/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>8020942
Ah yes, hundreds of years in learning how to fight disease through bodily fluid containment and then we decide to repeat this shit because of the "patriarchy".

I feel the suffragettes rolling in their graves right about now.

>frequent CGL B/S/T threads
>saw items I wanted
>Email seller and pay for item
>Seller says they will go to ship it and give me a tracking number
>Not hear back for a week, send email
>No response for another week, send another email
>Finally get really frustrated, begin Paypal Dispute
>Still no fucking answer and almost another fucking week later

I'm about to escalate the claim because even though I didn't put much money on the line, it's money I could use to buy something else. I don't want to name and shame either but the temptation is there.

>New to comm
>See idea for meetup
>At the fucking county fair that's dirty and grimey and just unsavory people. For a shot on the carousel.

What. The fuck. We might as well go find a mall or zoo with a carousel and take a shot there. Atleast there's less of a chance of getting precious burando ruined.

>>7667301
Your English is piss poor for one thing.
>of this low end mascaras
If you're going to say the 'chemical will make my eyelashes fall out', then do us the favor and state which chemical oh so 'intelligent' McCunty.

Secondly, here's the list of ingredients as according to Boots, the maker of said product.

EXCEPTIONAL DEFINITION MASCARA - ALL SHADES
Aqua (Water), Cera alba (Beeswax), Silica, Paraffi n, Polyurethane-34, Glyceryl stearate, Copernicia cerifera (Carnauba) wax, Butylene glycol, Stearic acid, Palmitic acid, Triethanolamine, Phenoxyethanol, Tocopheryl acetate, Methylparaben, Aminomethyl propanol, Xanthan gum, Hydroxyethylcellulose, Hydrolyzed soy protein, Ethylparaben, Hydrolyzed keratin, Panthenol, Sodium benzoate,
Sorbic acid, [+/- (May contain) CI 77499 (Iron oxides), CI 77492 (Iron oxides), CI 77491 (Iron oxides).]

Now, the chemical I can tell that is most 'controversial' are the two parabens. There is evidence of paraben sensitivity, BUT it was proved by US National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health that these Parabens do not have many adverse affects.

>Acute toxicity studies in animals indicate that parabens are not significantly toxic by various routes of administration. Subchronic and chronic oral studies indicate that parabens are practically nontoxic.

If you'd like read up on my source, which is a proper source and not just some shitty beauty site, feel free to.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19101832

Now, you got any 'smart' retort, cunt? Or are you gonna fuck that up too?