[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 587 KB, 1242x1191, F05961A0-ECF5-4E16-A051-7AD9B0722A1A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10292524 No.10292524 [Reply] [Original]

Thoughts on this?

While the ahegao hoodies are cringy, they aren’t actually unsafe, so I personally feel like the con is overreaching. If the purpose is to create a family-friendly environment, then what about suggestive cosplays? What about cosplays from R18 media? What about the R18 dakis in the artist alleys which are 3 post-its from being full NSFW?

>> No.10292527

>>10292524
As someone who frequents artist alleys, they don’t seem to be popular with children anyway.

>> No.10292534

>>10292524
>they aren’t actually unsafe
The post didn't claim they were. The reason given was that they're not age appropriate, which is true. In the replies they mention redesigning their mascot, which for a corporation, seems like a big gesture, so it's safe to assume that new policies regarding R18 media will follow.

>> No.10292538

>>10292534
In that case, I wonder if they will restrict non-sexual nsfw media as well.

>> No.10292571

>>10292524
They probably got tired of people not paying their ahegao loisence.

>> No.10292581

>>10292524
Good. Cons are events for everyone, including a lot of children, you shouldn't walk around them wearing literal porn on your clothes.

>> No.10292585

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

>> No.10292602

>>10292524
they already forgot about the Mais Shiranui cosplay drama, impressive

>> No.10292605

>>10292581
thats not "literal porn" have you EVER seen porn before ?

>> No.10292607

>>10292602
deets?

>> No.10292608

I think if they're gonna ban aheago, they should ban revealing cosplays as well.

>> No.10292609

>>10292608
agreed, if people are so worried about little kids they will have to ban all revealing cosplays, since we are at this argument...how many kids goes to those cons anyway ?
did people just say "yeah good lets ban it" without any research ?
idk anon...sometimes i really need to think about what it will become of this community

>> No.10292612

>>10292607
i think it was not only about tits but also about thighs

>> No.10292614

Can we start covering up thots too then. If a picture of a face is too sexual, you should see some of these tits hanging out.

>> No.10292627
File: 227 KB, 428x427, Screen Shot 2019-11-20 at 8.06.25 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10292627

I can't believe this is being banned, but people walk around cons almost completely naked... what makes that okay, but this not??

>> No.10292629

>>10292627
sense of high morality only but to be honest this shirt is only the beggining, soon everyone with the "wrong" cosplay will also be a NO-NO
desu i saw this comming miles away, first was the "loli police" after that milfs were considered kink for pedos then we started to mind the "wrong" cosplays and the kindergarden keeps moving. its just to make sure they have control, if you say that this shirt has nothing wrong they will come with the most idiotic and retarded argument "literaly porn"

>> No.10292630
File: 8 KB, 215x235, download (1).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10292630

>>10292629
sigh

>> No.10292635

>hoodie of girls having a seizure banned
>fat bnha cosplayers with like no underwear and tight suits on showing their ass crack and cameltoe is ok
ok con staff be like that

>> No.10292648

>>10292635
Its "tasteful nude"

:^)

>> No.10292652

>>10292635
>having a seizure

>> No.10292659

>>10292635
Ahegao hoodies are objectively sexual, but you’re not allowed to sexualize the fat bnha cosplayers with like no underwear and tight suits on showing their ass crack and cameltoe. If you think bnha characters are sexy then you’re literally a pedo, anon. :^( Please pray to your purist overlords for forgiveness before you get cancelled.

>> No.10292667
File: 25 KB, 420x470, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10292667

>>10292608
I kind of agree. You can be sexy without being outright lewd. Something like that the pic related should be banned because far too much is on display, she's practically naked. As long as the ass and pussy is completely covered and you have nothing more than cleavage, that's nothing that people don't already see on the streets or at a family beach.

>> No.10292687

>>10292524

I think its a slippery slope of no fun allowed that will eventually kill the event. People like these kind of events because of its culture, and if you start removing things deemed problematic you also start removing things people liked about these events.

I can see why they do it, i just don't like it, since it seems that events are getting stiffer with their policies.

>> No.10292750

>>10292687
it feel that people want to spoil their fun in the name of this neo-puritanism
>semi naked girls ? alright
>face depictions of hentai ? NONO because KIDS
how many kids even frequent those events ? you can be sure that this will leak into other forms of entertainment

>> No.10292777

all this talk about no fun allowed and slippery slopes. They're only banning people from wearing highly suggestive hentai illustrations. I personally am not a big fan of super revealing cosplays being worn in all-ages public settings (I don't disagree with them in general, there's just certain places for those), but at least these costumes are trying to be passed off as regular clothing for the character designs. While the costume itself is revealing, the character at least is not engaging in sexual activity.
If the source material is controlled media, I can understand not wanting it snuck onto clothing for everyone to see.

>> No.10292778

>>10292750
I remember being 4, and seeing people at the beach, guys in speedos, girls in bikinis. They were dressed up for the beach, it was whatever.
If I saw sex scenes on TV, jokes with sexual content or sex toys, I would ask my parents about this in a confused way.
Point is, most kids wouldn't care about skimpy costumes, but they would be confused by sexual stuff. Im 100% sure you could explain ahegao hoodies to kids as "girls sneezing" though, but you shouldnt have to.

>> No.10292791

>>10292778
yeah but how many kids like that visit these cons anyway ?
wouldnt it be just better to say "yo guys 12+ please"

>> No.10292916

"My bum is on your lips, my bum is on your lips"
And if I'm lucky, you might just give it a little kiss
And that's the message that we deliver to little kids
And expect them not to know what a woman's clitoris is

>> No.10292928

>>10292534
I think furries should be banned cause they keep inviting me to their orgys

>> No.10292930

>>10292524
Anime convention: lets ban pedobear, lolis and ahego

Also anime conventions: its okay to cosplay revealing cosplay

Such a double standard if youre talking about an all ages convention.

>> No.10292935

>>10292930
I'm sorry but lolis and pedobear are literal paedophile fodder. That shit is not comparable to seeing a thonged ass or even an ahegao hoodie.

>> No.10292937

Good, this shit is retarded. Imagine to be so fucking degenerate to wear this shit, only brainlets do that.

>> No.10292939

Even 4chan will give out warnings and bans for people posting cropped porn on blue boards depending on the mods. I do think there is a difference between a girl in skimpy clothes (which you can see on posters at the mall, magazines, public pools and beaches, etc) and images that are literally cropped rape or mindbreak porn. While they are technically censored, I just find them really tasteless, considering you're walking around with it literally plastering your body. I think the problem with it really comes in when you consider that young children or teens will mimic the face as a joke without fully understanding the context.

Even if you're buying porn doujins and prints at cons, you're expected to keep them covered up until you're in private. I don't think clothes should be any different.

And that's not even touching the fact that those hoodies literally art theft from the doujin artists.

>> No.10292940

>>10292939
>And that's not even touching the fact that those hoodies literally art theft from the doujin artists.
Artist alleys at big name cons constantly reprints or resell doujins, Fakku has resold tons of stolen translated shit. It's not worth noting since most doujin artists could give a shit less about oversea sales vs commissions

>> No.10292942

>>10292538
It's hard to say. Suggestive content seems to be okay so long as it isn't outright porn. R18 content will continue to exist too, probably just moved to 18+ zones or blackout screens. AA might not be able to sell it though, who knows

>> No.10292943

Ban lolitas, they are impersonating children to a certain degree in 3d!

>> No.10292945

>>10292935
So it's okay to see a g string ass and ballooned tits in a children friendly convention. Again double standard .

>> No.10292946

Ban all Yoko's, in ttgl Yoko was 13
Ban all lolitas, in anime they often tend to be stupid young
Ban all BnHA, as all of them are teens

>> No.10292947

>>10292943
Nice bait

>> No.10292949

>>10292947
It's just as dumb though, seriously who gives a shit about some dude being harmless in his le epic maymay jacket for laughs during a fad. There are far bigger/more pressing issues that could be handled.

>> No.10292950

>>10292524
Imo dakis hanging on display should never show the more lewd side whether censored or not (clothed side is ok). 18+ should only be available in a binder for people to peruse. In some of these aheagao hoodies, the girls have literal cum dripping down their faces, idk dude, feels weird to me to be walking around with cropped porn on your clothes. I'm not a fan of ahegao in general but I probably wouldn't wear a hoodie with orgasm faces, even if they were adorable faces to my sexual preference.

Depending on what it covers, revealing cosplays don't show more than what you would see in a beach. I know many conventions that have rules that draw the line there for revealing cosplays and that makes perfect sense to me (so they would allow a bikini bottom, but no g-string or no micro-kinis for example).

>> No.10292952
File: 43 KB, 400x350, stop liking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10292952

Are there any reports of families being harmed by ahegao clothing? I'm going to bet there isn't, and the ban is because of personal dislike of the clothing, and not because any problems have arose from them.
Imagine banning something just because you personally don't like it.

>> No.10292954

Can we ban deadpool players instead? I could give a shit less about some cropped hentai of all things.

>> No.10292955

Revealing cosplay = revealing clothes that show off a body and that’s it.
Ahegao hoodies = literal porn.

I don’t know why this is confusing to anyone.

>> No.10292958

>>10292955
Because men are dumb.

>> No.10292961

>>10292955
They are all cropped so it's not even bad, if you're that much of a special snowflake or trying to come off as that pure(especially with posting on 4chan), you should not go to cons.

>> No.10292963

>>10292961
You’re completely missing the point, this isn’t about me or other adults you idiot. There’s nothing wrong with children seeing revealing clothes, it’s not like women don’t wear thong bikinis or bralettes as tops in public. If you think children should be exposed to porn though you’re sick.

>> No.10292964

>>10292963
You probably shouldn't be bringing your children into anime cons given how they can be, seriously I don't understand why anyone would. Get a baby sitter.

>> No.10292966

>>10292964
I’m not sure why you’re assuming I have children. I don’t even like them, I’m just a decent person. You’re one of those people who think babies shouldn’t be allowed in public huh?

>> No.10292967

>>10292966
No americans just seem so pissy and offended when it comes to things like it, it's hilarious. Japan the these cons idolize have porn out in the open in places, big tiddy girls as mascots, and porn in kobinis right there. Europe has tons of shops in many countries without issues and only americans seem to be offended by it.

>> No.10292968

>>10292967
Japan’s age of consent is also disgustingly low, but you probably like that you sicko.

>> No.10292970

>>10292968
All prefectures have it to that similar as many states in the USA so I don't see your point, you americans are mental

>> No.10292972

>>10292955
a women's face is porn, but her full body isn't?
what

>> No.10292974

>>10292972
Naked doesn’t equal porn. I’m done arguing though, you all are really too stupid to insult. Can’t wait to see your mugshots :)

>> No.10292979

>>10292974
>Naked doesn’t equal porn.
but a face does?

>> No.10292981

>>10292979
It’s the context. Also those shirts are made with stolen art anyway without the permission from the actual artist so in a way it’s the same as banning bootlegs.

>> No.10292983

>>10292981
>It’s the context.
yes, the *context* is porn, but the actual images themselves are not.
>>10292981
>Also those shirts are made with stolen art anyway without the permission from the actual artist so in a way it’s the same as banning bootlegs.
I'd be 100% fine with banning the sale of the shirts.

>> No.10292988

>>10292981
>Also those shirts are made with stolen art anyway without the permission from the actual artist so in a way it’s the same as banning bootlegs.

90% of cosplay should be banned then, as esty/aliexpress/ebay/etc often rip off or blatantly steal shit and fork it over without paying dues to the company in question. Also copyright laws aren't as well protected unless there is presence within the US from asia, that's why a shit load of companies just open a small office in the USA so they can have legal protection on products in the usa.

>> No.10293005

>>10292983
>>10292939
There exists a version if the hoodie that’s been endorsed by the doujin artist themselves, so it’s not like you can say all ahegao hoodies are stolen art. Plus, there are a bunch of people walking around in replicas/bootlegs. It’s sensible to ban the sale of bootleg products, but dumb to ban people from wearing bootleg.

>> No.10293007

>>10292955
>sexualizing a woman’s body is okay
>a depiction of her pleasure is obscene though
Okay.

>> No.10293013

>>10292581
So if the context for the shirt is they tried some amazing ice cream while fully clothed and it threw them into a state of taste ecstasy then the shirt would be justified right?

>> No.10293016

>>10292983
nayrt, but the images ARE porn. They are cropped porn, but they're still porn. Everyone knows it's porn, and it's disgusting to wear in public around children.

>> No.10293017

>>10292955
Ahegao hoodies = literal porn.

meh by this logic excessively manicured feet could be considered fetish porn and we could justify banning sandals from all cons as well

>> No.10293018

>>10293017
how are orgasm faces not inherently pornographic?

>> No.10293021

imagine banning ahego hoodies and not literal molesters like momokun

>> No.10293025

>>10293018
Because those faces aren’t necessarily from sex. The context largely defines it so out of context, it could very well be someone blissful after tasting delicious food. It’s only degenerate because people in the community are aware of the implicit context, not because it’s inherently pornographic.

>> No.10293031

>>10293025
>Because those faces aren’t necessarily from sex.

They are, though. And everyone knows it.

>> No.10293049

>>10292750
> how many kids even frequent those events ?
It really depends on the context of the cons I think.Obviously collasal con and dragon con shouldn't have rules like this, but cons like anime boston and local smaller cons have a lot of kids in or under middle school age, and parents would definitely be skeptic of their 12 year old child taking a picture with a man wearing a hoodie of 12 year old lolis behind them in the background, especially if it's a recurring theme. It's a bit difference from a shirt with a lewdish design versus people wearing all out ahegao suits in the same room that's probably at least 25% kids under 16

>> No.10293059

They should ban thotsplays as well if that's the case.

Fuck this "For the Children" moral panic bullshit. Aheago clothes are fucking stupid but its your god given right to walk around looking like a fucking retard.

>> No.10293063

>>10293025
Not all, but...many of them...literally picture the girls with cum on their faces...please, enlighten me as to how cum isn’t sexual.

>> No.10293072

>>10293025
The meme is literally originated from porn. If someone made an ahegao shirt which collected only images from outside of porn/parodies of the faces from non sexual contexts, I think you'd have a complaint, but when most of those images are actually clipped from porn comics you cannot argue that it's not porn. The whole reason the meme is popular is because it's from porn. It's a way to be edgy/get male attention in an underhanded way and now that more people have caught on to the sexual component, of course it will be censored.

>> No.10293087

>>10292955
>lets ban bare feet on cons, those are LITERAL PORN
from now on you can only use cosplays with boots or shoes that hide your feet

>> No.10293090

>>10292968
look at this moral highground impressive...you must be so fun to chat with

>> No.10293097

If a kid that doesn't know hentai sees an ahegao hoodie he'll only see a "funny faces hoodie". It's only porn in context. Hell, even most normie adults I know don't realize it's porn. How is that going to be harmful for a kid in any way?

>> No.10293098

>>10292954
>>10292940
>Could give a shit less

It's "Couldn't give less of a shit", dumbass. The point is they care the absolute minimum, with no lower to possibly go.

>> No.10293102

I’d be fine with a con deciding to ban it. It’s quite clearly an edge case, cons have enough bs to l with

>> No.10293103

>>10293097
>sperm dripping from mouth
>only porn in context!
Pedos are getting desperate these days.

>> No.10293104

>>10293063
Incels, you can't explain that.

>> No.10293105

Deal with*

>> No.10293127
File: 68 KB, 540x720, cosplay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293127

>>10293104
>how to debate kindergarten
explain to me how someone that doesnt even know what cum is will be "harmed" by a representation of what cum seems like ?
you guys...you shouldnt be able to have opinions, all you have to show us is how imature yall are
>LITERALLY PORN
>KIDS DONT KNOW WHAT SEX IS SO ITS OK TO USE BIKINIS IN FRONT OF THEM
>SEX CROPPED FACES ARE HARMFULL
please...explain to us...why do use internet again ? you cant think like a mature reasonable person, how old are you ? why are you giving these weak excuses just to ban something YOU dont like, lets be honest here...its not about little kids, its about YOU, YOU dont like ahegao faces and want it OUT otherwise you would be THIS puritan agains cosplays...what do you think about revealing cosplays anon ?
is it OK for little kids to see cosplays ?

>> No.10293129

>>10293059
It actually isn't! It's illegal to show porn to children.

>> No.10293133

>>10293129
its not porn, there is NOTHING pornographic about it, all the sexual context was cropped out of the shirt, stop with the strawman argument

>> No.10293134

>>10293129
Good thing cropped faces aren’t porn then!

>> No.10293136
File: 366 KB, 1200x628, ahegao-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293136

What if you make the face IRL? Do you get thrown out?

>> No.10293138

>>10293136
they will make you use a burka you silly

>> No.10293141

Seems like antis have made their way to 4chan.

>> No.10293160

"You can't wear it at our event because there will be children"
Yet you can legally wear it around children everywhere else.

>> No.10293177

>>10293160
There are places where it's legal to walk around naked, that doesn't make it appropriate

>> No.10293202

"Ahegaos are harmful and have no place in con communities it's inappropriate!"

*to the left, a cosplay deviants booth with girls trying to get people to come inside or scout girls out to try and get them to submit a photoset*

*to the right, half-naked fanart of yaoi/yuri-bait with very blatent sexual context*

*behind me a booth selling nude body-pillows with post-it notes covering nipples and bits*

*in front of me half-naked My Hero cosplayers, probably underage, taking ship-photos and grinding on each other.*

Yeah sure, ahego hoodies are the real problem.

>> No.10293207

>>10293202
We can’t stop murders so I guess we shouldn’t bother making them illegal!

>> No.10293215

>>10293207
Thank you for agreeing that lewd cosplay and merch needs to be banned from events

>> No.10293219

>>10293215
if we're banning things, at least make it make sense.

>> No.10293222
File: 38 KB, 554x439, shrug.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293222

My local con has a ban on male nipples so

>> No.10293224

>>10293222
That's fair desu. If your can't free the nipple then all nipples should be imprisoned!

>> No.10293230

>>10293207
there it is...thats how we can find someone is full of BS
>person 1 points flaw in argument from person 2
>"BUT CLEARLY NOW WE SHOULD RAPE EVERYONE!"
why you just deal with extremes and cant answer properly ? do you know what nuance is ? cant you understand that banning "ahegao" shirt is dumb if you also dont ban all sexual sugestive vestiment and media from cons from your argument ? IF you are doing this for the little children you SHOULD be asking for ban on everything sexual, there is no middle ground since you are using children as a shield

>> No.10293239

>>10293133
>>10293134
It actually is porn!

I'd love for you to defend this position to an elementary school teacher or guidance counsellor or social worker. I'd love for you to show images of girls with cum on their faces to any adult above the age of 30 and ask them if it'd be appropriate to show to kids. Because they're gonna say no.

>> No.10293240

>>10293239
elementary school teacher with this level of argument ? good for us you are teaching little kids because your "argument" sounds a LOT like excuses, do you even know what it is porn "teacher" ?
>I'd love for you to show images of girls with cum on their faces to any adult above the age of 30 and ask them if it'd be appropriate to show to kids
cant you explain that is fucking WATER ? its a DRAW black and white...is that difficult to explain to kids these days ? are they born knowing what cum is btw ? what type of kid that DONT see porn DONT watch hentai DONT have contact with sex will look at a drawing and say "LOOK DAD! THIS GIRL IS HAVING RAGING ANAL SEX WITH CUM IN HER FACE!!!" please...could you just stop with the excuses ?

>> No.10293264

>>10293240
I didn't say I was a teacher. Learn to read before you try to argue with someone. Your English skills aren't good enough to try to debate anyone on anything, let alone this.

>> No.10293267

>>10293264
well im sorry for english not being my mother language are you willing to learn my langague like i am to learn yours ? THATS the moral superiority that makes you imature to debate this, its not my lacking english skills, its your trash moral superiority that just dont make SENSE
>lets ban ahegao shirt while keeping ALL the real porn that people sell on cons
imo you are just a coward running from the debate at this point

>> No.10293274

>>10292524

Anyone wearing an ahegao hoodie should be shot on sight.

>> No.10293277

>>10292627
Nudity isn't necessarily sexual. I guess it's like going to a beach? You're expecting to see t&a but it's not sexual. But a sexual hoodie IS sexual because it's meant to be.

Of course costhots are meant to be sexual, but if you say "you can't wear x cosplay that shows your cleavage" then that's silly. Agree that bikinis and super super revealing ones are a no. The last con I went to everyone was dressed fine aside from some misshapen lumpy troon in a bikini. Thanks for letting me see your beer gut, you're not a kawaii Loli like you think you are dude.

>> No.10293278

Twitter is hilarious.

"Haha, incels mad at banning their cum-stained hoodies"

two tweets down

"BUY MY AHEGO LEWD SET AND DON'T FORGET TO SUBSCRIBE TO MY PATREON FOR PREMIUM SNAPCHAT"

Thanks costhots, really cool!

>> No.10293287

>>10293278
Costhots and incels are like two peas in a pod.

>> No.10293289

>>10293287

It's like they're both the mirror universe version of the other.

>> No.10293297

it's silly but part of me is glad because I'm tired of seeing dudes in full body suits of them with their peanuts fully outlined in the tights
A ban is ridiculous but great schadenfreude

>> No.10293303

>>10292524
I hate this development. Cons and cosplayers used to be liberal and open, but it's been completely transformed into this total control ban everything mindset. It's become the complete opposite of what it used to be and what I liked about them.
Modern cosplay culture is so toxic, populated by the type of people I hate the most. Why do I even keep going. I hate cosplayers, scum of the earth.

>> No.10293305

>>10293303

Blame the SJW that have infested everything. Its not just cosplay.

>> No.10293306

Dude, all of you just stop feeding the incels

>> No.10293359

>>10293267
The actual porn being sold at conventions is only sold to people seeking it out who are 18+. It isn't the same as wearing porn in public and letting kids and those who don't want to see it see it. Not sure how you don't realize that.

>> No.10293366

There isn't cum on any of the faces on the ahegao shirt. It's all sweat and saliva.

>> No.10293373

If this gets popular with other cons it'll just make some people rebel by creating new shirts that offend in other ways. i.e. ryona shirt

>> No.10293387

So sunny bans a hoodie yet still has sellers sell loli body pillows? Yes, sounds about right!

>> No.10293406

I love my 2017 hoodie fuck the law.

>> No.10293407

>>10293224
#imprisonthenipple

>> No.10293437

>>10293359
show me the "literal porn" on the shirts please

>> No.10293468

I can agree with it, but I also can agree with the argument that display of 18+ anime and manga should likely also be banned. I can agree with the argument that anything that covers at least as much as a bikini can't really be banned because... it's a swimsuit. On the other hand... should Kill la Kill & Queen's Blade cosplay be banned? Likely so since the source material is adult in nature... Unless their issue is that some of the shirts contain images sometimes picked from hentai in which the character in question is under 18 which it may be to protect their asses under child obscenity laws. They did say they'll be updating rules later in the week so there may be stuff more inclusive of the underage yuri/yaoi fan shipping & everything else people have pointed out.
>>10293127
Well... anon has a point. An adult picking their kid up or escorting them may not recognize that girl in a bikini is from a blatantly sexual show, but may easily pick up that the expression in an ahegao shirt seems highly sexual. Think of The Little Mermaid... she's pretty much half-naked the entire show, but it's not sexual at all. Think of Sailor Moon... half the female villains are half naked and even the main characters wear little clothing, but it's not sexual. However, show those same parents the cropped face from a porno of a girl having an orgasm, and they'll likely know it's sexual.

>> No.10293474

>>10293437
It's printed all over. It should be easy for you to see. :)

>> No.10293475

>>10293468
>Well... anon has a point. An adult picking their kid up or escorting them may not recognize that girl in a bikini is from a blatantly sexual show, but may easily pick up that the expression in an ahegao shirt seems highly sexual. Think of The Little Mermaid... she's pretty much half-naked the entire show, but it's not sexual at all. Think of Sailor Moon... half the female villains are half naked and even the main characters wear little clothing, but it's not sexual. However, show those same parents the cropped face from a porno of a girl having an orgasm, and they'll likely know it's sexual.

you are not wrong anon but man...the hoops we will need to jump to be able to say "this is sexual and this is not" show me females cosplayers ( mostly costhots ) and it will be a sexual version of said anime, so instead of going thru that why not just make a research to know your public and depending just say "this is a 14+ or 16+ con" banning JUST the ahegao face is in itself double standard against everything else...anime is really mature, cons was all about freedom, we are banning everything now because someone felt harmed in some way

>> No.10293478
File: 21 KB, 683x241, defporn.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293478

>>10293474
>look at the definition of porn
how long are you going to repeat the same falacy anon ?

>> No.10293479

Also, they've likely targeted that in a public announcement for those people who aren't going to otherwise read the rules. The general public pretty much. Cosplayers, artists, and sellers will, of course, read the rules to know what is and isn't allowed, but those who are just coming as a bystander may not feel the need to read the rules since they're just throwing on a t-shirt and calling it a day.

>> No.10293483

>>10293475
I don't agree with it anymore then you, and it's a shitty situation, yes. It likely would be easier just to ban people under 18 since, any convention I've went to locally, only had a small number of underage participants, but... I guess they want to remain all-ages. I feel as those who grew up watching and reading anime & manga get older we'll likely see a lot more of this type of censorship since a lot of people are having children now, and... maybe it's more profitable to have those people bring their children versus banning children & losing attendees because said people can't find a babysitter they trust or afford it.

>> No.10293486

>>10293483
i think the BEST answer to this new public that want censor is to have cons +18, +16 and free of age, make it like they do in movies, +16 we have those bikini cosplays + suggestive clothes and +18 is no censor

>> No.10293492

>>10293486
Exactly. That's what I'm confused about... a lot of popular manga and anime is in that OT (16+) or explicit (18+) category... and how exactly are they gonna' account for that in an all-ages convention?

>> No.10293495 [DELETED] 

>>10293486
An example being my Chobit books. They say OT (16+) even though there's nudity and explicitly sexual themes... like the peep show venue chapter. Will that be banned?

>> No.10293499

>>10293486

>>10293486
An example being my Chobits books. They say OT (16+) even though there's nudity and explicitly sexual themes... like the peep show venue chapter. Will that be banned? (Of course, these were printed prior to the new child protection act, and such material may very well be rated 18+ now.)

>> No.10293504

>>10293499
anime is FULL of +18 stuff, we dont even need to talk about sex but these people are dishonest to the core and somehow ONLY the face is something harmfull for the kids. you can see they using "its literal porn" argument OVER AND OVER, they know what porn is...this "ITS LITERAL PORN" thing is just to make things seems worse than what actually is, they dont want to debate, they dont want to have a discussion, just ban what they dont like and THIS imo is harmfull

>> No.10293506

I mean, I get they wanna keep these things "Child friendly" but conventions are the only place that most of us can truly express ourselves. I get that wearing anything ahegao is "Degenerate" or whatever, But I am sure in someone elses eyes your cosplay, or fandom you may like is the same way.

Seems like more "Karens" are showing up to conventions to find stuff to bitch about... or bringing their kids getting mad about ahegao stuff, but cosplay uwu boys and kissing other uwu bois in front of their children, and also forcing said children to cosplay.

>> No.10293520

>>10292946
>in ttgl Yoko was 13
timeskip
>in anime they often tend to be stupid young
actually 1000 years old
>Ban all BnHA
Yes

>> No.10293523

>>10293506
its not if you go to twitter its just PC babies that are happy about it...people from comunity is angry, cons was all about be yourself, well...until they came in and now everything is harmfull, toxic and should be banned

>> No.10293527

>>10293523

PC babies and weeb shit do not mix.

>> No.10293544

>>10293478
> or activity
That’s the issue. Some parents aren’t comfortable with their kids seeing implied sex. The fact that anyone on this board seeing these hoodies can identify them as ahegao hoodies is more or less enough proof that a person can figure out the meaning of the images without actual genitals being shown.

And I mean, think about how censored a lot of children’s cartoons are. Anime is already pushing it for a lot of parents, I’m surprised it took this long for a con to take action

>> No.10293546

>>10293478
>or activity

That's what's happening there. How long are you going to keep not understanding that it is porn?

>> No.10293569 [DELETED] 

>>10293544
>>10293546
because SAID activity is cropped OUT of the image, you have to EXPLAIN to your child what sex is, what HENTAI is, what implication of SEX is, why its MORALY wrong to talk about sex in public is and then that little kid will feel harmed and you know what ? it would feel a kid understanding so much about sex to know what a ahegao face is, since we are at that start explaining about YAOI and YURI and what LOLI is because cons are FULL of that

>> No.10293570

>>10293544
>>10293546
because SAID activity is cropped OUT of the image, you have to EXPLAIN to your child what sex is, what HENTAI is, what implication of SEX is, why its MORALY wrong to talk about sex in public is and then that little kid will feel harmed and you know what ? it would feel weird a kid understanding so much about sex to know what a ahegao face is, since we are at that start explaining about YAOI and YURI and what LOLI is because cons are FULL of that

>> No.10293581

>>10293570
If a child sees people having sex, will they understand what’s happening? Of course not. It’s still something they shouldn’t see.

>> No.10293593

>>10293581
yeah...but they are not seeing SEX, you are jumping some stairs to validate your comment here, its a cropped image from girls having orgasm seizures, the parent has to go out of their way to explain WTH is that to begin with...so no...that kid would see funny cartoon faces

>> No.10293639
File: 31 KB, 422x724, xn0qOTO_d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293639

the real question is why y'all wanna wear chinese cartoon orgasm faces around kids so badly

>> No.10293668

>>10292916
ok eminem

>> No.10293677

>>10293593
I think the general consensus is while every seagull can see why it's banned that doesn't mean they can vibe with the bigger picture.

>> No.10293703

>>10293639
the real question is why is not ok to wear chinese orgasm faces around kids while selling LITERAL RAPE ?

>> No.10293734

>>10293506
>Karens

Most of it is probably Antis. They've infested online fandoms (see BNHA and Voltron) with weird puritanical bullshit, throwing around pedo accusations at anyone who ships the opposite of their uwu mlm flower crown fujobait, sending people death threats over anime porn, etc. They're probably starting to rattle their bones offline because their fandom purges are working too quickly on tumblr and twitter.

>> No.10293755
File: 136 KB, 750x860, D6396722-8DD4-486B-899E-61F6EB517B8B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293755

I kinda agree, op. I think ahegao hoodies are pretty retarded but this “think about the children” stuff is a little disingenuous. Cons have no shortage of sexually suggestive stuff with plenty of revealing cosplays. And I’m not talking about something you’d see at a beach, I’m talking about people wearing full-on lingerie with whips and chains, but it’s ok for the kids to see that? Shit, I’ve seen Bible Black cosplays and that’s literally a hentai. Should we ban those? I don’t know, it just seems like people don’t really hate the hoodies, just the neckbeards who wear them.

>> No.10293768

I feel like the ban makes more sense if you describe what ahegao is.
>No clothes depicting girls' orgasm faces
If you can make the argument that that's not what you're wearing, then great, but if your con patrol knows the source for anything on >>10292627 then you're out of luck because half of that is literal rape doujins.

I do think individual artists or booths saying "We don't sell to ahegao-hoodies" is funny and completely fine though.

>> No.10293793

Sounds like a slippery slope. I would have preferred them becoming a cringy thing by itself like yaoi paddled and fedoras.

>> No.10293794

>>10293793
I agree, cringing something out of existence is so much more effective than trying to moral-outrage-ban them.

>> No.10293795

>>10292667
I wanted to add a little something else. Whilst agegao hoodies are fucking cringe and distasteful, as walking around in nipple covers and a g-string in public, I think the best solution is just to ban anybody under 16.

>> No.10293799

>>10293793
Yaoi paddles did actually get banned out of existence from the assaults/injuries they were causing

>> No.10293801

>>10293799
I know that, but they were quite rare before that. Everyone already knew the stereotype of the hambeast who will assault you with a paddle.

>> No.10293832

>>10293593
>>10293570
you TYPE like an IDIOT. CAPS LOCK doesn't make your POINT better

>> No.10293834

>>10293768
My favorite is a tax or up charge to people wearing ahegao clothing

>> No.10293836

>>10293801
>but they were quite rare before that
There were several booths dedicated to them? They showed up in a thousands of photos and some people owned several dedicated to their favorite couples. They were extremely popular, what are you talking about?

>> No.10293837

>>10293832
prove it wrong tho

>> No.10293839

>>10293639
They think they are like cartman wearing a hitler costume


id say keep Ahegao shirts, it helps identify a certain group of retards

>> No.10293840

>>10293795
>ban anybody under 16.

there goes 80% of attendance, genius

>> No.10293842

>>10293305
>MUH ESS JAY DUBYA BOOGEYMAN

>> No.10293845

>>10293842
Who the fuck else do you think is getting upset over this shit?

>> No.10293849

>>10293845
anyone with a hint of decency

>> No.10293852

>>10293849
It's a fucking novelty item that will be forgotten in like two years and anyone with a half brain would release what kind of precedent banning even one "problematic" article of clothing would set.

>> No.10293862
File: 4 KB, 99x146, cosplayforkid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293862

>>10293849
>decency

>> No.10293863

>>10293837
I'm not going to argue with you about it, just type like a normal person.

>> No.10293866
File: 165 KB, 358x540, yaoicute.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293866

>>10293863
>do it for the little children

>> No.10293868

incels seething they cant make up for their lack of personality with shock value OH NO

>> No.10293869

>>10293866
> acting like some cons won’t ban you for this
Cosplay etiquette is a thing at family-friendly cons, and people have been and will be asked to leave if what they’re wearing is too risqué. It’s not a new concept to keep family-friendly spaces... family-friendly. This isn’t dragoncon banning ahegao hoodies. It’s not an 18+ con.

>> No.10293870

>>10293868
post physique

>> No.10293871

>>10292524
what a stupid ban
10yo+ kids already know what sex is. You're trying to be puritan for brats who probably have already searched onine for "naked men/women". I can't perceive any improvement this will bring to an event.

>> No.10293872

>>10292667
>Something like that the pic related should be banned because far too much is on display
Do you go to the beach?

>> No.10293873

>>10292946
>Ban all Yoko's, in ttgl Yoko was 13
she was 18 at the beginning of the series

>> No.10293874

>>10293222
eh
so ie, a Baki cosplay is forbidden?

>> No.10293875

>>10293871
>You're trying to be puritan for brats who probably have already searched onine for "naked men/women".
No, they're trying to be puritans because they're a bunch of neurotic, insecure control freaks.

>> No.10293880

>>10293734

Seems like the new age "fujo" crap is even more cringe than it was about 10~ years ago. These people get rabid over it and attack anyone who says the opposite of what they like..... and like you said, With death threats and other serious bullshit.. JUST BECAUSE someone didn't agree with their "uwu mlm flower crown fujobait"

I could rant all day about those crazy ass fandoms. Right now the BNHA and Voltron fandoms, With Hazbin hotel slowly coming up behind them are absolutely GARBAGE and full of some of the worse cringe ever. Hazbin hotel I think is trumping it all because it legit caters to all those "smol space bean uwu yaoi fujo bois" out there. But I digress...

They banned Yaoi paddles at cons, But those caused PHYSICAL harm.... but ahegao stuff? It's just a picture.... "oh it hurts my feelings and I don't like it"

>> No.10293884

Honestly, good riddance.

>> No.10293885

>>10293866
>how dare you make me use my only braincell to type like a human being
Don't confuse me with the other person you were arguing with.

>> No.10293894

even risque cospayers have to follow decency rules

dunno why this is such a big issue coming from a small con in the Uk, no ones forcing you to come

>> No.10293904

>>10293894
because rules like that leaks to other cons, we dont need another wave of puritans trying to rule out everything because they feel "harmed", look at the shit show it is BHNA fandom right now, if it was at least only for the cringe shirt but everyone know it will leak to everything else too

>> No.10293912

>>10293904
It isn't just for a "cringe shirt." It's for wearing porn around children.

>> No.10293913

>>10293912
>porn
anon...

>> No.10293924

>>10293366
In black and white it's hard to tell the difference my dude

>> No.10293926

Good. I only ever see fat autistic neckbeard types wearing them anyway. You know, the type that you already know is gross as fuck.

>> No.10293965

>>10293913
That's what it is. Feel free to dance around it all you want.

>>10293924
Some of them definitely have cum on their face.

>> No.10293966

>>10293924
>hard to tell the difference
Yeah, because it’s a simplified drawing.

>> No.10293968
File: 151 KB, 480x400, h73TKlh0TCKOZT10EZ6R6w (1).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10293968

>>10293289
>>10293287
check out my sex worker coomer

>> No.10293976

>>10292955
Men are too retarded to understand context, hence why they don't understand why cropped porn is worse than the same amount of skin you see in a swimsuit.

>> No.10293983

Scrotes seething, the bodies of real women offend them. Lol scrotes trying to act like they don't see worse everynight, fucking tools.

>> No.10293987

>>10293965
>That's what it is. Feel free to dance around it all you want.
people already debunked that on older posts, feel free to try to explain this "porn" in favor of the other porn that are also sold on con

>> No.10293988

>>10293904
>because rules like that leaks to other cons

god forbid pointing out the elephant in the room/the emperors new clothes

>> No.10293994

>>10293904
In any other public space that shit would get you kicked out make dealings anime cons aren't your safe space to be trash without repercussions

>> No.10293995

>>10293987
Nothing got debunked retard, cropped porn is still porn and plenty of people fap to it. Learn how to understand context, an orgasm face is very different from a normal face.

>> No.10293999

>>10293995
>Nothing got debunked retard, cropped porn is still porn and plenty of people fap to it. Learn how to understand context, an orgasm face is very different from a normal face.
oooh righ...everyone LOVE to fap to cropped images and face close ups, hey you can keep that falacy for all that i care, everyone is seeing you are full of BS already
>>10293994
we are not talking about ANY public space right ? cons was always about freedom are you going to cosplay in a morg ? lets keep this talk at least with a little bit of good sense

>> No.10294003

>>10293999
>cons were always about freedom
Hahaha wtf are you on about they're about anime you fucking retard. It's a big open space with lots of other people around and that makes it public. And weather or not you fap to ahegao is irrelevant, that shit is remarkably nsfw and everyone agrees. You would get fired if you wore that shit to work, stop being mad that people aren't putting up with your indecency you sweaty fucking virgin.
>Muh freedoms
Go make your own con then and apply your own rules

>> No.10294005

>>10293999
Some people fap to it, hence why individual pics of it get drawn by artists

>> No.10294008

>>10294005
>individual pics of it get drawn by artists
As an artist, no that is not why I would draw just an ahegao face. Drawing the entire act = porn, yea. Drawing just the face = meme/trolling my audience.

>> No.10294014

>>10293926
Even those guys have their right to wear ugly clothes

>> No.10294015

>>10294003
>>Muh freedoms
>Go make your own con then and apply your own rules
oh this is funny and weird, how many times people said that already XD

>> No.10294017

>>10294003
>Hahaha wtf are you on about they're about anime you fucking retard. It's a big open space with lots of other people around and that makes it public. And weather or not you fap to ahegao is irrelevant, that shit is remarkably nsfw and everyone agrees. You would get fired if you wore that shit to work, stop being mad that people aren't putting up with your indecency you sweaty fucking virgin.
again...why are bringing places where we have restrict dressing codes ? are you only able to deal with extremes anon ? look...its cringe but there are even worse things being sold at cons and all you care is about cropped faces, this is why everyone is calling your group out, its hypocrite it also dont help when you shield yourself with these low tier arguments trying to run from what wer are talking, CONS, we are not talking about my work place, malls, morgs, hotels, we are talking about CONS, stop with the autism and try to use that last brain cell to debate properly, if you cant be mature about this only issue you are not mature enough to call for ban of anything since your braincell cant deal with nuances

>> No.10294021

>>10294017
Bruh, plenty of cons put restrictions on what you can and can't wear. Tons of them have designated areas where sexey cosplay is allowed and you have to wear a jacket outside of them. A sizable portion of people don't want to see cropped porn if they can avoid it and that's why it's getting banned. A con is a public place like any other and there's tons of them that have bans on merchants selling porn, too. Go hang out at hentai-con if it hurts your incel neckbeard feels

>> No.10294023

>>10294014
And cons have a right to throw them out

>> No.10294026

>>10294021
thank you to keep on the subject, yeah i guess you are kinda right about 18+ areas, the issue here is, if weird face is now porn and is considered NSFW what is the new consensus about bikini cosplay ? what is family friendly and what its not so we can ban everything withou having to be dishonest about this ?

>> No.10294028

>>10294026
Things related to sex are sexual. It's not a weird face, it's an orgasm face and it literally comes from porn. Showing skin doesn't always have to be sexual, it's another matter of context. Everyone everywhere has seen a bikini or gone to the pool so it really just depends on what con you go to

>> No.10294029

>>10294028
look...showing HOW MUCH skin, right? skin is not sexual...its erotic, weird faces is not porn is kinda of erotic, going to pools and seeing bikinis depending on who is using is not sexual because no one is doing anything sexual about it, it is erotic tho, just like lingeries are erotic, the lack of act on the cropped faces takes the "sexual" and transform into erotic for us that understand the meme, people need to understand both, skin is and will always be as erotic as cartoons if portrayed right, this is my issue everyone is saying "skin isnt erotic" ignoring completely that ecchi is a thing, all you need is a look to be erotic, this is what im arguing, if you ignore bikinis because they are not "sexual" you should also ignore weird faces because they arent sexual either, sexual is the act being protrayed

>> No.10294030

>>10294029
Oh my god you are so obviously a man. Skin is not inherently erotic you absolute moron

>> No.10294031
File: 391 KB, 950x950, bikini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294031

>>10294030
for being a MAN i can say they are...skin is sexy, there is a reason why girls use tight and small clothes, bikinis are also a way to show off be it for men or women, erotism is also beauty
>img related

>> No.10294032

>>10294029
How are faces in the midst of sex not sexual? You don't go to the pool and see people having orgasms, you see them swiming, thus one is sexual and the other isn't. You keep saying "weird faces" as if that makes then nonsexual or something when they are. A persons body with concealed genitals isn't sexual just because you think they're hot, that's a matter of subjectivity. An orgasm face is sexual to anyone who sees it.

>> No.10294034

>>10294032
>How are faces in the midst of sex not sexual?
because they are cropped, we even had a drawer saying its not sexual it was more of a meme/troll to make fun
>You don't go to the pool and see people having orgasms
i dont know if you are baiting any more...sex is not the same as erotism, people on the pool can be erotic, it depends if they are cute or if they are ugly AF, erotism is all about the eyes of the beholder but its not sex, sex is the act being portrayed as a hole
>A persons body with concealed genitals isn't sexual just because you think they're hot, that's a matter of subjectivity. An orgasm face is sexual to anyone who sees it.
its erotic, stop placing erotism and sex as the same thing, dont you know what sex is ?

>> No.10294035
File: 32 KB, 795x355, eroticism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294035

>>10294032
>pic related

>> No.10294037

>>10294034
Holy fucking balls dude jesus.
>a drawer says they aren't sexual
Haha those wise drawers know it all right? I picture of a person having an orgasm is very, very sexual weather you want to admit it or not. It's directly related to sex and comes right out of porn. I don't find it hot, but does that make it any less of a hentai orgasm face? Of course not. Is a person in a bikini sexual? No. We see chicks in bikinis all the time at the pool. I see attractive people all the time on the street, but thinking they're hot doesn't instantly make them sexual and mean they should be censored. What you think is hot is subjective opinion. You don't see people cumming when you walk up and down the street, you only see that during sex or in porn and that makes it sexual. There are lots of people who don't want to see blatantly sexual imagery like that and that's why it's being banned.

>> No.10294038

>>10294031
Obviously you’ve never seen yourself naked

>> No.10294039

>>10294037
>Of course not. Is a person in a bikini sexual? No. We see chicks in bikinis all the time at the pool
are you dumb ? after i went all the way to explain what sex and eroticism is are you still going to use that falacy ? please, i said OVER AND OVER AGAIN, bikinis are erotic they are not sexual
>hot doesn't instantly make them sexual
again...you must be baiting
>You don't see people cumming when you walk up and down the street, you only see that during sex
omg...you really dont know what eroticism is, look if you cant be honest or understand the difference between sex and eroticism you just cant debate this, you cant have an opinion on this, you dont know, how can we debate or talk about something that you dont know ? look at this!
>You don't see people cumming when you walk up and down the street
look at that, why people dont go on street cumming and making weird faces ? why everything has to be extreme ? its only sex or not sex, there is no inbetween or you are banging someone or you are praying, thats the issue, this is the whole issue right over here, you dont understand or you dont wanna because it will make you seem wrong, why cant you understand i cant believe you are that young that you dont know what those two words are, no matter what i say it will always be wrong because you dont understand what im talking even tho i explained it already. you are not ready or mature enough for this discussion you dont know what sex or eroticism is

>> No.10294040

>>10294038
well im not gay if thats what you are implying, so no matter how much i see myself or another man bare nacked i wouldnt think its hot...there is no attraction going on to be erotic for me

>> No.10294041

>Facial expressions are hurting children
THIS IS WHY YOUR CIVILIZATION IS DYING YOU STUPID ANGLO FUCKS. WHY DON'T YOU STOP GOING TO CONS AND START REMOVING KEBAB IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN SO FUCKING MUCH.
Yeah, for those who didn't bother to check, it's in Britain.

>> No.10294045

>>10294026
>if weird face is now porn and is considered NSFW
You mean if "orgasm face is now porn and is considered NSFW". You're being willfully ignorant to address the that fact it is and has always been related to sex.

>> No.10294046

>>10294031
I like how you included an image of a bikini as if it needed further explaining.

>> No.10294047
File: 45 KB, 640x496, get a load of this guy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294047

>>10294041

>> No.10294048

>>10294039
>after I went all the way to incorrectly explain what sex and eroticism is

>> No.10294050

I came here thinking this ban was kind of silly, but after losing too many braincells reading this thread I am now firmly Team Ban Ahegao Hoodies. The incels are actually so bad at making their point that their arguments loop around and work against them.

>> No.10294051

What a sad world we live in where people are so perverted they don't even want to admit that orgasm pictures are related to sex and shouldn't be viewed by kids. Who cares if they can find it online you shouldn't actively contribute to or be fine with the problem

>> No.10294054

>>10294046
it felt like i was talking with a bunch of preteens kids trying to be edgy saying everything = sex, after another anon pointed out this con was from britain i kinda gave up, they will keep hammering the same note to exhaustion, bikinis = not related and weird faces = sex

>> No.10294057

>>10294054
Oh don't be mistaken, I don't agree with you in the slightest. I was just laughing over the fact that you added a picture thinking that the person you were arguing with somehow didn't know what a bikini was and that by providing a picture it would somehow help your point.

>> No.10294058

>>10294057
thats cool, im not going to burn you on the torch if you wanna know, i really just gave up, people seem to not know what a bikini is since they are still trying to compare bikinis with sex

>> No.10294059

>>10292524
Good, I'm happy they're banned.

>> No.10294062

>>10294023
You're right, but don't cry once they throw the next thing you care about because "it's harmful to zoomers".

>> No.10294066

What about Mega Milk shirts?

>> No.10294067

If they want to ban them, go ahead. I just don't like that they lie about the reasons. It's not "for the children". It's because they make some adults uncomfortable.

When children see furries, they see a funny animal costume. Adults sees a pervert who most likely has very kinky sex in that costume. It makes the adults uncomfortable when they see children posing with furries, not the children.

>> No.10294070

>all this neckbeard rage
Holy shit you incels could not be more out of touch with reality to think this ban is without warrent

>> No.10294072

>>10294070
i would say this is being brigaded by antis like you but dont let me stop you, ban everything

>> No.10294116

Ahegao clothing is the lowest brow humor if you can even call it that, but banning lewd shit for underageds is dumb and will 100% alienate your congoers since a lot of them are into it. Seriously, have they seen the crowds around sakimichan and REIQ stalls at cons?

I GUARANTEE the artists will lose money with this, since it's a well known fact porn and lewd shit>>>>worksafe art in terms of money since it's the neckbeards that have the big bux. Artists will boycott these cons, and then congoers will too.

Tldr I hate ahegao and I don't care much for lewds at cons but it's a retarded idea from every angle

>> No.10294121

>>10293872
are talking about a nudist beach because at a normal beach that much breast and groin area skin isnt exposed.

>> No.10294123

>>10294116
I think they'll do just fine, kiddo.

>> No.10294124

>>10293999
>cons was always about freedom

Its just a congregation of people with similar interests, its no different from bars, churches, stadiums which have rules

>> No.10294125

anyone defending this is the reason otaku culture remains stagnant and lowbrow

>> No.10294126

>>10294121
Depending on the country, women can (and do) go topless on normal beaches, you don’t need to go to a nudist beach to see this much. In fact, you can see more since they don’t need to cover nipples.

>> No.10294127

why are incels now finding out that cons have this thing called RULES?

>> No.10294135

>>10292524
>"it's from porn so it's bad"
>okay so are you banning bible black schoolgirl cosplay too?
>"no, we don't care about that"
this is basically the #1 reason why I don't staff cons anymore. nobody fucking cares, it's all run by reactionaries who just pull the rules out of their ass as they go. things only get addressed when people complain loudly enough.

>> No.10294146

>>10294135
You dont staff cons because you're an out of touch boomer that thinks bible black is relevant to the current anime con scene.

>> No.10294148

>>10294135
The difference is that with the cosplay, you aren't seeing the character get dicked down right before your very eyes. Unless their outfit was breaking con rules, the fact that they are from something pornographic isn't the problem, it's the fact that pornographic scenes from the source are being shown in public. If someone had a screenshot of bible black on their shirt depicting something sexual they would probably be asked to change. A person existing in a costume to reference something sexual that you would have to look up in private is not inherently sexual.

>> No.10294150

>>10294148
>you aren't seeing the character get dicked down right before your very eyes
Same goes for ahegao shirts though? You would have to look up the doujin in private to see the sex portion.

>> No.10294151

>>10294146
Ok zoomer

>> No.10294152

>>10292608
thirding this, bikini cosplayers are cancer

>>10292627
they probably want to ban both but can't ban the naked cosplayers because muh body positivity

>> No.10294153

God I hate this timeline where we have to pander to fucking kids and adults who still think they're kids, as if you all didn't laugh at Boku no Pico memes

>> No.10294154

>>10294148
You say that now, but let's see what happens in a year.

I've been investigating tumblr since 2011 or 2012 and I've seen what a slipplery slope it has been when people started validating their snowflake opinions like they matter.

>> No.10294156
File: 159 KB, 1080x1557, tucky 4chan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294156

Torys and Brexit voters wear Aheago apparently

>> No.10294157

>>10294156
Not sure if it's a good idea to mix politics with your convention

>> No.10294168

>>10294039
Sexual and erotic are synonyms, ESL-chan.

>> No.10294174

>>10293904
This.
>>10293994
>anime cons aren't your safe space to be trash without repercussions
How is wearing an ahegao hood "to be trash"??
It's not political by any means, it's not offensive by any means. It's literally just faces of girls having sex. God forbid such a sin, right, anon? /s

>> No.10294177

>>10294121
>are talking about a nudist beach because at a normal beach that much breast and groin area skin isnt exposed.
Not at all, I've seen a lot of bikinis which show about as much skin as that pic. 99% of bikinis cover just slightly more.
And I don't think anyone stopped taking their kids to the beach because of bikinis/swimming trunks. Nor I've heard of a child getting traumatized for seeing adults wearing beach clothes.

>> No.10294198

>>10292524
Much as I hate ahegao, I think this is pointless. I've seen high school students wear ahegao shirts multiple times to school, and they don't get in trouble because the dumbass boomer teachers don't know what it is. Some 5-year-old going to a convention with their mom isn't going to know what it is.
And o top of that, conventions really aren't the most kid-friendly of spaces. Yaoi paddles were banned as a safety concern back in ye olden days. I've seen several raver girls whole asses hanging out in the middle of the con floor (and a 5-year-old is going to see up far more skirts than an adult whether they want to or not) just this past month. A lot of cosplays are sexual or are made to be that way by the person cosplaying. Most panels are told to keep things "PG-13." Some 18+ panels don't card those who enter. Half-naked figurines, doujinshi for sale, real weapons for sale in the dealer room.
Anime conventions are inherently not the most kid-friendly places, and have been before ahegao shirts came along.

>> No.10294199

>>10292954
I haven't seen too many Deadpools at the last couple of conventions I was at, maybe the fad is dying and we won't need to

>>10293160
It's basically like smoking, except instead of having to smell the smoke you have to see the degeneracy

>>10293468
Kill la Kill happened right in the middle of the body positivity movement, I imagine a lot of cons wanted to ban Nudist Beach cosplay but their hands were tied. Pedos probably had a field day that year.

>>10293506
>But I am sure in someone elses eyes your cosplay, or fandom you may like is the same way
German military cosplays come to mind for me, especially since a lot of cons banned them last year. However, given the current political climate, I'd say the ban was justified.

>>10293755
>>10294135
>I’ve seen Bible Black cosplays
lowkey I miss when that was the goto "shock" hentai that was one step down from Boku no Pico. Euphoria is just not as aesthetic as BB was

>>10294066
in five years of going to cons I've seen maybe one Mega Milk shirt, as opposed to the countless ahegao prints

>>10294154
that was around the time when Deviantart refugees started flooding the site, it goes deeper than you think

>> No.10294203

>>10292667
What about, say, a cosplay like Midnight from BNHA? She technically covers up everything except face, neck and hands, but she's called the "18+ Only Hero" in the series, carries a flogger, and dresses like a Dominatrix. Is it still kid-appropriate to wear a cosplay of her because most of body is covered in a skintight suit or fetish gear?

>> No.10294204

>>10294198
>real weapons for sale in the dealer room
Anon violence is not a problem in the United States of America. It's all that gross sex stuff.

>> No.10294205

>>10292981
>>10292988
Literally even if the cosplayer painstakingly made something by hand, it's still illegal unless they have permission from the person who has a copyright over that character. Yaya Han? Breaking copyright law.
So are anyone at the artist alley selling fanart/anything containing copyrighted characters that are not their own. So are the rooms that show anime.
Copyright law is very touchy and broken by probably every anime convention in existence.

>> No.10294208

>>10293239
NAYRT but I've said it once and I'll say it again.
I'm a high school teacher. Students wear ahegao shirts and get away with it, because the normie teachers don't know what that shit is.

>> No.10294217

>>10294066
It's text on a shirt containing no inappropriate words and no indication of its sexual context. Completely harmless.

>> No.10294218

>>10294116
>Artists will boycott these cons, and then congoers will too.
It's not a serious enough offense for some mass boycott, dude chill.

>> No.10294219

>>10294150
You don't need more context to understand that an orgasm face is from sex. It doesn't matter if it's cropped out, it's still inherently in the image. Imagine if you did the same with women's faces, covered in cum or otherwise, from porn videos. There would be no denying where it came from.

>> No.10294220

>>10294174
> it's not offensive by any means. It's literally just faces of girls having sex.
How can you honest to god type those sentences out right next to each other and not get it through your skull.

>> No.10294227

>>10294220
Is a drawing of someone having sex offensive to you?

>> No.10294230

>>10294227
Offensive? No. Inappropriate in a public setting? Yes.

>> No.10294231

>>10294220
Do you believe that just wearing >>10292627 is offensive?
If you think so, I'm not sure what to say. It does not make fun of one's sexuality/religion, it does not shame anyone for their sexual orientations, it's not political. I don't want to put words in your post, but I can't find a reason to find it offensive other than puritanism.

>> No.10294232

>>10294230
>Inappropriate in a public setting? Yes.
Guess we should ban all movies that feature sex scenes from being shown in public.

>> No.10294247

>>10294232
Except movies have ratings on them and require you to be of a certain age in some instances.

>> No.10294250

>>10292524
wtf

>> No.10294259

>>10294231
Anon literally said it's not offensive but it is innapropriate, read their post again.

Not them, but I don't want to see depictions of rape mindbreak on someone's clothes. I don't care if they read it in private, hell I've read some of those doujins myself which is why I know the exact context, but I feel uneasy seeing it in public.

>> No.10294264

>>10294259
>Anon literally said it's not offensive but it is innapropriate, read their post again.
You should read the post chain again, the word "innapropriate" doesn't appear once, but "offensive" is right there.
FYI, I don't think the ahegao hood is either.
>I feel uneasy seeing it in public.
Do you think that this justification is enough to warrant telling other people to not wear clothes they paid for?

>> No.10294274

>>10293768
>No clothes depicting girls' orgasm faces
Then the very next day you'd see some smartass wearing one depicting guys' orgasm faces

>> No.10294276

>>10294274
this would be REALLY FUNNY XD i want that

>> No.10294281

You all are really getting mad over some shitty print hoodies geting banned. I guarantee you that no one would know the difference of them NOT being there and this is just one con, if you hate/dislike it lol don't go. Plus they don't even make up a good portion of con attendance. Last year I saw a good 3 or 4 in full ahegao track suit.

The reason behind it is super silly but be glad that they didn't banned nude type cosplay. You can still see titties and ass but not on a shirt.

>> No.10294287

>>10292524
It's a shame that they've been banned because how else can girls id con creeps now?

>> No.10294302

try to wear a shirt patterned with the Holocaust or the lynching/hanging of african american

>> No.10294315

>>10294264
Technically there’s no law against wearing bondage gear in public as long as all the bits are covered, that doesn’t make it appropriate and I don’t care what was paid for it, not my problem.

>> No.10294328

>>10294315
>that doesn’t make it appropriate and I don’t care what was paid for it, not my problem.
By that reasoning, neither is their problem that you somehow feel uncomfortable because of a hood.

>> No.10294386

>>10294274
I'd prefer that, if only because it would probably get all variations of ahegao shirts banned quicker

>> No.10294394

It does kind of worry me when I see 14 yo girls wearing these hoodies and adult men encouraging them online because to them it’s a funny meme. Combine this with the thot culture that sadly has injected itself into cosplay, you see these same girls wanting to become ”e-girls”.

I don’t know why the fuck men are like this. If you want to wear your ugly hoodie because you need to make up for your lack of personality then go ahead. But there’s something wrong with you if you willingly engage with minors and encourage them to sexualize themselves.

>> No.10294397

>>10294394
>It does kind of worry me when I see 14 yo girls wearing these hoodies
because god forbid that teenagers read doujins.
>there’s something wrong with you if you willingly engage with minors and encourage them to sexualize themselves.
It's absurd to extrapolate "hey, let's not ban clothes because it's stupid" to "engage with minors and sexualize themselves". No one defended the latter.

Going by your example, it's up to their parents to decide whether it's ok for them or not. If it was my kid, I'd probably be fine with it as long as:
1. They know what they are wearing, and where the pics came from;
2. They are aware that it may attract the wrong kind of attention, and they know how to react to it.
3. They are doing better than average at school to justify buying them a meme cloth.

>> No.10294403

>>10294328
No?? How are you this stupid?? How does someone whose skull has never felt the moist touch of a brain remember to breathe??

>> No.10294416

I'd say if you're mad about this to do some self reflection about why you want to wear girl's sexualized faces on your body in public so bad, but I doubt anyone who thinks theses are appropriate to wear in public are capable of self reflection.
>>10294397
>because god forbid that teenagers read doujins.
The argument that kids shouldn't be exposed to sexual content by strangers because they've already been exposed to sexual content isn't actually as good as you think it is.

>> No.10294423

>>10294152
I for one rather not wanna see stomach rolls, stretch marks and saggy boobies over ahego clothing

>> No.10294433

Why ban these and not shirts with corny sex puns or other inappropiate images like blood etc? How far are they willing to ban clothing that may or may not make other people uncomfortable?
At least the hoodies and tracksuits cover your body. I don't want to see shirtless people and bikinis everywhere.

>> No.10294437

I suggest we ban the following for being sinful, degenerate and especially harmful to children:
>aheago
>gore/blood/horror
>lolita
>joker/harley
>thotsplayers
>weapons

>> No.10294438

>>10294437
The fuck is your problem with lolita fashion? It’s probably the most conservative street fashion there is.

>> No.10294441

>>10294438
Children get curious and eventually get to reading Lolita and most will probably get into lolicon. We have no choice but to ban it.

>> No.10294446

>>10294423
>>10294433
>>10294437
>>10294441
Literally one samefag who is way too invested in sex clothing. Don't you have something better to do on a saturday night?

>> No.10294455

>>10294441
There’s absolutely no correlation between these...do you actually read what you’re typing or is it just word vomit?

>> No.10294457
File: 174 KB, 1440x411, 20191124_004456.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294457

>>10294446
That's some nice projection
>inb4 phoneposting
I know shut up I'm going to bed now

>> No.10294461

>>10294455
It's a joke you absolute bellend... christ the state of this board is just sad.

>> No.10294473 [DELETED] 

>>10294397
I was talking about 14 yos like Luciboi who wear those clothes in public and talk about hentai, and then grown men go tell her how wholesome and cool she is for doing that. How is this not grooming. There was this grown-ass nerd posing with her with caption ”kids wear ahegao hoodies too!” but he had the decency to delete the tweet after it went viral.

Yes I know teens read doujins. But when they talk about hentai and do this, it’s not up to the adults to encourage them. And sadly the cosplay community doesn’t seem to make these nerds clear enough that interacting with kids even if they wear your ugly hentai clothes is bad.

Just ban all men from cons, that will do.

>> No.10294480

>>10292916
May I have your attention please:
Will the real Slim Shady please stand up.

>> No.10294485
File: 66 KB, 400x222, B0C80FA1-31D6-4CC0-981C-DCC1150E3041.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294485

>> No.10294490

>>10294416
>exposed to sexual content by strangers
It’s natural for teens to sexually explore? What makes you think they didn’t seek it out as opposed to an adult with malicious intentions showing it to them? Only Americans seem to think kids are sexless beings that will be corrupted if they see a boob or discover that their parents fucked to make them.

>> No.10294492

>>10294302
It’s kind of sad that you associate sex and orgasms with genocide and systemic violence.

>> No.10294529

>>10294416
Anon, they wish to wear them because the convention was one of the few places where it's actually appropriate to wear girl's o-faces.
>>10294394
Anon, our culture has never been pure. Anime & manga has never been pure. Truth be told, we support one of the most degrading & vile subcultures on Earth. It's because of the culture that we have this discussion in the first place & it's got nothing to do with thots. Thots are honestly less vile then your average weeb.

>> No.10294530

>>10294529
And before anyone argues, we've been cracking jokes about old men looking at a 16-year-old's crotch since 1984. It's never been 'pure'.

>> No.10294531

>>10292581
>including a lot of children
Fuck off, boomer.

>> No.10294564

>>10294531
Fuck off pedo

>> No.10294674

>>10294490
Drawn depictions of rape are not a good way for a child or teenager to explore sexual content.

Why does that even need saying

>> No.10294680

>>10294674
>all hentai is rape on paper
do you see what you type or

>> No.10294696

>>10294674
Only uwu soft vanilla missionary sex then? That wouldn’t be much of an exploration. It’s better to teach children/teens how to navigate the territory than just ban them from interacting with certain things. Teens should know (and usually do know) what sex is. They should know what turns them on- and what doesn’t. It’s better to have them deal with these scenarios in fiction than on the spot in real life.

>> No.10294702

>>10294674
aw man...anon...

>> No.10294703

>>10294680
Most of the doujins on that sweatshirt is from rape though?

>>10294696
Personally I agree that teens/kids should be allowed to explore their personal interest in sex, especially because it’s everywhere in poo culture. But I can understand why people wouldn’t want to see this shirt out in public- teens going on pornhub at home aren’t exactly blasting it on the street because for most people, sex (and personal fetishes) is a more private topic.
That being said, ahegao sweaters are kind of helpful for teens knowing who to avoid, so this is a mixed flag

>> No.10294711

>>10294703
I find that a lot of the ahegao hoodies wearers /are/ teens. Their way of interacting with the material, I guess. It’s literal chuuni wear. Kind of like menhera. But cons aren’t banning menhera because the themes of sex are somehow more taboo than depression or violence.

>> No.10294712

>>10294455
>>10294446
I think the fact that you didn't notice the obvious irony in >>10294437 and >>10294441 shows why this slippery slope in banning clothes is a bad idea.
>Banning lolita/joker/weapons because it's sinful, degenerate and especially harmful to children
The above should be an obvious ironic joke, yet we got into a point someone might take it seriously.

Worst case, they will agree with it out of fear of being pointed out as a weirdo/pedo.
>teens going on pornhub at home aren’t exactly blasting it on the street
They are.

>> No.10294720
File: 52 KB, 480x509, CE45E98B-9608-41D3-ABE9-3B82BF47DFBB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294720

>> No.10294723

>>10294720
the absolute madlad

>> No.10294731

>>10294720
Someone call CPS on their parents. Yikes

>> No.10294738

>>10294720
She already deleted that tweet before but it was kind of gross how grown men were telling how cool she is for doing that considering she is 14 and the other kid is like 10
Reminds me of the girl in my local comm who used to be groomed that way as a teen when adult men told she is cute for liking hentai

>> No.10294761
File: 59 KB, 1080x1077, FB_IMG_1574620154401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294761

>ahegao is toxic kids might see!
>meanwhile at cons

>> No.10294764

kind of disappointed because it was the easiest way to know who to stay very far away from at a con

>> No.10294765

>>10294761
It must an 18+ panel

>> No.10294774

>>10294529
not every weeb is also into ecchi/hentai though, they're not the same things as regular anime/manga, so I don't think you can call the whole culture not pure
although I will admit that in my local anime fans discord server 99% of the people are in the nsfw channels but most people in general no matter their interests/hobby's are perverted by default so I'm not sure that says anything about anime/manga/weeb culture in particular..

>> No.10294863

>>10294247
>>10294232
Ergo, we do ban them.

>> No.10294864
File: 201 KB, 1592x1592, 57462715_2286002731456864_1539854378159046656_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10294864

can I just point out that Sunnycon doesn't mind lolis or uwu daddy needs cumcum profile pic. However suggestive faces are a no go

>> No.10294879

wait a second, is that an UK con?
that does explain a lot.

>> No.10294885

i hope they enforce their rules

>> No.10294908

>>10294864
>Convention who's mascot is highly suggestive bans highly suggestive images on clothing

Got it.

>> No.10294912

>>10294908
lmao you're right
the irony is rich
unfortunately, instead of pulling their heads out of their ass, they might just put the character in a burqa.

>> No.10294935

>>10294863
YOU BAN MOVIES ? aw man...what a shitty country you live in

>> No.10294985

ahegao is cringe but banning it is even more cringe. If cons kicked more underageds out it would be a good net effect all things considered (esp since they tend to follow seinen shows or shows that are more adult that they are. however, I also do hate the pornposters.

>> No.10295003

>>10294864
>noticed front page has mascot in meme keyhole lingerie.
Okay, fair enough. They're hypocrites.

>> No.10295021

Ethically I'm not for banning them but seeing cumbrain weebs act like they're oppressed because they're not allowed to wear cropped hentai is hilarious.

>> No.10295162
File: 212 KB, 521x377, ohno.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10295162

>>10292524

>> No.10295164

>>10295021
Yeah, same.

>> No.10295233

On one hand as long as it's merely suggestive and not explicit I don't really think it should be banned, that's opening a whole can of worms that doesn't need to be opened.
On the other hand the twitter weebs actually upset that they can't wear their stupid meme hoodie and making poor faith arguments about cosplay are drooling retards and need to be gassed, while we're at it ban portable speakers and all Filthy Frank cosplay too.

>> No.10295260

>>10295233
do we ban boobs or side boobs? Isn't showing flesh inappropriate to kids?

>> No.10295283

>>10295260
it is, ban bare shoulders since we are talking about boobs

>> No.10295420

>>10294864
If you look through the original post chain on twitter, they do mention that they are redesigning their mascot.

>> No.10295421

>>10294935
If only your purchase of an ahegao hoodie came with an ounce of reading comprehension.

>> No.10295423
File: 941 KB, 1350x1920, 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10295423

>>10295421
just so you know, i dont have one i find it really ugly but i also find ugly hypocrites that calls everything porn

>> No.10295458

>>10295420
only because they got called out for it. Tucky loves his lolis and suggestive faces on anyone

>> No.10295477

>>10295423
That's not ahegao face, ahegao is exaggerating to the point where it's demeaning, which is the point, which is why I understand banning it. They really do need to update their mascot as well.

>> No.10295483

>>10295477
anon be honest, do you think this is porn ?
>>10295162

>> No.10295613

>>10292524
Good, shits fucking embarrassing.

>> No.10295615

Lots of talk about kids but I'll be honest, I've never seen someone over the age of 21 wear one of those stupid things. I'm willing to file this under "stupid cringey shit teenagers and some manchildren do at cons" and ignore it. At least no one's getting their bones broken by a paddle, just outing themselves as lacking basic social etiquette.

>> No.10295618

>>10292524
Not only are they embarrassing and poor taste, they’re also...
- Usually from moral degradation/rape doujins (including ones by Asanagi which is all about degrading women and making them make “shameful” faces)

>> No.10295620

>>10295423
That’s torogao (“melty face”)

>>10295162
That’s ahegao (“panting face”)

>> No.10295778

>>10295615
I do love how a lot posting saying "yes! you did the right thing this is so bad for kids"

How many of them are actually parents and understand what kids are looking at or offended by? Pretty sure most parents don't even care about ahegao

>> No.10295851

Good lol if you wear those cringy ass hoodies you deserve to get punched

>> No.10295897

>>10295483
The joke is fucking obviously supposed to be "You think she's making a stupid sex face but actually it turns out she's not having sex!" which is the same thing out of context. You're supposed to see and recognize it as a sex face. Removing it from context removes it from the explanation that it's "not actually" porn and indistinguishable from the faces that are actually porn, and that's fully intentional. I've never argued that the shirts themselves are literally porn, but they absolutely are meant to be stealth sexual explicit content and I think it's right to remove them from all ages events. Just keep it in your bag and throw it on for drinking after you leave the con. You're not being oppressed because you can't wear your loli sex shirt around kids.

>> No.10296102

I never got ahegao, women making retarded faces just makes it seem like they are faking it and it's a total boner killer.
But banning cropped shit is just retarded because it can start a slippery slope plus if you let people wear them it serves as a retard filter.

>> No.10296260

Most kids know about Belle Delphine so why is this any different? Surely it is up to the parents to teach them.

>> No.10296320

>>10296260
That's indicative of the problem though. Youtube has very poor restrictions on kids content - especially on their kids app, so when their favorite grown up youtubers are talking about her and her ahegao face, they can still see it. Parents absolutely should be monitoring what their children are watching, but to be fair the app is marketed to be completely kid friendly. It's the same with the ban. Ahegao hoodies should be accessible to people who are old enough to make the conscious decision to wear them in areas where only adults are allowed. Just as Belle Delphine's content should only be accessible by adults, but isn't.

>> No.10296469
File: 559 KB, 582x519, kek.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10296469

They're ugly but honestly the uproar its causing is even more embarrassing lol
Also can people stop doing this shit, it's not any better

>> No.10296717

>>10296469
>nsfw is not okay because think of the children!
>check out my horror hoodie that’s also nsfw
Lol

>> No.10296736

>>10296320
Kids swear all the time and that's just from watching TV or Movies. I think they are capable of making their own choices. Most of them have sex by 14 and don't say "I never did that!"

>> No.10296785

>>10296736
Average virginity loss age is ~17 in the US, so just cause you did it when you were younger than 14 doesn't mean kids most do.

>> No.10296950
File: 68 KB, 960x784, 730.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10296950

>endorsing censoring something harmless
Imagine being soccer moms lol.

I taught myself sex ed in third grade. I knew how things worked before my balls dropped. Some detached ahegao faces rank dead last in the list of things to give a shit about.

>> No.10297129

>>10296785
fuck off the US is full of kids fucking at 15/16 so that's a load of BS there

>> No.10298030

So what about furries? Aren't they not suitable for all ages?

>> No.10298274

Good. I don’t know why we’re splitting hairs over this. It’s cropped porn. Get the fuck over it.

>> No.10299514

>>10296717
the "b-but exposing kids to sexual content" argument is so fucking retarded. ads and media are super sexual 24/7 and kids don't give a fuck. when i was growing up what fucked me up was the scary shit, not the porn tapes i found in my brothers' room

>> No.10299791

>>10294067
Furries who have sex in costumes are a small minority, though. The costumes are very hot, awkward, and expensive.

>> No.10299793

>>10294072
Go back to sucking Vic Mignogna and Nick Rekeita's cocks.

>> No.10299798

>>10294146
It's still the only hentai other than Boku no Pico that most people can name, though.

>> No.10299813

>>10298030
If the costume doesn't have modifications for sex (like a strategically placed hole), then the wearer probably doesn't wear it for sex. The costumes are just too warm, too awkward, and too expensive.

>> No.10299864
File: 4 KB, 137x106, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10299864

>>10299793
>Go back to sucking Vic Mignogna and Nick Rekeita's cocks.

>> No.10300021

>>10299864
Every person who listens to Nick Rekeita like a god types like this guy and uses the same kind of logic this guy does. You can spot these autistic retards from miles away if you know the signs.

>> No.10300026
File: 104 KB, 1080x967, 1544332792377.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10300026

>>10296260

Do kids really know about Belle? She only does lewds.
Now titty streamers on the other hand they make sexual content but hide it behind videogames that kids will watch

>> No.10300157
File: 106 KB, 1297x1242, loadit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10300157

>>10300021
>Every person who listens to Nick Rekeita like a god types like this guy and uses the same kind of logic this guy does. You can spot these autistic retards from miles away if you know the signs.
fuck off with that autism, i dont know who this e-celeb is but since you are so retarded about it im inclined to defend him, you mutts are funny

>> No.10300292

>>10300157
> calling others "retarded" when you don't know what capital letters, apostrophes, or periods are

>> No.10300330

>>10300292
anon im sorry but having PERFECT grammar will not make you less retarded, right now you could be fucking shakespeare i would still be calling you retarded for trying to connect with some literal who eceleb, i actually went out of my way to see who this rick dude is, congratulations you retard

>> No.10301007

>>10293222
This probably became a thing because of trannies pushing the rules