[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 110 KB, 678x381, 1523185462-Bitcoin-Cash-Price-8-April-2018.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9263874 No.9263874 [Reply] [Original]

We are mooning indefinitely Cashies!

>> No.9263885

>>9263874
Bitcoin (BCH) to the moon!

>> No.9263886
File: 88 KB, 1000x1000, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9263886

Please buy Mobius, Sir.

>> No.9263922

>>9263874
$77,777,777 end of march

>> No.9263934

>>9263874
Soon it'll be Bitcoin Crashies.

>> No.9263935

>>9263922
Change the $ sign with $BTCq

>> No.9263941

>>9263935
$BTC

>> No.9263971

>>9263886
>Mobius
Is that LINK 2.0?

>> No.9264009

MONEY (BCH)

>> No.9264021
File: 37 KB, 480x542, 1523700033372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9264021

>tfw I hold BTC instead of BCH out of principle, but it's getting harder and harder to stay true to my convinctions

>> No.9264077

>>9264021

>out of principle

you mean your micro-dick and penis envy?

>> No.9264087

>>9264021
hold both, thats the point of free airdrops like bch anyway

>> No.9264091
File: 1.19 MB, 1080x1589, 1525404179407.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9264091

>>9264021
>out of principle
You want get far in life my dude. Keep up the good work!

>> No.9264102

>>9264021

hahaha. Holy shit why. Also why has this ONLY just dawned on you? If you sold all of your BTC when trading of BCH first went live you would of x3 your entire holdings in USD by now.

It also had some dips you could of increased your positions at.
>out of principle
Which is what... loosing money in a speculative digital asset market?

>> No.9264105

>>9264021
Nice LARP, Cashie

>> No.9264117

>>9264102
you would have also made significantly more money buying other coins

>> No.9264127

>>9264021

>Tfw I believe BCH is the real bitcoin
>Dont trust normes to understand
>Don't touch bitcoin at all because I hate core but didn't believe cash would go up

At least I have EOS and ETH.

>> No.9264138

>>9264117

At significantly higher risk. BCH is a comfy hold and always has been.

I personally don't dabble in shitcoins, for every person on /biz/ doubling their money, someone else is losing.

>> No.9264162

>>9264127

You should probably dump that EOS asap. This non-existent scamcoin is about to implode.

>> No.9264950
File: 6 KB, 286x176, bcash.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9264950

>>9264102
>It also had some dips you could of increased your positions at.

If you had bought the dips of literally any coin including BTC you would have increased your position you fucking retard.

The absolute state of cashies

>> No.9264989

what price we expecting before fork in two weeks? might scoop some up my nigga roger in the cut

>> No.9265016

>>9264989
$1500

>> No.9265116

ETH crashes on Monday our smart contracts on 15th will now do ico’s

>> No.9265125

>>9264138
very little risk in a coin like ethereum, for example

>> No.9265126
File: 1.15 MB, 400x300, blackplauge.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9265126

Looks like BCH goes back to same old BCH/BTC ratio.

>> No.9265360

>>9264950
Goddamn hes upset.

>> No.9265379
File: 1.79 MB, 1456x1100, cashies KEK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9265379

Daily reminder that cashies delete their threads when they get called out on their BS.

>> No.9265393

Cashies are like ETC holders. Piggybacking off the metachain

>> No.9265409

>>9265379
i just have to imagine the people posting write are just false flagging for bch

>> No.9265410

>>9265379
didn't delete this

The Illusion of Scale in Segregated Witness

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2993315

>> No.9265425

>>9265409
wright*

>> No.9265434

>>9265410
>2017
who actually gives a shit?

>> No.9265444

>>9265410
Crack Wright can't into basic maths.

>> No.9265462
File: 35 KB, 1048x118, Screen Shot 2018-05-05 at 9.16.58 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9265462

https://youtu.be/04854XqcfCY

>> No.9265469

>>9265444
Where is he wrong?

>> No.9265531
File: 158 KB, 1200x800, DcZjCX2VMAENHpB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9265531

Chad life

>> No.9265910

>>9265469
He introduces this basic formula about the relationship between price level and money velocity P = VM/Y. If we assume that
M = monetary supply, Y = value of all transactions
are constant (which is complete bullshit because Y depends on the adoption of BTC in payments, that's why this formula is not applicable in the context of Bitcoin btw), we have a linear relationship between P and V. Then he argues this would imply that increasing the velocity of BTC would increase the price of BTC, which is wrong because V is the price level of products measured in BTC and not the price of BTC.

Just read the whole article carefully, it's sub highschool level.

>> No.9266009
File: 111 KB, 1322x386, Screen Shot 2018-05-05 at 9.55.23 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9266009

>>9265910
sounds like mumbo jumbo rebuttal, at this point it doesn't matter as core is heads deep in segwit and lightning

>> No.9266105

>>9264021
What principle is that? Loyalty to blockstream?

>> No.9266115

>>9266009
>I'm not going to prove it but I have the first genesis block
lmao

>> No.9266822
File: 1011 KB, 1893x1075, proof.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9266822

>>9266115

>> No.9267807
File: 39 KB, 673x232, fake-satoshi-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9267807

>>9266822
Fake Satoshi