rate portofolio

[Anonymous No.9144587]

500k in Constellation Labs
350k in Holochain
80k in Lamden

Only american companies crew

[Anonymous No.9144748]

bump fgts

[Anonymous No.9144843]

>>9144587
It's number 5. Too easy, really.

And your portfolio is 2/10.

[Anonymous No.9144896]

Long term 8 or 9/10, I'd go bigger on holo than constellation but you have 0 shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.9144915]

>>9144843
what is your portofolio? 10% btc, 10% eth, 10% tron, 10% vechain, 10% eos, 10% cardano, 10% wanchain, eetc etc? you dumb binance faggot

[Anonymous No.9144938]

>>9144896
yeah i wouldve switched 350k consta & 500k holo if i could

[Anonymous No.9145034]

>>9144587
Constellation is the best troll I've ever seen
10/10
Whitepaper is epic

[Anonymous No.9145053]

>>9144915
Kek absolute state of normies
good portfolio OP
How did you already get into constellation labs or is that how much you're going to buy?
Holo is 100x at least
Lamden could be 10x pretty soon

[Anonymous No.9145214]

>>9145053
>100x at least
i invested in rakugo's ico that didn't reach min cap. i kept track of these guys and was one of the very first telegram member of the constellation telegram.

[Anonymous No.9145889]

>>9144915
>>9145053

I'm trying to denormify, OP et. al. Any resources on where you first learn about these types of projects in your portfolio?

[Anonymous No.9145930]

Put everything into Constellation after Holochain had its initial moon, you have no clue how big this is going to be in the 2020's.

[Anonymous No.9146001]

Answer is 2.

>>9144843
What's it like being a fucking retard?

[Anonymous No.9146631]

>>9145889
high iq. i found about holo in august 2017 by googling for directed acyclic graphs and non blockchain cryptocurrencies

[Anonymous No.9146662]

>>9146001
I disagree, I think it's 5 too

[Anonymous No.9146739]

Can you not mention constellation you fucking cunts? It’s our secret.

It will follow the same process as holochain. I’m here to make another 250k CAD. Not done yet.

[Anonymous No.9146753]

>>9144843
>>9146001
>>9146662
Strongly think 5 but it took me fucking ages

[Anonymous No.9146757]

>>9146662
It's clearly number 5.

[Anonymous No.9146781]

>>9144587
>raven's progressive matrices

What a good test. This is seriously the best way to hurt a liberal who believes all IQ tests are influenced by culture or education.

Not only do they come to realize they're wrong about that, they get to see evidence that they're on the retard end of the dunning-kruger effect

[Anonymous No.9146798]

>>9144587
classic American company

[Anonymous No.9146810]

>>9146781
Then explain the Flynn effect brainlet.
IQ tests are pseudoscience, our descendants will laugh at them.

[Anonymous No.9146812]

I think is 7.
My IQ is 135 just for reference.

[Anonymous No.9146848]

>>9146781
>good test
shitty pattern matching is only good so a few self-congratulatory autists can circlejerk about a test that proves absolutely nothing and does not imply causation into any form of intelligence.

[Anonymous No.9146853]

>>9146798
>Meg Skeleton
>Isn't a skeleton

Terrible investment.

[Anonymous No.9146878]

>>9146810
There are dozens of possible explanations, but why does that even matter?

Fluid intelligence can be measured completely independent of cultural or educational background. You can certainly train your fluid IQ a bit higher, just like you can lift weights to get stronger. But it takes the right genes to be among the best, as it always does

[Anonymous No.9146914]

>>9146878
If IQ is innate, and IQ tests test it without cultural bias, then the only explanation for the Flynn effect is explosive human evolution on the scale of an xman timeline.
Which, to me, seems implausible.

[Anonymous No.9146947]

>>9146812
Its 5 u brainlet

[Anonymous No.9146974]

>>9144587

I think it's 5 and i'll explain why

all of the symbols consist of 3 shapes = straight line, curved line, rectangle

curved line = 12

straight line = 10

rectangle = 9

number 5 makes it so that there are 12 appearances of every shape

i could be wrong but that's my reasoning

[Anonymous No.9146981]

>>9146947
I think it's five as well because if you ad the total number of lines in every horizontal it adds up to twelve.

[Anonymous No.9147019]

>>9146947
fuck, now I see it.
>mfw

[Anonymous No.9147099]

>>9146974
No, brainlet. The third item has to have the same number of intersections as the first and then it's the process of elimination for the vertical and horizontal lines. Meaning if the first two horizontal lines are curved-thick and straight-thin, then the only one left is straight-thick.

>mfw I share a board with such brainlets

[Anonymous No.9147101]

>>9146974
>>9146981
weird, my reasoning was looking at the patterns in the red lines.

[Anonymous No.9147160]

>>9147101
i think it's 5. my reasoning was looking at col 1 and col 3. it's basically a 90 degree rotation + bendy black lines become thin blacks and vice versa. i assumed mid column was a red herring

[Anonymous No.9147196]

>>9146914
>what is nutrition
Your upper limit is biological though

[Anonymous No.9147217]

>>9147160
There are no rows and colums, its just a group.
2 vertical thin lines and 3 horizontal bars are the missing elements of the group.

[Anonymous No.9147251]

>>9146853
Underrated af

[Anonymous No.9147284]

>>9144843
Literal brainlet. It's 2

[Anonymous No.9147295]

>>9147217
weird, every time I see these questions I always look for patterns per column and/or per row. I'm pretty sure my pattern works, whether it was intentional or not

[Anonymous No.9147302]

>>9147160
The rectangles increase by one moving on the diagonals, also they intersect with one of the three figures so the missing one is 5.

Now we have seen three ways of solving it, I guess the test is really universal after all.

[Anonymous No.9147323]

Its 5 u faggots . Iq is a meme . People with high iqs work for people that r good at making fake friends

[Anonymous No.9147387]

>>9147302
Nice anon, like the reasoning but disagree.

[Anonymous No.9147424]

its 5
straight line = 1
rectangle = 2
curved line = 3
all rows add up to 24.
plus, the diagonal pattern.

[Anonymous No.9147465]

>>9147099

Your "solution" totally disregards the middle row, and is based on your interpretation of what "first" and "third" is. So going from top to bottom, your solution doesn't work. Mine solution looks at all the symbols as part of a whole. I can point out flaws in your reasoning, but how is mine wrong, aside from you saying "it's wrong"?

[Anonymous No.9147488]

>>9146631
Thanks OP, I appreciate the leads on these too. What's the deal with only a whitepaper on Constellation's github? I'm doing deeper digging and these guys seem legit, but that's a bit strange.

Also lol @ these faggots arguing over a puzzle.

[Anonymous No.9147512]

>>9146914
do some more reading anon, it has long been recognised that Flynn effect gains come overwhelmingly in the non-g-loaded aspects of test performance.

the principal explanation for this is that as abstract logic and artificial environments become more universal in everyday life.

the g-loaded gains are small and are mostly due to better nutrition (indeed coming close to banishing most acute deficiency syndromes in the west)

Flynn effect reversals are already being observed as a result of dysgenic reproduction, particularly in females. environmental effects are a tragically poor compensation for a permanent reduction in genetic quality, unfortunately.

Also the persistent racial IQ gaps are at this point mostly due to the hereditary G factor.

answer = 5

[Anonymous No.9147520]

>>9147488
we like puzzles

[Anonymous No.9147553]

>>9147465
Yeah, you definitely sudoku'd that shit. That was probably the intended reasoning. Funny that I got the right answer by chance when there was a much simpler solution. Also, this makes me feel like IQ tests are learnable because I can tell that I will never forget your approach now.

[Anonymous No.9147576]

>>9147099
also you are supporting evidence to the meme that it's mainly brainlets who like to call other people "brainlets"

[Anonymous No.9147584]

>>9147520
I'm sure you do, my sweet retard <3`

[Anonymous No.9147643]

>>9147512
I mean we cant even accurately define intelligence. Tests are possibly useful for identifying intellectual disabilities, but not much else.

[Anonymous No.9147656]

>>9147465
>>9147576

They're called "progressive" matrices for a reason, you small-time brainlets. The pattern progresses left to right since that's how the test was designed. Nice try though.

[Anonymous No.9147700]

>>9147656
i thought they were called that because dirty liberals made them

[Anonymous No.9147702]

>>9147465
>totally disregards the middle row

What? The pattern is the same in the middle row as the first. If you meant columns, then you're an even bigger brainlet than I thought since you can't differentiate the difference between columns and rows. Nothing in my strategy disregards any row or column, you're just too dumb to understand it.

[Anonymous No.9147761]

>>9147656
>They're called "progressive" matrices for a reason, you small-time brainlets. The pattern progresses left to right
is dis bait

[Anonymous No.9147791]

Arrssy is that you

[Anonymous No.9147873]

answer is 5, brainlets

[Anonymous No.9147879]

>>9147284
its 5 you retard

[Anonymous No.9147892]

i figured it out
each row must have 6 vertical and 6 horizontal sticks
each column must have 4 of each style
stare at this for a while and you'll know the answer is
5
god damn you OP for baiting me with this life wasting puzzle

[Anonymous No.9147931]

>>9146001
It's 5 kek

[Anonymous No.9147942]

fucking brainlets

[Anonymous No.9148205]

>>9146848
>the time it takes a person to recognize patterns has no implications for their g-factor

Sure, a miniscule fraction of the populace would score well on the RPM test while being totally inept everywhere else. What's your point?

[Anonymous No.9148292]

its 5
each column you need 4 hollow sticks, 4 curved lines, and 4 thin lines.