/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9700183]

C-can chainlink really reach $100? The memes about 1k I don’t believe... I don’t know if I have the iron hands to hold to even 100 if that could happen

[Anonymous No.9700200]

>>9700183
I always had a really it could hit $100 eoy, but just have to wait and see. Mainnet feels to be in coming in the next 10weeks.

[Anonymous No.9700201]

>>9700183
Why can’t you hold if you didn’t invest more than you can afford? Read the white paper. See the working partnership they have with swift. See that swift is working with 12,000+ banks, that send millions of messages per day, etc. Then look at the derivitives market... data is the new gold faggot, LINK stands be the go to transactor for digital gold. I mean it’s pretty clear to me. Even brainlets will use LINK and not even know it, just like we all use swift whenever we transfer money.

[Anonymous No.9700203]

>>9700200
>next 10weeks
actually it's closer to 2019

[Anonymous No.9700211]

>>9700200
Main net is coming in September, it has been stated in multiple threads.

[Anonymous No.9700214]

>>9700183
100 usd implies 100 billion market cap.

Thats more than ethereum currently has. If you really think a fuckimg erc 20 token will have a higher mcap than eth itself, you may be in for a surprise.
This coin will.be lucky to hit 1 usd ever again

[Anonymous No.9700216]

>>9700201
It's not about losing more than I can afford to. My biggest nightmare is I hold through the top and lose it all or something. hold me /biz/

[Anonymous No.9700218]

>>9700201
Feels like newfaggots don't realise the whole swift dealings because linkies don't talk about it as much as we once did

>>9700203
We will have to wait and see, I always thought it would be closer to the end of to year but as things go on feel it could be alot closer

[Anonymous No.9700224]

>>9700211
September comes after August, usually.

[Anonymous No.9700227]

>he actually fell for the link meme
its a running gag here. nobody actually holds it. exit scam is far more likely than mainnet

[Anonymous No.9700229]

>>9700211
by people who are just guessing. the team hasn't confirmed anything.

[Anonymous No.9700249]

>>9700214
>doesn't understand the concept of token sequestration or the difference between total supply and circulating supply.

90-95% of link will be staked in nodes and not in circ. Eventually almost all of those tokens will be staked in nodes. what happens when link circ supply is 25-75 million?

[Anonymous No.9700259]

I'd actually be extremely surprised if it doesn't reach 100$ eoy.

t. assblaster

[Anonymous No.9700260]

>>9700216
It’s gonna be alright anon. Keep accumulating. The FUD is the final test. I know it’s hard just to step away and delete delta or blockfolio, but just know that you’re gonna make it. It may seem to good to be true, but that’s just how it is. I am a poorfag and somehow a top 1000 holder, so Imagine all the people in your life who have no idea the impact smart contracts will have in society. Sometimes you’re just in the right place at the right time.

[Anonymous No.9700266]

>>9700229
The team says you will know when we go live not before. But it will likely be ready in or before September. Swift wants to start making money on their new revenue channel.

[Anonymous No.9700268]

>>9700224
damn, you know your shit.

I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning

[Anonymous No.9700270]

>>9700218
That’s why the new FUD is so effective for the anons who haven’t DYOR.

[Anonymous No.9700301]

>>9700249
this is the big wild card where all forecasting breaks down.

anyone with half a brain will be staking their link tokens. reward tokens for data retrieval would possibly sold on the market as passive income to people who are wanting to acquire enough tokens to stake on a node, but this means that tokens paid for data retrieval would probably eventually find their way to being staked as well. this could mean that the market could dry up quickly for link tokens which could make the price skyrocket. if the demand for data-and thus link tokens- is high enough on the chainlink network, singularity is a very real possibility.

it's anyone's guess as to how the link token economics will play out but surely it will be interesting for anyone who holds link.

[Anonymous No.9700311]

it wont even be 1$ eoy

[Anonymous No.9700312]

>>9700270
Swift is going to make sooo much money with the assistance of Link.

[Anonymous No.9700357]

>>9700301
here is my guess, btw imma optimist. fwiw.

swift will hold the majority. how big I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised for it to be at least 150mil link all for staking. Thing is, swift could have 3 times that. Thats the biggest wildcard imo.

Next comes IBM, Microsoft, salesforce, docusign, intellect EU, b3i, and im guessing some payment proccessors, gambling, and other big fish, f100 type companies. They will get the remaining link. Assume anything swift doesnt use, these organizations will acquire whats left.


That leaves just us. Someone speculated biz only had 5-10% of link sold in the ico, the rest is insiders, investors, etc. This is all smart money, so we know they know the real money is in staking and long term holds. So i dont expect much budging here as the only ameture money in is biz and they are the most die hard contingent of the whole thing. So i dont expect much movement here anytime before meme prices. and even then it will only be a small portion.


lasty, we have everyone else, all the normies, f5000 companies, and emerging industries will be clamoring for our seemingly majic value accumulator. Cap this shit frens, 2028 Chainlink will be worth 100k/ roken.

[Anonymous No.9700358]

>>9700260
I wish this was true

T. 43k links :/

[Anonymous No.9700389]

>>9700249
>what happens when link circ supply is 25-75 million?
If this is the case then /biz/ will have to meme the fuck out of that tiny supply to drive up the feeling of scarcity and FOMO among the normies.

[Anonymous No.9700393]

>>9700301
“Interesting” is a good way to put it. I said to my brother today, I can’t wait to see how this plays out, to learn to trust my intuition or not and to see the world change technologically. Not to mention potentially bankrupt/make a millionaire out of me.

[Anonymous No.9700406]

>>9700389
see>>9700357

[Anonymous No.9700535]

>>9700358
It is true, it’s the universe bringing balance to itself.

[Anonymous No.9700548]

How come link is the most talked about coin on biz.like crazy shill here.all the fucking time.i own zero.and i dont know if you guys are sarcastique or not.

[Anonymous No.9700561]

>>9700548
dyor no one cares if you figure it out or not

[Anonymous No.9700570]

>>9700561
In fact, no one's actually figured much out themselves.

[Anonymous No.9700585]

>>9700357
>2028 Chainlink will be worth 100k/ roken.
In 2028 there will be newer better tech replacing chainlink. If chainlink isn't at least $100 in the next few years, we're fucked.

[Anonymous No.9700598]

>>9700570
>24 yr old boomer who relies on others for financial investment information

[Anonymous No.9700617]

>>9700214
It isn't ERC20. You don't even know what ERC20 is.

[Anonymous No.9700629]

>>9700585
no, first mover into fintech, backed by the major players in all spaces financial and data driven, it is an infrastructure not a website. This tech will be the backend of enterprise smart contracts for decades to come. Its not an independent company with a cool tech. It is the major industries of the worlds personal project to solve the oracle problem and allow for fully automated trustless interaction. It will be the standard as solving the oracle problem is a binary outcome. There is no such thing as sovling the oracle problem better. Once it is solved there is no need to improve upon the function.

[Anonymous No.9700637]

>>9700629
What about the Chainlink network but with racing stripes?

[Anonymous No.9700662]

>>9700629
yfw they shilled it on biz not only to raise capital but because from the top they are lonely and wanted to see the sad people of biz make it.

tfw the enemy was your biggest believer of all time

[Anonymous No.9700682]

>>9700183
no

[Anonymous No.9700716]

>>9700629
This board doesn’t deserve you anon, no homo.

[Anonymous No.9700743]

>>9700629
>muh first mover
Good luck with that. The only reason you have an advantage with first mover is when it's centralized so you literally own the entire market so long as you don't fuck up. Or do you honestly think bitcoin will still be relevant in 10 years outside of maybe two massive legacy mining operations?

[Anonymous No.9700757]

>>9700716
thanks fren

>>9700743
holy fuck, that's some tasty looking b8 ya got there. Thanks tho, I am on a diet.

[Anonymous No.9700760]

>>9700682

Circulating supply man

[Anonymous No.9700766]

>>9700743
How do you get through life being so stupid?

[Anonymous No.9700796]

>>9700268
This guy is
Wokie !

[Anonymous No.9701016]

>>9700585
Guy in the 90's
>in the 2000's there will be much better technology than Microsoft windows.
Maybe there will be, but you know the rest of the history.

[Anonymous No.9701257]

Even if it hit's ATH that's a 3x which is more than enough for me.

[Anonymous No.9701598]

>>9700183
Link will reach $100-200 before 2020 is over.

[Anonymous No.9701744]

>>9700629
>It will be the standard as solving the oracle problem is a binary outcome. There is no such thing as sovling the oracle problem better. Once it is solved there is no need to improve upon the function.

Thanks for the wow moment anon.

[Anonymous No.9701821]

Regarding price.. whether assblaster was a larp or not. He talked about dividend price and speculative price.

So lets say the dividend price is 40 dollars.. the speculative price could still see it do a 5x from there and back down again.

[Anonymous No.9701863]

>>9700183
>C-can chainlink really reach $100?

Yes. Only when mainnet releases can it be pumped. Why? It can't be viewed by the SEC as a security. After main net it is in the eyes of the SEC a utility token. Sergey had problems with the SEC with the assets.exchange platform. He knows what he is doing and he is right

This is why in links case in particular there is an extremely high chance of a BIG price spike after mainnet.

[Anonymous No.9701882]

You guys honestly still believe in this shitshow?

wauw

[Anonymous No.9701906]

just buy more link.
If you dont hold 50K linkies you shouldnt be called a linkmarine

[Anonymous No.9701968]

>>9701863
>Sergey had problems with the SEC with the assets.exchange platform.
Thats interesting info anon. Sauce?

[Anonymous No.9702008]

>>9700357
Riddle Anon here. This is what I'm thinking too. Companies anon mentioned will horde enough link for years and years to come. For me it's natural to compare Link to cocaine since I'm addicted to both. But lets take this comparison a bit further, there's a shit ton of cocaine in the factories of the amazonian jungle, the drug lords have an endless supply, but still I'm paying 100$ a gram in Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA.

[Anonymous No.9702032]

Read this article. Ask yourself if you think your understanding of chainlink and software development is more advanced than the authors. If so maybe you are more qualified than they are to estimate. But 2-3 years with a $10-$20 is what most people think.

https://medium.com/@signal_capital/https-medium-com-signal-capital-our-investment-in-chainlink-15ab90ee9c02

[Anonymous No.9702107]

>>9700662
What if the real moon missions were the frends we made along the way?
>Smilingpepe.jpg

[Anonymous No.9702161]

15$

That is the amount I need it to be to become a millionaire. I honestly don't see it happening this year, but have good faith for 2019/2020. The oracle problem is real and if Sergey can solve it or at least come close to real world adoption, I see it happening.

[Anonymous No.9702349]

If main net is released in Sep, SIBOS2018 will spell as Smartcontracts International Banking Operations Seminar

[Anonymous No.9702351]

>>9702032
>But 2-3 years with a $10-$20 is what most people think.
This is such a middle-of-the-road sort of answer. Even with all tokens in circulation and the upper estimate ($20) this would still make LINK lower market cap than ripple and Ethereum

I see LINK as all or nothing. Either it becomes the go-to market leader oracle (like Ethereum is the go-to smart contracts/general dapp platform) or it doesn't. If it does then its market cap will be at least Ethereum's current market cap which would be like $60 per LINK with all tokens in circulation.

There's no (serious) competition in this space. And anyone who lurks these threads knows (with as much certainty as is possible without having it actually confirmed by the partners themselves) that LINK is in deep with the likes of DocuSign and Swift.

You can't jump half way over a chasm.

The possible scenarios as I see it are:
- Either the team somehow fucks up the product itself (unlikely) and the price stays in the $0.00 to $1 range for eternity
- Some competitor manages to leap-frog the years of research, networking and development that have gone into LINK to usurp its position and the price stays in the $0.00 to $1 range for eternity
- Successful main net launch and go-to oracle market leader, tentative testing by real world businesses increasing to mass adoption and the price goes $100+

The only scenario I envisage it hovering around $10-$20 is if it gets big on leddit or whatever and speculation pushes the price up in anticipation of main net. The point is if this thing works it's worth $100+. If it doesn't then it'll stay at the current price levels or any price increases will be purely speculative

[Anonymous No.9702358]

>>9700357
We're certainly not the major fish in the pond when it comes to LINK holdings, but something you said when referring to LINK struck a chord.

It's quite possible they are in fact the largest holders of LINK tokens outside of the immediate team. In fact, it would actually make a lot of sense given that SWIFT was in fact one of the largest and earliest supporters of Chainlink and SmartContracts.com well before an ICO was even raised.

Factor in the big fish like IBM, Salesforce, it's clear once LINK takes off, this rocket is bound for the moon.

The only sad part is that we truly weren't supposed to be in for the ride. Our retail money doesn't appeal to them.

So Anon, who's behind the FUD to scare us away from LINK? Seems like some sophisticated bunch has deliberately tried to steer us away from LINK's inevitable moon mission.

[Anonymous No.9702402]

> corps hold millions of LINK
> main net arrives
> smallest node needs 500k LINK to be competitive
> biztards can't even pool together to get one ok node
> only hope is to sell high
> link goes to $20
> corps make a massive dumping
> biztards follow to get their fiat profits
> corps buy back for cheap
> now each node is 10-100k LINK tops
> prices climb back up and beyond
> biz collectively jumps off bridge

[Anonymous No.9702436]

>>9702402
Many will not make it to the Singularity. They've been groomed to sell way before then.

[Anonymous No.9702440]

>>9700183
it already reached 1k in my heart

[Anonymous No.9702536]

Who knows. It could hit $5 it could hit $10k+. Circulating supply will diminish over time and the vast majority of Link will be consolidated into the hands of node operators. Now if the crypto market cap is 20 trillion down the road, and Link is top 5, imagine how insane the gains will be.

Link is a new protocol. It's not some shitty p&d, btc but bettur, or crypto with and obscure market goal and no purpose for the token. If all goes well, I expect at least antshare level gains at the worst. Nobody knows at the end of the day, but I think is the best shot out there and that's why I'm all in.

[ShiggyDiggy !!Ud23m/ZXm/r No.9702848]

>>9702008
holy fuck, its is you

[Anonymous No.9702867]

It will never reach $1000 eoy
The leader of the orthodox of Delphi has lost his way. He is now resorting to getting drunk crying about losing his farm. ChainLink is his only hope so he decided to make a sigil to impress his spiritual buddies in the group. He was so pleased with himself he got drunk and his wife wouldn't fuck him so he masturbated to the sigil and came up with this new idea for biz.

[Anonymous No.9702948]

>>9702436
this

[Anonymous No.9703002]

>>9702402
You must be new if you think there's not enough Link owners on biz to pool together 500k.

[Anonymous No.9703120]

What prevents swift (or some other company) to just buy the tech from MC Sergey and start their own completely owned alternative link oracle service? Leaving us with our chainlink tokens next to the worldwide use alternative Swiftlink network?

[Anonymous No.9703334]

>>9702867
The Oracle of Delphi was a scam. I wouldnt believe the Ancient one, let alone those discord faggots.

[Anonymous No.9703348]

>>9703120
A) Why would they do that when they already have the tech?

B) What do you mean by "completely owned"? Wouldn't that negate the benefits of decentralization?

[Anonymous No.9703417]

>>9703120
Look at website, chainlink works together with swift ON THEIR OWN ORACLE. LOL

[Anonymous No.9703484]

>>9702402
Stupid. Biz owns millions of link. I'm a casual who doesn't even give a fuck and I have 5k link. Don't underestimate. Never underestimate

[Anonymous No.9703503]

>>9703417
Having their own Oracle doesn't rule out them actually using the Chainlink network. You understand that, right?

[Anonymous No.9703552]

>>9703417
and chainlink is a network of oracles. Swift could one of the biggest API suppliers / node operators in this novice market place.

[Anonymous No.9703565]

>>9703552
could be*

[Anonymous No.9703670]

>>9703565
Will be*

[Anonymous No.9703674]

>>9703670
is*

[Anonymous No.9703689]

>>9703674
Well played

[Anonymous No.9703790]

One days it's all FUD. And today it's all positive. I smell the shit. Can't hide from us pajeets.

[Anonymous No.9703791]

>>9700637
sure that's a racing stripe, if you consider diarrhea to be a sport.

[Anonymous No.9703798]

>>9700229

true, the team hasn't confirmed anything, but we've been able to make educated estimates based on the pivotal tracker, and they land us at august-september mainnet release

117 items in the ice box, the team completes on average 12 items per week (median is 13), this puts us at about 2.5 months to complete everything in the icebox, and we also know for a fact that not even close to everything within the ice box needs to be completed for mainnet to go live. if they really busted ass they could get this out in july.

[Anonymous No.9703837]

>>9702436
this. "tonight", the night we've been waiting for, will come and we'll be told to sell. it's finally tonight goy, it's happening, sell sell sell.

[Anonymous No.9703843]

>>9702402

> smallest node needs 500k LINK to be competitive
> biztards can't even pool together to get one ok node

nigga, i guarantee you there's more than 500k worth of link held amongst anons in this thread alone

t. lieutenant colonel

[Anonymous No.9703902]

>>9703843
only have 9.8k stinkers, thinking about liquidating my ENG to up my stack to 12k

[Anonymous No.9704351]

>>9700548
Its all just ironic memes bro..dont fall for it. Invest in other better tokens/coins.

[Anonymous No.9704405]

>>9704351
The meme is real, go fuck yourself fudder.

[Anonymous No.9704425]

Lads pls answer
how many LINK to retire in 2020-2022?
~5M GDP??

most compelling answer get's 500 LINK

[Anonymous No.9704440]

>>9704425
45k

[Anonymous No.9704466]

>>9704405
I feel sorry for you, actually buying into ironic memes. Poor sucker. Oh well.

[Anonymous No.9704475]

>>9704466
ironic dub dubs of truth!!!

[Anonymous No.9704478]

>>9700214
Lurk moar

>dat horrible math

[Anonymous No.9704496]

>>9703902
If the Lord wanted you to be a higher rank he wouldn't have spawned you in Mumbai.

[Anonymous No.9704525]

>>9703417
how new are you? lol...pathetic

[Anonymous No.9704530]

>>9704440
ur the only one who replied so u win i guess
post address

[Anonymous No.9704538]

>>9700183
Here’s the straight dope OP. If Link lives up to what it wants to be it will be the google of crypto currency. Bigger than anything we can picture. However, the testnet code was terrible and Sergey they tried to trademark smart contract through a sketchy shell company. any IP lawyer (of which I am definitely one) will tell you will never pass federal scrutiny because it is insufficiently arbitrary and is the definition of a weak mark. It looked terrible. If Sergey is a multimillionaire he needs to have better representation than that. Right now Link looks like a gigantic bag but the team doesn’t run its mouth publicly so they have a chance of fixing it. I bought myself a 1.1k stack as a thank you to 4chan for how much money it made me so I am a #neversell low level link marine and my link is on a MEW wallet ready for the staking. But if you ask me personally does the project’s implementation look as good as its concept? Absolutely not.

[Anonymous No.9704703]

>>9704530
>>9704425
100k if it reaches 100 you have 10 million. 0x8e066bfe5caef322b87583e5bb988acddf5d6bca

[Anonymous No.9704729]

>>9704425
10m LINKS. Im 100% sure

[Anonymous No.9704821]

I'm all giggled up since the "prepare for mainnet" thing in github. the alpha release came quickly after steve did it last time with "prepare for testnet". we can relax soon, frens.

[Anonymous No.9704911]

>>9702351
kek

[Anonymous No.9705442]

>>9704466
You got shit in your mouth or something? You eat shit for breakfast today? Fuck yourself, fudding bitch.

[Anonymous No.9705654]

>>9700629
I just loooove my Linkies man

[Anonymous No.9705682]

>>9702402
>100k link reporting in...

[Anonymous No.9705721]

>>9704425
You need about 500 link for that. Like I do, for this.
0x199efbFCCE43Fa755362E2c44c7e01e87cc35831

[Anonymous No.9705726]

I hope it works out for you guys, I really do. But in all of the research I've done nothing really positive comes out of Chainlink.

Most of the promises are ideological and there are current blockchain limitations in terms of scalability concerns.

EOS is also facing similar consequences in terms of scalability as they will be against the same hurdles Ethereum has already faced and is now trying to fix.

Unless they opt for a federated network like Stellar I don't see them succeeding long-term. There's a lot of projects that are much more promising that aren't attached to uncertainties and FUD like LINK.

I'm not saying it isn't going to pump, look at VERGE. Shitcoins are bound to make you money. But try to be a little more conservative with your outlooks of the technology before promising such an incredible appreciation in valuation in a market that is just now starting to crack down on regulations.

This is a speculative market that is slowly transitioning into a space that is finally starting to look at projects that actually work rather than hype whitepapers alone.

You're still going to get pumps, but the days near closer and closer each day until the shitcoin pruning happens.

I don't know if I would hedge my bets into LINK.

[Anonymous No.9705734]

>>9704425
10k and you can live off node profits for a lifetime.
Check em.

[Anonymous No.9705744]

Chainlink official twitter is on the move. Looks like they unfollowed Adrienne Borders, who was a social studies teacher (I think, please correct me if I'm wrong). https://twitter.com/chainlink/following

[Anonymous No.9705747]

I CANT HANDLE ONE MORE OUNCE OF BULLSHIT I NEED A SHITLOAD OF MONEY IN ORDER TO WITHDRAW FROM SOCIETY AND CONDUCT MY...........RESEARCH

[Anonymous No.9705766]

>>9705744
Oh, nvm, it appears as if she deleted her twitter account. Her brother or husband was a lawyer of some law firm Sergey retained right? I forget the connection.

https://twitter.com/msaborders?lang=en

[Anonymous No.9705768]

>>9704821
Can you link that thread anon? Haven't been following all the link threads daily lately

[Anonymous No.9705792]

>>9705766
I remembered, it was Christopher Borders http://borderslawgroup.com/.. Sergey has a testimonial on their website. I guess this deletion is meaningless though.

[Anonymous No.9705822]

>>9703843
I can confirm. I over slightly over a million LINK personally to run a node.

[Anonymous No.9705837]

>>9700216
>My biggest nightmare is I hold through the top and lose it all
If you have short term thinking with LINK you aren't going to make it, unless you hold 100k+. This isn't buying a buzzword shitcoin in early 2017 and hoping you sell the top at the EOY speculation bubble. This is buying BTC in 2009-2010.

I feel really bad for the LINKlets that are gonna sell in 2019 for a few hundred grand thinking 'It won't get any better than this!'. Imagine selling all your Bitcoin in 2012, or all your ETH in 2016.

[Anonymous No.9705895]

>>9702008
big difference is cocaine has a regenerating supply. It linear in its life cycle. Starts as a plant, ends as a hangover shit or a bloody booger. Link is like an environment with massive amounts of interacting within. That interaction can grow over time, but control of tokens as a form of access is incredibly finite. For that reason, I think link has flippening capabilities. People will say I am deluded, but when you conceive/visualize how this thing will interact its almost like it is the fountain of youth, but instead of youth it grants you savings, automations, and monetized data. Monkey see monkey do markets will follow the big boys into the environment and eventually it will be like and exclusive club/restaurant, or neighborhood. Space with be scarce, highly sought, and increasingly valuable. Industrial fomo is something crypto has yet to see. As a former military contractor, I can tell you the money of industrial fomo is unlike anything this space has ever seen. Many other coins will do well in the wake of Links success, but none will hold the value of environment that link does. Last thing of note, nothing since SaaS, has had the ability to this quickly integrate into this many industries. Assuming all connections laid out in previous posts are real, this type of collaboration between the business and finance giants involved would be the biggest of its kind ever. That's in the age of Kraft/Heinze mergers. In the future it is very likely in some regards people will refer to time historically as before link and after link. Hold hard lads. Our dreams are but a distant tomorrow.

[Anonymous No.9705898]

>>9704821

>I'm all giggled up since the "prepare for mainnet" thing in github.

Proof? I remember a thread the other day where people were excitedly talking about something that appeared on the github and then was removed shortly after but no one would say what it was. I assumed it was anons just being cheeky.

[Anonymous No.9705933]

>>9702032
>believes the fud blog written by the whale who is likely paying pajeets to poo on the best project in the history of the space, so he can accumulate more stinkys making himself a fortune and leaving you a broke suicidal nolinker.

Never gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.9705948]

so lets assume it manages to pull off everything it wanted. Wont 10000$ EOY 22 be very realistic?

[Anonymous No.9706052]

>>9705898

I saw a screenshot, but didn't save it.

I guess it could be faked, but there were a lot of anons saying it was real.

[Anonymous No.9706064]

>>9702358
its a wild world anon, lots of bad people with lots of bad intentions. I know for a fact, a good portion of the "meme" about secret groups working to fud link is a blended truth. It is true some are4 paid to fud link, but theose one are pajeet fudders and their end product is weak and easily defeatable, bbit actually had the opposite intended effect. They wanted it to demoralize and cause us to sell, instead it immunized us to any fud as we assembled in the name of autism and internet correctness to prove them wrong. After proving the pajeet paid fudders something happened though. Galvanized in our defense of the project some holder at the top of the heap intellectually started to see the benefit the whales saw in fudding link for cheaper buy ins. Difference between these guys and the normie whales is these guys are high lvl 4chan autists born in the fire of the internet's colosseum. These anons knew how to really fud, they knew how to meme, they knew the soft spots in the community, and they set out to fud our beloved token with 4-7D chess strategies. Know this, they are isolated, vindictive, but intelligent outliers. They are not a collected group nor are they a secret society. Lots a hoopla about certain tweets lately, which we're a bit odd, but from what I know of the origin of the tweets, their is no certainty even in knowing who is actually behind it much less if it is actually related to those people or not. I would assume it is a collection of circumstance that makes it seem as though there are many trying to get our stinkys, but it is truly only a few deranged madlads who got bitten by the link bug and couldn't get enough. To me that's more of a bull flag than n e thing. If you sell, you weren't smart enough to become that rich anyway.

[Anonymous No.9706111]

>>9702867
>>9703334
astro samefagging from his 4chan gold pass. sad.

[Anonymous No.9706116]

>>9705933
>>9706064
mein nigga

[Anonymous No.9706125]

All I know is FUCK AGRIN GO. I swear to god this fucker is trying to take down the ChainLink project. FUCK HIM. All he does is talk bullshit this isn't the first time. I literally hate this fucker and if I didn't want to get kicked out of the main telegram I'd tell this nigger to fuck off back to Africa with his 500 link stack.

[Anonymous No.9706140]

All argin go does is take shots at Rory and the team. I'm fuckin tired of his shit. Fuck this guy.

[Anonymous No.9706157]

>>9705948
maybe not 2022, but who knows, thing move fast in this space and the token sequestration will be something that has yet to be seen. id say 1-5K is a safe bet for 2022.

[Anonymous No.9706175]

>>9706157
Are you talking about ChainLink? kek

[Anonymous No.9706186]

>>9705837
acknowledged

[Anonymous No.9706192]

>>9706125
just leave the telegram, literally nothing important happens there and it like all telegram channels is 99% pajeets.

[Anonymous No.9706201]

>>9706157
I'd have 1 billion fucking dollars lmfao

[Anonymous No.9706209]

>>9706175
no im talking about chains link, sorry for the confusion.

[Anonymous No.9706235]

>>9706201
Thanks for jynxing it idiot

[Anonymous No.9706239]

>>9706157
this is precisely why I am talking about 2022. It all depends on how much Link manages to achieve.

>>9706201
well if they pull of what they wont, sure why not.

[Anonymous No.9706327]

>>9701906
50k links costs 17,000$ right now
who the fuck can afford that

[Anonymous No.9706333]

>>9700760
350m

[Anonymous No.9706405]

>>9706333
Will be <50 million in curculating supply once they are all locked in nodes and node operators accumulate Link over time, and maybe much less that that

[Anonymous No.9706409]

>>9706125
Chainlink could be rebranded two days before mainnet and easliy throw off any 'damaging content' if needed.

What a fuckhead.

[Anonymous No.9706443]

>>9706327

people who bought btc or eth a year or more ago

[Anonymous No.9706460]

>>9706443
not really dude bitcoin was still like 400$ for like 5 years

the average person could only afford a few coins at that price

you would need to have bought bitcoin in 2009 to be able to spend 17000 on this

[Anonymous No.9706468]

>>9706405
winner winner chicken dinner

[Anonymous No.9706597]

>>9706405
how much per node ? kek

[Anonymous No.9706612]

>>9706460

Wrong, I bought 4 Bitcoin at $400. Sold it all and the BCash I got for 100% Link. Got a lot more than $17k.

[Anonymous No.9706642]

>>9706612
maybe if youre all in but its pretty ignorant to assume everyone can put down 17k

thats a down payment on a house

[Anonymous No.9706682]

>>9706460

depends when you sold to get into link. i bought btc at like $1k maybe like three years ago and sold at like $18k back in december 2017 to get my link. i have more than 50k

in january 2017 btc was about $1k. if you bought two back then and were still holding today you'd have about $15k. if you bought $2k worth of eth back in january 2017 when it was ~$10 you'd of course be far better off

[Anonymous No.9706698]

>>9706682
ya but even for someone with a 50k net worth thats already borderline making it imo

and youre willing to spend half your net worth on this? lol

dont you have like bills or anything you have to pay i would spend maximum 10k if i had that much you just have to be reasonable

[Anonymous No.9706777]

>>9706698

>50k net worth

50k what?

>thats already borderline making it imo

if you're talking about $50k, you must either be a kid of retarded because that's not even close to making it. maybe if you move to the third world it's making it

>and youre willing to spend half your net worth on this? lol

this isn't half my net worth. look, if you want to make it you have to take calculated risks. i've only put $4k of my own money into crypto and whatever gains i've made i've reinvested. if link goes to zero, ya that'd suck, but my lifestyle and financial well being don't change. i have a big boy job, i don't rely on this to pay my bills.

[Anonymous No.9706832]

>>9706777
im saying if you made 50k from bitcoin and you spent 17k on this i think thats pretty irresponsible

>because that's not even close to making it.

According to a 2017 GOBankingRates survey, more than half of Americans (57 percent) have less than $1,000 in their savings accounts.

Here's the percentage of the 8,000 survey respondents who have:

$0 saved: 39 percent
Less than $1,000 saved: 18 percent
$1,000 to $4,999 saved: 12 percent
$5,000 to $9,999 saved: 6 percent
$10,000 or more saved: 25 percent

[Anonymous No.9706835]

>>9706642
You don't just go cash all-out in crypto. Not yet at least. So if you only have 17k in crypto your only option is keep investing. I myself only have 20k link because I only bought some BTC when it was $2k and even though that 20k link could have afforded me a down payment on a house at one point or a new car it's not like that was actually realistically possible.

[Anonymous No.9706844]

>>9706405
As price rises you'll need less link to operate a node so it's a double edged sword.

[Anonymous No.9706853]

>>9700548
if you don'T hold link you are not a true /bizraeli

[Anonymous No.9706869]

>>9706832
Who keeps money in a savings account to make .1% a year on your money kek

[Anonymous No.9706878]

>>9706642

It's pretty ignorant to think 17k in cryptocurrency is a lot of money. Unless you literally started buying shit in december, it's nothing. I know you're bitter about your 1.40 link, but please don't project that to everyone else.

[Anonymous No.9706923]

>>9706835
>I myself only have 20k link
>only

m8 i work minimum wage job i have 1k link

>>9706878
17k is a lot of money period

i see stupid shit like "i only have 50k link"

well you have more money than 75% of the population just in magic meme points

http://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-the-average-american-has-in-their-savings-account-2018-2

>Americans under 35 have about $1,580 saved, while those making $70,000 to $114,999 have about $5,400 saved.

[Anonymous No.9706926]

>>9706878
17k in crypto? lol I have 25k just in link alone

[Anonymous No.9706938]

>>9706832

i have more than 50k link and i only spent $4k of my own money to get it, that's what i'm saying. if the price of link goes to zero i am still very well off, nothing changes for me

yes, you'll be well off with $50k in savings relative to the majority of americans, who are financially irresponsible and live in a state of debt slavery, but this isn't quite the same thing as making it. making it is becoming financially independent, no longer having to work. you cannot do this with $50k in the united states

[Anonymous No.9706959]

I'm fairly certain it'll hit 100 easily. It's strange because that's not enough for me. I don't want 7 figures. I want 8.

[Anonymous No.9706979]

>>9706938
> financially irresponsible
>spends half his money on meme points

m8 just because you only spent cash doesnt mean you dont have 50k sitting there

you can probably afford to work less than most people you wont be wage slaving hard

[Anonymous No.9706987]

>>9706923

>m8 i work minimum wage job i have 1k link

you're going to make it

>17k is a lot of money period
>i see stupid shit like "i only have 50k link"

i agree, this is dumb

[Anonymous No.9706991]

>>9706844
So? Say the average node has around $10k staked, which is roughly 28k link right now. When Link is at $100, you could be running and collecting on 280 nodes rather than one.

There will be those who sell their full stacks, those who sell all staking returns, and those who sell a portion or none of the staking returns. In time, almost all Link will be consolidated into the hands of the last group. It may take a while, but it will happen

[Anonymous No.9707013]

>>9706979

>spends half his money on meme points

nigger, i haven't spent even 3% of my net worth of meme points. don't assume i'm you

>you can probably afford to work less than most people you wont be wage slaving hard

i can and do work less than most people. don't assume i'm you

[Anonymous No.9707015]

>>9706923
Yea and the average person is financially retarded.

You are browsing a board that was plugged into a phenomenon that made a lot of us a lot of money and even more who got in slightly later a nice little sum. It's no surprise that a bunch of 20-30 year old white men have more financial sense than the average american and just happened to have lucked upon one incredible opportunity to make a ton of money last year.

Sorry you missed out. It may happen again. Quit being bitter you dumb faggot, and hold yourself to a higher standard than the "average american"

[Anonymous No.9707093]

>>9707013
if you make a million dollars on a roullette table starting with 100$ and its sitting on the table you still have a million dollars its not just freeroll money from there lol its still has the value of a million

>>9707015
im not bitter im saying stop complaining about only having 50k link when i only have 1k and most people dont have that much money saved period

its really delusional its like a millionaire saying he needs billions totally wrong perspective

[Anonymous No.9707117]

>>9707093
> if you make a million dollars on a roullette table starting with 100$ and its sitting on the table you still have a million dollars its not just freeroll money from there lol its still has the value of a million
youre just bitter, just admit it faggot. You've never seen your portfolio balloon from a few thousand to well into six figures. Yes it just feels like dumb meme points that you then go and and do stupid things with. Maybe one day you'll understand but until then shut the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.9707165]

So the consensus seems to be that you must accumulate 10k link to have fuck you money circa 2021-2022

[Anonymous No.9707217]

>>9707093

>if you make a million dollars on a roullette table starting with 100$ and its sitting on the table you still have a million dollars its not just freeroll money from there lol its still has the value of a million

yes, and if i lose it all i'm still well off because i only put in $100. i'm exposed to a very low level of risk and have an extremely high upside. what is your point? i should be worried? i should cash out because i already have a bunch of money?

[Anonymous No.9707238]

its ganna go to $60-70 then crash HARD to $10 during the altcoin purge, according to our holy prophet blaster of the asses peace be upon him

[Anonymous No.9707241]

>>9707217
Gambler's fallacy.
There is no such thing as "house money"
Money is money
Every bet on the roulette table, assuming it's a fair game, adds to the expected win for the casino and adds to the expected loss for you.

[Anonymous No.9707304]

>>9707238
Ab was fun to listen to, but all of his price predictions to date have been wrong.

[Anonymous No.9707349]

>>9707241

i'm talking about risk to my financial well being. the gambler's fallacy is "if something happens more frequently than normal during a given period, it will happen less frequently in the future".

let's say i walk into a casino with a net worth of $200k.

in one scenario i bet $100 and win $1MM. my net worth is now $1.2MM.

in another scenario i bet $100 and lose. my net worth is now slightly less than $200k.

never mind that comparing gambling to investing is in itself a fallacy, how is this not an insanely great deal for me in terms of risk exposure?

[Anonymous No.9707370]

>>9707349
Your net worth has nothing to do with the fact that you're expected to lose money with every bet, assuming an unrigged/fair game

[Anonymous No.9707474]

>>9707370

you're going too far down the rabbit hole of this gambling hypothetical. i'm not making a succession of bets, i've made one small investment of my own money into link and it will either make me a shit ton of money or it won't. in one scenario i'm rich and in the other my financial well being is totally unchanged. this is not that hard to understand.

[Anonymous No.9707676]

>>9704425
10000 if you actually hold til 2021

0xe763fd98e0bac3588f310d6d6b165f04a4e2f9cd

[Anonymous No.9707703]

>>9700760

with staking? Lol not likely

[Anonymous No.9707791]

>>9702008
It's 60$ just over in salinas, and the gang boys are too dumb to cut it over here

[Anonymous No.9707812]

>>9706869

So you think that doesn't count 401Ks or mutual funds etc. I was thinking no way I'm in 25% of the population with 10K or more. I work a pleb job as a server. The money isn't bad though could be better. Wtf do people spend money on? families are expensive maybe. I have cheap rent and living costs

[Anonymous No.9708029]

>>9700682
there isnt a single coin that is actually used for anything at the same time.

[Anonymous No.9708307]

>>9707304
he did caveat that he hated giving price predictions before he threw us the $3 end of may bone.

[Anonymous No.9708362]

>>9700183
nothing good about iron hands if it takes 10 years to get to $100

[Anonymous No.9708378]

>>9708362
The average stock portfolio only doubles ever 7 years. Even if it took 10 years you'd be beating virtually any investment you could make right now. I really hope it doesn't take 10 years though...

[Anonymous No.9708494]

>>9700183
Just buy enough to be satisfied if it ever happens. There's nothing wrong with taking a bet on autism.

You don't need to waste time in their larp threads tho or even follow the project.

[Anonymous No.9708712]

>>9702351
Well said anon. Well said.

[Anonymous No.9708728]

>>9702008
Wtf. I'm in Monterey. How many LINKies are in this small area?

[Anonymous No.9708745]

>>9700183

[Anonymous No.9708751]

>>9708029
yes there is, and its called bitcoin. its a digital currency

[Anonymous No.9708779]

>>9702358
>The only sad part is that we truly weren't supposed to be in for the ride. Our retail money doesn't appeal to them.

I fail to see the sad part

[Anonymous No.9708789]

[Anonymous No.9708817]

>>9707015
Well said. If you're goal is to be wealthier than well over 99% of Americans then you don't even need a 6-figure net worth. But most people here aspire to be financially independent before middle age so we're tin terms of at least 7-figures. Probably 8 in a few years.

[Anonymous No.9708851]

>>9706460
I bought 150 ETH in November of 2016. And traded my way up another couple hundred in 2017. I have 75k LINK now because this will have an ETH like explosion. I can see it. I'm considering buying more soon. I might clear out every DEX order book up to 0.0007. I might wait though, because I still think there is a couple of you weak handed faggots that will sell it to me cheaper by the end of the summer before mainnet.

[Anonymous No.9708902]

>>9700183
It could, but the entire crypto market would have to be in a very bullish state for that to happen

[Anonymous No.9708960]

>>9702351

exactly this

[Anonymous No.9709022]

>>9705726
Shift-Enter you reddit tier faggot. Get the fock outta here homo.

[Anonymous No.9709037]

>>9703120
The network effect faggot...chainlink will have nodes already running and forking to a new coin/business would be retarded...like you are aparently

[Anonymous No.9709059]

Kek at all you lowballer fudding faggots, go ahead and sell at $20. You be hanging yourselves while Im still holding well past $1000

[Anonymous No.9709168]

>>9705721
Stop begging you pajeet faggot

[Anonymous No.9709315]

>>9708789
salad of words, there are better link shill screen caps.

[Anonymous No.9709369]

>>9706327
Adults

[Anonymous No.9709403]

>>9700183

Absolutely.

There needs to be a decentralized oracle system to make smart-contracts actually viable for businesses.

ChainLink looks like it will be the first to be release, that's $100+ easily solely because of first mover Advantage.

[Anonymous No.9709421]

>>9709403
to make it to amazon level, you need have the last mover advantage, firing in all cylinders, as explained in Zero to One. I think that's why the team said theys have only one attempth to launch the mainnet. But one entity can be both

[Anonymous No.9709463]

i just want 15k link and forget about crypto for a few years but im poor lads
what do

[Anonymous No.9709471]

>>9709421

>you need have the last mover advantage

i have zero to one, but i never read through it all. what is this?

[Anonymous No.9709524]

>>9709471
there's a saying in business that goes like: "pioneers get sacrificed in the front lines" something like that.
that references the last mover advantage.

[Anonymous No.9709571]

>>9709471
it's about enterprises which bring value in distant-far future, so initially they run at loss without generating much cash flow. Read chapter 4, all good examples there.

[Anonymous No.9709594]

>>9709571
may not apply to decentralized systems though due to network effects. Business operations are still tied to microsoft windows despite its drawbacks.

[Anonymous No.9709620]

>>9709524
So Etherium if first mover then in your scenario anon

That’s why the chainlink team is blockchain agnostic. There aren’t hundreds of chainlink copycats like their are etherium copycats. Use your brain for me one time

[Anonymous No.9709671]

>>9709620
Baby I'm all for linkies, I was just replying to the other anon. That's what they say about traditional business.

[Anonymous No.9710330]

>>9704496
12k link in Mumbai will make him a fucking god.

[Anonymous No.9710510]

>>9700183
Yes it can and it will, people still don‘t realize that this is the God Protocol.

[Anonymous No.9710619]

>>9702402
142k & counting