LINKIES UNITED.

[Anonymous No.9545392]

>bearish market
>an insane amount of FUD daily
>mainnet still far away
>biz slowly losing hope

I’M NOT FUCKING SELLING. NOLINKERS ETERNALLY BTFO AND KYS. THIS IS THE CATALYST OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION.

[Anonymous No.9545436]

No one is loosing hope, it's mear FUD, shit terrible FUD at that.

$1000 eoy

[Anonymous No.9545443]

FAT AND GAY

[Anonymous No.9545465]

Sure broah, I'm cool but.. When exactly is Mainnet coming again?

[Anonymous No.9545468]

>>9545436
>loosing
>mear
Is this Grade A reverse FUD?

[Anonymous No.9545482]

>dropping on low volume
what could this possibly mean

[Anonymous No.9545491]

>>9545482
Bullish.

[Anonymous No.9545514]

>>9545482
People arent selling anymore. moon soon

[Anonymous No.9545524]

>>9545468
This is

We won’t know anything for sure until mainnet. Sergey knows that under the hostile SEC regulatory apparatus that he must maintain the idea that LINK is a decentralised utility token and not a security and once it has utility they can promote chainlink, but not before that, or it jeopardises the whole project

[Anonymous No.9545549]

IT IS THE WORST CRYPTO OF THE WEEK IDIOTS!
WHAT MORE IS IT NEEDED !?
WORST CRYPTO IN HISTORY !?
AND WE ARE GETTING THERE ALSO..
Y'all idiots..

[Anonymous No.9545611]

>>9545549

its been blowing off steam. now its oversold and ready to start climbing. those large stacks of cheap LINK won't be around forever so whales who've been waiting to buy in and saw those thin order books are going to start gobbling those up while they can. bots turned off + low volume pullback = bullish.

[Anonymous No.9546460]

>>9545524
Well, they got their marketing person.
Where's our campaign now?

[Anonymous No.9546503]

>>9546460
It will coincide with mainnet. As both my original post and the quote from rory said.

[Anonymous No.9546541]

>>9545611
cope

[Anonymous No.9546703]

Everyone is selling the news from the lost trademark. Will regroup around .35 and go back to .45. From there, it won't move until new partners are revealed

[Anonymous No.9546833]

>>9546703
Genius, not

[Anonymous No.9546950]

>>9545436
This. Anyone with sense realized you can't post about LINK on this board anymore without getting bombarded with braindead shit. The project is going very well and the future is looking bright.

[Anonymous No.9546952]

>>9545549
It's just all the stupid niggers selling. I bought some more.

[Anonymous No.9546974]

IM NOT FUCKING SELLING YOU PIECES OF SHITS

[Anonymous No.9546997]

>>9546952
same, we all gonna make it, got a fat stack and getting more on a daily basis, loving it.

[Anonymous No.9547133]

>>9545443
If it's fat and gay
It's Sergay!!

[Anonymous No.9547145]

How are Linkies so confident in an unfinished project? Because of a SWIFT POC about which no one has any details?

What does everyone base their confidence on? I’ve done my research and it seems like everything is just forced speculation. Am I missing something? (Please don’t just share that graphic with a bunch of big company logos...it means nothing. None of these companies are actual partners and there is no finished product).

I ran my own business and in doing so, I interacted with LOTS of huge corporations. None of that meant that I had a partnership or any relationship deeper than mere communication.

[Anonymous No.9547173]

I’m not even trying to FUD, I’m trying to find legitimate reasons as to where people garner such confidence in their investment...

[Anonymous No.9547193]

>>9545392
We need to maintain the shit tier quality FUD so we can tank this shit to <.30 again so we can buy a lot more

[Anonymous No.9547384]

>>9547193
You realize that by tanking the price of your investment and constantly tainting its name, you could be hurting the actual product’s future and reputation, right?

[Anonymous No.9547523]

>>9545392
It's pretty see-through. VPN faggots samefagging their own fud to give the impression of board consensus. The timing and the saturation of it just destroys its creibility

[Anonymous No.9547543]

>>9545392
It has been up until now a 'promising project'.

However this failure to achieve the trademark is a red flag for me. They seemed to have gone with decent lawyers who obviously didn't convince Sergey otherwise against this waste of resources and money (or maybe he just didn't listen!)

Did they SERIOUSLY expect to trademark the term 'SmartContract' ? A term that any crypto puddlebrain knows Nick Szabo coined over 20 years ago. Did Mark Oblad, the legal mastermind of smart contracts decide not to scratch his Dr Evil fucking head and halt Sergey from making this terrible move.

Also did you see the state of the fucking attachments in the application? Minimal fucking effort..... It was just screenshots of Crypto Geek.com and the SC.com website with a few duplications. The lack of effort is unbelievable for a project who prides itself on being for a 'corporate' audience. Another red flag. Of course the judge denied it.

Watch how embarrassing this episode will become as the wider Ethereum and crypto communities find out about it. As if the token wasn't a laughing stock already, every other crypto will be mispelling Smart Contract as smartcontract just to rub it in the faces of Link bag holders.

I mean is he going to try and trademark 'cryptocurrencies' next?! or what about fucking 'cheeseburgers'?! At his best he is hopeful at his least he is naive and distracted as a leader.

We have visibility from github that Steve and Dimitri are working there butts off (Until the past few days). Put them in charge! It might give the project a better chance, they at least have some apparent useful skills, and the linkpool.io guys said on reddit that theyare very impressed with how Steve operates. (Didn't mention Serge)

I am a Link bag holder btw but I'm getting out at the next pump, this was one naive business decision at the end of a long list since Sergey decided to run his own businesses.

[Anonymous No.9547717]

>>9547543
God i cannot wait until the LINK community extends beyond this hellhole.

You people are insufferable

[Anonymous No.9547736]

>>9547717
Why dont you fuck off to reddit then pal

[Anonymous No.9547738]

>>9547717

No shit. Fucking autistic teens with $100 in Link think they are funny for posting the same shit over and over for months on end...

[Anonymous No.9547781]

>>9547738
>autistic teens with $100 in Link
I honestly suspect there are people with less than that. $20 is a 100x for me so I will be happy with that.

[Anonymous No.9548092]

>>9545611
Deluded faggot

Every time btc recovers req and link have weak recovery. But when btc is barely going down Link and req will have a massive dump wiping out any gains

At least Link performs better than Req which is saying nothing...

[Anonymous No.9548195]

FAT

[Anonymous No.9548337]

>>9547543
a single day and this pasta is already stale

[Anonymous No.9548520]

Im comfy because of all that fud

[Anonymous No.9548569]

>>9547145

No marketing until mainnnet and merely focusing on the project is a breathe of fresh air tbqh. Crypto is all marketing and hype (announcements of announcements) and 99.9% of these shitcoins are going to crash and burn once people figure out they don't do anything.

[Anonymous No.9548601]

>>9548569

Yup. Its a marathon not a race. Productive dev team gives a solid marketing team something to talk about when they do. A solid but too early marketing team and a lackluster dev team means people grow tired of your bullshit and look to other coins.

[Anonymous No.9549276]

I’ve been holding since pre-SIBOS. This FUD is like water off a duck’s back

[Anonymous No.9549296]

>>9546460
Can you not read, dumbfuck?

[Anonymous No.9549333]

>>9547543
You know, this might have scared me if you retards didn't spam it all over the place making me realize it's just pajeet fud. Learn to fud better, I want to buy more cheap link.