[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

Search:


View post   

>> No.10268397 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10268397

>>10268381

>> No.10253624 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10253624

>>10253555
than why the fuck are you here, Sheila??

>> No.10218393 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10218393

>>10218321
>how very dare you
ero chan is cute and thicc with pouty lips.

>> No.10136836 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10136836

>>10136788
nayrt I just want you to know that in spite of all your tryhard spacewasting, you do not know much about the fashion at all. you're inexperienced and will only spew uninformed opinions until you become self aware.
It's painfully obvious how new you are. good luck growing out of your ita phase.

>> No.10099672 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10099672

>>10098666
oh screw off. lolita is a fashion that works for variable sizes and lolita absolutely still suits her. my issue is her current style direction is fricking weird and I have no clue what her inspo is. I am hoping she is in a transitional phase and that her make-up starts matching her coords and becomes more flattering. I like her experiments and I want to see more attention to detail from her.
that being said, I can also screw off because she can wear whatever and who am I to tell her to dress for my pleasure?

>> No.9980515 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9980515

>>9980421
you're definitely in the wrong subculture if seeing different cuts isn't important to you. it's not 6 posts about the same dress.

>> No.9897679 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9897679

so...
>entitled minor excited to impress big sis interrupts lolita for a pic, who obviously looked like she was in the middle of doing something time-sensitive and difficult
>lolita agrees to pic and is forced to burden friend with the load she herself is responsible for
>little brat gets pic but complains that lolita was a jerk, expecting her to be inhumanly accommodating and a literal doormat for attention, even though she's been working the con for days
>big sister, a conniving jerk, likely self-loathing and jealous, blasts this skewed and immature narrative across online communities

wow.

>> No.9808867 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9808867

>>9808571
>a huge overlap with the DDLG
you couldn't be more of an ignorant, troglodyte homunculus.
Lolita is gorgeous and pure and you're probably just jealous and too horrible at money management to enjoy it.

the fashion has nothing to do with actual practice of any fetish

>> No.9520385 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, 1494185898727.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9520385

>>9519530
It's not an actual lolita silhouette and doesn't follow the rules. Latex is literally fetish clothes, and is commonly used in a substyle of gothic fashion that is heavily fetish inspired. If you can't see how the tacky red and black colorscheme, flower crown, cheap necklace, corset and makeup make this more gothic than lolita then you are blind. Just because she wore it to an event doesn't make it lolita. Hypothetically, you could use latex in a lolita coord, I don't know why you would want to unless you're a fetishist though as it's not a material that suits the aesthetic at all, but this is not the way to do it. It looks like an etsy sissy dress.

>> No.9476458 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9476458

>>9476351
HA do you throw that around every time you're wrong?
>>9468738
>classic blouse with mock high neck
>jsk with pintucks, floral lace, normal waist bodice
>simple thin-strap mary jane's with short heel
>simple clean bag

with different styling a.k.a. accessories this could be made sweet. but she didn't coord this jsk in a sweet way at all. with a different blouse, and better quality headdress, lace and shape wise, this could be okay old school.

big hair does not equal OTT sweet, fucknuts.

>> No.9466889 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9466889

>>9465507
>>9464417
>>9464279

this thread is a joke.
let me drop some actual itas for y'all motherfuckers

>> No.9430674 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9430674

>>9428754
>waah! anonymous bullying!1
>browses cgl

>> No.9400476 [View]
File: 387 KB, 674x337, anonpls.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9400476

>>9400442
if that horrid yellow lighting wasn't tinting everything you'd see that none of these blacks actually match. the pin on the hat is the worst.

if she wasn't calling this lolita, I might think it was cute.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]