[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 979 KB, 750x748, E4AEDC5D-C0CF-4FA4-9AA4-483C83A150F2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686591 No.10686591 [Reply] [Original]

Previous thread >>10681396

>> No.10686592
File: 499 KB, 750x747, CD501662-761E-43A1-925C-7C9023751612.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686592

>>10686591
In case “Pink Alice” wasn’t enough, here’s a blue alice lol

>> No.10686594
File: 796 KB, 750x933, 42223E66-0835-4165-9384-293209CB6763.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686594

>>10686592

>> No.10686595
File: 548 KB, 750x1003, E6165FB6-32E6-4DB8-849C-C0D7B4EAEB6D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686595

>>10686594

>> No.10686597
File: 365 KB, 750x583, 39E27216-9610-42AC-81E3-D8EE1225E7E0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686597

>>10686595

>> No.10686598
File: 850 KB, 750x745, F5DC0EF6-7CE6-4707-AE2D-BD578C1D6D57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686598

>>10686597

>> No.10686600
File: 518 KB, 750x928, 00E2F159-E8E5-4BE9-AC61-E98846467534.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686600

>>10686598

>> No.10686601

>>10686595
what the fuck

>> No.10686602
File: 760 KB, 750x767, 8DAB9F7E-0A6A-4945-96F1-F9412E9F6D6E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686602

>>10686600

>> No.10686604
File: 738 KB, 750x747, B55AA5C9-2162-42FE-9F8D-7D64FF66103C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686604

>>10686602

>> No.10686605
File: 549 KB, 750x744, 73FE3960-A0F9-43F4-8A46-25D92AD98CB8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686605

>>10686604

>> No.10686606
File: 890 KB, 750x933, 3EBB7934-A8EB-4084-BD79-FEF033EA7979.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686606

>> No.10686607
File: 560 KB, 750x948, 4D7551E7-AA1D-488C-A83D-5C64F9BC62E1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686607

>> No.10686609
File: 587 KB, 750x824, 35C6A6E4-2C13-4B7A-B5E2-1DB3D6827FFE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686609

>> No.10686610
File: 525 KB, 750x892, 92C17885-6D89-44B3-B665-A3F2E639B85D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686610

>> No.10686611

>>10686595
extremely cursed

>> No.10686617

>>10686607
which dress is this?

>> No.10686619
File: 506 KB, 750x935, 381B5486-1447-43B4-AC10-8250BB720EDC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686619

>> No.10686633
File: 559 KB, 750x928, 7192FFD0-AB6C-42AF-B92F-B4A8906B5365.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686633

Forgot this one -

>> No.10686642

>>10686604
This is cute. Just swap out the socks.

>> No.10686644

>>10686619
This looks so sad

>> No.10686648

>>10686595
Is this in a doctor’s waiting room….?

>> No.10686652

>>10686633
>>10686619
Is this even recent?

>> No.10686654

>>10686652
Yes, one was 2021, other was 2018 lol

>> No.10686720

>>10686592
I kinda like the red petti.

>> No.10686730

>>10686648
it looks like their living room.

>> No.10686821

>>10686633
I wonder what Santa thought of that.

>> No.10686831

>>10686648
It does look eerily like a waiting room especially with that ugly couch, ugly picture, and all those magazines.
If this is their living room I wouldn't doubt that they're a doctor considering the top doctor magazine which creeps me TF out.
Imagine going to see your doc in lolita not knowing he's this creep.

>> No.10686880

>>10686594
diy bottom surgery

>> No.10686893
File: 58 KB, 570x600, 9U0KQsqYJCZa1xqXTToXugK032lIe6a8-33.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10686893

>> No.10686896

>>10686893
This dumbass pouty look on her face make me even more annoyed

>> No.10686930 [DELETED] 

>>10686595
What if this is how normal people view lolitas?

brb quitting this fashion

>> No.10686938

>>10686930
imagine caring about what normies think lmao

>> No.10686946

>>10686880
KEK

>>10686893
looks like a shitty photo shoot by dolls kill

>> No.10686952

>>10686595
i lowkey love these uncanny creepy masks and if they weren't so associated with fetish shit i'd want one

>> No.10687121
File: 200 KB, 720x960, FE1F43C6-3A48-44D3-9CE4-75C21EE03F46.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687121

>> No.10687123

>>10686619
He creeps tf out of me, I would really like to know if he is a pervert or simply dresses badly, but everyone seems to ignore his existence so I guess we will never know.
At least he doesn’t go to meetings.

>> No.10687155

>>10687121
Why bring attention to the fact that you're the size of a cow? Truly baffling

>> No.10687171

>>10687121
idk I think this is a cute concept

>> No.10687184

>>10687121
Do people post fatties here just for the sake of it? This is cute.

>> No.10687214
File: 105 KB, 736x997, a2e383ab872ac9ce08ad533c9365abf0--style-lolita-gothic-lolita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687214

troonlita thread?

>> No.10687216

>>10687184
Yes, all the time, but when you call them out on it, you get a bunch of mental illness nonsense replies, such as
>U mad, fatty
>found the fatty
>seethe more, fatty
>fat is ita
>we're on 4chan, of course we body shame
And variations on those themes. I've seen entire ita threads hijacked for fat shaming before.

>> No.10687221

>>10687171
>>10687184
Sorry you got posted.

>> No.10687223

>>10687216
A lot of people here hate anyone who is slightly overweight.

But that dress is genuinely ugly as fuck.

>> No.10687230

>>10686604
This could be worse, at least compared to the other things posted.

>> No.10687236

>>10687155
It's cute conceptually and that sort of self awareness is fun an amusing.

>> No.10687237

>>10687184
I'm sorry you have no taste anon, that dress looks like a beginner made it from their childhood bedsheets

>> No.10687242

>>10687121
i hate fatlitas but i really like this
nitpick: solid white socks would have been fine here

>> No.10687320

>>10686591
>>10686594
>>10686595
>>10686598
>>10686605
>>10686619
>>10686633
Why do these creeps get into lolita?

>> No.10687327

>>10687320
Multiple reasons. Wanting to be cute, wanting to play out their fetish, getting off to women being disgusted at them, mental illness.

>> No.10687328

>>10687320
>lolita is for everyone
mentality

>> No.10687369
File: 259 KB, 828x1528, FD67EBE2-A6E2-48AD-A13E-D694DC058605.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687369

There is something really gross about holding a giant stuffed bunny while wearing a bondage dress.

>> No.10687378

>>10687369
There are literally stuffed animals in bondage on the dress.

>> No.10687386

>>10687320
Because this hugbox of a community invites them

>> No.10687402

>>10687369
i didnt hate the outfit but the accompanying text was painful to read

"print censored for littol frilly friends under 18 no looky-looky!"

>> No.10687403

>>10687121
This looks like absolute cheap, poorly made shit. Why is anyone defending it??

>> No.10687406
File: 952 KB, 720x725, cAsUaL eRo LoLiTa.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687406

>> No.10687408
File: 1019 KB, 828x1086, 0BC118E7-C2A2-42EE-BAB8-BFAC2CE0E2AB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687408

>> No.10687409

>>10687214
the person on the right's totally out of proportion headwear and weird bedsheet hem frill thing is the most ita part of this pic

>> No.10687433

>>10687214
is this a bodyline replica?

>> No.10687447

>>10686595
low key love the monstera print

>> No.10687479

>>10687433
No that’s the real thing. They just make it look cheaper and uglier than it actually is

>> No.10687493

>>10687402
I hate that rufflechat idiots really acted like wearing this dress was equal to sexual assault

>> No.10687525
File: 82 KB, 720x960, 1631625551526.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687525

>>10687171
>>10687184
>>10687242
The absolute state of this board.

>> No.10687535

>>10687525
Smoothes cankles I've ever seen

>> No.10687607
File: 488 KB, 2320x3088, 32542345345.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687607

>> No.10687608
File: 364 KB, 2320x3088, 32542345346.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687608

>>10687607

>> No.10687609

>>10687607
>>10687608
absolutely cursed

>> No.10687614

>>10687607
>>10687608
what in the fucking hell

>> No.10687625

>>10687607
>>10687608
What in the actual fuck

>> No.10687640

>>10687607
Why did McLovin shave his head?
>Capcha: 8R AGP

>> No.10687643
File: 74 KB, 960x720, FB_IMG_1629419832465.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687643

>>10687607
>>10687608
What the absolute fresh fucking hell.....

>> No.10687650

>>10687608
I think she has alopecia? Or something. Because the hair growth is patchy. I don’t want to judge this kid. She looks some type of sick.

>> No.10687652

>>10687650
does her illness also make her allergic to wigs

>> No.10687654

>>10687650
He has a mustache though???

>> No.10687657

>>10687402
I really hope it wasn't said like that, it sounds very condescending.

>> No.10687660

>>10687650
>>10687654
it's a ftm.. person

>> No.10687664

>>10687660
God she really fucked her whole shit up at such a young age. Sad

>> No.10687675

>>10687657
Nayrt but that’s literally verbatim what they said

>> No.10687686

>>10687184
Especially if they're having fun. Fat people are only allowed to feel shitty about themselves. It's not the best dress, but for a beginner, she's on the right track so she'll improve. I see way worse made all the time.

>> No.10687691

>>10687214
kek, the troon still looks better than the woman

>>10687369
this coord isn't great by any means, but it still looks passable. I'm more bugged by the weird choice of legwear, that looks trashy, rather by the edgy print.

>> No.10687692

>>10687691
edgydesu shit is perma ita shit.

>> No.10687730

>>10687216
4chan is full of sad hateful people and fatties are easy targets cus it's socially acceptable to shit on them.

>> No.10687733
File: 463 KB, 1932x2576, zzu3zp47stt71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687733

>> No.10687734

>>10687730
This is one side, the other side is that half of 4chan is fat and tries to cope with their own self-hatred by shitting on other fat people

>> No.10687741
File: 60 KB, 828x187, E6E9B2EE-7137-46F3-8F7C-AF2078978D71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687741

>>10687657
This dress was posted everywhere when I was a minor lmao like she’s somehow “censoring” it for us when we all know how it looks anyway.

>> No.10687773
File: 840 KB, 2640x1488, F325C4D4-9716-4600-9E55-3473456E6EAC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687773

>> No.10687774
File: 83 KB, 880x721, shook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687774

>>10687773
At first I was like "well this isn't THAT bad except for brows" and then I saw the legs

>> No.10687775

>>10687607
What’s sad is this is so easy to fix. Shave the mustache, shave the eyebrows, do some makeup and put on a wig and she’s good to go

>> No.10687778

>>10687775
>she
oh anon....

>> No.10687803

>>10687778
it is a bio female. ftm

>> No.10687806

>>10687741
>This dress was posted everywhere when I was a minor
So…two months ago? This print is new.

>> No.10687807

>>10687806
Say you’re a newfag without saying you’re a newfag

>> No.10687817

>>10687320
cause they googled “Lolita” looking for something else and came across us by mistake. im not convinced they arent all literal predators.

>> No.10687820 [DELETED] 
File: 992 KB, 1125x1312, D18D8E9A-DB7D-45B6-8DB9-C3FE423EA29D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687820

Why was this the first shit I saw when I open fb.. (yes it’s the same person that keeps posting selfies on the local comm page)

>> No.10687825
File: 1.10 MB, 1020x1041, Screenshot_20211016-144223.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687825

>> No.10687837

>>10687820
>work

>> No.10687838

>>10687837
I've been wondering about this. Her last post said she was going to work looking like this. I'm starting to think she works at a Halloween store which makes me cringe more knowing she's using lolita as a costume like this.

>> No.10687842

>>10687820
>>10687773
The current state of itas in one comm ffs

>> No.10687862

>>10687774
Don't forget the random cat ears when literally nothing in the coord is cat themed

>> No.10687863

>>10687825
>>10687820
Holy fuck can someone get this cringe-lita off my newsfeed? Seriously. What's with the TIKTOK FACIAL EXPRESSION AT THE END?

She's treating lolita like a costume. Plz get her out.

Or better yet, find her TikTok and repost it because I'm getting tired of this shit

>> No.10687865
File: 133 KB, 843x843, 245802193_1218194831997426_188344496333576237_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687865

ffs

>> No.10687892
File: 152 KB, 734x998, xi04vz3t7rw51.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687892

>> No.10687894

>>10687892
I don't even know what to say at this point

>> No.10687900

>>10687865
It's not that awful?

>> No.10687905

>>10687865
Aside from this just looking like some tiktok e-girl wearing lolita, it’s not a bad coord? You’re probably just ugly and bitter

>> No.10687906

>>10687900
her only headwear is scrunchies. she has egirl clown makeup. those cheap shitty socks look terrible. and what even is that .....turtleneck sweater-blouse? she looks like a dollskill mess

what the fuck is with this influx of faggots defending extremely poorly dressed itas? are you standards that low, or would you just not know quality if it slapped you in the face?

>> No.10687920

>>10687320
autogynephilia. these guys are present in all types of female fashion communities, unfortunately

>> No.10687924
File: 630 KB, 977x1071, F1E854B8-6025-46FC-8BF4-47F7F3704BAF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687924

>>10687807
March of this year

>> No.10687926
File: 67 KB, 800x800, FB_IMG_1634449186227.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687926

>> No.10687928

>>10687926
not ita just extremely oldschool and obvs not your taste

>> No.10687946
File: 905 KB, 533x1025, DE88F9C3-FB8D-4526-9B08-531C625827EE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10687946

>> No.10687949

>>10687928
normie tank tops are old school?

>> No.10687951

>>10687949
Stop embarrassing yourself, newfag

>> No.10687952

>>10687949
And backpacks from a toystore

>> No.10687957

>>10687926
the actually coord is whatever, but what really bothers me is the hair. the color + texture makes her look like ronald mcdonald

>> No.10687958

>>10687807
What are you even talking about? It literally came out this year

>> No.10687987

>>10687958
Don't respond to the bait. 4chan is full of hateful gulls who get a kick out of making you feel stupid.

>> No.10688005

>>10687607
i know the girl who sold this exact broken doll dress to this person without knowing...

>> No.10688009

>>10687949
Yup, and btw it’s Jane marple nonnie :)

>> No.10688012

>>10687946
Please, do explain your reasoning for posting this here
I'll wait

>> No.10688014

>>10687803
Oh well, the hormones certainly worked for them

>> No.10688016

>>10688009
Who cares if it's jane marple, it could just as well be from primark

>> No.10688019

>>10688016
nice cope

>> No.10688020

>>10687926
Whenever she tries to go for a fruits look, it just looks so try-hard and falls flat on her. I'm not sure why though, maybe it just doesn't suit her very well?

>> No.10688023

>>10687905
>>10687900
just because the girl looks attractive, does not make the coordinate good. if you seriously think tennis shoes and cheap socks, and a normie sweater+shit aliexpress purse is a good coordinate, then you need to lurk moar you newfag whiteknight

>> No.10688024

>>10687906
my guess is it's the girl coming on here, defending herself.
>>10687905
>>10687900
These both look extremely alike and then >>You’re probably just ugly and bitter

Was them really attempting to jab back at someone on an anonymous board. lmfao.

It's a bad look to come WK yourself.

>> No.10688025

>>10687928
you mean it's not lolita at all. all jfashion =/= lolita, newfags

>> No.10688027

>>10688019
bro bro, I know you weren't around when Fruits was still coming out, but the majority of us only looked at Fruits for lolita. Ya'll are replicating looks that aren't part of lolita fashion and posting it to a lolita community. You better expect we're going to be annoyed.

>> No.10688044

>>10688019
Not even trying, anon. Walk into any normie fashion or thrift store and you're guaranteed to find a similar piece. Oldschool peeps didn't wear head-to-toe brand either, the top just /happens/ to be JM.

>> No.10688060
File: 155 KB, 768x960, 245988791_10224732595876089_270040882552077947_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688060

we out here wearin salopettes hiked up to our pussy and calling it lolita, ya'll

>> No.10688062

>>10688060
Is this not cosplay? They have elf ears, red contacts, a broom, a witch hat, etc.

>> No.10688063

>>10688062
It was in CoF lol I saw this post and cringed

>> No.10688065

>>10688044
>Oldschool peeps didn't wear head-to-toe brand either,
Accurate. We fucking had a hard time finding brand pieces all the time, but even in japan they didn't 100% do brand loyalty like that unless they were AP clones.

>> No.10688071

>>10688060
What’s weird is I looked through (her?) cof history and she was doing alright to start of with but the last few coords have been so ita idk why she’s decided to go down the costume route

>> No.10688117

>>10687926
I think this kind of coord only looks good on someone who’s not trying too hard. Agreed the camisole looks bad, the entire thing looks like a kids costume because it’s too matchy. A plain white lolita blouse would also help a lot, along with a black bag and shoes.

>> No.10688118

>>10687926
Why would she go with a cherry theme when she looks more like strawberry shortcake with that hair

>> No.10688122

>>10688024
I'm not her anon and I'm only one reply

I just don't think it's that awful. Atleast it looks more like real clothes than >>10687892 >>10687825
Costume kind of shit

>>10687865 looks like V with colourful makeup

>> No.10688128

>>10688118
only time that strawberry shortcake nickname from randoms is now actually relevant. lmao

>> No.10688133

>>10687905
this is the ugliest shit ive ever seen. you need help

>>10687946
anon its obvious you hate bittersweet but no one cares. stop posting shit just cause you dont like the style.

>>10687926
its not bad it’s just not really lolita, and its not even very interesting either. not worthy of this much time spent on an edit.

>> No.10688135
File: 32 KB, 425x792, 71iOnsrd11L._AC_SX425_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688135

>>10688128
>>10688118
>>10687926
Really onto something here. Lost opportunity.

>> No.10688148

>>10687946
This is cute anon. Sorry you hate bittersweet to the point that you can't acknowledge when something looks good.

>> No.10688149
File: 53 KB, 750x868, FB_IMG_1621448563144.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688149

>>10688060
Her bodice is wayyyyy too small.....

>> No.10688186

>>10687946
Nitpick. I'm guessing it's "ita" because of the clashing motifs?

>> No.10688189

>>10687892
this looks almost unbelievably bad, there is not a single acceptable element here

>>10687900
are you on crack

>>10687946
i think this one is kinda cute actually, not my favorite but definitely not ita

>>10688060
holy shit that does not fit her AT ALL

>> No.10688193

>>10687403
yall will call anything that isn't brand "cheap looking"
tell us how or gtfo

>> No.10688194

>>10688193
....Are you blind? You need to be told how a children's bedsheet tier plain print dress looks cheap?

>> No.10688195

>>10688194
considering "children's bedsheet" can just be used as an insult for anything you don't like, sure, whatever. I'm blind.

>> No.10688196

>>10688195
nonny....if you aren't trolling and you seriously can't tell that dress is cheap, then yes, you are extremely blind. or at the very least, fucking clueless about quality. lurk moar and try actually buying a brand dress to see the difference.

>> No.10688197

>>10688196
>>10688194
They are probably new, so they don't know what quality looks like. This is common for newfag taobao-litas. It's all over this board, people recc'ing shit brands with bad quality. So it's definitely obvious they aren't worth it to talk to. Print is unique, but poorly executed. But the quality is shit-tier. I get the bed-sheet insult too.

>> No.10688199

>>10688196
>>10688197
lol @ both of you proving my point.

>"if it isnt muh burando then its bad"

>> No.10688201

>>10687926
I miss the doll aesthetic she had going on. She pulled it off like no one else could. The FRUiTS stuff is just ehh

>> No.10688202

>>10688199
That cow dress looks even worse than a lot of taobao. You have no idea what you're talking about and you're making it very obvious if you think that dress looks anything but cheap. And yes, there is a marked difference in quality between the big name brands and most taobao. See >>10685685

>> No.10688204

>>10688202
Taobao halos are literally advertised as DIY. I may be a newfag but Halo-chan right there is even worse.
I know there's a difference between Taobao and brands, dummy. But non-brand doesn't mean bad. Man, brandwhoring really makes your standards ridiculous. I own probably over 20 Taobao dresses and I'd only go as far as to call one of them "bad". The others are either mediocre or good.
Brand is beyond incredible.

>> No.10688205
File: 103 KB, 500x546, 1471373051456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688205

>>10688196
>>10688197
>>10688202
Nayrt but it was handmade. Chill it with your elitism, I bet you can't even sew.

>> No.10688207

>>10688205
getting elitists off this board is like getting all the fish out of the ocean, so eh.
They really do need to be told that anything less than "fucking amazing" isn't automatically crap though, because thats just retarded. Are you gonna stop having microwave mac n cheese after having gourmet just one time? Fuck no, that shit is still good.

>> No.10688208

>>10688207
no it's not good, it's trash. you just need to admit and accept that you like trash. it's okay to do that.

>> No.10688209

>>10688204
>I own probably over 20 Taobao dresses and I'd only go as far as to call one of them "bad".
KEK which ones? do tell

>> No.10688210

>>10688205
>>10688207
>it was handmade crap so it can't be criticized!
this regretsy garbage is a dime a dozen. no wonder it looks even worse than taobao.

>> No.10688213

>>10687607
>>10687608
what gender autsim does to a mfer
looks like she had a mental breakdown

>> No.10688215

>>10688207
>>10688205
>>10688204
u srsly are mad taobao-lita.

Yes, you do need to buy brand to understand brand quality and what you're wasting your money on by buying predominately chinese knock off shit.

Clolita *is not* the JAPANESE lolita fashion that the community was founded on. So take your garbage opinion about handmade trash and leave. "Handmade" shit doesn't look good the majority of the time, in my 10+ years in the lolita comm. Handmade shit comes and goes and even the notable western indie brands have that did "ok." You do understand none of you will make a name and the majority of us have seen such an inflow the entire time that we CAN tell which is shit tier hand-made garbage at this point, right?

Maybe stop white-knighting your shitty fat friends or yourself and save yourself some dignity.

>> No.10688216
File: 377 KB, 1080x1413, Screenshot_20211017-200612_Facebook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688216

>>10687214

>> No.10688235

>>10688215
oh god it's this weeb again. have another reminder that there are more chinese lolitas than any other kind in the world and even the biggest japanese brands prioritize and cater to them. they are the major influencers of the lolita world rn. you need to stop being mad that glorious nippon is no longer the central hub for this hobby and fucking deal with it already

>> No.10688242

>>10688235
that's completely irrelevant. none of what you're saying has to do with garment quality, unless you're suggesting that having the biggest lolita population somehow magically makes their fast fashion crap good. they still make the worst quality shit, which is why chinese lolitas go insane for actual brand releases. the biggest brands are still japanese, because they make the best stuff.

>> No.10688246
File: 234 KB, 792x563, cutie 1993.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688246

>>10687949
>>10688025
>90s CUTiE era lolita doesn't exist because uneducated retards say so

>> No.10688248
File: 240 KB, 792x577, cutie 1993 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688248

>>10688246
>inb4 "that's not lolita!!1"
this is part of the same feature in that magazine

>> No.10688250
File: 218 KB, 792x559, cutie 1993 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688250

>>10688248
the last spread of that feature, for good measure

>> No.10688252

>>10688215
I own brand too, weirdo. If I didn't, I wouldn't be describing it as fucking amazing. Never said a word about hamdmade either. Most of that is crap, but that cow dress honestly just looks like Taobao quality. Which I must repeat, is literally fine. Your view has just been clouded because you've had something better.
But I can enjoy brand and Taobao because I don't let myself get that weird bias.

>> No.10688256

>>10688252
if you think poorly sewn, cheap polyester fast-fashion is "fine" then what do you consider cheap? honest question

>> No.10688258

>>10688256
Do you have a normie wardrobe? congrats, its probably the exact same quality.

Japanese brands are just built differently. I already acknowledged this.

>> No.10688259

>>10688216
I am sick and tired of instagram shoving this fag down my throat. Him and that 600lb lolita with the replicas.

>> No.10688262

>>10688258
>Do you have a normie wardrobe? congrats, its probably the exact same quality.
no I don't wear normie fast fashion. the only cheap quality stuff i wear is fairy kei secondhand, and yes i dislike a lot of it for looking and feeling too cheap. regardless, lolita is NOT about looking and feeling cheap because that makes it appear costumey.

also, that stops making it cheap quality, how? you never answered my question. what do you actually consider cheap if not your poorly sewn, plastic fast fashion?

>> No.10688264

>>10688262
it's still better than normie fast fashion lol

the lolita equivalent of normie fast fashion would be that weird sissy Amazon dress and the creepy K12 shit that Melanie Martinez put out. Not taobao.

>> No.10688266

>>10688264
Nah that's like the wish version
It's even lower than normal fast fashion

>> No.10688267

>>10688266
fucking hell, you mightve got me there

>> No.10688273

>>10688259
Just block them? Then they won't appear in tags you follow or elsewhere afaik.

>> No.10688297

>>10688215
>Yes, you do need to buy brand to understand brand quality and what you're wasting your money on by buying predominately chinese knock off shit.
Not that anon but as a new lolita I by both taobao and AP and don't see much of a difference aside from the first taobao dress I bought that was obviously cheaply made. Maybe I should try a different JP brand? I'm thinking about meta.

>> No.10688298

>>10688297
what taobao dresses do you have, and what ap dresses do you have?

>> No.10688363
File: 661 KB, 750x1000, 345408123d92e843d5a37658a2d99499_10 (2)-750x1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688363

>>10688298
AP
>Nostalgic lady jsk
>Space Lolipop jsk
>I can't remember the name of it but it looks like Holy Rosary in sax jsk

Taobao
>Strawberry and Sakura by Forest Wardrobe pic related
>The Fire Signs by Arcadian Deer
>Beauty and the Beast by Soufflesong
And like 4 others I don't remember the names of one of them being a "hanfu"-like dress.

>> No.10688370

>>10688246
>sees cutie magazine scans for the first time and thinks they're all-knowing
nta, but no one is denying or even taking about early 90s lolita, retard. her coord looks like a bad attempt at late 90s fruits.

>> No.10688372

>>10688370
She’s obviously going for early lolita judging by her tank top.

>> No.10688374

>>10688372
never said otherwise

>> No.10688378

>>10686604
This is literally fine, bad sock choice but fine

>> No.10688381

>>10687774
The brows scare me more than the legs desu

>> No.10688383

>>10688370
Some retard actually saw a jane marple top and asked if “normie tank tops” were old school. So yes, the history lesson was warranted regardless of whatever the fuck shes wearing

>> No.10688384

>>10688383
Then post relevant cami lolita coord examples

>> No.10688393

>>10687946
The witch hat kind of throws the coord off a little bit but overall not ita. Imo it'd be cuter if she'd gone with black flowers in her hair or something still witchy but less on the nose.

>> No.10688394

>>10687946
Are you mad because she wears this print with bears dry humping limes and think it's the same level as this : >>10687369 ?

>> No.10688409
File: 614 KB, 1080x1348, Screenshot_20211018-131146_Instagram.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688409

>> No.10688435
File: 514 KB, 1693x3502, wn0edzggb7u71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688435

All black ouji/kodona outfit

>> No.10688484

>>10687946
Not ita. Super cute... Maybe the bunny ear socks don't match the bears. But that's suck a tiny nitpick and doesn't make this ita at all.

>> No.10688495

>>10687946
You posted this to rile people up right? I guess it worked.

>> No.10688499

i really hope she doesn't come to any of our meets.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8rjL5jF/

>> No.10688504
File: 196 KB, 300x544, delete.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688504

>>10688499
Because anon didn't supply screenshots, here you go.

>> No.10688507
File: 1.25 MB, 268x230, 7d63ba68f9eee22b96c5a9d906a33c63.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688507

>>10688435

>> No.10688514
File: 22 KB, 300x228, anime-egl-memes-8thegreats-world-39993891-300-228.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688514

>>10688499
She's planning on going to the ild tea party

>> No.10688518

>>10688504
Did she do that to her teeth on purpose or do they just look like… that?

>> No.10688524

>>10688499
Pretty sure the dress is replica

>> No.10688545

>>10688499
yo I knew it. thx for stalking down that tik tok. shit's cringe.

>>10688514
organizer said it was first come first serve for when the list is actually open to apply.

>> No.10688549

>>10688524
She's a budget cosplayer, of course it is

>> No.10688551

>>10688504
100% only wearing lolita as a costume. WHY IS SHE TRYING TO BE IN OUR COMMUNITY AS A UNDEAD DOLLY FOR HALLOWEEN? WHAT?? go somewhere else.

>> No.10688555

>>10688363
>Soufflesong is the same quality as AP
Good one

>> No.10688556

>>10688555
These clolitas are so deluded.

>> No.10688563

>>10688545
Yep I saw. Hopefully it sells out before she can get in since her daddy is buying her the tickets kek.

>> No.10688564

>>10688563
What comm’s ILD?

>> No.10688624

>>10688297
There's gonna be variance between releases, but you really do need to see a fairly large variety of dresses in person between the different brands to gain a deeper understanding of quality difference. I don't think there's any other way of gaining that experience, because close up shots aren't the same as actually feeling and comparing materials in person along with understanding suitable cuts for your body type, longevity of materials, details of trim, washability, etc.

>> No.10688634

>>10688555
What's the difference? This is not to be a smart ass, I genuinely can't tell and it would be great to know what to look for.

>> No.10688636

>>10688624
Wait, I see this one was addressed to me as well. I'm on a different device so I didn't see the (you)s.

>> No.10688637

>>10688634
anon, just go to BSoLF or Rufflechat or ask a friend. if your knowledge of lolita is truly so limited that you need to ask this, please get off cgl and learn some more.

>> No.10688659

>>10688555
nayrt but the only difference I feel in quality between my newer AP and Soufflé Song is generally on the lace. Soufflé Song has been going down steadily in quality though, but so has AP. Of course it still can’t compare to my pre-2013 AP, but neither can new AP.

They used to be nice filler pieces imho but I wouldn’t buy from them now with how many people they’ve fucked over with shit quality in the past year or so.

>> No.10688869

>>10688637
Ew facbook

>> No.10688874

>>10688659
I bought from soufflé song before and even the cheapest feeling poly AP was miles ahead of the nicest of soufflé song's pieces. Taobao is a fine option for people but not all shops are that good and definitely not all are brand quality.

>> No.10688881
File: 125 KB, 966x1694, 188908.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10688881

found on vinted

>> No.10688907

>>10688634
Oh you poor thing, summer is over and you're embarrassing yourself.

>> No.10688941

>>10688907
covid summer never ended

>> No.10689074 [DELETED] 
File: 32 KB, 623x253, lolitacosplay.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689074

>>10688504
>https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8rjL5jF/
>>10688563
>>10688551

Damn she threw a shit fit on the local community page. So many sympathizers for someone admitting to wearing lolita as a costume, purely. Why? Seriously. I didn't even post this chick, but you guys that are defending someone "cosplaying lolita" are cringe as fuck.

>> No.10689075

>>10689074
Why is she spamming photos of herself in costumes to a lolita community? That's pretty offensive.

>> No.10689081

>>10689074
Yep thought the same thing. Lolita isn't a costume. I hope she learns from this experience but based off the enablers and people crying about muh cyber bullying I doubt she will. Maybe she'll stay away from events but all the itas in the comm will coddle her and continue to promise it's a *~safe space~*

>> No.10689086

>>10689074
>>10689075
>>10689081

It seems like as cringe as she is, she did say that she never claimed it was lolita. Why waste time on someone who isn't in the community or trying to be?

>> No.10689088

>>10689086
Her tags on tiktok are #lolitafashion, so that's not true at all.

>> No.10689089

>>10689088
Damn well in that case have at it. She should know not to lie when there are receipts.

>> No.10689090

>>10689088
lmao so she's just lying. so fucking weird

>> No.10689091

>>10689086
Even if she hadn't tagged things as lolita she posted her "coords" directly to the local lolita comm which is an obvious implication that it's supposed to be lolita.

>> No.10689093

>>10689074
I'm sorry, who the fuck's dad gifts them dresses like this?

>> No.10689096

>>10689093
That's not abnormal if your dad already knows you are into the fashion.

>> No.10689097

>>10689096
but she isn't and claims not to be.....

>> No.10689103

>>10689097
If she isn't in the fashion why is she posting on lolita groups, saying she's trying to get better pieces, and tagging as lolita

>> No.10689104

>>10689103
Yes, that's my point. Congrats on not following the conversation

>> No.10689106

>>10687607
Is that a bald Dreamy Tabby?

>> No.10689110

>>10689104
Sarcasm doesn't carry well over the internet. You just look like you're a WK when you post like that.

>> No.10689116

>>10689110
True. Hey fellow sea-gulls.

There's really been an influx of tiktok ita special snowflakes in our community. It's a large community, but you really can't let these people backpedal and lie to people like this and already recognizing that they are wearing it as a costume. No one likes their newsfeed being spammed.

>> No.10689125

>>10689116
This. The fact people are defending her even though she admitted she's wearing it as a costume is fucking embarrassing.

>> No.10689130

>>10689116
I agree I just wish there was an effective way of keeping them out. There's so many of them they just enable each other and call anyone who doesn't want to put up with their bs a bully because they're just trying to have fun!!!

>> No.10689131 [DELETED] 

so it’s a lolita inspired cosplay for Halloween. I don’t see a problem with using the lolita tag for it since technically it’s related but it’s just a costume not really a co ord. It’s like dressing up as a sexy nurse for Halloween. you’re not really a nurse but you would use the sexy nurse tag to help your vid/pic reach people.

>> No.10689132
File: 129 KB, 1032x1198, FB_IMG_1634692176153.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689132

I straight up thought her "apron" was one of those Halloween lamp shades

>> No.10689133

>>10689131
please shut the fuck up

>> No.10689134

>>10689131
Christ soup we all know you have brain rot but stop interjecting and forcing yourself into conversations when you can't even follow what people are saying and know nothing about lolita to boot

>> No.10689136

>>10689131
>>10689133
>>10689134
pls excuse the soup tag. I was just pretending to be him earlier. I’m a legit lolita for 4 years now.

>> No.10689138

>>10689131
a costume of WHAT? it's not a costume of a lolita, obviously, since she doesn't pass as one. so why would she post it to a lolita page? it has nothing to do with lolita.

no one dressing up as a sexy nurse for halloween posts it to actual nursing groups so your metaphor falls apart

>> No.10689140

>>10689138
I mean it’s a replica of an actual brando. I don’t know the exact make and model but other gulls have already pointed it out. so it’s not lolita but a lolita costume cause it’s not real brando. it’s for a TikTok not really an exclusive club/page like CoF or even here. she used the tags because it’s semi related to lolita but again not an actual lolita co ord just a costume.

>> No.10689143

>>10689136
Please just shut the fuck up already. Even if you aren't soup you're just as annoying and brain dead.

>> No.10689144

>>10689140
wrong. she DID post it to a lolita fashion page on FB. and no, tagging something #lolitafashion doesn't make any fucking sense if she goes and says "hurr durr but i wasn't telling anyone it was lolita!".

and no, there is no such thing as a "lolita costume" because that would just be....wearing lolita. nurse costumes are obviously costumes because being a nurse is not a fashion. and if it is supposed to be a "lolita costume" then she did a shit tier job of looking like a lolita, which is worthy of ridicule.

sorry you got posted now fuck off.

>> No.10689145

>>10689143
are you okay anon? I feel like this anger of your stem far from just some TikToker using the lolita tag for her lolita inspired costume. If you have some issues you need to vent the feels thread is there for you. It’s a judgement free zone. we’re all gulls in jsks here and we’re here for you

>> No.10689146

>>10689132
what a nitpick

>> No.10689147

>>10689145
This reeks of soup

>> No.10689148

>>10689146
it's an ugly coord nonnie. maybe not necessarily ita but this is some taobao fuckery

>> No.10689149

>>10689144
I feel like some of the idiots from the Seattle comm are flood in here to actually white knight this girl.

Seriously. You guys are actually going to white knight an straight class COSPLAY ita? This is what the lolita community has actually come to at this point? You fucks are jokes.

>> No.10689150

>>10689148
There are so many other bad posts to pick on, of all the posts. You're just vendetta posting at this point.

>> No.10689151
File: 189 KB, 706x1280, 61D9EB65-3642-4605-91AF-B4D34A970B5E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689151

>>10689144
I mean if she has DID and one of her personalities posted it to FB you can’t really fault her…
> there is no such thing as a "lolita costume"
>picrel
>Inb4 ew it’s lovely lor
shut up lovely lor is gospel to us truelitas

>> No.10689154

>>10689151
I don't think anon was claiming she has DID. anon just sounds like they are on 4chan and underaged.

>> No.10689158
File: 424 KB, 2048x1536, 244622277_388380939587835_378271837849773023_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689158

>> No.10689159
File: 86 KB, 960x960, 245688291_5058828217479024_9096658221340074414_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689159

>> No.10689160
File: 59 KB, 502x960, 245920511_10159727568134312_8356222688221384143_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689160

>> No.10689161

>>10689140
> make and model
this has to be bait

>> No.10689162

>>10689151
>if she has DID and one of her personalities posted it to FB
no one is saying she has DID. learn to read.

>video of lolitas reacting in horror
exactly why it's unsurprising that people are making fun of her. this doesn't help your argument.

>lovely lor is gospel to us truelitas
ok, this is an absolute troll. there's no other possible explanation. this has to be soup.

>> No.10689163

>>10689147
you kinda smell
like a soup
clam chowder
>>10689154
>wrong. she DID post it to a lolita fashion page on FB.

>> No.10689164

>>10689158
i actually really liked this but i initially thought it was supposed to be fairy kei.

>> No.10689165

>>10689164
nah it's trash + she's a trash human

>> No.10689167

>>10689163
how the fuck does
>she Dissociative Identity Disorder post it
make more sense to you instead of reading it as
>she did post it

>> No.10689168

>>10689167
Jesus christ you guys going back and forth are making me realize more and more the Seattle community is full of idiots.

>> No.10689170

>>10689168
This. It's clearly bait, retards, or both

>> No.10689171

>>10689161
how else would you describe an unknown jsk? that's how we describe it back in the old days when I started lolita and was looking for jsks on LM.
>>10689162
Tyler Willis stans need to stfu!
>>10689167
why was it all caps then? it's 4chan posting style kinda like saying "I was going to make an intelligent post but I autism it."

>> No.10689172

>>10689170
Who the fuck even defends this retarded girl's backpedaling?

>> No.10689173
File: 4 KB, 628x61, this many.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689173

>>10689172
Apparently

>> No.10689177
File: 55 KB, 625x626, 1559079508872.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689177

>>10689171

>> No.10689178
File: 880 KB, 1875x1500, 246877427_4803588683008354_806835793124173166_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689178

>> No.10689180

>>10689151
What the fuck are you talking about lmao

>> No.10689181
File: 23 KB, 400x299, 1559120627206.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689181

>>10689173
and I assume the comments are babying her so that everyone can pretend that they're not a 4chan meanie?

>> No.10689184

>>10689181
Oh yeah. Definitely. The admin told her to toughen up essentially tho, despite everyone whining and crying about big bad meanies on the internet that exist everywhere.

>> No.10689189
File: 189 KB, 843x1498, 245657418_10223847850196938_7853169678797440657_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689189

>> No.10689193

>>10687607
Call me crazy but I actually like what's going on here

>> No.10689195

>>10689178
kinda shitty to post from a small closed comm group, anon

>> No.10689196

>>10689150
Sorry you got posted

>> No.10689199

>>10689195
nta but that image is in the CoF thread already

>> No.10689200

>>10689195
This was on cof dumbass
Even if it wasn't this is the ita thread no one cares

>> No.10689202

>>10689196
You really need your glasses don't you.

>> No.10689269

>>10689178
I like the idea, not so much the execution... Perhaps some pops of blue and yellow in replaced items would make this passable.

The little plush friend is cute though. I like him. He looks polite. 10/10 would add to my corgi collection.

>> No.10689293

>>10687607
>>10687608
Got aids just by looking at this shit

>> No.10689298

>>10689269
>doesn’t even mention the hat or hair
If you’re this bad at the fashion, you shouldn’t be trying to give others advice.

>> No.10689306

>>10689159
This is honestly so ugly but I can't put a finger on why. Maybe it's the grody wig, maybe it's the panty-like mask.

>> No.10689322

>>10689180
don’t lmao. you can lol but lmao is unrefined and not smthin a proper lolita would say.

>> No.10689328

>>10689306
lingerie mask + jacket + the overdone pearls. not to mention the grandma hands

>> No.10689332

>>10689189
Gotta censor those little piggies so no foot fetishist will explode at the sheer sight of them

>> No.10689384

>>10689298
who gives full concrit in the ita thread retard? why would I mention the obvious? jesus christ the state of this board

>> No.10689398

if you think the seattle fb group is full of itas then leave and make your own circlejerk private group lmao yall embarrassing yourselves...........

>> No.10689399

>>10689398
Or you can post them here because it’s hilarious content. Sorry you got posted

>> No.10689401

>>10689398
welcome to the lolita community. u new here huh. seattle has never been an exception from the lolita culture.

dunno why I am responding to a 1 and done bitch post

>> No.10689403

>>10689401
This post is way too manufactured lol

>> No.10689404

>>10687214
Are you mad that you look worse than the transwoman in your selfpost?

>> No.10689405

>>10687920
AGP doesnt exist. Go home /pol/.

>> No.10689406

>>10689403
shrug. it's really ignorant to whine and bitch and not have thick skin if you post in the lolita communities.

>> No.10689411
File: 8 KB, 224x225, 998D0AE0-7CFD-447B-A0E9-455F7964C5FC.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689411

>>10689405

>> No.10689418

>>10689401
nah not new just think it's hilarious and sad that this sort of attitude still exists. it's 2021 sweaty

>> No.10689428

>>10689398
Sorry you're ita and can't handle facing the reality that most of the comm cringes when they see you.

>> No.10689435

>>10689428
stop going into our space if you're not from here. we take care of our own and dont throw them under the bus over here unlike calitas

>> No.10689436

>>10689435
Well obviously you do if someone posted her here from your group

>> No.10689437

Smells like some troons slipped into this thread butthurt.

>> No.10689438

>>10689436
it was someone that wasnt from seattle that got an invite from a friend. that person has been dealt with. so stay out of our shit before we roll up across state lines with our crew and fuck you bitches up

>> No.10689439

>>10689438
KEK are you trolling or are you serious? That’s a hilariously empty threat that intimidates absolutely no one. Do it!

>> No.10689440

>>10689437
When are they never but hurt about something. They are always fucking up everything with their whining instead of shutting the fuck up. Bunch of losers.

>> No.10689442

>>10689439
yeah keep talkin the talk but when we roll up in our pink mary kay cadi with AP wrap you'll be walkin the walk.

>> No.10689443
File: 3.71 MB, 498x280, dio-jojo.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689443

>>10689438
>before we roll up across state lines with our crew and fuck you bitches up

>> No.10689446

>>10689435
>stop going into our space if you're not from here
wtf are you even talking about lmao multiple people from seattle were the ones posting here

>>10689438
kek you're clearly delusional and have no idea what you're even talking about

>> No.10689448

>>10689435
>we take care of our own and dont throw them under the bus
Well that explains why it was Seattle comm members posting her here then. What a joke.

>> No.10689450

>>10689443
>>10689446
>>10689448
Jessica here (I go by Jess or Jesse) Halloween costume girl is not part of the seattle lolita comm. that's why she was posted because she made a mockery out of our hobby. Jesse out

>> No.10689451

>>10689450
girl.........why are you posting your name here

>> No.10689452

>>10689451
Nayrt but literally who cares? Everyone goes on here occasionally. Also I seriously doubt that person is actually whoever the fuck Jess is, unless they’re trying to get her in trouble

>> No.10689455

>>10689438
Imagine being this sad. The mods said that the reality is if you post online, these things happen and that they aren't looking to isolate people.

The majority of you woke-cunts are so power hungry you're trying to make decisions for mods, with little to no power and capability.

That's pretty pathetic, isn't it? Must feel real bad being so helpless but grabbing for power desperately.

>> No.10689456

>>10689450
>she was posted because she made a mockery out of our hobby
Accurate. I didn't post her, I'm from the Seattle community and I support people in the decision that they were insulted by her "cosplaying" lolita and spamming our newsfeeds with trash. She wanted attention, she got it.

>> No.10689457

>>10689450
quit lying. she's in the seattle comm and her page says she's from seattle not cali.

>> No.10689458

>>10689435
>>10689438
I'm just saying, but I know people in the community that has moved or often comes up for visits. I don't think it's valid to just remove people for being in other comms or locations and make assumptions around that. NGL you sound nuts. How is your schizo paranoia treating you?

>> No.10689459

>>10689457
You can be from Seattle and not be in thr comm. Joining a FB group doesnt mean you actually go to meets or do anything

>> No.10689463

>>10689459
And? She was posting in the comm which means she's obviously a member as well as the fact that she stated she was planning on going to meets. Quit being pedantic.

>> No.10689464

>>10689456
i support you never going to seattle comm events if you have that sort of attitude towards a 15 yr old lol you're pathetic

>> No.10689466

>>10689463
Planning on going to meets? Lmao that’s not being part of a comm. And since they posted her, they obviously don’t want her to start going

>> No.10689477

>>10689464
People can lie about ages on the internet. You're honestly the pathetic one here, so desperate for power over other people.

>> No.10689478

>>10689466
>>10689463
Yes. She marked that she was going to an upcoming meet. These anons are fully falling for back pedaling and someone lying

>> No.10689492

How much you want to bet that the anon that posted ita-chan to this thread also was the one to message her on instagram? lmao. I find it hilarious that anyone outs themselves that blatantly for going to cgl and just tries to hide it. Great cover, anon.

>> No.10689495

This board has become such a hugfest. How are there Seattle bitches here defending someone who wore lolita as a costume to a customer-facing job? We all know cgl is full of socially maladjusted, mentally ill lolitas who have spending addictions and visit for shits and giggles. If you’re coming here looking for a serious debate, you’ve reached a level of mentally ill that can’t be treated. Stop wasting your time and whiteknight somewhere else

>> No.10689500
File: 332 KB, 1080x1438, FB6ACB27-6FF5-4573-A4CD-7829A98F09C7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689500

Anyway over in Australia <3

>> No.10689544

>>10689500
This has to be a troll

>> No.10689634
File: 1.55 MB, 1020x1064, Screenshot_20211020-191408.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10689634

>>10689500
Itas sure love this dress.

>> No.10689651

太って着れなくなり泣く泣く出品します

>> No.10689735

>>10689500
>lolita cosplay
that's all you need to know

>> No.10689920

>>10688881
holy shit, this takes the cake

>> No.10690282

>>10689189
this is an insult, can they at least try

>> No.10690384

>>10689328
holy shit I never noticed them, but now I can't unsee them

>> No.10690497

>>10689634
thought the one on the right was k8 kek

>> No.10690945
File: 821 KB, 1076x1446, Screenshot_20211025-094117_Facebook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10690945

...

>> No.10690994

>>10690945
there's another thread already where this is the main pic

>> No.10693166

>>10689159
it's the skeleton hand for me jfc

>> No.10693186

>>10693166
I also have skeleton hands (not that bad though) but always called them old lady hands. I'm gonna start calling them skeleton hands now. That's so much better.