/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>10581018

>>10581019

>>10581018
Nico nico niii

>>10581021
It clearly says fairykei not Lolita

>>10581023
Ita thread is for any j fash

>>10581032
fucking newfags. no it isn't.

>>10581033
It's you who is newfag, j fashion other than lolita used to be posted here

>>10581032
Since when does ita mean bad coords in fairy kei/himekaji/vkei??

>>10581038
Since ita means painful (to look at)

>>10581032
Nah

>>10581033
>>10581038
>>10581052
we've often had other jfash in ita threads.

>>10581019
is that one of those 'chamberofpastels' dresses? I feel like everything they make is so frumpy when its actually being worn

>>10581053
Only because they were trying to claim it was lolita.

Ita threads = only lolita failures

>>10581573
Oh damn, is this recent? Looks like 2008 Milanoo, I love it

>>10581195
Dude they are so so tacky and I don't understand how they are so popular!

>>10581593

It might be handmade as far as I can tell.

>>10581577
Nyart but I also remember having seen other jfash posted without it being claimed as lolita. It's been a few years since tho.

>>10581614
https://m.milanoo.com/product/cotton-black-and-white-lace-ruffles-cotton-gothic-lolita-dress-p12873.html
Nah that anon is right. I'm sad to say that the old photo of the fat girl wearing it without ironing it can't be removed from my eyeballs, it burned right into them. This dress was too popular back in the Milanoo days. Even the stock photo looked bad.

>>10581593
I wanna know too! Oh how long it's been since the Milanoo itas, I'm ready for their comeback.

>>10581650
Holy shit the saggy “lacing” on the front

Also the beautiful unironic weeb talk. Screenshot from the review section of said dress.

>>10581650
You can tell by this girl's facial expression that deep down she knows she dun goofed.

>>10581562
This was made from the glb pattern for some Kana dress. I only know because I made the same one, but I actually added more volume to the skirt to actually make it the correct amount of poof for Lolita.

>>10581679
I usually like his coords by dear lord does he need to work on posing and facial expressions

>>10581719
Yeah, his coords are good (usually) but his posing looks off everytime

>>10581679
If he didn't look directly at the camera, and didn't do a weird marionette pose, this would look way better.

>>10581679
This picture prompts my fight or flight response (the latter for me)

>>10581032
>tfw OP of ita thread is ita

>>10581679

>>10581747

>>10581748

>>10581749

>>10581748
>>10581749
does she live at a hostel or something? wtf is with the bunkbeds

>>10581750

>>10581752
>I didn't know they sold em on amazon

>>10581753

>>10581754

>>10581755

>>10581764

>>10581766

>>10581734
That outfit would also look a lot better if it wasn't on an ugly old man.

>>10581767
cute bait

>>10581767
is this voldie?

>>10581775
Newfag here, I don't know who this is? I saw her on Instagram

>>10581782
Ok selfpost

>>10581782
>Newfag here
this is why you shouldn't post to the ita thread

>>10581783
You fell for it!

>>10581754
Nothing wrong with either of these

>>10581679
I agree I do like his coords and I don’t think this coord is ita but it sure is scary as hell

>>10581751
It’s a college/uni dormitory I’m sure

>>10581797
Looks like her lacefront be slippin

>>10581753
A literal child? Wtf anon

>>10581748
All that acne on her forehead and she still chooses to pull her hair back in a toddler pigtail instead of having bangs?

>>10581752
Iunno this one seems alright. The socks and headwear don't work and I'd ditch the shoehorned gold shoes, but this could be a LOT worse.

>>10581754
Girl on the right needs headwear and both could use accessories because the coords are rather plain, but they hardly belong in the ita thread and I'm fairly sure the dabbing is the only reason you posted them.

>>10581800
What the fuck kind of college dorm makes you sleep on bunks like that like some kind of summer camp?

>>10581827
Lots of colleges have inexpensive dorm options like that, especially state ones.

>>10581018
NIGGERS NIGGERS BRAP BRAP

>>10581752
How is this ita? I wouldn't even call it a nipick. Basic and boring sure, but cute imo.

>>10581859
agreed. Boring not ita.

>>10581861
>>10581859
If y'all can defend one ita, not sure why you wouldn't defend more than her. Stop favoritising just because of skin color, racists

>>10581719
>>10581723
>>10581734

For context this photo is from one of those weekly-coord challenges and the prompt was porcelain Victorian doll or something close to that. Hence, the weird posing.

>>10581868
It's not how a doll would pose and is still creepy as fuck

>>10581754
these are fine

>>10581767
This is also fine. Damn op, this was a shitty dump

>>10581865
Weak bait

>>10581752
Literally a nitpick. Quit posting okay coords with gold shoes just because you hate the shoes.

>>10581679
Not sure if it's the post or just the fit, but he looks like he's about to burst out of that dress as soon as he moves his arms in a normal position.

>>10581753
Urch the horrors of And Romeo replicas never ends. I actually like And Romeo but their designs are kinda having a complex balance in a way that just works, but get a few tiny details different and it looks like a eBay ita mess right away. They are probably some of the worst to make a cheap knock-off from, yet replica people love them for some reason.

>>10581766
Dress looks a bit too small but otherwise the coord is fine, not ita. What I wonder more is why she decided to put that front picture up front. It's so unflattering. While the two in the back look much better. Would have been better if she just posted one of those (without the bad photoshop background).

>>10581766
A bigger/longer dress and some socks would do this a million favors.

>>10581919
Girl clearly needs an underskirt since when is showing so much leg okey

>>10581922
I agree on the longer dress, but she's wearing pink tights. Replacing those with socks would be fine, but casually I don't mind plain tights. Wouldn't just ad socks on top of the tights tho.

>>10581922
She's showing that because the dress is too small in the length, which I said was an issue. "Otherwise" means beside what was just named smartass.

This destroyed me

>>10581922
Sorry >>10581929 was aimed at >>10581926 not you.

>>10581930
Oh honey no

>>10581928
It's probably the lighting or the dumb edit, but that colour of tights looks flesh toned. It adds to making the dress look shorter, she might've been able to get away with it a bit more if she had on socks or different coloured tights.

Honestly she just needs to scrap that dress altogether though, it looks way too tight across her chest on top of how short it is.

>>10581941
>bondage furry rabbit tits
ugh

>>10581941
dont show this to the e-girls

>>10581944
damn youre really grasping at straws to see that

>>10581941
ugly ita dress but not nearly as PrObLemATic as the pure and virginal little Americans on RC are trying to make out

>>10581941
Fugly

>>10581941
The colour scheme is the only appealing thing about this godforsaken garment

>>10581930
>standing on the bathtub
Just get a full length mirror jesus

>>10581949
>>10581941
Disgusting

>>10581955
the rabbit has tits, anon.

>>10581941
Ugly dress but I agree with >>10581955 it's not really that problematic. Everyone shouting in RC how horrible this print is for having a BDSM plushies print clearly haven't been in lolita that long or have kept hidden in their little save spaces. It's not the first nor the worst print with a theme related to "kink" or other "taboo" themes, and I'm feeling it's more an aesthetic thing to the designers than really a kink of them. Just like many "non-taboo" themes are taken soley for aesthetics without further deep meaning or intention, like religious prints. They just like how it looks and that's it. It is the most ita design I've seen having it tho. It looks like one of those 30 dollar TaoBao fast fashion dresses.

>>10582011
anon, the exact issue with the dress is that it's literal kink and not aesthetic. this exact type of sexualizing stuff for children is fucking perverse unlike bondage harnesses or lite things like that.

>>10581941
Not gonna lie, the design of this somewhat reminds me of maxicimam dresses. Which the majority are pretty fucking ita anyways..

Between the apparent fire happening in the foreground, party city bunny ears, and the weird buckets in the background... I have a lot of questions.

>>10582052
I keep staring at her socks what is up with them?

>>10581996
ayrt here: have you considered this thing called PERSPECTIVE? Like, who gives a flying fuck if there’s a furry cartoon rabbit with tits? people on RC are saying this violates consent/is paedophilic if you wear it out/is a comm-bannable offense and I’m just like...... this is an alt-fashion. you’re losing your shit over cartoon bunnies doing bondage..... the problem is you

>>10582067
>ahegao lolita
This is the worst thing I've ever seen

>>10582067
Her tits are all seeing anon
All she sees is hentai though

>>10581930
bottom left exudes chaotic energy

>>10582067
Man. Ahegao is banned from all cons. There's seriously nothing aesthetic about these all over prints. I wish people would get the message.

>>10582025

I wish people who cannot handle subversiveness in fashion would go back to wearing capris and target t-shirts. Literally what status quo are you upholding.

Bondage bunnies/bears are everywhere in jfashion, did everyone forget when creepyyeha thigh high holders were a whole ass thing? This motif has been used by a bunch of punk brands in japan before, it's not even original.

"the rabbit has tits" who cares

>>10582108
I agree with this to an extent, but it's not something that usually is included in lolita fashion. I think when lolita bounds too far outside of boundaries, it's just a whole different fashion genre.

Sure, we can have punk and other jfashion genres with bondagey themes that might have lolita brand pieces but the likelihood it's going to fall into the lolita umbrella afterwards is pretty low. I think that's where people are getting particular and there's a lot of rules that already get ignored on the daily within CoF.

>>10582108
same it makes me cringe so bad like what are you doing in an alternative fashion if you draw the line at cute teddy bears in cartoon bondage

>>10582108
Once again I am reminded that people are A-OK with nef the literal nazi posting to COF, but titty bunnies are far too offensive

>>10582111
ngl you cringe far too easily for a fashion full of socially awkward girls lmfao

>>10582025
Oh the heart attacks you must get from Miho Matsuda's La Nursery Noire print (pic related), if you think this is already too literal kink. Prints like this have been in lolita for about as long as prints exits. Not that often/popular but it's nothing new. It's just the one of the few times it's blown out of proportion by snowflakes.

>literal kink and not aesthetic
Stained glass Maria prints en such is also literal Christianity. But it's not meant as a Christianity dress. It's just used it for aesthetic reasons. Because the Japanese think it looks cool. This kind of dresses are similarly just an aesthetic thing. They aren't meant as kink dresses in any way. The designers just figured it looks cool. "It looks cool" is quite literally the end of the dept of these prints, so yes it's an aesthetic thing and nothing more. Don't be a snowflake and act like it's deeper than that.

>unlike bondage harnesses
The print is literally just stuffed animals wearing those, but I guess it's only ok if humans wear them kek.
>stuff for children
So considering the only "children" stuff here is the stuffed animals, you're saying every adult with stuffed animals, which includes many lolitas but also enough normies (especially in East-Asia but also in the west) who have some because it looks cute are just playing with children stuff. Good way to insult many lolitas at once, and to look like a larper on a fucking jfash related board.

>>10582112
American culture

>>10582147
fuck trevor brown, it's literally kink. have you seen his art? his interviews where he says he likes 18 year old girls who look 13 and that 17 a girl is mature enough to be plowed?

>>10582111
>>10582112
It makes me so happy Japanese designers don't give much fucks about the western community. If they would alter everything for out needs, soon half the prints are getting banned because someone is offended somewhere. Not to forget they likely would get sweet banned because of the few retards that keep saying it's just children's shit...

>>10582112
Yooooo can you share how we know that person is a nazi? I like their coords and that bums me out.

>>10582060
Is that a pattern on them? I’m confused

>>10582150
You're missing the point. Point is people are over reacting on that ugly Diamond Honey dress, Japanese designers just like aesthetics and don't think about it too deep unlike the western/American lolitas who go crazy over stuff that's not meant much, and kink related prints aren't some new invention by Diamond Honey.

This dress was way worse than that ugly Diamond Honey thing, but it's still lolita and somehow didn't derail an entire ita tread because people are so sensitive because muh the stuffed animals have harnesses. Point is it's nothing new (unlike some have claimed) nor is it the worst, so why sperch over this ugly thing. All they do is stop it from fading away like the other dresses with such themes, and instead keep it in the spotlight so that all the edgy itas know what to buy next.

Even if Trevor Brown sucks, I doubt Miho Matsuda went checking too deep into him. They likely just saw the art, thought it looked cool, and did a collab. Japanese designers often enough don't notice/care for much deeper than the surface. Look at how much brands worked together with the Leighs. Acting like this is some deep kinky dress when it's literally just typical "Jfash looks cool" stuff is dumb. It's not that deep.

>>10582154
There is one person continuously screaming this, but never has any screenshot or anything. They claim nef said she's alt right and claims her boyfriend is a neo-nazi, but no one remembers and surprisingly, no proof anywhere. More likely just a vendetta based on the fact she had Die Walkure. Even since she posted that dress someone has been saying such stuff but never has proof, being very determined to try to get her banned. Yet not determined enough to screenshot a thing or come with actual proof.

>>10582160
>More likely just a vendetta based on the fact she had Die Walkure
I don’t understand why people keep making this accusation over this piece in particular. If it’s nazish to own a nazi-themed thing, shouldn’t it also be nazish to give any money to the company that profited off it, i.e. to ever buy anything from Meta?

>>10581562
she looks like fancy toilet paper

>>10582163
this board only hold whites accountable just like the rest of the DW spergs

>>10582163
I agree. I mean, what's next? Are we also gonna boycot every person who wear Hugo Boss? They made actual nazi uniforms, and that's not even really a secret. But I guess that's ok, as long as their current clothes look different from those uniforms they made back then. Oh, and let's not forget Walt Disney. They made Nazi propaganda too. So let's Boycot all collaps and Disney related themes.

Really, being inspired by the aesthetic of an outfit isn't the most problematic thing around. Honestly, I also feel like if Japan would have been on the other side of the war, people would be much more open to the fact they likely just liked the look. Just like, you know, the enormous amount of normie fashion based on military clothes.

>>10582168
>being inspired by the aesthetic of an outfit isn't the most problematic thing around.
Sometimes evil people just look fucking fashionable.

>>10582170
This. And in the case of Nazis it was intentional. Not to mention queer coding of villains in Western media making villains look even more fabulous.

>>10581941
That RC thread is the funniest in a while. The amount of people flat out attacking each other, bringing up past trangressions, talking about how they're using the thread to ban people in their own groups, all over this cringey taobao dress ... hilarious. The lolita community is fucking hopeless.

>>10582154
>>10582160
the last time I posted proof I got banned so you're out of luck

I know this was from BSOLF but it's hopeless imo. This is supposedly old school lolita, because she had "high quality solid fabric" and apperantly solid fabric equals old-school lolita. As well as Snow White cosplay equaling oldschool (and don't start with Claudia the fairytale princess OP from Baby or that Infanta Snow White dress because both looked thousand times less costumey and overall beter, now where they oldschool). The dress doesn't even have shape without a random red scarf (which is not in later pics so guess not really part of the dress). She's also wearing those plastic swimming shoes that should have stayed at her swimming classes when she was a toddler.

The close-up the bodies has random loose treads, but I'm willing to let that pass as maybe it's a quick shot taken while sewing. I'm also not going to complain about the petticoat showing as she acknowledged and addressed that as part of the WIP already, so I'll let that one pass in hope she indeed still has to alter that to for the better. Other issues whereby addressed tho.

In b4:
>Go give her help on the group then.
Sorry but I don't know how to put it nicely that she's completely missing the mark and looks like a bad, cheap Snow White wannabe cosplayer. I mean, I can say it nicer than that obviously, but there is no way I can make it nor an overal negative message. And if you can't say something nice or at least constructive you shouldn't talk. Feel free to do it yourself if you know a way to put it nicely.

>>10581955
Was is this obsession with calling people who don’t like seeing disgusting kink shit out in the open “virginal”? If you like it fine but parading it around is gross lmao

>>10582194
Be as nice as you possibly can, even if it’s negative overall, then submit to BtB: a lot more of the Facebook types have been checking that recently, I think since the GASB dramu

>>10582193
>No one ever saw proof.
>Only on anonymous places like cgl and btb some anon seems obsessed over this rumor no one ever saw proof from.
>"I got banned for proving".
>So I just keep obsessively screeching accusations on a rando I don't know without proof.
>Because it's so important to me people to know it that I keep saying it for months if not years now
>But not important enough to try posting proof on any of the many places ever again.
>Despite that being the one and only thing that could make people believe me and settle this once and for all.
Just stop obsessing over this person or proof it. No one will believes you after all this time, and no one will without proof. It's getting real old. We all know you're just having a vendetta. Wonder if you're an extremist that condemns everybody who does something you don't like a Nazi or if you're actually just jealous on her owning Die Walkure and actually daring to post it.

>>10582194
>tfw this was also posted to the subreddit and got 350+ upvotes
>the single most critical comment just called it "a little costumey" and fluffed it up with a bunch of a compliments
I know the standards for that sub are on the fucking ground but jfc

>>10582193
>>10582202
Also if you really worry about getting banned. Post the proof on the farm in the lolita general thread. It's time for a new one due to the amount of replies anyways, so great way for you to make sure it's as visible as possible for a long time, while staying anonymous and being on a place where you're not only allowed to drag others, but encouraged as long as there is milk. So unless it's a blabant lie, completely taken out of context, or something else that shows its just your vendetta instead of her being a nazi you've got nothing to fear. Pretty sure "popular lolita who had rumour for long is officially proven to be a nazi" will be milky enough, since everyone keeps asking for proof whenever you start about it again...

>>10581996
No it doesn't have tits. If you zoom in, it's just a chain. Looks unfortunate from far away though lol.

>>10582196
1000€ on the fact that this anon is from burgerland — anyone game? The puritanical yanks strike again and enforce their norms on all of us!!

>>10582202
“Some anon” .... it’s definitely more than one person. Cope harder nef, it’s your own fault for being a fucking /pol/tard

>>10582154
>>10582163
>>10582176
Ya'll need to start spouting this shit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

Seriously. I'm tired of this generation comparing everything to nazi germany. I've heard some fucktards claim "nazi" shit towards my German friends for just being German or the ones that live in Germany. It's HIGHLY offensive to begin with to German people and everyone in the US is so fucking insensitive to anything else but their own small little race bubble.

Comparing things to Nazi germany is literal absurdity and makes me realize the majority of humans that live now have it 'way too good' to keep comparing things to something that was literal evil. The only Nazi shit going on right now is the racism on 'white people' in the US.

>>10582210
I mean if someone believes in the white master race then yeah that’s pretty nazi of them

>>10582163
What do you have against Japan? Who do you think they were, anti-Fascist?

>>10582210
As an ACTUAL German, fuck you, racist LARPer

>>10582194
I've seen this picture posted in 5 groups already. She's really here for the asspats

>>10582210
Idk what my post agreeing that the bad guys are sometimes just really fashionable have to do with people accusing Nef of being a Nazi.

>>10582214
OK American mutt. I'm talking about people who are from actual Germany comparing shit to nazi crap in the US.

>>10582214
my heritaguuu uwuuuu

>>10582208
Well if saying something about it triggers you this much I suppose I’ll keep doing it <3

you aren't fucking japanese you nigger

>>10582223
The coord is cute take that to btb this doesn't belong here

>>10582223
They really need to stop having kids

>>10582223
this coord is really cute, take your racism to /pol/

>>10582223
This is cute. Sorry you are racist.

>>10582223
that's chinese, fag.

>>10582223
jealous fatty detected

>>10582208
God you are such a fucking tranny

>>10582160
>Even if Trevor Brown sucks, I doubt Miho Matsuda went checking too deep into him. They likely just saw the art, thought it looked cool, and did a collab.

Anon, I agree with your other points, but 9 times out of 10 he literally makes pedo art. They wouldn't have needed to do a background check on him because it's all on the surface.

>>10582342
ouji itas are the worst.

>>10582352
What in the swedish flag/ ikea eyesore color palette is this nonsense

>>10582147
Referencing art by an actual pedo doesn't help your case anon

>>10582194
this is the same girl that did that DnD/Guy Fieri coordinate, isn't it

>>10582164
fucking underrated comment
yes anon ty for the luls

>>10582225
oh no....

>>10582150
17 is above the age of consent in most countries of the world so don't care about that. do you have a reference for the other thing?

>>10582164
Thanks for reminding me these exist. There's cake versions too.

>>10582379
https://japantoday.com/category/features/is-there-more-to-controversial-art-of-trevor-brown-than-meets-the-eye

>"I’m not even particularly sexually attracted to children at all. Well, physically, not until around the age of 14..."
>"I love 18-year-olds who look 12!"

>>10582069
Okay, groomer

>>10582147
>>10582067
>>10582069
Imagine literally forcing your fetish on other unconsenting people and exposing minors to graphic depictions of your fetish and screeching that you're special for being subversive.

Imagine entering a safe fashion for underage girls to feel pretty in, and making everyone around you look at and tolerate your sexually exhibitory behavior.

>>10581748
Tattoos, piercings, and dyed hair have no place in lolita.

>>10582417
But unnaturally colored wigs are ok?

>>10582418
>>10582417
*and ear lobe piercings?

>>10582415
Huh??
This fashion isn't for children it's for women and it's obviously not an 18+ but it's not for
>Underage girls
Lots of brands come out with fetish inspired clothing
Vw popularized fetish gear and it's inspired alot of fashions connected to lolita
Bondage pants are popular amongst teenagers are they all kinky fetishest for wearing them too

>>10582415
What if it’s not my fetish? What if I’m just in atl-fashion because I like being edgy? Lol there’s nothing “exhibiting my kinks” about this. My kink is not tying up fluffy rabbits, it’s just an ugly dress, chill the fuck out

>>10582417
Ok boomer

>>10582424
anon, how do you get that is not the same? wearing stuff maybe meant for bandage in an obviously not sexual situation isn't anything like depicting literal bondage. especially this kind of ageplay/furry adjacent shit.

>>10582417
>and dyed hair
Mana confirmed to be poser

>>10581658
did she write a review in order to ask about the fit?

>>10582216
I guess because they decided nef must be nazi over an outfit that's inspired by fashionable evil people? Because until someone posts proof that stays the only thing she ever provenly did and that conversation led to the post you reacted to. Bit of a reach tho, but so is calling people nazis because you dislike something they did.

>>10582210
I wanted to agree until the last bit. It's true that it's a very sensitive subject in Germany, and that Americans seem to be very good in only recognising their own sensitive topic but being harsh to those of other countries. But then you had to trow in racist nazi calling bullshit at the end and you ruined it. Fuck you anon.

>>10582210
this reminds me of white people going like "wow sorry for being white!! its not my fault that my ancestors were racist slave owners!! you know it's really hard being white too because we get called colonizers and crackers all the time"

>>10582415
>Imagine entering a safe fashion for underage girls
Then you didn't enter lolita fashion. It's not made for underage girls and it has done this kind of stuff since forever. So if you're too sensitive to be in an alt fashion having sometimes inspiration from and themes like this, lolita, and likely any alt fashion ever, isn't for you.

There is a huge difference in edgy theming, and sissies and kinksters using the fashion to get off. The first is fine and been there since forever, the later needs to fuck off. How is that so hard to understand.

>>10582424
Oh you just reminded me again of that H.Naoto chastity dress thing. Anyone remember the actual name of it? It was on the wtf burando on LJ I think.

>>10582472
Yes. Also not really fit, but magic poof. Because 2010 weebs didn't understand petticoats existed and thought dresses magically are poofy by cut, causing them to become super disappointed when it arrived kek.

Classic brand ita. Nothing matches

>>10582486
Vendeta
This is fine

>>10582486
The white is out of place but everything else matches OK.
I will always remember her as the hair girl though. You still have a vendetta after that long?

>>10582499
The hair girl?

>>10582486
I’d call this a nitpick - change out the tights and it’s nice

>>10581018
https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1616517933027.webm

>>10582501
During one of the Moitie tea parties she absolutely wouldn't shut up about her hair and ended up dominating the conversations to make it about her.

Please shut the fuck up about the DH OP it’s hideous and cheap looking. Stop derailing post itas

>>10582529

>>10582529
Wasn’t this one posted already? Also the jelly shoes bring back memories.

>>10582532
This is good, but not technically lolita. Sweet ouji? I’m not really sure

>>10582535
>this is good
anon...

>>10582532
vendetta

>>10582532
This is fine.

>>10582504
her hair looks like shit too.

>>10582551
At least it’s clean looking. Half these people don’t even wash their hair, or clothes for that matter.

>>10582164
sounds like an AP print

>>10582702
looks fine

>>10582702
If this is all we’ve got in the ita thread, why even bother having an ita thread? I wouldn’t even call it a nitpick, it’s literally fine - I guess OP doesn’t like it because she doesn’t have bangs?

>>10582486

This person has really polished coords and her style of often experimental. 100% doesn't belong here. Honestly she's goals.

>>10582725
your coord sucks

>>10582725
If you try anything experimental you get posted here. Lame. I like seeing people try different creative coords.

>>10582730
>>10582725
samefag

>>10582730
I mean, the tights don’t match, so I wouldn’t say it’s goals. But overall its not ita no, I’d call it a nitpick

>>10582417
bait or extremely bad take, i'm thinking the former.

>>10582688
~Fancy Papier Toilette~

>>10582037
Don't ever insult MAM like this ever again

>>10582715
>>10582723
Wtf raise your standards? She literally just put on a dress it’s not even a coord. I don’t even want to talk about the hair but the bow? It’s sad. No matching jewelry? The shoes don’t match and legwear is fugly.

>>10582741
nitpick at best. her hair is ugly but the rest seems like ott sweetfag nitpicks

>>10582486
This was a triplet with Josine and Vudu Juju. If you're gonna put this in the ita thread, better put them all here

>>10582417
>and dyed hair

>>10582827
Even Misako dyes her hair

>>10582827
>>10582829

Must both be ita then by anons standards. Would love to see what anon looks like!

>>10582829
>Even Misako dyes her hair
OH NOU! DAT IZ AGANYZD LULIDA FASHOON RULEZ!!!111 Aaaaaaarghhhhhhhh!!!11111111oneoneeleven

>>10582832
Rinrin does too as well, and uses streaks of unnatural colors. Crazy that people think an alt fashion in which brand models have dyed hair regularly is incongruent with dyed hair.

Gooyz! Have yoo seen duz clofn meygoob? Klown meykap dozynd beloong too loolida!

>>10581754
the left is cute AF, looks like a coord you'd see in an old street snap. not ita.

>>10582529
This looks like an Ariel Disneybounding outfit. Not so bad for what it is.

>>10582532
Looks like sissy ouji
Who the fuck is defending this they look like an adult baby

>>10582532
why is everyone saying this is fine? looks like shit

>>10582702
Is that a dead rat on her head?

>>10582702
I hate this haircut

>>10582929
>why is everyone saying this is fine?
Because it is fine.

>>10582936
it's not.

>>10582938
prove it

>>10582943
i can see it. next.

>>10582949
>next
pill?

>>10582961
i need some caffeine pills because you are boring me to death with your bad takes.

>>10583034
try cocaine its more effective

>>10583039
If you have this serve problems with concentration for longer than 5 seconds, try picrel

the conversation is more cringe than the photos

>>10582702
This is cute and simple. Not ita.

>>10583075
I think that one anon who has problem with it mainly has a problem with the punk hairstyle.

>>10583044
Then this anon comes around with an actual health advice lmao

>>10582702
If she gets a different haircut or wears a wig it'll be fine. Until then that hair ruins it tho.

>>10582786
It was posted alone in CoF, sorry got better things to do than searching further for itas than comes up on my FB feed. But if they have random white printed tights on an otherwise unthemed solid coord with red and black, sure they'll belong here too.

>>10582833
>>10582843
you must be 18+ to post here

>>10582486
Not sure why anons are wking this person, but the coord genuinely looks like shit.

>>10583124
then what are you doing here?

>>10583134

Because her comm lurks here and will wk their own to the point of shitting up threads.

Not saying this is it's but lmao this is definitely just mediocre and it's definitely not experimental.

>>10583368
What the fuck is this

>>10583374
which comm? she’s british, right?

>>10583332
This is cute c

>>10583368
It's a bit sad that western brand dresses always look a bit "off" when compared to Japanese brands.

>>10583386
A bit off? This looks like someone’s dad in a Halloween costume

>>10582112
stop, you're embarassing yourself with your vendetta do you have a crush on her that you bring her up every single time?

>>10582112
lmao you are a meme at this point

>>10583386
it's because they have no details. it's just a tube bodice and a rectangle skirt.

>>10583398
>>10583395
sameag, go away nazi-chan

>>10583383
This just looks like babys first

>>10582504
lmao that was her? I always got unpleasant vibes from her, glad to know my hunch was right

this is the worst ita thread i've ever seen

>>10583387
I'm well aware the George Clooney looking guy wearing a lolita dress is more than "off". But the Fluffy Tori dress made think it was a shame that alot of western brands put so much effort and time into making dresses yet almost all of them look offputting.

>>10583381
>>What the fuck is this

I am also in awe with this anon. What the fuck is this.....

>>10583332
Definitely needs a bit of help, but not ita. The shoes are definitely out of place, though..

>>10583368
Is this the same guy who was in the pic with 3 other lolitas? Otherwise there's 2 guys in beret's running around unapologetically looking like dads in frilly dresses which I'm not sure how to feel about...

>>10583395
Literally why would anyone like that she reeks of straight

>>10583332
Sauce on the shoes? They might not fit the aesthetic but they are cute.

>>10583546
Dolls kill / sugar thrillz aka normie e girl shoes

Post itas.

>>10583546
>Sauce on the shoes? They might not fit the aesthetic but they are cute.

Why not fit? Are platform shoes reserved for Mana only?

>>10583368
honestly kind of based, his lack of fucks to give is inspiring

>>10583566
This design could pass in gothic, but the it's just not sweet enough enough for... sweet. Too kink and industrial inspired. A nice pair of sweet appropriate platforms would have thinner straps and bows, like tea parties.

>>10583381
>What the fuck is this
A guy, probably in his late 50's/early 60's wearing a lolita coord.

------------------------------------------------------------
Pleas upvote if you find this post helpful

>>10583571
ok, was it tagged as sweet?

>>10583567
This

>>10583505
Heterophobia so rori

>>10582209
Nayrt, so multiple people know but there's no proof? That's really suspicious. Idk who she is but milk is milk, if that proof was real it would have been posted by now. Instead there's an anon claiming to be butthurt and that's why "there's no proof"

>>10583694
The proof's been posted multiple times, on cgl and lolcow (about 3-4 threads ago). When she was posting all her stupid alt-right girlfriend shit, she made references to her real name, some of her comm members said she was a bit "politically questionable", and, if I remember, even provided a picture of herself holding a time-stamped sign. She's been keeping a much lower profile since the series nazi-chan blow-ups on the board and she stopped posting coords altogether for awhile. She's on this board and reports posts about her very quickly, so asking for the pictures to get reposted is just asking for threads to get blown-up. Just search the archive. Constantly retreading her drama always brings out WKs screeching about the proof not existing, but it does, it just takes a little searching to bring it up (kinda like the full WF drama).

>>10583719
Thanks for taking the time to explain all the context anon, I'll have some deep diving to do over the weekend! If that's the case where there's tons of proof floating around, then that's not a good look for anyone saying there's "none" lmao

>>10582741
its not great but definitely not ita lurk moar

>>10583728
Yeah Nef has been proven multiple times to be active on here so it’s not really shocking that every time someone mentions she’s iffy, someone MIRACULOUSLY comes and jumps to her defense within instants... either it’s her or there are more lolitas willing to accept a *probable* nazi because uwu not enough evidence

>>10583719
It would be really helpful if someone were to post it to BtB, now that it’s active again, wouldn’t it...

>>10583332

The reason this doesn't look bad is because of the heavy-handed colour filtering. The middle of both photos are so blown out the print is oblivion and roses in the middle are completely white rather than pink.

I'd guess it doesn't look as good without the shoop, or at least, everything below her skirt looks pretty bad to me. But hey good lesson that you should overshop your photos to disguise the ita.

>>10583739
Do it yourself

>>10583691
Sorry you’re ugly and straight

>>10583738
>willing to accept a *probable* nazi
>probable
So we're witch hunting now?

>>10583794
sorry you're fat and use gayness as an excuse for why no one wants to fuck you

>>10583807
Nayrt but this is the most pickme shit I've ever heard

>>10583813
Straight women are like that

>>10583801
You know how it is, guilty until proven innocent

>>10583826
Seriously SJWs are literally foaming at the mouth waiting to cancel somebody

>>10583381
It's Sergeant Kawaii

>>10581827

have you seriously never been to a university before?

Almost everyone has them, especially first year housing dorms.

>>10583836
Wish we could cancel all SJWs for this behavior. Shit's inexcusable imo.

>>10583801
SJWs are always witch hunting. They don't know how to actually be decent people, so they need to point out someone's supposed bad behavior so they can 'look' like a good person by comparison. But without actually having to do anything. They are fucking useless.

>>10584065
My fav is all the weird virtue signaling on social media. And the “If you don’t share/repost x y z you are racist!!!!1”

>>10583403
nayrt but it’s not. She posts almost daily.

>>10584065
I like to call them vultures.

Best defense is to never back pedal. Most of the SJWs online are socially awkward and pick on people who can't/won't fight back. Fighting back is literally the one thing they don't expect, nowadays.

Nothing says lolita like some chest hair.

>>10583381
Just someone grandpapa living his best life

>>10584155
is that reithejelly

>Disney princess
>inspiration
Lolita fashion is not a costume.
Lolita fashion is not a costume.
Lolita fashion is NOT a COSTUME.

>>10582843
sounds like you're going to the anime midwest juggalo party

>>10583839
KEK

honestly if all his photos are gonna be as bizarre as this one, i hope to see more

>>10584155
Ugh the individual pieces aren't/that/ terrible how did she manage to fuck it up

>>10584263
Each of these individuals pieces are just as awful as them all together

>>10581679
Barf, disgusting. Make a trannylita thread or some shit.

>>10582147
nobody wants to see your fetish crap regardless of who made it or how accepted you think it is

>>10582342
ou, gee...

>>10582486
that's a bunch of money spent on a completely unmatching outfit

>>10582532
the only people who would approve of this also have an account on fur affinity-tier websites

>>10582702
what the fuck did she do to her head?

>>10583368
he looks like he lost a bet from his fat girlfriend

>>10581679
Really like this coord but holy fuck do I feel threatened.

>>10582067
May God have mercy on your soul.

>>10582194
Kek. Was waiting for someone to post this. Leave your disney princess larping out of lolita.

>>10582307
>Random pink fuzzy earmuffs
>Literal morning star???
>Confused cross eyed expression

I have SO many questions

>>10583801
the idea is to call attention to something, with any individual making the choice of whether or not to keep supporting or engaging with that person. But the internet is a trashfire so we don't get to have nice things, abusive drama fucks like WF come out and make it a witch hunt and all calm criticism and conversations to be had goes up in flames

>>10583383
posting this girl is rude, her coords are simple because she's a beginner.

>>10584296
there have been so many people that didn't belong in this thread, i agree strongly with you on that one

>>10584254
Oof

>>10584295
But there's nothing to call attention to? It's just accusations

>>10584254

....It's probably just a young un who hasn't figured out how to properly sew....I think?

I feel like their decision to choose the uglier Disney dress (even before being ripped I think the dress was made ugly on purpose, as it was put together from thrown-out old scraps of clothing) says that they subconsciously know this isn't going to be the "good" dress.

>>10584153
Imagine him trying to move in that dress he’s squeezed into only to push him down a flight of stairs and hear him squeal like a gross pig

>>10583719
I've been active for years but I kinda come and go. I've often seen it said without proof (and flat-out refusal to post it) so it really felt like a vendetta. Made me doubt the legiticy a lot. But I guess if this is true I could have missed the proof due to the deletion as I'm not active all the time. I'll go check it out. Thanks for actually explaining the full thing. This is undoubtly the most useful post I've seen from an anon who's on the "she's a nazi" side.

>>10583719
>>10584328
I went to the farm but so far I only found the following statements in Lolita lolcow - Part 3:
>nef wearing Die Walkure with a horrible cosplay wig (picture)
>nef being an edgelord
>nef being cringey claiming to be the anti-SJW military (as in substyle) loli gf
>nef wearing Die Walkure to university just to trigger SJW classmates
>nef being bad at covering her tracks on 4chan
>4chan doesn't know the difference between being edgy and alt-right
So aside of being a cringey edgelord with annoying personality and owning Die Walkure, what else have we got? Did I miss something? because this still isn't really nazi proof... If there is more I'm seriously curious, because if she's really proven to be a nazi that's some serious milk against her and I'd be leaving the vendetta side right away. But I just don't see that much actual proof, just maybe so maybe not?

>>10584254
She decided to pair this monstrosity with those ugly plastic swimming shoes. Guess her coording skills are about as good as her sewing skills. Kinda can't wait till she post the worn outfit, it's promising kek.

What's with itas wearing those fugly shoes anyways? They don't belong anywhere near lolita and never did.

>>10584349
>You can act like as much of a dipshit as you want as long as you say you're just being edgy

>>10584560
No one said that. She seems proven to be a shitty edgelord and annoying dipshit, which is bad. But that doesn't equal being an actual nazi. There is still a huge gap between dipshit and nazi you know...

So far she just seems an average degenerate. Hate worthy, but not years of claiming she's a proven nazi whenever anons can worthy. I would love to believe she is a nazi, even if just for the sake of enjoying some milk, but I simply couldn't find more than this bit. Hence I said if I missed something let me know. But this is so little that the subject died in 5 posts on lolcow due to lack of milk...

I don’t even think she attempted to make this a real coord in any way how does this even have any likes

>>10584597
>harness
What in the bestiality?

>>10581679
https://youtu.be/G5ykpBEy95I

>>10584796
Lol whyyyy hahaha

>>10584783
Looks like she's taking me on a train to the Hunger Games

>>10584783
>kink collar with Marie charm

why must we sexualize disney cats

>>10584597
She kinda looks like she was wearing some sort of local tradition clothes, then randomly put a cheap harness over it. Which just looks super weirdly out of place.

Not just about this specific one, but also about it. I'm always feeling a bit bothered how the pleather used on such harness is always so cheap it just looks plastic, not even close to leather. Has there actually ever been an alt fash brand that used leather looking pleather?

>>10584831
I think it's just a cat collar kinda design. You know, because Marie is a cat. So it goes with the theme. It's often not that deep. Not everything is about sex you know, and not each (fake) leather choker is a "kink collar". Sounds like you might need to think about sex a little less. Necklace is still tacky tho.

>>10584796
Has been posted before, might be previous tread. Give us new itas.

>>10584849
Why you defending dee dee doo doo

>>10584845
Moitie and VW have done decent pleather. Meta has done a few pleather pieces which are hit or miss, depending.
>>10584849
nayrt but I immediately saw this as a kink collar too. They’re really popular with the ddlg crowd. Pls lurk more.

This... monstrosity is being sold for nearly $300 as "the ultimate gothic lolita dress"

>>10584849
Marie literally never wears a collar though she always wears a pink ribbon. in no world does it make sense

>>10584958
I meant for this kind of harnesses specifically. I don't recall Moitie, VW nor Meta making harnesses?

>>10584783
Anybody else wore this it wouldn't be in this thread. Get off your vandetta hard on.

>>10584796
this bitch is taking this joke way too far. Totally creepy

>>10584966
if I ever feel sad I just go to depop to laugh at shit like this

>>10585686

>>10584796
I want to see this bunny all dressed up and propped up at a public place.