[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

Search:


View post   

>> No.10668600 [View]
File: 41 KB, 728x653, 2312bb30f583b7e278e8ac66f3f6601c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10668600

>>10668520
>I reject the notion that sexual harassment is defined by how the victim feels. It's defined by actions.

That is the most retarded thing I've read all week. This is suggesting that sexual harrassment is an absolutely objective law of the universe and is a scientific process.

>She'd feel very bothered by it, from her point of view she's experiencing sexual harassment.
And she's wrong. Also you just contradicted your own viewpoint a second ago that sexual harrassment isn't defined by the victim.

>That means each individual confession is an act of sexual harassment.
Confessing that you have feelings for someone isn't sexual harrassment unless you, the confessor, make it sexual harrassment. If you say, "Hey I have romantic feelings towards you and I would like to take you on a date if you feel the same way." That's not sexual harassment. It's sexual harrassment if it's repeated or if it sexual in nature, i.e "Hey I think you've got a good body, want to go on a date?"

>any expression of romantic or sexual interest is an act of sexual harassment
You need to get outside more. If you think this, you genuinely need to see a psychologist, I'm not being condescening or facetious, you have a problem with how you view yourself and others.

> if you say hi to a woman and she feels sexually harassed, but you had no such intent behind it, then she was not experiencing sexual harassment, even if she feels that way.
And now you just contradicted yourself again.

First you said that sexual harrassment is a universal law, regardless of the victims feelings.

Then you said that sexual harrassment is defined by the victim.

Then you said again that sexual harrassment is not defined by the victims feelings.

Get help.

>> No.10654078 [View]
File: 41 KB, 728x653, 2312bb30f583b7e278e8ac66f3f6601c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10654078

>>10653232
I'm a dude. I like lolita because it's more fun and interesting than the standard archetypes of modern dress of
>Art Hoe
>The 1950s with a twist.
>Sweatpants and uggs
>active wear
>clubbing attire
I like history and lolita has very obvious Baroque and Rococo influences. I like that it's a serious hobby and not a trend. It's like the model trainset but for women; the level of quality for lolita things is nice because...high quality things are just nice? I don't know how to explain it. I can appreciate craftsmanship and effort without actually needing to like the thing. Niche hobbies are just interesting to observe.

But in the same way I'm not going to buy a model trainset, I'm not going to buy a dress. I'll just ask my friend who has a model trainset my questions when they come and listen to him when he wants to splurge model train information.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]