/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.9239217]

Chainlink will fail. How can it compete when iota is using Qubit a decentralized network provider for distributed oracles. Iota is feeless. Ether is not.

It doesn't matter that chainlink can work on multiple blockchains if every blockchain uses a seperate provider. What evidence is there that we need 20 different blockchains anyway? People investing in chainlink are unironically deluded.

[Anonymous No.9239270]

pingas

[Anonymous No.9239286]

Does Iota solve the oracle problem?

[Anonymous No.9239287]

Also what's with Rory being cryptic about if chainlink had anything to do with Iota? Qubit has nothing to do with chainlink in case anyone cares.

[Anonymous No.9239309]

>>9239286
Qubit solves the oracle problem for iota whicb is feeless. Chainlink will fail because of economics.

[Anonymous No.9239352]

Chainlink cube logo is all over the iota video. Iota needs link.

[Anonymous No.9239425]

>>9239309
Qubit is unrelated to chainlink and iota no longer needs chainlink as they ate using Qubit.

[Anonymous No.9239454]

From the iota discord

[Anonymous No.9239466]

>>9239352
Qubit is unrelated to chainlink and iota no longer needs chainlink as they are using Qubit.

[Anonymous No.9239478]

>>9239454
I'm twice as happy being in ChainLink knowing that smug IOTA fanboys who didn't even talk about oracles before yesterday are going to be proved wrong.

[Anonymous No.9239507]

>>9239309
>Qubit solves the oracle problem
How?
You should be able to prove the claim you're so boldly making, no?

[Anonymous No.9239540]

>>9239507
Qubit is providing a network of decentralized oracles for iota. You need a network of decentraluzed oracles to solve the oracle problem. Are you new?

[Anonymous No.9239558]

>>9239540
Great answer... so you don't know how, what, and why, but you see fit to shitpost to your heart's content.
Dunning kruger in full effect here.

[Anonymous No.9239560]

>>9239454
From: pajeet
By: pajeet city coin
Why am I not surprised

[Anonymous No.9239574]

>fee-less

Keynsians go and stay go

[Anonymous No.9239580]

Even if they did roll out decentralized oracles you'd be stuck using their blockchain (they won't). Most likely they are getting centralised shit oracles like everyone else unless hard evidence proves otherwise

[Anonymous No.9239582]

I went to do my due diligence and see how the Qubic oracle would stack up to Chainlink.
It's literally just a hype video. I'm not even fucking kidding. lmfao

[Anonymous No.9239589]

>>9239558
You obviously can't connect the dots that ive provided

[Anonymous No.9239600]

>>9239589
The only thing you've provided is a very long shitstain on the ground

[Anonymous No.9239617]

>>9239454
the day that chainlink died.

Rest in peace

[Anonymous No.9239620]

>>9239600
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rElpfsFQOSY

[Anonymous No.9239642]

>>9239620
is this the single worst piece of music ever created?

[Anonymous No.9239655]

>>9239287
>cryptic
you are literally retarded

[Anonymous No.9239668]

>>9239217
>IOTA is better than Ethereum
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
OH NONONONONO
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH

[Anonymous No.9239675]

Unironically, IOTA and VEN just marketed oracles with their products and essentially validated the usecase in this space. Im now convinced Link will moon but it might take some time.

[Anonymous No.9239684]

>>9239574
you're already paying for bandwidth you faggot. why pay for a transaction too? how much did you pay 4chan for that post? the absolute state of biz

[Anonymous No.9239685]

>>9239642
t. weighs a ton

[Anonymous No.9239711]

>>9239675
The funniest part is seeing all the IOTA retards go "Oh yeah, oracle, yeah, how exciting" like they aren't capable of getting excited about something until it's been put in a "high tech" animated hype advertisement. Fucking cretins lmao

[Anonymous No.9239735]

>>9239711
my virgin big brain enjoys this as well

t. 11k linklet

[Anonymous No.9239862]

[Anonymous No.9239972]

>>9239675
I agree on the use case being expanded, but disagree on link’s moon. I think this will bring it forward; VEN and IOTA will unironically set the bar very low on oracles, and Link will look amazing by comparison

[Anonymous No.9239995]

>>9239217
there already are many different blockchains and they're not going away to all join iota.

[Anonymous No.9240041]

>>9239589
>posts "CHAINLINK WILL FALL, QUBIT CAN DO ORACLES, ALSO ECONOMICS SIRS"
>You obviously can't connect the dots that ive provided
the absolute status of this Macedonian chicken breeding forum. sage and kys

[Anonymous No.9240050]

>>9239711
Or maybe people were already interested, but it actually being added to a viable crypto platform that has corporate partnerships out the ass is exciting.
>where were you the day chainlink died

[Anonymous No.9240089]

This is now an Ambrosus shill thread. Iota and link are garbage

[Anonymous No.9240102]

>>9239582
Literally this. Why can’t you brainlets stop lumping “muh oracles” into the same fucking pool. Do you even know what a fucking oracle is? Aside from that, do you have any specific information as to what data the iota oracles will provide to *iota specific* smart contracts (oh, guess that detail didn’t register). We don’t know, but it looks like from the video it’s a pretty narrow spectrum... market data and what not. Once again, just for iota. It would take too long to explain why you’re comparisons are so small minded since you all are fucking retarded and don’t even know what you’re investing in/FUDing.

[Anonymous No.9240116]

Reasons why Ambrosus is better than link or iota

1. Best memes
2. Chad ceo
3. Mooning unlike your shitcoins
4. Masternode income for life

[Anonymous No.9240121]

>>9239217
why does nobody on biz understand what 'unironically' means. you're seriously all retarded down syndrome faggots

[Anonymous No.9240143]

>>9239217
who cares?

[Anonymous No.9240146]

Link is the Trojan for autistic fucks

Iota is for rebellious teenagers who think they can upset btc dominance.

Ambrosus is for MANLY MEN

[Anonymous No.9240150]

This is half decent FUD, but you need to develop it more

[Anonymous No.9240196]

>>9239454
lmao who the fuk is that nigga

[Anonymous No.9240234]

>>9239589
Hahahha holy fuck you are cringe.
"I can't explain what I'm talking about because I don't even know how chainlink addresses the oracle problem, or understand how this differs from how iota tries to approach the problem, but if I just claim that you can't connect the dots and you won't notice what a retard I am."
See? If you were being honest you would have just typed that, but now you just look like a braindead faggot. Rip.

[Anonymous No.9240259]

>>9239684

Ye let's just add inflation instead that makes sense

Neck urself

[Anonymous No.9240272]

>>9240146
How much do you get paid?
honest question.
I mean you realize everyone knows you're full of shit, and you guys are posting this bullshit all day.
How much do you get paid to do it?

[Anonymous No.9240321]

>>9240259
inflation works if the commodity is in demand. neck your mother then yourself. nigger

[Anonymous No.9240331]

>>9240146
every time I consider buying AMB I see you faggots stinking up every biz thread with your shitty generic paid shilling and I immediately change my mind. seriously, fatsetti, you're doing more harm than good I promise you