[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 316 KB, 1202x632, sasydx.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9426839 No.9426839 [Reply] [Original]

So, this is it RLC faggots?

>> No.9426879

one of them and its juicy. iexec will be the source of computing power for all smart contracts

>> No.9426885
File: 18 KB, 320x426, IMG-20170107-WA0034.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9426885

>>9426839
Did I get finnessed

>> No.9426911

>j-just wait, I-Intel and IBM is c-coming
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA THIS HAPPENS LITERALLY EVERY TIME EVERY SINGLE HYPED UP ANNOUNCEMENT LMAO

>> No.9426929

>>9426911
that's in a few days during the joint intel iexec presentation you mong

>> No.9426947

>>9426839
ok KEK execuniggas fucking rekt

>> No.9427251

If RSK works with bitcoin cash then I guess it's maybe useful, but we still have no fucking clue if nChain will deliver.

If it relies on segshit, then this means nothing.

>> No.9427291

You're all dumb for assuming the "intel partnership" will be anything else than just intel helping them with setting up an RLC SGX client.

Talking with actual cloud computing companies like IBM, Microsoft's Azure or Amazon Cloud would be much more meaningful.

>> No.9427406
File: 163 KB, 1080x507, Screenshot_20180514-131007_Mimi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9427406

>>9426839
That's not what your only piece of evidence floating around said you deluded brainlet

>> No.9427423
File: 528 KB, 1080x1329, Screenshot_20180514-130714_Telegram.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9427423

>>9426929
Meant to reply to this nigger

>> No.9427425

>>9426839
>implying it isn't huge news
read more here
https://medium.com/iex-ec/rsk-and-iexec-collaborate-together-to-provide-off-chain-computing-to-bitcoin-applications-46f0aedbe87a
It's absolutely huge for RLC.

>> No.9427556

>>9426839
hey anyone knows how iExec is planning move data on and off chain? Are they using a decentralized oracle solution?

>> No.9427649

>>9427556
yes

>> No.9427677

>>9427649
do you know which company/solution they're using?

>> No.9427691

>>9427677
The Whitepaper says it’s using Oraclize

>> No.9427719

>>9427677
Not ChainLink.

>> No.9427863

>>9427691
Thanks anon. Just found the reference to oraclize tools in the iexec oracle repo too. Did the team release any blog post or writeup regarding the decision making process? I personally have no issue with Oraclize's ideas but iirc they did have quite some downtime a while ago which fucked over projects like Etheroll. Slightly concerned about the ability of Oraclize being able to execute flawlessly, as for iExec's case the ability to communicate on and off chain reliably is literally one of the most important aspects of usability