[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 290 KB, 1242x1208, 0F678F19-B97F-43AD-95E1-A0BC86F56040.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930694 No.9930694 [Reply] [Original]

Last thread removed. Keep this one on track and not about your vendettas.

>> No.9930695
File: 483 KB, 1242x1487, 3C8D43E3-5CF6-440E-9BE1-234C05A77935.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930695

>>9930694

>> No.9930697
File: 367 KB, 1242x1094, E33B34FE-B0D0-4BE7-B4A3-21526FBC311F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930697

>>9930695

>> No.9930699
File: 291 KB, 1165x1235, 322C06FB-5BB4-454B-B6F0-D5FB3C6EDCDE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930699

>>9930697

>> No.9930700
File: 310 KB, 1242x753, 23FC2BCB-6F60-4A64-9A39-4E83145BA812.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930700

>>9930699
The more you look, the worse it gets.

>> No.9930701
File: 499 KB, 1242x1523, 7204A05B-5587-4D83-B455-CCE5A8C3F210.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930701

>>9930700

>> No.9930703
File: 471 KB, 1242x903, 47F43F3B-B76D-4BDA-88CB-70F6CC8120D4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930703

>>9930701

>> No.9930704
File: 696 KB, 1242x1545, AF547075-5427-4A20-961D-484FF52E2420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930704

>>9930703

>> No.9930705
File: 444 KB, 1242x1466, C5741D00-2C7F-451A-9AF1-AD792C3996E9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930705

>>9930704

>> No.9930707
File: 385 KB, 1242x1184, A781F131-EAAF-4449-BAEB-611195A8576B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930707

>>9930705
/instagram dump

>> No.9930709

>>9930697
obligatory "cute but not lolita" reply

>> No.9930710

>>9930699
Disgusting makeup, but not ita

>> No.9930711

>>9930703
Oh, this ain’t that b— FUCKING YIKES

>> No.9930717

>>9930699
She needs so much better makeup but i don't think this is ita

>> No.9930724

>>9930709
i think you mean "would be cute but not lolita if her clothes fit"
that dress is busting open at her tits

>> No.9930727

>>9930717
>>9930710
That blouse sleeves with wrist cuffs, the waist scrunching up on her body from poor fit, the shiny wig sitting stupidly on her head. It’s more then makeup anons. It can be improved with some little changes. But there’s too many changes needed to make this work. We can even see the shoes or socks. Or even the petticoat if she’s wearing one.

>> No.9930741

>>9930694
this look kinda cute tho?

>> No.9930771

>>9930694
I want to see this person succeed, but their looks are always off.

>> No.9930795

>>9930704
Odd pose, nosering is debatable and shoes are a bad color, but other than that, rather cute?

>> No.9930797

>>9930700
None of them look superb, like, they are not polished, but so is the average lolita.
What exactly about this screams "ita"??

This thread is full of nit-picks.

>> No.9930814

>>9930797
>nitpicks
Anon, do you have eyes? Can you see?
>>9930694
>>9930695
>>9930697
>>9930707
Because those are breaking all sorts of rules from normie tees to poorly fitted garments and normie shoes. I’ll say many of these can have small things done to improve them, but they are not acceptable to be brought out into public sights had they looked at themselves in the mirror before they left He house.

>> No.9930816

>>9930814
Well the ones you linked are more in the ita territory, but many posts are just plain nitpicks like
>>9930699
>>9930700
>>9930704

>> No.9930827

>>9930699
I don't think the blouse works with the dress - it looks like a normie blouse but with a neck tie, and maybe it could work in Aristo or ouji, but not here. The wig and make-up looks really costume-y and tacky. However, if she wore a more appropriate dress, and had a more subtle eye-make-up look and better wig, this would actually be a nicely balanced coord, and one where all the blingy jewellery works because of the print. She knows how to balance and accessorise, but she strikes me as having spent all her money on the main piece, had to buy a cheap wig and make do with a blouse from her closet.

>> No.9930829

>>9930703
The one in the middle is kinda cute, even if she has got the same blingy cat ears as the others - the dress fits her (actually might be a bit loose in the torso), she's actually wearing a petticoat, and she put a bolero on instead of either entirely bare-armed or wearing a normie stretch lace top. And as she's shorter, the dress is sitting at the right height in comparison to her knees, so short socks doesn't look so bad. This is a perfect example of why 'dressing for your size' is important. And on covering arms, having Lolita appropriate hair that matches the coord, etc.

>> No.9930831

>>9930704
It's an awkward pose, and her shoes don't match, as >>9930795 said, and I agree that it isn't ita. Just needs more petti volume and some black or navy shoes.

>> No.9930832

>>9930700
From left to right:
First one is fine, second one needs to wear either a bonnet OR a veil, not both, and in that light the turquoise looks a bit lurid, middle one has a cute coord, but the headdress looks ridiculous and costumey, bridezilla is bridezilla and that does not look good or balanced on her, one on the far right again needs to tone down the headwear, but is mostly fine, her skirt might be sitting a bit hight on her, however, or her boobs are weird or something? Apart from their mostly headwear OTT disasters, these look fine, except bridezila. Definitely nitpick territory; if three of these girls took their veils off and left the rest of the headgrear, they'd be fine.

>> No.9930848

>>9930701
I'm so tired of all these girls trying to shoehorn swords into coords. I blame idodeclare.

>> No.9930913

>>9930701
Is this the Lolita version of edgelord Goth/Metal dudes who pose with katanas in abandoned buildings?

>> No.9930920

>>9930701
I hate these stupid chain headdresses, they're not lolita whatsoever.

>> No.9930924

>>9930705
Don't girls this ample realize that they look like they're wearing sleepwear when they go out like this?

>> No.9930925

>>9930694
This is why normies think lolita is cosplay.

>> No.9930927

>>9930695
Thematically it's all wrong. Floral skirt with kawaii print shirt with bad tennies with beret? I know people on this thread are giving her a pass but this is mismatched in more ways than one.

>> No.9930929

>>9930697
Cute normie outfit.

>> No.9930931

>>9930699
The only problem I really have is her derp face with the bad makeup. Fix the face.

>> No.9930932

>>9930700
It's like, veils were part of the dress code or something.

>> No.9930933

>>9930701
A sword is not an appropriate accessory for a celestial print unless you're Highlander.

>> No.9930934

>>9930703
I've said it before, and I'll say it again--even if it fits you, lolita dress cuts usually look awful on fatty-chans.

>> No.9930935

>>9930704
>Why don't you come over and see me sometime, big boy

Definitely change the shoes.

>> No.9930936

>>9930707
The cutest part of this pic is the excellent Sadness cosplay. But this coord isn't bad.

>> No.9930950

>>9930695
>>9930927
Probably why she chose this terrible lighting, so hopefully no one would notice how bad it really is

>> No.9930953
File: 252 KB, 730x1095, brolita_2018_photo_section_outside__63__by_kazzei89-dcg02yg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930953

>> No.9930955

>>9930953
Worst. Trap. Ever.

>> No.9930957
File: 404 KB, 849x941, into_the_wood_by_saxartist05-dcfd1u4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930957

>>9930953

>> No.9930958
File: 372 KB, 1024x770, lolita_fashion_1_by_saxartist05-dcfd24t.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930958

>>9930957

>> No.9930959

>>9930957
Where did this dress come from? It's.... eesch, and the pic watermark is making it look weird.

>> No.9930960
File: 271 KB, 848x943, maid_from_above_by_saxartist05-dcfdbuo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930960

>>9930958

>> No.9930962

>>9930701
*blocks your path*

>> No.9930967

>>9930957
>>9930958
>>9930959
My guess is that this is some sort of indie "brand" shoot, since all of the dresses look kind of similar in fabric and technique, who says they're lolita or loliable but really don't understand the rules (that's a low cut with cleavage, which is a no no, and too many bare shoulders). The fabrics are cheap, pastel vomit, and whoever is designing these thinks throwing random pastels together in a dress is okay.

Am I right? What "brand" is it?

>> No.9930968
File: 2.06 MB, 1002x1480, Screen Shot 2018-07-04 at 9.40.41 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930968

this girl literally bought this from pixielocks

>> No.9930972

>>9930968
Oh dear god, change the blouse right now. Holy shit, do they not see themselves?

Skirt is totally adorable, tho

>> No.9930974

>>9930958
Save me from those wigs.

>> No.9930985
File: 486 KB, 1242x1151, 462CE2A0-FBD6-41DB-AA95-8D9C5D71B514.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930985

>>9930936
You either need glasses or this is you to think the coord isn’t bad. Everything needs to be changed except MAYBE. The skirt. It needs a petticoat and her hair doesn’t work for this coordinate. Her forehead is dicteacting and she’s got like no hair accessory going on. Not to mention she looks like that creepy anime fandom Mom that still shops in the Juniors sections of department stores.

>> No.9930999

Found another one that goes with >>9930699
I’m really starting to think that this comm doesn’t know about fundimentals of the fashion. Petticoats seem to be non existent in their community.

>> No.9931001
File: 270 KB, 1101x1222, 212B11F5-2155-403D-A455-5E079E0FCFD1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931001

>>9930999
Dropped image. My bad .

>> No.9931022

>>9930848
i love it when it's done well. not this rusty ass shit

>> No.9931023

>>9930704
usually i think "shoes don't match" is hella nitpick, but jfc this is really bad

>> No.9931036

>>9930707
The Lolita in this really frustrates me because she's so close to looking passable.
If she took her glasses off her head, had a fringe, and braided up her hair, that would be a good start, then simply tucking her shirt into a skirt and having a nicer bag. Letting her hair look all scraggly like that really detracts from this coord. Yeah, her blouse is a normie blouse, but it's loliable for this sort of vintage - meets -classic aesthetic. The other flaw is that she's busting out of that waistcoat. I would really like this as a deliberately 'granny-kei' aesthetic if it had been executed with more attention to the details.

>> No.9931037

>>9931001
As Lolita, this is terrible - as a nice girlie outfit, this is cute.

>> No.9931040

>>9931036 Samefagging, but now I've seen >>9930985 I notice the total lack of petticoat so much more. And WHYYYY the duckface?

>> No.9931075

>>9930701
Clean your sword it's too rusty

>> No.9931094

>>9930959
I'm pretty sure that's the default watermark on Deviantart

>> No.9931099

>>9930967
Like >>9931094 said, this is only the watermark deviantart generates if you want that. You can figure out her account name with this though.

>> No.9931319

>>9930703
Holy fucking bruises on the far right's legs. Cover that shit up, jesus. And get tested for diabetes before your fucking feet fall off.

>> No.9931345

>>9931319
I do fighting sport and don't even get this brushed (and we practice regularly full force without protection on each other to learn to receive hits). What does she do? Makes me almost think there must be abuse, or something must have happened in terms of an accident.

>>9930703
Right dressed bad, and she weights too much and doesn't fit that dress. I do mis legwear and there is a lot more wrong with that outfit. Left one isn't exactly better either (basically same but with no blouse instead of ugly unfitting blouse). Middle one is better, I don't hate it like the outer two, but still not great.

>> No.9931361
File: 182 KB, 773x577, Lolita_20Butterfly_20Printed_20tights_original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931361

>>9931319
>>9931345
I wonder if it might just be stretched out butterfly tights

>> No.9931366
File: 437 KB, 280x668, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931366

>>9931361
I think it are faded, low quality tattoos.

Red looks like it's supposed to be a cat, yellow a cross, purple some white dog face (what artist would make a full white dog face like that. You want a yellow discoloured blob? Because every decent artist knows white colours yellow over time, especially visible on big parts. But then, looks like a crappy artist anyways, and she obviously doesn't use sunscreen to protect those low quality ink from becoming worse.)

>> No.9931370

>>9931345
>>9931361
>>9931366
I'm fucking praying for just grossly stretched tights but...

>> No.9931403
File: 164 KB, 539x960, 36598133_10104504443127150_8947543610698498048_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931403

>> No.9931410

>>9930968
I have this cutsew and it is really not forgiving on anyone who isn't flat as a washboard

>> No.9931412

>>9930958
>watermarking a photo nobody in their right mind would want anyways.

>> No.9931415

>>9931403
good lord, love your boobs more than this

>> No.9931421

>>9930695
If she just wore a normie skater skirt this outfit wouldn't be such an assault on the eyeballs. She has no waist.
>>9930700
The only real issue here is that the garments looks very cheap.
>>9930704
I fucking hate this print, but minus the shoes, this is not ita.
>>9930953
Oh look a fucking sissy.
>>9931403
yet another lady with poor sense of quality.

>> No.9931428
File: 530 KB, 1242x1439, C863FCFE-802F-4A56-9565-94E1FF4014CC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931428

Blue on the right. The others are fine.

>> No.9931453
File: 111 KB, 1080x1350, foxylolita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931453

This was posted by a DDLG chan its tagged as gothic lolita

>> No.9931465
File: 544 KB, 1251x1251, Screenshot_20180704-191208.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931465

>>9930958

>> No.9931474

>>9931366
>>9931361
looks like alice tights? bc there's definitely a mushroom and rabbit on her left leg

>> No.9931478

>>9931474
I don't see a mushroom nor a rabbit, but hard to see picture so I'm gonna assume you're right for the purpose of this comment.

Then why is there a cross on her right leg. Alice has nothing with crosses far as I know.

And why is everything only below her knee, but so blanc above? I never seen tights printed with random images only on the lower part, and if it's stretched it should have images everywhere non the less, just stretched out images.

>> No.9931487
File: 441 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20180704-193826_Google.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931487

>>9931478
>>9931474
>>9931366
>>9931361
It's these tights.

>> No.9931496
File: 355 KB, 1440x957, Screenshot_20180704-194649.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931496

>>9931403
Why the Vulcan hairdo?

>> No.9931506

>>9931487
Thanks for solving the mystery!
Seriously tho, those must be some great quality tights if they don't rip and hold a whole day being so horribly stretched to unreconisability.

>> No.9931509

>>9931506
Apparently they're from Spank

>> No.9931513

>>9930697
To the people saying this is non-lolita cute, have you LOOKED at those buttons? They're screaming for their lives.

>> No.9931517
File: 417 KB, 1440x1034, Screenshot_20180704-200925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931517

>>9930697
>>9931513
Yowch

>> No.9931518
File: 119 KB, 208x196, endmysuffering.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9931518

>>9931465

>> No.9931556
File: 3.09 MB, 1245x2572, D06D8CC4-A867-4628-8903-2ABB32C9053B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Her coords are getting better. But her hair and lack of decent accessories is really bringing her down. What kills me more is the stupid questions she asks in her intasgram posts. “ what’s your favorite way to eat a potate?” First why would you call it a potate? And second, why would you ask that question with a lolita image. This girl confuses me but doesn’t fail to make me shake my head when she’s on my suggested feed.

>> No.9931699

>>9931556
What is going on with her arms and head? If it wasn’t for the shadow I’d swear she’d photoshopped herself onto that background

>> No.9931700

>>9931699
She cranks the photo saturation up to lsd trip levels. She abuses Meitu to its capacity. Be grateful she’s not putting that horrible pastel filter on top of all this.

>> No.9931731

>>9930694
I love how when chubsters attempt ouji, they seem to gravitate towards pumpkin pants and their fat pussies swallow that fabric up like its an all-you-can-eat buffet

>> No.9931732

>>9931403
she and the crew of ita lardos she runs with always smell awfully strong of cat urine

>> No.9931773

>>9931731
best description ever

>> No.9931839

>>9931403
she looks like the type of person who when you meet them, you learn their tumblrgender and obnoxious political opinions before you learn their name

>> No.9931884

>>9931699
Can't tell nothing matches in color if it's filtered hard enough. Too bad she mismatched styles, too

>> No.9931974
File: 830 KB, 1440x841, Screenshot_20180705-100102.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Meanwhile, at the no-petticoat meet...

>> No.9931979
File: 1.60 MB, 1440x1761, 20180705_101153.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

I don't get this coord at all.

>> No.9931983
File: 141 KB, 546x916, E7C6DAD7-9375-4BBE-8A3A-076640BB7E77.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9931974
Why no shoes?

>> No.9931985

>>9931453
Sissies can get body transplants now? I want to stomp on these people while screaming "Lolita was a victim, not a whore!!"

>> No.9931987

>>9931983
No shoes better than whatever black sneakers the girl next to her wears desu

>> No.9931989

>>9931496
What the fuck is going on with that?

>potate
Not quite covfefe, but getting there.

>>9931839
That hair is definitely antigender.

>>9931974
girl on the left accidentally slipped into dad's sneakers? Girl next to her is half naked and can't afford shoes? Girl in green seems pretty pissed about it?

>> No.9931991

>>9930953

This is the kind of ita I'm here for. Absolutely nothing about this looks good.

>> No.9931992

>>9931556
She’s attempting to get more comments so she can pretend she’s efamous and bring some meaning to her sad wannabe existence.

>> No.9932004
File: 68 KB, 960x960, 36534397_2014854108549538_1980331329090224128_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

so much no

>> No.9932006
File: 80 KB, 539x960, 36333872_1731190640261899_7463492273737564160_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.9932009

>>9930741
this looks like a humanoid ketchup bottle. are you blind

>>9930700
nitpicks, but the middle one should honestly not wear flats unless its a medical reason, it squashes her big time

>>9930957
this looks like cosplay

>>9930958
jfc what is this mess

>>9931974
that far right attempt to goth coord a ddc replica

>> No.9932023

>>9931974
Seeing this makes me wish that every legitimate comm would just ban replicas from being worn to meets.

>> No.9932025

>>9930694
fakeboi strikes again

>> No.9932027
File: 606 KB, 1440x1422, 20180705_093252.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9930694

>> No.9932029
File: 939 KB, 1203x1094, 20180705_093722.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9932027

>> No.9932039

>>9931037
The top really doesn’t flatter her at all.
Sorry for your shit taste but this would still be shit for normie fashion even.

>> No.9932041

>>9932029
All that badly coords brand...yikes.

>> No.9932048

>>9931983
no shoes, no blouse, no problem

also that shiny wa ita mess

>> No.9932063

>>9932027
>>9932029
Ok you hate the comm. We get it. Jesus get over it allready. You're so boring.

>> No.9932066

>>9932063
Oh, wow, you think they look good? Is that what you're suggesting? That this is mere comm hate? Sorry you have shit taste and sorry you got posted.

>> No.9932076

>>9932066
Nyart but this is comm hate. This anon was banned from our comm and is now raiding private photos and instas because they don't have access to the comm photos. It's very obvious, and none of their posts are one off itas. They are targeting specific people and when they get bored, just post all the comm members. Also the group pic was a casual jfash meet, not specific to lolita so they can fuck off.

>> No.9932079

>>9932029
How about posting a pic of yourself once in a while to prove how non ita you are compared to the comm?

Everyone is over your boring comm vendetta already. Even the people here who don't know us are sick of you shitting up threads with it.

>> No.9932081

>>9931974
Third and fourth from the left would be cute if they had proper petticoat volume.

I've sometimes worn trainers to meets when I need to walk there, but I'll change into nice shoes once I'm there, wtf is with wearing trainers for the group pic??

>> No.9932084

>>9932029
This was a casual meet-up. Please leave the comm.

>> No.9932085

>>9931403
V-bangs CAN be done nicely with Goth fashion, maybe if really well styled and with suitable rest of hair, with Gothic Lolita.... but this just looks bad. It doesn't go with their outfit, it doesn't flatter their face, it's uneven, and it's awful

>> No.9932087

>>9932066
Im not in any of these photos, nor am I particularly close with any of the girls in these photos, but pretty much what >>9932076 said, this has been going on for a couple weeks and it's boring and obnoxious. To be fair, I feel the same way when ohio or other comms shitpost their itas constantly all over the place for weeks on end. Sorry you hate your comm weather it's AZ, OH, CA/LA, Aus, NYC etc but it's obnoxious and we don't care.

>> No.9932089

>>9932029
Blue wig looks cheap, off the shoulders doesn't flatter the girl with the hat, and long sleeves look weird with the puff-sleeve dress, but other than that, the other girls are just casual, and this is more nitpick/could do with improvement than ita

>> No.9932090

>>9932087
For real, doesn't matter where you are but if you have a problem with everyone in your vicinity, the problem is you and not the group. Screaming about it over and over online just reinforces that.

>> No.9932093

>>9932027
Not ita.
>>9932029
Mostly not ita, but even if it's a casual meet, as is being claimed, there's a lot of inexcusable sloppiness here.

>> No.9932094
File: 797 KB, 503x848, skirt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9931974
is no-shoes chan the one who posted earlier on LFM? Guess she never found a top to go with the skirt?

>> No.9932098

>>9932027
>>9932029
Its getting painfully obvious that this is MM/A and a friend coming for the comm. Just accept that you're banned and your friend will follow if this keeps up.

>> No.9932129

>>9930703
The middle girl looks cute from what I can see, besides the cat ears. I don't know why anyone likes that bodyline dress. It's so ugly.

>>9930953
can i get ur digiiiiits girrrrl

>>9930968
looks fine for someone new, the hairstyle looks nice and the skirt is actually cute. . That cutsew is horrid though.

>>9931556
wow how can you be so blatantly desperate for efame?

>>9932004
needs better lighting.

>> No.9932137

>>9932004
what even is that left pic?

>> No.9932146

>>9932027
She needs better stockings but this is far from ita

>> No.9932160

>>9932027
I know Qi-lolita isn't that common, but how is this ita? At most, I'd say switch the tights and maybe a different hairstyle.

>> No.9932171

>>9930700
At least old school itas are wholesome and endearing. New school OTT results in this vaguely-historically-inspired stuff that doesn’t even feel anything like Lolita. God damn Juliette and Justine.

>> No.9932210

>>9931974
straw-hat-chan, you're the only one who looks redeemable here, but as one chubby to another, throw away those tights. geometric designs don't flatter large legs and your calves are stretching them to the point where they discolor; love yourself enough to get well-made dye sublimated tights that fit

>> No.9932257

>>9932027
This picture is over a year old and honestly it's really sad that you went digging that deep for things to post. Get fucked, nobody likes you A and it's your fault.

>> No.9932259

>>9932098
Not to say we should stoop to her level but can someone please post some pictures of her on here to put her in her place? I don't have any or I would. The few times I saw her at meets she dressed like someone who learned about lolita from Misa in Death Note.

>> No.9932263

>>9932259
I'd rather not fuel her, to be honest.

>> No.9932286

>>9932257
not that anon, but it is slightly ita. if I randomly ran across it, I'd definitely think "wow ita" and have suggestions to make it work.

>> No.9932289

>>9932029
is that milkbox? lmao

>> No.9932326
File: 712 KB, 1050x1543, Screenshot_20180705-163534_Facebook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

What the actual fuck

>> No.9932338

>>9932326
>second post
If this is her second post, what even was her first one? Nudes? This isn't Lolita and looks more like a methhead stripper on the outskirts of Vegas.

>> No.9932345
File: 409 KB, 2048x1544, 36681125_2231263010280968_5471143776476987392_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

I'm so tired of this girl already
>tfw she's french and i'm associated with this garbage

>> No.9932349

>>9932326
i actually love this in a trashy kind of way, but i can guarantee that wherever she posted it, it probably doesn't belong there

>> No.9932352
File: 176 KB, 1191x960, FB_IMG_1530828216480.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9932338
This was her first post. Still garbage.

>> No.9932354

>>9932326
woops,didnt see she was posted already

>>9932338
Nah,she posted that "decora" dumpster fire with the weird ass expressions

>> No.9932377

>>9932326
aw I think this is really cute and fun. wouldn't call it lolita though.

>> No.9932382

>>9932352
I actually like this, although I think this is a rare case where sneakers would have worked better.

>>9932345
is a mess though.

>> No.9932429

>>9930699
Not the best coord and not the prettiest face, but also not ita. Gtfo

>>9930700
>>9930701
also not great but not ita, nitpick-chan, get a life

>> No.9932445
File: 85 KB, 640x480, 5C490818-6CC4-4DC1-BB42-3178F810B331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9932429
Sorry you got posted

>> No.9932447

>>9932259
Well she changed her Facebook name and I never knew her Instagram to begin with. But I’m also not going to stoop to her level of pettiness. All we can do is what we have been doing. Tell her to fuck off every time she posts.

>> No.9932451
File: 601 KB, 1152x2048, 8B7646DA-7C63-4E7D-9DF8-C802C4462331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9932259
Her Facebook has a lot of public images. If she’s going to stoop to the level of digging up old photos. We can. Enjoy.

>> No.9932453
File: 265 KB, 960x959, FEE0F1D3-C335-41C5-B597-19CF319CBA71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9932451
Here have another.

>> No.9932454

>>9932451
>>9932453
This isn't who we're talking about, we're talking about A, you ass.

>> No.9932465

>>9932454
Who the fuck is A?

>> No.9932467

>>9932382
I actually prefer the cowboy hat coord over her first one, I think it works better visually. I don't think either are particularly lolita however.

>>9932345
All the anons who complain about CoF coords being boring, basic and same-y can eat this chick's asshole

>> No.9932478

>>9932171
100% agree. This is not the lolita that I fell in love with, idk wtf this new shit is.

>> No.9932480

>>9932451
>>9932453
Quit trying to detail. This girl is not the shit poster and you know that very well.

Do you really have so little to do this summer that you stoop to raiding the comm members private FB and IG account?

How about you go for a swim in the pool? Go hiking? Maybe actually try and put together a decent coord with your shit wardrobe? Maybe take up a new language, idk, but everyone is so bored and done with you.

>> No.9932483

>>9932465
The girl who got banned, also known as MM. Read the mod sticky.