Daily-egl / Cof Thread

[Anonymous No.10397003]

Dump whatever you want from the groups. I'll dump the latest daily egl since I'm not in cof anymore.

[Anonymous No.10397004]

[Anonymous No.10397005]

[Anonymous No.10397006]

[Anonymous No.10397007]

[Anonymous No.10397008]

[Anonymous No.10397009]

[Anonymous No.10397010]

[Anonymous No.10397011]

[Anonymous No.10397012]

[Anonymous No.10397013]

End for now

[Anonymous No.10397077]

[Anonymous No.10397079]

>>10397077

[Anonymous No.10397080]

>>10397079

[Anonymous No.10397081]

>>10397080

[Anonymous No.10397082]

>>10397081

[Anonymous No.10397084]

>>10397082

[Anonymous No.10397085]

>>10397005
I get viscerally angry when I remember that most of her coords use her natural hair. I can’t make my hair look halfway decent and she’s out her convincing people she grew her own wig (yes I know this particular look includes some clip ins... still)

[Anonymous No.10397087]

>>10397011
Why did she photoshop herself in front of the st louis botanical gardens

[Anonymous No.10397101]

>>10397087
to be reminicent of old school edits

[Anonymous No.10397104]

>>10397101
I... I mean I guess

[Anonymous No.10397107]

>>10397084
What wig is that?

[Anonymous No.10397111]

>>10397011
god, this just looks as though she ticked off some kind of neo old school trend checklist

[Anonymous No.10397125]

>>10397107
It's probably one of those Maple wigs.

[Anonymous No.10397130]

>>10397085
She actually said this was a Lockshop wig on her Insta

[Anonymous No.10397134]

>>10397079
This girl is adorable but her coords somehow always look cheap

[Anonymous No.10397136]

>>10397134
Pretty sure everything in this coord other than the main piece is cheap AliExpress garbage. She has so much potential, I wish she would get some nicer items.

[Anonymous No.10397154]

>>10397085
Didn't she say it's a wig and she put her real hair with it in the twintails?
Haven't seen her using only her real hair recently

[Anonymous No.10397158]

>>10397154
She has a tutorial up on YouTube for her pigtails. If you see her in just pigtails that’s her real hair

[Anonymous No.10397161]

>>10397154
The front bangs and side pieces are her hair. She has partial wigs for volume clipped on the twintails. At least that’s what I fathom since the from half looks exactly like her hair

[Anonymous No.10397162]

>>10397134
She just likes simple coords, there are nothing cheap about that. I like her style a lot.

[Anonymous No.10397167]

>>10397134
She just likes simple coords, there is nothing cheap about that. I really like her style.

[Anonymous No.10397171]

>>10397167
NTA but I love simple coords and something about that coord does look really cheap. I can’t exactly say what though

[Anonymous No.10397185]

>>10397171
might be those striped 10 dollar socks and the garter wristbands

[Anonymous No.10397209]

>>10397185
Nayrt but I sense vendetta

[Anonymous No.10397210]

>>10397185
The wristbands are what was getting me. Thank you,

[Anonymous No.10397211]

>>10397077
Did this girl mention an IG?

[Anonymous No.10397212]

>>10397087
Maybe she misses going there, corona got us all reminiscent and shit

[Anonymous No.10397214]

>>10397210
Their handmade is p good imo

[Anonymous No.10397217]

>>10397214
The cuffs themselves aren’t wide enough and they look really off in the photo

[Anonymous No.10397221]

>>10397171
I can’t see the blouse and accessories very well but those socks and shoes scream Aliexpress.

[Anonymous No.10397224]

>>10397217
Another anon. What do you mean by wide? They look very “full” to me if that makes sense, are you talking about the lace width?

[Anonymous No.10397295]

>>10397211
She's @wolfling.s

[Anonymous No.10397301]

>>10397224
Yes, I am talking about the width. Most wrist cuffs are, well, cuffs. The lace she’s used is not very wide and it’s cinched in the exact middle so it just looks like a weird lace bracelet. Or if you are being mean a garter belt.

[Anonymous No.10397330]

>>10397295
Thank you!

[Anonymous No.10397365]

>>10397301
anon, that's because it's not on a mannequin. the elastic is bunched up. it isn't even cinched in the middle either, there's clearly a ribbon channel 1/4th of the way down. also i think you mean length, not width. there's no particular length that wristcuffs are, they are sometimes fluffy bracelets and sometimes longer, sometimes they are even just standard shirt cuffs with lace.

[Anonymous No.10397661]

>>10397365
NAYRT but I agree with them, the lace length and size looks awful on the homemade ones

[Anonymous No.10397971]

>>10397661
Nayrt but there is no standard wristcuff length. Some of them are shorter and some are longer.

[Anonymous No.10397973]

>>10397971

[Anonymous No.10397974]

>>10397973

[Anonymous No.10397975]

>>10397081
What is with the weird headdress?

[Anonymous No.10397977]

>>10397081
This is so retarded looking

[Anonymous No.10397984]

>>10397003
This is gorgeous. The crown is a bit much but overall I love this coord to pieces.

[Anonymous No.10398006]

what about posting from Daily Coordinates?

[Anonymous No.10398007]

>>10397984
You have ita taste. Girl has never looked good in her life.

[Anonymous No.10398111]

>>10397080
Why the FUCK would you choose not to tie your rectangle headdress? Yes I'm mad

[Anonymous No.10398113]

>>10397081
is she jewish? i always wondered

[Anonymous No.10398127]

>>10397974
>>10397973
>>10397971
All of these are longer than hers and have the elastic toward one end, not dead in the middle.

[Anonymous No.10398128]

>>10398007
NTA I don’t know who she is, but with a more tasteful head piece it would be cute. Devendetta your vag

[Anonymous No.10398139]

Daily-egl dump

[Anonymous No.10398140]

[Anonymous No.10398141]

[Anonymous No.10398142]

[Anonymous No.10398143]

That's all there is new

[Anonymous No.10398180]

>>10398127
Like other anon said >>10397214 ‘s elastic is obviously not in the middle, it’s more like at 1/4. >>10397973 ‘s elastic is in the middle and >>10397974 looks way shorter. Are you a roleplayer?

[Anonymous No.10398202]

>>10398180
No, i just think her wristcuffs look cheap and ugly. Why are you so invested in proving they aren’t? Her whole coord beyond the dress looks like it cost $12

[Anonymous No.10398209]

>>10398202
I have no idea about the girl or her coord but you sound like you don’t know shit about lolita at all.

[Anonymous No.10398212]

>>10397984
That girl consistantly fails at ott. This is no exception.

[Anonymous No.10398243]

>>10398202
nta but no one is trying to prove that, your initial issue was their width or whatever ESL shit you decided on. just say that you think they're shit to begin with. no need to pretend you know anything. but you not liking them doesn't mean they were made bad or are too short.

[Anonymous No.10398249]

>>10398006
Why don't you do it, anon? I'm sure no one would complain

[Anonymous No.10398450]

>>10398212
She always misses the mark. And now she’s got a blog like she’s some authority on OTT lolita when she’s barely been in the fashion for like a year and a half

[Anonymous No.10398481]

>>10398212
I think the OP look is one of her best, so I was happy for her, but then I see this lipstick choice >>10397013 and wonder if there's any point commenting positive/negative crit on her pictures. kind of like that moitie porch-chan, just as I think she's improving she does some dumb thing again. can't teach taste.

[Anonymous No.10398487]

>>10398450
I don't really mind newbies starting blogs because I like that blogs are having a revival, but she really seems to be acting like some authority on lolita which rubs me the wrong way.

[Anonymous No.10398497]

>>10397011
I really love these edits & the coord itself is really cute.
>>10397080
I gotta agree that her not tying the headpiece is a little bit odd. That dress is really pretty, though.
>>10397077
her hair is awesome.

[Anonymous No.10398531]

>>10398487
Are blogs having a revival? Are they in the blog carnival so I can find them?

[Anonymous No.10398564]

>>10397185
What brands sell striped tights (not socks)?

[Anonymous No.10398578]

>>10398139
>>10398140
>>10398141
>>10398142
>>10398143
I wonder how many of these girls know their in a group run by an ita thread starting seagull-chan?

[Anonymous No.10398588]

>>10398578
Who cares, she barely even posts in the group anyways. A lot of people are just tired of CoF probably.

[Anonymous No.10398700]

>>10398588
Of course she barely posts, she's practically not even a real lolita. She's there to lurk.

[Anonymous No.10398734]

>>10398578
Anything is better than cof

[Anonymous No.10398826]

>>10397082
Honestly I am so jelly of her! Every piece I see her wear I suddenly need to have!


>>10398142
why is she standing on a meta bag??????

>>10398564
I dont think you need to go to a brand, your nearest costume store or amazon will def have some.
but mate, they are ugly af . . .

[Anonymous No.10398831]

>>10398826
I don’t understand what you mean. Striped legwear is a lolita staple and my legs don’t work well with socks.

[Anonymous No.10398844]

>>10398826
To keep her floor clean, probably. You’ve never seen people put their shoes in plastic bags indoors?

[Anonymous No.10398845]

>>10398826
To keep her floor clean, probably. You’ve never seen people put their shoes on plastic bags indoors?

[Anonymous No.10398881]

[Anonymous No.10398882]

>>10398881

[Anonymous No.10398883]

>>10398882

[Anonymous No.10398884]

>>10398883

[Anonymous No.10398885]

>>10398884

[Anonymous No.10398887]

>>10398885

[Anonymous No.10398888]

>>10398887

[Anonymous No.10398890]

[Anonymous No.10398896]

>>10398006
there's no actual rule go ahead, the more actual pics the better

[Anonymous No.10398924]

>>10398826
>they are ugly af
Well if you're buying them from a costume shop then yeah, they will be.

[Anonymous No.10399014]

>>10398883
i usually like peeking bloomers but something about how short this is makes the bloomers look diaper-y.

[Anonymous No.10399017]

>>10398140
She is dressed like my late grandmother on the right though she would never have an fur stole butts facing those she is talking too.

[Anonymous No.10399018]

>>10398890
and this, kids, is why we don't collage low-light pictures right next to ones with beauty filters all over the face.

[Anonymous No.10399098]

>>10398831
I think anon meant you can get striped tights anywhere online or any store

[Anonymous No.10399122]

>>10398826
You shouldn't, she only jumped on the bandwagon last year and everything she owns/wears is from then.

[Anonymous No.10399258]

>>10398882
Did anyone else see the google doc about this chick’s antics? She’s fucked

[Anonymous No.10399261]

>>10399258
Deets?

[Anonymous No.10399263]

>>10399261
lolcow

[Anonymous No.10399264]

>>10399261
It’s a long doc but tldr she’s a pathological liar who has lied about her name, age, being trans, being an immigrant etc, lied about being abused, steals peoples coord ideas, used other people for clout, etc etc

I believe the owner of the doc made it private temporarily because its not accessible atm

[Anonymous No.10399270]

>>10399264
Thank you anon, I’m not on lolcow and def missing the good stuff

[Anonymous No.10399417]

>>10398831
>>Lolita staple
Maybe for clown lolita, but desu horizontal striped legwear just looks ridiculous

[Anonymous No.10399422]

>>10399264
Lol are you the girl who was butthurt that she didn’t win the coord contest at AWA?

It’s really bizarre to edit people out of photos and then gloat about it. It you stop being friends with someone, the normal thing to do is to just stop talking to them

[Anonymous No.10399429]

>>10399417
Pick up some GLBs.

[Anonymous No.10399430]

>>10399417
Please stop posting if you're this new

[Anonymous No.10399432]

>>10399264
Just like Hera then lol. They were both made for eachother. The who doc reads like her pointing fingers to distract from her own lying and attention whoring.

[Anonymous No.10399446]

>>10399122
Brand or not, the look is stupid and reminiscent of clownlita or emo stuff.
It can only look good when its coorded with purpose.

[Anonymous No.10399449]

>>10399429
ntayrt but guys fashion is ever changing. Saying that nowadays its like telling people to check out some old vogue magazines in order to support your outdated aesthetic values.

[Anonymous No.10399451]

>>10399449
Lolita is not fast fashion. Seriously you need to stop posting

[Anonymous No.10399457]

>>10399449
Japanese brands still produce striped socks, particularly Meta. I don’t like them either but saying they’re not lolita is objectively wrong.

[Anonymous No.10399459]

>>10399457
lol never said its not lolita just that they are ugly and kinda outdated.
They mostly work for sailor stuff, hence the meta ones.

>>10399451
never said lotita is the same a fast fashion, i was just making an analogy. Lets be real, things go out of style, even in lolita.

also its kinda my opinion so dont freak out

[Anonymous No.10399466]

>>10399459
Not the other anon but Meta isn’t outdated. They’re being pretty competent lately unlike you, queen of shitty opinions. You literally just said telling you to look in GLB was like looking at a dated vogue. GLB is not dated. It only stopped printing a few years ago. Get your head out of your ass.

[Anonymous No.10399469]

>>10399466
JESUS read what I am writing dude.
Never said that meta is outdated, I fucking love meta. I just said that meta makes the striped socks for sailor stuff (which is one of their strong suits)

[Anonymous No.10399470]

>>10399466
>being pretty competent lately
lol why the sudden swipe at meta? what did they ever do to you?

[Anonymous No.10399477]

>>10399466
Why so serious?

[Anonymous No.10399624]

>>10398882
When will she stop using those ugly ass shoes

[Anonymous No.10399627]

>>10399624
I'm convinced they're the only shoes she owns at this point

[Anonymous No.10399629]

>>10399430
>>10399429
>>10399457
GLB includes Gothic fashion too. And brands produce non lolita items either. So your arguments are pretty weak.

Also I never said that they don't belong to lolita, but saying it is a staple item is simply wrong. Maybe in the 2000s, but thats very outdated. And desu I have only seen bad ita coords with white/random colour socks while being in the fashion for 6 years (ok, maybe they work for punk, but that is not a very common substyle)
But calling people 'new' when they have not your opininion makes it easier of course.

[Anonymous No.10399633]

>>10399629
You are aware that oldschool exists, right?

[Anonymous No.10399634]

Starting a CoF dump of the 40 newest coords, sorry if I repeat any Daily-EGL ones.

[Anonymous No.10399635]

>>10399634

[Anonymous No.10399638]

>>10399633
Don't see much striped socks in revived oldschool either

[Anonymous No.10399639]

>>10399635

[Anonymous No.10399641]

>>10399639

[Anonymous No.10399642]

>>10399641

[Anonymous No.10399643]

>>10399642

[Anonymous No.10399644]

>>10399638
you living under a rock?

[Anonymous No.10399645]

>>10399643

[Anonymous No.10399646]

>>10399645

[Anonymous No.10399647]

>>10399644
You living in the past? Checking coords here and on insta regularly, can't find many examples.

[Anonymous No.10399648]

>>10399639
I can't put my finger on it but the proportions in this coord are so odd

[Anonymous No.10399649]

>>10399646

[Anonymous No.10399650]

>>10399649

[Anonymous No.10399652]

>>10399650

[Anonymous No.10399653]

>>10399652

[Anonymous No.10399655]

>>10399653

[Anonymous No.10399657]

>>10399655

[Anonymous No.10399661]

>>10399657

[Anonymous No.10399663]

>>10399661

[Anonymous No.10399666]

>>10399663

[Anonymous No.10399670]

>>10399666

[Anonymous No.10399671]

>>10399663
Girl please die
>t

[Anonymous No.10399676]

>>10399670

[Anonymous No.10399677]

>>10399657
This looks like a costume not a coordinate.

[Anonymous No.10399678]

>>10399676

[Anonymous No.10399681]

>>10399678

[Anonymous No.10399682]

>>10399681

[Anonymous No.10399683]

>>10399682

[Anonymous No.10399685]

>>10399683

[Anonymous No.10399686]

>>10399685

[Anonymous No.10399687]

>>10399686

[Anonymous No.10399690]

>>10399687

[Anonymous No.10399693]

>>10399690

[Anonymous No.10399696]

>>10399693

[Anonymous No.10399698]

>>10399696

[Anonymous No.10399701]

>>10399698

[Anonymous No.10399704]

>>10399701

[Anonymous No.10399707]

>>10399704

[Anonymous No.10399712]

>>10399707

[Anonymous No.10399716]

>>10399712

[Anonymous No.10399719]

>>10399716

[Anonymous No.10399720]

>>10399719

[Anonymous No.10399722]

>>10399720

[Anonymous No.10399723]

>>10399722

[Anonymous No.10399724]

>>10399723
end

[Anonymous No.10399728]

>>10399638
The point is it doesn’t need to be “revived” because lolita is not fast fashion.

[Anonymous No.10399730]

>>10399704
Cute

>>10399720
Why do lolitas seem to have such poor taste in bags?

[Anonymous No.10399732]

>>10399685
This is a nice idea. I'd like to see more people "twinning" the same print but with different styles/colourways. Kills the actual "twinning" aspect of it but yk.

[Anonymous No.10399735]

>>10399728
Lolita still has trends and oldschool was very unpopular for a long time. This has nothing to do with fast fashion anon, as already stated in the comments above.

[Anonymous No.10399742]

>>10399720
Does anyone know who she is? I love this

[Anonymous No.10399800]

>>10397013
i really like this coord, but wow what a bad choice of lipstick

[Anonymous No.10399813]

Weekly weekend dressing up! This was my first twinning and it was so much fun definitely wanna do this again she asked me last minute if she can do it as a fury and here we go XD I love the results and her fury is so cute *_*


....Y'all mind if I just throw on my half assed fur suite real quick before we take the photo? Cool, thanks.
I also can't stop laughing.

[Anonymous No.10399821]

>>10399813
Fucking disgusting

[Anonymous No.10399823]

You have GOT to be kidding me.

[Anonymous No.10399830]

>>10399813
I find it really funny when lolitas go apeshit over a furry wearing lolita and call it disgusting and fetish-y. Its practically the same thing as a normie calling you an ageplayer wearing a little-girls dress and refusing to acknowledge you trying to educate them because SURELY a fashion called 'lolita' HAS to be a fetish. This is what you sound like to furrys.

[Anonymous No.10399833]

>>10399830

Ok, girl-who-is-obviously-the-one-on-the-right, why can't you just wear the fashion. WHY?! WHY!??

[Anonymous No.10399835]

>>10399833
not her at all, i don't even own a fursuit i just see through the hypocrisy of a very misunderstood subculture bashing another very misunderstood subculture

[Anonymous No.10399839]

>>10399835

Ok, girl-who-is-replying-to-all-the-negative-comments-in-CoF, answer my question. Why must you demand extra EXTRA attention when you're already dressing up like a toddler? Why can't you just wear the fashion. WHY?! WHY!??

[Anonymous No.10399841]

>>10399839
also non of the commenters, i'm not involved with the furry community at all, i occasionally look at the furry threads that pop up here and think the anime style suits are cute but thats about it. I like how you admit that lolita looks like toddler fashion though anon, I bet you wear exclusively sweet. Us goths don't have that problem.

[Anonymous No.10399842]

>>10399835
>hypocrisy of a very misunderstood subculture bashing another very misunderstood subculture

Then why must you mix them together.

[Anonymous No.10399847]

>>10399813

Literally all I could think of was this ancient meme that popped into my head.

[Anonymous No.10399848]

>>10399813
apparently it's not a sex thing and honestly I wouldn't even care, it just looks so fucking stupid

[Anonymous No.10399854]

>>10399723
dude's shoe game really improved

[Anonymous No.10399858]

>>10399417
take a look in the casual thread. i think they're a staple for casual look, and right now with social media OTT is king, so we don't see much of them. for OTT, people want matching print socks or lacey socks; and for the retro trend and spring/summer trend ankle socks over tights are big.

[Anonymous No.10399880]

>>10399858
They are a staple for oldschool, sailor, casual and punk and they appear in other substyles too (maybe except classic) so save your breath I think that anon is either new or just a little thick.

[Anonymous No.10399884]

>>10399678
She looks too old to be wearing a dress like that.

[Anonymous No.10399891]

>>10399884
No, she doesn't, fuck off age police we wear what we like regardless of age here.

[Anonymous No.10399893]

>>10399884
Fuck off scrote

[Anonymous No.10399914]

>>10399884
It's funny because she's not only not old, she's wearing one of the least lolita-looking lolita releases out there. You could see it on a 42 year old overweight rockabilly in any state in the US.

[Anonymous No.10399920]

>>10399884
Fuck off

[Anonymous No.10399980]

>>10399884
I mean first of all she looks like she's in her 20s so that's not even old?? wtf

[Anonymous No.10399995]

>>10399858
>>10399880
Nope they are not. They are used but not that regularly to call them a 'staple'. And at least red/white legwear looks always ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.10400002]

>>10399880
>>10399858
Red/white stripes still look ridiculous. And I always have to think of them when hearing striped legwear.

[Anonymous No.10400030]

>>10397209
i don't have a vendetta, some coords just look tacky; if she would have worn some decent socks and wristcuffs i wouldn't have commented on it lol

[Anonymous No.10400037]

>>10399644
if you're not going to post examples then shut up

[Anonymous No.10400119]

>>10400030
Nayrt but there is nothing inherently wrong with her socks or wristcuffs, maybe you just don’t like them together and that’s okay but your wording comes off vendetta-ey.

[Anonymous No.10400230]

>>10400119
ntayrt, honestly its not a great , I think it looks slightly directionless. Is it gothic?
Is it casual? Is it Pirate?
I kinda blame the socks, they are something that will draw the eye immediately.
They are too 'loud' for a casual coord.
Even just black socks balance the whole thing immediately.

[Anonymous No.10400238]

>>10399742
Saija Sasetar, I think

[Anonymous No.10400241]

>>10399264
The owner is fixing it I believe since people complained it was too long and the photos are hard to read (it was perfectly fine on a laptop though)

What bothers me is that she doesn’t care about moitie she just buys shit to rub in her “friends” faces and then just resells as soon as she gets her basic ass brag pics.

[Anonymous No.10400250]

>>10400230
Not liking the socks *in this coord* is a legit crit but that’s not because there is anything wrong with socks themselves. Original comments come off weirdly nitpicky/vendetta because of the way they are worded.

[Anonymous No.10400945]

>>10400119
you're really here nitpicking my choice of words? sorry that my opinion of accessories hurts your feelings, apparently we all have to play nice and word everything so that no one is offended

[Anonymous No.10400973]

>>10399643
Holy fuck this is sad. Clearly copied hellomermaids coord but worse

[Anonymous No.10400975]

>>10400230
This looks a million times better

[Anonymous No.10401116]

>>10400973
Robin did it so nicely too and the Kira Imai print was such a cute detail. She has a stronger sense of styling for concepts in general

[Anonymous No.10401119]

>>10400975
I disagree. It’s too bottom heavy, needs some white around the legs to balance it.

[Anonymous No.10401120]

[Anonymous No.10401152]

>>10399682
All her coordinates look the same and I'm sick of seeing them

[Anonymous No.10401158]

>>10400973
I think its sad mermaid tail lolita is a thing. I wonder why people think this fashion is a costume . . .

[Anonymous No.10401159]

>>10401158
wait I had more to say, even if you wanted to categorise it with OTT its still stupid. Why would a mermaid wear a dress??

[Anonymous No.10401162]

>>10401152
Me too anon I hate seeing cute lolitas in wearable outfits

[Anonymous No.10401164]

>>10400973
Mermaid lolita looks like shit

[Anonymous No.10401192]

>>10401162
kek

[Anonymous No.10401197]

>>10401152
There’s nothing wrong with having a consistent style

[Anonymous No.10401312]

>>10401158
>>10401164
its not even a wearable thing like you wouldn't show up to a meet wearing mermaid tail. its cringe.

[Anonymous No.10401353]

>>10400945
No one is offended you walnut we are just trying to explain why you come off retarded but I guess you are actually retarded and there isn’t much you can do about it

[Anonymous No.10401361]

>>10399716
I think her coords can’t get worse, but somehow they always do.

[Anonymous No.10401648]

Here's the dump anon couldn't be bothered to post

[Anonymous No.10401649]

>>10401648

[Anonymous No.10401651]

>>10401649

[Anonymous No.10401652]

>>10401651

[Anonymous No.10401654]

>>10401652

[Anonymous No.10401657]

>>10401654
I'm fond of the quarantine room-wear trend going on right now. It's nice to see, and looks better than a meet up style coord with no make-up and slippers.

[Anonymous No.10401658]

>>10401657

[Anonymous No.10401659]

>>10401658

[Anonymous No.10401935]

>>10401312
Exactly, it looks cute as a concept but I can't imagine an execution irl that would make it look decent

[Anonymous No.10401950]

>>10401935
I think there is a good way of doing it wright!
Mermaid lolita (as a concept for photos ect) could work if you didn't wear a dress, use a top & accessories and photograph it in an artistic way.
Simple coord pics in your living room dont work for a coord like that
see pics of inspiration on frilling up a mermaid

[Anonymous No.10401964]

>>10400973
She actually shared the idea of wanting to do this on discord well before hellomermaid did it, she didnt copy her, she just didnt have a tail yet to do it

[Anonymous No.10401968]

>>10401950
yeah but it's not really lolita, that's just a fancy mermaid no?

[Anonymous No.10401973]

>>10401968
I think you can take inspo from something like that and translate it into a lolita look

[Anonymous No.10402049]

>>10401973
I've seen some coords that look OK but all without the costumey tails.

[Anonymous No.10402053]

>>10401950
I like the concept, but without the silhouette would it really be read as Lolita?

[Anonymous No.10402062]

>>10401116
No she didn't. Hers was cringy too

[Anonymous No.10402071]

>>10402053
>>10401158
>>10401312
It's just combining two interests...they obviously only did this for a photo and wouldn't go to a meet or anything with a tail

[Anonymous No.10402675]

>>10402053
I think if you used peplum skirts like : https://lolibrary.org/items/btssb-fairy-topialium-peplum you can make it lolita

[Anonymous No.10402731]

>>10399645
Even though this is borderline ita I really dig it.

[Anonymous No.10402733]

>>10398882
I'm really surprised she hasn't started flinging shit about the call out doc. Or everyone else for that matter. Everyone is still sucking up to her.

[Anonymous No.10402749]

>>10402731
why do you think its borderline ita ?I also dig it!

[Anonymous No.10402751]

>>10402733
Because the doc doesn’t really make her look that bad and it makes Hera look like a psycho bitch in comparison for writing that dissertation in the first place

[Anonymous No.10402752]

>>10402751
Is it worth my time to read the whole 100k word essay or can someone condense what was said down to a few paragraphs?

[Anonymous No.10402753]

>>10402751
It makes them both look crazy. I think it’s because her current lolita friend group kissed her ass so hard after the initial fallout between her and her friend, so they don’t want to walk back and admit that picking sides in this whole mess was stupid. Not responding the doc is smart. Most of her followers aren’t lolitas or even related to anything lolita, they just want to look at pictures of a stereotypical “goth” looking girl, so they don’t care about this drama.

[Anonymous No.10402755]

>>10402733
L has 6k followers and H has 200, it isnt that hard to ignore it since it isnt going viral.

>>10402752
I doubt cgl will let us tldr it, but its fun to read to see how dumb they both are.

[Anonymous No.10402786]

>>10402755
Christ, they're both batshit. Glad my lolita friends are normal.

[Anonymous No.10403362]

>>10399643
I feel strange about mermaid coords. the two aesthetics don't gel with me.

>>10402751
Drama between these people stays up for days, but mention k8 and....poof

[Anonymous No.10403390]

>>10402752
No it isn't worth it. Lolcow talking about it was pretty much a tl;dr.

[Anonymous No.10403568]

>>10402752
Not as is. It’s too long, poorly written, and kind of hard to follow. The actual drama behind it is kind of interesting though, she should’ve handed the material to someone who could actually make something worth reading out of it.

[Anonymous No.10403601]

>>10403568
oh, it's so badly written. It made it lose any impact, if they wanted to cancel her they should have been more concise.

The admittance that she just wants efame was hilarious.

[Anonymous No.10408146]

>>10399432
It's obvious in the doc that they both talk just as much shit about people. It looks to me like she started playing the role of being the nice person who wouldn't talk bad about others once she decided she wanted to set Lace up

[Anonymous No.10408148]

>>10399449
>ntayrt but guys fashion is ever changing. Saying that nowadays its like telling people to check out some old vogue magazines in order to support your outdated aesthetic values.
okay then check CoF or Japanese lolitas on Twitter, no one ever stopped wearing striped socks.

[Anonymous No.10408171]

>>10399730
you clearly dont know anything about Classic...there's nothing wrong with it.

[Anonymous No.10408196]

Daily EGL dump incoming

[Anonymous No.10408200]

>>10408196

[Anonymous No.10408201]

>>10408200

[Anonymous No.10408202]

>>10408201

[Anonymous No.10408204]

[Anonymous No.10408206]

>>10408204

[Anonymous No.10408210]

>>10408206

[Anonymous No.10408212]

>>10408210

[Anonymous No.10408213]

>>10408212

[Anonymous No.10408215]

>>10408213

[Anonymous No.10408217]

>>10408215

[Anonymous No.10408219]

>>10408217

[Anonymous No.10408222]

>>10408219

[Anonymous No.10408225]

>>10408222

[Anonymous No.10408227]

>>10408225

[Anonymous No.10408228]

>>10408227

[Anonymous No.10408230]

>>10408228

[Anonymous No.10408231]

>>10408230

[Anonymous No.10408232]

>>10408231

[Anonymous No.10408234]

>>10408232

[Anonymous No.10408252]

>>10408201
I dont get how people can take photos like this and think its good enough to post.

>>10408202
also wtf is this

[Anonymous No.10408261]

>>10408252
It’s the cat kumya pochette with a handmade dress in a tiny model house. I got confused before.

[Anonymous No.10408285]

>>10408261
dang i thought one of the furlitas acquired some taste

[Anonymous No.10408297]

>>10408261
how is this allowed as an outfit? It isnt a sewing group...

[Anonymous No.10408308]

>>10408200

that poor dress... the bodice isn’t supposed to look like that.

[Anonymous No.10408312]

>>10408297
It’s not her first time and no one was saying anything sooooo

[Anonymous No.10408315]

>>10408297
I think it's a cute idea, get that salt outta your cooch

[Anonymous No.10408318]

>>10408315
It’s a cute idea to share non Lolita outfits in a Lolita group? And you though sissies were bad, wait until the Bjd groups start showing up to post

[Anonymous No.10408321]

>>10408318
Now I know you're baiting 4/10 for making me reply

[Anonymous No.10408326]

>>10408202
is this a fursuit??? i'm scared

[Anonymous No.10408443]

>>10399682
She's so unoriginal..

[Anonymous No.10408444]

>>10408326
kys

[Anonymous No.10408449]

>>10408326
lmao, at first glance I thought furry too, but it's just the plush and it's obvious if you give it any thought

[Anonymous No.10408450]

>>10408443
At least her coords always look polished. Plenty of other people put out “unoriginal” coords, not sure why cute and simple outfits are such a sin.

[Anonymous No.10408452]

>>10399666
I usually like untucked blouses, but it definitely takes a certain hem to pull it off well and this blouse does not that that hem.

[Anonymous No.10408454]

>>10408443
>gets mad when lolitas don’t wear the fashion every single day
>also gets mad when a lolita has a consistent style/wardrobe

pick one cgl

[Anonymous No.10408455]

>>10408454
>anons are a hivemind!!!

[Anonymous No.10409113]

>>10408450
They don't look bad. Just tired of the same pose and theme. Also she's a huge two-faced bitch, so there's that too.

[Anonymous No.10409179]

>>10408202
This Mega-Kumya is amazing lmao

[Anonymous No.10409187]

>>10401152

you can... close your eyes y'know

[Anonymous No.10409189]

>>10408206
Where's this dress from? Is it the MMM or Seraphim one?

[Anonymous No.10409209]

>>10409189
Innocent world

[Anonymous No.10409219]

>>10409189
Innocent World is the only classic brand with enough shit taste to put heart buttons on an OP like this.

[Anonymous No.10409233]

>>10409113
We’re here to talk about coords, not your personal vendettas.

[Anonymous No.10409240]

>>10399687
What dress is this?

[Anonymous No.10409409]

>>10408202
It's a kumya in a dollhouse.

[Anonymous No.10409451]

>>10408217
Clout chasers out to chase some clout

[Anonymous No.10409489]

Why does this group even have mods?

[Anonymous No.10409491]

>>10409489
I repeat my question

[Anonymous No.10409526]

>>10409491
there was certainly some sort of attempt here, but I cannot tell with what

[Anonymous No.10409529]

>>10409451
somebody doesn't invest time into their wardrobe

[Anonymous No.10409533]

>>10409526
It reads more like a street fashion outfit rather than lolita. It doesn't help that the only remotely lolita item is the skirt.

[Anonymous No.10409541]

>>10409491
cholita

[Anonymous No.10409582]

>>10408196
her face always has this hysterical serial killer expression.. spooky

[Anonymous No.10409619]

>>10409489
Wait this is from COF??? Haha the new mods are so ita why are they approving this

>>10409491
This I think Maya approves horrible a la mode shit because it starts discussion of how not lolita it is. Any horrible enough "coord" blows up

[Anonymous No.10409624]

>>10409240
I turned my screen up all the way and still can't see it. Check AP USA for a set of a black jsk and top that has tiers like that (obviously the blouse is different), and also AtPie but i don't recognize it as any recent AtPie

[Anonymous No.10409788]

>>10409533
>It reads more like a street fashion outfit rather than lolita.
Who’s gonna tell her

[Anonymous No.10409805]

>>10409209
>>10409219
Totally skipped the heart shaped buttons, yuck. but the waist line is really pretty, thank you, anons! I'll consider this one with alterations.

[Anonymous No.10409869]

[Anonymous No.10409872]

>>10409869
This is awful, how come everyone is eating this up

[Anonymous No.10409876]

>>10409869
ew this is so weirdly frumpy and normie, it looks like her head was just pasted on there

[Anonymous No.10409892]

>>10409876
>weirdly normie
It has the right silhouette and stuff, but it doesn’t feel like a lolita coord. Maybe it’s the lack of accessories?

[Anonymous No.10409899]

>>10409869
The shoes and blouse and flower crown take away from the dress. This is more like some avant garde shit than lolita.

[Anonymous No.10409928]

>>10409869
>>10409892
The shoes, blouse, hairstyle, headpiece are all normie or normie adjacent, so putting them all together in one coord is making the overall aestheric stray too far from lolita

[Anonymous No.10410068]

>>10409892
i disagree with the silhouette personally because it's rather lampy, but it's because literally everything besides the dress is normie and plain.

[Anonymous No.10410112]

>>10409869
Frida Kahlo-kei

[Anonymous No.10414962]

>>10398487
You have plastered your vendetta all over this thread. Obviously you are in her com. You are looking pretty pathetic.

[Anonymous No.10417501]

You're all 10/10, too bad none of you is single