822]

>>10538818
do you also feel this way about people wearing example coords that brands put out? or copying models?

[Anonymous No.10538824]

>>10538501
This furthers my belief that most oldschoolers just want to BE the girls in magazines.

[Anonymous No.10538825]

>>10538824
>>10538818
Lmao why the fuck are you guys freaking out about this? Sweet lolitas twin and ""copy"" each other all the time. The worst they get called is unoriginal. Wearing the same outfit as someone /=/ skinwalking. It would only be skinwalking if she was trying to be like this chick in all aspects - personality, interests, MULTIPLE OUTFIT COPIES. Not one fucking outfit from a street snap that was IN A MAGAZINE. You guys don't even know what skinwalking means.

Nayrt and not a zoomer. Also not an old schooler, but this thread is a trainwreck goddamn.

[Anonymous No.10538828]

>>10538822
>but what about [different thing]?
Just like trying out fortnight dances isn't the same like skinwalking someone, wearing sets is also not the same as skinwalking someone. I never saw anyone completely copying example coords or models down to the pose, hair and every item being exactly the same. Or anyone bother search for sold out/passed items to completely cosplay models (even "get the look" stuff in magazines usually aren't the exact same items and gearedto bemore inspirational), which honestly only furthers my point how weird some oldschoolers mindset is about this. Wasn't it originally about experimenting and blatantly being themselves why they and we dressed like that in the first place?
But at the same time I also remember this thread is heavily monitored by a certain discord which includes most of the people posted here, so there's that.

[Anonymous No.10538829]

>>10538825
Twinning takes two people and notone person and a 10yo picture of a girl you don't even know. Also kek what are you doing in this thread?

[Anonymous No.10538832]

>>10538828
god you're an idiot

[Anonymous No.10538845]

Why do people wk josine so much. She sold me multiple dresses with undisclosed stains, reeked to tell and back (sweaty armpit). She is absolutely disgusting. Had to dry clean multiple times to remove the disgusting smell. Now I just imagine how bad she smells when I see her coords

[Anonymous No.10538847]

>>10538789
I think it's just their lighting since all of their stock photos have this purpley/pink shine. I have it in natural black and it also had this tone in the pics, but irl it's black with a slightly brown tone when the light really hits it

[Anonymous No.10538855]

>>10538818
>obsess over a 10 yo picture of me
you wish

[Anonymous No.10538870]

>>10538845
just sounds like you got a vendetta and are trying to start rumors. post proof or gtfo.
the autism and salt about neo old schoolers itt is insane just wear the shit you like you crazed bitches who cares oh my god

[Anonymous No.10538872]

>>10538789
Do they ever even restock their wigs?

[Anonymous No.10538873]

>>10538828
You have issues. People wear lolita in their own ways, to enjoy it. If someone wants to copy a snap, literally who cares? You're projecting your own ideals of the fashion onto everyone else.
On top of that, when old schoolers do try something new, they get needled down as "not really oldschool!" or "neo-lolita" or whatever. Most of the people on this board are just looking for any excuse to be bitter, including yourself.

[Anonymous No.10538875]

>>10538845
> She sold me multiple dresses with undisclosed stains
Sounds like a you problem if you bought multiple dresses from her

[Anonymous No.10538879]

>>10538875
this just sounds stupid.

[Anonymous No.10538881]

>>10538845

Honestly my friend who bought an item also had the same issue. But I think her rabid wks discourage people from telling the truth desu.

>>10538875
She could have bought several at once.

[Anonymous No.10538888]

>>10538870
She only sells to her friends so I don't really want to out myself

>>10538875
Ok, it was one transaction, and why does it matter? Shouldn't people be aware before purchasing from her? She doesn't sell on LM so I can't really give public feedback

[Anonymous No.10538889]

>>10538799
>>10538809
No one's trying to stir up drama about J, you idiots. It's a trend amongst old schoolers that people are allowed to criticize.

[Anonymous No.10538890]

>>10538888
Not much of a friend if you’re trying to throw salt on her for no reason. Sounds fake.

[Anonymous No.10538892]

>>10538890
It's not for no reason?
Like I said, people deserve to know that she has done shitty stuff like that with her sales when there is no place to give her feedback publicly

yet all her wks are coming out of the woodworks, I swear she is a mod here or something

[Anonymous No.10538893]

>>10538845
I have a friend who bought a dress from her and it came with really bad BO too

[Anonymous No.10538896]

>>10538847
thank you!

[Anonymous No.10538908]

>>10538832
I see I hit a wound point, or what is that namecalling for?

>>10538855
Stop projecting and read the full sentence.

>>10538873
>You have issues
Why? Because I think cosplaying actual people down to everything is weird? The only one projecting is you anon, I was merely stating my opinion. Instead of the endless namecalling, name at least one proper argument against my or any of the points above.
Also
>People wear lolita in their own ways,
>If someone wants to copy a snap
Like dude look at your own statements.

[Anonymous No.10538912]

>>10538873
>On top of that, when old schoolers do try something new, they get needled down as "not really oldschool!" or "neo-lolita" or whatever.
Ah yes, don't try out anything new because others may not like it. Only dress for the opinion of others and copy others. Truly the essence of old school.

>>10538845
All her friends lurk here, of course they are going to shit up the thread with brainlessly whiteknighting everything she does.

[Anonymous No.10538925]

i don’t even like her that much but i don’t know why her collecting pieces and recreating a look seen on a magazine is such a big deal???

[Anonymous No.10538927]

>>10538925
It's not about HER specifically but about old schoolers who do this as a whole.

[Anonymous No.10538935]

>>10538927
people look at magazines for inspiration all the time? How is this even a problem

[Anonymous No.10538939]

>>10538925
Maybe scroll up then.

[Anonymous No.10538941]

>>10538935
Is this bait to get people to shit on josine more? Just read the thread jesus.

[Anonymous No.10538943]

>>10538941
been reading the thread, everyone's just going crazy about shit that doesn't matter. Dress however you want it really isn't that big of a deal.

[Anonymous No.10538950]

>>10538888
You are embarrassing

[Anonymous No.10538961]

>>10538943
>i-it doesn't matter anyway, s-stop critizising!
Why even post and pretending to try to understand.

[Anonymous No.10538963]

>>10538870
Kek no one even mentioned neo-oldschoolers. If you're triggered, you always have the option to leave and go back to your hugbox, neofag.

[Anonymous No.10538968]

I miss seeing ferro's coords.

[Anonymous No.10538969]

>>10538925
she also recreates and copies looks of normal modern lolitas too. not sure if she's come up with a decent coord of her own in a while. just weird.

[Anonymous No.10538978]

>>10538927
> not about her specifically
> entire thread full of wild rumors and personal attacks

Sure jan. Y'all are just wild. will not be surprised if this entire thread will get nuked soon

[Anonymous No.10538981]

>>10537799
>>10538870
>>10538873
Samefag

>>10538925
Probably because it's not simply taking inspiration and they aren't just "a girl in a magazine" but normal people. Dressing up as another person is pretty weird, including all the idolization of what's probably just teens and early adults hoping to get snapshotted into a magazine or meeting with their friends.

[Anonymous No.10538982]

>>10538978
t. seething whiteknight who probably spammed reports

[Anonymous No.10538984]

>>10538978
Lmao you do realize people only started talking about her after people like you started spamming your stupid ass "stop attacking J!!!" comments? You played yourself.

[Anonymous No.10539002]

>>10538981
you’re thinking way too deep about this, it’s just recreating the overall outfit. you have pieces that are like it, you can style it just like how they were featured in old magazines. criticize all you want but in reality it isn’t that weird or creepy as you think it is.

[Anonymous No.10539006]

>>10538666
Who?
>Nice trips btw.

[Anonymous No.10539015]

>>10539002
No, it's pretty weird and doesn't sit right. She didn't just have the pieces, she specifically searched for them to dress up like that person and pose like that person. If she just had like 3 same things it would be lame but at least you could still say it's inspired but she copied everything, not even just the outfit. Her "recreating" is just another way to say cosplaying. And I don't get the purpose other than "I completely cosplayed this normal person because I idolize them as some kind of old school stars because they happen to be in a picture of an old magazine". I think you're already too immensed in the "wow I want to be just like this old magazine picture!!" thinking, you lost the connection to the reality of those girls just being like any other person here but born a bit earlier in a different country. Or maybe you just don't want to think about or reflect on that a bit deeper because in reality that isn't as normal as you think it is.

[Anonymous No.10539020]

>>10539002
I dare you and all the other wks itt to pick pictures of other oldschoolers on instagram, fully (((recreate))) them down to the posing and styling and then post it to your social media.

[Anonymous No.10539023]

sex

[Anonymous No.10539024]

>>10538968
me too anon

[Anonymous No.10539027]

>>10539002
I dare you and all the other wks itt to pick pictures of other oldschoolers on instagram that you don't know, fully (((recreate))) them down to the posing and styling and then post it to your social media.

[Anonymous No.10539030]

>>10538968
I don't, lol.

[Anonymous No.10539040]

someone writing essays over here. i think you’re the only one that cares to this extent.
>>10539027
>>10538984
>>10538981
>>10538963
>>10538961
>>10538939
>>10538908
>>10538828
>>10538820
>>10539015

[Anonymous No.10539042]

>>10539023
I agree

[Anonymous No.10539048]

>>10539040
Multiple anons wrote those comments, dumbass.

[Anonymous No.10539049]

>>10539040
Two of those are mine. Learn to cope with different opinions and 4chan in general, deflecting samefag-chan.

[Anonymous No.10539053]

Oh yes, drama and old schoolers go together as well as tea and cake

[Anonymous No.10539056]

>>10539040
>everyone who disagrees with me is the same person
I'm still waiting on those arguments. Otherwise seconding >>10539027

[Anonymous No.10539113]

>>10538501
I think it's cute

[Anonymous No.10539115]

>>10538981

[Anonymous No.10539116]

>>10538912
>Ah yes, don't try out anything new because others may not like it.
Why does everyone on this website have such garbage reading comprehension?
>>10538908
People like to wear lolita in their own ways. If it happens to be copying a snap, who cares? If I saw someone copying an old outfit I wore a decade ago, I'd be really flattered. I'm sure the person she's copying would be too. Your only argument is that "I think this is weird" which is subjective. I disagree that it's weird, and I think you're over-reacting. Also, stop crying when someone insults you. This is 4chan.

[Anonymous No.10539155]

>>10539006
An older lolita who constantly harasses younger lolitas

[Anonymous No.10539161]

>>10539155
Josine is in her 30s

[Anonymous No.10539162]

>>10539053
This isn't drama, it's a spergfest

[Anonymous No.10539163]

>>10539161
>older lolita
Checks out.

[Anonymous No.10539224]

>>10539116
>People like to wear lolita in their own ways. If it happens to be copying a snap, who cares?
>wear lolita in their own ways
>by copying someone else head to toe
Repeating yourself won't make it any less contradictory.
>If I saw someone copying an old outfit I wore a decade ago, I'd be really flattered.
Why would you be flattered by some rando cosplaying as you and posing as you?
>I'm sure the person she's copying would be too
I doubt it, they shit-talked gaijins and called even foreign brand models ugly in the early 00s, they'd probably cringe.
>Your only argument is that "I think this is weird"
Besides refuting points that are made and then getting no real reply to that, my argument is that it's weird because they glorify completely normal people they don't even know and treat a picture of them taken on a street like some kind of movie star/character poster, to the point they are cosplaying as them or defend and cheer on the cosplay. You know this would end in an awkward shitfest if she pulled it on a western lolita.
>Also, stop crying when someone insults you. This is 4chan
And 4chan is also a place for discussion. No one is crying but the one lashing out as a way to avoid addressing what is said.

[Anonymous No.10539294]

Oh my god who the fuck cares if Josine or whoever else decides to copy snaps if it's fun then do it i guess there's weirder shit than that The good old "if i make a momoko coord is it considered cosplay" dilemma i guess. stop being autistic about it and try to have fun yourself for once in your life instead of sperging about decades old ruffly clothes on a basket weaving vietnamese image board

[Anonymous No.10539441]

>>10539294
nooo anon it's different because momoko is a character played by a celebrity not just a "completely normal person with a normal life" therefore you can't make that argument!! it's still super weird to them i guess.

[Anonymous No.10539541]

ngl i don't even care about j but her wks that instantly pop up and defend her honor whenever someone dares to mutter a negative word about her are hilarious. please bring her up more often gulls

[Anonymous No.10539546]

>>10539441
lol it is different tho

[Anonymous No.10539552]

>>10539546
Yeah? Do you think momoko is real anon? Do you?

[Anonymous No.10539554]

>>10539552
are you literally retarded
she's a fictional character not a real person

[Anonymous No.10539556]

>>10539554
>mfw oldschoolers can't even tell that apart anymore

[Anonymous No.10539565]

>>10539541
Yes, bring her up more so the thread gets deleted. Great idea, retard.

[Anonymous No.10539574]

>>10537799
>>10538870
>>10538873
>>10539040
>>10539115
>>10539116
>>10539294
Samefag

[Anonymous No.10539592]

>>10539565
>noooo stop talking about her or i'll call the jannies sniff sniff!!
hilarious

[Anonymous No.10539624]

>>10539574
ok keep telling yourself that spergchan

[Anonymous No.10539626]

>>10538666

Maried dauphine? That's the only MD I know.

[Anonymous No.10539630]

>>10539624
Kek I, too, use more than one device

[Anonymous No.10539670]

>>10533590
https://discord.gg/jGxyKVvT

[Anonymous No.10539692]

>>10539670
What is this

[Anonymous No.10539732]

>>10539224
How is copying someone's outfit glorifying them? You're reaching.

[Anonymous No.10539757]

>>10538501 all i have to say is that it would look nicer with otks and slightly shorter bloomers so the dress doesn't appear quite so short

[Anonymous No.10539805]

>>10539624
Bitch you did exactly the same thing

[Anonymous No.10539829]

>>10539541
why doesn't this bitch have a thread on the farms yet? seems milky.

[Anonymous No.10539855]

>>10539732
You're just acting dense on purpose at this point. It's explained in the very same post how.

[Anonymous No.10539928]

>>10539855
the magazine glorified them by including their coord in the publication

[Anonymous No.10539933]

>>10539928
The magazine didn't cosplay as them

[Anonymous No.10539940]

Holy shit is this what qualifies for drama nowadays?

[Anonymous No.10539941]

[Anonymous No.10539942]

[Anonymous No.10539943]

[Anonymous No.10539944]

>>10539940
Well, DDZ has her own drama with wearing nazi uniforms. Neorococomemes is sharing all receipts.

[Anonymous No.10539947]

>>10539940
>posts a cow
Kek. But this looks like shit and isn't even old school.

[Anonymous No.10539950]

>>10539943

[Anonymous No.10539959]

>>10539950

[Anonymous No.10539960]

>>10539950
adorable

[Anonymous No.10539961]

>>10539959

[Anonymous No.10539968]

>>10539961
>>10539959
>>10539950
nice try vendettachan

[Anonymous No.10540010]

>>10539015
Cosplaying a character is about the character, it would be weird for someone to cosplay you. But this isn’t cosplay because it isn’t about the girl, it’s about her clothes, if we want to reach a bit, it may be about old street snaps. No one is obsessing about the girl in the picture, they are only interested on their clothes and obsessing about clothes is typical lolita behavior.

[Anonymous No.10540018]

>>10540010
this was already pointed out to them, keep up. >>10538603

[Anonymous No.10540111]

>>10539829
Because someone being white knighted doesn’t warrant a thread newfag

[Anonymous No.10542901]

I think O has autism

[Anonymous No.10542973]

>>10542901
Literally all the oldschoolers do. Nice bait tho.

[Anonymous No.10542975]

>>10542973
She obviously has a special interest

[Anonymous No.10542976]

>>10542975
old school is a special interest.

[Anonymous No.10543072]

>>10542901
All lolitas are mentally retarded to dress that way.

[Anonymous No.10543241]

>>10542901
i don't think it is autism, she seems mentally disabled almost.

[Anonymous No.10543247]

>>10539940
This get ugly hag out of here

[Anonymous No.10543692]

>>10533590

Some time ago I saw on instagram an old school lolita that made some beautiful headband headdresses with vintage-looking lace, with a bit of a description. I really wanted to copy it but I can't find the posts :( Does anyone recognize/had saved this specific post? I was really looking forward to making some :(

[Anonymous No.10543705]

Does anyone know where to find a nice cotton long sleeve blouse with shirring on the sleeves? I’ve been stalking the Japanese sites for a few days and they seem pretty hard to come by/get snatched up instantly. I got a bodyline one and a mistake was made lol

[Anonymous No.10543741]

>>10543692
Have you tried looking at your mom's place?

[Anonymous No.10543814]

>>10539940
DD stop self posting, nobody is talking about you anymore

[Anonymous No.10543822]

>>10543692 were they on actual hairbands? Tied on by ribbons?

They really aren't too hard to make though, as long as you have nice lace they usually turn out pretty well

[Anonymous No.10543886]

>>10543822
They looked very sturdy but looked like the lace was simply glued onto the hairband? It had no ribbons or anything, they were super simple and good for casual.

[Anonymous No.10543918]

>>10543886 i have quite a few headdresses saved but all i have that kinda matches the description you gave are these ones

[Anonymous No.10543920]

>>10543918 most people seem to go for ribbons on their headdresses. Hope that helped

[Anonymous No.10544064]

>>10543918
>>10543920
Thank you so much, kind anon! These are exactly what I've been looking for!

[Anonymous No.10545551]

>>10544064 np, their ig is morelkor if you want to look up the original post

[Anonymous No.10545966]

does anybody have this image with the japanese text? i really wanna know if she actually said "cutting myself" or if it was some kind of weird joke lost in translation

[Anonymous No.10545986]

>>10545966
could be both, in the sense that saying you're cutting yourself could have been edgelord humor in that time.

[Anonymous No.10545992]

[Anonymous No.10545995]

>>10545992

[Anonymous No.10545999]

>>10545995

[Anonymous No.10546000]

>>10545999

[Anonymous No.10546002]

>>10546000

[Anonymous No.10546003]

>>10546002

[Anonymous No.10546006]

>>10546003

[Anonymous No.10546007]

Anyone have an unedited / higher quality version of this pic?

[Anonymous No.10546067]

>>10545986
Lolitas at the time loved announcing crazy shit to shock normal people.

[Anonymous No.10546365]

[Anonymous No.10546368]

[Anonymous No.10546906]

Requesting a dump of coords with red tartan. I got a new pieces and would like some inspo that arent just cookie cutter tartan-dress-coorded-with-white.

[Anonymous No.10546911]

>>10546906
A bunch of tartan coords were just dumped in the good coords thread if that helps
>>10544684
>>10544686
>>10544674
>>10540750
for example

[Anonymous No.10546926]

Thanks for being mature adults, oldschoolers. Way to keep the spirit alive. Now the rest of the lolita community is loling at all of you, and I'm ashamed to call myself an oldschooler and so put myself among you lot. Grow tf up.

Or, go be salty with the rest of your fellow Russians in the airless, drab, colorless room you all call an "office space." Gtfo of oldschool. Post more coords/snaps and stfu.

[Anonymous No.10547192]

>>10546926
>Or, go be salty with the rest of your fellow Russians in the airless, drab, colorless room you all call an "office space."

literally what

[Anonymous No.10547317]

Can someone link a good summary of the history of lolita fashion? Specifically looking for a focus on oldschool and proto lolita.

[Anonymous No.10547319]

[Anonymous No.10547320]

>>10547319

[Anonymous No.10547323]

>>10547320

[Anonymous No.10547324]

>>10547323

[Anonymous No.10547327]

>>10547324

[Anonymous No.10547328]

>>10547327

[Anonymous No.10547360]

>>10547328

[Anonymous No.10547365]

>>10547319
>>10547320
>>10547323
>>10547324
>>10547327
>>10547328
>>10547360
one of these things is not like the others

[Anonymous No.10547371]

>>10547360

[Anonymous No.10547373]

>>10547371


>>10547360
I'm trying to dump some pics from a small oldschool lolita coord folder I have, I found this on tumblr

[Anonymous No.10547378]

>>10547373

[Anonymous No.10547381]

>>10547378

[Anonymous No.10547385]

>>10547381

[Anonymous No.10547389]

>>10547385

[Anonymous No.10547392]

>>10547389

[Anonymous No.10547394]

>>10547392

[Anonymous No.10547396]

>>10547394

[Anonymous No.10547399]

>>10547396

[Anonymous No.10547402]

>>10547399

[Anonymous No.10547403]

>>10547402

[Anonymous No.10547405]

[Anonymous No.10547406]

>>10547403

[Anonymous No.10547408]

[Anonymous No.10547411]

>>10547406

[Anonymous No.10547414]

[Anonymous No.10547415]

>>10547411

[Anonymous No.10547416]

>>10547415

[Anonymous No.10547417]

[Anonymous No.10547419]

>>10547416
does anyone know what her blog was? I remember she had a website where she posted her wardrobe and her coords

[Anonymous No.10547420]

[Anonymous No.10547421]

>>10547419

[Anonymous No.10547422]

>>10547421

[Anonymous No.10547423]

[Anonymous No.10547425]

[Anonymous No.10547426]

>>10547422

[Anonymous No.10547428]

Do you wear other lolita substyles or do you stick to old school only

[Anonymous No.10547433]

>>10547426

[Anonymous No.10547442]

>>10547433

[Anonymous No.10547444]

>>10547442

[Anonymous No.10547449]

>>10547444

[Anonymous No.10547461]

>>10547428
I wear gothic and oldschool mostly

[Anonymous No.10547518]

>>10547449

[Anonymous No.10547522]

>>10547518

[Anonymous No.10547525]

>>10547522

[Anonymous No.10547527]

>>10547428
i wear old school in mostly darker colors but sometimes i get the urge to wear the sweetest of sweet prints with a bunch of sickenly cute accessories and thus, do so. Both are fun.

[Anonymous No.10547529]

>>10547525
this is more gothic than oldschool

[Anonymous No.10547532]

>>10547529
This is not old school, dumbass

[Anonymous No.10547535]

>>10547529

[Anonymous No.10547536]

>>10547535

[Anonymous No.10547541]

>>10547536

[Anonymous No.10547546]

>>10547541

[Anonymous No.10547549]

>>10547546
dropped pic

[Anonymous No.10547551]

>>10547549

[Anonymous No.10547555]

>>10547551

[Anonymous No.10547557]

>>10547555

[Anonymous No.10547558]

>>10547557

[Anonymous No.10550897]

>>10539115
did you edit out the other 4 because they were you?

[Anonymous No.10550901]

>>10539630
that's some next level autism. Are you really sitting on here on an ipad, laptop and your phone salt-chan?