/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>10698439
>>10698633
If it's being shipped overseas it's not that uncommon. Calm down.

Hello、

>>10698736
hey pedo tranny groomer, what’s up

>>10698738
not cool lauren

>>10698673
No one is upset and yeah it is uncommon for something your ordered in the spring to arrive in November unless you're a time traveler from 1921.

>>10698747
>has never heard of seamail

>>10698747
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read.

>>10698747
No it isn't lmao it took a dress eight months to arrive from Japan because the only option available was the slowest one.

Wunderwelt hasn't updated it like 4 days?? I'm kinda sad about it and it's really weird.

>>10698916
They're having technical issues. See this tweet:
https://twitter.com/wunderwelt2014/status/1460466748939853830
and just follow the link from there. They mentioned that all the new stuff from 11/13-11/16 is from page 10 onwards lol

are secondhand sales dead rn? feels like even cute things don’t sell out immediately, more like a few hours to a day

>>10698921
Great new website, Wunderwelt. Very cool!

Wish Wunderwelt would update their very cool shipping policy and ship my package which has been in storage for months. Closet child can ship here, but they can't? I'll pay for dhl and their ridiculous "import fees", I dont care at this point.
t. leaf

>>10698949
it seems like it, seen a lot of cute brand items at reasonable/cheap prices not selling which is surprising

>>10698916
Wunderwelt has been so bad recently. It's probably because people are selling on Mercari/Fril more now as their items are worth more than what they pay

>buyer messages me asking me to hold an op for them
>doesn't specify which op
>i say yes, can you let me know which op you are talking about as i have several for sale
>2 days not opened my message
>i still don't know which op they were talking about

lol

>>10698673
I’m op of >>10698439 , my package is coming from the country I live in… Which is the US sadly enough.

My problem was not the slow shipping, my big problem was that she just never sent out my piece. It felt a little careless, but she’s been a good seller before.

>>10698916
Just came here to ask, has anyone else tried to log in to WW today and gotten this message?

And then they emailed me a password reset... I haven't changed my password since the site renewal so wtf happened all of a sudden for them to issue this, did they get hacked?

What is going on with them, they should have just left the old site as-is. It was better than this mess.

>>10699390
Yes, several websites not just wunderwelt or lolita related have asked to change passwords for security reasons, i suspect it’s whatever app they use to handle login doing it. I dont think anyone got hacked they just want to prevent hacking.
Also yeah new wunderwelt sucks ass

>>10685673
People that arrange sales outside of auction don't always post up with the same price that is actually being paid.

>>10686116
Dispute it retard.

>>10686630
Just like with lolibrary you have to be in the inner circle.

>>10699394
From infosec perspective, you don't typically force users to reset passwords unless there's been a breach.
Why damage user confidence unless there is a legitimate reason?

>>10699400
Because even my internal company website that you can only access within the locked building asked us to do it. so unless there was a huge worldwide breach i think it’s fine. I don’t see it as damaging user confidence in fact we should be changing pw often. I’m in IT and i haven’t heard anything about a breach but i guess its still possible. I know what breach protocol looks like having been through it before and it wasn’t this

>>10699400
This is not true across the board. Many companies are preemptive with security measures and force you to change your password regularly just to be safe or if they have recently changed the rules for what characters, length, or other elements your password needs to meet their security threshold, among other things.

>>10699402
>internal company website
Yeah, not the same thing.
>>10699405
>preemptive security!!!
Two things; one, there is no precedent for WW championing preemptive security. Two, forcing users to regularly change passwords is sec theater and actually does more harm than good becuase typically if you let a user set a password once, they will use the longest and most complicated one they're comfortable with, regular changes means you pick a simpler password that is most likely sequential, entirely eliminating the point.

Did they change hosting site or something? It might have been a req of their new service provider.

>>10699409
Yeah...i used the internal company site as an example. Google also asked me the same thing. Unless suddenly a bunch of websites all got hacked in the past day then nothing happened.

>regular changes means you pick a simpler password that is most likely sequential

No...unless it's a shitty website, they're not going to let you use anything sequential or related to your old password. It blocks you.

Please I would advise you to read up about tech security before spouting this nonsense.

>>10699434
Your suggestion that only 'shitty websites' would let you do a sequential change is fucking moronic.
If you change your shit pw from 'Cat123!' to 'Cat123@' the script that checks for same pw is going to accept it, becuase it's a different pw.
But let's say your reality is the only one that exists, having to widely change a pw so no parts of the previous one is in the new one will frustrate and severely limit users to the point they will revolt and your IT dept will be dismantled to the last stone. Also everyone's pws will be extremely easy to guess becuase who can fucking remember all those different passwords?

If you work in IT you must be a sw engineer or in marketing or something bdecause dear god are you fucking clueless.

>>10699439
Ahaha you’re really funny i haven’t heard anything this stupid in ages. Did you take like 1 cybersecurity class haha.
You simply can’t use ‘cat123’ again at all even if you added @ or random characters to the end. as the system checks for sequential characters. You could use ‘cat1@2@3’ however.
Our clients and employees deal with it because they know they need to. No one revolts. If you’re not retarded you can remember new passwords or develop a system.

>dismantling IT to the last stone
Hahaha please nonny give me more gems like this

>>10699443
Oh I get it you work for a shitty bay area tech startup and you think their assbackwards standards are common practice. No honey, your boss is just psychotic.

>>10699447
Did i hit a nerve there nonny? Sorry you had a bad experience with the bay area. Nope i work in the midwest for a 50+ year old company. I guess that sounds like ‘bay area startup’ if you’re retarded though

>>10699448
It's not asshole inspection day my dude you don't need to embarrass yourself like this. Also, flyover state.

>>10699443
Uh, my company requires regular password changes and they don't pull this shit because it's endlessly frustrating to have to come up with a new password every other month and not ever reuse sequences.

>>10699453
sorry you're retarded about tech stuff nonny it's ok.yes it's a great flyover state, less dumb tourists

>>10699447
>>10699448
Nta for either but damn dudes. Wunderwelt is a shit website, no need to go on an IT-epeen measuring contest over it.

I work for a fortune 500 in IT >>10699439 has some bearing just because unless you're in big tech or a tech company then yes, sometimes the nontech savvy people get more of a say in dumb shit that they shouldn't.

However, info sec rules literally every piece of my company -- so you literally lose your privileges over anything and everything if you don't adhere. I think the level of security is more dependent on the size of the company and data that needs to be secure.

>>10699457
but i need to feel angry today tho and let out my stress
jk i'm good now. i never worked in a smaller company or a company that had to worry a lot about protecting data. so it's possible they do pretty weird shit when it comes to reusing pw.
they do lock you out of your account at my company too if you don't adhere to changing pw kek. i fucked around and found out the hard way

>>10699457
Fortune 5 here. Infosec is only as good as your lowest common denominator.

>>10699462
Correct. Being in Fortune 500, we have a shit ton of data. Shit infosec (although they are anally reaming you for power) and >>10699439
applies.

>>10699464
What gets me though is nonny anon's projecting, as if the specific policies of their co is somehow the bog standard of the internet.
We're talking about WW's site, not for internal networks for aerospace development or something.
Weird hill to get chafed about regardless.

On that note though pretty sure it's just a switch in hosting or to comply with new security standards, rise of scam industry has seen a dramatic increase in botnets. I'd imagine even niche markets and businesses are getting hit hard.

>>10699400
>>10699400
>>10699402
>>10699405
>>10699409
>>10699434
>>10699439
>>10699443
>>10699447
>>10699448
>>10699454
>>10699456
Shut the fuck up and take your IT sperging to a board that actually cares

>>10699484
It was hours ago dude calm down, not like this thread is going to morn the loss of this handful of post count anyway.

>>10699495
Nta but considering the last replies were only 20 minutes ahead of that anons post it really wasn't hours ago
This board is slow with responses in general anyway though
In any case it's annoying as hell that every thread tends to get derailed here by pointless arguments

>>10699500
Lol it's an old joke, just basically saying that the argument had already run it's course. Going on a brief tangent is hardly a derail anyway.
>>10699057
I guess they changed their mind, fukkin time wasters.

Finally got a crappy buyer after all these years. Filed a PayPal claim on me. What are the odds they’ll end up with a free dress and me out of money?

>>10684026
Is LM being slow as fuck today or is it just me? Some listings are not loading and there's been about two or three new listings after 16 hours

>>10701119
Basically 100% unless you’ve got a signature tracking that says delivered even then they might file a chargeback

>>10701251
Well I’ll be damned. That’s not fair at all, does it help they admitted they got the item?

>>10701228
I noticed that too; seems to be back to normal for me now tho!

>>10701350
if she ghosts you can just tell paypal she didnt send it back and you will probably win. had this happent to me before

if she says it’s in bad condition you’re fucked unless you refund or accept a return, even if she destroyed the dress

ITT: "maybe if i say poorfag and newfag enough my LARPing will look more legit"